Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Our Buddies at Ground Zero

Reading from left to right, here are Mark Roberts (Gravy), Kate from Debunk911Myths, Abby Scott, and Reality Bites (from the JREF forums.



Gravy's report on their day at Ground Zero on 9/11/06 is here. It's just a tad more sensible and articulate than "Treez" post below.

15 Comments:

At 13 September, 2006 17:42, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

You guys are phenomenal. I am too old and too tired to do what you guys do, even online. Ah to be 10 years younger, and to be in NYC.

Keep it up. You guys rock.

TAM

 
At 13 September, 2006 19:55, Blogger James B. said...

Hey, nobody is allowed to sexually harass Abby on this blog. Well, except for me of course...

 
At 13 September, 2006 22:21, Blogger nes718 said...

How cute! Dubya youth :)

 
At 14 September, 2006 03:38, Blogger shawn said...

Dubya youth :)

I doubt any of them voted for the man, child.

 
At 14 September, 2006 11:39, Blogger nes718 said...

I doubt any of them voted for the man, child.

Don't matter if they voted for him or not. They are supporting his lies so that makes 'Red State' folks or as I accurately described Dubya Youth! :D

 
At 14 September, 2006 12:12, Blogger Alex said...

Just out of curiosity, what part of your body is the SS tatoo on?

 
At 14 September, 2006 13:02, Blogger shawn said...

Just out of curiosity, what part of your body is the SS tatoo on?

Dude, didn't you know? Hitler was a Zionist.

They are supporting his lies

Orwell loves you, baby.

 
At 14 September, 2006 17:32, Blogger nes718 said...

Dude, didn't you know? Hitler was a Zionist.

This is correct and the "SS" had Jews and half Jews within their ranks. They are the "Young Turks" of Germany.

 
At 14 September, 2006 17:33, Blogger nes718 said...

Just out of curiosity, what part of your body is the SS tatoo on?

I am not a Zionazi so I don't agree wiht the SS.

 
At 14 September, 2006 18:15, Blogger Alex said...

Yeah, right. Don't lie, we know that all of you KKK Kids have them!

"It's a well established fact!"

 
At 14 September, 2006 18:31, Blogger shawn said...

I am not a Zionazi so I don't agree wiht the SS.


bahahahahahah you get funnier with every post! Zionazi! hahahaha

Now you're getting things mixed up.

The SS were part of the NSDAP, the "Zionazis" are what idiots call Zionists (sorry, the Nazis weren't Zionists, no matter how badly you want that to be true).

(PS he has the tattoo in his armpit - that's where they got them.)

 
At 15 September, 2006 14:00, Blogger Ã˜yvind said...

Don't matter if they voted for him or not. They are supporting his lies so that makes [them] 'Red State' folks or as I accurately described Dubya Youth! :D

Surely you're not implying Dubya is red, as in socialist?

And yes, they support his "lies". But that doesn't mean they support him. I agree with Kim Jong-Il that evolution is a proven fact. I suppose that makes me a Kim Youth member, then?

Or a ibn Ladin-supporter - I agree with Usama when he says the theory of gravity is real.

I truly am evil. If you don't see me again, it's because I've decided to isolate myself as punishment for my support of the ideas of evil dictators and terrorists.

So long.

 
At 15 September, 2006 16:56, Blogger shawn said...

Many of them regretted getting that after the war

Eichmann was smart enough to get his removed.

Fortunately, he wasn't smart enough to escape the gallows.

 
At 17 September, 2006 14:07, Blogger shawn said...

Smart kids such as yourselves who have some misguided belief that - it's your duty to protect the govt. against criticism and against films like Loose Change or the comments of Steven Jones.

Our belief is that the truth deserves to be defended, it has nothing to do with the government.

Bush thinks creationism should be taught in schools, but I attack creationism every chance I get.

It's about truth, numbskull, not defense of the government.

 
At 18 September, 2006 23:10, Blogger mbats said...

how can you defend the truth - when I propose to you that you don't know what the truth is.

The only reason anyone is not sure about the truth of this is because they are ignoring the mass of witness testimony and evidence and are focusing on the anamolies (which usually have more reasonable explanations than a gov't conspiracy).

A position in support of the govt. (in particular, when it comes to matters of war) has historically proven to be a fools position.

So the government's decision to get involved in WWII was a foolish idea?!?

you are complicit in failing in your Constitutional duty to question and distrust your govt.

Sure, I've come to the same conclusions as the government - but it hasn't been a matter of trust. I still trust the government as far as I can throw it (nope - still can't even lift it). I wouldn't have learned as much as I have about 9/11 without questioning the government story - but no matter how much I dislike them, most of their story pans out.

If you guys are wrong (you are trying to defend the govt. on an amazing number of points and issues) - wow -

I can't speak for everybody, but I'm open to the possibility of being wrong - I just need solid, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evedience to disprove what is, from my armchair analysis, a soild case that 19 guys with foreign backing pulled this off. If you can provide that, I'm all for finding a theory that incorporates your new evidence that still makes sense with all the other evidence.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home