9/11 Deniers on CeeCee Lyles
I am used to reading offensive stuff on 9/11 denier sites, but this one was pathetic. One of the bloggers over on 9/11 blogger is "investigating" United Airlines flight attendent CeeCee Lyles, who famously left a phone message from her doomed airliner.
We were told that CeeCee Lyles was a flight attendanton United Flight 93. The following news report statesthat in early 2004 her husband, Lorne Lyles, received more than $1-million from United, the Victim's Compensation Fund and several charities.
However, CeCe [sic] Lyles is not listed in the September11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001.And CeCe [sic] Lyles is not listed in the Social SecurityDeath Index as well.
And here are seven versions of the CeCe [sic] Lyles phonecall. (One from Jeb Bush)
Apparently she doesn't exist, and this whole thing is just a big scam. Maybe the author of this piece would like to look up her husband and sons and tell them this? The least they could do is spell her name right.
Incidently, the flash animation entered into evidence at the Moussaoui trial has the message she left. I guess that is made up too.
posted by James B. @ 12:22 PM
14 comments
14 Comments:
I seriously wish rectal cancer on these fuckers.
I wish these retards would quit bringing up the Social Security Death Index. From the SSDI page:
Common reasons for exclusion include the following:
Survivor death benefits were (are) being paid to dependents or spouse.
Hmmm, dependents?
Can someone explain to me the difference between twoofer "disinfo" and their REAL info?
Theories that the twoofer agrees with are legitimate information.
Theories that the twoofer disagrees with are disinformation, intentionally planted by government shills, because the "correct" theories are just sooooooooooo dangerous.
Of course, what's disinformation to one twoofer is a legitimate theory to another. This is yet another thing the twoofers can't agree on: what is and isn't disinformation.
Note also that there is no such thing as a sincere, but incorrect, theory.
Go read the Leo Wanta thread, and see how BG's accusations of disinformation are directly proportional to his personal approval of each item.
Looking at the bigger picture, I think this kind of nuttiness is just another indication of the increasing desperation of the 9/11 Denial Movement.
How low can 9/11 Deniers go?
I notice the usual troothers who show up herer spamming and spouting platitutde got real, real quiet all of a sudden.
Why is this a surprise? Slander is the name of their game. Look at what they say about Larry Silverstein, without one shred of evidence. Heck, who isn't guilty of mass murder by their standards?
OMG!
I wholly agree that Killtown is disinfo. BUT one tactic the shills have been using A LOT is to have shills discredit themselves either before or after referencing some valid info, thus making people assume that it, like everything else the shill says, is bogus.
We need a section or a site documenting shill tricks. Stuff like faking a document that exposes the truth to discredit the truth along with the document. You know, that kind of stuff. It seems to be one of their most effective tactics.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Just a quick reminder that the number of actual disinfo agents remains zero.
Ceecee's drivers licence used at the Moussaoui trial and claimed to have been discovered at the UA 93
"crash" site has been proven to be a fraud.The licence was issued in 1997 with the surname Lyles.The problem is that this wasn't her surname in 1997.One more nail in the million in the coffin of the official story.More at 911 Researchers.
I knew her personally. She was a great person and is greatly missed.
I TOO KNOW CEECEE PERSONALLY, AND FLEW WITH HER ON SEVERAL OCCASSIONS.... I LOVE HER AND HER FAMILY DEARLY......
Her husband doesn't even believe the stories, being given...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axV_dvjEO0w&feature=related
This comment has been removed by the author.
In many conspiracy web sites I read that the license issued to CeeCee Ross Lyles is a fakery because it shows an issue date of 12/02/1997, but CeeCee Ross Lyles did not have the surname of Lyles in 1997.
I thought that the only thing to do to clear the matter and dispel all doubts was to directly contact the FLHSMV, Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, which issues driving licenses, to ask for a clear and precise answer on the issue, attaching a picture of the document in question in which the alphanumeric code is clearly visible, and the smaller print dates slightly less so (The United States vs. Zacarias Moussaoui Prosecution Trial Exhibit # P200069 http://tinyurl.com/P200069 ).
I received two answers from the FLHSMV offices providing "Public Records" on driver licenses:
"When a duplicate Florida license is issued it will show the original issuance date as well as the duplicate issuance date. You are correct in your statement that a person could have one name on the original issuance and a different name on a duplicate issuance. The name change would be reflected on the record history with this type of issuance."
--------------------------------
The response to your question, “In particular I wanted to know if a duplicate will show the original issuance date as well as the duplicate issuance date. Even if the last name of the person changed in the meanwhile (for example a divorce and a new marriage),” is yes and was yes at the time the license in question was issued.
Department records reflect the following information:
CeeCee Ross was issued a renewal Florida Driver License on Dec. 2, 1997 that would expire on Nov. 26, 2003.
CeeCee Ross was issued a replacement license on Oct. 6, 1999.
CeeCee Ross Lyles was issued a replacement license on May 5, 2000.
CeeCee Ross Lyles was issued a replacement license on May 23, 2001.
-----------------------------------
Here is my web page with all the history and informations:
http://www.diegocuoghi.com/ceecee/english/
Post a Comment
<< Home