Friday, February 16, 2007

Twilight Zone Territory

Now I have been following this stuff for a while, so I thought I had pretty much seen it all, but this one on the conspiracy site APFN takes the cake:

On 9-11, the planned target for Enron sponsored al Qaeda's Martyrdom Battalion misfit Muslim radicals apparently was top U.S. infidel, anti-Enron Energy Czar Dick Cheney. Apparently Ken Lay exploited their desperate fanaticism to get a trans Afghan pipeline from Turkmenistan into Communist China.

Enron-owned President Bush apparently spoiled Ken Lay's apparent plan by leaving Laura Bush as a sitting duck in the White House with his running mate Cheney. George H.W. Bush probably realized his son's treachery. A NetJet (controlled by Warren Buffett and Arnold Schwarzenegger) was used to track United Flight 93 so USAF Major Rick Gibney could shoot it down and destroy evidence. Bad Boy Born-again Bush gave a direct order from U. S. Air Force One.

On 9-11, non-commander Bush hid with children who had been told lovely librarian Laura Bush was going to hear them read about billy goats as part of her "Read don't watch" campaign. The 41 minute delay of Flight 93 from Newark until the a white NetJet could get in place to track it caused three other teams of suicide hijackers to delay their attacks causing over 2,600 unplanned murders in the preset demolition of the Twin Towers and a remote controlled attack by an F-16 and its missile on the Pentagon Office of Naval Intelligence. NORAD had an extra 41 minutes to intercept three hijacked flights as it has been doing routinely since 1958.

Bumbling Bachelor-to-be Bush was so disturbed by these unplanned mass murders as a direct result of his sexual mischief that he flew around in Air Force One to see Ken Lay in Louisiana and Warren Buffett in Nebraska to figure out what to do. The coverup started with Senator John McCain pronouncing 3,000 murders as "acts of war." Then gradually other bought-off members of Congress got in on the cover up conspiracy, disgustingly including you, leading to Public Law 107-243.


Three words, get help now.

24 Comments:

At 16 February, 2007 14:48, Blogger BG said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 16 February, 2007 15:18, Blogger BG said...

Anything which links to AUDIO: www.cloakanddagger.de has my vote.

And that vote is a screaming Nay!

 
At 16 February, 2007 16:11, Blogger Alex said...

Shut up bill.

 
At 16 February, 2007 18:16, Blogger Richard said...

Holy crap, that guy is nucking futz!

 
At 16 February, 2007 19:57, Blogger BG said...

Speaking of Twilight Zone Territory:

Adam Gadahn

 
At 16 February, 2007 20:01, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

The plot is so twisted, you can barely recognize it as a plot...lol

nucking futz...I love it.

TAM

 
At 16 February, 2007 21:12, Blogger shawn said...

Bill, fun fact:

Al-Qaeda means "The Base".

When Arabs do math and they call the base of the triangle "al-qaeda" they mean it's the toilet of the triangle?

 
At 17 February, 2007 03:46, Blogger The Girl in Grey said...

So strange I doubt even I could have thought of it. But where's Elvis? Surely he has to be involved somewhere?

 
At 17 February, 2007 05:07, Blogger gb said...

Next week, on a very special Night Gallery

 
At 17 February, 2007 06:21, Blogger 911DD said...

Do you believe the video ad for "911Eyewitness" is subject to "Truth in Advertising" laws?

 
At 17 February, 2007 11:45, Blogger BG said...

911dd,

Isn't all advertising for commerical products in the US subject to Truth in Advertising law.

And your point is?

Check out the latest from John Connor

He's not talking about Bohemian Grove, and he's not using a megaphone.... that's progress.

You guys will probably want the Professor fired for allowing the subversion in his classroom.

 
At 17 February, 2007 12:36, Blogger Alex said...

The truth in advertising laws don't apply here since these movies are quite clearly a work of fiction. Fiction is untrue by definition. Truth in advertising laws only apply when you make serious claims.

 
At 17 February, 2007 13:32, Blogger Triterope said...

Furthermore, I doubt the courts would ever allow movies to fall under Truth in Advertising laws, on grounds that it would contitute prior restraint.

 
At 17 February, 2007 13:55, Blogger BG said...

Triterope said...

Furthermore, I doubt the courts would ever allow movies to fall under Truth in Advertising laws, on grounds that it would contitute prior restraint.


It would be so great if authority did try to take action against the advertising for this video. Talk about great publicity!

 
At 17 February, 2007 15:46, Blogger Col. Jenny Sparks said...

Anyone seen my "papa bear"? We just got through passing out the awards for the Hardfire Poetry Contest:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/6286

Thought he'd like to know.

Cheers all! ;-)

 
At 17 February, 2007 16:58, Blogger Alex said...

Col. Jenny, Brigadier General Alex says "go fist yourself".

That is all.

 
At 17 February, 2007 17:55, Blogger Col. Jenny Sparks said...

Brigadier General Alex says "go fist yourself".

Oh!Oh! I've been impugned! Help! Smelling salts! *swoon* THUNK!

LOL!!!

And YOU complain bg is repetitive and unoriginal... ;P

 
At 17 February, 2007 18:03, Blogger shawn said...

This Jenny character is one of the morons?

 
At 17 February, 2007 18:32, Blogger Alex said...

Yep. Amazingly enough she's even more passive-aggressive than Bill.

 
At 17 February, 2007 19:20, Blogger Col. Jenny Sparks said...

Alex, love, when I need to be agressive, I'm just AGGRESSIVE. I'm a pretty direct girl-stud that way.

I think the word you're looking for is facetious, or even satirical--though I could see how Pat has you confused on that point. Let me help:

Satire= wit
Satire DOES NOT = feces and swastikas

So, are YOU a pretty boy?

 
At 18 February, 2007 00:08, Blogger Alex said...

No, satirical you are not. Satire requires wit and at least some comedic ability. You fail on both counts. Passive-aggressive describes you much better - you preach your hateful ideology while attempting to come off as a friendly neighbourhood schoolgirl. Unfortunately for you, you're also quite transparent. The best passive-aggressives are much better at hiding their nature.

 
At 18 February, 2007 06:46, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Jenny likes to play this site as insignificant, along with those who post here. In doing so, she feels she is being most effective in dealing with us. Notice rarely an argument from her, just matronizing quips, along with alot of comments meant to make us look like "retards". It is a simple tactic really...and I guess it is just her way.

TAM

 
At 18 February, 2007 06:47, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

passive here

aggressive at 911blogger

that about sums her up.

TAM

 
At 20 February, 2007 00:56, Blogger Col. Jenny Sparks said...

The Artistic Macrophage said...

Jenny likes to play this site as insignificant, along with those who post here. In doing so, she feels she is being most effective in dealing with us. Notice rarely an argument from her, just matronizing quips, along with alot of comments meant to make us look like "retards". It is a simple tactic really...and I guess it is just her way.

Just in the interests of scholarship I'm curious as to which of my comments are indicative of any or all of the above.

I don't remember seriously saying, or particularly thinking, this site is insignificant. Though by how you mention it, perhaps that's your anxiety?

And I'm hardly here to make you look like "retards"; IMHO you don't need my help with that. For instance, your entire post is riddled with assumptions that either are not true or are only partially true. Perhaps you should lay off the JREF and get out and have a beer occasionally. Then you won't assume someone who disagrees with you is auto-matically attacking you.

Part of my inspiration was the fake "Nico"; for one shining moment Alex stopped posting like an agressive prat and showed he was human. Just because "Nico" was an imposter doesn't take away from that.

And that is why I avoid arguing the evidence here. Honestly, TAM--we are not going to convince each other of anything just by thowing shite back and forth on-line. You know that. I know that. So why waste each other's time? Besides, I believe you have a right to a site that reflects your views without someone gratuitously trolling to cause disruption. This is why you correctly note I am agressive at 911Blogger--when needed. My visiting here is a privalege and, being a gentlewoman, I try to act accordingly--funny old thing you think civility=passivity.

Okay, I admit I tweak you lot a bit--but this is nothing compared to what my "papa bear" was doing on blogger. You know what I'm capable of--so be bloody grateful I'm playing nice.

Oh, and I do think Pat and James are taking all of us for a ride reguarding Nico.

Alex: you sound like you need a beer more than TAM does. And since you both seem to be starving for debate, perhaps you can begin by showing me where I've "preached a hateful idealogy".

So, you're not a pretty boy? ;-)

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home