Deja Vu All Over Again
I was watching the video of the recent Arizona conference. It is full of rather interesting moments, including our very own Pat, but I found this part especially amusing (mostly because it proved me right once again). Jim Marrs from 26:35 in:
I interviewed Sergeant Lauro Chavez who was with US Central Command, he said that on the morning of 9/11 they were in the middle of wargame exercises. One of the exercises involved hijacker airplanes being flown into the World Trade Center. When it happened, they were flabbergasted, they turned on CNN, they were watching the same scenes we all saw, they said how can it be that what we were here wargaming has now happened in real life. And I am sure that most of those people are still in the military, most of them are still quiet. They are not sinister conspirators, but they all participated in what happened on 9/11. And that's why we haven't heard anything out of it. As long as the official position is that it was Osama bin Laden and his 19 hijackers, these people will continue to be quiet.
Uhh Jim, those people did not participate in 9/11, in fact the man you interviewed did not participate in 9/11! As I mentioned 6 months ago, even though Lauro Chavez was proven to be a total fake, that will not stop conspiracy theorists from citing him as a source. This would make no less than 3 members of the "Scholars" who have cited him as a witness AFTER it already came out that he was a complete fake. Do these people have any standards whatsoever for evidence? That is an honest question, I would really like to know. Is there anything at all they will not cite as evidence if it supports their viewpoint?
Labels: 9-11 Accountability, Jim Marrs, Lauro Chavez
posted by James B. @ 9:01 PM
6 comments
6 Comments:
Answer: If Hitler's ghost showed up tomorrow saying 9-11 Was An Inside Job, they'd be telling us how misunderstood he was.
If Joe Isuzu showed up, they'd be talking about how great those Isuzus were.
This comment is on topic in a non obvious way:
I'm not saying I agree (you know me, I'm skeptical) with Fintan Dunne, but check it out.
I'm not saying you're a fucking moron, but, well, you know...something to think about.
"This would make no less than 3 members of the "Scholars" who have cited him as a witness AFTER it already came out that he was a complete fake."
It's really kind of sad that so many in "truth" movement are so far behind the times. I mean, you still hear people talking about the FEMA report on WTC7 as if it the only investigation that has and will be done on the building, and going on-and-on about how "half-assed" it is.
Many also still seem to think that "pancake collapse" was an official and final conclusion about the collapse of the Twin Towers.
Sad, sad, sad...
No, bg, you are not skeptical. You are a fraud.
"..including our very own Pat,.."
I'm curious, who's Pat?
My guess is.. the guy who goes on about Holocaust deniers at 29:00 - 31:00 . Am i right?
Post a Comment
<< Home