Rosie Pimps Scholars for 9-11 Truth
The folks at 9-11 Blogger are elated that she's text-messaging their stupid stuff, without apparently noticing that Rosie's got top spot on her blogroll devoted to the "Scholars" for 9-11 "Truth". That's right, Rosie's in Uncle Fetzer's corner:
If you click the link, you go to the NEW Scholars for 9-11 Denial website, completely bypassing the old ST911 website, and into the land of Uncle Fetzer and Judy Wood and Kevin Barrett.
Rosie suggests "research" here:
james writes:
Ro I can see how you can hate bush but “controlled demolitions”? How many buildings ever been hit with airplanes with jet fuel? Hate fairly
scholars for 9 11
research it
Now she's a researcher?
Labels: 9-11 Cultists., Rosie O'Donnell, The Scholars
posted by Pat @ 8:48 PM
20 comments
20 Comments:
I love it. I wonder which "scholar" she thinks is the most credible? Space-Ray, Credit Card or the one who thinks every single suicide bombing in Iraq is a false flag operation?
"While discussing the 9/11 anniversary and the war in Iraq on Sept. 12, O'Donnell compared "radical Christianity" to the Islamo-fascist beliefs of those who planned and carried out the 9/11 terrorist attacks."
So by her thinking Bush is a Islamo-fascist?
"And just one second," O'Donnell said. "Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America where we have a separation of church and state. We're a democracy here."
Well I agree with her here.
The "Rosie's View "
Must be mad cow disease.
I certainly cannot compare the two. While they are some radical christians who would love to get rid of the world of the vile homosexuals and athiests, they haven't done any violents of extreme magnitude like 9/11. Until I see some Christians start shooting up the place and ramming planes, comparing the two idealogies is rather ridiculous
Arr, my engrish.
Geez, I didn't realize how far gone she is. That blog has an ad for an ANSWER rally.
She can suck up to the Stalinists at ANSWER and to and the terrorists all she wants. At the end of the day one still wants to confiscate all of her wealth and the other still wants to behead her.
The loose change gang has found an article from the National Enquirer March 12th edition quoting Barbara Walters: "Rosie has said some very strong stuff, but she never blamed the U.S. for the Sept. 11th terror attacks."
Sounds like Rosie better fall in line if she wants to keep her job.
I have had that argument with others before. When radical Islamists express their anti-gay sentiments, they stone them to death. When radical Christian fundamenalists express their anti-gay sentiments, they hold silly press conferences about Teletubbies. There is a bit of a difference.
Well, Christian Timothy McVeigh.
And I can picture the "God hate Fags" Group strapping on bombs.
It's not the people but the idea of a faith that teaches that something as fanciful as a "god" is more important then a human life.
Christian extremists have the potential to be just as bad as Islamic extremists, yes. The difference is in the mindset of the followers rather than in the theology. Same goes for religious cults, secular cults, and political ideologies. They all have the potential to create great harm, but not all of them do. Christian extremists today are a rare phenomenon, and violent ones even more so. Meanwhile, what we would consider Islamic extremism is actually quite mainstream, and violence is an accepted social tool in much of the Muslim world. THAT is a problem.
Well, Christian Timothy McVeigh.
McVeigh described himself as agnostic, at least until he found himself in the figurative foxhole of the old saying.
Even were he a Christian, as Eric Rudolph was for example, a few or even a bunch of sigletons does not translate upward into the worldwide threat that Islamic extremism does. There are no Christian governments sentencing rape victims to 90 lashes and wanting to continue the prohibition on gay marriage, whilst not right, is not even in the same league as hanging homosexuals.
And I can picture the "God hate Fags" Group strapping on bombs.
I can't see them doing that... they're too cowardly for that. They'd more likely drop their bombs and run rather then "strap them on".
But when they do, they will be hunted, arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced by christians. We take care of our own whack-jobs when they step out of line. The islamic world simply does not look after their own violent fanatics as we do ours.
Drawing this back to the topic of 9-11 truth; Eric Rudolph (the Atlanta Olympics/abortion clinic/gay nightclub bomber Manny mentioned) is also a raging anti-semite with extensive ties to the neo-nazi movement.
I'd bet portions of my own anatomy that he is a 9-11 twoofer.
To answer Rob's questions.
1) Rosie O'Donnell is a rather butch and abrasive talk show host/co-host in the United States whose political views are quite left wing.
2) Rosie and her many of her fans are idiots.
I like the picture at the top of her site.
Perhaps she hadn't read about the folks (who happen to be against the war) discussing how flawed the Lancet study was.
A shame. After she publicly stated that the fraud 'psychic' John Edward was, well, a fraud, I had hopes that she might have some semblence of a functioning brain. Guess not.
This comment has been removed by the author.
A few months back she claimed she didn't know what "911weknow" was. Wow, she must have done some really in depth research. More likely she is just full of hate like the rest of kooks in this gives her something stupid to believe in.
It's very easy to forget that there are Christian militias, guerillas, and terrorist groups in Myanmar, Lebanon (especially active during the civil war), India (which have killed over ten thousand), Northern Ireland (The Troubles killed ~ 1900 innocent people) America (Christian white supremacists, although they've declined in the past decade or so), and the Lord's Resistance Army has been raping and murdering its way across Uganda for almost two decades. The 20th Century had all sorts of murderous fun for just about every ideology and religion on the planet.
Oh and Rosie's voice goes right through me, so I'm just going to quietly file this under one more reason not to pay the lass any notice
Forget the twin towers....i would love for someone to explain to me how WTC building 7 collapsed perfectly into its footprint, when it was not hit by any airplane. Just in case you all forgot, steel melts at roughly 2700 degrees, while the hottest jet fuel fires burn is 1700. How was it that the only 3 modern steel buildings to ever collapse from fire, happen under these circumstances all on the SAME DAY?
If you want some scientific data..check out http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/how-hot.htm
Post a Comment
<< Home