The Crazy Canuck is Back!
Jeff Hill, whose nutty phone calls have provided us with endless amusement gets profiled in a piece on how he's calling people in the Shanksville area:
Hill called McClatchey at her real estate office on Jan. 26 and told her he'd like to order a copy of the photo. He then began questioning her about the photo, gradually asking more aggressive questions about the photo's legitimacy. But throughout the conversation, McClatchey said Hill was very nice.
And, if you're looking for evidence that he should be in the room with pads on the walls, it's here:
He said he first became interested in Sept. 11 theories when he accidentally stumbled across a Web site that claimed Building 7 of the World Trade Center fell too quickly.
Soon he became obsessed with discovering what he describes as “the turth” (sic) about Sept. 11. He said he was put on sick leave from his job at Dell Computers, where he took phone calls for technical assistance.
“Maybe they were afraid I'd start talking to the customers,” he said, which Hill said he never did.
Hill said he was sent to a doctor for psychological help. Doctors said he was “uptight” and “paranoid,” and they prescribed him “happy pills,” which he never took. He said he doesn't know what it would take to get his job back and at present he is in the process of being put on disability.
Labels: Crazy Canuck, Jeff Hill, Phone Calls
18 Comments:
Fuck the Truth Movement, the Turth Movement is where it's at!
Sounds like he was just bucking for disability
Does anybody know, is this Jeff guy "Shure"?
TJ, yeah, I'm pretty sure that's him.
Pat, you missed the most important call.
The local resident who said that Val's photo was faked and she strictly doing it to make money!
Kelly Leverknight, who was one of the witnesses who reportedly saw Flight 93 in the air before it crashed, and speaks to a lady claiming to be Kelly’s daughter. Jeff asks this lady on the phone about Val’s Flight 93 plume photo.
And she states without doubt that it is a fake!
Good old capitalism in Val's case. Never mind the fraud.
http://flight93photo.blogspot.com/2007/03/
shanksville-resident-says-val.html
Well who needs photographic analysis when you've got Kelly Leverknight!
I remember once I got into an argument with a truther about the smoke plume being fake. He said that it could only come from a bomb. I pointed out that mushroom clouds can come from any large exothermic reactions and not just bombs. He refused to believe me and said that what I learn in college is a lie. I told him to get a barrel of gas, some matches and to get back to me on his experiment.
He's probably in a hospital burns ward thanks to you!
And she states without doubt that it is a fake!
She also says that all the conspiracy crap is BS. She also says her mom saw the plane crash and she saw the debris from the plane. So if you believe that the photo is fake, then Flight 93 really crashed there, correct?
The problem with recorded calls, if you don't tell them you are recording them, especially if you are some nut that you don't even know, are not reliable. How do you this lady wasn't just having fun with a nut on the phone? Even if she was telling the truth about the photo, what qualifies her to judge if they are fake or not? Maybe she dislikes Val. Any number of reasons. It proves nothing. If you want to get true answers, you have to be up front, present your purpose, make sure you have the right person on the phone, etc.
He refused to believe me and said that what I learn in college is a lie.
Beautiful! Evidently the whole discipline of physics as it is taught today was put there by the Illuminati to prepare us for the 9/11 Big Lie. Dammit, this thing goes right to the top...
Like hey man, like faster than free fall, whatever that is.
Loose Change! Man, the more change the better!
The problem with recorded calls, if you don't tell them you are recording them, especially if you are some nut that you don't even know, are not reliable.
WHAT?? How do you come to that conclusion? Lets see knowing the call is recorded is going to impact the facts of the call?? Calling the guy a 'nut' is also pointless.
Really that is some terrible logic trying to refute the point that the photo is fake. And to think the FBI believed it too!.
The crazy canuk was upfront and honest. He was calling to find out what they thought of the photo. They said it was a fake. Get over it, move on. We were all duped!
Even if she was telling the truth about the photo, what qualifies her to judge if they are fake or not?
Uhhh because she saw the plane crash which didn't match the photo! Duh!
The crazy canuk was upfront and honest. He was calling to find out what they thought of the photo. They said it was a fake. Get over it, move on. We were all duped!
Swing, sounds like you have been dangling upside down too long. I know you and the Crazy Canuck are not normal, but to a normal person who gets a phone call out of the blue, gives his name, I tell him him I don't know who you are, maybe, just maybe, I'm thinking it could be a prank call and I'm going to have fun with him.
Up front? LOL. Did he tell her that he was going to record the call and put it on the internet?
Uhhh because she saw the plane crash which didn't match the photo! Duh!
It was her daughter, remember?
But Swing, since you believe that she knows the photo was fake, then you must believe that your conspiracy theories are BS and Flight 93 really did crash there. Congratulations!
Did he tell her that he was going to record the call and put it on the internet?
Does it matter? No.
Why are you so opposed to getting at the truth of the situation? You want to believe so hard that the picture is the truth. Why?
Can you post where I said Flight 93 didn't crash?
I've contended it was shot down based upon debris field.
But I'm not going to rehash the facts that lead me to believe that.
Does it matter? No.
Why are you so opposed to getting at the truth of the situation? You want to believe so hard that the picture is the truth. Why?
Sure it matters. For the third time, what if she thought it was a prank call? A total stranger calling out of the blue is not a normal phone call. If you identify yourself, say why you are calling, and tell her that you are recording it to get it on the record, her answers might be totally different. Also, for the second time, she says she is the daughter of Kelly Leverknight. It is is a completely improper and worthless interview that would not be accepted anywhere.
I find it extremely funny how you accept this amateur attempt to gather evidence hook, line and sinker, but you won't accept Osama admitting to his involvement in 911 on a video, after it is verified by experts to be him. It really is laughable.
Hill said he was sent to a doctor for psychological help. Doctors said he was “uptight” and “paranoid,” and they prescribed him “happy pills,” which he never took.
You're right Swing, calling this guy a nut is only stating the obvious.
Is it legal in America to record calls without the person's consent?
Is it legal in America to record calls without the person's consent?
Yes and no. There's no federal law against it, but 12 states have laws requiring that all parties be informed that a call is being recorded.
Pennsylvania is one of those states.
Well if anyone presses charges he can always plead insanity.
Post a Comment
<< Home