Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Dylan Makes an Amazing Discovery

I was so stunned by this admission by Dylan Avery over at the Loose Change Forum, that I had to reply in the thread.

Going through the FOX5 Internet Archive, and at approximately 10:10 AM, Audrey Barnes, a reporter on-site at Arlington, Virginia blurts out:

"Michael, we just heard ANOTHER explosion down here at the Pentagon. We just heard another loud explosion coming from the Pentagon building, just seconds ago. We can't see exactly where the source was but you could hear it very clearly, I'm looking for another plume and can't see any. The second explosion sounded like it came from farther away. I'm being told by people on the scene that a gas station in
Crystal City is involved in a serious fire, a lot of fire equipment is being diverted to that area, you can see there's still emergency crews headed to this area...that's what I'm told."

Is there any truth to this report? I know alot of misinformation was floating around and this is more than likely just another example.

EDIT: Eyewitnesses say a minute later that the Washington Monument was hit. Anyone ever play Telephone?



Wow, so he is actually critically analyzing reports to see if they are accurate? I am impressed. Maybe there is hope for him yet.

Now explain to me once again how inaccurate reports by the BBC that WTC7 had collapsed proves a conspiracy...

Labels:

37 Comments:

At 11 April, 2007 12:47, Blogger Abby Scott said...

You know whenever I wanna get myself good and mad, I think about old buddy Dylan Avery. The hypocrisy of this man knows no limits.

When one makes a documentary, there are usually not 4 or 5 versions. A researcher tries to get it right on the first try. And so many of these glaring errors are so easy to see. And "Yeah, well, they won't be in the next version, so ha!" is not a valid response.

This guy cares much more about being famous and being able to say, "Charlie Sheen has a really nice house." then any true desire to bring anything to light.

And I love, LOVE, how he co-opts hundreds of people into being his free pr firm by commanding them to wear HIS t-shirts and pass out HIS DVD's on september 11th of last year. But as soon as anyone member of this free labor pipes up with concerns, it's "Let me do my job."

 
At 11 April, 2007 12:56, Blogger shawn said...

Hey, at least he's better than Michael Moore (in terms of changing). Moore doesn't get it right the first time around, then never edits out his mistakes.

 
At 11 April, 2007 12:58, Blogger Abby Scott said...

And then he says this:

Why do you insist on relying on personal attacks instead of having an intelligent conversation?

And yet, when I, pre-"911 conspiracy wars" approached him with valid questions about the possible insult that his protest on 9/11/06 could have, how does he respond??? By saying "Here's abby scott! And she takes paxil!"

And where, WHERE, does he acknowledge his mistakes like a man??????

 
At 11 April, 2007 12:59, Blogger Abby Scott said...

My blood? BOILING! BOILING!

 
At 11 April, 2007 13:09, Blogger Unknown said...

Abby,

Except for being on the wrong side of the 9/11 debate, you are such a likable person.

 
At 11 April, 2007 14:01, Blogger freefallspeeds said...

ABBY SCOTT IS A HO!!

SHE'S A HOMO JUST LIKE THE REST OF THE REPUBLICANS!!!

SCREW HER BG. SHES GOING TO PRISON WITH THE REST OF THE ENABLERS VERY SOON!!

HEIL HITLER

 
At 11 April, 2007 14:07, Blogger James B. said...

SHE'S A HOMO JUST LIKE THE REST OF THE REPUBLICANS!!!

SCREW HER BG. SHES GOING TO PRISON WITH THE REST OF THE ENABLERS VERY SOON!!


Hey, lesbian prison movies rule! ;-)

 
At 11 April, 2007 14:37, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

Tell me James. Should we still be using History Books from the early 1900s, simply because the authors had to update it so many times and they obviously couldn't get anything right?

This from the guy who gets most of his "evidence" from the day of the attack.


You're now poking a beehive to see if you'll get stung.

Sounds like he's threatening to send Jackchit after you!

 
At 11 April, 2007 15:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its fantastic watching JamesB get owned on that thread at LC.

James aint getting banned so he actually has to back up his shite LOL

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:00, Blogger CHF said...

What's happening at LC, pd?

Is the new twoofer Prof. Greening puting on a show? Oh wait....

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:20, Blogger Abby Scott said...

I'm a republican now?

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:22, Blogger Alex said...

eh, who really cares. the debate is over. when, 6 years later, these idiots are still arguing that buildings should defy gravity by collapsing at noticably slow speeds, you can pretty much conclude that there's no hope for them.

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:23, Blogger Alex said...

Republican chicks are hot. How 'bout posing in an open combat shirt, holding a shotgun?

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:31, Blogger Abby Scott said...

Republican chicks are hot. How 'bout posing in an open combat shirt, holding a shotgun?

Uh... you first.

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alex, you prepared to concede that greening admitted he was a 911 agnostic yet?

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:37, Blogger James B. said...

Uh... you first.

Didn't I already send you your "Men of 9/11 Debunking" calender?

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

JamesB I notice you have fled the thread at LC. Its so inconvenient when you are asked the difficult questions isn't it?

 
At 11 April, 2007 16:53, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

That's not the only thread he fled:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/7784#comment-132900

What's wrong, Jimbo, kitchen got too hot for yeh?

Now come back and answer our questions, sunshine.

 
At 11 April, 2007 17:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like JamesB is showing his cowardice all over the internet.

His response to the put options issue is just priceless.

 
At 11 April, 2007 17:08, Blogger shawn said...

Did you guys know that if you grow tired of talking to dunces you have to stick with it, even though no amount of reason, evidence, or logic will sway them?

Thanks, Jenny and pdoh!

The more you know! *star comes across the screen and jingle plays*

 
At 11 April, 2007 17:10, Blogger James B. said...

I didn't flee, I had a class on tax accounting to go to. Geez guy, even as a student slacker I can't spend every minute on the net.

 
At 11 April, 2007 17:14, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

I didn't flee, I had a class on tax accounting to go to. Geez guy, even as a student slacker I can't spend every minute on the net.

Okay, in the interests of education I'll let yeh slide--lord knows you need it--but I expect you back SOMETIME today.

Get snappy!

 
At 11 April, 2007 17:40, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

Right, Jimbo, you reponded to Jonny but not me.

I'm calling "chicken". I was nice, gave you some slack, but you're just scared shitless aren't yeh?

No big. I can hear you fine over here:

"cluck, cluck,.."

 
At 11 April, 2007 18:01, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

Well, I take back my "cluck, clucks"--assuming you continue to be responsive at 911Blogger...

PDOH: has he returned to LC?

 
At 11 April, 2007 18:36, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Pdoh:

if your gonna be the schoolyard asshole, you should really get some better material.

TAM:)

 
At 11 April, 2007 18:54, Blogger b. j. edwards said...

"You know whenever I wanna get myself good and mad, I think about old buddy Dylan Avery."

It used to be that unruly kids like Dylan would get a good spanking when they misbehaved and lied.

But that's considered child abuse nowadays.

 
At 11 April, 2007 18:56, Blogger James B. said...

PDoh, what exact complaint do you have to my response regarding options? Have you actually read Poteshman's paper? I am getting tired of having to explain it to you people.

 
At 11 April, 2007 20:05, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

It used to be that unruly kids like Dylan would get a good spanking when they misbehaved and lied.

But that's considered child abuse nowadays.


It used to be that adults set a consistant example by SACKING public figures that screwed up--instead of giving them golden parachutes.

So shut it,ignorant bitch. Kids learn behavior from the adults they watch--so maybe you should be calling for spanking ADULTS?

Oh, but that would be a fair fight--and you'd get your arse handed to you. Coward.

Don't you have "socks" to manage, sad little person? Have you deleted my latest exposure of your pathos? What does that make, 8 attempts to hide your bumbling? I'm surprised you'd return to the scene of the crime--you being the fake "Pat" of the Screw Loose EXPOSED. But then you aren't very bright...

Oi! James! Get back to the thread love--you've posts to reply to--or I start "clucking".

Or I start posting my questions in one of the comments forums here.

Either, or.

But not here--this thread's winding down. I'll do my Darth Rosenberg impression once more:

*sigh*Bored now

But I won't flay you lot alive as I leave--lucky you.

 
At 11 April, 2007 20:13, Blogger Alex said...

Republican chicks are hot. How 'bout posing in an open combat shirt, holding a shotgun?

Uh... you first.


If you're serious, I'm more than willing :p I've got some pics from my army service kicking around....

 
At 11 April, 2007 20:28, Blogger Abby Scott said...

Jenny, you call these guys sad? And use words like "bitch"?

Tell me, is your behavior here helping or hurting your cause?

I have a feeling that most of your "action" consists in the internet.

 
At 11 April, 2007 21:11, Blogger b. j. edwards said...

Discriminatory Language Charges Leveled Against NIST

 
At 11 April, 2007 23:52, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

Hang on a sec... Abby is a republican?

 
At 12 April, 2007 09:42, Blogger Alex said...

Probably not. But I'd rather maintain that particular illusion :)

 
At 12 April, 2007 10:54, Blogger pomeroo said...

Abby wrote to Jenny: "I have a feeling that most of your "action" consists in the internet."

I take this to mean that all the action Jenny gets is on the internet.

 
At 12 April, 2007 13:09, Blogger Manny said...

Probably not. But I'd rather maintain that particular illusion :)

I'm sure you don't mean it, Alex, but some of your responses to Abby seem a little creepy to me.

 
At 12 April, 2007 18:40, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

It used to be that adults set a consistant example by SACKING public figures that screwed up--instead of giving them golden parachutes.

Ah yes, ye good olde days when you could leave all your doors unlocked without having to worry.

 
At 12 April, 2007 19:12, Blogger Alex said...

I'm sure you don't mean it, Alex, but some of your responses to Abby seem a little creepy to me.

"some"? I only posted TWO!

Abby's a big girl and I'm sure she'd speak up if she were offended. Thanks for your observations, but I don't see what's "creepy" about a bit of mild teasing.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home