Dylan Makes an Amazing Discovery
I was so stunned by this admission by Dylan Avery over at the Loose Change Forum, that I had to reply in the thread.
Going through the FOX5 Internet Archive, and at approximately 10:10 AM, Audrey Barnes, a reporter on-site at Arlington, Virginia blurts out:
"Michael, we just heard ANOTHER explosion down here at the Pentagon. We just heard another loud explosion coming from the Pentagon building, just seconds ago. We can't see exactly where the source was but you could hear it very clearly, I'm looking for another plume and can't see any. The second explosion sounded like it came from farther away. I'm being told by people on the scene that a gas station in
Crystal City is involved in a serious fire, a lot of fire equipment is being diverted to that area, you can see there's still emergency crews headed to this area...that's what I'm told."Is there any truth to this report? I know alot of misinformation was floating around and this is more than likely just another example.
EDIT: Eyewitnesses say a minute later that the Washington Monument was hit. Anyone ever play Telephone?
Wow, so he is actually critically analyzing reports to see if they are accurate? I am impressed. Maybe there is hope for him yet.
Now explain to me once again how inaccurate reports by the BBC that WTC7 had collapsed proves a conspiracy...
Labels: Dylan Avery
37 Comments:
You know whenever I wanna get myself good and mad, I think about old buddy Dylan Avery. The hypocrisy of this man knows no limits.
When one makes a documentary, there are usually not 4 or 5 versions. A researcher tries to get it right on the first try. And so many of these glaring errors are so easy to see. And "Yeah, well, they won't be in the next version, so ha!" is not a valid response.
This guy cares much more about being famous and being able to say, "Charlie Sheen has a really nice house." then any true desire to bring anything to light.
And I love, LOVE, how he co-opts hundreds of people into being his free pr firm by commanding them to wear HIS t-shirts and pass out HIS DVD's on september 11th of last year. But as soon as anyone member of this free labor pipes up with concerns, it's "Let me do my job."
Hey, at least he's better than Michael Moore (in terms of changing). Moore doesn't get it right the first time around, then never edits out his mistakes.
And then he says this:
Why do you insist on relying on personal attacks instead of having an intelligent conversation?
And yet, when I, pre-"911 conspiracy wars" approached him with valid questions about the possible insult that his protest on 9/11/06 could have, how does he respond??? By saying "Here's abby scott! And she takes paxil!"
And where, WHERE, does he acknowledge his mistakes like a man??????
My blood? BOILING! BOILING!
Abby,
Except for being on the wrong side of the 9/11 debate, you are such a likable person.
ABBY SCOTT IS A HO!!
SHE'S A HOMO JUST LIKE THE REST OF THE REPUBLICANS!!!
SCREW HER BG. SHES GOING TO PRISON WITH THE REST OF THE ENABLERS VERY SOON!!
HEIL HITLER
SHE'S A HOMO JUST LIKE THE REST OF THE REPUBLICANS!!!
SCREW HER BG. SHES GOING TO PRISON WITH THE REST OF THE ENABLERS VERY SOON!!
Hey, lesbian prison movies rule! ;-)
Tell me James. Should we still be using History Books from the early 1900s, simply because the authors had to update it so many times and they obviously couldn't get anything right?
This from the guy who gets most of his "evidence" from the day of the attack.
You're now poking a beehive to see if you'll get stung.
Sounds like he's threatening to send Jackchit after you!
Its fantastic watching JamesB get owned on that thread at LC.
James aint getting banned so he actually has to back up his shite LOL
What's happening at LC, pd?
Is the new twoofer Prof. Greening puting on a show? Oh wait....
I'm a republican now?
eh, who really cares. the debate is over. when, 6 years later, these idiots are still arguing that buildings should defy gravity by collapsing at noticably slow speeds, you can pretty much conclude that there's no hope for them.
Republican chicks are hot. How 'bout posing in an open combat shirt, holding a shotgun?
Republican chicks are hot. How 'bout posing in an open combat shirt, holding a shotgun?
Uh... you first.
Alex, you prepared to concede that greening admitted he was a 911 agnostic yet?
Uh... you first.
Didn't I already send you your "Men of 9/11 Debunking" calender?
JamesB I notice you have fled the thread at LC. Its so inconvenient when you are asked the difficult questions isn't it?
That's not the only thread he fled:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/7784#comment-132900
What's wrong, Jimbo, kitchen got too hot for yeh?
Now come back and answer our questions, sunshine.
Looks like JamesB is showing his cowardice all over the internet.
His response to the put options issue is just priceless.
Did you guys know that if you grow tired of talking to dunces you have to stick with it, even though no amount of reason, evidence, or logic will sway them?
Thanks, Jenny and pdoh!
The more you know! *star comes across the screen and jingle plays*
I didn't flee, I had a class on tax accounting to go to. Geez guy, even as a student slacker I can't spend every minute on the net.
I didn't flee, I had a class on tax accounting to go to. Geez guy, even as a student slacker I can't spend every minute on the net.
Okay, in the interests of education I'll let yeh slide--lord knows you need it--but I expect you back SOMETIME today.
Get snappy!
Right, Jimbo, you reponded to Jonny but not me.
I'm calling "chicken". I was nice, gave you some slack, but you're just scared shitless aren't yeh?
No big. I can hear you fine over here:
"cluck, cluck,.."
Well, I take back my "cluck, clucks"--assuming you continue to be responsive at 911Blogger...
PDOH: has he returned to LC?
Pdoh:
if your gonna be the schoolyard asshole, you should really get some better material.
TAM:)
"You know whenever I wanna get myself good and mad, I think about old buddy Dylan Avery."
It used to be that unruly kids like Dylan would get a good spanking when they misbehaved and lied.
But that's considered child abuse nowadays.
PDoh, what exact complaint do you have to my response regarding options? Have you actually read Poteshman's paper? I am getting tired of having to explain it to you people.
It used to be that unruly kids like Dylan would get a good spanking when they misbehaved and lied.
But that's considered child abuse nowadays.
It used to be that adults set a consistant example by SACKING public figures that screwed up--instead of giving them golden parachutes.
So shut it,ignorant bitch. Kids learn behavior from the adults they watch--so maybe you should be calling for spanking ADULTS?
Oh, but that would be a fair fight--and you'd get your arse handed to you. Coward.
Don't you have "socks" to manage, sad little person? Have you deleted my latest exposure of your pathos? What does that make, 8 attempts to hide your bumbling? I'm surprised you'd return to the scene of the crime--you being the fake "Pat" of the Screw Loose EXPOSED. But then you aren't very bright...
Oi! James! Get back to the thread love--you've posts to reply to--or I start "clucking".
Or I start posting my questions in one of the comments forums here.
Either, or.
But not here--this thread's winding down. I'll do my Darth Rosenberg impression once more:
*sigh*Bored now
But I won't flay you lot alive as I leave--lucky you.
Republican chicks are hot. How 'bout posing in an open combat shirt, holding a shotgun?
Uh... you first.
If you're serious, I'm more than willing :p I've got some pics from my army service kicking around....
Jenny, you call these guys sad? And use words like "bitch"?
Tell me, is your behavior here helping or hurting your cause?
I have a feeling that most of your "action" consists in the internet.
Discriminatory Language Charges Leveled Against NIST
Hang on a sec... Abby is a republican?
Probably not. But I'd rather maintain that particular illusion :)
Abby wrote to Jenny: "I have a feeling that most of your "action" consists in the internet."
I take this to mean that all the action Jenny gets is on the internet.
Probably not. But I'd rather maintain that particular illusion :)
I'm sure you don't mean it, Alex, but some of your responses to Abby seem a little creepy to me.
It used to be that adults set a consistant example by SACKING public figures that screwed up--instead of giving them golden parachutes.
Ah yes, ye good olde days when you could leave all your doors unlocked without having to worry.
I'm sure you don't mean it, Alex, but some of your responses to Abby seem a little creepy to me.
"some"? I only posted TWO!
Abby's a big girl and I'm sure she'd speak up if she were offended. Thanks for your observations, but I don't see what's "creepy" about a bit of mild teasing.
Post a Comment
<< Home