Saturday, January 16, 2010

Well, There Goes the Meme OBL Ain't Wanted for 9-11

Remember how the Troofers always claimed that Osama wasn't wanted for his role in 9-11? They appeared to have some insane notion that the FBI had no evidence connecting him to the attacks.

Well, the State Department has issued an age-progressed photo of OBL on their "Rewards for Justice" website, along with this note:

Usama bin Ladin is wanted in connection with the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and for the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya.


Update: More here:

"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."


Hat Tip: Billman in the comments.

Labels: ,

90 Comments:

At 16 January, 2010 08:22, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

The FBI and the state department are two different agencies. Perhaps you should have paid a bit more attention at school, you would have known that then.

 
At 16 January, 2010 08:24, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

You know, I was going to post a mock snarky comment about this not being the FBI, And lo and behold, the retarded boron beat me to it. But he, in his brain-dead mouth breathing insanity, really means it.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!

 
At 16 January, 2010 08:25, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

That picture.

Is that a horses ass?

 
At 16 January, 2010 09:12, Anonymous New Yorker said...

The FBI and the state department are two different agencies. Perhaps you should have paid a bit more attention at school, you would have known that then.

Aww, the poor little "truther" is upset that yet another one of his cherished myths gets flushed down the toilet.

 
At 16 January, 2010 09:53, Anonymous RonaldWeak said...

What,pray tell,is a "mock snarky" comment? It appears that PornBoy has been made redundant!

 
At 16 January, 2010 09:59, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 16 January, 2010 10:00, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

The FBI did state that they had no hard evidence linking OBL to 911.

Has this changed? Has new evidence been found? If not then nothing has been debunked. Try again.

 
At 16 January, 2010 10:03, Anonymous New Yorker said...

The FBI did state that they had no hard evidence linking OBL to 911.

False.

Has this changed? Has new evidence been found? If not then nothing has been debunked. Try again.

Aww, the poor little "truther" is upset that yet another one of his cherished myths gets flushed down the toilet.

 
At 16 January, 2010 10:25, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

New Yorker you claim "false" but it is in fact true.

Rex Toombe told Ed Haas they had no hard evidence.

Why do you lie?

 
At 16 January, 2010 10:28, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

Well, you can pretty much guess the twoofer response "they only did this as CYA after the always important and courageous 9/11 twoof movement started asking questions."

Bore-ass gets it wrong as usual, even by twoofer standards. Both agencies are part of the NWO!

 
At 16 January, 2010 10:45, Anonymous New Yorker said...

New Yorker you claim "false" but it is in fact true.

False.

Rex Toombe told Ed Haas they had no hard evidence.

Link?

Why do you lie?

I don't.

 
At 16 January, 2010 10:51, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Here comes "New Yorker" dragging ass from way behind the curve! The fact that Colin Powell promised the world a White Paper laying out exactly how Osama was behind the attacks AND NEVER PRODUCED it means nothing to the addled minds of the Debunker Cult.Onward Christian Soldiers!!

 
At 16 January, 2010 11:31, Anonymous Roman Craig said...

"Rex Toombe told Ed Haas they had no hard evidence."

It's Rex TOMB dipshit and I would love to see the link that says they have no hard evidence.

Walt - why isn't you oyster eating ass out protesting and rioting today? Do they give you turds weekends off?

Boris - still a worthless douchebag I see.

 
At 16 January, 2010 12:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Roman, here's your link.

Maybe if you learned to Google then your opinions wouldn't be so arbitrary and so wrong.

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/

NY is of course in his usual form with his lazy one-word lies.

The OP story is not really a story at all but only based on a straw man framing. The claim was that the FBI said it had no hard evidence. That is what they said.

 
At 16 January, 2010 12:51, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

The predictable Zero from the Cult on the White Paper from the House Negro.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:10, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Roman, here's your link.

Maybe if you learned to Google then your opinions wouldn't be so arbitrary and so wrong.


It's funny when Brian "Petgoat" Good lectures people on being wrong, considering he's never been right about anything before.

NY is of course in his usual form with his lazy one-word lies.

I don't lie, Petgoat.

The OP story is not really a story at all but only based on a straw man framing. The claim was that the FBI said it had no hard evidence. That is what they said.

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:13, Anonymous New Yorker said...

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NY, right, nobody cares that the post under discussion has an illogical headline and an illogical premise.

And nobody cares that when challenged to provide the link showing that the FBI said there was no hard evidence linking Osama to 9/11, I produced the link.

You just heap your cynical lies on the debunker manure pile.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:26, Anonymous New Yorker said...

NY, right, nobody cares that the post under discussion has an illogical headline and an illogical premise.

False. There is nothing illogical about the headline or premise.

And nobody cares that when challenged to provide the link showing that the FBI said there was no hard evidence linking Osama to 9/11, I produced the link.

False. There was nothing in that link suggesting the FBI doubts bin Laden was behind the attack.

You just heap your cynical lies on the debunker manure pile.

Seek professional help, Petgoat.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:41, Blogger Billman said...

The FBI and the state department are two different agencies. Perhaps you should have paid a bit more attention at school, you would have known that then.

So basically, what the troofers are saying it doesn't that the government is saying Osama Bin Laden is wanted for the 9/11 attacks, it matters through WHAT AGENCY they say it through. It HAS to be the FBI. The State Department doesn't matter...

Even though, in this case, it's usually the state department that handles matters of extradition for wanted criminals...

NOPE! IT HAS TO BE THE FBI OR 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

You guys are complete fucking retards...

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:45, Blogger Billman said...

So if the... department of education has no hard evidence connect Osama Bin Laden to 9/11... that makes it an inside job?

Wouldn't the CIA or the STATE DEPARTMENT handle the international issues of terrorism against the U.S. rather than the FBI (hint: the F stands for FEDERAL) who handles internal issues? Yeah the FBI would investigate 9/11 as far as what happened INSIDE THE U.S. but as for Osama Bin Laden...

Oh, but he doesn't have his most wanted picture with the caption "WANTED FOR 9/11" so 9/11 must be an inside job!

Again... you guys are complete fucking morons.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:45, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Now get the bone headed logic behind the truthers thinking on this matter. The FBI didn't put OBL on the wanted list because he didn't do it, the government did it. Of course the FBI could make him their most wanted man because of 9/11 with a stroke of a pen there by cutting the conspiracy theorist off at the knees but they don't. Why??? Because he didn't do 9/11, you don't want to accuse an innocent man, even if you already murdered 3000 people. Rules are rules.

A thinking person (non-truthers) would think "what difference does it make, he is wanted for other terror acts, he has confessed to 9/11. If captured he will be treated like the guy who did 9/11. The rest is just paperwork, meaningless to anyone but bunch of simple dolts who have instilled into it deep meaning do a big conspiracy.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:47, Blogger Billman said...

The predictable Zero from the Cult on the White Paper from the House Negro.

So you're a racist, too... big surprise.

 
At 16 January, 2010 13:49, Blogger Billman said...

And nobody cares that when challenged to provide the link showing that the FBI said there was no hard evidence linking Osama to 9/11, I produced the link.

And YOU don't care that there was nothing in that link suggesting the FBI has any doubts that Osama bin Laden was behind the attack...

You don't even read your own fucking shit.

MORONS. RETARDS.

I heard Star Trek Online is coming out soon, maybe you losers could focus on that for awhile and actually accomplish something to give meaning to your pathetic lives.

Anyway, back to the Debunker Cult head quarters...

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:03, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

I am wondering if putting OBL on the FBI list would offer him certain federal legal rights if captured by the FBI.

Picture OBL walks into FBI headquarters, "arrest me, you want me for 9/11" "well no WE don't want you but we know some guys who do, you wait right here" No legal issues, no reading of rights, no lawyer, no paperwork. OBL ends up in CIA limbo.

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:03, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"pdoherty76 said...
The FBI did state that they had no hard evidence linking OBL to 911."

No they didn't, moron.

Why do you lie?

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:05, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
Here comes "New Yorker" dragging ass from way behind the curve!"

Here comes assholio poking his head out from under the rock!

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAA!!!!


" The fact that Colin Powell promised the world a White Paper laying out exactly how Osama was behind the attacks AND NEVER PRODUCED it"

Ooooo, an out and out lie.

Why do you lie so?

"the Debunker Cult"

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.


Fucking moron.

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:06, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"The OP story is not really a story at all but only based on a straw man framing. The claim was that the FBI said it had no hard evidence. That is what they said."

No, they didn't.

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:19, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris is back! Heh Boris - did you get a job, yet?

OT - there's much fun to be had over at http://www.craigmurray.org.uk

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:29, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NY, both the premise and the headline of the article are illogical. The headline assumes that the fact that the State Dept wants bin Laden has removed the fact that the FBI said they have no hard evidence connecting him to 9/11. It doesn't.

The premise: "Troofers always claimed that Osama wasn't wanted for his role in 9-11? They appeared to have some insane notion that the FBI had no evidence connecting him to the attacks" is also illogical. The FBI said there was no evidence, so the notion is not insane at all. And once again, this has nothing to do with State.

You're a liar, NY. The link quotes Mr. Tomb: "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

You seem to get some satisfaction out of lying on the internet. I find it such a cynical waste of your life that I seriously question your mental health.

Billman, your "it has to be the FBI or it's inside job!" framing is faulty. The issue is a simple fact: The FBI said it had no hard evidence linking Osama to 9/11. You guys always want to leap to the conclusion, and you love to climb a heap of straw men to make the leap.

DK, removing the FBI statement in no way cuts the conspiracy theorists off at the knees. You guys could not get away with logic like your outside of the warm, fuzzy, supportive environment you have here.

Billman, LL, the link quoted Mr. Tomb: "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” You're not starting to believe NY's bullshit are you?

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:34, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Patrick from Cincinnati said...
Boris is back! Heh Boris - did you get a job, yet?"

Yes, and cleaning the deep frying such a challanging a satisfactory job!

-boron

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:35, Anonymous New Yorker said...

NY, both the premise and the headline of the article are illogical. The headline assumes that the fact that the State Dept wants bin Laden has removed the fact that the FBI said they have no hard evidence connecting him to 9/11. It doesn't.

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

The premise: "Troofers always claimed that Osama wasn't wanted for his role in 9-11? They appeared to have some insane notion that the FBI had no evidence connecting him to the attacks" is also illogical. The FBI said there was no evidence, so the notion is not insane at all. And once again, this has nothing to do with State.

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

You're a liar, NY. The link quotes Mr. Tomb: "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

You seem to get some satisfaction out of lying on the internet. I find it such a cynical waste of your life that I seriously question your mental health.

I'm really pissing you off, huh Petgoat? You know, a psychiatrist would be able to help you with your anger issues.

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:41, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

".... the fact that the State Dept wants bin Laden has removed the fact that the FBI said they have no hard evidence connecting him to 9/11."

Why do you lie so much, boron?

"The FBI said there was no evidence"

No they didn't.

Another lie, boron.

"Billman, your "it has to be the FBI or it's inside job!" framing is faulty."

No it's not, it's the crazy Twoooofer™ illogic you use all the time, boron.

"The FBI said it had no hard evidence linking Osama to 9/11."

Another lie.

"You guys always want to leap to the conclusion,"

Hey you're the lying conspiracy mongering, America hating fucktard, boron.

"Billman, LL, the link quoted Mr. Tomb: "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” You're not starting to believe NY's bullshit are you?"

Stop lying. boron, you're getting boring.

Excuse me.

You're ALWAYS boring. But you keep coming up with new and even more illogical lies to keep us amused.


Now, what does "FAE" stand for, boron?

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:45, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"You're a liar, NY. The link quotes Mr. Tomb: "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

And once again Brian proves himself an idiot

DUH you do understand what is meant by "HARD EVIDENCE"

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:46, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

Arhoolie said...The predictable Zero from the Cult on the White Paper from the House Negro.

There is a revealing statement. No wonder most neo-Nazis and white supremecists are twoofers!

 
At 16 January, 2010 14:59, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, NY, it pisses me off when people lie about 9/11.

You guys are down to lying to each other about obvious checkable facts. Interesting.

Actually I'm finding that in other forums too. It suggests to me that the debunker movement is about to collapse under the weight of its faulty assumptions, ignorance, and lies.

 
At 16 January, 2010 15:04, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Actually I'm finding that in other forums too. It suggests to me that the debunker movement is about to collapse under the weight of its faulty assumptions, ignorance, and lies."

Been hearing that for 20 years or more. And from the conspiracy of the day loons.

Face it debunkers are just smart people who piss dumb people like you off. There will always be purveyors of bunk, 9/11 just happens to be the one you are in to. And we debunkers will always be there to laugh at you.

 
At 16 January, 2010 15:05, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Yes, NY, it pisses me off when people lie about 9/11.

Well, except for the lies you tell, because, well, because you're Brian Good! Reality is whatever you say it is!

Please see a psychiatrist.

You guys are down to lying to each other about obvious checkable facts. Interesting.

False.

Actually I'm finding that in other forums too. It suggests to me that the debunker movement is about to collapse under the weight of its faulty assumptions, ignorance, and lies.

Heh, "just you wait, gentlemen". Brian was babbling about how he would be redeemed when everyone at DU laughed at him for his idiotic "rake on rake" and "meatball on a fork" drawings. How's that coming along, Brian?

 
At 16 January, 2010 15:38, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Real debunkers don't find it necessary to lie.

Also, when you've really debunked something, you move on to debunking something else. The fact that you guys are still out there day after day piling your lies on top of your straw men to leap for your false conclusions show that you haven't debunked.

 
At 16 January, 2010 15:44, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Real debunkers don't find it necessary to lie.

Nobody who has a solid case find the need to lie, so why is it that the "truth" movement lies, clings to half-truths, and splits hairs so desperately?

This whole "The FBI doesn't want bin Laden" stuff is a perfect example. You're desperate and will cling to anything, no matter how pathetic.

Also, when you've really debunked something, you move on to debunking something else. The fact that you guys are still out there day after day piling your lies on top of your straw men to leap for your false conclusions show that you haven't debunked.

Yes, everything the "truth" movement came up with has been debunked. This is why we're just pointing and laughing at ignorant lunatics like you at this point. I lose interest in this blog when you aren't here posting your unintentionally hilarious nonsense.

 
At 16 January, 2010 15:52, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Also, when you've really debunked something, you move on to debunking something else."

Unlike the truthers we are not one trick ponies, I debunk creationist crap too, along with pseudo science bullshit, I have pointed out the failings of Silvia Browne.

And you know what I find guys like you tend to believe in this shit too.

 
At 16 January, 2010 16:18, Blogger Triterope said...

That picture. Is that a horses ass?

No, that's the honest-to-God Boris Epstein, a long-running Truther poster who has returned to SLC after a long hiatus. (I suspect it's because of the recent switch to blogger.com comments where people can't impersonate him. Amirite, Boris?)

Stay tuned, Lazarus. If you've enjoyed the entertainment so far, you'll love this guy.

 
At 16 January, 2010 18:43, Blogger Billman said...

Billman, LL, the link quoted Mr. Tomb: "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” You're not starting to believe NY's bullshit are you?

Oops. I read the wrong link! I must have not pressed control c before I pressed control v. Going back I read the right one, so you got me there. Mistake on my part.

THIS is the link I read..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700687.html

In which REX TOMB says:

"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."

So now what? You wanna qoute somebody when they say something that goes with your theory, and ignore them when they say something that doesn't?

Or did you just FORGET Rex Tomb also said that?

Typical troofer... lying.

 
At 16 January, 2010 21:22, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Stay tuned, Lazarus. If you've enjoyed the entertainment so far, you'll love this guy.

Well, I just gave a once-over on Boris Epstein's blog, and in addition to the usual "truth" crap, there's anti-vaccination paranoia, and a post that suggests housing homeless people in derelict buildings in depopulated cities like Flint (yeah, I'm sure you thought that one through real well, Boris).

His writing also has that Brian Good-esque tone to it where he sees himself as a lot smarter than he actually is. You're right, Triterope, this is probably going to be a lot of fun....

 
At 17 January, 2010 05:55, Blogger Billman said...

Oh... no smug comments Anonymous? Arhoolie?

 
At 17 January, 2010 07:29, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

Stay tuned, Lazarus. If you've enjoyed the entertainment so far, you'll love this guy.

Yeah, Bore-ass is a real piece of work. He is the stereotypical twoofer, a complete loser in life, so he blames his inadequacies on the NWO. He is also eager to get personal information on other posters, which suggests he is probably a stalker.

 
At 17 January, 2010 10:44, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Back for you now Billdo! Quoting one of the great African-American activists of the 20th Century hardly qualifies as racist.Except maybe in the upside down world of the Debunker Cult.Sorry,Chief,but you ought to get out and make friends with some Black folks and see for yourself what they think about the lamentable Mr.Powell.Your boy Rush the Crankhead is the one who's racist.Where's Ronald the Weak and yourself when Rush intermittently explodes with his hate speech?

 
At 17 January, 2010 10:49, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Look at the bright side,Billdo you young Sad Sack,now you're the Debunker Cult's hat check boy! I guess you've replaced Troyd'oh.Look out,"New Yorker" is gaining fast with a flurry of volume that is really quite impressive!

 
At 17 January, 2010 12:00, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"the Debunker Cult"

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Over and over and over and over again, and you can be an insane OCD Twoooofer™ with no grasp of sanity or reality.

 
At 17 January, 2010 13:09, Blogger Billman said...

Back for you now Billdo! Quoting one of the great African-American activists of the 20th Century hardly qualifies as racist.

Uh, huh.. unless you yourself are black, you kind of can't say that word and get away with it. But it's semantics really.

Except maybe in the upside down world of the Debunker Cult.

Where we sacrifice chickens to the NWO gods and then incinerate the bodies with thermite.

Sorry,Chief,but you ought to get out and make friends with some Black folks

Yeah.. I have many. And whenever the topic of wether white people can say that word around them comes up, it's always pretty much "no."

and see for yourself what they think about the lamentable Mr.Powell.

Does anyone really like Powell? What are you trying to prove?

Your boy Rush the Crankhead is the one who's racist.

Rush... Limbaugh? He's MY BOY, now? Not in the slightest...

Where's Ronald the Weak and yourself when Rush intermittently explodes with his hate speech?

I think I heard that he and Bill O'Reilly are going off about Harry Ried saying that... but I haven't paid attention.

Really, the focus is on YOU saying it:
The predictable Zero from the Cult on the White Paper from the House Negro.

Perhaps you could clairfy what you mean with context next time. Oh wait... troofers don't know what context means except when they takes things out of it...

Look at the bright side,Billdo

There was a dark side at some point?

you young Sad Sack,

31 is young to you? How ancient are you, then?

now you're the Debunker Cult's hat check boy!

I guess that means a better parking space at NWO meetings?

I guess you've replaced Troyd'oh.

Sure.. good luck trying to get anything on me, though.

Look out,"New Yorker" is gaining fast with a flurry of volume that is really quite impressive!

Please, if anything, New Yorker pisses you off a lot more regularly than I have time for. So he should earn your coveted title of Debunker Cult Hat Checker.

 
At 17 January, 2010 13:46, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Your problem is with Harry Belafonte and the vast majority of Black Americans.I understand that you are a hapless,desperate shill for an untenable position.By the way,since you are so good at responding neatly and all in a row:how come nothing on Anthony Shaffer,the silence from you boobs has been thundering!

 
At 17 January, 2010 13:57, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

I think Boris has shown up because he would no longer be the stupidest truther here. He can in fact look down on Brian Good and spacebar boy! A major achievement in his life.

 
At 17 January, 2010 14:05, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
Your problem is with Harry Belafonte and the vast majority of Black Americans.I understand that you are a hapless,desperate shill for an untenable position.By the way,since you are so good at responding neatly and all in a row:how come nothing on Anthony Shaffer,the silence from you boobs has been thundering!"\

Does any sane person around here know WTF assholio is trying to say in that turd of unconnected verbiage?

 
At 17 January, 2010 14:06, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Dave Kyte said...
I think Boris has shown up because he would no longer be the stupidest truther here."


I think Boris showed up becasue of a work release program.

 
At 17 January, 2010 14:07, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Sorry,Chief,but you ought to get out and make friends with some Black folks"

Well than, come see me in Detroit, I will show you around, have some friends who know how to treat a white kid who sees himself as a blue eyed soul brother because he listen to rap music.

Arhoolie, the 9/11 truth movement's house wigger.

 
At 17 January, 2010 14:19, Blogger Triterope said...

I think Boris showed up becasue of a work release program.

I still say it's the switch to blogger comments where he can't be impersonated. The guy was mortified whenever anyone posted the most obvious spoof under whatever handle he was using that nanosecond. He kept changing his name to "stay ahead of the impersonators" or some such silliness.

 
At 17 January, 2010 14:24, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Let's see, Harry Belafonte (who cares, seriously?) uses a slur against Colin Powell, and that legitimizes it in Spacebar Guy's mind because, um, because Belafonte is famous or something?

I can't wait for his assertion that Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world. After all, Mel Gibson said so!

 
At 17 January, 2010 14:26, Blogger Triterope said...

Arhoolie, the 9/11 truth movement's house wigger.

Hardly. Between Dylan Avery's hip-hop soundtrack artists, the "world's longest freestyle rap" guy, and the parade of indistinguishable suburban whiteboy mall rappers that have shown up to perform at truther events over the years, he's got a lot of competition for that gig.

 
At 17 January, 2010 15:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Arhoolie
But I thought Anthony Shaffer was "old news."

 
At 17 January, 2010 19:17, Blogger Billman said...

Your problem is with Harry Belafonte

The guy who sang Day-O and Shake Senora?

I understand that you are a hapless,desperate shill

Who am I shilling for, exactly?

since you are so good at responding neatly and all in a row:

Jealous of my ability to use a spacebar?

how come nothing on Anthony Shaffer,the silence from you boobs has been thundering!

THUNDERING CRUSHED-NESS!

 
At 17 January, 2010 19:41, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"....how come nothing on Anthony Shaffer,the silence from you boobs has been thundering!"

Well, I've never heard of Anthony Shaffer, and I'm sure no one else gives a flying fuck about Anthony Shaffer.

Whoever he is.

 
At 17 January, 2010 23:47, Anonymous Anonymous said...

silly

 
At 18 January, 2010 01:31, Anonymous Truedat said...

Billdo!

ahahahahhahaaa

 
At 18 January, 2010 05:29, Blogger Billman said...

Billdo!

ahahahahhahaaa


Even I admit that's pretty funny.

 
At 18 January, 2010 09:02, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Is there abigger buffoon on the Planet Earth than the Hick from Shitsville,USA? Doubtful.Now he lurches forward to assert that we are "wiggers" (a racist tag if we ever heard one).Is that a White guy acting like a nigger? Is that what you mean? They used to call you a "nigger-lover" when I was growing up if you hung with Blacks or defended them.Now,it's "wigger".Onward and upward for the Christian Soldiers!! I'll stick with Harry Belafonte,who nailed Colin Powell to the wall where he remains to this day,a vital cog in an evil wheel.

 
At 18 January, 2010 14:52, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Arhoolie said...
Is there abigger buffoon on the Planet Earth than the Hick from Shitsville,USA?"

Well, yeah.

You, assholio.

 
At 18 January, 2010 21:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Billman, of course once a furor was raised about Rex Tomb's "no hard evidence" they had to op a spin story. And note that the spin story dishonestly framed the issue as conspiracy theorist's suspicions instead of Mr. Tomb's statement.

Note the story did not even quote Tomb's statement, nor did it credit TPM with the legwork. Note also that Tomb never repudiated the quote. He said "no hard evidence". That's a fact, and remains a fact.

 
At 19 January, 2010 03:10, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Bottom line: a truther called Ed Haas took the following statement by an FBI official - 'There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."' - and turned it into an admission that the Feds had no evidence on OBL and 9/11. Either Haarse is a retard with the reading age of a two-year old, or he's a fucking liar.

'but you ought to get out and make friends with some Black folks'

Does that include the buddies you served with during your mythical three-year tour of Iraq?

 
At 19 January, 2010 06:31, Blogger Billman said...

Billman, of course once a furor was raised about Rex Tomb's "no hard evidence" they had to op a spin story.

That's what you're gonna go with, huh? Ok...

Well, you know now he actually never said 'NO HARD EVIDENCE' and that the truthers made that up. Unless you can find a link from a non-prison-planet or truther website that says otherwise.


And note that the spin story dishonestly framed the issue as conspiracy theorist's suspicions instead of Mr. Tomb's statement.

Wow, the NWO gets around...

Note the story did not even quote Tomb's statement,

Cause he never said it. The truthers only say he did.


nor did it credit TPM with the legwork. Note also that Tomb never repudiated the quote. He said "no hard evidence". That's a fact, and remains a fact.

It's a lie, and you continue to attempt to perpetuate it here after 8 and a half years. STILL NO ARRESTS OR JUSTICE, so good job bringing these things up.

 
At 19 January, 2010 06:50, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Billman, of course once a furor was raised about Rex Tomb's "no hard evidence" they had to op a spin story.

Another mindless assertion from an increasingly desperate Brian Good....

And note that the spin story dishonestly framed the issue as conspiracy theorist's suspicions instead of Mr. Tomb's statement.

It is.

He said "no hard evidence". That's a fact, and remains a fact.

Stop lying, Petgoat.

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:44, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

When the Sack of Deadballs gets a hold of your leg it's tough getting him off!! Good God,you are a real simpleton!

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Saa, you're lying. Ed Haas's report was before the WaPo report. Rez Tomb said "no hard evidence". With such tactics you may fool each other, but anyone who's new to the material will check out the links and see that you and NY are lying and I'm telling the truth.

Billman, you're wrong. This is one of the ways disinfo gets propagated. A real story gets covered over by a second story, and then liars like Saa claim the real story doesn't exist. The Ed Haas story was June 6. http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/

Rex Tomb said "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

The WaPo article was August 27.

 
At 19 January, 2010 13:22, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Saa, you're lying. Ed Haas's report was before the WaPo report. Rez Tomb said "no hard evidence".

False.

With such tactics you may fool each other, but anyone who's new to the material will check out the links and see that you and NY are lying and I'm telling the truth.

We don't lie, Petgoat.

Billman, you're wrong. This is one of the ways disinfo gets propagated. A real story gets covered over by a second story, and then liars like Saa claim the real story doesn't exist. The Ed Haas story was June 6. http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

Rex Tomb said "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

False.

 
At 19 January, 2010 14:53, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Saa, you're lying. Ed Haas's report was before the WaPo report. Rez (sic) Tomb said "no hard evidence".'

So why did no one else report it, you fuckwit? Are you saying that every other journo in the USA is covering up the fact that the FBI has 'no evidence' on OBL's complicity in 9/11, and Mr Haarsehole is the only one telling
'da troof'?

Knob.

 
At 19 January, 2010 15:20, Blogger Triterope said...

Anonymous said...

Saa, you're lying.


PICK A FUCKING HANDLE, BRIAN. I'm not going to wade through every "Anonymous" post trying to figure out which ones are yours.

 
At 19 January, 2010 15:41, Anonymous New Yorker said...

PICK A FUCKING HANDLE, BRIAN. I'm not going to wade through every "Anonymous" post trying to figure out which ones are yours.

Yeah, I didn't realize one of the anonymous posters was Brian yesterday because he was so hysterical. Normally he's pretty easy to identify by his writing style.

"NY, your claims that the NIST report have answered all questions are not based in fact. If you could learn to google, you might learn this."

"Saa, it is not illogical to believe both MIHOP and LIHOP. You girls are all style, no substance."

...and so on.

 
At 19 January, 2010 17:47, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NY, any writing style distinctive enough to be recognized is easily counterfeited--did you ever think of that?

 
At 19 January, 2010 19:42, Blogger Triterope said...

NY, any writing style distinctive enough to be recognized is easily counterfeited

For sure, Brian Good's writing style can be mimicked.

But not his logic.

I couldn't come with crap as outrageous as "smoldering carpets" and "meatball on a fork" and the other things Brian puts forth on a daily basis if I went on a three-day Las Vegas drug bender with the entire writing staff of Family Guy.

 
At 19 January, 2010 20:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, I'll bite. Smoldering carpets make a lot of smoke, so the implication is obvious.

What's "meatball on a fork"?

 
At 19 January, 2010 20:48, Anonymous New Yorker said...

NY, any writing style distinctive enough to be recognized is easily counterfeited--did you ever think of that?

Yes.

What's "meatball on a fork"?

Brian Good thinks that the debris from the collapsed top of the WTC towers should have gotten caught up in the core of the structure, rather than causing it to collapse entirely, much like a meatball sits on a fork.

No, it doesn't make any sense to me either, and it didn't make any sense to the people at Democratic Underground who laughed at him when he posted it there:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x205525

Brian Good is petgoat. Those drawings he did are unintentionally hilarious too. They don't tell us anything about 9/11, but they sure tell us about his mental state.

 
At 20 January, 2010 12:42, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Poor Dave!!! Racist white trash and proud of it!!! Don't you jes' know that he and Troy will be at the next 9/11 skeptics conference filming for youtube? The nutcases from the Valley of Neander will be in a real danger of being smacked silly if they do.

 
At 20 January, 2010 16:00, Blogger Billman said...

Poor Dave!!! Racist white trash and proud of it!!! Don't you jes' know that he and Troy will be at the next 9/11 skeptics conference filming for youtube? The nutcases from the Valley of Neander will be in a real danger of being smacked silly if they do.

Fuck it. I'll go. Just to see who attempts to smack who silly.

 
At 21 January, 2010 11:00, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Great Bilbo,you can all come in your "We're the Parasitic Debunker Cult" T-shirts!!!

 
At 21 January, 2010 11:48, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"the Parasitic Debunker Cult"

And Krazee, the Gormless Wonder Klown™ veers off into another alleyway in the insane drug addled sponge he calls a mind.

Good job, Krazee, good job.

Now go clean the deep fryers, they're filthy.

 
At 21 January, 2010 23:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, well, after some thought...

If smouldering carpets is a theory for how you can get a whole hell of a lot of smoke without a whole hell of a lot of fire, that sounds pretty reasonable to me.

And if most of the structural resistance of the towers was concentrated in the core, while most of the mass was suspended in the concrete floors (particularly in the upper regions of the towers where the core was very light) then the meatball on the fork metaphor sounds pretty worthy of consideration to me.

 
At 22 January, 2010 06:45, Anonymous New Yorker said...

OK, well, after some thought...

If smouldering carpets is a theory for how you can get a whole hell of a lot of smoke without a whole hell of a lot of fire, that sounds pretty reasonable to me.

And if most of the structural resistance of the towers was concentrated in the core, while most of the mass was suspended in the concrete floors (particularly in the upper regions of the towers where the core was very light) then the meatball on the fork metaphor sounds pretty worthy of consideration to me.


Of course they sound reasonable to you, Brian. You're the lunatic who came up with them. You should really explain them to a psychiatrist, as it will aid in their diagnosis so they can help you on your way to a normal life.

 
At 23 January, 2010 16:45, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Try dealing with the issues, NY, instead of an ad hominem attack against a phantom.

 
At 23 January, 2010 20:20, Blogger Billman said...

Try dealing with the issues, NY, instead of an ad hominem attack against a phantom.

But that's part of the fun of this place.

If you're butthurt about it though, I can direct you to this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/7771818/Butt-Hurt-Report-Form

Fill it out and I'll file it with the NWO for you.

 
At 24 January, 2010 12:15, Blogger Billman said...

Not sure if anyone is interested in this still, but here's more about the FBI and so called "No hard evidence" about Bin Laden:

http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress02/watson020602.htm

Of special note is the "The evidence linking Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden to the attacks of September 11 is clear and irrefutable." statement on this page.

 
At 27 January, 2010 10:34, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Have you ever seen pom Pom Girl on cable TV? He's the one with the oily demeanor and the Curtis E.LeMay button.He's also a big defender of death squads and CIA manuals on how to snuff out peasant villages!!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home