Thursday, July 15, 2010

The Return of Jason Robo

Remember the idiot who caused a flight to be delayed by putting up "9-11 Was an Inside Job" stickers on the plane? Well, he's back with a whiny post at Flogger on how mean everybody was to him:

The power to the belt and all nearby lighting was cut off as they encircled me. I was huddled around as some of them asked, “You're the sticker guy right? Jason Robo?” I didn't respond as another barked, “get him up!” as I was quickly seized by the arms, lifted up and thrown against the sides of the baggage claim.

I didn't exactly go limp and initially flexed my muscles to prevent the twisting of my limbs. The goons muttered to me to resist and how much they would love that. I could feel a surge of bad vibes as I thought of the boy in Ozark, Missouri tased 19 times while he inexplicably lay with a broken back on the shoulder of a freeway beneath an overpass. This was motivation enough to submit at the time.

They lifted me up and started taking me away, I asked where they were taking me, if I was under arrest and on what charge. Not being read my rights or informed of any charge I then proclaimed that the arrest was a joke as I was thrown in the back of a cruiser. The situation made me a bit uneasy with my understanding of the Military Commissions Act and other supposed law that allowed me to be declared an enemy combatant, disappeared, subject to extreme rendition, torture and even death without anyone ever learning my fate.


If you don't deserve it, Jason, who does? Unfortunately, as you can probably guess, his understanding of the Military Commissions Act was flawed.

When I arrived at court my lawyer informed me that the prosecution was willing to settle. It was a dismissal based upon not getting in trouble in between then and my trial date, July 8, six months from then. Unable to sustain a drawn out legal battle without more donations I conceded to the terms, somewhat regrettably so. It did not seem that any discussion of the events of September 11, 2001 would be allowed in the court room. Perhaps if that was the case I would have had to live with my grandmother to deal with a trial. I don't like settlements, but financially I couldn't bear the cost.


However, as you can probably guess, the moron did not manage to keep out of trouble:

The fun wasn't over yet though and on my flight home from Boston to San Francisco I raised the attention of security again on my first short connecting flight to Pittsburgh. I was reading the book “The Big Wedding” by Sander Hicks on the intelligence network connections that were involved in the events of 9/11/2010. Flight 93 was mentioned in the book, which had a debris field characteristic of being shot down by a missile rather than crashing. The plane went down in Pennsylvania outside of Shanksville.

I did not have a clue of the geography in the area so it seemed a completely innocent question to ask the flight attendant. On some flights there is a monitor up with the location on a map showing the progress of the flight. The young lady who fielded my inquiry, half an hour before landing in Pittsburgh, had no clue what Flight 93 was or even heard of Shanksville. At the mention of 9/11 her face transformed from a blank stare to being clearly alarmed. I was unconvincingly assured that she would find out the answer as she hurried away.

It was not long after that the captain came over the speaker telling the passengers to make sure they are prepared for a possible emergency landing in Pittsburgh. He told us that the brakes were not working, but there was two backup brake systems and assured us we will likely be okay. As we landed on the runway there was a wide array of emergency personnel. Is this a coincidence? I am too educated to assume that it was.

As soon as we docked at the gate I was swiftly escorted off the aircraft by Pennsylvania State Troopers and TSA officials. It will likely be the only time in my life that I am the first person off the plane. I was not taken into holding of any sort but isolated in the terminal and surrounded by a dozen plus security agents from various entities. They questioned me as to what I said to the flight attendant and I told them exactly what happened.


No charges were filed so Robo's earlier charges were dismissed. But the freaking retard shows no signs of remorse for all the people he frightened and inconvenienced.

Labels:

125 Comments:

At 15 July, 2010 12:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

His story sounds, like...well, a story!

I would bet very little, if any, of it went down the way he claims.
He is a TWOOFER, after all. They lie!

 
At 15 July, 2010 12:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Above by DogTown

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:20, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

The Stupid is strong in this one, Obiwan.

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:43, Blogger avicenne said...

"I could feel a surge of bad vibes..."

Now you know how your fellow passengers and the flight crew whose jobs you make even more difficult feel when they realise there's a nut on board the plane.

This guy is like a child. He continually does what everyone knows you should never ever do, i.e. play the fool on a flight or at an airport, then whines and no doubt lies about "a continual harassment by the flight attendant" and how "she took her sweet time finding me seating."

Here's a news flash, - it's not the job of flight attendants to wait hand and foot on morons who stalk airport terminals looking to "engage in taboo conversation."

 
At 15 July, 2010 14:23, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

Goofy guy,but the embrace of the police state excess is vintage Debunker Cult insanity.You guys are less than weasels.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:30, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie Vanunu said...
Goofy guy,but the embrace of the police state excess is vintage Debunker Cult insanity.You guys are less than weasels."

The systemization of the culture industry invests itself in the illusion of the marginal. Yet a recently published report on the relationship between the appropriation of metaphoric substitution and the reinscription of corporeality may seem impressive to the uninitiated. A suggestive observation concerning the relationship between the fragmentation of the literary canon and the reading of the gaze does much to further understanding of this important topic.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:35, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No charges were filed so Robo's earlier charges were dismissed. But the freaking retard shows no signs of remorse for all the people he frightened and inconvenienced.

Fightened? By a sticker?

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, has Cheney croaked yet?

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:45, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
No charges were filed so Robo's earlier charges were dismissed. But the freaking retard shows no signs of remorse for all the people he frightened and inconvenienced.

Fightened? By a sticker?"

Frightened? By a wild eyed lunatic asking about where one of the hijacked planes crashed on 9/11?

Are you fucking stupid or what?

Oh.

Never mind.

You are.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I can't tell you.

But one thing's for certain--you're brain dead.

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you pathetic weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:46, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Hey, has Cheney croaked yet?"

How about your Momma? Has she killed herself because she whelped you?

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I'll bet a month's pay that her @$$hole is still smarting from that whelpin'.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:06, Blogger Triterope said...

I was reading the book “The Big Wedding” by Sander Hicks. Flight 93 was mentioned in the book

What kind of sick fuck brings a plane crash book on a plane trip?

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:32, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"What kind of sick fuck brings a plane crash book on a plane trip?"

A truther.

 
At 15 July, 2010 18:34, Anonymous paul w said...

"which had a debris field characteristic of being shot down by a missile rather than crashing"


Sigh. The 9/11 conspiracy will never end.

 
At 15 July, 2010 19:39, Blogger Triterope said...

A truther.

It was more of a rhetorical question, but... yeah.

 
At 16 July, 2010 07:10, Blogger angrysoba said...

I was reading the book “The Big Wedding” by Sander Hicks on the intelligence network connections that were involved in the events of 9/11/2010.

Sounds like foreknowledge to me. I think our little Truther friend may know something and should be apprehended and, I dunno, waterboarded until we find out what he knows is going to happen on the ninth anniversary of 9/11!

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:17, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

The Debunker Cult in all its glory,outraged by.......... a guy talking and reading.To hell with James Madison,Thomas Jefferson,Frederick Douglass,Benjamin Franklin and all the people who died defending our freedoms,right morons? Paddy the Hack gets additional bonus points for jerking off to his Police State poster in public!! "Remorse"?!?! How low can you bring it,Paddy?

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:40, Blogger Triterope said...

The Debunker Cult in all its glory,outraged by a guy talking and reading.

Swing and a miss.

 
At 16 July, 2010 11:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...a guy talking and reading.To hell with James Madison,Thomas Jefferson,Frederick Douglass,Benjamin Franklin and all the people who died defending our freedoms,right morons?"

Comparing Jason Robo to the founding fathers is just about the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

You are an idiot, ArseHooligan.

 
At 16 July, 2010 12:18, Anonymous Marc said...

Let's see...

Moron gets busted vandalizing airport equipment. Secretly hopes he gets abused by police.

Then gets released pending court date on promise that he will behave.

While in airport, stops a flight attendant to grill her about Flight 93. Sees nothing wrong with this, even though people have been arrested since the 1980s for simpley joking about having a bomb in their luggage at the airport.

Is detained after his flight is forced down.

The only thing that bothers me about this story is that this turd-brain was even allowed on that plane to begin with.

This is yet another classic example of the Troofer mind-set. It's not about the truth, it's all about them. Fuck all those other people on that plane that was delayed. Fuck airport security. My message (re: warped ego) is more important. I am smarter than everyone else because I alone see the truth, and because I am the only one who knows the truth I can do whatever I want to to get the story out. I am a victim of the same invisible forces that were behind 9/11.

This guy is mentally ill.

 
At 16 July, 2010 12:46, Anonymous Gibby Haynes said...

I'd be nervous too if a paranoid schizophrenic was on the plane.

 
At 16 July, 2010 12:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Jason Robo--narcissist for 9/11 troof.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:38, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not a peep from you guys about the declassification of 1100 pages from the Vietnam era which shows deep suspicions from congressman and senators about the Gulf of Tonkin false flag attack where 60,000 US servicemen died for no other reason that the Military industrial complex needed to make a buck.

YOUR SILENCE IS DEAFENING

Oh, I'm going off topic, GuitarBill will get his panties in a wad LOL

July 14, 2010
Records Show Doubts on ’64 Vietnam Crisis
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
THE NEW YORK TIMES
WASHINGTON — In an echo of the debates over the discredited intelligence that helped make the case for the war in Iraq, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday released more than 1,100 pages of previously classified Vietnam-era transcripts that show senators of the time sharply questioning whether they had been deceived by the White House and the Pentagon over the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"writes about the advantages that "a new pearl harbor" in speeding up the "process of transformation" would have nine months before they are in office and the NPH just happens to happen on their watch."

The document about defense strategy said, "absent a new Pearl Harbor", you paranoid loon.
One out-of-context statement in a dry boring defense strategy document, and you think it is a secret tip off that the govt planned to kill 3000 of its own citizens? Beyond idiotic.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:48, Anonymous Anonymous said...

President Lyndon B. Johnson cited the attacks to persuade Congress to authorize broad military action in Vietnam, but historians in recent years have concluded that the Aug. 4 attack never happened.
--- New York Times 7/14/10

Textbook example of a False Flag Attack!

Go choke on that one assholes!

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The document about defense strategy said, "absent a new Pearl Harbor", you paranoid loon.
One out-of-context statement

No Sir, it is you who are guilty of taking the statement out of context. Lets look at the complete statement:

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
--- Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, Page 51, A Report of The Project for the New American Century, September 2000.

Since the NPH occured nine months later, they were then able to impliment all their policies.

But that probably just a coincidence. Does not mean anything....right?

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And then they all ran around with their talking points telling us what a great opportunity 9/11 was:

"We've been offered a unique opportunity and we must not let this moment pass."
--- George W. Bush, State Of The Union Address, January 29th, 2002

"a great opportunity"
--- President George W. Bush describing the September 11th attacks, Bob Woodward, Bush at War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002), page 32

"The events of September 11, 2001, opened vast, new opportunities."
--- The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002 (www.whitehouse.gov/nssc), page 28. The principle author of this document was Philip Zelikow whom would go on to be Executive Director of The 9/11 Commission.

[9/11 created] "the kind of opportunities that World War II offered, to refashion the world."
--- Secretary Rumsfeld Interview," New York Times, October 12, 2001

"...how do you capitalize on these opportunities"
---Condoleezza Rice instructing senior members of the National Security Council, Nicholas Lemann, “The Next World Order: The Bush Administration May Have a Brand-New Doctrine of Power,” New Yorker, April 1, 2002

“[T]hrough the tears of sadness I see an opportunity.”
--- President George W. Bush, “September 11, 2001: Attack on America: Remarks by the President in Telephone Conversation with New York Mayor Giuliani and New York Governor Pataki 11:00 A.M. EDT”; September 13, 2001, available at http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/sept_11/president_009.htm; also “Bush Vows to ‘Whip Terrorism,’” Reuters, Sept. 14, 2001.

“if the collapse of the Soviet Union and 9/11 bookend a major shift in international politics, then this is a period not just of grave danger, but of enormous opportunity.”
---Condoleezza Rice, “Remarks by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice on Terrorism and Foreign Policy,” April 29, 2002 (www.whitehouse.gov).

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath whines, "...Oh, I'm going off topic, GuitarBill will get his panties in a wad LOL"

Listening to you and your idiotic, uninformed rants is like having to listen to a eunuch discuss the Kama Sutra.

Persist with half truths innuendos and outright lies to your heart's content, psychopath. I am tired, moreover, of pointing out to you what you find so difficult to comprehend, that most everyone else sees upfront. I apologize for insisting in my foolhardy attempts to teach the pig to sing.

From now on, all you'll get from me is ridicule.

You made your bed, scumbag; now you lay in it.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

But that probably just a coincidence.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see your lips moving but you are not saying anything....Putz!

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am tired, moreover, of pointing out to you what you find so difficult to comprehend


What might that be now? That the guy in the cave did it? That buildings can fall at freefall through themselves if the only energy available is gravity (even Syam Saunder said that was impossible before they admitted that that is wat occurred)......that the Gulf of tonkin was not a bald face lie?

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You are doing a disservice to your idiotic troof by your pedantic self serving ringing endorsement of fallacy.

Tell us, is your worthless life dedicated to spreading ignorance?

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One out-of-context statement in a dry boring defense strategy document

Actually, it is anything but. Explain to me why then the following two statements are essentially identical:

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
--- Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, Page 51, A Report of The Project for the New American Century, September 2000.

“There appears to be general agreement concerning the need to transform the U.S. military into a significantly different kind of force from that which emerged victorious from the Cold and Gulf Wars. Yet this verbal support has not been translated into a defense program supporting transformation ... the 'critical mass' needed to effect it has not yet been achieved. One may conclude that, in the absence of a strong external shock to the United States-a latter-day 'Pearl Harbor' of sorts-surmounting the barriers to transformation will likely prove a long, arduous process.”
--- Andrew Krepinevich, Executive Director of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, testifying before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, March 3, 1999

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The similarities between those two statements is probably just a coincidence

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Krepinevich fails to mention whom the "general agreement" involved.

But that is probably just a coincidence.

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tell us, is your worthless life dedicated to spreading ignorance?

Seems to me GuitarNutCase that you spend a considerably more amount of time on this web site propping up a God damn lie.

There were assholes like you forty years ago claiming that the August 4, 1964 attack in the Gulf of Tonkin actuallty really did happen.


Of course those defenders of that lie then have the blood of 60,000 dead US servicemen on them.

How 'bout you GuitarBill? How much blood is all over you, Mr. defender of the Military Industrial Complex?

Did you not learn anything for Ike's speech in 1960?

He was a fuckin' Republican you know. Figure you might at least listen to him.

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:27, Anonymous Pat the Paunchy Pussy said...

"Tell us, is your worthless life dedicated to spreading ignorance?"
-guiturdBile

You mean like the 'fly ash and torches' trope, dickwad? Why do you trumpet your ignorance of the RJ Lee report yet again, imbecile? Is it because it mentions fly ash, and then gives a totally different reason for the thousands of tons of melted iron in the dust (high temperatures, of course)? Fucking lightweight... do some research, get the facts, and stop making a fool of yourself.

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Listening to you and your idiotic, uninformed rants is like having to listen to a eunuch discuss the Kama Sutra. Persist with half truths innuendos and outright lies to your heart's content, psychopath. I am tired, moreover, of pointing out to you what you find so difficult to comprehend, that most everyone else sees upfront. I apologize for insisting in my foolhardy attempts to teach the pig to sing. From now on, all you'll get from me is ridicule.
You made your bed, scumbag; now you lay in it.



Is this supposed to be a rebuttle ? ?? ????

Who am I debating? A third grader?

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:32, Anonymous Pat's Bestiality Demo said...

Pat: When a quivering mass like GuiturdBalls cites an unfounded source like fly ash for the origin of the thousands of tons of melted iron in the WTC dust, why don't you correct them with sourced info? Better yet, why don't you support your own explanation (cutting torches only)? Do you care about the facts, or only about speculation which supports your world view? And what's it like to be fat, old, and hideous?

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:33, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'll be back. Got better things to do besides debate GuitarBill.






(What an asshole)

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:00, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

PNAC!!!!! PNAC!!!!!!!


RUN FOR DA HILLSSSS!!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!

What a fucking moron.

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:03, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
I'll be back. Got better things to do besides debate GuitarBill."

"Gotta refill my Viagra prescription, restock my K-Y Jelly collection and update my bestiality porn collection.

Then.....HAOWEEEE BABY!!!!, THE KEYBOARD IS GONNA BE STICKY TONITE!!!!!!!!!"

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:08, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Is this supposed to be a rebuttle ? ?? ????"

No.

No, it's not.

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:30, Blogger Triterope said...

Anonymous said...

tl;dr

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LL wrote, "...Then.....HAOWEEEE BABY!!!!, THE KEYBOARD IS GONNA BE STICKY TONITE!!!!!!!!!"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Good one, LL! You ripped the psychopath a new one with that comment.

%^)

 
At 16 July, 2010 17:48, Blogger Triterope said...

HAOWEEEE BABY!!!!, THE KEYBOARD IS GONNA BE STICKY TONITE!!!!!!!!!"

Well, it would explain his perpetual lack of spacing.

 
At 16 July, 2010 18:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

President Lyndon B. Johnson cited the attacks to persuade Congress to authorize broad military action in Vietnam, but historians in recent years have concluded that the Aug. 4 attack never happened.
--- New York Times 7/14/10

Meanwhile all you childish morons might want to try explain away this one.

 
At 16 July, 2010 18:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Meanwhile all you childish morons might want to try explain away this one."

Answer: Quote mining.

Why no link back to the original document, psychopath?

Are you hiding something?

 
At 16 July, 2010 18:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why no link back to the original document, psychopath?



If you were really interested in a serious and honest debate you could have taken that quote and plugged it into google.

Ever hear of google shit for brains?

I think even you GuitarSchmuckHead could have found it if you wanted to.

July 14, 2010
Records Show Doubts on ’64 Vietnam Crisis
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/world/asia/15vietnam.html?_r=1

 
At 16 July, 2010 18:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why no link back to the original document, psychopath?



If you were really interested in a serious and honest debate you could have taken that quote and plugged it into google.

Ever hear of google shit for brains?

I think even you GuitarSchmuckHead could have found it if you wanted to.

July 14, 2010
Records Show Doubts on ’64 Vietnam Crisis
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/world/asia/15vietnam.html?_r=1

 
At 16 July, 2010 18:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I know how to use Google, psychopath.

In fact, I've forgotten more about Google than you'll ever know.

Why should I do your work for you?

Face it, you're a thoroughly dishonest piece of shit--a typical psychopath.

I hear your mommy calling you to dinner, schmuck.

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 18:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Doubts"?

Since when are doubts equivalent to facts?

Trying to elevate speculation to the realm of fact again, psychopath?

Don't you have a little boy to molest?

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Robert J. Hanyok, a retired National Security Agency historian, said Wednesday in an interview that “there were doubts, but nobody wanted to follow up on the doubts,” perhaps because “they felt they’d gone too far down the road.”

Mr. Hanyok concluded in 2001 that N.S.A. officers had deliberately falsified intercepted communications in the incident to make it look like the attack on Aug. 4, 1964, had occurred, although he said they acted not out of political motives but to cover up earlier errors.

Many historians say that President Johnson might have found reason to escalate military action against North Vietnam even without the Tonkin Gulf crisis, and that he apparently had his own doubts. Historians note that a few days after the supposed attack he told George W. Ball, the under secretary of state, “Hell, those dumb, stupid sailors were just shooting at flying fish!”

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ever hear of google shit for brains?"

Let's test your knowledge of Google, shall we psychopath?

This is an elementary-level database application question, by the way.

Google is database driven application.

What's the name of the SQL command employed by Google's middleware application programmers to parse the database?

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What part of the word "deliberately" do you not understand?

60,000 US servicemen paid the price for that "deliberately".

Meanwhile all the people who build the ships, the bombs, the bullets, the missiles and the plains were quite happy with that "deliberatley", as the made a shitload on money...................just like whats happening today with your phony baloney war on terra.

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The New York Times wrote, "...although he said they acted not out of political motives but to cover up earlier errors."

Keep reading that sentence until you get it through your thick skull, psychopath.

You're too stupid and dishonest for words, aren't you, schmuck.

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's the name of the SQL command employed by Google's middleware application programmers to parse the database?

How is that even relavent to the conversation?

If you know so much about google, you could have sourced that quote in two seconds. Instead you found the need to throw it in my face that I did not give you a link.

What is your real agenda here BillyBoy?

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep reading that sentence until you get it through your thick skull, psychopath.

You may accept that, I do not.

Do you not expect the US mainstream media to not spin something like this assuming they report it at all? Idiot!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...How is that even relavent [SIC] to the conversation?"

I don't know spelling bee champ. Could it have something to do with the following sentence?

"...Ever hear of google shit for brains?"

And you didn't answer my question, psychopath.

Another epic failure for the psychopath.

So what were you saying about your alleged knowledge of Google, shit-for-brains?

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:18, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And even if we accept that they DELIBERATELY "acted not out of political motives"................then neither two administrations (republican and democrat), the senate, the house, the pentagon.............no one questioned anything till 60,000 boys were dead?

Is that what you are defending William?

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...You may accept that, I do not...Do you not expect the US mainstream media to not spin something like this assuming they report it at all? Idiot!"

Who gives a shit what you accept or don't accept.

The fact remains that you're misrepresenting your source again, psychopath.

BUSTED TELLING LIES AGAIN, PSYCHOPATH!

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So, when will you answer the database question, Mr, "Google expert"?

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And then after the north overran the south in 1975 and Siagon fell...........guess what............the world did not come to an end. The dominos did not fall one by one. The United States is still here.

But 60,000 boys are dead....William!


...and the Military Industrial Complex made a shitload of MONEY

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:25, Blogger GuitarBill said...

When will you apologize for misrepresenting your source, psychopath?

FACE IT, PSYCHOPATH, I CAUGHT YOU RED HANDED!

Tell us, psychopath, is your worthless life dedicated to spreading ignorance and lies?

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The fact remains that you're misrepresenting your source again,

How can I misrepresent my source if I deliberatly did not edit out the OPINION of the reporter that it was not for political motives. I did not hide that. Then you would have accused me of cherry picking now.

And who cares what you think?

Who are you?

The only people who respect you are the five other losers who waste their lives on this site twenty hours a day.

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You didn't divulge that paragraph until I called you on it--and you didn't source your quote until I demanded the source.

Once I had the source, it was easy to discover that you were misrepresenting your source, psychopath.

FACE IT, PSYCHOPATH, I CAUGHT YOU RED HANDED!

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying psychopath!

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The bottom line, a US president used an attack that never happened to railroad congress into authorizing a war that 60,000 US servicemen lost their lives.

What about the 60,000 US servicemen William? You don't give a rats ass about them now do you?

President Lyndon B. Johnson cited the attacks to persuade Congress to authorize broad military action in Vietnam, but historians in recent years have concluded that the Aug. 4 attack never happened.
--- New York Times 7/14/10

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

YOUR BALL'S ARE IN THE VICE AGAIN, PSYCHOPATH!

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying psychopath!

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The bottom line is that I caught you misrepresenting your source again, psychopath.

ROTFLMAO!

YOUR BALL'S ARE IN THE VICE AGAIN, PSYCHOPATH!

Squirm, "Brian", squirm weasel--you lying psychopath!

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Who are you?"

I'm your daddy, motherfucker, and I OWN you!

ROTFLMAO!

YOUR BALL'S ARE IN THE VICE AGAIN, PSYCHOPATH!


Squirm, "Brian", squirm weasel--you lying psychopath!

Andele, pendejo!

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

GuitarBill puts his 38 caliber sterling silver debunker revolvers back in his holster, tips his jaunty Stetson hat to the ladies, and rides off into the sunset.

Another day; another 9/11 troofer shot full of holes.

Shot down in flames!

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:30, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Meanwhile all you childish morons might want to try explain away this one."


LBJ was a Democrat.

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:32, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"If you were really interested in a serious and honest debate you could have taken that quote and plugged it into google."

Adn if you were really interested in a serious and honest debate you could have taken that quote and shoved it up your ass.

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:34, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Meanwhile all the people who build the ships, the bombs, the bullets, the missiles and the plains were quite happy with that "deliberatley", as the made a shitload on money"

Oooooo.....


MUNITIONS MAKERS!!!!!!!!

I hadn't heard that one since.....1928.

I bet you think they're all JOOOOs too.

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:37, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
And then after the north overran the south in 1975 and Siagon fell...........guess what............the world did not come to an end. The dominos did not fall one by one."

Well, let's see.

Hundreds of thousands of South Vietnamese tortured and murdered and thrown into concentratiuon camps.

A MILLION Laotions dead.

You sure don't know any history, do you shit for brains?

 
At 16 July, 2010 21:00, Anonymous Marc said...

Okay, just so I'm understanding Analpuss's latest neural mis-fire; because we have said nothing about the Gulf of Tonkin we are stupid.

This is a blog about the dip-shits who think that 9/11 was some kind of conspiracy jobby-job. Not about something that happened almost 50 years ago in South East Asia. There are hundreds of quality Vietnam War history websites that stay current with that war, just as the Civil War has websites and so on.

It's not that we don't care, many of us have family members who fought in Vietnam, and a few of us actually went to Vietnam. The issue is that Vietnam has nothing to do with 9/11, even as some tin-foil hat example of a false-flag operation.

It fails because the Gulf og Tonkin incident happened of the coast of Vietnam, not in Manhattan. The attacks were (allegedly) made by North Vietnamese gunboats of the North Vietnamese navy. The attacks of 9/11 were carried out by Saudis and Egyptians, yet we invaded Afghanistan. Later we invade Iraq in response to their non-compliance with UN mandates. So I'm not sure that Troofer understanf a false-flag operation at all. First off, why not load the planes up with Iraq hijackers? The CIA could have used their super-duper secret mind-control expertise on Iraq refugees. Then once we invade Iraq to secure WMDs that Bush?Cheney/Hilter supposedly knew were not there, why not plant them in Iraq for our troops to "find"? If you can fly three passenger jets into buildings, crash on in a field, and get away with it then landing on a remote Iraqi highway with a C-130 loaded with canisters of VX gas would have been a breeze.

Your logic fails. This failure is painful to watch. No, in truth I could give a shit about the Gulf of Tonkin incident because it is ancient history. Also because it has nothing to do with 9/11. Neither does Justin Bieber,the final Episode of LOST, nor vacation rentals in Fiji. We don't talk about any of those things because we are here to have a good laugh at the latest sadsack moron who thinks he knows the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. If we wanted to talk about that stuff we would go to the appropriate website and discuss those topics there.

Duh.

 
At 16 July, 2010 22:04, Anonymous New Yorker said...

If you can fly three passenger jets into buildings, crash on in a field, and get away with it then landing on a remote Iraqi highway with a C-130 loaded with canisters of VX gas would have been a breeze.

This was where my bullshit detector first went off many years ago when I first became aware of the "truth" movement (and before I discovered this site). The "truth" movement wants us to believe the most convoluted and dangerous conspiracy the world has ever known was pulled off without a hitch or without anyone ever coming clean....and yet the mad genius who pulled it off (Bush or Cheney) forgot to plant a few canisters of Sarin in the empty desert in southern Iraq.

Yeah, sure.....

 
At 17 July, 2010 04:42, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

This is a blog about the dip-shits who think that 9/11 was some kind of conspiracy jobby-job.

To be fair, the official story is a conspiracy. But I know what you mean. The basic cognitive flaw with Troofers is that they're poor judges of relevance. They don't know when to stop connecting dots.

Today's word is apophenia.

 
At 17 July, 2010 08:21, Blogger avicenne said...

"Your logic fails. This failure is painful to watch."

It's staggering. It's like watching a fucking perpetual car crash, because the perverse consistency of the 'truthers' is such that everything they say or do is ridiculous.

The bubble this guy Robo exists in prevents him from realising that polemics about secret government conspiracies and aviation disasters are inappropriate when you're on a plane.

Has he learnt anything from his experiences? It appears not. "Some people ask me if I would do it all again? Certainly, but my strategy would probably be modified."

 
At 17 July, 2010 09:46, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

"To be fair, the official story is a conspiracy."

Bullshit. Words have different meanings in different contexts. For instance, look up the word "pull" in the dictionary.

"Conspiracy" is a technical legal term in common law jurisdictions.

"Conspiracy theory" is now necessarily a pejorative. Wikipedia provides a good description.

These bozos think that some ground has been conceded to them if the "official story" is seen as a "conspiracy." Bullshit. Don't encourage them.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

PfC, since the FBI admits they lack sufficient evidence to indict bin Laden, the government's hijacker theory would appear to be a conspiracy theory.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:25, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still in denial, shit stain?

So tell us, psychopath, when will you apologize to us for lying?

Coward.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:48, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

"Conspiracy" is a technical legal term in common law jurisdictions. ... These bozos think that some ground has been conceded to them if the "official story" is seen as a "conspiracy."

The official story is a conspiracy in the legal sense. Nothing wrong with saying so. "Conspiracy theory" indeed means something else. I tried to politely highlight the difference between what the poster said and what he probably meant to say, because inventing new meanings for words is something Truthers do.

And really, these bozos pathologically believe all kinds of false shit anyway. What they think on this issue is certainly not important enough to start redefining words.

 
At 17 July, 2010 12:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"since the FBI admits they lack sufficient evidence to indict bin Laden"
Philosphers, take note!
Mankind finally has a true working example of the vague concept of "eternity":

Troofer lies are eternal, they never end (hopefully soon, though, troofers themselves can tell their lies in hell for eternity).

 
At 17 July, 2010 12:14, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

Everyone is free to choose what to be frightened of or what to consider an inconvenience. Yet it must be noted that Robo never committed anything even resembling a crime, nor was there any probably cause to believe otherwise at any point in time. Hence his arrest and attempts on the part of the prosecution to build a case against him were contrived at best.

 
At 17 July, 2010 12:38, Anonymous Marc said...

Technically 9/11 was a conspircay.

Al Qaeda operatives, along with a variety of financiers planned and executed the attacks. We have caught most of the planners, some still elude us.

It is just not the conspircay that the Troofers want.

 
At 17 July, 2010 12:46, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who would be dumb enough to think that NORAD would let unarmed airliners bumble around the sky for 100 minutes and even fly into the Pentagon?

The plot was completely impractical, and the FBI had known about it ever since the capture in 1995 of Abdul Hakim Murad. NORAD even did drills on the concept of hijacked airliners as flying bombs.

Even if there was a plot by Muslims to hijack airliners, what remains to be exposed is why it succeeded, and why the gov't investigations go to such great lengths to cover up the facts.

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:06, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
PfC, since the FBI admits they lack sufficient evidence to indict bin Laden"

That statement is a lie.

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:11, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Yet it must be noted that Robo never committed anything even resembling a crime,"

Don't have to. Being a bugfuck crazy conspiracy theorist is enough to get you the hairy eyeball in transportation hubs across the world.

"... nor was there any probably cause to believe otherwise at any point in time."

Google "bugfuck crazy" and see if that's probable cause. 'Cause it is.

"Hence his arrest and attempts on the part of the prosecution to build a case against him were contrived at best."

Contrived and perpetuated and attempted by HIM, you retarded marmoset.

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:18, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Who would be dumb enough to think that NORAD would let unarmed airliners bumble around the sky for 100 minutes and even fly into the Pentagon?"

You would. 'Cause you're a moron.

"The plot was completely impractical"


Except that it worked. Which proves that your assesment is moronic.

".... and the FBI had known about it ever since the capture in 1995 of Abdul Hakim Murad."

And you know this.....how, moron?



" NORAD even did drills on the concept of hijacked airliners as flying bombs."

I'm sure NORAD has drills in case of attacks by aggresive Canadian geeese against Detroit, you fucking idiot moron.

"Even if there was a plot by Muslims to hijack airliners"

There is no "if" you moron, it happened. and all the semantic tapdancing in the world won't change reality. A concept, I'm sure, that you have only a passing aquaintence with, you moron.

"...what remains to be exposed is why it succeeded..."

Nineteen arabs hijacked 4 airliners and succeeded in flying three of them into buildings in New York And Washington, DC. There's nothing to "expose, you moron.

"...and why the gov't investigations go to such great lengths to cover up the facts."

There is no "cover up" you fucking retarded intestinal polyp.

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:19, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh really, LL. So when did the FBI indict Osama? I see to have missed that little tidbit.

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The impractical plot worked only because there was in effect no air defense for 100 minutes. How did al Qaeda know there was going to be no air defense?

Abdul Hakim Murad, and his knowledge of Project Bojinka, was turned over to US authorities in 1995.

Can you prove your claim that NORAD did drills against geese?

There is certainly something to expose, and that's why there was no air defense. The 9/11 Commission found it necessary to ignore NORAD's shifting accounts and invent a timeline to explain it. That's a coverup. There were 115 critical omissions and distortions in the report. The hijackers' source of funding, for one thing.

 
At 17 July, 2010 14:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...The impractical plot worked only because there was in effect no air defense for 100 minutes. How did al Qaeda know there was going to be no air defense?"

Al Qeada had no idea how NORAD would react.

And aren't you conveniently forgetting that the hijackers TURNED THE AIRLINERS' TRANSPONDERS OFF. That makes tracking down the airliners virtually impossible.

Let's look at the Payne Stewart episode.

"...Flight 11 would have been intercepted by fighter jets within 10 minutes of any sign that it may have been hijacked." -- David Ray Grifter, lying his @$$ off in "The New Pearl Harbor".


Payne Stewart’s Learjet 35, registration N47BA, flew across several states before crashing on October 25, 1999. According to the NTSB communication with the aircraft was lost at 9:33 EDT. A test pilot from the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, reached the Learjet at 9:54 CDT--a full 81 minutes after initial communication was lost.

The psychopath dissembles, "...there was in effect no air defense for 100 minutes."

Bullshit!

[1] Flight A11 was hijacked at 8:13 EDT and crashed at 8:46 EDT, which is a duration of 33 minutes.

[2] Flight UA175 was hijacked at 8:47 EDT and crashed at 9:03 EDT, which is a duration of 16 minutes.

[3] Flight AA77 was hijacked at 8:56 EDT and crashed at 9:37 EDT, which is a duration of 41 minutes.

[4] Flight UA 93 was hijacked at 9:28 EDT and crashed at 10:03 EDT, which is a duration of 35 minutes.

The fact is that the intercept of Stewart’s Learjet took twice as long as the longest hijack duration on 911.

LL is right, you're bugfuck crazy.

 
At 17 July, 2010 14:32, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Oh really, LL. So when did the FBI indict Osama?"

Just to show what a heaping bowl of Fail, drowned in Weak sauce you truly are:

The FBI

Does.

Not.

Indict.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

What a fucktard!

What a marooon!!!!!

 
At 17 July, 2010 14:44, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
The impractical plot worked only because there was in effect no air defense for 100 minutes. How did al Qaeda know there was going to be no air defense?"

They counted on the ususl response to the usual hijacking scenerio.

Are you truly too fucking stoooooopid to understand that?

Oh....

And it's interesting that you're admitting that there was a plot by al Queda. Give up on the BOOOOOOSH AND TEH JOOOOOOS DID IT nuttiness, brian?

"Abdul Hakim Murad, and his knowledge of Project Bojinka, was turned over to US authorities in 1995."

And that has what to do with what?

"Can you prove your claim that NORAD did drills against geese?"

Can you prove you're not an elbow licking retard? 'Cause that question realllly pushes the possible answers to "no".

"There is certainly something to expose"

Don't do it, brian.

You'll get arrested.

Again.

"...and that's why there was no air defense."

Now you're THE WORLD'S GREATEST EXPERT on air defense.

So, retard, what exactly was your MOS?

"There were 115 critical omissions and distortions in the report."

What were they? List them, fucktard.

I dare you.

I double dog dare you.

Yeah, I thought not.

"The hijackers' source of funding, for one thing."

[mouth opens in astonishment]

Really?

"The hijackers' source of funding, for one thing."

You think that that is unknown and unexplained......

REALLY?

I think GB is right.

Plankton can outsmart you seven ways to Sunday.

Great Cthulu on a a bun, you are one stupid motherfucker.

 
At 17 July, 2010 15:44, Blogger Triterope said...

Yet it must be noted that Robo never committed anything even resembling a crime

So making a disturbance on a flight isn't a crime now? Boris, that's stupid even by your standards.

 
At 17 July, 2010 17:16, Blogger ConsDemo said...

Hence his arrest and attempts on the part of the prosecution to build a case against him were contrived at best.

Quite the opposite, Bore-ass. His actions could have been considered a crime but the authorities didn't think it was worth trying to build a case against him. To suggest it was "contrived" appeals to the usual twoofer mindset "they are out to get us because we are so important" when in fact the opposite is true, you dickheads are so unimportant they don't bother with you.

 
At 17 July, 2010 19:17, Blogger 天花天花 said...

及時行樂-快樂不需要理由............................................................

 
At 17 July, 2010 22:01, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...
PfC, since the FBI admits they lack sufficient evidence to indict bin Laden"

That statement is a lie.




FACT: OBL has never been indicted for 9/11 by the US government..........why not?

FACT: The case against OBL as presented by Tony Blair on 10/4/01begins with the following statement: “This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law.”

 
At 17 July, 2010 22:10, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They counted on the usual response to the usual hijacking scenerio.
Are you truly too fucking stoooooopid to understand that





Oh, is that the "usual hijacking scenerio" that the fucking pentagon did a MASCAL drill in the fucking sandbox with a crashed toy plane in the center courtyard of the toy model of the pentagon in 2000.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_MASCAL

Lazarus Long, if you were any stupider you would have an IQ equivalent to bread mold.

 
At 17 July, 2010 22:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

[1] Flight A11 was hijacked at 8:13 EDT and crashed at 8:46 EDT, which is a duration of 33 minutes.

[2] Flight UA175 was hijacked at 8:47 EDT and crashed at 9:03 EDT, which is a duration of 16 minutes.

[3] Flight AA77 was hijacked at 8:56 EDT and crashed at 9:37 EDT, which is a duration of 41 minutes.

[4] Flight UA 93 was hijacked at 9:28 EDT and crashed at 10:03 EDT, which is a duration of 35 minutes.





How do you explain that after the second tower was hit at 9:03, nobody in the pentagon thought to put CAP (combat air patrol) over Washington DC for the next 34 minutes? There was not one fighter jet in Andrews AFB???

And you believe that now?

 
At 17 July, 2010 23:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...How do you explain that after the second tower was hit at 9:03, nobody in the pentagon thought to put CAP (combat air patrol) over Washington DC for the next 34 minutes? There was not one fighter jet in Andrews AFB???"

Again jackass, NORAD and CAP don't operate out of Andrews Air Force Base. Do you honestly believe that asking the same idiotic questions over-and-over again lends some force of credibility to your argument?

Keep reading the following paragraph over-and-over again until you get it through your thick skull, psychopath.

"...And aren't you conveniently forgetting that the hijackers TURNED THE AIRLINERS' TRANSPONDERS OFF. That makes tracking down the airliners virtually impossible."

Keep working on it idiot, and maybe in a generation or two you'll get it.

Until then, don't you have an adolescent boy to molest?

 
At 18 July, 2010 02:45, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"FACT: OBL has never been indicted for 9/11 by the US government..........why not?"

Here, I'll type this real slow so you can understand:

The

FBI

Does

Not

Indict

People.

You ignorant paramecium.

"FACT: The case against OBL as presented by Tony Blair on 10/4/01begins"

And this has what to do with what, you ignorant paramecium?

"Oh, is that the "usual hijacking scenerio" that the fucking pentagon did a MASCAL drill in the fucking sandbox with a crashed toy plane in the center courtyard of the toy model of the pentagon in 2000."

Can someone translate this gibberish into English? I don't speak Parameciumese.

"Lazarus Long, if you were any stupider you would have an IQ equivalent to bread mold."

Even if that were true, which it is not, I could still outsmart you, you retarded marmoset.

As it is, I'm about a million times smarter and better informed than you, you ignorant paramecium.

 
At 18 July, 2010 04:20, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Yet it must be noted that Robo never committed anything even resembling a crime, nor was there any probably cause to believe otherwise at any point in time.

He was arrested on disorderly conduct. Disorderly conduct is a crime in Massachusetts. Would your opinion be the same if the stickers read "Kill All Jews?"

 
At 18 July, 2010 08:26, Blogger angrysoba said...

He was arrested on disorderly conduct. Disorderly conduct is a crime in Massachusetts. Would your opinion be the same if the stickers read "Kill All Jews?"

When it comes to Truthers, all bets are off.

 
At 18 July, 2010 15:39, Blogger Bill said...

what an idiot. the MCA has no jurisdiction over US citizens.

"A military commission under this chapter shall have jurisdiction to try any offense made punishable by this
chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful
enemy combatant before, on, or after September 11, 2001."

 
At 19 July, 2010 14:51, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

Has there ever been a cult that has been so crushed,so humiliated and so decisively exposed as the Debunker Cult has at this moronic,fascistic thread by one l'il ol' "Anonymous"? Of course not.Just get a load of the insane and apoplectic responses to the easy analogy and obvious similarities between the Tonkin Gulf fraud and the 9/11 false flag events and you see that this degraded cult is the Wackiest Ship on the Internet!!Can someone inform the astoundingly idiotic "Git" that Payne Stewart's Lear jet wasn't hijacked and wasn't aiming at major metropolitan areas after being hijacked.He apparently can't process that shit.Obviously,the nutty fuck had his head handed to him once too often by some actual tough guys down in Texas."Quote mining" is all the jerkoff can spit out because he's way too much of a pussy to acknowledge defeat!And then there's Pornboy,relegated to calling people "paramecium" and the like.Oof!

 
At 19 July, 2010 16:37, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie V. said...
Has there ever been a cult that has been so crushed,so humiliated and so decisively exposed as the Debunker Cult has at this moronic,fascistic thread by one l'il ol' "Anonymous"?"

How will an associate bolt across a continuous directive? It remains a mystery why, in other words, our faculties are a representation of the things in themselves. Because of the relationship between the Architectonic of pure reason and the objects in space and time, in particular, would thereby be made to contradict our understanding. As is proven in the ontological manuals, there can be no doubt.
Does the highest science slave in the galaxy?

 
At 19 July, 2010 17:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Delusional, aren't you ArseHooligan?

After all, you constantly claim victory, but you have no victories to show for your efforts.

Go away ArseHooligan. You're not a conspiracy theorist; you're an embarrassment to the 9/11 troof movement (if that's possible, given their track record); a one-note blowhard who's never presented a shred of evidence to substantiate the troof movements' batshit crazy ideas.

Again, go play in the freeway, ArseHooligan.

 
At 19 July, 2010 18:04, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has there ever been a cult that has been so crushed,so humiliated and so decisively exposed as the Debunker Cult

How cute D'oh P. still can't hide his tells!
Howz Manchester, fucktard?

DogTown

 
At 19 July, 2010 18:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry to the above, that was a good channeling of D'oh. Didn't bother to read rest.

 
At 20 July, 2010 08:23, Anonymous Arhoolie "Soltary" Vanunu said...

Hey "Git",say what?

 
At 20 July, 2010 08:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ArseHooligan, you can't play a Hammond organ. After all, musicians understand music theory.

So, when will you answer my question?

Question: C mixolydian mode represents which major scale?

And remember, ArseHooligan, all modes are scales, but not all scales are modes.

NOW ANSWER THE QUESTION--YOU LYING KNOB.

 
At 20 July, 2010 17:11, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu (not really on B-3!!) said...

We warned the "Git" about the brown acid,but he pitched headlong into the batch and look what happened!!!!! talk about changing the subject! The Wacky Yuppie is right out of the pages of The Onion,ain't he!?!

 
At 20 July, 2010 17:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...not really on B-3!!"

So, you admit that you're a Hammond organ molester!

You're a shameless degenerate, ArseHooligan.

I certainly hope the FBI brings you to justice before you strike again.

 
At 21 July, 2010 08:30, Anonymous Arhoolie the "Git" Crusher said...

Link us some of your output,Dogboy,and I don't mean your blizzard of reactionary bullshit.I mean your Muzak.

 
At 21 July, 2010 16:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, ArseHooligan, when your back's against the wall, change the subject.

 
At 22 July, 2010 14:52, Blogger Triterope said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 26 July, 2010 15:42, Anonymous Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...

"And Then There None".No sane commenters from the Debunker Cult,that is!! It's been fun shellacking you yentas up and down the field.And on your own home pitch!! I'll be back to clobber you again.Promise,Tritedick.

 
At 26 July, 2010 15:44, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Whoops,before the screeching Nutty Professor is in his cups,it's:"And Then There Were None".

 
At 26 July, 2010 15:59, Blogger Triterope said...

I'll be back to clobber you again.Promise,Tritedick.

You say that in a thread where I barely talked to you, 9 days after my last post? Christ, you can't even troll right.

 
At 27 July, 2010 10:29, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

What in hell are you going on about,Tritedoggie? Jeepers,guy,at least come back with something,anything!

 
At 28 July, 2010 17:32, Blogger Triterope said...

As I was saying...

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:20, Anonymous Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...

When you want to render the Debunker Cult as the imbeciles they are,all you have to do is say "Tonkin Gulf" to them and watch as they become slack-jawed,mute and sporting a thousand yard stare! We've found your soft spot,Boyos and it's all over but the shouting,at this point.The pasting y'all are taking is not a pretty sight!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home