Thursday, July 15, 2010

Truther Music Videos

This is almost as bad as that Judy Wood song.

169 Comments:

At 15 July, 2010 08:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Where's the bridge? Has anyone seen the confounded bridge?

%^)

 
At 15 July, 2010 08:37, Anonymous troyfromwv said...

If any "debunker" were to write a parody song making fun of the kooks (weird al style), I'd record it with my wonderful singing voice and YouTube it.

 
At 15 July, 2010 09:35, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

It's silly bad,but not half as bad as the pathetic "music" that delusional chappies like Sackdoily think is oh,so hip.Like the Stranglers and the Sex Pistols and all that drain-pipe trousers garbage.A bunch of lager louts screeching and banging their wrists up against a guitar,complaining about their meager dole checks was the death knell for popular music and shitheads like Sacky proclaiming that such slop was the second coming of Howlin' Wolf or something is the height of pretentious absurdities.Sackdoily,it's time to burn your shabby EP collection and climb out of the pub! "Git",why don't you just shut your festering gob.

 
At 15 July, 2010 09:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...'Git',why don't you just shut your festering gob."

What's the matter, ArseHooligan, are you starting to lose it?

After all, it appears that you're reduced to lifting one-liners from Monty Python.

And if you must resort to such stupidity, have the decency to get your quotes straight.

"...Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type make me puke, you vacuous, toffee-nosed, malodorous pervert!"

Whatever you do, ArseHooligan, STOP MOLESTING INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS HAMMOND ORGANS. After all, it's crime--you twit.

 
At 15 July, 2010 10:32, Anonymous TV said...

Hm. What is this "music" you speak of? I do hear some variations in pitch and volume of the emitted sounds, but not the kind we normally associate with music.
It's also as much video as Mona Lisa is one.

When was the last time the twoof movement was able to come up with something resembling a good propaganda action? 4 years now?

 
At 15 July, 2010 10:40, Blogger James B. said...

The bridge must have been demolished with supersekritmagiconanothermite.

 
At 15 July, 2010 11:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not a bad song, not bad for a demo, though the vocals are poor and mixed too hot so as to make the words intelligible.

What I find more intriguing is this related video: a C-64 based "Keytar": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LZUH0p6cXc&feature=related

 
At 15 July, 2010 11:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath belches, "...What I find more intriguing is this related video: a C-64 based 'Keytar'"

Which proves that your taste is in your mouth.

Now, shut your mouth or I will slap the taste out of you.

 
At 15 July, 2010 11:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gee, do you talk to your kids like that? So let me guess, did Dr. Harris let you down?

 
At 15 July, 2010 11:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

T-minus 15 minutes and counting until Dr. Harris returns from lunch.

Prepare to eat crow--you son-of-a-bitch.

 
At 15 July, 2010 12:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, it appears that you threatened violence against Brian Good. Wouldn't it be a hoot if you attacked him, and tried to explain it all started when you took exception to what some anonymous guy on the internet said? I bet they'd put you on a 72-hour hold, poofster!

 
At 15 July, 2010 12:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

T-minus 5 minutes and counting until Dr. Harris returns from lunch.

Crow! Yum, yum.

 
At 15 July, 2010 12:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Th psychopath dissembles, "...GutterBall, it appears that you threatened violence against Brian Good."

No, it appears that you're lying again, scumbag.

Isn't compulsive lying, moreover, standard operating procedure for a psychopath?

And remember, creep, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 15 July, 2010 12:24, Anonymous New Yorker said...

GutterBall, it appears that you threatened violence against Brian Good. Wouldn't it be a hoot if you attacked him, and tried to explain it all started when you took exception to what some anonymous guy on the internet said? I bet they'd put you on a 72-hour hold, poofster!

Seek professional help, Brian.

 
At 15 July, 2010 12:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Update.

I just got off the phone with Dr. Harris, and I can say with 100% confidence that you're wrong, troofer.

First, let me say that Dr. Harris is a kind and patient engineer; his answers are candid, lucid and very informative.

GuitarBill: Is it fair to say that you endorse the NIST Report and its conclusions, including the collapse mechanism?

Dr. Harris: (Paraphrasing) Yes. I endorse the engineering analysis, and I think it's the most probable explanation.

Any questions, troofer?

(Dr. Harris, if you're reading this post, feel free to chime in with anything you'd like to add to the debate.)

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So after GutterBall lied about the 14 engineers on his list by claiming that they had expressed support for the NIST report, after he lied about Dr. Harris, claiming his testimony supported the NIST report, now we're supposed to believe his transcript.

Thanks for demonstrating your crippled epistemology, poofster. Is that all you've got? I can't even report that at 911blogger--do you understand that? I can't cite an anonymous internet poster's hearsay claims.

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And then you don't even quote him directly, you give us your paraphrase!

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Call him if you don't believe me.

(303) 860-9021

Put up, or shut up, psychopath.

In addition, the debunker community will be proud to know that Dr. Harris thanked us for all the work we do to rebut the lies, distortions and insanity of the so-called "9/11 truth movement".

Give Dr. Harris a call, psychopath, because I'm sure he'd enjoy the opportunity to rebut your never ending stream of lies.

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...And then you don't even quote him directly, you give us your paraphrase!"

I didn't record the call--you jackass.

Why?

Because recording a phone conversation is illegal.

Does the obvious always escape you, psychopath?

And remember, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:24, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Oh my, brian good takes a roundhouse kick to the nuts and he cando is whine about "epistemology", a word he doesn't even understand.

Bravo, brian, for being such a patient crash test dummy!

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, there's no reason to bother calling Harris if he doesn't have the guts to make a public statement.

Say, did you ask if if he knows any independent engineers who have publicly endorsed the NIST report? You haven't named any.

You're proving my point.

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...GutterBall, there's no reason to bother calling Harris if he doesn't have the guts to make a public statement."

Cop out.

Another epic failure for the 9/11 troofers.

It would be pathetic if it wasn't so hilarious.

"...Say, did you ask if if he knows any independent engineers who have publicly endorsed the NIST report? You haven't named any."

Why don't you call him, and let him answer your question personally?

Bottom line: You're a lying coward.

Amazing. You're almost 60 years-old and you still haven't grown a pair.

Brian Good--eunuch for 9/11 troof.

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You still can't name a single independent engineer who has endorsed the NIST report.

And if you ever showed up to challenge Gage at any of ten or fifteen times he's spoken in the Bay Area, I never heard about it.

You don't know anything about me, poofster.

 
At 15 July, 2010 13:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Dr. Harris told me that he's an independent structural engineer. In addition, he has NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST with NIST--period.

Don't believe me. Call him, eunuch.

I have nothing to hide.

You, on the other hand...

 
At 15 July, 2010 14:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...You don't know anything about me, poofster [SIC]."

On the contrary, eunuch, I know that you're psychopath and a compulsive liar.

 
At 15 July, 2010 14:33, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you have nothing to hide, provide your real name.

There's no reason to call Dr. Harris. He doesn't have the guts to make a public statement. Why not?

 
At 15 July, 2010 14:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...If you have nothing to hide, provide your real name."

And risk my family's safety? Not on your life, stalker for 9/11 troof. After all, how many innocent people have been murdered by troofers?

"...There's no reason to call Dr. Harris. He doesn't have the guts to make a public statement. Why not?"

More specious nonsense garnished with denial, "Brian"?

Face it, coward, you lost the debate again.

How does "Brian Good" spell "UNIX"?

Answer: Eunuchs.

 
At 15 July, 2010 14:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Come on, "Brian", squirm you pathetic weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:02, Anonymous New Yorker said...

GutterBall, there's no reason to bother calling Harris if he doesn't have the guts to make a public statement.

It's always fun to see how upset Petgoat gets when he knows, even in that diseased mind of his, that he has lost. Such squealing!

Say, did you ask if if he knows any independent engineers who have publicly endorsed the NIST report? You haven't named any.

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

You're proving my point.

You have no point.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:04, Anonymous New Yorker said...

You don't know anything about me, poofster.

Yes we do. Your name is Brian Good, and you have internet names such as Petgoat, punxsutawneybarney, Snug Bug, and Contrivance. You're an unemployed janitor who lives with his parents in Palo Alto, CA. You look like a homeless, insane version of Christopher Lloyd, and you're an unbalanced stalker of both men (Barrett, Rodriguez) and women (Brouillet).

You lose as always, Petgoat.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:05, Anonymous New Yorker said...

If you have nothing to hide, provide your real name.

There's no reason to call Dr. Harris. He doesn't have the guts to make a public statement. Why not?


My, such squealing!

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You still can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report.
You must rely on the concept of implicit endorsements and the hearsay accounts of an anonymous internet poster of demonstrated poor integrity.

And if you ever showed up to challenge Gage at any of ten or fifteen times he's spoken in the Bay Area, I never heard about it.

You don't know anything about me, poofster.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:33, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
You still can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report."

[YAWWWNNNN}

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Squirm, "Brain", squirm--you pathetic weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You still can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report.
You must rely on the concept of implicit endorsements and the hearsay accounts of an anonymous internet poster of demonstrated poor integrity.

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:42, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
You still can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report"

[sssnnnnoooorrrre....snkkk snkk snkkk

sssnnnnoooorrrre....snkkk snkk snkkk

sssnnnnoooorrrre....snkkk snkk snkkk]

 
At 15 July, 2010 15:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those aren't independent engineers.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:03, Blogger Triterope said...

You look like a homeless, insane version of Christopher Lloyd

Heh.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...You still can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report."

Really?

And you still can't acknowledge reality. Then again, troofers are preternaturally delusional, so this comes as no surprise to anyone.

"...You must rely on the concept of implicit endorsements and the hearsay accounts of an anonymous internet poster of demonstrated poor integrity."

Tell us, how does a weasel define "demonstrated"?

Answer: Conforming to "Brian Good's" delusions.

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, you can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report.

You're reduced to the concepts of implicit endorsement and pre-emptive endorsement. Why can't you name even one? Get busy!

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't tell me to squirm, GutterBall. That's your job while you whoop whoop whoop your own ass.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...GutterBall, you can't name a single independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report."

You sound like a broken record.

Squirm, troofer, squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Don't tell me to squirm, GutterBall."

I don't have to do anything, troofer. After all, you squirm all by yourself.

"...That's your job while you whoop whoop whoop your own ass."

Spoken like the delusional fucktard you've always been, "Brian".

Squirm, troofer, squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not squirming, GutterBall. You should be. You still haven't named a single independent engineer who publicly endorses the NIST report. Why can't you do that?

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:46, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
I'm not squirming, GutterBall."

Yes you are. liar.

GB got your teeny tiny little balls in a vice, once again, and all you can do is squirm squirm squirm lie lie lie.

Your are boring, brian, pathetic and boring.

 
At 15 July, 2010 16:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...I'm not squirming, GutterBall."

False.

"...You should be."

Dream on, anus spawn.

"...You still haven't named a single independent engineer who publicly endorses the NIST report. Why can't you do that?"

Just keep bathing in your delusions, psychopath.

So when will you make that phone call, coward?

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You guys are hampered by a cripple epistemology.

You can't name one independent engineer who publicly endorses the NIST report, and you're trying to claim that's a victory.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, weasel, bathe in your delusions.

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...cripple epistemology [SIC]."

Your desperation is palpable--you illiterate weasel.

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about billshitter putting his money where his mouth is and post up some of his great music? I`m sure someone has one of his 'gigs" on video. Since hes a pro and all.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heres where he`ll say hes worried the twoofers will come get him.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:29, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not lying, Bill. You haven't named one independent engineer who publicly endorsed the NIST report. Prove me wrong. Why isn't that easy for you?

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Why not answer my question, Mr. "I Had Music Theory In Junior College"?

What major scale does C mixolydian mode represent?

And when you're finished, Mr. "Cop Out", answer the questions found here.

So, when will you make that phone call--you illiterate weasel?

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 17:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...I'm not lying, Bill."

False.

"...You haven't named one independent engineer who publicly endorsed the NIST report. Prove me wrong. Why isn't that easy for you?"

That's right, weasel, bathe in your delusions.

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 18:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, you have not named even one independent engineer who will publicly endorse the NIST report, and you're not man enough to admit that you can't.

 
At 15 July, 2010 18:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I've already answered your question.

Source: asce.org: Testimony of Dr. James Harris, Ph.D, P.E.

Source: asce.org: Statement of the ASCE on fiscal year 2005 Appropriations for the NIST.

And I have Dr. Harris' confirmation that the aforementioned documents constitute a public endorsement of the NIST Report.

You don't believe me? Call him, weasel. After all, I gave you his number.

So when will stop the STONEWALLING and answer my questions, weasel?

Go for it, Mr. "I Had Music Theory In Junior College."

What major scale does C mixolydian mode represent?

And when you're finished, Mr. "Cop Out", answer the questions found here.

So, when will you make that phone call--you illiterate weasel?

Or do you honestly believe that constant STONEWALLING convinces anyone of anything other than your breathtaking intellectual dishonesty?

Squirm, "Brian", squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 18:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Let the public record show that "Brian Good" is a cowardly little weasel, who, when challenged to call Dr. Harris, refused to follow through with the call BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE'S WRONG.

What's that I hear coming from the troofer camp in Palo Alto, CA?

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

Now, go lick your wounds, weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 18:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hearsay evidence from a liar doesn't count, GutterBall. Even if Dr. Harris said what you claim (and there's no reason to believe it), such a weasely endorsement is not worth the paper it's not printed on.

 
At 15 July, 2010 18:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, weasel, continue to STONEWALL.

Clue time, fucktard.

The cowardice you constantly display fools no one.

 
At 15 July, 2010 19:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Let the public record show that "Brian Good" is a cowardly little weasel and a compulsive liar, who claims: [1] that he's taken courses in music theory, but he can't answer an elementary question about modal theory; [2] that he's an expert on the World Trade Center Towers' collapse mechanism, but he can't answer elementary questions directly related to the subject; [3] that he refuses to call Dr. Harris because he knows Dr. Harris will confirm my argument.

Have a nice day, weasel.

 
At 15 July, 2010 20:29, Anonymous New Yorker said...

You guys are hampered by a cripple epistemology.

Stop using big words you don't understand, Petgoat.

I'm not lying, Bill. You haven't named one independent engineer who publicly endorsed the NIST report. Prove me wrong. Why isn't that easy for you?

False.

Hearsay evidence from a liar doesn't count, GutterBall. Even if Dr. Harris said what you claim (and there's no reason to believe it), such a weasely endorsement is not worth the paper it's not printed on.

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

 
At 15 July, 2010 20:31, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Let the public record show that "Brian Good" is a cowardly little weasel and a compulsive liar, who claims: [1] that he's taken courses in music theory, but he can't answer an elementary question about modal theory;

Oh, he's claiming this now? That's funny, as he used to claim he knew what words like "epistemology" meant when he was 6 years old.

It's amazing that this utter genius is nothing more than a failed janitor. Too bad the engineering community won't accept the threat he represents to their entire profession.

 
At 15 July, 2010 21:52, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, the reasons I won't answer your questions is because they are immaterial and not worth my time.

Keep lying New Yorker; you're not very good at it but as far as I can tell you can't do anything else.

The fact remains that you have not provided the name of one independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report.

 
At 15 July, 2010 22:12, Anonymous New Yorker said...

GutterBall, the reasons I won't answer your questions is because they are immaterial and not worth my time.

This. Is. HILARIOUS. Brian, since when have any of your questions been worth the time of anyone?

Keep lying New Yorker; you're not very good at it but as far as I can tell you can't do anything else.

You keep claiming I lie, but you don't give any examples. Please point out where I have lied, Brian.

The fact remains that you have not provided the name of one independent engineer who has publicly endorsed the NIST report.

And nobody cares.

 
At 15 July, 2010 23:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

For one lie among many, you claimed that GuitarBill has named an independent engineer who publicly endorsed the NIST report.

 
At 15 July, 2010 23:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What did you say, weasel?

Did someone notice that a weasel tried post to the blog?

If a compulsive liar and a weasel shits in the woods, will anybody hear him?

 
At 15 July, 2010 23:47, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall would you mind providing proof of your assertions?

All you need is a name, and you haven't got it.

 
At 16 July, 2010 00:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Say what? Did you hear something?

Did someone notice that a weasel tried post to the blog?

If a compulsive liar and a weasel shits in the woods, will anybody hear him?

 
At 16 July, 2010 00:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

IOW, GuitarBill can not back up his claims. He's compleat bullshit.

 
At 16 July, 2010 00:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What was that? Did you hear something?

Was that a weasel?

If a smarmy, child molesting compulsive liar shits in the woods, will anybody hear him?

 
At 16 July, 2010 03:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

New Yorker wrote, "...Oh, he's claiming this now? That's funny, as he used to claim he knew what words like 'epistemology' meant when he was 6 years old."

Yes, he claims to grasp music theory and its intricacies. Here's a link to the post where he claims to posses knowledge of music theory.

Source: SLC: There's nothing mysterious about the mixolydian mode. I had that shit in junior college.

Apparently, in the rarefied air that "Brian Good" inhabits, the inability to answer a question proves that he can answer the question. Of course, there's nothing strange or unusual about that, I suppose.

To add insult to injury, I challenged the illustrious "Brian Good" to demonstrate his ability to answer elementary questions about the Twin Towers in the vain hope that his answer's might provide a baseline upon which we could proceed to discuss the Tower's collapse mechanism. Here's a link to my questions:

Source: SLC: A few elementary questions for "Brian Good."

As you'll probably guess, the weasel refused to answer my questions, because my elementary questions are--and I quote: "immaterial and not worth my time." Of course, in the twisted opinion of "Brian Good," weasel for 9/11 troof, questions concerning engineering and construction of the Twin Towers are "immaterial" when posited to a blog dedicated to the collapse of the Twin Towers and related issues. Again, there's nothing unusual about that, I suppose.

That said, I think it's clear who we're dealing with, and I think the time has come to relegate the oxygen thief, "Brian Good", to the dustbin of SLC history.

Do you agree, New Yorker?

I wonder, moreover, if Pat and James B. agree with my assessment of the "Brian Good" dilemma?

Obviously, I'd appreciate a comment or two from Pat and James B. on the "Brian Good" problem. After all, SLC is ultimately their responsibility.

Specifically, I'd like to know why Pat and James B. allow "Brian Good" to pollute their blog with nonsense that can only be attributed to an aggressive psychopath, who displays the following classic characteristics of psychopathy: [1] glibness and superficial charm; [2] grandiose sense of self-worth; [3] pathological lying; [4] cunning and manipulative behavior; [5] lack of remorse or guilt; [6] emotionally shallow; [7] callous behavior and lack of empathy; [8] failure to accept responsibility for his own actions; [9] socially deviant lifestyle; [10] need for stimulation and proneness to boredom; [11] parasitic lifestyle; [12] poor behavioral control; [13] promiscuous sexual behavior; [14] lack of realistic, long-term goals; [15] impulsiveness; [16] irresponsibility; and [17] juvenile behavior.

Naturally, I'm curious; thus, would Pat and James B. care to chime in on this situation?

 
At 16 July, 2010 05:40, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'It's silly bad,but not half as bad as the pathetic "music" that delusional chappies like Sackdoily think is oh,so hip.Like the Stranglers and the Sex Pistols and all that drain-pipe trousers garbage.'

Walt shows how up to date he is with the music scene in the UK. Was this the stuff we were all listening to in 1995 (or was it 1997)?

Arseholie seems to have a bit of a fixation with us. Do you think he might be lonely?

 
At 16 July, 2010 06:24, Anonymous New Yorker said...

For one lie among many, you claimed that GuitarBill has named an independent engineer who publicly endorsed the NIST report.

He has. Dr. Harris. You lose again, Petgoat.

GutterBall would you mind providing proof of your assertions?

He has. You lose again, Petgoat.

IOW, GuitarBill can not back up his claims. He's compleat (sic) bullshit.

False. Seek professional help, Petgoat.

 
At 16 July, 2010 08:09, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arseholie seems to have a bit of a fixation with us. Do you think he might be lonely?"

Maybe if he bathed occasionlly?

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Yorker, please show us where Dr. Harris has endorsed the NIST report publicly. I can't find it.

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:31, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

If there's a nuttier fruitcake on this planet than the Yuppie Plonker you'd have to produce a locker full of hard evidence to sway me.The Nutty Professor couldn't carry the "Git's" jockstrap with a wheelbarrow! They've left goofy Troyo and Nico Haupt in the wake of the wackiest juggernaut ever seen on the 'net.Pornboy has been rendered a non-entity compared to those two nutjobs.Talk about polluting a blog!

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:35, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

Plus,they have a handsomely uniformed lackey and food tester:the dumbass "New Yorker".

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:41, Blogger Triterope said...

Please show us where Dr. Harris has endorsed the NIST report publicly. I can't find it.

Yeah, I'll bet you can't.

 
At 16 July, 2010 09:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't, and neither can you.

 
At 16 July, 2010 11:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What was that? Did you hear something?

Was that a weasel?

If a smarmy, child molesting compulsive liar shits in the woods, will anybody hear him?

 
At 16 July, 2010 12:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, my hat's off to ya, you've done what I thought was impossible--you've made "retarded marmoset" Lazarus look clever.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What was that? Did you hear something?

Was that a weasel?

If a smarmy, logic molesting compulsive liar shits in the woods, will anybody hear him?

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GutterBall, most people are pretty quiet in the woods, but I bet when you shit there's a whole lot of whoop whoop whooping going on.

 
At 16 July, 2010 13:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Listening to you and your idiotic, uninformed rants is like having to listen to a eunuch discuss the Kama Sutra.

Persist with half truths innuendos and outright lies to your heart's content, psychopath. I am tired, moreover, of pointing out to you what you find so difficult to comprehend, that most everyone else sees upfront. I apologize for insisting in my foolhardy attempts to teach the pig to sing.

From now on, all you'll get from me is ridicule.

You made your bed, scumbag; now you lay in it.

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:01, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All I'll get is ridicule, because it's all you have left. You lied in claiming that you had 14 independent engineers endorsing the NIST report, you tried to cover that up with obfuscating spam, then by citing a document that did not say what you claimed, and now by expecting us to accept your hearsay account as if it were a public statement.

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You are doing a disservice to your troof movement by your pedantic self serving ringing endorsement of fallacy.

Tell us, is your worthless life dedicated to spreading ignorance?

 
At 16 July, 2010 14:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kindly link to a public statement by an independent engineer endorsing the NIST report. You can't do it.

250 licensed engineers question the validity of the NIST report and have said so publicly.

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:06, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
All I'll get is ridicule"

Stop for a minute and think about that stement, brian.

Think long and hard.

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's to think? Ridicule is all this forum has ever been about. For some reason you guys seem to be really really nervous about the idea that 9/11 wasn't the way the government says it was, so you huddle around sharing misinformation and supporting each other.

You also seem to have a great need to feel superior to others, so you put enormous energies into sneering at people you regard as dumber than dirt, which seems like a strange way to spend time.

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:24, Blogger Triterope said...

I can't, and neither can you.

Well, you're half right. That's above average for you.

 
At 16 July, 2010 15:27, Blogger Triterope said...

you put enormous energies into sneering at people you regard as dumber than dirt, which seems like a strange way to spend time.

Have you ever turned on a television?

 
At 16 July, 2010 19:32, Anonymous New Yorker said...

New Yorker, please show us where Dr. Harris has endorsed the NIST report publicly. I can't find it.

GuitarBill already did.

All I'll get is ridicule, because it's all you have left. You lied in claiming that you had 14 independent engineers endorsing the NIST report, you tried to cover that up with obfuscating spam, then by citing a document that did not say what you claimed, and now by expecting us to accept your hearsay account as if it were a public statement.

Stop lying, Petgoat.

Kindly link to a public statement by an independent engineer endorsing the NIST report. You can't do it.

Kindly link to a public statement by an independent engineer endorsing the theory of gravity. You can't do it.

250 licensed engineers question the validity of the NIST report and have said so publicly.

And nobody cares.

What's to think? Ridicule is all this forum has ever been about.

What do you expect? I imagine most of us come here to laugh at the lunacy you post. Your "evidence" for a cover-up on 9/11 is a bunch of nonsense about widows and rakes and meatballs and smolder carpets and Dr. Sunder and Dr. Harris that no sane person would ever take seriously.

For some reason you guys seem to be really really nervous about the idea that 9/11 wasn't the way the government says it was, so you huddle around sharing misinformation and supporting each other.

See what I mean about laughing at your lunacy. Just read what you wrote. How could anyone NOT laugh at this?

You also seem to have a great need to feel superior to others, so you put enormous energies into sneering at people you regard as dumber than dirt, which seems like a strange way to spend time.

Well, we do regard you as dumber than dirt, so you've got that right, but seriously, how much time do I spend per day here? 10-15 minutes? It's a quick break to laugh at the lunatics. I'd feel sorry for you if you weren't so dedicated to a sinister conspiracy theory that blames the US government for the mass murder of its own citizens without a shred of evidence to back up said accusation.

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:39, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
What's to think?"


Ridicule is all you deserve.

Shit for brains.

 
At 16 July, 2010 20:40, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"You also seem to have a great need to feel superior to others"

brian, we ARE superior to you.

Think about that long and hard, too.

 
At 17 July, 2010 06:15, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

All you get is ridicule.

The sane people here are superior to you.

Connect the dots.

 
At 17 July, 2010 06:22, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'If there's a nuttier fruitcake on this planet than the Yuppie Plonker you'd have to produce a locker full of hard evidence to sway me.'

Yuppies are from the 1980s, Arseholie. More proof - if any was required - that you've never visited my country, let alone got laid here.

Got any more stories to tell us?

 
At 17 July, 2010 09:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Yorker, your claim that GlitterBawl has provided a public endorsement of NIST is a lie.

I have linked to Mr. Brookman's endorsement of the laws of physics.
It's easily found.

 
At 17 July, 2010 09:33, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

All you get is ridicule.

The sane people here are superior to you.

Connect the dots.

 
At 17 July, 2010 09:45, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The dots are connected. You clowns haven't got an argument, and all you can do is sit around in a pathetic mutual admiration society endorsing each other's lies and sniggering at each other's juvenile jokes.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Bite me, shit stain.

So tell us, psychopath, when will you get back to this thread and apologize to us for lying--you quote mining cretin?

And remember, dissembler for 9/11 troof, I OWN your sorry ass.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I didn't post on the robo thread. Say, do you suppose that was Brian Good who all you guys seem to have a big crush on?

You don't own my ass, GlitterBill. You don't even own your own "whooped" ass.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Is lying all you know, shit stain.

Still in denial, shit stain?

So tell us, psychopath, when will you return to this thread and apologize to us for lying?

Coward.

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:35, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GlitterBill, you seem to believe that there's only one Anonymous here and that all of them are Brian Good.

Have you considered a career as a cyber-psychic?

 
At 17 July, 2010 11:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Bullshit!

Come on, shit stain, lie to us again.

So, where's the apology you us, child molester?

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh you don't believe that there's only one Anonymous and that all of them are Brian Good?

I'm not responsible for everything every Anonymous says.

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Me neither!

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nor me!

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Damn right!

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like it's unanimous!

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Speak for yourself!

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Quit impersonating me!

 
At 17 July, 2010 13:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're all imposters! I am the true Anonymous!

 
At 17 July, 2010 14:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What does that prove, psychopath?

The only thing you've proven is that you're willing to resort to sock puppets.

Your lies are as transparent as Saran Wrap.

 
At 17 July, 2010 20:54, Anonymous Anonymous said...

BUMP for the Billshitter

Anonymous said...

How about billshitter putting his money where his mouth is and post up some of his great music? I`m sure someone has one of his 'gigs" on video. Since hes a pro and all.

15 July, 2010 17:20
Anonymous said...

Heres where he`ll say hes worried the twoofers will come get him.

15 July, 2010 17:21


Id really like to see GB respond to this.He gives us a picture of some ConwaY Twitty character, so why not some video of his greatness crooning a few songs.
Shouldnt be that hard in this day and age.
Unless, you know..hes lying.

 
At 17 July, 2010 21:14, Anonymous New Yorker said...

New Yorker, your claim that GlitterBawl has provided a public endorsement of NIST is a lie.

False.

I have linked to Mr. Brookman's endorsement of the laws of physics.

Which is not an endorsement of the theory of gravity by an independent engineer. You're not too bright, are you?

The dots are connected. You clowns haven't got an argument, and all you can do is sit around in a pathetic mutual admiration society endorsing each other's lies and sniggering at each other's juvenile jokes.

Psychiatric help, Brian. Please look into it.

 
At 17 July, 2010 23:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Id [SIC] really like to see GB respond to this.He gives us a picture of some ConwaY Twitty [SIC] character, so why not some video of his greatness crooning a few songs."

That's right, intellectual midget, when your back's against the wall, CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

Tell us, troofer scum, how many innocent people have the 9/11 troofers murdered in cold blood?

 
At 17 July, 2010 23:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Heres where he`ll say hes [SIC] worried the twoofers will come get him."

Shove this in your craw, spelling bee champ.

My friend, Perry Logan, made the mistake of using his real name while debating 9/11 troofers. Fortunately, he's alive; nevertheless, he lived to regret it.

I'll let Perry explain why troofers are dangerous. Take it away, Perry.

"...As a public critic of the 9/11 "Truth" Movement, I can safely confirm that conspiracy people are the most ad hominem people I have ever encountered. They are far worse than right-wingers.

"As critics of conspiracy theories know, the first reaction of any conspiracy theorist to any criticism is to call the critic a government agent--always without a shred of proof.

"So the weapon of choice for conspiracy buffs is immediate, undocumented, ad hominem attack.

"Consider the massive egotism of this behavior. 'Who but a paid government agent could disagree with this brilliant theory? It's the only possible explanation!' These people are such geniuses the government has to pay someone to come to a forum and disagree with them!

"The truth is, conspiracy people are absolutely infuriated by challenges to their theories and will instantly attack anyone who dares to disagree.

"It doesn't matter how polite you try to be. Disagreeing with a conspiracy theorist is a thought-crime, punishable by ceaseless character assassination.

"I have had conspiracy people threaten me countless times (though, like their right-wing brothers, they're too chickensh*t to do anything). One Truther wrote poison-pen letters to various organizations around town, accusing me of various imaginary crimes.

"After all, I'm obviously a government agent, so it's OK to smear my reputation, right?

"Another Truther punished me by making obscene YouTube videos falsely accusing me of being gay. Satiric videos would have been OK. But these clips were just semi-pornographic attacks on my character, tinged with homophobia, and I was able to get YouTube to remove them.

"Take it from me--you pay a high price for daring to disagree with these pr*cks.

"It's some comfort to note that the Truthers fight with one another constantly--and when this happens, they call one another agents and attack one another, just like they attack the rest of us. I'll bet almost all Truthers have been called CIA agents---by other Truthers!
-- Perry Logan, 30 May 2009.

Source: AlterNet: How a Conspiracy Theorist Who Thought I Was the Zodiac Killer Almost Ruined My Life

Any questions, troofer?

 
At 18 July, 2010 09:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Yorker, there is no reason for an engineer to endorse the theory of gravity. Engineering is an applied science. Ron Brookman's endorsement of the laws of physics would include the law of gravity.

Poor GutterBall didn't have a gig last night and it made him surly. I bet it made his wife surly too. I hope she had a nice Saturday Night.

Perry Logan? Never heard of him!

 
At 18 July, 2010 10:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Poor GutterBall didn't have a gig last night...

Really No kidding?

Is that weak bullshit all you have, shit-for-brains?

 
At 18 July, 2010 11:32, Blogger Triterope said...

New Yorker, there is no reason for an engineer to endorse the theory of gravity.

RIGHT!

Now think really, really, really, really, really hard about how this argument might apply to the NIST report.

 
At 18 July, 2010 11:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...New Yorker, there is no reason for an engineer to endorse the theory of gravity."

Duplicity, thy name is troofer.

 
At 18 July, 2010 11:52, Blogger Triterope said...

How a Conspiracy Theorist Who Thought I Was the Zodiac Killer Almost Ruined My Life

Wow. That was scary, as was the Perry Logan story. Thanks for the reminder of just how unhinged these conspiracy people are, and what they're capable of.

I especially liked this line:

When you know something terribly important that the entire world thinks is hooey, it gets harder and harder to let it go.

Sound like anyone we know?

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Triterope wrote, "...Thanks for the reminder of just how unhinged these conspiracy people are, and what they're capable of."

You're welcome, Triterope.

Patrick from Cincinnati's warning, as concerns revealing your identity to a troofer, is spot on.

Disregard his warning at your peril.

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:10, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NY, GB, you are failing to distinguish between the theory of gravity, which is irrelevant to engineering issues; and the law of gravity, which is essential to them.

Mr. Brookman has endorsed the law of gravity. There is no reason for him to endorse any theory of gravity.

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The retard for 9/11 troof dissembles, "...NY, GB, you are failing to distinguish between the theory of gravity, which is irrelevant to engineering issues; and the law of gravity, which is essential to them."

Too stupid for words, aren't you, 'tard?

Smokin' crack again, nincompoop?

Gravitational Theory helps us explain the phenomenon we call Gravity.

Thus, if a troofer drops his bag of crack the Law of Gravity dictates that the dope will strike the ground.

On the other hand, Gravitational Theory explains why the bag of crack fell to the ground.

Hence, gravity is a law; however, gravitational theory is required to explain the phenomenon.

Got it, 'tard?

Have another toke off your crack pipe, cretin.

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:26, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
NY, GB, you are failing to distinguish between the theory of gravity, which is irrelevant to engineering issues"

Except for that whole "if you don't pay attention to it your buildings fall down" thing.

My goodnesss, you're stupid.

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:45, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is not necessary to explain why gravity works to explain why a building falls down. It is only necessary to understand how it works. The former is the realm of the theory of gravity, the latter the realm of the law of gravity.

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Babbling again, 'tard?

 
At 18 July, 2010 12:52, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't mind LL, GutterBall. He can't help his limitations.

 
At 18 July, 2010 13:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Actually, I like LL's comment.

 
At 18 July, 2010 14:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You would.

 
At 18 July, 2010 14:29, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Tell us about it, welcher.

 
At 18 July, 2010 17:42, Anonymous New Yorker said...

RIGHT!

Now think really, really, really, really, really hard about how this argument might apply to the NIST report.


Oops! Brian Good fucked up! No wonder he's suddenly stopped babbling about independent engineers endorsing the NIST report and is instead babbling incoherently about gravity.

 
At 18 July, 2010 18:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sorry you lack the cognitive skills to distinguish between the theory of gravity (its causes) and the law of gravity (its effects) but it's not my fault.

I'm starting to think you guys have a crush on Brian Good.

 
At 19 July, 2010 15:02, Anonymous Arhoolie the Sackdoily Masher! said...

The poor,poor pitiful Nutty Professor throws in the towel and trudges back to the pub for one more in a series of nightcaps.That's OK Dogboy,it's been a pleasure kicking your pretentious butt up and down this website!! Good luck in your precarious and addled future,jerkoff.For the record,goofball,the 'Yuppie Plonker" lives in the USA (apparently) and this country is crawling with shitty Yuppies exactly like him.Best,Arhoolie V.(as in Vanunu,the jailed one.Over in Israel.The country without nuclear weapons).

 
At 19 July, 2010 16:43, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie the Sackdoily Masher! said...
The poor,poor pitiful Nutty Professor throws in the towel and trudges back to the pub for one more in a series of nightcaps.That's OK Dogboy,it's been a pleasure kicking your pretentious butt up and down this website!! Good luck in your precarious and addled future,jerkoff.For the record,goofball,the 'Yuppie Plonker" lives in the USA (apparently) and this country is crawling with shitty Yuppies exactly like him.Best,Arhoolie V.(as in Vanunu,the jailed one.Over in Israel.The country without nuclear weapons)."

By means of necessity, it is obvious that the paralogisms of practical reason are the clue to the discovery of in other words, the Ideal, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions, it is not at all certain that our sense perceptions constitute the whole content for therefore with the sole exception of our understanding, our judgements. But this need not worry us.

 
At 19 July, 2010 17:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...For the record,goofball,the 'Yuppie Plonker" lives in the USA (apparently) and this country is crawling with shitty Yuppies exactly like him.Best,Arhoolie V.(as in Vanunu,the jailed one.Over in Israel.The country without nuclear weapons).

ArseHooligan, when will you learn that Vanunu was not thrown in an Israeli prison because he exposed Israel's alleged "nuclear weapons arsenal"--you fuckin' git?

Vanunu was convicted on charges of espionage, which is a very serious crime. He deserved every day he spent in that prison.

Got it, numbnuts?

Now, go play in the freeway.

 
At 20 July, 2010 01:12, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'The poor,poor pitiful Nutty Professor throws in the towel and trudges back to the pub for one more in a series of nightcaps.That's OK Dogboy,it's been a pleasure kicking your pretentious butt up and down this website!! Good luck in your precarious and addled future,jerkoff.For the record,goofball,the 'Yuppie Plonker" lives in the USA (apparently) and this country is crawling with shitty Yuppies exactly like him.Best,Arhoolie V.(as in Vanunu,the jailed one.Over in Israel.The country without nuclear weapons).'

Translation from Spastic into English follows:

'I admit that I'm a complete loser and I have no life. I'm reduced to making up stories about my past - complete with a non-existent combat record, and imaginary girlfriends and children - in a vain attempt to persuade myself that my existence had not been meaningless, and that I'm not a waste of DNA and Oxygen. My rants are a thinly-disguised attempt to hide my inadequacy as a human being, and one day I will realise that it's time for me to swallow the Drano. Until then, I'm afraid I'm just going to have to keep coming back to this site, as you're the only friends I have on this cold, miserable world. I'm so unhappy. I'm so, so unhappy'.

This service was provided courtesy of Waltinterp, TM. Dedicated to exposing sad cases and fantasists across the globe.

 
At 20 July, 2010 08:30, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

Nice try you stupid "Git"! And Iraq was crawling with WMD's and we just had to get over there immediately! You sure are an amazing little boy.

 
At 20 July, 2010 08:34, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

Game,set,match! The Nutty Professor collapses into a heap at the end of the bar,right into his pastie box!! Talk about destroying a twit,I've turned the Moldy Barfly into an Arhoolie fanatic!!! Rap on,brother,rap on!!

 
At 20 July, 2010 09:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...Nice try you stupid 'Git'! And Iraq was crawling with WMD's and we just had to get over there immediately! You sure are an amazing little boy."

That's all you have, ArseHooligan on Hammond B-3?

How does "Iraq was crawling with WMD's [SIC] and we just had to get over there immediately" address my comment concerning Mordechai Vanunu and the prison term he served for espionage?

Are you brain damaged?

 
At 20 July, 2010 09:42, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Are you brain damaged?"

Yes.

Yes he is.

 
At 20 July, 2010 16:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Still waiting for GB to link us to some of his tunes. The homo cant be afraid of showing others his music, can he?

 
At 20 July, 2010 17:15, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

Credit where credit is due!! Terry Jones on keys raised a larf!

 
At 20 July, 2010 17:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I'll tell you what, "Brian", I'll post my YouTube links (and they exist) just as soon as you pass the GED examination. Okay?

 
At 21 July, 2010 05:29, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'And Iraq was crawling with WMD's and we just had to get over there immediately!'

You should know, Walt. You served there for 36 months as a special forces operator, didn't you?

'Talk about destroying a twit,I've turned the Moldy Barfly into an Arhoolie fanatic!!! Rap on,brother,rap on!!'

My spastic-to-English translator has just broken down. Can anyone help?

 
At 21 July, 2010 05:29, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'And Iraq was crawling with WMD's and we just had to get over there immediately!'

You should know, Walt. You served there for 36 months as a special forces operator, didn't you?

'Talk about destroying a twit,I've turned the Moldy Barfly into an Arhoolie fanatic!!! Rap on,brother,rap on!!'

My spastic-to-English translator has just broken down. Can anyone help?

 
At 21 July, 2010 08:36, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

Is there a sadder sack on the Planet Earth than the Nutty Professor? We've asked him a thousand times to show us that Arhoolie posed as a vet and all he can do is flail around miserably like the drunken stooge he is.Next,he'll be asking me to send him naked pictures of myself.You've been crushed,jackoff,get over it.Great Ceaser's Ghost!!!

 
At 21 July, 2010 08:39, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

And just look at the insane Fretboy trying a pathetic skedaddle forward on his nutty "Israel has no nuclear weapons" jihad!!! You're crazy,Daddy.

 
At 21 July, 2010 08:45, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

Is there a sadder sack on the Planet Earth than the Nutty Professor? We've asked him a thousand times to show us that Arhoolie posed as a vet and all he can do is flail around miserably like the drunken stooge he is.Next,he'll be asking me to send him naked pictures of myself.You've been crushed,jackoff,get over it.Great Ceaser's Ghost!!!

 
At 21 July, 2010 10:54, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...And just look at the insane Fretboy trying a pathetic skedaddle forward on his nutty "Israel has no nuclear weapons" jihad!!! You're crazy,Daddy."

What was that, scat muncher?

I waiting patiently for you to provide something other than speculation, opinion and unsubstantiated allegations to prove that Israel has a nuclear arsenal.

In fact, I'm waiting to for you to substantiate ANY claim you've made concerning ANY issue.

Hell, you're so lazy that you won't take a moment to research Vanunu's criminal record, which states clearly that he was convicted on charges of espionage.

Tell us, ArseHooligan, what evidence did Vanunu present to back his story?

Photographs?

Here's an article from the Boston Globe circa 1988.

ISRAEL CONVICTS VANUNU OF TREASON, SPYING

"JERUSALEM - Mordechai Vanunu, the former nuclear technician who sold details of Israel's ALLEGED nuclear weapons stockpile to a British newspaper, was convicted yesterday of treason and espionage.

"The five-minute session in Jerusalem District Court ended seven months of mostly secret court proceedings before a panel of three judges.

"In the end, the judges unanimously found Vanunu guilty of treason and two counts of 'aggravated espionage'--spying with intent to harm Israel's national security. The 34-year-old Vanunu is to be sentenced Sunday. The prosecutor has asked..."


Source: Boston Globe: ISRAEL CONVICTS VANUNU OF TREASON, SPYING.

Keep reading that word ALLEGED until you get it through your thick skull.

Alleged adj. Represented as existing or as being as described but not so proved; supposed.

Source: The Free Dictionary--alleged.

Photographs, moreover, are only considered evidence under certain strict conditions imposed by a court of law. Why? Because photographs are easy to alter. Additionally, Vanunu's photographs were never verified by a court of law (The London Times is not a court of law--you droolin' cretin); thus, they are considered hearsay.

Got it, cretin?

 
At 21 July, 2010 11:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Now, as an exercise, ArseHooligan, I want you to provide the definitions for two words:

[1] espionage;

and

[2] treason.

And I want hyperlinks back to the source of the definitions.

And when you're done, I will proceed to bar-b-que your stupid ass, once and for all.

Go for it, mental midget. I double-dare you.

 
At 21 July, 2010 12:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Once again, no response from The ArseHooligan.

Another monumental COP OUT. You're an acephalic coward, ArseHooligan

What's that I hear from the troofer camp?

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

 
At 22 July, 2010 05:03, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'We've asked him a thousand times to show us that Arhoolie posed as a vet and all he can do is flail around miserably like the drunken stooge he is.'

Unfortunately, the proof has disappeared along with the Haloscan posts. But it was pretty damn obvious that 'A Real Veteran' was your sock-puppet, because his comments were written in the same retarded style as your own (complete with the same insults).

Your laboured explanation to explain 'A Real Veteran's motivations for postings is also a dead giveway. In any case, 'ARV' hasn't made a free appearance since he was outed, which speaks for itself.

BTW, got any more new stories to tell us about your past?

 
At 22 July, 2010 07:48, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

The Gitfiddler on long distance public saxophone is actually sticking to his guns:Israel has no nuclear weapons,he says!!!!!!!! D'oh.Whatever you say,Jethro! Sorry,Chief,we don't drink Coors Light,eat at McDonalds OR get into the pigpen with insane Californians and their parlor room shenanigans,like creating a fictional proposition and then acting out a plausible debate. There's loopy,and then there's the Yuppie Plonker!!! You've lapped them all,even the Nutty Professor,Pornboy and the Troglodyte!! Soon the dumbass "New Yorker" will pipe in with a spirited bit of idiocy and after that SuperDudManBilbo will chime in with his warm and fuzzy nonsense,followed by the ConnedDumbo and the DopeyTriteFuck whingeing about banning Arhoolie!! The Debunker Cult has shot its wad and it's getting plain boring.Where's that shithead Ronald Weak when you need him? Wacking off to a picture of Philip Zelikow blowing Gravy,undoubtedly.

 
At 22 July, 2010 07:56, Anonymous Arhoolie Caesar said...

Good old clairvoyant Archie Snide! Dead in the water and folding his pitiful tent! Obvious to you,jackoff.But then it was obvious to you that there were WMD's in Iraq,too!If this is how you surmise things,jerkoff,well then you've admitted you're crazy.Thanks for fessing up,Nutty Professor.How convenient for you that the "evidence" was shredded! Now,it's back to reading Earl Grey tea leaves for you,Tiger!!

 
At 22 July, 2010 09:05, Blogger GuitarBill said...

ArseHooligan, I still don't see answers to my questions.

Do you think that your continued STONEWALLING goes unnoticed?

Now, answer the questions, coward.

"...Now, as an exercise, ArseHooligan, I want you to provide the definitions for two words:

"[1] espionage;

"and

"[2] treason.

"And I want hyperlinks back to the source of the definitions."


Now, get to work, cretin.

 
At 22 July, 2010 17:06, Anonymous Arhoolie,Sackdoily's master said...

Professor Meth has three children and a wife? So when does he actually see them,becuase he's spending fifteen hours a day at this site.That's them running down their street screaming:"Daddy's going off on another mixolydian scale tear again,Aaaaah!! Help!!!".

 
At 22 July, 2010 20:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I'm always with my wife and children, ArseHooligan. After all, I telecommute to work (that means I work from home over the internet).

Do you honestly believe that it takes hours of work every day to debunk the troofers? I have news for you, ArseHooligan, it doesn't take much work at all--it's child's play.

So, when will you answer my questions, coward?

 
At 24 July, 2010 07:05, Anonymous Arhoolie the "Git" Grinder said...

Phony,lying,insane twit.You're less than a weasel,you deluded nutjob.The "Git":The Wackiest Ship in the Debunker Navy!!

 
At 24 July, 2010 09:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, whines, "...Phony,lying,insane twit."

Projecting again, ArseHooligan?

Additionally, that's not an answer, ArseHooligan.

So, when will you answer my questions, coward?

You won't answer my questions because I handed your empty head to you.

The poor, deluded conspiracy mongering fool just can't get his shit together.

Pathetic.

 
At 25 July, 2010 11:16, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Walt, got some questions for you:

(1) Can you explain why (last May) you told us all that you'd spent three years in the UK from 1995, and then that subsequently changed to 1997?

(2) Can you explain why your ex-girlfriend (the dancing student) changed from a Brit (resident in South-East London) to a Yank (born in NYC) over the course of the same posts?

(3) Can you explain why your 'few months' in New Cross in 1995 (your May posts) became eight weeks in 1999 (your latest version)?

(4) Can you explain why you earlier described Ms Dancing Girl as the mother of your two children, and then you told us all in your most recent rants that they were all actually Mrs Arseholie's?

(5) Can you explain to me how you were able to support yourself in the UK (and your wife and baby boy), when by your own admission you didn't have a job, and you spent most of your time on the piss (including that moment when you honked your guts up in Charing Cross station - presumably after two shandies)?

Got any answers, Walt? Or are you going to tell us all some new lies?

 
At 26 July, 2010 10:03, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

Poor Sackdoily,lost his mind in another pub.

 
At 26 July, 2010 10:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Poor ArseHooligan, he lost his mind in a bag full of glue.

Inhale...exhale...

 
At 26 July, 2010 15:24, Anonymous Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...

The Googling "Git",never knows when to shut the fuck up.Yankees,baby!!

 
At 27 July, 2010 01:59, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

What's the matter Walt? Cat got your tongue?

PS: The word verification for this post is 'sarin'. I suggest you inhale some, and do the gene pool a favour.

 
At 27 July, 2010 10:33, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

"The Life and Times of Rupert Sackdoily" by an inebriated British wackjob with a heavy drinking schedule.It's been remaindered,so there's lots of copies down at Waterstones.

 
At 27 July, 2010 17:09, Anonymous Arhoolie the "Git" Smasher said...

Hi,I'm GuitarShrill,and I believe deeply in all whitewashes and official stories.My idol is Philip Zelikow and my wife and kids hate my guts,hence the computer has become my newest BFF!! I've been epically and insanely wrong a hundred times but I keep ploughing through.Wading through my own bullshit has proven treacherous,but I'll never,ever give up.Thankfully,I'm in a cult and nobody will oust me,or even correct me.To me,a circle jerk is a way of life.Hat tip to my boy BilboBaggedAgain for all the support.I also think Pornboy is a million laughs!! Bitchin',go for it!!

 
At 31 July, 2010 05:10, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

My life really, really sucks. I'm so lonely. Why won't anyone be my friend?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home