Building Wut Site Launched
As I mentioned the other day the "logic" chain that the Troofers have to go through to explain why WTC-7 is part of their conspiracy theory is too long and complex. As evidence, check out their updated website. If you can see anything on the front page that indicates why people should be paying attention, let me know. It almost looks like they want to talk about building codes:
Like Judge Lehner, millions of people do not know or remember only vaguely that a third tower called World Trade Center Building 7 also collapsed on September 11, 2001. In any other situation, the complete, free fall collapse of a 47-story skyscraper would be played over and over on the news. It would be discussed for years to come and building design codes would be completely rewritten. So, why does no one know about Building 7? And what made Building 7 come down?
posted by Pat @ 7:48 AM
15 comments
15 Comments:
I love those closing statements. It's like the whoever wrote it was successful in wiping the NIST report from their memory through self-hypnosis.
The evidence pages appear to have a lie on every one. McPadden's testimony is used. NIST is misrepresented and lied about over and over again.
Perhaps those four 9/11 survivors should be contacted and asked why they have lent their faces and reputations to spreading false information about 9/11. Very respectfully, of course! If one could be persuaded to pull their support and endorsement, the commercial couldn't air as cut.
But... building codes WERE rewritten. That's the whole point of what NIST does. Its not a "thermite investigation squad."
Perhaps those four 9/11 survivors should be contacted and asked why they have lent their faces and reputations to spreading false information about 9/11.
Survivors? They looked like actors to me. None of them were identified by name. I didn't recognize any of their faces as being those of Doyle, McIlvaine, or any of the Jersey Girls. And they were all a little too refined and a little too perfectly diverse to be real.
Which, if true, I have mixed feelings about. There's certainly nothing wrong with hiring actors to portray testimonials -- commercials do it all the time. But 9-11 Truth is always trying to pass itself off as more respectable than it really is.
Trite, it's definitely McIlvaine in the video, plus WAC-NY dude Manny Badillo and (IIRC) Sally Regenhard who was featured in the Press for Troof film. I'm not sure who the last woman is.
Survivors is perhaps the wrong word here - they are family members of victims. Normally, survivors would be fine, but in the case of 9/11, it sounds like they were in the buildings when they collapsed but lived. I guess I should say "family members".
Trite, it's definitely McIlvaine in the video, plus WAC-NY dude Manny Badillo and (IIRC) Sally Regenhard who was featured in the Press for Troof film. I'm not sure who the last woman is.
Okay then.
I just clicked the Donate link. Look who's running this show!
If Pat and James don't mind, I'm gonna be a blog ho here. I've got a post up about the new site. It's all the same old stuff with a pretty new package.
Hey, guys! Guys! Guess what, guys! Paul Joseph Watson has proof that NIST is trying to keep people from seeing video of the East Penthouse collapses, because there's totes an explosion right before it happens, you guys! Guys, it's not that the Truth Movement has been showing edited videos of the WTC7 collapse at all for ten years, you guys! It's totes NIST that is doing that!
Guys, this is huge!
It's not wind noise either, you guys. It's totes an explosion! And people are like so incredibly stunned by the explosion on the video that they don't even react until the whole outer shell starts to fall down! HUSH-A-BOOM IN ACTION, you guys!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus
unedited
Contrary to popular (i.e. retarded troofer) belief, not ALL controlled demolitions of buildings collapse into thier own footprint:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SiNeuuQXmM
OR straight down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_Pw9pSIhgU&feature=related
nor do they always go perfectly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwGE92upfQM&feature=related
And here's a compiliation with numerous examples of each of the above:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SR87czZOPw&feature=channel
So troofers, you're expecting us to believe that all these amazing coicedences happened at the same time, that WTC 7, collapsed nearly straight down, into it's own footprint, and went off without any problems?
Oh wait, it didn't collapse into it's own footprint:
http://www2.ae911truth.org/images/gallery/wtc7debris.jpg
As the above image from, ironicly, AE911TRUTH shows. If that's "in it's own footprint" then why is it spilling into the street? Was WTC built extending into the road?
Oh wait, it wasn't?:
http://911review.org/img/WTC7_View02.gif
Why would you lie about this, troofers?
It doesn't even matter what the claims are anymore. As long as there's enough material to pad out a standard-length media offering, Richard Gage will assemble it and put a price tag on it. And sell it to the same idiots who've been buying his shit (which is really David Ray Griffin's shit) all along.
Just the last month or so we've seen an annual broadsheet newspaper, a trip to Jamaica to speak at a pyramid-scheme convention, other speaking engagements, and this TV commercial (whose sole purpose seems to be raising more money to perpetuate itself).
Richard Gage's success is a testament to the gullibility of the 9-11 Truth movement.
Cute little twist of words here.
" In any other situation, the complete, free fall collapse of a 47-story skyscraper would be played over and over on the news"
FFA was not complete. But I guess it leaves enough wiggle room if they get called on it to say "well we didn't mean totally but just that it collapsed totally, not in free fall totally". While leaving the less knowledgeable with the impression that WTC7 fell in FFA the entire time.
Post a Comment
<< Home