Wednesday, January 05, 2011

For the Paranoid Nutjob Who Has Everything

I was rather amused to find out that Alex Jones has his own i-Phone app. Wait until Alex's fans find out that we have installed a hack that tracks all of the users through their GPS and forwards the data in real time to the black helicopters at the FEMA death camps....

Labels:

67 Comments:

At 06 January, 2011 00:05, Blogger Greg said...

I like the photoshopping to make him look thin.

 
At 06 January, 2011 03:44, Blogger edwardianbeauty said...

Alex Jones is not crazy. There are plenty of scholars who believe that 9/11 was an inside job.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646


http://www.911truth.org/index.php?topic=resources

If you look at the resources on the page there are so many groups of people who doubt the official 9/11 story. People from architects to politicians to firefighers.

What about the fact that a Danish scientist found nano thermite?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o&feature=player_embedded

Why did Bush just sit there if he did not know about it in advanced? He should have politely excused himself immediately.

Brittany

 
At 06 January, 2011 03:54, Blogger edwardianbeauty said...

http://grand-chessboard.com/blog/2010/08/28/debunking-the-debunkers-as-screw-loose-change-would-say-moron-dave-thomas/

http://www.youtube.com/user/citizenfor911truth1#p/c/C28F30E6627AB0E1

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/08/as-screw-loose-change-would-say-moron.html

You have been debunked

 
At 06 January, 2011 03:55, Blogger Garry said...

Somewhere there is a village missing its idiot.

 
At 06 January, 2011 04:53, Blogger TroyFromWV said...

Youtube is allowing me to make videos that are well over an hour long.


The Alex Jones Deception - 2nd Edition can be viewed on one video now rather than in parts.

Link....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-hxbhfwr0Y

 
At 06 January, 2011 05:36, Blogger TroyFromWV said...

Nano thermite?

Bush at the schoolhouse?

These people are so utterly stupid you know they have to be living off of some sort of govt assistance to survive.

 
At 06 January, 2011 06:44, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"There are plenty of scholars who believe that 9/11 was an inside job."

Said "scholars" are insane.

Sorta like you, actually.

 
At 06 January, 2011 07:28, Blogger John said...

All of those groups of people either were anti government before 9/11 (like left wing anarchists or radical right wingers) or were convinced by the quote mining and outright lies of the former. Or they were paranoid. They are also a minority to the thousands of scientists and architects who do support the official story.

The Bush school story is a non-issue because, if he did leave the school after the first plane hit, "truthers" could say "Bush knew it was coming because they had an exit strategy for him already in place. The first plane was the signal!"

Any thermate/thermite issues are debunked here:

http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm

and here:

http://www.911myths.com/html/traces_of_thermate_at_the_wtc.html

 
At 06 January, 2011 07:29, Blogger Bill said...

edwardianbeauty said...

"Blah blah blah...appeal to authority...blah blah blah...check out our crappy research published in a fake journal...blah blah blah...here is something completely irrelevant"

Edited for realism.

 
At 06 January, 2011 07:32, Blogger Bill said...

"All of those groups of people either were anti government before 9/11..."

And 1 of the "peer reviewers" of Jones & Harrit's intellectual masturbation session was David Griscom. A confirmed truther from as early as 2007. A non biased peer review by a guy who already believes the CD nonsense, and already believed in the Bush election conspiracy? Sounds real legitimate.

 
At 06 January, 2011 07:32, Blogger John said...

"You have been debunked"

The first site has no info, and every link I click gives me nothing.The last is weak, as all it does is repeat Stephen Jones' already debunked claims. So, no we haven't.

As for Alex Jones, see how well he stands up to debunkers here @ 4:43

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ikRc4ER2xY

 
At 06 January, 2011 09:13, Blogger Triterope said...

I like the photoshopping to make him look thin.

And calm. And well-groomed.

 
At 06 January, 2011 10:28, Blogger Erik said...

offtopic - contact instructions say use the 'sewer':

James B, Pat - re: the four posts on airfones; the comment threads aren't visible - what's the deal?
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/search/label/Airfones

Please restore the comment threads to public view.

Thanks!

 
At 06 January, 2011 10:52, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"Cosmos" outed himself as "Pat Cowardly" shortly after Pat Curly exposed the "Uncle Mickey" fraud."

-GoiterBrain

Do you have a source for this, or are you lying like Pat again?

 
At 06 January, 2011 10:55, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"The original Pat was wrong citing the RJ Lee report, as all it does is mention the presence of iron spheres, not their source. "
-"john"

Porta-John is full of shit again: the report states quite clearly where they came from. You either didn't read it, didn't understand it, or you're a lying ass. Not good for you either way, champ.

 
At 06 January, 2011 11:07, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"The iron microspheres reported in the RJ Lee report could easily have been caused by the steelworkers using acetylene torches on the steel during the rescue operation." (how retarded do you have to be not to believe this?) -Scat Cuntly

"Thus, the lightweight concrete is the primary source of the spheres."
-GoiterShill

"it is certain that torch-cutting of steel beams as part of the cleanup process contributed some, if not all, of the spherules seen in these samples." -R. Mackey, scientifically citing Pat's sources (i.e. his own ass)

Here we go again...I love how R. Mackey's powers of observation also led him to say that wtc7 "In no way resembled a CD". Now that's some Curleyesque dumbunkassing!

Finally: what caused the melted molybdenum cited by the USGS? Was that the torches too? What's your source?

 
At 06 January, 2011 11:11, Blogger Triterope said...

re: the four posts on airfones; the comment threads aren't visible - what's the deal?

Pat and James switched comment hosts sometime in 2009, and most comments before the switch are gone.

 
At 06 January, 2011 11:13, Blogger Ian G. said...

Finally: what caused the melted molybdenum cited by the USGS? Was that the torches too? What's your source?

They were planted by modified attack baboons under the command of Dick Cheney.

 
At 06 January, 2011 11:33, Blogger John said...

"Porta-John is full of shit again: the report states quite clearly where they came from. You either didn't read it, didn't understand it, or you're a lying ass."

Once again, please refrain from the ad hominem attacks. I have not called you any names.

As for your point, you're right. It says "Iron-rich spheres from iron-bearing building components or contents." The point of all this is that the spheres could have come from multiple sources other than thermate, such as fly ash in the concrete (which is an iron-bearing building component) or from the result of cutting of steel by torches after 9/11. So the presence of these spheres does not prove that thermate was involved, nor does it prove there ws a controlled demolition, despite what Steven Jones thinks.

 
At 06 January, 2011 11:43, Blogger John said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 06 January, 2011 11:45, Blogger John said...

"Here we go again...I love how R. Mackey's powers of observation also led him to say that wtc7 "In no way resembled a CD". Now that's some Curleyesque dumbunkassing!"

Actually, on page 116, R. Mackey says "visually, the collapse of WTC7 may have resembled a controlled demolition, at least form some perspectives. However, the collapse of WC could not be a "perfect imitation". The resemblence is limited strictly to the video, and contradicted by vibration, audio and preparation, in the opinion of demolition experts."

 
At 06 January, 2011 12:34, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"in the opinion of demolition experts."

You mean like Danny Jowenko, porta-johnny?

He also said WTC7 "in no way resembled" a CD, so your hero is trying to have it both ways. All you and he want to do is sound authoritative, but you haven't actually 'debunked' anything at all, and you know it.

"As for your point, you're right. It says "Iron-rich spheres from iron-bearing building components or contents." -Porta John

I know I'm right, cunt, but what you're failing utterly to point out is that the RJ Lee report says MUCH MORE about the origin of the spheres, how many there were, and about the temperatures required to put them there. Once again, either you didn't read it, you misunderstood its content, or you're lying like Pat. Twice now.

You make futile attempts to mis-direct the argument to 'melted steel' fly ash, or torches, yet you've never cited any sources from real scientists who actually worked with the dust. The RJ Lee group did, and now you're making shit up about what the report says. Truly PAThetic.

nice dodge on the molybdenum too, by the way. Fat Pat the Quiet Coward could only dream of being so agile.

 
At 06 January, 2011 12:49, Blogger John said...

"porta-johnny"

"Porta John"

"cunt"

Since you are insulting me, after I asked you not to, I'm done with you. The other posters here can deal with your bullshit theories and your immaturity.

This is why I don't post here that often. It always descends into a flame war. And I've got better things to do with my time.

I will leave you with these final thoughts: There will never be another investigation of 9/11. EVER. And you will waste your life fighting for one. I take a lot of satisfaction in that. Remember that on your deathbed.

 
At 06 January, 2011 13:11, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"I'm done with you. The other posters here can deal with your bullshit theories and your immaturity." - John, clogged up with Shit yet again.

Translation: "WAAAAAHHHH WAAAAAAH, you saw right through Mackey's and my bullshit, which never actually proved or debunked ANYTHING, and now I'm pretending that your insults drove me away from here, instead of the sound defeat of my impotent speculation."

Sounds a lot like Pat, except with a lot more words and fake umbrage.

How's that Molybdenum research coming, anyway?


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
At 06 January, 2011 13:27, Blogger TroyFromWV said...

I will leave you with these final thoughts: There will never be another investigation of 9/11. EVER. And you will waste your life fighting for one. I take a lot of satisfaction in that. Remember that on your deathbed.

That was beautiful!

 
At 06 January, 2011 13:27, Blogger Ian G. said...

Since you are insulting me, after I asked you not to, I'm done with you. The other posters here can deal with your bullshit theories and your immaturity.

There's not much one can do with the true believers left in the "truth" movement. They're not interested in reason, only in winning an internet pissing match.

That's why I much prefer pointing out that Pat Cowardly has never been laid in his life. He gets really pissed, which just confirms how much it bothers him that he's a hopeless virgin.

Unfortunately, you've gotta stoop to their level.

 
At 06 January, 2011 13:36, Blogger paulthew said...

"There are plenty of scholars who believe that 9/11 was an inside job."

OMG!!! This is unbelievable!! Why has this been hidden???

"If you look at the resources on the page there are so many groups of people who doubt the official 9/11 story. People from architects to politicians to firefighers."

OMG!!! I had no idea!!! This is unbelievable!!!

"What about the fact that a Danish scientist found nano thermite?"

OMG!! Nano thermite?? Why haven't we been told????

"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o&feature=player_embedded"

OMG!!! YouTube!!! How long has this site been up???

"Why did Bush just sit there if he did not know about it in advanced? He should have politely excused himself immediately."

Bush was a President??

OMG!!!

 
At 06 January, 2011 13:37, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Why did Bush just sit there if he did not know about it in advanced? He should have politely excused himself immediately."

This one clearly shows the inability of truthers to think in a critical manner.

Don't you think if Bush knew this attack was going to happen he would NOT arrange to look weak and non-presidential by sitting there reading a children's book? Don't you think he would instead fix it so he was in the White House, in charge, looking unafraid and defiant in the face of this crisis?

You see this is asking critical question of the bullshit people like Jones sell. It's why guys like me are not the suckers on this issue.

 
At 06 January, 2011 14:09, Blogger Garry said...

're: the four posts on airfones; the comment threads aren't visible - what's the deal?'

When the blog changed from Haloscan comments to Blogger, it lost all the previous content.

Anyway, you might want to read these:

http://www.911myths.com/html/the_9_11_calls_weren_t_real.html
http://www.911myths.com/html/mobiles_at_altitude.html
http://www.911myths.com/html/barbara_olson.html

'Pat Cowardly', AKA Cosmos - all-round scumbag, reduced to claiming that his uncle died on 9/11 - mentions Jowenko. The lying little shit doesn't mention any of this:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=64261

 
At 06 January, 2011 14:13, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Finally: what caused the melted molybdenum cited by the USGS? Was that the torches too? What's your source?

The source of the melted molybdenum, like the source of the melted iron, is in fact multiple sources, none of which are terribly important.

I wonder why "Andrew Bernstein's" Uncle Mickey interview with Ain't it Cool News contains no information about Mark Rothenberg that wasn't already published somewhere. Do you think maybe "Andrew Bernstein" just lied about knowing Rothenberg at all?

 
At 06 January, 2011 14:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Andrew Bernstein (aka "Cosmos," "Pat Cowardly") a liar?

Say it isn't so, number one.

%^)

 
At 06 January, 2011 14:27, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

Alex Jones is not crazy...he is a con man. He has found an audience that he can exploit, and because most of his audience are mental defects they will never catch on.

When Art Bell refused to buy into the troffer bullshit they found Alex Jones. Just so we're clear, the guy who rode to fame on UFOs, Area 51, Sasquatch, Men in Black, and Shadow People thinks the troofers are full of shit.

That's all you need to know.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:00, Blogger edwardianbeauty said...

You know what you need to do? You need to debate the webmaster of debunking the debunkers and the youtube channel I posted. That's all you need to do to convince me and other truthers.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:17, Blogger edwardianbeauty said...

If 9/11 was not an inside job why is it that the government refuses to be investigated by an independent organization? The government should be jumping at the chance they are innocent.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Why should we feel compelled to convince you of anything?

After all, you're a lunatic.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here we go again. The oh so honest troofer is asking us to prove a negative.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:27, Blogger Ian G. said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:28, Blogger Ian G. said...

The government should be jumping at the chance [sic] they are innocent.

I'm assuming there's a missing "to prove" in there. Boy, I love the "guilty until proven innocent" standard of proof.

Hey, edwardianbeauty, how come you haven't let the FBI search your computer to prove you don't have child pornography on it? You should be jumping at the chance to prove you're innocent.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 06 January, 2011 15:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Well, let's use Brian Good and Andrew Bernstein's "standard of evidence," shall we?

It's obvious that edwardianbeauty is a child molester because Brian Good is a troofer.

See, wasn't that easy?

 
At 06 January, 2011 20:11, Blogger edwardianbeauty said...

Why am I a lunatic? Doubting the official story doesn't make me a lunatic. The government should care if millions of people think they were cause of 9/11. They should try to convince those people they didn't do it.

Why won't you debate the people if you know you are right?

Why do debunkers try to put "truthers" down by calling us crazy ormaking fun of us?

 
At 06 January, 2011 20:30, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Why am I a lunatic? Doubting the official story doesn't make me a lunatic.

In all fairness, that's probably true. You write like more like a gullible, naive kid than a true lunatic.

The government should care if millions of people think they were cause of 9/11. They should try to convince those people they didn't do it.

The 9/11 Commission Report and NIST's report on WTC7 are generally accepted as accurate. There is no material opposition to the findings of those two reports.

Why won't you debate the people if you know you are right?

A debate is appropriate where there are legitimate questions. Truthers do not raise or discuss legitimate questions; instead, they just throw out a lot of deceptive talk.

Why do debunkers try to put "truthers" down by calling us crazy ormaking fun of us?

Because debunkers are intellectually superior to truthers.

 
At 06 January, 2011 22:30, Blogger paulthew said...

"That's all you need to do to convince me and other truthers"

We wish...man, we've been trying to do that for nearly ten years.

If reality will not convince you, what will?

As for Alex Jones, yup, photoshop does make him slimmer, calmer, and even, dare I say it, normal.

I bet he uses this image on his dating site.

 
At 06 January, 2011 23:47, Blogger edwardianbeauty said...

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september112009/911_truth_9-11-09.php

This is going to be my last point. Even the 9/11 commission is doubting the story.

 
At 07 January, 2011 00:16, Blogger paulthew said...

As I said, for 10 years you lot have been evading reality:

"But in the vast majority of cases, using Farmer's book in an attempt to support 9/11 truth claims is an exercise in cherry-picking at its most dishonest, because even a brief look at the text shows he does nothing of the kind."

Read it and weep.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/John_Farmer_and_the_Official_Version

 
At 07 January, 2011 00:18, Blogger paulthew said...

As I said, for 10 years you lot have been evading reality:

"But in the vast majority of cases, using Farmer's book in an attempt to support 9/11 truth claims is an exercise in cherry-picking at its most dishonest, because even a brief look at the text shows he does nothing of the kind."

Read it and weep.

Wrong, yet again. You lot are fuckinjg hopeless.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/John_Farmer_and_the_Official_Version

 
At 07 January, 2011 03:16, Blogger Garry said...

'If 9/11 was not an inside job why is it that the government refuses to be investigated by an independent organization? The government should be jumping at the chance they are innocent'.

Oh, and who gets to choose this 'independent' body? Morons like yourself?

'The government should care if millions of people think they were cause of 9/11'.

If 'millions' back your case, then how come you've achieved the square root of fuck-all since September 2001, and how come a troofer rally is lucky to get triple figures for attendance?

'Why won't you debate the people if you know you are right?'

There is no 'debate', and you do not represent 'the people'. If the latter proposition was true, Cynthia McKinney would be POTUS instead of Obama. This is like Holocaust denial. There is historical truth, and there is outright fantasy. Al-Qaeda did 9/11. Deal with it.

 
At 07 January, 2011 06:47, Blogger Ian G. said...

Why am I a lunatic?

Because you believe insane things.

The government should care if millions of people think they were cause of 9/11.

This is true, as it indicates that millions of people have no idea how to think critically. It's an indictment of our education system.

They should try to convince those people they didn't do it.

And you should try to convince us that you're not a pedophile.

Why won't you debate the people if you know you are right?

There have been a million debates between sane people and truthers....and then truthers come back with the same nonsense again: "free-fall speed" "fire can't melt steel" "set up to fail" "bin Laden isn't wanted for 9/11".

After a while, there's no point to debating. All that's left to do is mock.

Why do debunkers try to put "truthers" down by calling us crazy ormaking fun of us?

Because it's fun.

 
At 07 January, 2011 08:32, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

You know what you need to do? You need to debate the webmaster of debunking the debunkers and the youtube channel I posted. That's all you need to do to convince me and other truthers.

Got news for you, If you want to be taken seriously you need real hard evidence, not questions from ignorance. And nothing is proved by debating some loony on YouTube, we will do it for kicks sometimes. The fact you think this Dude on YouTube and some other Dude who has a web site are authorities on anything but kook ideas shows how gullible you are.

Fact is no one cares what the lunatic fringe care about, some think we never landed on the Moon, some think jet spew mind altering drugs and on and on. Truthers are just one of the loony groups in the world. And as people they hold no power or influence over the thinking world, so who cares.

 
At 07 January, 2011 08:36, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

This is going to be my last point. Even the 9/11 commission is doubting the story.

So you are asking us to debate all these other, but you yourself don't have the courage to prove your case here? Maybe it is because you have nothing.

 
At 07 January, 2011 08:40, Blogger Triterope said...

Why am I a lunatic? Doubting the official story doesn't make me a lunatic.

Maybe at some point in the past that was true. But in 2011, the only people doubting the "official story" are lifelong conspiracy nuts, the mentally ill, and those who prey on both groups.

The government should care if millions of people think they were cause of 9/11.

Yes, they should. But since there aren't millions of people who think that, and real-world 9-11 Truth events can't muster more than a few dozen people, no government is going to waste their time with you.

And the ones who do believe in a 9-11 conspiracy, have you taken a good look at these people? This thread is a wonderful example of how Truthers refuse to even look at anything that refutes their silly theories, and will make up anything they want to cling to them. Do you want to be another snug.bug? (HINT: You don't.)

Why won't you debate the people if you know you are right?

We've all been debating people for years. All you people have to bring is the same old tired points. Everything you've posted here is ancient as Truther memes go.

Why do debunkers try to put "truthers" down by calling us crazy or making fun of us?

Because "truthers" are a stupid joke, and the only value they have left is to see what sort of hilarious comments we can twist them into making, simply by asking them to defend their position.

 
At 07 January, 2011 09:40, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

And fat Pat the lumbering coward continues to SHUT THE FUCK UP about both his asinine pseudoscientific claims and the contradictory BS of his fellow dumbasses. What a punk asshole.

"We have all the forensic evidence!" -James Bennett

What does that bullshit even mean, James? Who's "we"?

"History is about building a narrative" (whether it fits the evidence or not) -James Bennett

 
At 07 January, 2011 09:45, Blogger TroyFromWV said...

Pat Cowardly...

GET A LIFE!

 
At 07 January, 2011 09:59, Blogger Ian G. said...

And fat Pat the lumbering coward continues to SHUT THE FUCK UP about both his asinine pseudoscientific claims and the contradictory BS of his fellow dumbasses. What a punk asshole.

Still haven't gotten laid yet, huh?

 
At 07 January, 2011 10:22, Blogger Garry said...

'Still haven't gotten laid yet, huh?'

Actually, he has ...

'Cosmos' walks into a bar, and orders six tequilas. The barman asks 'Are you celebrating?'

'Yeah', 'Cosmos' replies, 'My first blowjob'.

'Oh that's great, pal', says the barman, 'have another on me'.

'No thanks. If six shots of cuervo won't take the aftertaste away, then nothing will'

 
At 07 January, 2011 10:42, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"GET A LIFE!"
-ToyFromPatsVagina

"Fuck America"
-ToyFromPatsVagina

"Troy is my buddy..."
-Pat the Insipid Lipid.

Troy Sexton, the only person who might literally shit on a 9/11 victim's grave. Pat is continually impressed by you.

 
At 07 January, 2011 10:55, Blogger Bill said...

edwardianbeauty said...
"You know what you need to do? You need to debate the webmaster of debunking the debunkers and the youtube channel I posted. That's all you need to do to convince me and other truthers."

translation: RETREAT!!!!

"why is it that the government refuses to be investigated by an independent organization?"

Because the US govt is not beholden to the beliefs a fringe cult occupied by snake oil peddlers, and fools.

"This is going to be my last point. "

Translation: I will run away now because this next post will most likely be like the others and prove my sheer gullibility and incompetency.

 
At 07 January, 2011 11:28, Blogger Triterope said...

And fat Pat the lumbering coward continues to SHUT THE FUCK UP about both his asinine pseudoscientific claims and the contradictory BS of his fellow dumbasses. What a punk asshole.

You see, edwardian, this is exactly what I was talking about.

Multiple posters attempted to address the above poster's claims in this thread -- the very last thread before this one. This noble truthseeker's reponse was to abandon the thread, and post the same garbage in this thread.

Mind you, at no point does he explain why those answers were wrong, or even acknowledge that the attempt was made. Which is not only dishonest, but rude.

This has been going on for months. This pathetic loser will continue to ask the same questions, and ignore any answers, until the end of time. Or until Pat and James ban his ass from this blog, at which time he'll scream "Censorship!"

Never mind that the conclusion he's angling for -- that the World Center Towers were secretly destroyed by thermite -- is laughable. Another batch of Truthers couldn't cut a hollow tube with 75 pounds of the stuff. Real implosion experts involved at the scene failed to note any telltale residue. Never mind the logistical problems in secretly applying a huge quantity of explosive to a building. (Hopefully Brian "snug.bug" Good will be along soon to explain that away.)

This is all a perfect example of how 9-11 Truthers are not interested in answers. Their goal is to keep asking the same old questions over and over and over, so they can keep selling books, or raising money, or fulfilling other needs.

Is this the intellectual company you want to keep?

 
At 07 January, 2011 11:28, Blogger Triterope said...

And fat Pat the lumbering coward continues to SHUT THE FUCK UP about both his asinine pseudoscientific claims and the contradictory BS of his fellow dumbasses. What a punk asshole.

You see, edwardian, this is exactly what I was talking about.

Multiple posters attempted to address the above poster's claims in this thread -- the very last thread before this one. This noble truthseeker's reponse was to abandon the thread, and post the same garbage in this thread.

Mind you, at no point does he explain why those answers were wrong, or even acknowledge that the attempt was made. Which is not only dishonest, but rude.

This has been going on for months. This pathetic loser will continue to ask the same questions, and ignore any answers, until the end of time. Or until Pat and James ban his ass from this blog, at which time he'll scream "Censorship!"

Never mind that the conclusion he's angling for -- that the World Center Towers were secretly destroyed by thermite -- is laughable. Another batch of Truthers couldn't cut a hollow tube with 75 pounds of the stuff. Real implosion experts involved at the scene failed to note any telltale residue. Never mind the logistical problems in secretly applying a huge quantity of explosive to a building. (Hopefully Brian "snug.bug" Good will be along soon to explain that away.)

This is all a perfect example of how 9-11 Truthers are not interested in answers. Their goal is to keep asking the same old questions over and over and over, so they can keep selling books, or raising money, or fulfilling other needs.

Is this the intellectual company you want to keep?

 
At 07 January, 2011 11:31, Blogger Triterope said...

And fat Pat the lumbering coward continues to SHUT THE FUCK UP about both his asinine pseudoscientific claims and the contradictory BS of his fellow dumbasses. What a punk asshole.

You see, edwardian, this is exactly what I was talking about.

Multiple posters attempted to address the above poster's claims in this thread -- the very last thread before this one. This noble truthseeker's reponse was to abandon the thread, and post the same garbage in this thread. This has been going on for months.

Mind you, at no point does he explain why those answers were wrong, or even acknowledge that the attempt was made. Which is not only dishonest, but rude.

Never mind that the conclusion he's angling for -- that the World Center Towers were secretly destroyed by thermite -- is laughable. Another batch of Truthers couldn't cut a hollow tube with 75 pounds of the stuff. Real implosion experts involved at the scene failed to note any telltale residue. Never mind the logistical problems in secretly applying a huge quantity of explosive to a building. (Hopefully Brian "snug.bug" Good will be along soon to explain that away.)

This is all a perfect example of how 9-11 Truthers are not interested in answers. Their goal is to keep asking the same old questions over and over and over, so they can keep selling books, or raising money, or fulfilling other needs.

Is this the intellectual company you want to keep?

 
At 07 January, 2011 12:15, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Edwardianbeauty:

Why did the Titanic sink?

A: Iceberg

or

B: Explosives

Pick one!

 
At 07 January, 2011 14:37, Blogger Garry said...

'Troy Sexton, the only person who might literally shit on a 9/11 victim's grave'.

Says the man who posed as the relative of a 9/11 victim.

Scum.

 
At 07 January, 2011 18:59, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Troy Sexton, the only person who might literally shit on a 9/11 victim's grave."

No, that'd be the truthers.

 
At 07 January, 2011 21:43, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

Truthers shit on 9/11 victims (dead or alive) every time they open their suckholes.

"We're just asking questions" they'll say, which is horseshit because they don't want answers. They've already made up their minds.

Brian hides behind the old "The 9/11 widows deserve answers" lie. Their two hundred some-odd questions fall into two catagories: Questions that have been answered and questions that have nothing to do with the attacks at all.Has he ever spoken directly with his Congress person? Did he call Nancy Pelosi's office while she was speaker of the house? How about Henry (I will investigate any stupid conspiracy that comes along) Waxman? Nope. When Brian isn't running around in his Guy Fawkes mask he's sniffing the plastic balls at Chucky Cheese.

Yet we (the normal people) must prove our case to them and dill-holes like them? In what fucking universe does that even make sense.

The reason I'm here is because I don't want this 9/11 Conspiracy bullshit to linger long enough to make it into historical picture. It's bad enough I had to sit through fifteen minutes of JFK conspiracy denials in my college history class, or that I have to deal with some dipshit asshole who thinks we faked the moonlandings. If there had been a Loose Change around in 1964 we could have put the Grassy Knoll bullshit to rest long ago.

However busting troofer ass will have to do.

Cosmos comes in here to smear Pat because Cosmos is a pathetic loser who posed as a family member of one of the passengers of United 93. This shows both an incredible ego matched with incredible stupidity because anybody with a fifth grade education would know that his identity could easily be varified. So all he has left is his iron spheres, which nobody cares about because they mean nothing. Has Cosmos talked to the NYFD or NYPD investigators about his theory? I've never met him but I doubt it. Not that it would require a spine either, if I lived in NYC and I had serious questions I would make a point to have a brief converstation with those people who can actually answer my questions. Instead Cosmos makes allegations without following through on them.

 
At 08 January, 2011 07:37, Blogger Garry said...

M Greg Ferris - well put.

There's one other thing that's worth adding. If you're talking to a non-troofer, and he/she comes out with stuff along the lines of 'Why did WTC7 collapse?' or 'I heard the FBI haven't indicted bin Laden', you can put them right, explain the facts to them, show them the evidence, and they'll respond with something along the lines of 'Oh I see. I got it completely wrong'.

Try the same with a troofer, and see where that gets you. You might as well reason with a barnyard animal, for all the good that would do.

 
At 08 January, 2011 10:56, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Truthers are like brick walls!

In Jerusalem, an English female journalist heard about an old rabbi who visited the Wailing Wall to pray, twice a day, everyday, for a long, long time.

In an effort to check out the story, she goes to the holy site and there he is!

She watches the bearded old man at prayer–and after about 45 minutes, when he turns to leave, she approaches him for an interview.

Im Jane Collins from the BBC, sir, how long have you been coming to the Wailing Wall and praying? For about 50 years, he informs her.

50 years! Thats amazing! What do you pray for?

I pray for peace between the Jews and the Arabs. I pray for all the hatred to stop and I pray for all our children to grow up in safety and friendship.

And how do you feel, sir, after doing this for 50 years?

Like Im talking to a brick wall.

 
At 08 January, 2011 21:20, Blogger Jaye said...

I wonder if Alex Jones will mention me owning his ass on his own show in his new app?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home