Tuesday, December 06, 2011

Occupy Wall Street Protestor Who Got A Job On Wall Street...

Is a crackpot 9-11 Truther. Tracy Postert's story of going from Zuccotti Park to Wall Street analyst is the kind of tale newspapers love:
Down-on-her-luck protester Tracy Postert spent 15 days washing sidewalks and making sandwiches at Zuccotti Park — then landed a dream job at a Financial District investment firm thanks to a high-powered passer-by who offered her work. “I never thought I would be doing this,’’ Postert admitted to The Post. The Upper West Sider, who has a Ph.D. in biomedical science specializing in pharmacology, was unemployed and had all but given up on finding work in her preferred field of academia when she joined the movement in October.
Coverage has been split, with some people denouncing her for betraying the cause and going over to the enemy, while others are seeing it as a vindication of capitalism. I also noticed that several have wondered why a person with a doctorate in the biomedical field would have a tough time finding a job. Might it indicate that she has other issues?

Indeed, it might. Turns out Tracy Postert is a 9-11 Truther. And not just any ordinary Truther, but a space ray dustified the towers Judy Woods nutbar. Here's a video she put together:
BTW, on the smell part, Tracy likes to call herself a "nosewitness", get it? Here's some back and forth between Tracy and Uncle Fetzer (Postert's words in italics):
To my astonishment, in rereading this latest post from Tracy Postert, who is a teacher in a public school of the New York Department of Education, I discovered a paragraph that I had overlooked in drafting my reply. Here this utterly despicable person reiterates false, baseless, and disgusting allegations that I am an alcoholic and that I have abused my daughter:

Savage? Get real. I haven't savaged anyone. I made fun of you. I danced when I got proved 100%+ correct by your admissions. That doesn't qualify as "savage". Spreading rumors about your alcoholism and past as a child molester were a bit stronger, but AT LEAST I GOT THE RIGHT PERSON! You accused me of faking my identity, etc. Besides, if you abuse alcohol, you should expect to have that follow you around forever, because it does speak to your mentality and self control. Molesting your daughter, if true, was unforgiveable.

I am a former Marine Corps officer who is both a moderate drinker and would never molest anyone. My daughter--who is married and pregnant with her second child--is the joy of my life. Someone who would spread such malicious and unfounded claims is despicable and has no place in the public school systems of this country. I have reported her to the Department of Education of the City of New York--and not for the first time! I hope it will result in action. This grotesque behavior by a close associate of Judy Wood and John Hutchison raises the most serious questions of moral responsibility. Judy Wood has met my daughter. My wife has looked after her cats. I have never made any argument about her that could be compared to the exhibition of moral decadence displayed here by Tracy Postert. If Judy Wood has a fiber of moral decency in her body, then she can demonstrate it by denouncing this extreme and despicable conduct by Tracy Postert. Otherwise, Judy will impugn herself by her silence.

Are there no bounds to the corruption of the members of this cult?
We'll see if Postert can keep her job long; the craze is obviously strong with her.

And Postert (maiden name Blevins) is also another poster child for the Willie Nelson Theory:
Medical Marijuana Barbie is a character created by Tracy Blevins, comptroller for New York's Medical Marijuana Party, and is the star attraction of Blevins' one-woman "Medical Marijuana Traveling Circus Sideshow," designed to garner support for the legalization of medical pot.
Hat Tip: JREF forum member AW Smith.

63 Comments:

At 06 December, 2011 11:11, Blogger Ian said...

Hey Pat, how long did it take you to find that information in a Google search?

I'm just curious about who is going to take the fall for hiring her without vetting her once it becomes clear what a nutcase she is.

Maybe I should have tried her strategy. Sure, I only have an MBA and not a PhD, I also don't believe in death ray beams from space, holographic planes, and magic thermite elves.

 
At 06 December, 2011 11:17, Blogger Ian said...

Also, Brian, this is why nobody cares when you babble about all the architects and engineers that have signed Richard Gage's manifesto. Having an advanced degree does not inoculate one against a belief in crazy things. One could easily be a genius in one field and a crackpot in another, as Isaac Newton's dabbling in alchemy shows.

Of course, it's much funnier when the crazy person is a failed janitor like you.

 
At 06 December, 2011 11:48, Blogger Pat said...

Ian, most of the top Google results today are about her getting the job, but if you ignore those (since they wouldn't have been there three weeks ago), it's pretty obvious that her nuttery was not well-hidden. OTOH, they did get her for reportedly not much more than minimum wage, so there may not be much downside, provided they check her work carefully.

 
At 06 December, 2011 11:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Hold it, Pat!

I was under the apparently mistaken impression that Uncle Fetzer and Judy Woods are old friends--thicker than thieves, if you will.

So what happened to their relationship?

Did Uncle Fetzer's baggertarian idiotology (misspelling intentional) clash with Dr. "So ugly that we shaved her ass and forced her to walk backwards" nuttertarian idiotology?

Who knows? Perhaps Uncle Fetzer was doing the "moderate drinker" thing. As time progressed, of course, Dr. Woods started to look pretty good to Uncle Fetzer, so, in a fit of alcohol-induced "passion," he bum-rushed her, tackled her, slipped a bag over her head, and tried to boink the old hag?

(Whatever you do, folks, don't try to visualize that last paragraph. Some things are definitely trauma inducing, and this is no exception).

Isn't this why Brian "goat fucker" Good was kicked out of the "truth" movement? What is it with these people? And why is sex predation so prevalent among "respectable" troofers?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Don't you love troofer cat fights?

 
At 06 December, 2011 11:57, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Yikes. Anybody looking into her background had to have seen this.

 
At 06 December, 2011 12:08, Blogger Ian said...

Yikes. Anybody looking into her background had to have seen this.

Good to see she didn't have the common sense to kill her twitter feed or at very least stop babbling about thermite, now that she's employed.

How soon before the NY Post picks up on this? This is going to be a big headache for her employer.

 
At 06 December, 2011 12:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...I am a former Marine Corps officer who is both a moderate drinker and would never molest anyone. My daughter--who is married and pregnant with her second child--is the joy of my life." -- Uncle Fetzer.

So do the children refer to him as Grandpa Fetzer or Uncle Fetzer?

 
At 06 December, 2011 12:46, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

I think they're using her as a guinea pig so when they do expose her she'll be the laughingstock of the entire NonTruth Movement.

Can't wait to see the headlines for that:

"9/11 Truther exposed as a fraud. Truth Movement backs away and cowers in humiliation."

 
At 06 December, 2011 13:25, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

OMG!!! Its WTCDust from JREF!!!

 
At 06 December, 2011 15:43, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

If nothing else this explains why Wall Street is so fucked up...how can I get a job there?

 
At 06 December, 2011 17:01, Blogger scharfy said...

Watch that video from 3:40 on for some grade A nutbaggery!!!!


Holy fuck someone hired this loon???

 
At 06 December, 2011 17:18, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

This video sums it all up:

http://www.cracked.com/video_18352_a-conspiracy-theory-too-weird-even-internet.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=fanpage&utm_campaign=new+article&wa_ibsrc=fanpage

 
At 06 December, 2011 17:33, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

I watched the video (to test my ability to endure pain).

Directed energy weapons? Cool, name it, Doc. Explain how this weapon works. They've just got a powerful enough laser reduced to a size which fits in a 747, so if there's a second weapon 10 years older I'd like to see it.

I can play her stupid game too:

1. Not a single New York Yankee was at the WTC on 9/11. Coincidence?

2. Why didn't the smoke detectors put out the fires?

3. Does the white smoke indicate Papal action? You know the answer to this one already.

4. Would the towers stood had the Port Authority put decorative anti-slip pads at the base of the "Bath Tub"?

I'm pretty sure these questions will go unanswered...because they're just as stupid as the other unanswered questions...

 
At 07 December, 2011 09:35, Blogger Admin said...

For lots of funny and amazing stuff...please visit... www.KisKut.com

 
At 08 December, 2011 02:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Question: If ignorance is bliss, why does the goat fucker take Paxil?

 
At 08 December, 2011 18:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

Pssst! It thinks it's clever! Let's not spoil the fun by saying anything different, eh?

 
At 09 December, 2011 08:35, Blogger Ian said...

Pssst! It thinks it's clever! Let's not spoil the fun by saying anything different, eh?

petgoat is using "it" again to describe a person. Once again, petgoat resembles "Buffalo Bill" from "The Silence of the Lambs". He wears women's underwear, he refers to people as "it", he stalks women, he's obsessed with a man who rejected him (Willie R.)

I wonder if any overweight women have gone missing in the Bay Area recently? If so, I've got a good tip for the FBI.

 
At 09 December, 2011 11:24, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

If so, I've got a good tip for the FBI. -Ianside No Job

Why don't you work on your resume instead? You don't want to be a jobless laid-off loser forever...or maybe you do.

 
At 09 December, 2011 12:33, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Why don't you work on your resume instead? You don't want to be a jobless laid-off loser forever...

Continuing our discussion of Truthers at work: apparently, ScootleRoyale of Debunking the Debunkers -- scientific genius and revolutionary hero -- is employed here.

 
At 09 December, 2011 12:37, Blogger Ian said...

Why don't you work on your resume instead? You don't want to be a jobless laid-off loser forever...or maybe you do.

This is funny coming from a truther.

Hey, it's been more than 10 years since 9/11 and the truth movement has accomplished nothing, but hey, at least he can still flame people on the internet!

Another word of advice: women tend not to be too into guys who just post idiocy on the internet all day. If you ever want to lose your virginity, the beard and the black shirts have to go, but so does the internet spam.

 
At 09 December, 2011 12:50, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"Another word of advice: women tend not to be too into guys who just post idiocy on the internet all day."

And Ian knows this from years of experience, and by getting laid off for spamming SLC all day. Good work leading by example, Ian, but you should've done some actual work at your former job, son.

 
At 09 December, 2011 13:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yeah, no doubt about it, ArseHooligan.

After all, everyone knows that your GED trumps Ian's undergraduate degree and MBA.

 
At 09 December, 2011 13:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, it's pretty obvious that Ian's education was wasted on him.

 
At 09 December, 2011 13:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 09 December, 2011 13:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 09 December, 2011 13:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yeah, that means a lot coming from a college dropout, science illiterate and self-admitted cretin who got an F in freshman Economics.

How many courses in Economics do you think Ian passed with a minimum B+ grade or better in order to qualify for the MBA program?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
At 09 December, 2011 13:24, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

How many courses in Economics do you think Ian passed with a minimum B+ grade or better in order to qualify for the MBA program?

It's interesting how Troofers seem to tend toward the extremes in education. They're either lifelong nothings or lifelong academics.

 
At 09 December, 2011 14:17, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

RGT, Pat the researcher wants you to show your sources for your expertise on truthers, so he can cite them in future posts.

How do you know that they tend toward educational extremes? Is it because you can't find any counterexamples, or because you can't help making up bullshit out of thin air?

 
At 09 December, 2011 14:21, Blogger Ian said...

It's interesting how Troofers seem to tend toward the extremes in education. They're either lifelong nothings or lifelong academics.

Interesting observation. I'm guessing that this is true for different reasons. For people like David Ray Griffin (theology) and Jim Fetzer (philosophy), it's probably the possibility of getting so wrapped up in the metaphysical that you lose touch with the physical. Even Steve Jones, an academic in the hard sciences, seems to be more of a theologian at this point.

And of course for Pat Cowardly and Brian Good, it's a combination of ignorance and anger at a world that laughs at them. Just look those two geniuses in this thread. 9/11 truth isn't important, but getting back at me for mocking them is.

 
At 09 December, 2011 14:23, Blogger Ian said...

Bill Maher once said that what Islamic fundamentalists really need is to get laid. That's definitely true of winners like Brian Good and Pat Cowardly.

 
At 09 December, 2011 14:42, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

So what's your advice for Pat, who hasn't ever been laid in his life? Why do you think he fetishizes muscle-bound fictional characters who wear skin-tight outfits?

 
At 09 December, 2011 14:46, Blogger Ian said...

So what's your advice for Pat, who hasn't ever been laid in his life? Why do you think he fetishizes muscle-bound fictional characters who wear skin-tight outfits?

Hmm, maybe giving you advice on how to pick up women isn't the right approach, given your apparent obsession with muscle-bound men.

Anyway, this blog is not for homosexual men looking for sugar daddies, it's for talking about 9/11 truth. Is there anything you can add to that discussion that hasn't been brought up a billion times before in the last 10 years?

 
At 09 December, 2011 14:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yeah, I guess that explains why the ArseHooligan's one-and-only [cough] "girlfriend" had a perpetual five o'clock shadow.

 
At 09 December, 2011 15:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Ian wrote, "...If so, I've got a good tip for the FBI."

Speaking of tips, didn't the goat fucker use a similar line on Willie Rodriguez?

"...Aw, come on Willie. I'll only stick the tip in. Trust me!"

 
At 09 December, 2011 15:24, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

RGT, Pat the researcher wants you to show your sources for your expertise on truthers, so he can cite them in future posts.

Why evidence do you have that Pat cares about that?

 
At 09 December, 2011 16:26, OpenID veglov.com said...

How can I get a job on wall street?

 
At 11 December, 2011 09:45, Blogger snug.bug said...

That depends on what kind of position you're seeking. It's very important to show that you're the right kind of guy. At one level it's important to show that you're hard-working, goal-oriented, driven by your money urges, that you have developable social and diplomatic skills, that you take time for physical and emotional grooming, and that you will deal fairly and honestly with people on your team while looking away when outsiders are treated unfairly and dishonestly.

At another level (Ian's level) the right kind of guy will have rudimentary technical skills, will be generally oblivious to what's going on around him, will be easily manipulated, will have a great tolerance for tedium, little imagination, will have very low self-esteem, will maintain an unrealistic idea of the importance of his work, will be willing to work very hard for cheap, and is willing to do just about anything he's asked, no matter how menial or unethical.

 
At 12 December, 2011 05:44, Blogger Ian said...

Boy, it's funny when a failed janitor who lives with his parents gives career advice.

You should give dating advice too, petgoat, given that your courting of Willie Rodriguez was about as successful as your career as a janitor (or as successful as your attempts to get the widows questions answered).

 
At 12 December, 2011 05:46, Blogger Ian said...

petgoat should also give grooming advice. I mean, it must be tough keeping up the appearance of a homeless lunatic when one comes from one of the wealthiest communities in the US.

http://911scholars.ning.com/profile/BrianGood

 
At 12 December, 2011 09:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Ian,

That's not "career advise," that's a cut-and-paste from his cover letter.

 
At 12 December, 2011 10:05, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

the right kind of guy - Brian

You aren't that type of guy, sorry but Carol Brouillet you weren't and that you're a disgusting pig who stalks her on a daily basis.

 
At 12 December, 2011 13:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

TAW you're a liar

 
At 12 December, 2011 13:44, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"provided they check her work carefully." -Pat Curley: Aging, Obese Liar.

Do you check your work carefully, Pat? When you said the microspheres 'could easily' have been caused by torches, and then retracted it in humiliation, why didn't you check your work? Where did the 'easily' come from? Whose "work" were you parroting (not 'checking') when you said that, and why did you never provide a source?

Why are you so afraid to talk about the facts? What do you think we find when we check YOUR "work" carefully?

 
At 12 December, 2011 14:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Who are you to lecture anyone about the integrity of their work?

After all, you've lied repeatedly about the contents of the RJ Lee Report, and when confronted or challenged to produce direct quotes from the RJ Lee Report you run away with your tail between your spindly legs.

In fact, you're such a compulsive lair that you've repeatedly tried to pass off iron-rich microspheres as elemental iron.

Remember ArseHooligan, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

 
At 12 December, 2011 14:27, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

When you said the microspheres 'could easily' have been caused by torches, and then retracted it in humiliation, why didn't you check your work?

The microspheres aren't important. Accept it.

BTW do you like my new profile photo? I'm wondering where I can get one of those sweet thermite shirts.

 
At 12 December, 2011 15:50, Blogger Ian said...

TAW you're a liar

Who do you think you're kidding, petgoat? Everyone knows you're a disgusting pervert who was thrown out of Richard Gage's group for using Gage's computers to harass Carol Brouillet.

 
At 12 December, 2011 16:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you're a liar.

 
At 12 December, 2011 16:32, Blogger Ian said...

See what I mean?

Anyway, petgoat, none of this is important. What is important is that the widows haven't gotten their questions answered, there have been no new investigations, and your "meatball on a fork" model hasn't been published.

 
At 12 December, 2011 17:10, Blogger Mike Rosefierce said...

I'm wondering where I can get one of those sweet thermite shirts.

I don't know where to get the shirt with the Harrit figures, but I found some pretty nice alternatives:

#1, #2, #3

Last, and least, Pat Cowardly modeling his Friday shirt.

 
At 13 December, 2011 07:33, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

TAW you're a liar

Where's your evidence to prove that I am a "liar", asshole?

You have a day to produce the evidence or you're the liar.

 
At 13 December, 2011 07:38, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

I've recently talked with Carol Brouillet, she told me how Brian Good would stalk her at every meeting that she went too. Asking her to leave her husband for him, she refused and how Brian felt rejected when she told him "No". Then he constantly harassed her e-mail address day in and day out pestering her to the point where Carol told him to fuck off and to get away from her.

Just reading what she described says alot about Brian's behavior.

 
At 13 December, 2011 08:42, Blogger snug.bug said...

TAW, you're a liar. I can't prove something didn't happen. You have to prove it did. I would never have asked Carol to break up her family. I considered it one of her greatest assets as a candidate and an activist. She had three teenaged sons and it would have been very hurtful to them.

I sent Carol a lot of emails during a
period when I was trying to convince her that some of her friends were bigots and/or con artists who were bad for the reputation of the truth movement and bad for her reputation personally, and that she was making a big mistake in defending them. And I was right about that.

 
At 13 December, 2011 08:46, Blogger Ian said...

Among the many things that are so funny about Brian is that he is not just a liar, but a pathetically bad liar. He lies about things that have already been proven, in some cases by Brian himself.

So he denies being "petgoat" and "punxsutawneybarney" even though he posted at this very blog as one and took credit at this very blog for being the other.

He denies stalking Carol Brouillet even though Carol Brouillet says he stalked her.

He denies running away squealing and crying from a debate challenge from Willie Rodriguez even though Rodriguez challenged him at this very blog and Brian had previously said he would debate Rodriguez "any time, any place".

 
At 13 December, 2011 08:52, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

TAW, you're a liar. I can't prove something didn't happen.

Double negative speech, wow!

You have to prove it did. I would never have asked Carol to break up her family.

So, you DID ask her to break it off with her husband. Proof is in your writting.

She had three teenaged sons and it would have been very hurtful to them.

You mean her husband, don't you? Plus they're not your sons, they're Carols and her husbands.

I sent Carol a lot of emails during a period when I was trying to convince her....

To leave her husband and run off with you, you mean?

that she was making a big mistake in defending them. And I was right about that.

She made no big mistake. You harassed her with threatening e-mails, you stalked her at every chance you got. It's utterly your fault that you pushed Carol away as a friend.

 
At 13 December, 2011 08:54, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

Ian,

So basically Brian Good is just a big pussy who can't admit that he's wrong when he knows that he's wrong.

Gotcha!

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:06, Blogger Ian said...

So basically Brian Good is just a big pussy who can't admit that he's wrong when he knows that he's wrong.

It's part of his mental illness. You don't end up unemployed and living with your parents when pushing 60 unless you've got serious psychiatric problems.

Brian is a pathological liar.

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you make stuff up and you're not very good at it. Maybe that's why you got fired on wall street--not because you make stuff up, but because you suck at it.

Carol Brouillet never said I stalked her. You're a liar.

Years ago I may have said I would debate Rodriguez "any time, any place". If so, that would have been before I found about Willie's intimate relations with JREF, which relations disqualify SLC as a neutral debate host. Willie's lack of interest in pursuing alternate venues shows the bad faith of his offer.

I never asked Carol to break it off with her husband. I considered her stable marriage of 20 years to be one of her greatest assets as an activist and as a candidate.

Carol made big mistakes. Her support of the liar and bigot Kevin Barrett split the Bay Area truth movement, and cost her so much credibility in the activist community that she greatly curtailed her public activities and gave up political election campaigns.

You're making up lies. The reason you clowns do it is because you can't defend your laughable notions about 9/11 and you think that if you change the subject to lies about me that you can intimidate me.

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:19, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, where do you get the idea that I'm unemployed? Did Kevin Barrett tell you that?

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:24, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

Carol Brouillet never said I stalked her. You're a liar.

I talked with her yesterday on the phone. When I brought up about you on SLC she said: "That son of a bitch was stalking me."

I never asked Carol to break it off with her husband.

So you're calling Carol a liar? Want me to call her up and tell her that you said that about her??

Her support of the liar and bigot Kevin Barrett....

According to Carol, she said that you thought that her and Kevin had something going on. She said that you put your big nose where it should'nt have been and that Kevin was her friend and not her boyfriend. You took off in a jealous rage and vowed that you'd make Kevin pay.

The reason you clowns do it is because you can't defend your laughable notions about 9/11 and you think that if you change the subject to lies about me that you can intimidate me.

Actually, intimidating you is just what we're really good at and you've proven that time and again with every post you make. We didn't paint that targe on your back, you did that yourself you assclown.

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:26, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

Brian is a pathological liar.

And a psychological liar too. ;-)

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:33, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

From Carol Brouillet's own words about Brian:

"You have a crush on me and erroneously hold delusions about me. You are being irrationally jealous of Kevin and William. You cannot accept the fact that I am happily married and refuse to allow you to TRY to cause trouble between my husband and I. Because of your delusions, I cannot ever feel "safe" in your presence alone, and would rather not see you
again, but you are so desperate for attention that you are doing
extremely negative, destructive things- attacking me and respected
members of the 9/11 Truth Movement to force me to pay attention to
you."


That does look like stalking to me Brian. You can deny it all you like but what you've done to Carol is criminal and wrong.

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:48, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you make stuff up and you're not very good at it. Maybe that's why you got fired on wall street--not because you make stuff up, but because you suck at it.

Squeal squeal squeal!

What makes you think I got fired from Wall Street? Did Willir Rodriguez tell you that?

Carol Brouillet never said I stalked her. You're a liar.

False.

Years ago I may have said I would debate Rodriguez "any time, any place". If so, that would have been before I found about Willie's intimate relations with JREF, which relations disqualify SLC as a neutral debate host. Willie's lack of interest in pursuing alternate venues shows the bad faith of his offer.

Thanks for proving my point. You're a liar who ran away squealing and crying from a debate challenge from Willie Rodriguez.

 
At 13 December, 2011 09:53, Blogger Ian said...

I never asked Carol to break it off with her husband. I considered her stable marriage of 20 years to be one of her greatest assets as an activist and as a candidate.

False.

Carol made big mistakes. Her support of the liar and bigot Kevin Barrett split the Bay Area truth movement, and cost her so much credibility in the activist community that she greatly curtailed her public activities and gave up political election campaigns.

Nobody cares about what goes on inside the truth movement. I will note, however, that you were expelled from the movement, so her credibility would more likely be damaged from associating with you than with Barrett.

You're making up lies. The reason you clowns do it is because you can't defend your laughable notions about 9/11 and you think that if you change the subject to lies about me that you can intimidate me.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Brian, we're not trying to intimidate you. I want you to keep posting your deranged beliefs about what happened on 9/11 because they're hilarious.

I mean, you're completely harmless. 10 years after the fact, you still can't get a new investigation, you can't get the widows questions answered, you can't get meatball on a fork published in a journal.

Instead you just spend all your time babbling on this blog (since we're one of the few that hasn't banned you). Since there's nothing left to discuss about 9/11, what are we supposed to do but mock you for your lunatic obsessions?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home