Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Ben Swann Drinks the Kook-Aid

Never heard of this guy before, but surfing over to his website, I see he's kind of a kinder, gentler Alex Jones.  Lots of fear-mongering about Agenda 21, the Federal Reserve, Obama's gonna take your guns, etc.  He announced last week that he was going to "take on" the Rethink 9-11 Campaign, Richard Gage's latest effort to reanimate the corpse of 9-11 Troof.

I had little hope for this to begin with; about the best that could be anticipated was that he would yammer something about how the Truthers were distracting people from the very real dangers we face because (insert alternate paranoid fantasy here).

Instead, he took on the task of sucking up big-time to the Truthers, repeating every talking point from Gage and the others like a trained parrot.

Rethink 911 is the first ever global 9/11 anniversary campaign. Sponsored by a coalition of more than 40 organizations, ReThink911 is placing ads in 11 major cities around the world this September 2013.
But what is there to rethink? According to a group called Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, you need to start by rethinking the third building that fell that day.
And it goes downhill from there.  Tony Zamboni gives the usual bs about how no building in history every came down that way that wasn't a controlled demolition, and works in his usual spiel about the missing jolt.  Bob McIlvaine repeats his bizarre claim that his son died before the planes hit:

I can say with confidence that Bobbie died, and I can say with confidence before the planes hit.   So the point is, the planes had nothing to do with his death and I could prove that in a court of law pretty easily.
And they've got a new poll!
According to that poll, 38% of Americans have doubts about the official account of 9/11 and 10% do not believe it at all.  That is compared to only a minority of those polled, 40% who are completely satisfied.
Well, that's giving a very generous reading to the actual poll results (PDF file)

40% I am completely satisfied with the government’s account
38% I have some doubts as to whether the government’s account fully explains
everything
10% I do not believe the government’s account at all
12% I don’t know/ Not sure
Some doubts as to whether the government's account fully explains everything? That's not tinfoil hat territory by any means; I might even go along with that statement.  They want you to lump the 38% who are reasonably skeptical that everything has been disclosed, with the 10% who are nutters.  I'd say that the 38% should go with the 40%; call them people who are generally satisfied with the government's explanation, but may have minor doubts about some of the details.


177 Comments:

At 10 September, 2013 15:53, Blogger Ian said...

Some doubts as to whether the government's account fully explains everything? That's not tinfoil hat territory by any means; I might even go along with that statement.

Me too. I imagine there's at least been a bit of ass-covering about who missed what sign that the attacks were going to happen. That's the way bureaucracy handles massive fuck-ups.

So yeah, by that poll, I'm included among truthers.

 
At 10 September, 2013 15:56, Blogger Ian said...

And speaking of massive fuck-ups, there's this bit of genius from our resident unemployed lunatic from the previous thread that I couldn't let pass without pointing and laughing:

Ian, if the buildings fell because the planes hit them, they would have fallen immediately, not an hour later. If they fell from gravity, they would have fallen the first time they were hit by a strong wind.

All I can say is that there's a reason we ask for experts to handle inquiries into 9/11, and not unemployed janitors with serious mental illness.

 
At 10 September, 2013 17:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Ian wrote, "...And speaking of massive fuck-ups, there's this bit of genius from our resident unemployed lunatic from the previous thread that I couldn't let pass without pointing and laughing:"

Yeah, I noticed that little gem, too. And what does shit-for-brains offer to substantiate his idiotic assertion? Nothing whatsoever. After all, if Lyin' Brian Good said it, it must be true.

 
At 10 September, 2013 20:55, Blogger snug.bug said...

What's idiotic about it? NIST denies that the impact damage caused the towers to fall. NIST doesn't claim that gravity caused the collapses.

If you clowns think you know better than NIST, then you should be calling for new investigations.

 
At 11 September, 2013 03:05, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The braying liar lies, "...What's idiotic about it?"

Consider the source, cretin.

The illiterate liar whines, "...If you clowns think you know better than NIST, then you should be calling for new investigations."

Yes, we should take an illiterate liar who can't conjugate a verb seriously.

So why do you refuse to do the calculations, liar? Are you afraid that the force the upper portions of the towers exerted on the lower floors will exceed the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor of the World Trade Center?

Of course you're scared to death to perform the calculations because you know that to do so will blow a hole a mile wide through your bullshit 9/11 conspiracy lies. FACT: The physics (as opposed to your 100% fact-free pseudo-science) proves that 9/11 conspiracy theories are a crock of BS.

You're a charlatan, fraud, and a liar.

 
At 11 September, 2013 04:57, Blogger Ian said...

What's idiotic about it? NIST denies that the impact damage caused the towers to fall. NIST doesn't claim that gravity caused the collapses.

If you clowns think you know better than NIST, then you should be calling for new investigations.


Squeal squeal squeal!

Poor Brian. It's 12 years since 9/11 and he STILL hasn't gotten a single one of Laurie Van Auken's answered.

Brian was sure that by now, he and Laurie would have a wonderful life together: living in Brian's parents' house, sniffing glue, and watching "Full House" reruns at 2 am. Instead, Brian is still as lonely and pathetic as ever.

Maybe if you put some effort into getting her questions answered, instead of spending all day posting squealspam here, she'd have fallen in love with you by now.

 
At 11 September, 2013 06:46, Blogger Pat said...

Hey, this is a guy who thought his buffoonish drawings of rakeonrake were going to be published in prestigious engineering journals.

 
At 11 September, 2013 08:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGale, why should I do calculations? You'll just lie about my results.

If the calculations blow a hole in anything, you do them and show how they do--Mr. "Applied Mathematics". Go ahead, knock yourself out.

NIST didn't do the calculations. We need an official report that does the calculations.

Ian, denying the ground of SLC to liars like you, teasing you into making a fool of yourself with the silly arguments you use, is working to help the widows get their questions answered.

And none of you clowns can name even one architect or engineer independent of professional ties to NIST who is willing to to stiock his neck out and express confidence in NIST's collapse sequence.

 
At 11 September, 2013 08:48, Blogger David Banner said...

NIST set the standards for new fire protection. What hasn't Brian got right in 12 yrs? Absolutely nothing!

 
At 11 September, 2013 12:19, Blogger David Banner said...

Description of Brian in full detail:

One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers.

A foolish or stupid person; a blockhead.

Marked by inferiority to an expected standard of familiarity with language and literature.

A thoroughly contemptible, detestable person.

A person considered to be foolish or socially inept.

A conceited, boastful person.

If Brian had any brains he'd figure out which words match those definitions. But we all know Brian can't research because he's "Something regarded as necessary to the carrying out of one's occupation or profession."

Come on Brian, play the word game.

 
At 11 September, 2013 14:29, Blogger snug.bug said...

IOW, David Banner, who claimed he was an architect, has nothing to say about architecture or 9/11 and never did.

 
At 11 September, 2013 14:38, Blogger David Banner said...

I'd rather not risk my profession for a loser like you Brian. I'm here for shits and giggles and you're giving me both. Thanks for the enjoyment of me laughing at you though. I appreciate every moment we chatted.

Although you should be really pissed off at me for making you look a complete tool. I had you running around on Google looking up a fictional Marvel Comic charactor and you fell right into it. You are a true born sucker Brian. Stand up and take a bow. LMAO!

 
At 11 September, 2013 14:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The incompetent lying charlatan lies, "...ButtGale, why should I do calculations? You'll just lie about my results."

First, you can't do the calculations because you're a liar who flunked out of San Jose State University. Second, I can't lie about the results. Numbers don't lie, asshole.

You won't do the calculations because [1] you don't know enough math or physics to perform the calculations without making huge errors, and [2] you won't do the calculations because to do so will DESTROY YOUR IDIOTIC 9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

You fool NO ONE but yourself, liar.

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

The lying liar lies, "...If the calculations blow a hole in anything, you do them and show how they do--Mr. 'Applied Mathematics'. Go ahead, knock yourself out."

I've already performed the calculations, liar, and I know the CORRECT answers. You, on the other hand, are a liar who can't do elementary mathematics.

You claim you're smarter than me, so PROVE IT, liar.

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

The lying liar lies, "...NIST didn't do the calculations. We need an official report that does the calculations."

Do you ever stop lying, shit face?

NIST performed BILLIONS OF CALCULATIONS WHEN THEY RAN THE COLLAPSE SIMULATIONS -- YOU GODDAMNED MORON.

STOP TRYING TO BLAME NIST FOR INCOMPETENCE, LIAR. You won't perform the calculations because [1] you don't have the education, and [2] you're a liar who knows damned well that to perform the calculations will PROVE that you and the 9/11 "truth" movement are a CROCK OF SHIT.

You're a COWARD and a liar. You don't have a "scientific reputation" (your words), and I'd be surprised to discover that you have so much as a lowly GED.

You're a fraud and a charlatan.

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

 
At 11 September, 2013 14:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Get to work, loser. And show your work, liar.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Go for it, COWARD.

 
At 11 September, 2013 14:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...If you clowns think you know better than NIST, then you should be calling for new investigations." -- super idiot and compulsive liar, Brian Good, an ebonics speaking charlatan who can't conjugate a verb.

Should we expect this idiot to do the math? Not on your life.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

There's no reason for me to do the math. You'd just lie about it if I did.

If you want the math done, you'll have to do it yourself since NIST didn't do it.

Where do you get the idea that I flunked out of San Jose State?

NIST won't release their collapse calculations or their collapse simulations. Apparently the results were not to their liking.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying liar lies, "...There's no reason for me to do the math. You'd just lie about it if I did."

Repeating yourself and telling the same lies again, asshole? You have no evidence to show that I'll lie about anything. The only person who lies IS YOU. You won't do the calculations because you can't do them. "Scientific reputation" my ass. If you have a "scientific reputation" I'm the Easter bunny.

The incompetent lying charlatan lies, "...If you want the math done, you'll have to do it yourself since NIST didn't do it."

You didn't read my post, did you, idiot? I JUST TOLD YOU THAT I'VE ALREADY PERFORMED THE CALCULATIONS AND I KNOW THE CORRECT ANSWERS.

You won't do the calculations because [1] you're an incompetent liar who can't do elementary math, and [2] you're a liar who knows damned well that my calculations DESTROY YOUR IDIOTIC CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

The idiot whines, "...Where do you get the idea that I flunked out of San Jose State?"

Because you admitted to flunking out of SJSU. Not only that, you prove that you're a flunky every time you open your idiotic yap.

The lying liar lies, "...NIST won't release their collapse calculations or their collapse simulations. Apparently the results were not to their liking."

BS. That's a bald-faced lie.

You're a fraud and a charlatan.

Now come up with another excuse to cover your gross incompetence and stupidity.

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Now get to work, liar. And show your work, idiot.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

You couldn't calculate your way out of wet paper bag -- you incompetent liar.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

STONEWALLING is a violation of the rules of debate.

Now STONEWALL one more time, asshole, AND YOU AUTOMATICALLY FORFEIT THE DEBATE.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:34, Blogger snug.bug said...

Do your own homework, UtterFail. It's not for me to shovel your shit.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You didn't read either of my posts, did you, liar?

Again for the SECOND TIME: I JUST TOLD YOU THAT I'VE ALREADY PERFORMED THE CALCULATIONS AND I KNOW THE CORRECT ANSWERS.

You're a fraud. You can't do the calculations because you're a liar who flunked out of SJSU.

STONEWALLING IS A VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF DEBATE. Thus, you lose the debate again, liar.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Lyin' Brian Good is a FRAUD AND A COWARD, who can't do elementary math! And this JACKASS wants to lecture us about the events of 11 September 2001! What a sick joke!

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:46, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, denying the ground of SLC to liars like you, teasing you into making a fool of yourself with the silly arguments you use, is working to help the widows get their questions answered.

Thanks for proving my point. The widows will never have their questions answered. HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!

And none of you clowns can name even one architect or engineer independent of professional ties to NIST who is willing to to stiock his neck out and express confidence in NIST's collapse sequence.

Uncle Steve, Brian. You lose again.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:49, Blogger Ian said...

Although you should be really pissed off at me for making you look a complete tool. I had you running around on Google looking up a fictional Marvel Comic charactor and you fell right into it. You are a true born sucker Brian. Stand up and take a bow. LMAO!

That's right, Brian is so stupid he went looking for the architectural credentials of a comic book character. HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!

Where do you get the idea that I flunked out of San Jose State?

You told us you failed out of San Jose State.

 
At 11 September, 2013 15:50, Blogger Ian said...

So Brian, I saw a lot of people in lower Manhattan today who were talking about the heroics of one Willie Rodriguez, who saved many lives that day.

It looks like your campaign to smear the man because he rejected your homosexual advances is working about as well as your campaign to get the widows questions answered.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!

 
At 11 September, 2013 16:36, Blogger J Rebori said...

Wow, I come back after ages away and find exactly the same people making the exact same arguments.

Apparently Mr. Good still hasn't realized that the ruling logical standard is "Silence implies consent." until you can prove otherwise, you must assume the silent A&E professionals agree with the official report.

But it is actually heart warming to know some people can be counted on to never change, no matter how much they are proven wrong.

 
At 11 September, 2013 21:22, Blogger David Banner said...

I see that Brian has no reply to what I said earlier. Truth hurts don't it my little bitch? I've made you my bitch and you will do as I tell you to do. I own your life Brian, I've punked you in the worst way possible and yet you took in the ass.

 
At 11 September, 2013 23:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I was so stupid I went to check the claims of a poster at SLC.

Thanks for showing that smart people must assume that all claims at SLC are lies.

And then GB wonders why I'm not willing to do his homework.

Ian, Willie is toast. No 9/11 appearances for him. His news epitaph was the Der Spiegel article that revealed that he lives with a dog named Elvis, and says his story is like trying to pass off a one dollar bill as a twenty.

Also, your buddy Barrett got 30 people to his Million Muslim March.

JR, silence does not imply consent when taboos are involved. You still can't name one independent engineer who will bravely endorse the govedrnment's collapse mechanism.

David Banner, your hangup with homoerotic TV shows makes predictable that you would fantasize about my ass.



 
At 11 September, 2013 23:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying liar lies, "...And then GB wonders why I'm not willing to do his homework."

I'm not asking you to do my "homework" -- you Goddamned charlatan. As I've stated FOUR TIMES IN THIS THREAD ALONE: I JUST TOLD YOU THAT I'VE ALREADY PERFORMED THE CALCULATIONS AND I KNOW THE CORRECT ANSWERS.

I'm asking YOU to substantiate your assertions, liar. You claim that you're smarter than me, THEN PROVE IT.

And you can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

But you can't do the calculations, can you, liar?

So much for your claim to have a "scientific reputation."

You're an idiot -- and you're TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED TO LECTURE ANYONE ABOUT THE COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS.

Is it any wonder that you can't hold down a job mopping floors? You're incompetent -- not to mention a liar.

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

 
At 11 September, 2013 23:58, Blogger snug.bug said...

Utterfail, if you've done the calcs, let's see them. Maybe you can send them to NIST and they can issue a supplemental report.

You never answered my question. Where do you get the idea that I flunked out of San Jose State?

 
At 12 September, 2013 00:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Stop changing the subject, liar, and answer the questions.

YOU CLAIM YOU'RE SMARTER THAN ME, PROVE IT.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

You're as sharp as a marble -- and your continued STONEWALLING proves that you're an idiot and a fraud.

You couldn't think your way out of a wet paper bag.

 
At 12 September, 2013 00:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The charlatan whines, "...Where do you get the idea that I flunked out of San Jose State?"

Because you can't do the calculations and prove that you're smarter than me. It's pretty simple, jackass. Not to mention that you admitted to flunking out of SJSU (and then deleted the comment, which is par for the course for a compulsive liar).

So when do you plan to demonstrate your superior "intelligence", jackass?

 
At 12 September, 2013 04:51, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I was so stupid I went to check the claims of a poster at SLC.

And you never noticed that Google was returning stuff about a comic book character, and thus continued to babble about David Banner the architect until we told you that "David Banner" is a comic book character. Now you just squeal hysterically because even you realize how idiotic it makes you look.

Don't worry, Brian. We all knew you were an idiot long before you went off searching for a comic book character's architectural credentials.

Thanks for showing that smart people must assume that all claims at SLC are lies.

Yup, more humiliated squealing because Brian has no idea how to Google. No wonder he's so confused about 9/11!

 
At 12 September, 2013 04:55, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, Willie is toast. No 9/11 appearances for him. His news epitaph was the Der Spiegel article that revealed that he lives with a dog named Elvis, and says his story is like trying to pass off a one dollar bill as a twenty.

Poor Brian. He's a mentally ill unemployed janitor who got rejected by a hero like Rodriguez, and all he can do now is post hysterical homosexual stalkerspam about it.

Also, your buddy Barrett got 30 people to his Million Muslim March.

Barrett is not my buddy. He's a pathetic lunatic like you, but it does appear that he got slightly more people to the Million Muslim March that the truth movement usually gets to one of its rallies. HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!

 
At 12 September, 2013 04:59, Blogger Ian said...

JR, silence does not imply consent when taboos are involved. You still can't name one independent engineer who will bravely endorse the govedrnment's collapse mechanism.

Hey, who better to tell us how the scientific community operates than a mentally ill unemployed janitor who failed out of San Jose State and lives with his parents?

Also, we've been over this many times and you refuse to learn. Uncle Steve has endorsed the NIST report.

David Banner, your hangup with homoerotic TV shows makes predictable that you would fantasize about my ass.

Yup, we can always count on Brian to start babbling about "hot sexy men" on this blog.

 
At 12 September, 2013 05:02, Blogger Ian said...

BTW, I'm never, ever going to stop humiliating Brian for this one:

Ian, denying the ground of SLC to liars like you, teasing you into making a fool of yourself with the silly arguments you use, is working to help the widows get their questions answered.

Yup, Brian is such a pathetic lunatic and fool that he thinks the 4.5 years he's spent here posting dumbspam about magic thermite elves will get the widows questions answered.

So Brian, you have utterly failed to get a single one of the questions answered in those 4.5 years. How much longer do we have to wait until you posting spam about, say, that "strutting, bragging, lying, hot sexy hunk of Latin manhood", Willie Rodriguez, gets one of their questions answered?

 
At 12 September, 2013 05:02, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Offtopic -- interesting item here. Truthers will no doubt be all over the case.

 
At 12 September, 2013 07:50, Blogger David Banner said...

TRUTHER ARRESTED FOR DEFACING 9/11 MEMORIAL:

www.forwardprogressives.com/crazed-911-conspiracy-nut-­vandalizes-911-memorial/

TRUTHER HAS TO PAY $1,000 IN FINES AND WILL SPEND 2 YEARS IN JAIL.

 
At 12 September, 2013 07:51, Blogger David Banner said...

David Banner, your hangup with homoerotic TV shows makes predictable that you would fantasize about my ass.

What's that my bitch? You want me to get the whip out on you and force you to work in my secret Government sweat shop? Ok asshole, come here.

 
At 12 September, 2013 07:55, Blogger David Banner said...

Ian, I was so stupid I went to check the claims of a poster at SLC.

Finally admitting that he got pwned by yours truly.

 
At 12 September, 2013 07:59, Blogger J Rebori said...

JR, silence does not imply consent when taboos are involved. You still can't name one independent engineer who will bravely endorse the govedrnment's collapse mechanism.

No, there is no exception for taboos. The point is that if you believe something is wrong, you have a duty to speak up or accept it.

And there are lots of first rate, first world technical journals that would love to publish a proper paper disproving the official story that cant be silenced by the US government. Russia has several, China has a bunch, just to name two locations.

Yet you, the one with the burden of proof, can't find a single article in one of those journals that refutes the official story.

You failed.

 
At 12 September, 2013 08:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

RJ wrote, "...No, there is no exception for taboos."

That's correct, JR. In fact, qui tacet consentire videtur [**] is a ancient Latin legal maxim. E.g.,

Legal Dictionary: Acquiescence

That said, Brian Good is an Internet blowhard, who will say ANYTHING, no matter how outrageous or untrue, in defense of his never-ending stream of lies. He's an "expert" on everything UNTIL you challenge the bastard to demonstrate his alleged "intellectual" superiority. When challenged to demonstrate his alleged "intelligence", however, he CONSISTENTLY falls flat on his lying ferret face.



[**] Latin translation: "One who is silent is seen to have given consent."

 
At 12 September, 2013 08:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

So Banner chortles because he lied, and instead of dismissing his lies outright I went and checked them and reported that they did not add up. And that makes me stupid. I see. Your belief that my checking out your lying claims, about which I was skeptical, constitutes pwning me shows you for a fool.

And UtterFail concludes from the fact that I won't do his homework therefore I can't do his homework, and regards that as proof that I attended San Jose State.

Ian, Google wasn't returning stuff about a comic book character, because "The Hulk" was not an architect. If you knew how to google, you would understand that, and then maybe you wouldn't be so confused about 9/11.

Your continued rejoicing about the frustration of the widows is noted.

 
At 12 September, 2013 08:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying liar lies, "...And UtterFail concludes from the fact that I won't do his homework therefore I can't do his homework, and regards that as proof that I attended San Jose State."

FOR THE FIFTH GODDAMNED TIME IN THIS THREAD ALONE: It's not my "homework", asshole, because I've already performed the calculations and I know the correct answer.

It's YOUR HOMEWORK, and so far, you've utterly failed to demonstrate your "intellectual superiority."

YOU CLAIM YOU'RE SMARTER THAN ME, PROVE IT, BLOWHARD.

And you can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

You're a fraud and liar who can't do basic mathematics.

Once again, you FAIL, asshole.

Grade: F-

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

JR, silence is not informed consent.

In science we kind of like to have judgment based on facts.

For instance, the engineering community was almost universally silent in terms of criticizing the FEMA/ASCE zipper/pancake theory in the years after 9/11. And yet that theory bore no relation to reality, and was rejected by the engineering community in 2005 when the NIST report came out.

So what significance has your alleged consent when that consent was demonstrably wrong about zipper/pancake? There is no connection between your alleged consent and engineering reality. Yes, taboos is only a theory. Do you have a better theory?

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:21, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, your inability to distinguish between a claim that you know the answer and a demonstration that you know the answer only shows you for an UtterFool.

And of course none of this has anything to do with your totally unsupported claim that I flunked out of San Jose State.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:29, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yep, Brian Good runs away squealing and crying from a challenge to prove his alleged "intellectual superiority."

So what happened, blowhard? Just the other day you claimed to be "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority," you run away squealing and crying. Just like you ran away squealing and crying from Willie, Mike R, JR and me on NUMEROUS occasions.

So when do you plan to do the calculations, Mr. bogus "scientific reputation"?

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now, run away squealing and crying again, fraud.

You're intellectual midget and a compulsive liar.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:32, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying liar lies, "...UtterFail, your inability to distinguish between a claim that you know the answer and a demonstration that you know the answer only shows you for an UtterFool."

I'll demonstrate my knowledge after you answer the questions. In fact, if you make so much as ONE ERROR, I'll tear you to pieces.

YOU CLAIM YOU'RE SMARTER THAN ME, PROVE IT, BLOWHARD.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

You're a joke.

COWARD.

BLOWHARD.

INTELLECTUAL MIDGET.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:36, Blogger snug.bug said...

Blah, blah, blah. If I performed your challenge, you would only lie about it.

I could analyze your challenge--point out its logical flaws and its mathematical errors--and you would lie about that.

You're a waste of time. Your inability to support your lying claim that i flunked out of San Jose State proves that.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:38, Blogger snug.bug said...

How many did your buddy Barrett attract to his Million Muslim March, by the way?

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You have no evidence to show that I would lie about anything. You, on the other hand, are a PROVEN compulsive liar, and I can provide the links to prove it.

You won't do the calculations because either [1] you can't do them or [2] you won't do them because to do so will expose your lies and incompetence.

So when do you plan to substantiate your claim and prove that you're smarter than me, liar?

You can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now, STONEWALL AND LIE again, blowhard.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here's just one link that proves you're a compulsive liar, pervert and an Internet vandal.

So when do you plan to demonstrate you alleged "intellectual superiority", liar?

You can start right here:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now STONEWALL again, BLOWHARD.

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:52, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh look, it's Spammy McSpamster! He can't back up his claims, so he just covers that up with spam.

Your inability to support your lying claim that I flunked out of San Jose State proves that you're a waste of time. How many did your lying buddy Barrett attract to his Million Muslim March?

 
At 12 September, 2013 09:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Stop changing the subject, liar. You admitted to flunking out of SJSU. That you deleted the comment doesn't change what everyone read. We know what you wrote. Besides, you demonstrate your stupidity and gross incompetence every time you open your mouth.

So, when do you plan to substantiate your claim and demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority"?

Get to work, blowhard:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now STONEWALL and CHANGE THE SUBJECT again, blowhard.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

PROOF THAT BRIAN GOOD IS A PERVERT, LIAR AND DEGENERATE INTERNET VANDAL.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

Your "Proofs" are Poofs, ButtGoo.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, liar, CHANGE THE SUBJECT. Anything but substantiate your assertions. You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

So when do you plan to demonstrate you alleged "intellectual superiority", liar?

You can start right here:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now STONEWALL and attempt to CHANGE THE SUBJECT again, blowhard.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

BRIAN GOOD -- INTERNET VANDAL AND SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:25, Blogger snug.bug said...



Your "Proofs" are POOFS, ButtGoo.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You deleted the comment wherein you admitted to flunking out of SJSU. Just like you deleted the comment wherein you claim to have a "scientific reputation." This is a consistent pattern: Every time you are exposed as a liar, YOU DELETE THE LIE. And we know you delete the lies because only the author of a blog comment can delete it.

Now, stop trying to CHANGE THE SUBJECT AND SUBSTANTIATE YOUR CLAIM.

You CLAIM YOU'RE SMARTER THAN ME, PROVE IT!

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now post more squealspam and attempt to CHANGE THE SUBJECT AGAIN, FRAUD.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:38, Blogger snug.bug said...

Back up your claims, liar.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

FACT: A 4th grader can answer question #1.

So why can't Brian Good, a pervert who claims to have a "scientific reputation," do 4th-grade math?

The answer is simple: Brian Good is fraud and a BLOWHARD.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

You don't want to talk about how many Barrett attracted, do you. Why is that?

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

BLOWHARD.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:42, Blogger snug.bug said...

What makes you think I can't do 4th grade math?

I won't change the oil in your car. Does that mean I can't change the oil in your car?

You're a liar. If I responded to your challenge, you'd lie.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.



 
At 12 September, 2013 10:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"Scientific reputation" my ass.

You couldn't operate a 4 function calculator, let alone master a scientific calculator. BLOWHARD.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Now CHANGE THE SUBJECT, BLOWHARD.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

BLOWHARD.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

What makes you think I can't do 4th grade math?

I won't change the oil in your car. Does that mean I can't change the oil in your car?

You're a liar. If I responded to your challenge, you'd lie.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:49, Blogger snug.bug said...

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiewdRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, liar, anything but substantiate your claim to be "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated". than me.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD IS SO LAME THAT HE CAN'T ANSWER QUESTION NUMBER 1 WITHOUT MAKING GROSS ERRORS!

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

BLOWHARD.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

As always, I can substantiate my claims. Brian Good, on the other hand...

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 10:56, Blogger snug.bug said...

As always, you can't substantiate your claims.

What makes you think I can't do 4th grade math?

I won't change the oil in your car. Does that mean I can't change the oil in your car?

You're a liar. If I responded to your challenge, you'd lie.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, faggot, DELETE THE COMMENTS WHEREIN YOU ADMITTED TO FLUNKING OUT OF SAN JOSE STATE AND THEN CLAIM THAT YOU NEVER MADE THE ADMISSION.

You're a fraud.

So when do you plan to prove that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me?

You can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

You're a fraud and a liar.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

It would hilarious if you weren't so disgusting.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:06, Blogger snug.bug said...

As always, you can't substantiate your claims. When did I ever admit that I flunked out of San Jose State?

What makes you think I can't do 4th grade math?

I won't change the oil in your car. Does that mean I can't change the oil in your car?

You're a liar. If I responded to your challenge, you'd lie.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, liar, ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AND, IN THE PROCESS, AVOID SUBSTANTIATING YOUR ASSERTIONS.
SO HOW TIMES MUST I REPEAT MYSELF, LIAR?

YOU DELETED THE COMMENTS WHEREIN YOU ADMITTED TO FLUNKING OUT OF SAN JOSE STATE AND THEN YOU CLAIM THAT YOU NEVER MADE THE ADMISSION. THIS IS HOW BRIAN GOOD "PROVES" THAT I "LIE." HE MAKES A STATEMENT, DELETES THE COMMENT, AND THEN FALSELY CLAIMS THAT I "LIE."

You're a transparent fraud.

So when do you plan to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual" superiority, liar?

We're waiting. You can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

As always, you can't substantiate your claims. When did I ever admit that I flunked out of San Jose State? I admitted it and then I deleted the admission? When was that?
When did I attend San Jose State? When did I flunk out? Back up your claims, liar.

What makes you think I can't do 4th grade math?

I won't change the oil in your car. Does that mean I can't change the oil in your car?

You're a liar. If I responded to your challenge, you'd lie.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:26, Blogger snug.bug said...

You'd think that Wizzie would be anxious to vindicate himself after Der Spiegel said he was trying to pass off a one dollar bill as a twenty--but just might be crazy enough to believe his own bullshit.

But no, he's not appearing anywhere.

Poor Wizzie--only fools like Ian and UtterFail believe him today.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, faggot, DELETE THE COMMENTS WHEREIN YOU ADMITTED TO FLUNKING OUT OF SAN JOSE STATE AND THEN CLAIM THAT YOU NEVER MADE THE ADMISSION.

Get it through your thick skull, liar: YOU DELETED THE COMMENTS WHEREIN YOU ADMITTED TO FLUNKING OUT OF SAN JOSE STATE AND THEN YOU CLAIM THAT YOU NEVER MADE THE ADMISSION. THIS IS HOW BRIAN GOOD "PROVES" THAT I "LIE." HE MAKES A STATEMENT, DELETES THE COMMENT, AND THEN FALSELY CLAIMS THAT I "LIE."

So when do you plan to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual" superiority, liar?

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:35, Blogger snug.bug said...

You can't substantiate your claims but only repeat them, liar.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I CAN EASILY PROVE THAT YOU ADMITTED TO FLUNKING OUT OF SJSU.

Everyone knows you made the admission back in 2011: Ian, MGF, RGT, Pat, James -- EVERYONE.

Not one person will claim they didn't see the comment wherein you admitted to dropping out of SJSU.

YOU DELETED THE COMMENTS WHEREIN YOU ADMITTED TO FLUNKING OUT OF SAN JOSE STATE AND THEN YOU CLAIM THAT YOU NEVER MADE THE ADMISSION. THIS IS HOW BRIAN GOOD "PROVES" THAT I "LIE." HE MAKES A STATEMENT, DELETES THE COMMENT, AND THEN FALSELY CLAIMS THAT I "LIE."

You're nothing but an underhanded liar.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:36, Blogger snug.bug said...

When did I ever admit that I flunked out of San Jose State? I admitted it and then I deleted the admission? When was that?
When did I attend San Jose State? When did I flunk out? Back up your claims, liar.

What makes you think I can't do 4th grade math?

I won't change the oil in your car. Does that mean I can't change the oil in your car?

You're a liar. If I responded to your challenge, you'd lie.

Back up your claim that I flunked out of San Jose State, liar.

Tell us how many your lying buddy Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT, LIAR. YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. I HAVE THE HYPERLINK WHEREIN YOU MADE THE ADMISSION, AND NOW IT'S GONE. OBVIOUSLY, YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. FACT: ONLY THE AUTHOR OF A COMMENT CAN DELETE THE COMMENT.

Now stop BICKERING AND ANSWER THE GODDAMNED QUESTIONS:

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

PROVE IT, LIAR.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

Now, STONEWALL ONE MORE TIME AND YOU AUTOMATICALLY FORFEIT THE DEBATE.

 
At 12 September, 2013 11:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I repeat:

Now, STONEWALL ONE MORE TIME AND YOU AUTOMATICALLY FORFEIT THE DEBATE.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 12:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LOL!

LYIN' BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

Does anyone need more proof that we're dealing with a college dropout, compulsive liar, Internet vandal and degenerate sex stalker?

For God's sake, a 4th grader could answer question #1. And this jackass wants you to take him seriously while he prattles on about the events of 11 September 2001? What a sick joke.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 12:30, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh wow, if your hyperlink doesn't prove your point, that means that the proof was deleted!

Do you have no idea how paranoid that sounds?

You're so funny, stamping your little patent-leather pig feet!



Tell us how many your lying buddy Kevin Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 12:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The idiot whines, "...Oh wow, if your hyperlink doesn't prove your point, that means that the proof was deleted!"

That's not what I said -- you straw man argument spewing jackass. Why must I constantly explain to you what I DIDN'T SAY? All you have are logical fallacies and BS.

YOU DELETED THE CONTENT OF THE HYPERLINK. AGAIN, ONLY THE AUTHOR OF A POST CAN DELETE A POST. THUS, ONLY YOU COULD HAVE DELETED THE ADMISSION WHEREIN YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU DROPPED OUT OF SJSU.

You're pathetic. And your underhanded lie tactics are as transparent as the air between your filthy, unwashed ears -- you stooooooopid old smelly unwashed hippie bastard.

STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT, LIAR. YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. I HAVE THE HYPERLINK WHEREIN YOU MADE THE ADMISSION, AND NOW IT'S GONE. OBVIOUSLY, YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. FACT: ONLY THE AUTHOR OF A COMMENT CAN DELETE THE COMMENT.

Now stop BICKERING AND ANSWER THE GODDAMNED QUESTIONS:

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

Now, either substantiate your assertion, or STFU -- you incompetent liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

You won't answer the questions or do the calculations because you're a liar and a fraud.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 12:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here, idiot, I'll ask you some question that are more your speed.

[1] Let's try metric conversion, jackass. How many feet in 0.0 meters?

[2] What time is it when the big hand is on the 12 and the little hand is on the 5?

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

Cretin.

 
At 12 September, 2013 12:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here's another question for you, genius.

[3] Spell the following: Reagan, Bush, Carter and Clinton.

I hope your micrcephallic noggin doesn't explode trying to answer that one, Einstein.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:09, Blogger snug.bug said...



Oh wow, if your hyperlink doesn't prove your point, that means that the proof was deleted!

Do you have no idea how paranoid that sounds?

You're so funny, stamping your little patent-leather pig feet!



Tell us how many your lying buddy Kevin Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT, LIAR. YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. I HAVE THE HYPERLINK WHEREIN YOU MADE THE ADMISSION, AND NOW IT'S GONE. OBVIOUSLY, YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. FACT: ONLY THE AUTHOR OF A COMMENT CAN DELETE THE COMMENT.

Now stop BICKERING AND ANSWER THE GODDAMNED QUESTIONS:

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

Now, either substantiate your assertion, or STFU -- you incompetent liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here's another question that's guaranteed to make your empty head spin, cretin:

[4] Six kings of England have been called George, the last one being George the Sixth. Name the previous five.

You're almost as pathetic as you are dishonest to the core, idiot.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Come on, stoooooooooooooooooooooopid, give it try.

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh wow, if your hyperlink doesn't prove your point, that means that the proof was deleted!

Do you have no idea how paranoid that sounds?

You're so funny, stamping your little patent-leather pig feet!



Tell us how many your lying buddy Kevin Barrett attracted to his Million Muslim March.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still lying and spewing your deliberate misinterpretations of my argument, liar? Since Brian Good lies for a living all he has are straw man arguments and logical fallacies. Should we expect less from a college dropout who can't hold down a job mopping floors? Probably not.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH GRADE MATH!

Yo idiot! Here's another question that will likely make your scat-filled head explode:

[5] Explain Le Chateliers Principle of Dynamic Equilibrium OR spell your name in BLOCK LETTERS.

Here's another one for you, jerkoff. Now stop masturbating for a moment and concentrate, jackass.

[6] Name one "college educated" janitor? Go for it! Name just one, jackass.

Cretin.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

My apologies if I interrupted your hectic masturbation schedule, Onan.

 
At 12 September, 2013 13:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Come on, punk, let's see your alleged math chops, loser:

STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT, LIAR. YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. I HAVE THE HYPERLINK WHEREIN YOU MADE THE ADMISSION, AND NOW IT'S GONE. OBVIOUSLY, YOU DELETED THE COMMENT. FACT: ONLY THE AUTHOR OF A COMMENT CAN DELETE THE COMMENT.

Now stop BICKERING AND ANSWER THE GODDAMNED QUESTIONS:

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

Now, either substantiate your assertion, or STFU -- you incompetent liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

If you have a GED, I'll eat my shoe.

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:31, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

This idiot Brian Good as always is claiming I have not appeared anywhere. He cannot stop lying. Brian as always looking for my attention and my answers, (it turns him on I guess). BG please provide me the name of your legal counsel.

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:38, Blogger snug.butt.plug said...

Willie, my legal representative is the distinguished law firm Simpering Homo & Simpering Homo, Esq.

Phone: 1-800-ASS-CLOWN

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:42, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

I figured those were your representatives. I called the number and Janice answered it and asked me for Elvis.

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

William Rodriguez, your hero story is a lie and I have proven it. You are a con artist. You can't sue me, because my claims are true. You would lose. You would have to pay my court costs.

Where did you appear publicly on 9/11/13? How come you're not in the DC conference this weekend?

You're busted as a liar and a fraud.

How's Elvis?

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:56, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

You can't sue me, because my claims are true. You would lose. You would have to pay my court costs.

I am ready for it, give me the name of your legal counsel.

How's Elvis?
waiting for Janice Good.

Where did you appear publicly on 9/11/13?

International Media and Ground Zero for the ceremony


How come you're not in the DC conference this weekend?

none of your business.

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:58, Blogger snug.bug said...

Not to mention that your uddy Barrett got 30 supporters to his Million Muslim March.

 
At 12 September, 2013 14:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

What Int'l media put you at Ground Zero?

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:00, Blogger snug.butt.plug said...

Willie, Simpering Homo & Simpering Homo, Esq. strive to serve the indigent homosexual community. We're proud to be pro-bono and pro-homo.

"I'm not only the president, I'm a client." -- Brian "meatball on a fork" Good.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:02, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

the media doesn't "put me on Ground Zero", I went to Ground Zero, exactly were I had to be on yesterday.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

So you went there.but you can't prove it, and you got no media coverage.

You're a liar and a fraud, you steal your glory from the dead, and nothing you say can change that fact.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Hey, goat fucker, here's another question that will most likely make your shit-filled head explode:

[7] Advanced math. If you have three apples how many apples do you have?

Fuckin' idiot.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:11, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

So you went there.but you can't prove it, and you got no media coverage.
I went there and no need to prove it to you or anybody else, it is a family and victims event. A solemn moment for us.
I was busy with media all day, until 12 last night. why you need my schedule? you want to see me? ughhh.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:16, Blogger snug.butt.plug said...

Willie, as an indigent homosexual, I can no more afford "legal counsel" than I can afford Perigord truffles.

All my claptrap about "legal counsel" is nothing but hot air.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:18, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

So you went there.but you can't prove it, and you got no media coverage.
Try to prove it.

Tell us how come your hero Wizzie LiedRugAs didn't appear in public on 9/11 anywhere.

Try prove it for us
You can't , it is your claims and your a lying.
Please provide me with the name of your legal counsel.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:21, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

( Brian Good desperately looking on google for my media appearances, he knows he screwed up!)

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:26, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, Google wasn't returning stuff about a comic book character, because "The Hulk" was not an architect. If you knew how to google, you would understand that, and then maybe you wouldn't be so confused about 9/11.

Your continued rejoicing about the frustration of the widows is noted.


Poor Brian. He's humiliated because he's been pwn3d by David Banner, and pwn3d by me. I doubt Brian will be making the pathetic, desperate claim that his dumbspam on this blog will get the widows' questions answered ever again.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:29, Blogger Ian said...

So you went there.but you can't prove it, and you got no media coverage.

You're a liar and a fraud, you steal your glory from the dead, and nothing you say can change that fact.


Brian's hysterical because Rodriguez was where he should have been yesterday: at the site of his greatest hour.

Brian couldn't be at the WTC site even if he wanted to. He can't afford the airfare. He can't even afford a decent haircut!

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:31, Blogger snug.bug said...

Wizzie LiedRugAs, I can't prove you had no media coverage. That's proving a negative. Impossible.

You can't prove you did have media coverage. You're a liar and a fraud., and nothing you say can change the fact.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:31, Blogger David Banner said...

So Banner chortles because he lied, and instead of dismissing his lies outright I went and checked them and reported that they did not add up. And that makes me stupid. I see. Your belief that my checking out your lying claims, about which I was skeptical, constitutes pwning me shows you for a fool.

And yet you Googled up a Marvel Comic charactor and fell right into the rabbit hole deeper.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:36, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

I can't prove you had no media coverage. That's proving a negative. Impossible.

You can't prove you did have media coverage. You're a liar and a fraud., and nothing you say can change the fact.


Therefore you lied.

You were the one claiming I did not, like every year on this date, and then I come and make you look like an ass.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:36, Blogger snug.bug said...

I didn't fall into anything. I showed that your claims were not true.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:39, Blogger Ian said...

Hey Brian, remember that time you were banned from Wikipedia for vandalism?

Yeah, I pwn3d you about that, despite your pathetic lies. Now you just squeal and squeal every time I bring it up.

And of course, let's not forget that you were banned from the Northern California Truth Alliance too.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:40, Blogger David Banner said...

I showed that your claims were not true.

By doing 0% of research to see if you can actually get my real name? Get to work then you total dipshit, there's alot of architects out there.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Goat fucker, as a proven compulsive liar, you have no idea what is true or false.

So when do you plan to give us a demonstration of your alleged "intellectual superiority," charlatan?

You can start right here, asshole:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

Cretin.

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Ian wrote, "...Hey Brian, remember that time you were banned from Wikipedia for vandalism?"

Read all about it, right here:

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

Fancy that! A homosexual who's obsessed with Asian girls with no tits and boi butts.

LOL!

BRAIN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:44, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

I showed that your claims were not true.
How about showing your claims that I did not have any media coverage is true?
How about providing the name of your legal counsel?

 
At 12 September, 2013 15:44, Blogger David Banner said...

How can I be "lying" about myself being an architect when some lowlife welfare bum SSI collecting jackass can't even research anything?

You really want to prove me wrong Brian? Get my real name and my professional position in architecture, otherwise I'm gonna make you look like a total tool that you are.

 
At 12 September, 2013 16:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, sao somehow it's my fault that Willie can't show any media coverage.

William, your hero story is a lie. You stole it from Pablo Ortiz, you've defrauded your admirers, you have no media coverage, and you can't sue me because everything I say is true.

Go piss up a rope.

 
At 12 September, 2013 16:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Don't you love it when the lying liar, "snug.bug," who has not a shred of evidence to support his argument against Willie, calls William a "liar"?

We know who the real liar is, and it isn't William Rodriguez.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

In fact, "snug.bug" is LIVID because William Rodriguez spurned "snug.bug"'s homosexual advances.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Hell hath no fury like a homo scorned.

LOL!

BRAIN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

 
At 12 September, 2013 16:53, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, gee, UtterFail is such an UtterFool that he believes the blatant lies of a 9/11 con artist.

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he can do about that.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

On the contrary, liar, I know you well enough to know that not a word that emanates from your keyboard is true.

In fact, you haven't proven a thing. All you have are lies and deliberate misinterpretation of the events surrounding that fateful day, which has been proven over-and-over-and-over-and-over again.

You're the con artist. And this thread, like every other thread that appears at SLC, stands as testament to that fact.

We know who the real liar, con artist and degenerate is, and it's not Willie.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

BRAIN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH GRADE MATH.

So, asshole, when do you plan to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority?

You can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRAIN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:01, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail is such an UtterFool that he believes the blatant lies of a 9/11 con artist.

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he can do about that.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You haven't proven a damned thing.

Your 100% fact-free opinion and misinterpretation of the facts isn't "proof" of anything other than your bottomless dishonesty.

So, asshole, when do you plan to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority?

You can start right here, liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail is such an UtterFool that he believes the blatant lies of a 9/11 con artist.

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he can do about that.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, goat fucker, repeat yourself like a broken record while you steadfastly refuse to substantiate your claims.

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

You're a fraud -- and that's obvious.

Now, either substantiate your assertion, or STFU -- you incompetent liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

So when do you plan to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority," liar?

You don't have any evidence against Willie and the only thing you've managed to prove is BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH.

Good job, charlatan.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here's another question for you, cretin:

[8] The Star Spangled Banner is the National Anthem for what country?

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:22, Blogger snug.bug said...



UtterFail is such an UtterFool that he believes the blatant lies of a 9/11 con artist.

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he can do about that.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What's the matter. nincompoop, you can't do the math?

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

Now, either substantiate your assertion, or STFU -- you incompetent liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Who do you think you're fooling, cretin?

BRAIN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH, AND THIS JACKASS WANTS TO LECTURE US ABOUT 9/11? What a sick joke.

Make no mistake, motherfucker, I CAN SIT HERE AND DRAG YOU THROUGH THE MUD ALL DAY LONG.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:33, Blogger snug.bug said...

UTTERfOOL Believes the blatant lies of a 9/11 con artist.

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he OR YOU can do about that.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:37, Blogger Ian said...

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he can do about that.

Brian, no matter how many times you repeat this, it makes no difference. You have not proven anything other than that you are a depraved lunatic who lusts after Rodriguez.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yes, you "proved it." Just like you "proved" that you can do elementary mathematics BY REFUSING TO DO THE CALCULATIONS.

Yep, in the goat fucker's world, lack of evidence is "evidence," and his continued refusal to do elementary mathematics "proves" the goat fucker's alleged "intellectual superiority."

You're an idiot and a COWARD.

THE GOAT FUCKER CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:42, Blogger snug.bug said...

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he OR YOU can do about that.


 
At 12 September, 2013 17:47, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

How about showing your claims that I did not have any media coverage is true?
How about providing the name of your legal counsel?

hey Brian, have you made new crank calls lately to Carol Brouillet?

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Squeal, squeal, squeal.

Anything but do the math or provide something other than your twisted opinion, deliberate misrepresentation of the facts and bald-faced lies.

You're worthless -- and that's an insult to the worthless.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4th-GRADE MATH.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:51, Blogger snug.bug said...

How about showing that you had media coverage? I can'r prove a negative.

I never made any crank calls to Carol Brouillet. I only called six or eight times ever, even though I was the treasurer of her congressional campaign in 2006.

 
At 12 September, 2013 17:57, Blogger snug.bug said...

William Rodriguez is a liar and a fraud. I have proven it. He is not appearing in the DC 9/11 conference even though his buddy Kevin Barrett is stinking it up thoroughly.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...I literally had to kick him out. This guy [Rodriguez] wanted to stay with me all the time...This is the true hero of 9/11." -- NJNY Port Authority Officer David Lim

So who should we believe? A proven compulsive liar or Officer Lim, an EYEWITNESS TO WILLIE'S HEROICS?

Let's see? Should we believe a liar who was 3000 miles away in California, or an EYEWITNESS TO WILLIE'S HEROICS?

I think the choice is obvious.

You lose again, goat fucker.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:07, Blogger snug.bug said...

David Lim did not mention Willie at all in his 9/11 Commission testimony.

Mr. Lim's current posture is that he will not comment about Mr. Rodriguez.

Of course if you had any knowledge of the issues y9u would know this. But you don't.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yes, David Lim no longer mentions Willie, but not for the reason you cite.

When Officer Lim declared WIllie a hero, THE 9/11 "TRUTH" MOVEMENT DID NOT EXIST. OBVIOUSLY, OFFICER LIM DISTANCED HIMSELF FROM WILLIE AFTER WILLIE JOINED THE 9/11 "TRUTH" MOVEMENT.

Officer Lim has never retracted his words in terms of Willie's heroics. He only distanced himself from Willie after he joined YOUR IDIOTIC 9/11 "TRUTH" MOVEMENT.

See? You're an lying cretin who can't get the facts straight without making gross errors and self-serving misinterpretations of the FACTS.

Face it, goat fucker, your whining and lying will never compel Willie to love you. Nor will your whining and lying get you the attention you so desperately seek from Willie.

"...I literally had to kick him out. This guy [Rodriguez] wanted to stay with me all the time...This is the true hero of 9/11." -- NJNY Port Authority Officer David Lim

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

BRAIN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:19, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

How about showing that you had media coverage? I can'r prove a negative.

you are the one making the claim I did not, remember?
But I will help you.
Here are some of the programs I was honored on:

CNN International Cala -Yesterday at 9:00 PM. (showed all evening after that until today at 7:00PM)
In studio connection from NYC for all over Latin America and USA.

CNN Latino “Sin Limites with Elizabeth Espinosa” - Last night at 11:20 PM ( rebroadcast , all evening)for all over Latin America and USA Via Skype from NJ.

AmericaTV with Pedro Sevcec- at 8:30PM for all over Latin America and USA- Via Skype from NJ.

Network Super Estrella, California
11:00AM from Ground Zero

Univision Radio International 7:30 AM from Ground Zero re-broadcasted all day.

WRadio Network- All Latin America- 12:00 PM - from Ground Zero re-broadcasted all day.

Caracol Radio International- All over Latin America- 1:30 PM- re-broadcasted all day.

Carmen Jovet en Noti Uno 630 Radio- Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands- 9:30 AM- From Ground Zero.

There is a sample for you of how busy I was. Also 2 Television Special about my story came out yesterday:
The Biography Channel TV series "I Survived" and Televisa Network from Mexico, "Esta Cañon", seen all over Latin America and USA. They both will re-broadcast Tomorrow Friday if you want to see any of them, I know you will make an effort to see them so you can fantasize about me.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:22, Blogger snug.bug said...

Mr. Lim refuses to comment on Willie. He did not mention Willie in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission. Thanks for validating this.

Willie Rodriguez is a liar and a fraud. I can say that with no fear of legal consequences because it is true.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:26, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

He is not appearing in the DC 9/11 conference even though his buddy Kevin Barrett is stinking it up thoroughly.
Now, come on Brian, we know the real stinker is you, same clothes, same haircut, same greasy hair. No wonder my friend Carol was freaked out from your advances!

I choose where to appear and when.

I see you were not invited because your friends from the pentagon were there , oh wait, I remember the truthers do not like you!

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:27, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh brother, Willie's so busy being on TV that he can not give us actual links.

You're a liar, Willie. There's no reason even to check.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying liar lies, "...Mr. Lim refuses to comment on Willie. He did not mention Willie in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission. Thanks for validating this."

I din't "validate" anything, liar. I proved that your line of reasoning" is a crock of shit.

Officer Lim distanced himself from Willie because he joined the 9/11 "truth" movement -- the same "truth" movement THAT ACCUSES THE NY/NJ Port Authority OFFICERS AND FDNY FIREMEN OF BEING ACCOMPLICES TO THE MURDER OF 2,753 innocent victims of Muslim terrorism.

Your idiotic argument, as always, is a half-truth -- and a half truth is still a whole LIE.

See? You can't be trusted to tell the WHOLE TRUTH.

You're not a "truther," you're a viscous, sex-addicted compulsive liar who will do anything to destroy Willie's reputation because he rejected your homosexual advances.

Your motives are as transparent as the air between your ears.

Once again, you FAIL, goat fucker.

BRIAN GOOD CAN'T DO 4TH-GRADE MATH!

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Willie is something you'll never be, goat fucker -- a hero.

"...I literally had to kick him out. This guy [Rodriguez] wanted to stay with me all the time...This is the true hero of 9/11." -- NJ/NY Port Authority Officer David Lim.

It was Willie's association with the 9/11 "truth" movement which compelled Officer Lim to distance himself from Willie, not your mythical bullshit.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:39, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

Oh brother, Willie's so busy being on TV that he can not give us actual links.

You're a liar, Willie. There's no reason even to check.


are you that lazy? The reality is that I just humiliated your lie. nope , I made my claim now ,you prove me wrong, contact those networks or shows and prove me wrong. HAHAHHAHA Good luck, proving it! Do not forget to tune in tomorrow!

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:41, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

you are 100% correct Guitarbill!
My mistake.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:43, Blogger snug.bug said...

Willie, you've lied so egregiously there's no reason to prove it any more.
You stole your story from Pablo Ortiz. You're a bag of scum.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:45, Blogger William_Rodriguez said...

You harassed Carol, you harassed other truthers, you are a pervert, you lied about the victims of 9/11 you lied about me and you were removed from Richard Gage from harassing me more than once. You love me and you are angry I did not accepted your advances. I say it with no fear of legal consequences because it is true.
You are Petgoat,and that is true. Remember when you said I unmasked you several times with the help of Norwegian hackers...
When you claimed I made any employer you had to fire you?

I just slapped you again by showing your lied about me and my appearances , like every year. Now have fun babbling away, I have more interesting things to do, with media and presentations , than loosing more time with your Spam and stupidity. Call your lawyer. Ha!

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Willie wrote, "...you are 100% correct Guitarbill!"

Of course I'm correct. After all, that's why I make the big bucks. There's no room for error in IT security research.

"...I literally had to kick him out. This guy [Rodriguez] wanted to stay with me all the time...This is the true hero of 9/11."

Officer Lim didn't pan your heroics, he despises the 9/11 "truth" movement and everything it represents.

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying liar whines, "...You're a bag of scum."

Project much, liar?

 
At 12 September, 2013 18:51, Blogger Ian said...

Willie's hero story is a lie. I've proven it. There's nothing he OR YOU can do about that.

Poor Brian. He's so pathetic that he's resorted to the whole "capital letters" argument.

Brian, the fact remains that Rodriguez is a hero who was honored yesterday while you spent the day posting dumbspam on this blog (as always).

Brian, you can squeal and squeal and squeal and claim that you've "proved" that Rodriguez is a liar, but nobody will ever listen to a word you say. Sorry.

 
At 12 September, 2013 21:24, Blogger David Banner said...

I'd like to see Brian taken to court by the Truth Movement and Richard Gage and Kevin Barrett and Willie Rodriguez and Carol Brouilett. He'd be in a world of shit if that happened.

 
At 12 September, 2013 22:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

"David", your fantasies about court are silly. I haven't done anything illegal and I haven't done anything wrong. I exposed the 9/11 fraudster, Willie Rodriguez, for what he is. Do you have a problem with that?

 
At 12 September, 2013 22:03, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh look at Silly Willie NWOR!

How come you're not on the lineup in DC, eh, scamster? Too busy? Too busy doing what?

 
At 12 September, 2013 23:55, Blogger David Banner said...

Do you have a problem with that?

You have a problem alright.

 
At 12 September, 2013 23:56, Blogger David Banner said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 13 September, 2013 04:52, Blogger Ian said...

I exposed the 9/11 fraudster, Willie Rodriguez, for what he is.

False. You've just posted homosexual squealspam here.

Your attempt to paint Rodriguez as a fraud is going about as well as your attempt to get the widows questions answered, or to get a new investigation. I would expect nothing less from you, Brian.

 
At 13 September, 2013 09:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

I exposed the 9/11 fraudster, Willie Rodriguez, for what he is, liar.

His claim that hundreds of people were huddled behind locked fire exit doors waiting for a janitor with a "Key of Hope" to set them free is not true.

Death statistics show that survival rates on Willie's 39 floors were no higher than those on any of the other 120-something floors under the impact zone.

Willie stole his hero story from Pablo Ortiz, a true hero who broke down stuck doors on the 89th floor and saved dozens of lives before he was killed on 9/11.

 
At 13 September, 2013 11:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

Poor Willie. For the rest of his life he'll have to go around denying that he's the Willie R who lied about 9/11.

How's Elvis doing, Willie? Is it true that your story about your marriage and your baby were just as phony as the rest of your tales?

 
At 13 September, 2013 16:50, Blogger Ian said...

I exposed the 9/11 fraudster, Willie Rodriguez, for what he is, liar.

False.

 
At 13 September, 2013 17:08, Blogger snug.bug said...

I exposed the fraudulence of Willie's her story, and the fact that he stole the story of Pablo Ortiz.

You're a liar, Ian.

 
At 13 September, 2013 21:59, Blogger David Banner said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 14 September, 2013 02:21, Blogger Pat said...

David, do not post anybody's phone number here.

 
At 14 September, 2013 08:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh I'm used to crank calls. Mostly they're just hangup calls. I once had Rob Balsamo trying to bully me for almost an hour. He was pissed at me because I posted a list of 24 questions for him at 911oz and he couldn't answer any of them. He was also pissed because I showed that his claim that flight 77 landed on DCA runway 15 was ludicrous.

 
At 14 September, 2013 11:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What?!?!?!?!? No links to substantiate the lies about your fellow incompetent, lying, mathematics-illiterate nut-bag Boooob Balsamo?, liar?

No links, no cigar, liar.

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

FACT: You can always tell when Brian "meatball on a fork" Good (aka "snug.bug") is lying: His liver-spotted fingers are touching a keyboard.

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good (aka, "snug.bug") Unmasked!

 
At 14 September, 2013 11:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And speaking of mathematics-illiterate cretins, I'm still waiting for you to perform the following calculations, Mr. bogus "scientific reputation."

You claim that you're "smarter, better-looking, and better-educated" than me. Yet, when challenged to demonstrate your alleged "intellectual superiority", you run away squealing and crying.

Now, either substantiate your assertion, or STFU -- you incompetent liar:

[1] Calculate the weight of each WTC Tower floor in kilograms.

[2] Given the weight of each floor, calculate the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor in kilograms.

[3] Given Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states

F = ma

derive a differential equation that describes an accreting mass.

[4] At collapse initiation, NIST tells us that the upper floor hit the lower floor in 0.43 seconds. How fast was the accreting mass moving when the upper floor struck the lower floor? Give your answer in m/s and MPH.

[5] Calculate the force the upper portion of the tower exerted on the lower floors. Give your answer in kg.m/s^2 and convert that answer to lbs.

[6] Compare the value from question number [5] to the upper and lower static load boundaries for each floor which you gave us in question [2]. Which value is greater? And by how much?

Oh, that's right! You're just as incompetent and mathematics illiterate as your fellow lying nut-bag, Booooob Balsamo.

My bad.

BRIAN GOOD -- PERVERT, LIAR, INTERNET VANDAL AND DEGENERATE SEX STALKER EXPOSED

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good (aka, "snug.bug") Unmasked!

 
At 14 September, 2013 18:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, why should I be interested in your calcs? Show me NIST's calcs.

If NIST didn't do them, why should I? YOu're silly.

 
At 16 September, 2013 18:55, Blogger snug.bug said...

Calling GutterBall. Calling GutterBall. Pat's going to want to lock this thread, so you'd better come in with your lying linkspam soon. Don't keep him waiting.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home