United 93 Debunked
The genius who brought us the rabbit cage experiment to recreate the World Trade Center fires, and tiny wooden planes being pushed into tiny wooden buildings is back for entertainment value. He now has a detailed scientific analysis of the crash of United Flight 93, which he titles, "Hopefully, My Last Analysis of the Flight 93 Crash". Yeah, we can only hope.
Little Green Footballs even called it the Hilarious Lefty Post of the Day. I must say, the ruled paper was such a classy touch. You can read it here. H/T Shawn in the comments.
posted by James B. @ 6:18 PM
22 comments
22 Comments:
Kevin Barrett's segment on Hannity and Colmes just wrapped up. Interesting. I have to give Barrett credit for keeping the focus on 9/11.
It would have be beneficial if Fox showed any WTC 7 video.
I have to say it was nice to hear Hannity silenced to some degree by Barrett's talking over him.
Your plane wasn't constructed out of rabbit wire, so it doesn't count.
i wonder how his "scientific" analysis accounts for this twisting
There must be some bug in the CAD software he was using.
Honestly.... Are we to take serious a man who can't even draw a straight horizon on lined notebook paper?
This guy reminds me of my sister when she was a toddler. Mom would always go out and buy these expensive toys proven to make children happy, but she was just pleased as punch to chill with some Tupperware and a wooden spoon.
It's like, why waste money on things like computer models, engineering degrees, forensic analysis, etc... when all you really need is some chickenwire, a mechanical pencil, and the remnants of your 3rd grade TrapperKeeper.
I hope this guy never stops, the comments people are leaving on his blog are wicked hilarious.
Like, hey man, you can learn a lot I men from this stuff, I even have a friend who is in charge of a Gorilla Group of Monkeys and Penguins, but like I'm not sure if Gorrilla's are monkeys or not, cause, like you know if a chimp isn't a monkey, like what is a monkey - it's just common sense, you know, I mean if it looks like a monkey, and well, it smells like a monkey, well then, there's no way its not a monkey, but its just disinformation about being a monkey, hey like you know, I'll put my man Jason on that cause if there's anyone who know monkeys, its like I mean, my man Jason.
Even if its only secondary.
What is halarious is those who think a 155ft plane disappeared underground, wings and tail section included, with 1,000's of gals of fuel still on board then it managed to spit out a little bit of scrap parts, human remains, and fuel up and over the little service road and into the forest which was at a very odd angle for it to do that.
And don't forget that the entire plane that went underground burrowed further than one of it's engine! Ya know, the one that even shocked "bg".
What is halarious is those who think a 155ft plane disappeared underground, wings and tail section included, with 1,000's of gals of fuel still on board then it managed to spit out a little bit of scrap parts, human remains, and fuel up and over the little service road and into the forest which was at a very odd angle for it to do that.
That's not exactly how it happened, Killtown, but I'm not surprised you got it totally wrong once again.
Shawn said...That's not exactly how it happened
Well please, what did I say that wasn't accurate.
Well, first, the plane didn't "disappear".
Of course you don't understand how explosions work - wonder where the Flight 77 tail went, do we?
Hell, that's more "scrap" then we find on the Pentagon lawn
That doesn't look like a lot of metal to you? I've seen pictures of crash sites with less.
And how was the angle odd?
than*
1) Shawn said...Well, first, the plane didn't "disappear".
2) Of course you don't understand how explosions work - wonder where the Flight 77 tail went, do we?
3) Hell, that's more "scrap" then we find on the Pentagon lawn
4) That doesn't look like a lot of metal to you? I've seen pictures of crash sites with less.
5) And how was the angle odd?
1) It disappeared underground (allegedly).
2) UA 93 didn't explode if is disappeared underground.
3) That obvious planted scrap? Again, found in the forest.
4) Yes, just like the Coroner described..."the smoking crater looked, he says, 'like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it.'"
5)It's like you running straight and your backpack flies off to your right.
James, there is apparently a post out there where Spooky911 does his rabbit fencing experiment, but this time he tries shooting little plane-like objects with a slingshot. I came across mention of it at DU today.
debunking911, what angle did 93 crash at, 45 or nearly 90? Those are the two reports given.
And aren't you the one who said there were 2 craters?
I'm with murdervillage (whose tenacity is quite devestatingly Speaking Truth to killtown).
Where are those 30-40 incriminating and Truther vindicating eyewitness interviews we were told about?
They don't exist - that's where. They never happened. "killtown" made this assertion up, and continues studiously to ignore all requests to substantiate it.
And another 9-11 CT whackjob bites the dust.
Bwahaha!
I'd be curious to read those interviews as well, KT. It's a slow day here at work.
You cheapen their death because you hate Bush and the war.
That's not his motivation. His motivation is that he shares the terrorists' aims of weakening and ultimately destroying the government and institutions of the United States. It is absolutely in his interest to divert attention and blame from the terrorists so that they can continue their work.
Like hey man I mean, you have to make a video man, cause, I mean, that's how you turn like gossip into an accusation, I mean, that is as good as evidence.
I mean where would I be if I called it Loose Gossip? I can't spell innuendo without checking I mean it so I like don't like do that, and what would I call it like, pile of innuendoes? Man, like I mean my man Jason like he said that sounded like Italian suppositories, so like, no way, I mean, Loose Change, everybody knows what that is, I mean its like when you are in Seattle, and this kid with an Ipod, and new Rebocks says to you "got any loose change" and I mean you notice he's hangin out in front of the video arcade, not like the diner.
And so when you make a video, and like its not your video, but everybody else's stuff, I mean, you end up asking questions, like Where's the tail? and Where's the luggage, and since you didn't shoot it, you just lifted it, like, you know, Like maybe it was behind the guy who took the picture, or like maybe you only see 3 pictures of 200, or only 30 seconds of video when the guy shot hours, I mean, like the film guys who make films know that, but they don't teach you that at Friendly's
Man, I gotta go work on my image now - got that collar outside the collar thing goin' on I mean, it's exciting.
Conspiracy Smasher said...
Killtown?
Have you squirmed back under your rock? Questions have been asked of you. Do you have an answer?
"squirmed back under your rock", LOL!!!
You guys are funny!
I told you "nutbars" (just using your guy's type of language) that I joined SLC's little forum. Feel free to ask me questions there.
Show me evidence the plane was Flying straight. Everyone said the plane was behaving erratic. If you can't produce evidence it was flying straight then stop the lie.
To be fair, I think he was suggesting that if the aircraft had gone "straight down", and the wreckage had shot off in any given distance for 2 miles, then the angle would be very, very strange. Which is absolutely correct. Ofcourse, I have no clue where got the idea that the aircraft flew straight down and burried itself in the ground. When you start off with a flawed premise, it's easy to make logical conclusions which are still totaly wrong.
I told you "nutbars" (just using your guy's type of language) that I joined SLC's little forum. Feel free to ask me questions there.
...we aren't the nutbars, though.
When you start off with a flawed premise, it's easy to make logical conclusions which are still totaly wrong.
Yes, he doesn't get that the plane didn't go straight down.
Post a Comment
<< Home