This Is the Kind of Nonsense the Deniers Come Up With
Watch the video (it's only seven seconds long). Notice how the bridge appears to be moving in the background? Well, of course, it's just an artifact of the camera panning back at the same time as the helicopter doing the videotaping is moving to the viewer's left.
But that's not what the Deniers think. They see something very suspicious, possibly the smoking gun!
Of course, what they're really observing is a very common phenomenon that I first noticed as a child on long car trips. When we'd see a water tower in the distance, especially if there was a hill in between, it always seemed like the water tower was moving parallel to us. This is because the angle of view of something close to you changes more rapidly than the angle of view of something far away.
Update: I love one of the comments left on that YouTube video:
Maybe the sooper-nano-mini-nuklear thermite bomb was moving the bridge, or Larry Silverstein was "pulling it"... lo
posted by Pat @ 10:39 AM
11 comments
11 Comments:
Is this what these losers are basing their ideas on? That a camera panned back to film the WTC fires and the bridge "appears" to be moving?
Can someone tell me where such nutjobs have been? I have to tell you - I am scared shitless that I have been living with these psychos breathing the same air as me.
They truly need some help. Whew.
Once again...rediculous beyond words...but i am sure NESSIE will have the answer :)
The thing is they are going to keep "discovering" things like this for years, if not forever.
Thanks to these nutjobs I have lost nearly all my faith in humanity.
It's awfully sane in here without nessie piping up.
it's just an artifact of the camera panning back at the same time as the helicopter doing the videotaping is moving to the viewer's left.
I dunno about that observation. The towers keep their size and perspective while the bridge is changing position. If the angle of the building changed then you might be correct but doesn't look that way.
But who the hell cares? The buildings still collapses at near free fall speeds. Nothing changes THAT!
The buildings still collapses at near free fall speeds. Nothing changes THAT!
They have to fall at free-fall for it to matter at all.
would someone please their camcorder, go outside and perform the same trick, and then post it so Nessie can be convinced...lol.
would someone please their camcorder, go outside and perform the same trick, and then post it so Nessie can be convinced...lol.
Get on a chopper and do the same thing and I'll be convinced.
ya right...If you were convinced about anything said in here, or any prove provided you...it would be a first.
Hmm.. this seems to be merely an artifact of the common helicopter-mounted gyro-stabilized long-field zoom video camera shooting the buildings as the helicopter flies around the towers.. why isn't it just that simple?
Post a Comment
<< Home