Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Our Buddies at Ground Zero

Reading from left to right, here are Mark Roberts (Gravy), Kate from Debunk911Myths, Abby Scott, and Reality Bites (from the JREF forums.



Gravy's report on their day at Ground Zero on 9/11/06 is here. It's just a tad more sensible and articulate than "Treez" post below.

24 Comments:

At 13 September, 2006 15:35, Blogger zippychippy said...

Sorry, still think it's too soon to see all that smiling where they were.

 
At 13 September, 2006 16:54, Blogger Dog Town said...

Those are the truely beautiful people! Thanks for fighting the good fight inperson.

 
At 13 September, 2006 17:35, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

You are doing great work please keep up all of the hard work!!

Good Job!!

BTW Abby is very easy on the eyes!
:)

 
At 13 September, 2006 17:42, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

You guys are phenomenal. I am too old and too tired to do what you guys do, even online. Ah to be 10 years younger, and to be in NYC.

Keep it up. You guys rock.

TAM

 
At 13 September, 2006 19:55, Blogger James B. said...

Hey, nobody is allowed to sexually harass Abby on this blog. Well, except for me of course...

 
At 13 September, 2006 22:07, Blogger Dog Town said...

Hey, nobody is allowed to sexually harass Abby

I think he, or you, has to be her boss to do that! I don't see it.
Would be fun, though, huh?
/end bad attempt at humor, nanoo nanoo!

 
At 13 September, 2006 22:21, Blogger nes718 said...

How cute! Dubya youth :)

 
At 14 September, 2006 03:38, Blogger shawn said...

Dubya youth :)

I doubt any of them voted for the man, child.

 
At 14 September, 2006 11:39, Blogger nes718 said...

I doubt any of them voted for the man, child.

Don't matter if they voted for him or not. They are supporting his lies so that makes 'Red State' folks or as I accurately described Dubya Youth! :D

 
At 14 September, 2006 12:12, Blogger Alex said...

Just out of curiosity, what part of your body is the SS tatoo on?

 
At 14 September, 2006 13:02, Blogger shawn said...

Just out of curiosity, what part of your body is the SS tatoo on?

Dude, didn't you know? Hitler was a Zionist.

They are supporting his lies

Orwell loves you, baby.

 
At 14 September, 2006 17:32, Blogger nes718 said...

Dude, didn't you know? Hitler was a Zionist.

This is correct and the "SS" had Jews and half Jews within their ranks. They are the "Young Turks" of Germany.

 
At 14 September, 2006 17:33, Blogger nes718 said...

Just out of curiosity, what part of your body is the SS tatoo on?

I am not a Zionazi so I don't agree wiht the SS.

 
At 14 September, 2006 18:15, Blogger Alex said...

Yeah, right. Don't lie, we know that all of you KKK Kids have them!

"It's a well established fact!"

 
At 14 September, 2006 18:31, Blogger shawn said...

I am not a Zionazi so I don't agree wiht the SS.


bahahahahahah you get funnier with every post! Zionazi! hahahaha

Now you're getting things mixed up.

The SS were part of the NSDAP, the "Zionazis" are what idiots call Zionists (sorry, the Nazis weren't Zionists, no matter how badly you want that to be true).

(PS he has the tattoo in his armpit - that's where they got them.)

 
At 14 September, 2006 23:46, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

Not in the armpit but the inside of the bicep to be accurate. Many of them regretted getting that after the war, for obvious reasons.

But that is not the purpose of my comment. I wanted to give my congratulations for this very original activist campaign to torpedo the idiot "twufers" and ruin their retarded media spectacle.

This photo shows that people who have critical thinking skills are generally better looking and have better relations with the opposite sex than tinfoil hat-wearing morons, who are by stark contrast ugly and twisted looking people that prefer to play Dungeons and Dragons at home instead of going out to bars.

 
At 15 September, 2006 14:00, Blogger √ėyvind said...

Don't matter if they voted for him or not. They are supporting his lies so that makes [them] 'Red State' folks or as I accurately described Dubya Youth! :D

Surely you're not implying Dubya is red, as in socialist?

And yes, they support his "lies". But that doesn't mean they support him. I agree with Kim Jong-Il that evolution is a proven fact. I suppose that makes me a Kim Youth member, then?

Or a ibn Ladin-supporter - I agree with Usama when he says the theory of gravity is real.

I truly am evil. If you don't see me again, it's because I've decided to isolate myself as punishment for my support of the ideas of evil dictators and terrorists.

So long.

 
At 15 September, 2006 16:56, Blogger shawn said...

Many of them regretted getting that after the war

Eichmann was smart enough to get his removed.

Fortunately, he wasn't smart enough to escape the gallows.

 
At 16 September, 2006 05:54, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

You sound like you might not be from the US, Safe-Keeper. Red State refers to states that vote republican. As you may have heard we have the electoral college based on the majority vote in each state, basically. On election night, the states that go to the GOP are coded Red, and those for the Democrats are Blue.

 
At 17 September, 2006 08:52, Blogger m5 said...

Can any of you explain - why you and others like you find it so important to defend an elected body of government?

I find nothing in the constitution, the Federalist papers, etc. that call for citizens to come to the aid and comfort of their elected officials- when questioned by citizens.

In fact, as citizens we are called to do just the opposite. We were warned time and time again that govt. (including our own) is inherently corrupt. Govt.s have consistently used fear, patsies and other forms of trickery to deceive populations. One of their most efffective tools is whats called useful idiots - you guys possibly fit this category.

Smart kids such as yourselves who have some misguided belief that - it's your duty to protect the govt. against criticism and against films like Loose Change or the comments of Steven Jones.

Our govt. is quite competent and has massive bandwidth to address such issues - and are obligated to provide answers to a hungry population - who is being asked to sacrifice their sons and daughters in far away lands - while having to provide billions in dollars that could otherwise go to improving our standard of living...

We are at war, the govt. does not have time to deal with the peoples doubt, we are taking time away from terrorist is nonsense - just look at the litany of senseless issues the govt. is focused on- such as the Congresssional baseball/steroid hearings.

Sure there may be inaccuracies and/or misinfo in Loose Change - further there are many other videos, documentaries that go beyond the physical mechanics of 9-11.

I'd like the govt. to provide the public with the studies that disprove Steven Jones assertion of thermite. Claims that he is a nut or crazy does not cut it - show me the evidence that he is incorrect and/or his analysis is incorrect. If he is out of his field of study, etc..it should be that much easier to disprove his hypothesis. Other than screams that the scholars are crazy - I see no empirical evidence to disprove their claims....Further I am curious as to why you guys ignore the wealth of other information - primarily from insiders (Major Michael McCormick) and other professionals who disagree with the govts assertions....Where is your crittical analysis of the official story (our patriotic duty is to closely examine the claims of our elected officials/public servants) - this "you have to take our word on this one" is for the birds....

 
At 17 September, 2006 14:07, Blogger shawn said...

Smart kids such as yourselves who have some misguided belief that - it's your duty to protect the govt. against criticism and against films like Loose Change or the comments of Steven Jones.

Our belief is that the truth deserves to be defended, it has nothing to do with the government.

Bush thinks creationism should be taught in schools, but I attack creationism every chance I get.

It's about truth, numbskull, not defense of the government.

 
At 18 September, 2006 19:10, Blogger M8 said...

how do you know you are defending the truth? you cant be serious.

and numbskull? come on.

 
At 18 September, 2006 20:15, Blogger M8 said...

And yes - your position is a de facto defense of the govt's position. how can you defend the truth - when I propose to you that you don't know what the truth is. A position in support of the govt. (in particular, when it comes to matters of war) has historically proven to be a fools position.

If we examined govt. actions from a historical perspective - it's a long twisted history of lies and deceipt.

Case and point, many Americans debate and argue about Vietnam - while the LBJ tapes in no uncertain terms describes the fake Gulf of Tonkin Affair that cost 50K young American lives, the deaths of over 2mil Vietnemes - while billions of dollars were transferred from the middle class to a select class of corporation/private entities in the military sector.

How about BCCI? What a scandal that was - involving many members of the current administration (dem and repub) Saudis, etc....

The list goes on and on and on. If I were a gambling man you, in your alleged quest for truth have sided with interesting bedfellows.

I'm sure they love you to death - folks like many of you are typically called useful idiots...Govts. depend on people like you. Clappin' loud, waving your flag...not really giving a hoot about the troops who made it to the VA or are out of the service strung out have out of their minds.

You appear to have drank the Kool Aide and believe you are performing some noble duty to find the truth - when in reality - if you and you buddies are wrong - you are complicit in failing in your Constitutional duty to question and distrust your govt. - along w/the fact that folks like you are flabbergasted when you find yourselves out in the cold like everyone else. How soon we forget the Enrons..

If the Loose Changes guys are wrong - they go blowing in the wind. If you guys are wrong (you are trying to defend the govt. on an amazing number of points and issues) - wow -

So again, what truth are you seeking? What is the possible gain? The odds that you are correct - based on an extended/short history appear quite remote.

Wow someone on this blog actually said "Thanks for fighting the good fight"

 
At 18 September, 2006 23:10, Blogger mbats said...

how can you defend the truth - when I propose to you that you don't know what the truth is.

The only reason anyone is not sure about the truth of this is because they are ignoring the mass of witness testimony and evidence and are focusing on the anamolies (which usually have more reasonable explanations than a gov't conspiracy).

A position in support of the govt. (in particular, when it comes to matters of war) has historically proven to be a fools position.

So the government's decision to get involved in WWII was a foolish idea?!?

you are complicit in failing in your Constitutional duty to question and distrust your govt.

Sure, I've come to the same conclusions as the government - but it hasn't been a matter of trust. I still trust the government as far as I can throw it (nope - still can't even lift it). I wouldn't have learned as much as I have about 9/11 without questioning the government story - but no matter how much I dislike them, most of their story pans out.

If you guys are wrong (you are trying to defend the govt. on an amazing number of points and issues) - wow -

I can't speak for everybody, but I'm open to the possibility of being wrong - I just need solid, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evedience to disprove what is, from my armchair analysis, a soild case that 19 guys with foreign backing pulled this off. If you can provide that, I'm all for finding a theory that incorporates your new evidence that still makes sense with all the other evidence.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home