Sunday, June 25, 2006

Inside the Conspiracy HQ



(Click on picture to expand to readable size).

Hat Tip: SondraK via JREF forums. Cartoon by Filibuster Cartoons.

35 Comments:

At 25 June, 2006 11:09, Blogger nesNYC said...

Pretty accurate except the part about hiring people to fly the drones. Everybody knows that Global Hawk did that..

And in other news, Zionist Silverstein buys the Sears Towers!

What we do know about the Sears Tower is that it already might have been rigged since a few Israelis were arrested video taping it after 9/11.

 
At 25 June, 2006 11:46, Blogger Falco98 said...

/killfile nester

in other news...
www.myspace.com/screwloosechange

 
At 25 June, 2006 11:54, Blogger Richard said...

Are you trying to tell us that a Global Hawk flew the planes or that they were remote controlled? As for the Sears Tower article I didn't see Israelis mentioned once only people of Middle Eastern desent. As for Silverstein well that website has this to say about their motives...

"Our intention was to bring together everything about the beautiful city of al-Basrah – its history, culture, heritage, and art.
But the invasion of Iraq by the international terrorist mafia gangs compelled us to focus on what was more important in this critical period than the history of our Arab nation and our beloved country, namely the defense of Iraq. Our task then became to gather together and present all the news and facts – written articles, video clips, and sound recordings – in both Arabic and English – that expose the occupation and shed light on its crimes and its true aims."


Not exactly an unbiases source.

 
At 25 June, 2006 11:55, Blogger shawn said...

hahaha nesnyc you realize a global hawk is far too small to create the damage at the Pentagon and that nobody saw anything but a commercial airliner?

Oh wait, you're an idiot.

 
At 25 June, 2006 12:17, Blogger James B. said...

Size issue aside, a Global Hawk looks about as much like a 767 as a Honda Scooter looks like a Lamboughini Murcielago.

Although it is a better theory than a Javelin missile...

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:12, Blogger jackhanyes said...

I sometime agree with nesync, but i disagree about the global hawk or a cruise missle.

One piece many CT'er miss and OS'er don't know is the damage done to the trailers outside of the building.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:14, Blogger nesNYC said...

As for the Sears Tower article I didn't see Israelis mentioned once only people of Middle Eastern desent.

Oh yeah... How many Arabs are named "Moshe?" LOL!!!

The man, who later identified himself as Moshe Elmakias, 30, denied that he did anything and fled the scene, heading west on West Ridge Pike, according to police.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:17, Blogger jackhanyes said...

The flight path and other planes in the area opens the door to plane switching (like the plan outlined in the northwood documents), the tail number being seen later, and no recording of the flights.

hey james. do a entry about the tail numbers. I dare ya.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:18, Blogger nesNYC said...

Are you trying to tell us that a Global Hawk flew the planes or that they were remote controlled?

No, I'm trying to make the situation "fit" the silly cartoon :D

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:20, Blogger nesNYC said...

in other news...
www.myspace.com/screwloosechange


Debunked!

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:22, Blogger nesNYC said...

Remote controlled planes, FYI. All speculation, but interesting never the less.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:41, Blogger James B. said...

hey james. do a entry about the tail numbers. I dare ya.


It was a typo by some guy who was 1 number off writing down a tail number. That is like saying if a cop wrote my license number down wrong, that proves I don't exist. I was thinking of doing a post on it once, but it was too silly and minor a point.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:42, Blogger default.xbe said...

Oh yeah... How many Arabs are named "Moshe?" LOL!!!

he identified himself as moshe, are we certain he gave his real name?

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:43, Blogger shawn said...

The flight path and other planes in the area opens the door to plane switching

So you're one of those morons that think they didn't crash the actual planes, but for some ludicrous reason, switched them with other planes and crashed those? What happened to the goddamn passengers? They in on it too?

hey james. do a entry about the tail numbers. I dare ya.

Except they reuse tail numbers. If you actually read the Loose Change Reader's Guide you'd know that.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:51, Blogger nesNYC said...

he identified himself as moshe, are we certain he gave his real name?

Look again:

The man, ****who later identified*** himself as Moshe Elmakias, 30, denied that he did anything and fled the scene, heading west on West Ridge Pike, according to police.

"Later identified" sounds conclusive to me. Otherwise, I think the article would have said so and the police certainly would have held him until his real identity was verified.

But now ask yourself, if these were Arab "Al Qaeda" wouldn't it be headling news? I mean, look at th ring who were recently set up by and FBI informant (yet again) in connection with a new "Al Qaeda" like the recent bombing plot in Miami?

Only time suspects get caught with the goods and it doesn't make headlines is when they are Zionist Mossad/Israelis.

Did you ever hear about the Israeli bombing plot in Mexico? Just more of the same.

 
At 25 June, 2006 13:54, Blogger default.xbe said...

he identified himself, i can identify myself as prince charles, but that doesnt necessarily make it true

 
At 25 June, 2006 14:01, Blogger nesNYC said...

he identified himself, i can identify myself as prince charles, but that doesnt necessarily make it true

Well, look at the other names, do they sound Arabic? If Middle Eastern and not Arabic, what else would they be? Process of elmination.

Also, they are related to "Moving Systems Incorporated", doesn't that name ring a bell? It does to me!

 
At 25 June, 2006 14:24, Blogger shawn said...

Arabs wanting to discredit Jews? Perish the thought.

 
At 25 June, 2006 14:27, Blogger Falco98 said...

Debunked!

Huh?
like so many here keep reminding you: just saying it over and over won't make it true.

 
At 25 June, 2006 15:05, Blogger Falco98 said...

Debunked!

On second thought:
why would you link me to a thread (which also links to another thread), which in both cases the OS'ers are thoroughly handing you guys your asses?

 
At 25 June, 2006 15:32, Blogger shawn said...

Wow the people in that thread are stupid as hell. They don't understand that the buildings aren't used to holding collapsed floors up, so that each floor would collapse under the weight and momentum of the previous.

They think debris falling away from the building is evidence of explosions (especially since you don't collapse a building from the top-down).

 
At 25 June, 2006 15:46, Blogger nesNYC said...

Huh?
like so many here keep reminding you: just saying it over and over won't make it true.


Absolutley. Hold that thought when thinking of Bin Laden.

 
At 25 June, 2006 15:47, Blogger nesNYC said...

so that each floor would collapse under the weight and momentum of the previous.

That's called the "pancake" theory and FEMA says it happened but NIST says it didn't, so what is it? CD naturally.

 
At 25 June, 2006 15:55, Blogger default.xbe said...

no, if it wasnt pancake collapse it was obviously space aliens

 
At 25 June, 2006 16:27, Blogger shawn said...

Absolutley. Hold that thought when thinking of Bin Laden.

You don't get it. There's evidence he did it. There's no evidence he's a CIA agent. It's not the same line of thinking.

says it didn't, so what is it? CD naturally.

First off, you're assuming they're both wrong, which isn't the case. If someone said JFK was shot but another said he wasn't, that doesn't mean some unrelated third option (false dilemma fallacy) is the only chose.

 
At 25 June, 2006 16:27, Blogger shawn said...

choice*

 
At 26 June, 2006 00:49, Blogger jackhanyes said...

It was a typo by some guy who was 1 number off writing down a tail number. That is like saying if a cop wrote my license number down wrong, that proves I don't exist. I was thinking of doing a post on it once, but it was too silly and minor a point.

That not even what I'm talking about!

 
At 26 June, 2006 00:52, Blogger jackhanyes said...

You don't get it. There's evidence he did it.

And you don't get, if there was evidence he did it, the FBI would indict him! But there is no hard evidence!

 
At 26 June, 2006 08:13, Blogger shawn said...

And you don't get, if there was evidence he did it, the FBI would indict him! But there is no hard evidence!

The FBI doesn't indict him. A grand jury does.

 
At 26 June, 2006 10:06, Blogger James B. said...

Oh please, we only have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan trying to KILL him. Oh, we had better indict him to show him we are serious!

 
At 26 June, 2006 20:03, Blogger jackhanyes said...

Oh please, we only have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan trying to KILL him.

Bull shit. We have 20K troop to secure a pipeline.

What you should be asking is why the FBI lack hard evdience to indict him and we invaded a country to kill the boogy man.

 
At 26 June, 2006 20:10, Blogger shawn said...

Bull shit. We have 20K troop to secure a pipeline.

You've been watching Michael Moore too much. Clinton era project.

What you should be asking is
why the FBI lack hard evdience to indict him and we invaded a country to kill the boogy man.


Stop being a fucking idiot and assuming all evidence is hard evidence. I already explained how faulty your argument is.

 
At 26 June, 2006 20:22, Blogger Alex said...

Maybe you can show me this pipeline? I'm sure there's lots of photographs and videos. Perhaps some reputable articles? A detailed report on the project's status and estimated completion date?

Weird that none of my buddies report seing it while out patrolling.

 
At 26 June, 2006 20:28, Blogger James B. said...

We have 20K troop to secure a pipeline.


Having spent some time in the area, and with a whole lot of friends there now, I can say for certain, "There ain't no pipeline there"

 
At 26 June, 2006 21:13, Blogger shawn said...

They're obviously using hologram technology to make it seem like empty desert when there's actually a pipeline there.

Ask Ted Rall, he knows.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home