Inside the Conspiracy HQ
(Click on picture to expand to readable size).
Hat Tip: SondraK via JREF forums. Cartoon by Filibuster Cartoons.
posted by Pat @ 8:57 AM
27 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Sunday, June 25, 2006
(Click on picture to expand to readable size).
Hat Tip: SondraK via JREF forums. Cartoon by Filibuster Cartoons.
Previous Posts
- More On Those Shoulder Launched Cruise Missiles
- An Open Letter to Dylan Avery
- More 9/11 "Truth" Movement Deceptions
- Sell, Sell, Sell
- Does Adam Sandler Know?
- Towards a Taxonomy of the CT Class
- Korey Rowe Supports Threatening Lawyers, Exaggerat...
- The Loosers Have Found Their Messiah
- Lefty Blogger Sees Through Loose Change
- Open Mike Night at Screw Loose Change
View My Stats
Allies:
27 Comments:
Pretty accurate except the part about hiring people to fly the drones. Everybody knows that Global Hawk did that..
And in other news, Zionist Silverstein buys the Sears Towers!
What we do know about the Sears Tower is that it already might have been rigged since a few Israelis were arrested video taping it after 9/11.
/killfile nester
in other news...
www.myspace.com/screwloosechange
Are you trying to tell us that a Global Hawk flew the planes or that they were remote controlled? As for the Sears Tower article I didn't see Israelis mentioned once only people of Middle Eastern desent. As for Silverstein well that website has this to say about their motives...
"Our intention was to bring together everything about the beautiful city of al-Basrah – its history, culture, heritage, and art.
But the invasion of Iraq by the international terrorist mafia gangs compelled us to focus on what was more important in this critical period than the history of our Arab nation and our beloved country, namely the defense of Iraq. Our task then became to gather together and present all the news and facts – written articles, video clips, and sound recordings – in both Arabic and English – that expose the occupation and shed light on its crimes and its true aims."
Not exactly an unbiases source.
hahaha nesnyc you realize a global hawk is far too small to create the damage at the Pentagon and that nobody saw anything but a commercial airliner?
Oh wait, you're an idiot.
Size issue aside, a Global Hawk looks about as much like a 767 as a Honda Scooter looks like a Lamboughini Murcielago.
Although it is a better theory than a Javelin missile...
As for the Sears Tower article I didn't see Israelis mentioned once only people of Middle Eastern desent.
Oh yeah... How many Arabs are named "Moshe?" LOL!!!
The man, who later identified himself as Moshe Elmakias, 30, denied that he did anything and fled the scene, heading west on West Ridge Pike, according to police.
Are you trying to tell us that a Global Hawk flew the planes or that they were remote controlled?
No, I'm trying to make the situation "fit" the silly cartoon :D
in other news...
www.myspace.com/screwloosechange
Debunked!
Remote controlled planes, FYI. All speculation, but interesting never the less.
hey james. do a entry about the tail numbers. I dare ya.
It was a typo by some guy who was 1 number off writing down a tail number. That is like saying if a cop wrote my license number down wrong, that proves I don't exist. I was thinking of doing a post on it once, but it was too silly and minor a point.
The flight path and other planes in the area opens the door to plane switching
So you're one of those morons that think they didn't crash the actual planes, but for some ludicrous reason, switched them with other planes and crashed those? What happened to the goddamn passengers? They in on it too?
hey james. do a entry about the tail numbers. I dare ya.
Except they reuse tail numbers. If you actually read the Loose Change Reader's Guide you'd know that.
he identified himself as moshe, are we certain he gave his real name?
Look again:
The man, ****who later identified*** himself as Moshe Elmakias, 30, denied that he did anything and fled the scene, heading west on West Ridge Pike, according to police.
"Later identified" sounds conclusive to me. Otherwise, I think the article would have said so and the police certainly would have held him until his real identity was verified.
But now ask yourself, if these were Arab "Al Qaeda" wouldn't it be headling news? I mean, look at th ring who were recently set up by and FBI informant (yet again) in connection with a new "Al Qaeda" like the recent bombing plot in Miami?
Only time suspects get caught with the goods and it doesn't make headlines is when they are Zionist Mossad/Israelis.
Did you ever hear about the Israeli bombing plot in Mexico? Just more of the same.
he identified himself, i can identify myself as prince charles, but that doesnt necessarily make it true
Well, look at the other names, do they sound Arabic? If Middle Eastern and not Arabic, what else would they be? Process of elmination.
Also, they are related to "Moving Systems Incorporated", doesn't that name ring a bell? It does to me!
Arabs wanting to discredit Jews? Perish the thought.
Debunked!
Huh?
like so many here keep reminding you: just saying it over and over won't make it true.
Debunked!
On second thought:
why would you link me to a thread (which also links to another thread), which in both cases the OS'ers are thoroughly handing you guys your asses?
Wow the people in that thread are stupid as hell. They don't understand that the buildings aren't used to holding collapsed floors up, so that each floor would collapse under the weight and momentum of the previous.
They think debris falling away from the building is evidence of explosions (especially since you don't collapse a building from the top-down).
Huh?
like so many here keep reminding you: just saying it over and over won't make it true.
Absolutley. Hold that thought when thinking of Bin Laden.
so that each floor would collapse under the weight and momentum of the previous.
That's called the "pancake" theory and FEMA says it happened but NIST says it didn't, so what is it? CD naturally.
Absolutley. Hold that thought when thinking of Bin Laden.
You don't get it. There's evidence he did it. There's no evidence he's a CIA agent. It's not the same line of thinking.
says it didn't, so what is it? CD naturally.
First off, you're assuming they're both wrong, which isn't the case. If someone said JFK was shot but another said he wasn't, that doesn't mean some unrelated third option (false dilemma fallacy) is the only chose.
choice*
And you don't get, if there was evidence he did it, the FBI would indict him! But there is no hard evidence!
The FBI doesn't indict him. A grand jury does.
Oh please, we only have 20,000 troops in Afghanistan trying to KILL him. Oh, we had better indict him to show him we are serious!
Bull shit. We have 20K troop to secure a pipeline.
You've been watching Michael Moore too much. Clinton era project.
What you should be asking is
why the FBI lack hard evdience to indict him and we invaded a country to kill the boogy man.
Stop being a fucking idiot and assuming all evidence is hard evidence. I already explained how faulty your argument is.
Maybe you can show me this pipeline? I'm sure there's lots of photographs and videos. Perhaps some reputable articles? A detailed report on the project's status and estimated completion date?
Weird that none of my buddies report seing it while out patrolling.
We have 20K troop to secure a pipeline.
Having spent some time in the area, and with a whole lot of friends there now, I can say for certain, "There ain't no pipeline there"
They're obviously using hologram technology to make it seem like empty desert when there's actually a pipeline there.
Ask Ted Rall, he knows.
Post a Comment
<< Home