Bruce Willis Not a CT Nutjob
Michael Yon e-mails, as posted on Hot Air:
Bruce got back to me this morning saying the press has misconstrued his statements and that this is untrue. Bruce said in part, “…the Linklater statements have been completely misconstrued, as usual by the media.”Yippee ki yay...
[I]t’s clear that some media are just attaching Bruce’s name to gain traction. I will not talk about private communications so will keep this very brief by saying I know Bruce’s support for the troops is ongoing and, if anything, increasing. Bruce does not believe this conspiracy theory.
posted by James B. @ 9:17 PM
18 comments
18 Comments:
This was the guy who put a 2 million dollar hit out on Saddam Hussein and when the US Army bagged the bastard he tried to pay out.
The idea that he could be so easily swayed when his attitude goes so totally against the grain in trendy-lefty hollywood is itself absurd.
Hey alright, continue with the immature name calling!
Question for OCTs, this has got me perplexed about the Shanksville crash:
Why was just the inside of the crater burned and that small section of forest burned, but nothing immediately outside of the crater's rim and nothing between the crater and the burnt forest section?
How did this fireball jump up and over the service road to burn the forest, but nothing else?
Also, why did the fireball's direction conflict with the path of the alleged plane?
See here for diagram.
Also, why did the fireball's direction conflict with the path of the alleged plane?
You do know the word "alleged" is only used when something is in question before a court case?
I'm pretty sure there was a court case that had Flight 93 crashing into the field. Stop being retarded.
Like, Hey man, I mean, THEY got to him.
Just like they got to the Parliment thing in England.
He's got to be in on it.
Or worse, that's not realy Bruce Willis, it's like somebody with the same name.
Why would the government hijack a plane, make it vanish, then bulldoze the "crash" site and plant fake wreckage, as opposed to, say, just CRASHING THE FUCKING PLANE?
Because that is a rule of conspiracy theorists, the conspirators always do things in the most elaborate and complicated way possible, thus giving the truthseekers the opportunity to unveil their dasterdly plans. It is really quite sporting.
the conspirators always do things in the most elaborate and complicated way possible...
It's true. I commute from midtown to downtown by taking a train to Newark Airport, flying to one of a predetermined number of small midwestern cities, flying back into LaGuardia and then taking a cab downtown. I do this just in case I have to do something conspiracy-y later that day.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
A better question is why must the conspirators bother crashing that plane in a field when they could hit a building and cause more death?
I think the CT explanation, such that it is, is that Bushco needed a heroic story to unite the country for war, and the "Let's roll" meme was what they came up with.
Yeah, I know.
It's true. I commute from midtown to downtown by taking a train to Newark Airport, flying to one of a predetermined number of small midwestern cities, flying back into LaGuardia and then taking a cab downtown,
Like, hey man, you too?
CHF said...killtown, this has got me perplexed about the Shanksville crash:
Nice side-step of my question!
debunking911 said...
1) What the fuck is there to burn on a fucking road? What??? Gravel?
2) Sorry, but you really are stupid.
1) I'll try to make this as simple as possible:
Crater, grass, road, grass, forest.
Was that easy enough?
2) That's funny, I think the same way about you!
Please explain. There was a plane. There was ground. They planned on telling people the plane crashed into the ground. And they had to get rid of the plane somehow.
You are telling me that it makes perfect sense to you that the conspirators then decided to make the plane disappear and then go dig a hole and scatter debris around while torching a few trees without anyone noticing.
Please explain to me how this makes sense to you.
decided to make the plane disappear and then go dig a hole and scatter debris around while torching a few trees without anyone noticing.
It gets better. Having decided to do all that, they then torched the exact wrong number of trees such that it is apparent to a guy on the internet that the whole thing was a frameup.
You'd think that with all the money he's rumored to have Osama could afford better minions.
I dunno...maybe living in little old canada has me sheltered, but I am 35 years old, and I have never seen an explosion in person. I am not an expert in demolition, or explosion sites, or crash sites, so I couldn't begin to answe Killtown's questions...but I am sure most of the people at the crash site had that kind of expetese, yet none of them fild complaints about how extrordinarily odd the crash site was compared to others.
Apathoid:
I strongly believe that the debunkers are too easily drawn into name calling. We shouldn't get dragged down. What would you think of someone who argues with lunatics at the asylum?
Having said that, in my years debunking 9.11 conspiracies, those killtown quotes are among the mind numbingly dumbest things I have ever read. I almost feel guilty, like I made fun of a kid and then realised he was retarted.
Both of the "planes" happened to impact the WTC without its wing's extending past the corners of the building. If this did happen, it would have proved if it were some kind of real plane or not because the over extending wing would have sheered off and kept traveling forward.
That idea of KT's is one (of countless) that bother me. The engines, the landing gear, the passengers remains.... None of them implicate an actual plane in his mind.
... But shorn-off wing tips would.
Because as we all know.... You can plant landing gear. You can plant mangled jet engines. You can even fake a person's DNA.
But shorn-off wing tips? They're impossible to plant.
That's right... not too much wreckage, not too little wreckage, we want the wreckage to be exactly the right amount, an amount which any layman would obviously know from instinct.
Post a Comment
<< Home