A Squirrel Interviews a Nut
Morgan Reynolds, who's still associating with Holocaust Denier and MIT Doctoral Candidate Rick Rajter, interviews a fellow "no-planer".
Q: Why is the video phony?
A: The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!
Q: Why would the establishment elite pull off a phony video?
A: The video had to be phony because the Illuminati, or whatever we want to call them, had to eliminate all possibilities of a foul up. They needed the hijacking scam to implicate the Muslims, but they couldn’t afford any risk. They had to Keep-It-Simple-Stupid so they faked the crashes.
posted by Pat @ 10:17 AM
11 comments
11 Comments:
I read the Reynolds and am speech less. the outer walls were AL clad steel, no concrete and were like a slicer. Nothing like this have ever happened before so the whaks can say anything they want, hel in a hurricane 120mph winds can put a 2x4 thru a palm tree, what are the forces in a 300k# plane at 500mph?
I wonder how many crashes Reynlods has investigated?
That guys sounds nuttier than a Payday candy bar!
Keep it simple? Can anyone imagine what the conspiracy would have looked like if someone actually tried to form all their bizarre suggestions into one timeline and one theory?
Since the nutters claim that the "video" (forget the live feeds showing the same thing) of 9/11 is faked, I think we can safely say that the entire Clinton administration was faked. How else to explain a hillbilly moron from Arkansas stealing the White House and then serving 2 terms? How else to explain a President lying under oath and having his whole party defend him? How else to explain Warren Christopher's eyebrows?
My God! It has to have been a fake. My theory is that some man named Nervis Hallaylia actually was President during that period. He was a semi-good leader, but that time when he dropped his frankfurter in the Key Lime pie on President's Day was sure hilarious.
[See how easy it is to cook up complete nonsense? The 9/11 Deniers are so good at it, it is frightening! Because they mean what they say! It is not an act!]
You guys should really get the correct facts on the holyco$t.
You're presenting the Institute for Historical Review as an accurate source of information on the Holocaust?
Well, yes. Did you read, follow and verify their sources? Most come right from the horses mouths’. Don't tell me you simply saw the website and got all afraid to check the facts? You might as well crawl under a rock and keep tuned into the cnnabcnbccbsfox news network.
BTW, IHR is far more reputable than the terrorist group the ADL who has firebombed them.
"Don't tell me you simply saw the website and got all afraid to check the facts?"
I guess. At the same time, I'm not going to slam my fingers in a door to find out if it hurts.
Well, yes. Did you read, follow and verify their sources?
I just finished reading Denying History, which completely destroys their arguments and shows they don't accurately quote their own sources.
Owned, nessie, owned.
ADL never fire-bombed the IHR. I believe you are thinking of JDL.
Yup, again nesnyc got his facts wrong. The JDL was most likely responsible for the firebombing.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hey, nessie, don't you love how the IHR ignores the Nazis actually admitting they committed the Holocaust? Even if you ignore the camps (which I'm sure you do following the IHR's non-evidence and horribly flawed logic), you have the Einsatzgruppen reporting on 500,000 killed in less than a year.
There are two reasons to deny the Holocaust (or using their incorrect terminology, "revise"): antisemitism or political (whether trying to attack Israel/the Allies or show Germany was innocent of any wrongdoing).
Post a Comment
<< Home