Friday, September 01, 2006

Evidence? We Don't Need No Stinking Evidence!

This is actually one of the larger blogs that I've seen recently that mentions Loose Change in a positive light. As we have discussed in the past, the lefty gatekeepers have been doing a pretty good job of keeping the lid on 9-11 Deniers.

Check out that post for an amusing email exchange with a reporter who's not buying 9-11 Denial. The reporter keeps asking for evidence, and Tome Paine responds with, well, flowery language:

If you're looking for a "smoking gun," you're being too myopic and in denial about who these people really are. Much has been destroyed or is being kept from the public under the "national security" label and virtually everything they say we know to be a lie.

As such, we are able to see correlations in what's missing, what's hidden, what's been destroyed, what's been altered, who's been excluded, who was tipped off, who was protected, who was sent away, who blocked information, how the investigation was controlled, and the huge black hole is the MSM spin such that, when coupled with the huge body of 9/11 truth movement research out there (including Ruppert's), that metaview is the evidence.

Moreover, we see coherence between actions, inactions, control, lack of control, a chain of command across numerous agencies, war games, rehearsals, and a huge list documenting unprecedented deception, lies, as well a recurring historical record of sending resources away from impending crises, or of providing insufficient resources, in order to engender chaos to fulfill loathsome goals through destruction and violence: 2000 & 2004 election fraud; 9/11; Iraq; Katrina.

Need I say more?


No, indeed, Tom, nothing more need be said. You have no evidence.

19 Comments:

At 01 September, 2006 12:52, Blogger rocketdoodle said...

No evidence?

THEY'VE GOT A METAVIEW.

Holy crap, man. Focus.

 
At 01 September, 2006 13:51, Blogger Pat said...

Rob if you'd like to take it on, I'd be happy to post it here or link it. Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood did a debunking of Jones, but they're rather nutty themselves, so I'm not convinced it's definitive.

 
At 01 September, 2006 13:54, Blogger AbrashTX said...

Rob, I think many individuals have taken stabs at parts of Jones's, ahem, "work." Debunking911.com has some useful stuff, and ScrewLooseChange recently had a link to this guy:
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm

I think there's a page at NIST that deals with some of it as well. It's so easy to churn out drivel, but it takes time to examine and rebut, even though the errors are obvious. My husband worked in construction for years and Jones' stuff puts him in hysterics.

 
At 01 September, 2006 13:55, Blogger nes718 said...

No, indeed, Tom, nothing more need be said. You have no evidence.

Same vapors NIST is working from so it's up to the eye of the beholder. In this case, the most savvy and critical of the thinkers get kudos for seeing past the Government lies and deceptions.

 
At 01 September, 2006 14:04, Blogger Scott said...

i'm about as "lefty" as you can get without bein' a commie and i still think the deniers are all pretty insane.

 
At 01 September, 2006 15:55, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

asking NESSIE for real evidence is like asking Iran to stop its Nuclear Enrichment program...it aint gonna happen.

Luckily the world community can deal with Iran...we unfortunately, have to deal with NESSIE ourselves.

:)

 
At 01 September, 2006 18:20, Blogger nes718 said...

so what evidence do you have that you are the "right" beholder and we are wrong?

Who benefited? That's always the perpetrator of the crime. How many billions have been made off of 9/11 by the US Military establishment and how much destruction has been created in its name?

But What I don't understand is how the "Islamists" could have any kind of benefit from pulling off something like 9/11. It is much more logical that they create terror at their political enemies like taking out heads of state then civilians. The kind of attack that 9/11 was simply wasn't tactical in any sense of the word. No so called "terrorist" attacks are because they historically bring the establishment down the throats of the terrorists. "Terror" doesn't make any sense in that capacity.

Now, if a government wants to wage wars against others and wants to clamp down at home and create a climate of fear and control amongst its citizens, then that is the only logical purpose of any "terror" attack.

Historically, that's how the game is played. Today is no different.

 
At 01 September, 2006 18:54, Blogger shawn said...

Who benefited? That's always the perpetrator of the crime.

Damn, he utters a falsehood right off the bat.

By his logic we should never have trials, if someone gets inusrance money from a murdered (or even killed in an accident) spouse or other relation they must have snuffed them out.

It is much more logical that they create terror at their political enemies like taking out heads of state then civilians.

Because religious violence is totally logical. It's quite hard to get ahold of the highest folks in American power, plus you think assassinating Bush would've been anywhere near as powerful as 9/11? If you think so, then par for the course in your idiot world.

No so called "terrorist" attacks are because they historically bring the establishment down the throats of the terrorists.

What are you talking about? The Tamil Tigers use the most terror on Earth and they have control of the north of Sri Lanka (what they consider their land).

Plus Islamists are able to keep fighting because they have no state.

Historically, that's how the game is played.

Well only if someone ignores the entirety of history.

 
At 01 September, 2006 19:28, Blogger shawn said...

- (theory) Catapulting the various islamic extremists already in western countries to start preaching or converting.

I think this one is pretty much fact.

 
At 01 September, 2006 20:27, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

MArkyX:

You forgot instant place in heaven from Martyrdom...

 
At 01 September, 2006 20:58, Blogger shawn said...

You forgot instant place in heaven from Martyrdom...

Well really, just out of reach of Paradise.

 
At 01 September, 2006 22:58, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

Who benefited? That's always the perpetrator of the crime.

Nesnyc was behind 9-11.

It's pretty obvious when you think about. People kill for purely emotional reasons all the time. Nesnycs fellow racial supremacists are notorious for burning black churches just because it meakes them feel better.

In the run up to World War 2, Nesnycs spiritual predecessors went apeshit destroying jewish owned shops and business. There were so many broken windows throughout germany that they called it "night of crystal" or "kristallnacht".

Nesnycs fellow travellers were notorious for inflicting atrocities upon themselves to further thier agenda. Nesnycs people burned down the reichstag and then blamed it on the jews. They blow up thier own outposts along the polish frontier and blamed it on poland.

For the last 60 years Nesnyc and his ilk have had nothing but bad publicity, hated and reviled everywhere they go. It's only natural that they'd want to lash out at society. But rather than do it openly, they had to do it on the sly lest they get thier asses kicked again and get wiped out permanently.

Given what we know of Nesnyc himself, the history of his movement and the principle of cui bono it is painfully clear that to vent his rage, to take the heat of the white supremacist movement and create a motive for another spastic convuslion of anti-semitic violence, nesnyc deliberately and with malice aforethought engineered the murder of 3,000 innocent americans.

And you all saw him confess right here.

 
At 02 September, 2006 07:43, Blogger nes718 said...

Nesnycs spiritual predecessors went apeshit destroying jewish owned shops and business.

This is factually incorrect. The Nazi part was heavily infiltrated by young Zionist Jews determined to clear Europe of its traditionalist Jewish populations and transfer those sympathetic to the Zionist cause over to Palestine and to create their Zionist State.

Accordingly, because of mandatory Zionist expansion, we have 9/11 orchestrated by them and only to the real benefit of the Zionist regime. Their proxy, the US military, also is enjoying the fruits that 9/11 bore. By way of deception.

 
At 02 September, 2006 08:04, Blogger shawn said...

The Nazi part was heavily infiltrated by young Zionist Jews determined to clear Europe of its traditionalist Jewish populations and transfer those sympathetic to the Zionist cause over to Palestine and to create their Zionist State.


Wrong again.

 
At 02 September, 2006 10:14, Blogger Alex said...

Accordingly, because of mandatory Zionist expansion, we have 9/11 orchestrated by them and only to the real benefit of the Zionist regime. Their proxy, the US military, also is enjoying the fruits that 9/11 bore. By way of deception.

Shut your cock-holster you fucking murderer. I'm with SOT on this one. You should be prosectued for war crimes. Or hung from a street-light. Whichever comes first.

 
At 02 September, 2006 13:18, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Alex...

as much as I truely do appreciate the imaginitive explitives, Pat and James have asked us to refrain from so much cussing.

"Cock Holster" is absolutely classic...

 
At 02 September, 2006 13:43, Blogger Alex said...

Yeah, yeah, I know. Our new kindler, gentler army also keeps telling me that I can't swear so much, but it's ingrained by now. Especially when I'm confronted with such rabbid stupidity. All I can promise is that I'll try to minimize my usage of vulgarity as much as possible. It helps being reminded about it too, so thanks :)

 
At 02 September, 2006 15:11, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

This is factually incorrect. The Nazi part was heavily infiltrated by young Zionist Jews determined to clear Europe of its traditionalist Jewish populations and transfer those sympathetic to the Zionist cause over to Palestine and to create their Zionist State.

You are the miost violently stupid person I have ever met. Every word that drools off your lips is a murderous assault upon thought and reason.

 
At 04 September, 2006 03:44, Blogger Pepik said...

Ignore the attention seeking troll.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home