The No-Planers Go Disco
This is considered evidence on the No-Planer side:
Hey, man, I'm convinced. Convinced that you guys are all nuts!
posted by Pat @ 6:12 PM
14 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Monday, September 18, 2006
Hey, man, I'm convinced. Convinced that you guys are all nuts!
Previous Posts
- Palm Beach Dems Cancel Loose Change Screening
- Deniers Go Nuts as Bush Mentions Explosives in WTC
- Uncle Fetzer in the American Thinker?
- Steven Jones Says There Were Hijackers
- British Deniers
- Dylan Explains What They Are About
- Pitts On the Deniers
- A Gay Man On United 93
- A Penny for Your Thoughts
- Welcome Another Member of the NWO
View My Stats
Allies:
14 Comments:
This has to be a parody.
The difference in angle is obvious.
ok...
clip#1 - left side width about 75% of right side width. Clip is closer to WTC
clip#2 - left and right sides about equal width. Clip is further back from WTC.
ummm...I don't see any difference when you account for the DIFFERENT ANGLE THEY WERE FILMED on.
TAM
Don't it make ya feel like dancin...gonna dance the night away..whoo...dance the night away...who...dancin...who...dancin...who.
Actually I feel like pounding the drum machine they used with a shovel..to the beat..beat..beat,,,
Looks like a YTMND. And it's almost as stupid.
If the angles were so well matched up why was there a shadow image of one set of towers? Where have I heard about people not taking into acount camera angle and position....
THE MOON LANDING HOAX!
Let's just change the angle so the 2d translation of a 3d area is distorted to help our cause.
Yeah, you can do a whole lot with that. Hell, I can "disprove" the three-dimension distance formula with horrible angles.
No, motove doesn't matter shawn already explained that it's illogical to look for a motive in a crime.
Don't ya just love strawmen?
I said motive wasn't proof of a crime. But you seem to have missed what I was explaining.
You can't just go "oooh oooh he had a motive". Since the inside jobbers have no other evidence besides motive, then they have no case. Simple as that.
Gee Shawn, you mean a Twoofer misquoted you? I'm shocked! SHOCKED I tell ya!
hey if you want to say 19 marines hijacked the planes and crashed them into the WTC in a suicide mission thats fine
You know, you really hit on something here.
If the CT loons had half a brain, that would be the mainstream CT. Really, they could make up a fake "confession" from a CIA/NWO operative that was piloting the plane (you know, before he did actually pilot the plane), just like all the fake confessions of firefighters, cops, and the Bush administration that they make up, and that CT would actually make sense and work.
But no, they have to make up the most ridiculous and impossible theories. Thermite, CD, CGI, Pull it, A-3, Javelin, NASA Hangar, Remote control, etcetera, etcetera.
If the government is so evil, why didn't they just have 19 CIA agents pose as arabs and hijack the planes? Wouldn't that be much easier than all of the other BS?
Of course Nessie will say hat IS what happened or that they weren't CIA, but Mossad.
You know, fine. At least that, while being an undeniably stupid assertion, would be possible.
Of course if the CIA or Mossad could train 19 guys to hijack a plane and fly it in to buildings, so could a terror group, but thats not relevant right now.
No, motove doesn't matter shawn already explained that it's illogical to look for a motive in a crime.
And I thought a motive was the first thing investigators of crimes always looked for.
That's a good point Malcolm. If I were a mechanic I'd qork only for CTers. Charge them triple the price and blame it on the CIA. I could retire by 30!
If I were a mechanic I'd qork only for CTers. Charge them triple the price and blame it on the CIA.
Unfortunatly, most of the CTers are either not old enough to drive, Can't afford cars, or borrow their mothers car.
Post a Comment
<< Home