Uncle Fetzer in the American Thinker?
Sheesh, guys, Fetzer doesn't qualify:
Evidence the Pentagon was not hit by a Boeing 747 [sic], as the government claims, for example, is extensive and definitive. Here are three points from the first piece anyone coming to Scholar’s web site might be expected to read, which is titled, “Why doubt 9/11?”, namely:
Yep, Uncle Fetzer thinks the official story is that a 747 hit the Pentagon.
* The Pentagon’s own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when it was shown on “The Factor”; but at 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 71-foot Pentagon is high and should have been present and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757!
In this paragraph he gets the plane right, but what is the relevance of the relationship between the length of the plane and the height of the building?
posted by Pat @ 7:37 AM
7 comments
7 Comments:
Intellectual honesty is not a platfrom from which ANYONE in the truth movement should preach.
Keep on mocking those who advocate fringe theories while you're ignoring other truthseekers with more credibility.
Is it even possible to ignore someone who doesn't exist?
Yeah, it's an impressive list. My question for you guys is here you have all these government insiders on your side. According to that recent poll, 30% of Americans are with on the whole "inside job" thing (to some extent at least).
So what's the ETA on this new independent investigation you guys are always on about?
What are you waiting for? An gold-engraved inviation from Bush himself? Get on with it already. It's such an open and shut case, right?
Prove it and put this whole thing to bed.
What about the family committee for 9/11 truth who have spent more time searching for answers as to what had happened to their lost ones more than anyone of us ever have? Are they liars as well?
Some are. Others are just ignorant. Still others are just poor deluded fools. Just like most of the 9/11 denial movement. Very few of the twoofers are aware that they're spreading lies and disinformation. In their eyes they are the avenging angels come to exact rightful vengeance on a wicked government. But their delusions do not make them correct, nor do they mean that we should simply ignore them. Just like a religious fanatic spreads lies while believing that he is doing "God's work", so too are the twoofers convinced of their unfailing righteousness.
An opening of a new inestigation can happen if the movement multiply to greater extent but unfortunately most of you are too busy debunking strawman theories
If we're just debunking strawmen, then that shouldn't be inhibiting any growth for your movement.
911coverup:
Well, if you are going to call Fetzer, head of the "Scholars" a fringe proponent, and without credibility, than I'd have to say, choose your leaders more wisely next time, or shut them up when they open their traps atleast.
As for your obvious ploy at the heart strings, show me quotes from family members that say "BUSH killed my family member" or "Dick Cheney caused 9/11". I suspect most of them want clarification on some things, but I doubt many of them believe the shaite you do.
TAM
Are they all liars too?
Liars, idiots, or ignorant.
Pick one.
Post a Comment
<< Home