Welcome Another Member of the NWO
Fearful Symmetries joins the conspiracy. Talking about the Democracy Now debate between "Do-Over" Dylan and "Just Asking Questions" Jason, Palmer observes:
It was very telling that one of the conspiracy mongers began his diatribe by referring to Popular Mechanics as a yellow dog publication. Opening with an ad hominem attack, it was obvious that they hadn't come to debate the fact but rather to malign a couple men who presumably, in their eyes, represented the increasing number of conspirators.
Excellent post (some blunt language). Be sure to click through to the David Blaka story he links--it's got some choice bits from 9-11 Deniers. Here's your badge, Palmer:
I'll teach you the sacred handshake at the next Bohemian Grove meeting.
posted by Pat @ 12:38 PM
14 comments
14 Comments:
My favorite part of the Blaska rant, is the sheet he had someone fill out, where they ticked "Yes" next to the question...should we negotiate with Osama Bin Laden.
Priceless.
TAM
Well here's the original owners of the FED and the people pulling the strings of the world today:
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
They comprise the ""NWO" so to speak.
At bottom, the 9/11 conspiracy theories are profoundly irrational and unscientific. It is more than passing strange that progressives, who so revere science on such issues as tobacco, stem cells, evolution, and global warming, are so willing to abandon science and give in to fantasy on the subject of 9/11.
Very well written.
I wonder, though, how much they actually realize that they abandon science. Loose Change is so full of pseudo-science and nonsense disguised as science that 99% of its believers very likely do consider themselves scientific.
Why is that 9'11 bullshitter focus so strongly on the minor details of 9/11 instead of the policatl reason for 9/11. Do you guy not realize who gained the most form 9/11? You guys lack logic in tracking who gained from 9/11 because it so cloaded with zeal for your country. Our forefather said that we should fear our government, not trust it!!
A-fuckin'-men!!! The clearest indication of who orchestrated 911 lies squarely with the Office of Special Plans (OSP) and the authors of PNAC. They didn't get lucky because 911 cleared the way for their long term goals, THEY ORCHESTRATED THE WHOLE THING! These communist warmongers for Israel are the people who most benefited for the resulting carnage created by "the war on terror."
The orifinal owners of the Fed are DEAD.
Ah, don't you think they had heirs? Why do I always have to explain the obvious to you guys?
Yes, the usual cui bono farce. Who benefitted from Pearl Harbor? Obviously the French did it.
Do you guy not realize who gained the most form 9/11?
Gain matters not.
If my parents are killed, I collect insurance.
By your logic, even if there's bulletproof evidence someone else committed the crime, I am guilty as I benefitted.
If my parents are killed, I collect insurance.
If they are killed under strange circumstances, you will be the first suspect!
Yes, the usual cui bono farce. Who benefitted from Pearl Harbor? Obviously the French did it.
Hey well, at least you don't deny that OSP, PNAC and Israel are the beneficiaries on the phony "war on terror."
If they are killed under strange circumstances, you will be the first suspect!
How about you DON'T ignore the rest of the post next time?
So, why do you want to kill your parents, shawn? Is this something you've been thinking about for a long time?
And roger follows nesnyc in missing the point.
If your parents died of gunshot wounds from your gun, and nobody was around except you, that would be a different story.
You didn't read my post then. I said if my parents were killed and there was bulletproof evidence against SOMEONE ELSE. Are you people selective with EVERYTHING you read?
But I was wondering how long you've been fantasizing about killing your parents is all.
Leave it to a moron like you to throw out a "how long have you been beating your wife?" line.
Only problem with this is there is ABSOLUTELY NO BULLETPROOF EVIDENCE LINKING AL-QAEDA TO 9/11.
There is.
Try again.
Actually, they're right, it's not bulletproof. It IS enough to draw a logical conclusion however, and leaves very little doubt. Not "reasonable doubt" by any means.
More importantly, there's zero evidence to implicate anyone else. Despite years of trying, troofers have yet to come up with any evidence which shows that the government "did it". In fact, they can't even make up their minds as to what "it"....really IS! How can you prove that an organization was responsible for a crime when you're not even sure of who exactly carried out the crime, how it was done, or, in the case of the no-planers, exactly what the crime IS?
So of the two alternatives it's fairly clear which one a logical individual would go with. One has the backing of hundreds of thousands of experts, video footage, confessions, and DNA and physical evidence. The other side has none of those, but what they do have is conjecture, guesswork, and a lynch-mob mentality. While side two certainly has it's appeal (who doesn't like the feeling of belonging to something special), there's absolutely no LOGICAL reason to believe in it. There's no evidence to back it. Believing the troofer side of the argument is a decision based primarily on emotion, and no court which truly serves justice would ever convict on emotion alone.
Thanks for the kind words and the badge - I'll wear it with pride. Keep up the great work.
Post a Comment
<< Home