Thursday, October 26, 2006

More Evidence from Nico Haupt



The squeaky, high-pitched voice is a nice touch.

12 Comments:

At 26 October, 2006 11:02, Blogger remdem said...

He superimposes one clip over the other of one plane hitting the tower, and I'm supposed to be impressed why? My 9 year old brother with fetal alcohol syndrome can do the same thing with a computer.

Contradictions in sizes? Well, the one angle is zoomed in, and the other is a broad shot. Gee, I guess the plane would appear to change size then, too.

It's like he didn't even try to piece the video together, either. All the images were giant and blocky, and his cgi of a plane hitting another skyscraper was pathetically horrible, like watching an armless man try to draw a still life of a locomotive on a rainy day. He did not even bother to color the rabid orwellian plane hugger! Normally, I at least watch these things for the fact they're usually pieced together nicely, but this time I feel like my eyeballs were raped with a rusty nail. A rusty nail coated with pepper spray.

 
At 26 October, 2006 11:33, Blogger Jujigatami said...

Normally, I at least watch these things for the fact they're usually pieced together nicely, but this time I feel like my eyeballs were raped with a rusty nail. A rusty nail coated with pepper spray.

reading that line made me HAVE to watch the video.

I have to agree. A rusty nail coated with pepper spray.

Perefect comparison.

But I will say, the high pitched squeaky choppy competer generated narration is DEFINETLY evidence that the government could have voice morphed the voices of the victims of Flt. 93 in real time

/sarc

 
At 26 October, 2006 13:03, Blogger shawn said...

This has to be a joke.

 
At 26 October, 2006 13:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting choice of spokesman. It's nice to see that at least some of the truthers aren't even pretending not to be Al-Qaeda apologists anymore.

 
At 26 October, 2006 13:34, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

It was funny...

This site provides me with no end of laughter lately. Thanks to Jim and Pat for finding some of the most extreme, bizaaro shaite, and posting it here. It brightens my day...lol

TAM

 
At 26 October, 2006 21:47, Anonymous Anonymous said...

But I will say, the high pitched squeaky choppy competer generated narration is DEFINETLY evidence that the government could have voice morphed the voices of the victims of Flt. 93 in real time

[puts on tin foil hat]

I thought the same thing man!!!

[takes off tin foil hat]

I dunno, I think this might be a joke....if it's real, well, that's just sadder than sad.

 
At 27 October, 2006 02:45, Blogger The Girl in Grey said...

Wow!

 
At 27 October, 2006 07:36, Blogger Manny said...

This has to be a joke.

I'm unsure. Nico has always been a little unstable, but he's also got a mischevious streak. I think the whole thing might indeed be some kind of twisted "performance art."

 
At 27 October, 2006 18:22, Blogger ewing2001 said...

ScrewLoose on "Bin Laden's 9/11 TV Fakery support"
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=1805

ed: "rendem" for sure ignores that the tower in comparison 1 had exactly same size and view point.
In comparison 2 the camera positions are different and pointed out, but once again, nothing was "zoomed in", also not on my side.
The Tower Sizes are the same, the aircraft sizes different.
Rendem ignores the details of the methodology and produces confusion, where there isn't any.
I did other presentations where *i zoomed in* to match Tower sizes and *also* found contradictions of CGI sizes...

 
At 28 October, 2006 09:52, Blogger shawn said...

There were planes, moron.

 
At 28 October, 2006 18:07, Blogger insidejob said...

I could hardly hear what the guy was saying. why don't you guys try addressing the real evidence? Oh wait! that would mean you'd have to admit the truth! I see! brilliant strategy!

http://belowgroundsurface.org

 
At 29 October, 2006 10:03, Blogger Stevew said...

insidejob

The real evidence has been addressed by real experts.

When are you going to provide real proof that will stand up in court.

How about a point-by-point rebuttal to PM's claims?

That's what PM did to your theories and what Mark's viewers' guide did to Loose Change.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home