posted by Pat @ 8:26 AM
links to this post
He superimposes one clip over the other of one plane hitting the tower, and I'm supposed to be impressed why? My 9 year old brother with fetal alcohol syndrome can do the same thing with a computer. Contradictions in sizes? Well, the one angle is zoomed in, and the other is a broad shot. Gee, I guess the plane would appear to change size then, too. It's like he didn't even try to piece the video together, either. All the images were giant and blocky, and his cgi of a plane hitting another skyscraper was pathetically horrible, like watching an armless man try to draw a still life of a locomotive on a rainy day. He did not even bother to color the rabid orwellian plane hugger! Normally, I at least watch these things for the fact they're usually pieced together nicely, but this time I feel like my eyeballs were raped with a rusty nail. A rusty nail coated with pepper spray.
Normally, I at least watch these things for the fact they're usually pieced together nicely, but this time I feel like my eyeballs were raped with a rusty nail. A rusty nail coated with pepper spray.reading that line made me HAVE to watch the video. I have to agree. A rusty nail coated with pepper spray.Perefect comparison.But I will say, the high pitched squeaky choppy competer generated narration is DEFINETLY evidence that the government could have voice morphed the voices of the victims of Flt. 93 in real time/sarc
This has to be a joke.
Interesting choice of spokesman. It's nice to see that at least some of the truthers aren't even pretending not to be Al-Qaeda apologists anymore.
It was funny...This site provides me with no end of laughter lately. Thanks to Jim and Pat for finding some of the most extreme, bizaaro shaite, and posting it here. It brightens my day...lolTAM
But I will say, the high pitched squeaky choppy competer generated narration is DEFINETLY evidence that the government could have voice morphed the voices of the victims of Flt. 93 in real time[puts on tin foil hat]I thought the same thing man!!![takes off tin foil hat]I dunno, I think this might be a joke....if it's real, well, that's just sadder than sad.
This has to be a joke.I'm unsure. Nico has always been a little unstable, but he's also got a mischevious streak. I think the whole thing might indeed be some kind of twisted "performance art."
ScrewLoose on "Bin Laden's 9/11 TV Fakery support"http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=1805ed: "rendem" for sure ignores that the tower in comparison 1 had exactly same size and view point.In comparison 2 the camera positions are different and pointed out, but once again, nothing was "zoomed in", also not on my side.The Tower Sizes are the same, the aircraft sizes different.Rendem ignores the details of the methodology and produces confusion, where there isn't any.I did other presentations where *i zoomed in* to match Tower sizes and *also* found contradictions of CGI sizes...
There were planes, moron.
I could hardly hear what the guy was saying. why don't you guys try addressing the real evidence? Oh wait! that would mean you'd have to admit the truth! I see! brilliant strategy!http://belowgroundsurface.org
insidejobThe real evidence has been addressed by real experts. When are you going to provide real proof that will stand up in court.How about a point-by-point rebuttal to PM's claims?That's what PM did to your theories and what Mark's viewers' guide did to Loose Change.
Post a Comment
Create a Link