PDoherty, Debunker?
It sounds too good to be true, but that's what he claims over at 9-11 Conspiracy Smasher.
Yes i suppose [the Wieck/Roberts debate with the Loosers] did help. Also the thread at jref by lyte trip on lloyd testimony convinced me what a truly deranged movement i was a part of.
I realised in the last few days that i wasnt just arguing with jrefers, I was arguing with the rational part of my mind.
I now only believe that warnings were ignored.
I think the CD hypothesis on reflection is absurd
BTW, I noted over a month ago on the JREF forum that PDoherty was quite capable of doing solid debunking work. Meanwhile, the folks at the Looser Forum are taking this with some dismay.
17 Comments:
Yep,
This is about as significant as John Q. Public decides to take a pee.
No...fucking...way.
Quick, someone call Ken Lay and tell him he'll have a White Christmas after all!
...seriously, I'll wait a bit before taking him at his word.
Posting the audio of my phone call into Kevin Barrett and Jon Gold here
When we are clearly winning, as this post shows, doesn't it strike you that the insults may not help?
Troy,
Bite Me.
Pat,
What insults are you talking about?
Yes I think PD is changing. I think he has just come to the realization that the entire movement he has been defending really has no solid evidence to back it up...and now he feels he must have said evidence to believe.
I find it odd that he still finds JREFers "disgusting", but I guess that is for personal reasons, not limited to the nasty insult hurling thrown his way, in response to the same he has thrown himself.
I think I will give him a chance, some time to watch his behavior, and if he seems legit, then I will hold no more against him...
TAM
LD,
I call 'em as I see 'em.
LOL, I loved when Barrett called SLC "One big psyop". I am still waiting for the CIA to pay my DSL bill.
BG, I was referring to Troy's comment.
Lying_Dylan said...
So does Troy apparently.
I admit it, LD,
You comment here was funny.
I find it odd that he still finds JREFers "disgusting", but I guess that is for personal reasons, not limited to the nasty insult hurling thrown his way, in response to the same he has thrown himself.
That's probably a defense mechanism he's clinging to in order to keep some semblance of justification of his actions. This assumes his little conversion is an honest one.
Telescopemerc my conversion is indeed honest.
Sorry bub, your conversion might be honest, but I'll reserve judgement. This look more like a chance for a guy who loves being contrary to get more hypocritical jibes in.
If you would stop insulting truthers you might find they are less likely to become even more determined to prove you wrong and engrained in their beliefs.
QED.
Part of me suspects you never bought any of the CT arguements, you just liked trying to push buttons.
I take Pd at his word. I believe, and stated as much weeks ago, that he came to the debunking sites seeking information.
Killtown is one of the worst of the Troothers and their lies. He wouldn't know the "truth" if it hit him in the ass.
I was on a "Loose Change" forum under another name (who needs these nuts coming after me?), and got the worst invective and name-calling when I merely questioned them on getting actual demolition experts to agree that WTC 1 and 2 were brought down by demolition.
Killtown is one of the worst of the Troothers and their lies. He wouldn't know the "truth" if it hit him in the ass.
PD was/is worse. Frankly, I feel a bit uncomfortable having him on "our" side. There's definitely something wrong with that character, and I for one don't want anything to do with him.
Post a Comment
<< Home