Saturday, December 23, 2006

PDoherty, Debunker?

It sounds too good to be true, but that's what he claims over at 9-11 Conspiracy Smasher.

Yes i suppose [the Wieck/Roberts debate with the Loosers] did help. Also the thread at jref by lyte trip on lloyd testimony convinced me what a truly deranged movement i was a part of.

I realised in the last few days that i wasnt just arguing with jrefers, I was arguing with the rational part of my mind.

I now only believe that warnings were ignored.

I think the CD hypothesis on reflection is absurd


BTW, I noted over a month ago on the JREF forum that PDoherty was quite capable of doing solid debunking work. Meanwhile, the folks at the Looser Forum are taking this with some dismay.

29 Comments:

At 23 December, 2006 18:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yep,

This is about as significant as John Q. Public decides to take a pee.

 
At 23 December, 2006 19:20, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

I smell BS.

 
At 23 December, 2006 19:30, Blogger Conspiracy Smasher said...

I take him at his word...

 
At 23 December, 2006 19:33, Blogger shawn said...

No...fucking...way.

 
At 23 December, 2006 19:34, Blogger Nyke said...

Quick, someone call Ken Lay and tell him he'll have a White Christmas after all!

...seriously, I'll wait a bit before taking him at his word.

 
At 23 December, 2006 19:54, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Posting the audio of my phone call into Kevin Barrett and Jon Gold here

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:02, Blogger troy said...

You sound like a fag

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:17, Blogger Pat said...

When we are clearly winning, as this post shows, doesn't it strike you that the insults may not help?

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:20, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

That is true!
Everyday it seems that one trouther is eating another.
I do like how BG mentioned SLC!!
Good Job Bill!!

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:27, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Bill,
I wlll give you credit for bringing up Jae Fonda and how that was used against her.

I was pretty amazed to hear KB say "I dont remeber that".

KB seems to "not remember" alot wh
As much as I commend you for stating that though I still go back to feeling of, "you lie down with dogs"

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:39, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Troy,

Bite Me.

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pat,

What insults are you talking about?

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:40, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Yes I think PD is changing. I think he has just come to the realization that the entire movement he has been defending really has no solid evidence to back it up...and now he feels he must have said evidence to believe.

I find it odd that he still finds JREFers "disgusting", but I guess that is for personal reasons, not limited to the nasty insult hurling thrown his way, in response to the same he has thrown himself.

I think I will give him a chance, some time to watch his behavior, and if he seems legit, then I will hold no more against him...

TAM

 
At 23 December, 2006 20:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

LD,

I call 'em as I see 'em.

 
At 23 December, 2006 21:03, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

So does Troy apparently.

 
At 23 December, 2006 21:08, Blogger James B. said...

LOL, I loved when Barrett called SLC "One big psyop". I am still waiting for the CIA to pay my DSL bill.

 
At 23 December, 2006 21:12, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

How does one get a slice of the NWO pie?

 
At 23 December, 2006 21:24, Blogger Pat said...

BG, I was referring to Troy's comment.

 
At 23 December, 2006 21:45, Anonymous Anonymous said...


Lying_Dylan said...

So does Troy apparently.


I admit it, LD,

You comment here was funny.

 
At 23 December, 2006 21:48, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

I along with the rest of my NWO brothers thanks you!

 
At 23 December, 2006 22:03, Blogger telescopemerc said...

I find it odd that he still finds JREFers "disgusting", but I guess that is for personal reasons, not limited to the nasty insult hurling thrown his way, in response to the same he has thrown himself.

That's probably a defense mechanism he's clinging to in order to keep some semblance of justification of his actions. This assumes his little conversion is an honest one.

 
At 23 December, 2006 23:43, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Telescopemerc my conversion is indeed honest.

If you would stop insulting truthers you might find they are less likely to become even more determined to prove you wrong and engrained in their beliefs.

 
At 24 December, 2006 08:14, Blogger telescopemerc said...

Telescopemerc my conversion is indeed honest.

Sorry bub, your conversion might be honest, but I'll reserve judgement. This look more like a chance for a guy who loves being contrary to get more hypocritical jibes in.


If you would stop insulting truthers you might find they are less likely to become even more determined to prove you wrong and engrained in their beliefs.


QED.

Part of me suspects you never bought any of the CT arguements, you just liked trying to push buttons.

 
At 24 December, 2006 09:03, Blogger CHF said...

I smell some BS to.

PD did show signs of improvement at times (like when he admitted 'Al Qaeda did it') but then he'd follow it up with something so absurd ('Al Qaeda might have planted the demolition charges') that it just didn't seem like he were all there mentally.

Basically, I doubt his story because I simply refuse to believe that someone with the education he claims to have could possibly be suckered in by twoofer bullshit - even for just a little while.

PD was fooled for MONTHS!

 
At 24 December, 2006 09:17, Blogger CHF said...

Hahahaha!

The children over at the LC board think PD's a shill or an agent.

Priceless!

 
At 24 December, 2006 10:49, Blogger HidariMak said...

I was raised as a member of the United Church before I "saw the light" and stopped believing. And since the loosers are so similar to a religious cult, I can understand how someone might need some time before preferring to see reality to whatever they were comfortable with believing before.

Why not just view PDoherty as you would any first time poster here? If he acts up after supposedly seeing our side, dismiss him then, but give them a chance to not screw up too. My 2ยข.

 
At 24 December, 2006 13:23, Blogger pomeroo said...

I take Pd at his word. I believe, and stated as much weeks ago, that he came to the debunking sites seeking information.

 
At 24 December, 2006 14:53, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

Killtown is one of the worst of the Troothers and their lies. He wouldn't know the "truth" if it hit him in the ass.

I was on a "Loose Change" forum under another name (who needs these nuts coming after me?), and got the worst invective and name-calling when I merely questioned them on getting actual demolition experts to agree that WTC 1 and 2 were brought down by demolition.

 
At 25 December, 2006 12:02, Blogger Alex said...

Killtown is one of the worst of the Troothers and their lies. He wouldn't know the "truth" if it hit him in the ass.

PD was/is worse. Frankly, I feel a bit uncomfortable having him on "our" side. There's definitely something wrong with that character, and I for one don't want anything to do with him.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home