Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Law School Prof Supports LIHOP, Says Anthrax Attack by US Gov't

Alex Jones and 9-11 Blogger are promoting this, but it's really no big deal.

"After the September 11th 2001 Terrorist attacks, the Bush administration tried to ram the USA PATRIOT Act through Congress, that would have, if already had not, set up a police state. And we know for a fact that the PATRIOT Act had already been drafted and was sitting on Ashcroft's desk as of September 10th.

Senators Daschle and Leahy were holding it up because they realised what this would lead to, indeed the first draft of the Patriot Act, they would have suspended the writ of habeas corpus. And all of a sudden out of nowhere come these anthrax attacks. And at the time I myself did not know precisely what was going on, either with respect to September 11th or the anthrax attacks, but then the New York Times revealed that the technology behind the letter to Senator Daschle. A trillion spores per gram, special electro-static treatment.

This is super-weapons grade Anthrax that even the United States government, in its openly proclaimed programs, and we had one before Nixon, had never developed before. So it was obvious to me that this was from a US Government lab, there is no where else you could have gotten that."


The professor is Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois, but when we start looking him up, it becomes obvious that he's a Bush-Basher from way back, and this is just his latest line. For example, according to Jones' flunky Steve Watson, the prof claims:

At that point Boyle says it became very clear to him that there was a cover up in operation by the FBI. He points out that later on on reading one of David Ray Griffin's books on the 9/11 attacks, he discovered that Agent Bowman was the same FBI agent who sabotaged the FISA warrant for access to Zacarious Moussaoui's computer, which contained information that could have facilitated the prevention of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.


It became very clear to him in 2002, but somehow he forgot to mention this in the impeachment resolution he drafted in 2003, which contains not a word about anthrax. He also wrote a book Destroying World Order that was published in 2005 or 2006, which is summarized here. Curiously, once again, this "very clear" argument about anthrax was once again not mentioned.

His Wikipedia bio mentions some of the charming folks he has worked for in the past:

From 1991 to 1993, Boyle was a legal advisor to the Palestine Liberation Organization. Boyle is currently attorney of record for the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria and a member of the Nobel Peace Prize for Governor George H. Ryan Committee.

Professor Boyle is a controversial figure at the University of Illinois. He worked to prevent a war between the United States and Libya in the 1990s, and speaks fondly of his interactions with Muammar al-Qaddafi.

9 Comments:

At 20 December, 2006 08:29, Blogger Curt Cameron said...

Is everyone aware of this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5377744.stm

The powder used in the attacks was reportedly of a common strain and had not been processed to make it more easily dispersible - and therefore, more lethal.

The paper quotes a report by an FBI scientist, Douglas J Beecher, who dismisses as a "widely-circulated misconception" the view that the anthrax spores were produced "using additives and sophisticated engineering supposedly akin to military weapons production".

 
At 20 December, 2006 08:33, Blogger Curt Cameron said...

Sorry I didn't linkify that:

US attacks used 'common anthrax'

 
At 20 December, 2006 10:30, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

The Utah spores, grown and processed at the 800,000-acre Dugway Proving Ground about 80 miles from Salt Lake City, belong to the Ames strain -- the same strain used in the deadly letters sent to media outlets and two senators in September and October. No other nation is known to have made weapons-grade Ames. And although it is legal to make small quantities of such agents under the provisions of an international treaty the United States has signed, experts said yesterday they were surprised by the revelation that a U.S. lab was producing such lethal material.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A34707-2001
Dec12¬Found=true

Anthrax Missing From Army Lab
January 20, 2002
By JACK DOLAN And DAVE ALTIMARI, Courant Staff Writers

Implicates Phillip Zack in the theft of Anthrax.


It isn't hard to figure out who was behind this terrible attack.

 
At 20 December, 2006 12:35, Blogger Alex said...

Hey man....c'mon, you know what it's like. Sitting around the NWO cafeteria, chatting about our World Domination plans...that's FUN, you know? But actually implementing it? It's too much work! After a few months the guys just get bored, say "screw this", and go home for some BBQ and beer. Why would any of us want to be taking over the world when we could be relaxing in the back yard instead?

 
At 20 December, 2006 12:54, Blogger Pat said...

Curt, I think the Anthrax sent to Daschle and Leahy was higher quality than that sent to the media outlets.

 
At 20 December, 2006 12:58, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

Hey - isn't "dispersing anthrax to Senators Leahy and Daschle" an impeachable offense?

 
At 20 December, 2006 13:57, Blogger shawn said...

He has only good things to say about a dictator and worked for a terrorist organization.

Yet Bush is the bad guy? I'm no Bush-pusher, but these folks really need to learn consistency.

 
At 21 December, 2006 17:30, Blogger Cl1mh4224rd said...

Democrat wrote: "Let's focuson the man himself instead of on his message. Will it be different anytime soon on this blog?"

Kind of like when "your side" tries to dust over that Popular Mechanics article by pointing out that the editor was Michael Chertoff's cousin?

Sorry, but you've got no moral high-ground to stand on, Democrat. You've already strip-mined that hill...

 
At 22 December, 2006 08:37, Blogger Alex said...

Let's focuson the man himself instead of on his message. Will it be different anytime soon on this blog?

Nope. Since we've already torn apart your arguments, there's no point in discussing them any more. You've become nothing more than a form of entertainment. You'd get about the same reaction from us if you put on a dunce cap and performed some physical comedy routines. If you're looking for someone to debate with you, either bring up something we haven't heard and debunked before, or look elsewhere. Nobody is forcing you to be here.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home