Titanic Conspiracy Revealed!
Was it all a plot to get rid of Major Butt?
posted by Pat @ 6:00 PM
41 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Friday, December 08, 2006
Previous Posts
- Terrific Debunking Post
- One of the More Articulate Deniers
- The Nutty Roots
- Just In Case You Wondered What Would Happen...
- Creative Math
- A Date That Will Live In Infamy
- Candle Likely Culprit in Burlingame Blaze
- One More Request on Comments
- If Dylan Avery Had Been Around in 1946
- The Fat Man Speaks
View My Stats
Allies:
41 Comments:
The most surreal thing that's happened to me while playing with CTers is that after writing a long winded parody of 9/11 conspiracy theories by comparing it to the Titanic (here as a matter of fact), like in a matter of days, I happened to catch a special on Titanic conspiracy theories. I saw some of those satirical points raised. My mind should not have been allowed to go through that.
I just don't know how we're supposed to deal with some of the people in this world.
This video was an extremely effective parody!
Now, back to reality: Whose War on Whose Terror? Reclaiming Our Rights
BG never learned about irony....
alex
The American Heritage Dictionary recognizes a secondary meaning for irony: “incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs.”
There's no irony here. This "hit piece" is carefully designed to make a complete mockery of 9/11 Truthers, which it does about as effectively as anything I've seen.
9/11 truthers do a fantastic job of making parodies of themselves.
The titanic was unsinkable.
The Towers were designed to withstand a jetliner hitting them.
Iceberg, Greenberg, same difference.
Blah Blah blah.
There's no irony here. This "hit piece" is carefully designed to make a complete mockery of 9/11 Truthers, which it does about as effectively as anything I've seen.
....
THIS was the Ironic part:
Now, back to reality: Whose War on Whose Terror? Reclaiming Our Rights
Seriously Bill, what's going on in that head of yours? I feel like we're speaking two totally different languages here. Maybe you can teach me to speak Woo?
lying....
if that's what floats your boat.
The Titanic Conspiracy...
Rare TV NEWS report about [1993] WTC bombing FBI Foreknowledge
What do you mean it's not a joke?
There's no WAY that he's actually being serious...
Sorry to disappoint, Mark.
BG, nobody reads your spam. give it up man.
I wish this were a joke:
The national job approval rating of Bush has plummeted to 30%, an all-time low, sinking below the 31% approval rating he dropped to in early June.
Some more hilarity:
Report Says Oil Royalties Go Unpaid
Would you like the WSJ article link, Mark?
the Nov. 26, 2001, p.1, WALL STREET JOURNAL, article on army sergeant, Ali Mohamed, at Fort Bragg, NC and his paramilitary training of 5 Arab men in 1989 who would later be convicted in the 1993 WTC bombing...Mr. Mohamed was an informant of the FBI and had worked as a laison for the CIA...Mr. Mohamed was linked to El Nosair who murdered Rabbi Kahane...he was linked to Sheik Omar(who was worried the FBI was bugging him...they were)
Peter Lance has it wrong mostly, but at least he has documented the connections.
Triple Cross: How bin Laden's Master Spy Penetrated the CIA, the Green Berets, and the FBI--and Why Patrick Fitzgerald Failed to Stop Him (Hardcover)
February 26, 1993: WTC Is Bombed but Does Not Collapse, as Bombers Had Hoped
Bomb damage in underground levels of the WTC in 1993.Bomb damage in underground levels of the WTC in 1993. [Source: Najlah Feanny/ Corbis] An attempt to topple the WTC fails, but six people are killed and over 1000 are injured in the misfired blast. An FBI explosives expert later states that, “If they had found the exact architectural Achilles’ heel or if the bomb had been a little bit bigger, not much more, 500 pounds more, I think it would have brought her down.” Ramzi Yousef, who has close ties to bin Laden, organizes the attempt. [US Congress, 2/24/1998; Village Voice, 3/30/1993] The New York Times later reports on Emad Salem, an undercover agent who will be the key government witness in the trial against Yousef. Salem testifies that the FBI knew about the attack beforehand and told him they would thwart it by substituting a harmless powder for the explosives. However, an FBI supervisor called off this plan, and the bombing was not stopped. [New York Times, 10/28/1993] Other suspects were ineptly investigated before the bombing as early as 1990. Several of the bombers were trained by the CIA to fight in the Afghan war, and the CIA later concludes, in internal documents, that it was “partly culpable” for this bombing. [Independent, 11/1/1998] US officials later state that the overall mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, is a close relative, probably an uncle, of Yousef. [Independent, 6/6/2002; Los Angeles Times, 9/1/2002] One of the attackers even leaves a message which will later be found by investigators, stating, “Next time, it will be very precise.” [Associated Press, 9/30/2001]
Here's something to celebrate:
The Death of Right-Wing Talk Radio Relevance
Look, it's BG with makeup
Let's see, I've got more stuff to make ya laugh. Think about the huge number of Americans in Prison or otherwise in trouble with the law because of this:
The Marijuana Conspiracy:The real reason hemp is illegal
You want more evidence of how seriously sick our world is, thanks to police state warped hysteria. Make fun of Alex Jones as much as you want, but take a moment to comprehend the following:
4 -year-old Accused of Improperly Touching Teacher
Wife: Have you got anything without spam?
Waitress: Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Wife: I don't want ANY spam!
Man: Why can't she have egg bacon spam and sausage?
Wife: THAT'S got spam in it!
Man: Hasn't got as much spam in it as spam egg sausage and spam, has it?
Vikings: Spam spam spam spam...
HTML should really have a </BG> tag.
Alex,
You are being too kind.
More of a reality check for those of you who just want to get your jollies making fun of "truthers":
I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear--fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done.
MV, I'm pretty sure it is intended as a joke--note the part about the guy's professors working on a paper; I can find no reference to those people online. He doesn't do it broad slapstick but there are some clues along the way.
Thanks for linking to the original TV Spam sketch!!
Incarceration Rates
Posted by Kieran Healy
Via Chris Uggen, some new Bureau of Justice Statistics for incarceration in the United States as of mid-2005.
Dave Lindorff: A Congress of Whores and Pipsqueaks
9/11 Demolition ? debris tracking - joining the dots to 7/7 tavistock Square - No amazing pics yet.
The guy is a comedian: http://www.myspace.com/947312
billy,
That much was obvious from the start, wasn't it?
It is the goal of If Americans Knew to provide full and accurate information on this critical issue, and on our power – and duty – to bring a resolution.
BG is really getting desperate, trotting out every piece of BS he can find. I have noticed on some forums I post on that they all use the same regurgated BS word for word. AJ has his writers working over time to pump out this crap.
I once proved how the Titanic was actually blown up in a secret government / Mossad covert operation by blowing up a plastic model with a Black Cat firecracker in my bathtub. I mean, the ship broke in two, right? - there was no WAY a ship of that size, strength and structure could have "just broken" after "hitting an iceberg." I know what all the eyewitnesses and survivors say happened, but they're all in on the mission to cover up the REAL truth. The actual victims' families are still alive and well - spread out all over the world.
The US government, under Republicans, won't let this information see the light of day, and have blocked my every attempt to look into the matter. I say we get the truthout.
That about sums up the loosers. More wheels coming off the bus daily, and they keep doubling down. There must be a new mental condition among these folks - I think I'll call it Severe Acute Leopoldism
stevew,
With your expertise on mental illness, are you, or have you ever been a member of The International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE)
stevew,
I am ranting. I am ranting about issues that I believe are important. I don't take my cue from Alex Jones, although I admit I noticed the youtube link to the truth about the 1993 WTC bombing at one of Alex's sites.
My belief is that when James and Pat run out of intelligent material and resort to posts such at this, the only way to combat distraction and mockery is to bring back into focus what the facts are and a fair interpretation of state of the Union based on those facts.
I just can't wait to be further informed by Bush's next SOTU address , can you?
BG I thought you had me on ignore LOL I don't have to be a doctor to recognize your mental illness. You have been beaten like a red headed stepchild but you always come back for more LOL I know the guys here love it
I don't take my cue from Alex Jones
No, you seem to take it from the multiple voices in your head.
Voice 1: "Tell them about controlled demolition!"
Voice 2: "no, no, no, that's inconsistent with the x-ray laser theory!"
Voice 3: "Duuuhhh....i-n-c-o-n-s-i-s-t-e-n-t?"
Voice 4: "Mind control! Florine in the pipes! CONTRAILS!!!!"
Voice 5: "Homosexuals and satanists in the government!!"
Voice 4: "COOONTRAIIIILLSSS!!!!"
Voice 6: "shut up, shut UP, SHUT UP!!!"
I admit I noticed the youtube link to the truth about the 1993 WTC bombing at one of Alex's sites.
Alex Jones has a link about Ramzi Yousef trying to topple the tower?
Bg has to stay very busy. Otherwise we might notice that the answer Dr. Greening provided to his "question" didn't agree with his prejudices.
Hey, bg, got any more "questions" for Greening or NIST? Be warned: your disingenuous "questions" all have answers you don't like.
Post a Comment
<< Home