The Voice of Evil
You can listen to transmissions between Cleveland ATC and Flight 93 (and a couple other flights) at this link. They do not have the sound of the initial takeover of the aircraft (described as screams by an air traffic controller), but you can hear Ziad Jarrah announcing that there is a bomb on board the airplane and that they were returning to the airport. The clip also contains the confirmation of the crash by another airplane.
posted by Pat @ 10:08 AM
27 comments
27 Comments:
Pat,
This blog is getting further away from interesting discussion material and moving toward polarizing posts which seem to serve mostly for bragging (about your correctness) and bashing (about the craziness of those who don't agree with you).
It's your right to post whatever you want. It's my right to speculate that you aren't changing anyone's mind by posting old material which is still as subject to alternative explanations as it was when the govt. agencies originally released it.
Yeah, why bother changing people's minds! It's not like people in the CT crowd laugh at the idea of boxcutters or how cowardly the passengers were...
Bill, what polarizing and bashing went on in this post? I don't know whether this is old material or not; it was just posted on DU this morning which is where I found it.
Gee BG, I would hate to inconvenience you by piling on the overwhelming evidence that what you guys believe it utter bunk. I suppose we could start some "self esteem" program for conspiracy theorists to help them feel good about themselves. Repeat after me, "I have value, I am smart, and gosh darnit, people like me."
I'm stll waiting for the toofers to post some facts or a detailed explanation of their theories
You really don't think the heading
"The Voice of Evil"
isn't polarizing?
I still can't bring myself to even watch the movie about flight 93, that audio would just be too much. Looks like it struck a nerve with bg, too, but probably for a different reason. Must be tough for him to accept physical evidence that it was terrorists, after all.
Responding to Stevew,
"So whoever pulled this misleading scam was quite deliberately using two entirely different frequencies in sequence, one after the other. To start the ball rolling the perpetrators deliberately used the emergency channel because everyone within radio range would hear the “screams” on guard, regardless of whether they were transmitting or receiving on another working frequency at the same time. Remember that the “guard” receiver works in parallel at 110% volume, ensuring all aircrew and controllers hear emergency messages on 121.5 over [louder than] their other radio activities."
link
You don't think that people who crash planes into buildings are evil?
BG, we give you an opportunity to express your opinion, which is way more than you will find at most conspiracy theory sites, that doesn't mean we are somehow obligated to endorse your opinion.
BG, once again, amusing me to no end, has the impression that anyone who reads this blog cares at all about his opinion of what should be posted. That's why this isn't your blog BG.
You sound like a spoiled six year old kid who just went to his friend's house for a playdate, but they don't have the brand of Mac and Cheese that he likes.
Now, before you get your back up, I understand you have the right to comment and say what you please. I have the right to criticize you for it.
Stick to your blog, BG, people on here don't need mind changing.
Yatesey said...,
How'd you know that I am oh so persnickety about my Mac and Cheese???
SO BG u are saying that the tape was faked right?
BG-
Lucky guess. By the way, I have to say I'm impressed with the use of persnickety.
Jay said...
SO BG u are saying that the tape was faked right?
I know the culprits behind 9/11 did the following:
1) Blew up 3 bldgs and damaged others (in unknown ways) at the WTC Complex.
2) Faked a plane crash at the Pentagon
3) Faked a plane crash around Shanksville.
I don't know how they manipulated this audio, but it seems fairly minor to have manipulated this compared to the magnitude to of the other deceptions that were pulled off on 9/11.
ROFL!!!
Dude i can't beieve they actually let people use computers in the padded rooms in mental facilities.
Yep, he's straying further away from reality every day. Pretty soon he'll be another Nesnyc.
BG give proof of your charges that will stand up in court
He already IS a no-planer. He's claiming that both 77 and 93 were "faked". That's 2 out of 4, AND he thinks the government "Blew up 3 bldgs and damaged others (in unknown ways)" at the WTC complex. If he believes that 2 of 4 crashes were faked, and that the buildings were brought down by "unknown ways", then it's only logical to believe that the other 2 airplane crashes were also faked. So yeah, he's a no-planer.
How can people make these stupid claims with no facts to back themselves up?
1) Blew up 3 bldgs and damaged others (in unknown ways) at the WTC Complex.
Three very tall buildings collapse and the surrounding buildings are damaged, according to BG, "in unknown ways". That's absolutely classic...
So, bg, for all your hot air about having real questions, you turn out to be a garden-variety nutter.
Your insane beliefs are unfalsifiable and you have established yourself as a full-fledged member of the tinfoil-hat brigade.
Gee, I wonder if those commercial airliners did any damage when they crashed into buildings at 500mph--yeah, that's a serious question all right.
BG said:
This blog is getting further away from interesting discussion material and moving toward polarizing posts
I feel the same way about reality.
Murdervillage I thought you might have calmed your heathens down but alas they continue to spout personal attacks at a person. Oh well you gave it your best shot I suppose.
Does anyone know if the passengers reported seeing a bomb that the alleged hijacker stated he had on board?
Democrat I was referring to the voice of evil post and the alleged hijacker's statment that there was a bomb on board. I wasn't sure if any passenger had made a phone call that identified a bomb on board.
Pat why are you misleading your readers?
You state The clip also contains the confirmation of the crash by another airplane.
Anyone know who the unidentified female ATC is in the recording asking,
"Do you see any uhh activity on your right side smoke or anything like that?"
After searching for the plane...
"Yeah we do have a smoke puff now at about probably 2 o'clock it appears to be a dark cloud like a puff of black smoke."
I hear no confirmation of a crash, just a 'puff of smoke'.
Another lie or an blantant error by the OS community. Please make your blog more respectable by stating facts.
Murdervillage I thought you might have calmed your heathens down but alas they continue to spout personal attacks at a person.
As opposed to....?
Spouting personal attacks at a wall?
"You're hard! You're thick! You're cold! Stop being so damn....bricky!"
You're a master of the English language, swinger.
I hear no confirmation of a crash, just a 'puff of smoke'.
Could you just this once, for the first time in your life, try to put together 2 and 2 and actually arrive at 4?
Hey JamesB,if you've never heard the cockpit seizure tapes I know where you can listen to them awnser if you're interested
Post a Comment
<< Home