Tuesday, January 09, 2007

But They Don't Hate America

Just listen to this Denier over at 9-11 Blogger:

The problem is,we can`t get enough Americans,to pull together,that would fill a Greyhound Bus.

America,home of the Brave...Right!! It should read;America,home of the Greedy,Ignorant,self serving,Cowards.Add "Dump & Weak" on top,for dressing.
I can see it now,Americans with their arms wrapped around their "Material Possessions,searching for a place to hide with that,that is "Most Precious" to them.(Cars,X-Boxes,Boats,Suv`s,Black Berries,All of the Important things in life.

29 Comments:

At 09 January, 2007 13:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rebuttal to DODIG and SSCI reports on Able Danger

 
At 09 January, 2007 14:00, Blogger Alex said...

Oh lookie, more spam by bg.

Newsflash: Bill Giltner is a retarded spammer!

Since it looks like you guys aren't going to ban him, I'm thinking of writing a filter for firefox to block him.

As for the article, the guy's obviously an idiot. I'm having a wonderful daydream of a coupe Americans beating him to death x-boxes and blackberries.

 
At 09 January, 2007 14:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alex,

I realise you'll slam anything I say or link to. However, I'd ask you to take a second look at the Able Danger Blog.

 
At 09 January, 2007 14:23, Blogger Unknown said...

BG,

I realise you'll slam anything I say or link to. However, I'd ask you to take a second look at the link below.

Newsflash: Bill Giltner is a retarded spammer!

 
At 09 January, 2007 14:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Richard,

If one were to look at the SLC Blog and it's management as an online environment which is developing a track record for what commenting behaviors will and won't be allowed, your action is furthering a precedent of clear personal attack spamming. I don't presume to have any authority to stop this action.

However, I would point out to James and Pat, and others who are concerned with fostering a healthy community, that once a precedent of flagrant personal attacks is established, it's is unrealistic to expect the situation to be self-correcting.

Pat/James,

I implore you to take down personal attacks from your blog comments.

 
At 09 January, 2007 15:04, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

These are the same sickos who are calling a retreat from Iraq a "redeployment."

Their language gets more Orwellian each passing day.

 
At 09 January, 2007 15:05, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

Since it looks like you guys aren't going to ban him, I'm thinking of writing a filter for firefox to block him.

I don't want to see anyone "banned."

Besides, keeping this loon around keeps us all with our eye on the prize: exposing the Troother nuts for all of their delusional psychoses.

 
At 09 January, 2007 15:08, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

The hilarious part about BG, or any other Troother, saying that to ban them is against free speech is that if you post on a Troother website or blog with any message other than the nutsy futsy story of buying into the 9/11 conspiracy horseshit, they ban you in 2 seconds, without any hesitation.

Liberals love free speech - until they have to hear something they don't like, and then they ban the message and the messenger.

 
At 09 January, 2007 15:19, Blogger Alex said...

If one were to look at the SLC Blog and it's management as an online environment which is developing a track record for what commenting behaviors will and won't be allowed, your action is furthering a precedent of clear personal attack spamming.

Shut the hell up you slimy little weasel. You are the LAST person who should be contributing this holier-than-thou advice on proper behaviour. Try that shit offline some time, and you'll be lucky if the worst you end up with is a few missing teeth.

 
At 09 January, 2007 18:46, Blogger Cl1mh4224rd said...

His mental state certainly seems to have degenerated extremely rapidly.

Or, he's like that spoiled brat who gets indignant and trashes other peoples' stuff when he doesn't get his way.

 
At 09 January, 2007 19:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I really think the following movie and website needs to be debunked. We need to get on this!

The movie "9/11: Press for Truth" should be debunked.

View the trailer for the movie at the following website:

( Running Time: 2 min. 13 sec.)

http://www.911pressfortruth.com/

Watch the entire film at Google Video:

( Running Time: 1 hr. 24 min. 21 sec. )

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5589099104255077250&q=9%2F11%3A+Press+for+Truth

The Complete 9/11 Timeline at the Center for Cooperative Research website needs to be debunked as well:

Complete 9/11 Timeline:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Patriots Question 9/11 website needs to be dubunked as well:

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com

LET'S GET ON IT!

 
At 09 January, 2007 19:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I really think the following movie and website needs to be debunked. We need to get on this!

The movie "9/11: Press for Truth" should be debunked.

View the trailer for the movie at the following website:

( Running Time: 2 min. 13 sec.)

http://www.911pressfortruth.com/

Watch the entire film at Google Video:

( Running Time: 1 hr. 24 min. 21 sec. )

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5589099104255077250&q=9%2F11%3A+Press+for+Truth

The Complete 9/11 Timeline at the Center for Cooperative Research website needs to be debunked as well:

Complete 9/11 Timeline:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Patriots Question 9/11 website needs to be dubunked as well:

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com

LET'S GET ON IT!

 
At 09 January, 2007 19:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm just asking for some help. What is wrong with that? Are you a Moonbat? You sure sound like one.

 
At 09 January, 2007 21:17, Blogger Alex said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 09 January, 2007 21:37, Blogger Alex said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 09 January, 2007 21:37, Blogger Alex said...

Sorry bub, but the crowd around here aint quite as oblivious as the bunch that you normally hang out with.

 
At 10 January, 2007 06:06, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Didn't see any statement that says, "Blah Blah, I hate America." Your flawed interpetation yet again. Nice lie!

 
At 10 January, 2007 06:12, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Lying_Dylan said...

W H Y D O N T Y O U D O I T?

D O U C H E B A G

09 January, 2007 19:35
nomoremoonbats said...

I'm just asking for some help. What is wrong with that? Are you a Moonbat? You sure sound like one.


Fighting within the OS movement. Is there a splinter cell on the way?

I can see it now...

Douchebags.org versus Moonbats.com which site has the most bullshit to spread on the net? You decide as we debate the issue at urretarded.com!

First off both bag and bat, Cooperative Research can't really be debunked because it is a timeline from the MSM. The only thing you can do is check the accuracy of the timeline, not the content.

 
At 10 January, 2007 07:52, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Classic OS- "The guys an idiot."

I have nothing to refute his facts so....errr ummm I will call him an idiot, yeah that is the ticket and then I hope he gets beat up!

True summary of the entire OS debate team on this blog.

 
At 10 January, 2007 09:06, Blogger Alex said...

Swinger, buddy, your syntax is starting to fail again. You have a bad habit of flying into a tizzy on occasion, at which times you no longer sound ignorant but rather incoherent. Ignorant swinger is fine, it keeps us all amused. Incoherent swinger sucks; nobody wants to read your attempts at free-association.

 
At 10 January, 2007 10:11, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Alex, sweetheart, where did I fly off into a tizzy?

 
At 10 January, 2007 10:12, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

How is our favorite douchebag Dylan? Your classic brother, true classic.

I liked colisomy bag better by the way. It makes you sound less stupid.

 
At 10 January, 2007 10:42, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Alex, do you ever wonder why none of your OS buddies support your statements unless it is making fun of someone on this blog?

Think hard, brother!



Come on now, I know you can come up with the answer!






Because you have nothing meaningful, factual, or honest to contribute to any dicussion regarding the post that Pat or James write. Hell you can't even argue with logical common sense, nor can you use terms in their proper context.

Take for example Free-Association. Do you know what that means? Two can you explain how I posted in that way?

Three can you explain what your comment has to do with the post, "But They Don't Hate America"?

ADHD is a terrible condition to live in. I recommend seeing a psychotherapist to treat your condition. And one last bit of advice. Stay on topic!

 
At 10 January, 2007 11:22, Blogger Alex said...

Alex, do you ever wonder why none of your OS buddies support your statements unless it is making fun of someone on this blog?

Because generally speaking none of us bother supporting eachother. It's not necessary. Only incompetent idiots like you would require constant cheering from the peanut gallery. The regular commenter here are mature, competent, and secure enough to be able to make their own arguments, and back them up effectively. The only time we bother commenting on eachothers writing is when the writer has made a mistake - then it's only natural to offer a correction.

Seriously, how old are you? That you would even attempt to mock me in such an immature fashion is truly....saddening. I feel embarrassed for you. It reveals a lot about your personality.

Take for example Free-Association. Do you know what that means? Two can you explain how I posted in that way?

Your post was a rambling, incoherent, illogically structured blur of unrelated information combined with horrible grammar. As such, it certainly resembles free-association, although I am ofcourse exaggerating a little.

Three can you explain what your comment has to do with the post, "But They Don't Hate America"?

Nothing whatsoever. In other words, congratulations, you have successfully hijacked this thread. You're still an idiot though.

 
At 10 January, 2007 13:20, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

ADHD - Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder is a clinical diagnosis based on observed and reported behaviors. Unless you are a qualified Health Professional I would avoid diagnosing people with such illnesses, as it is technically ilegal to do so (practicing medicine without a licence)...

TAM;)

 
At 10 January, 2007 14:21, Blogger shawn said...

Fighting within the OS movement. Is there a splinter cell on the way?

Uh you do realize nomoremoonbats is one of you guys trying to be funny, right?

Alex, do you ever wonder why none of your OS buddies support your statements unless it is making fun of someone on this blog?

Alex already explained why your question is moronic, but it's one of the odder things I notice when comparing CTs to rationalists. Even at the forum the rule seems to apply - CTs have to be "backed up" by others of their flock (call in the reinforcements if you will), yet we don't seem to do that "HEY GUYS COME HELP THIS GUY IS OWNING ME". The reason (for the most part) is this - we're the ones who don't have a problem with refutation using logic and evidence, you folks do.

 
At 14 January, 2007 16:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alex.
What is your problem....you really are psycho aren't you.
All I see from you is slimy little attacks on people who have just as much right to post their comments as you do.
Go have a look in the mirror and look at the little man that lurks inside.
You are so precious.

 
At 14 January, 2007 23:05, Blogger Alex said...

All I see from you is slimy little attacks on people who have just as much right to post their comments as you do.

And I have every right to point out how stupid, delusional, and self centred they/you are. Thanks for contributing!

 
At 15 January, 2007 03:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alex

You have an agenda

"It's going to become important to debunk them because they're having a negative effect on many different aspects of US and NATO policies....refer to it as enemy psy-ops.....propaganda designed to damage our government"

The government does a pretty good job of damaging itself.

Now I know why you won't answer relevant questions

There have been some pretty good questions posted on events...and if you have no answer to it you become a depraved little human being sprouting platitudes to cover your own agenda (not to mention insecurity).

GO YOU LONE RANGER AND SAVE THE COUNTRY FROM THOSE COMMIE BASTARDS!

Just a little paranoid and psycho don't you think little man.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home