The Blogger Is Always the Last To Know
Looks like I've repented my Debunker ways and have become a 9-11 Denier, according to this new blog:
It's a new day for this Brainster. For those of you who haven't heard already, James and I have decided to go separate ways. I wish him luck. We had a great run with Screw Loose Change, made a lot of waves, shook up the Internet, but, due a difference of opinion about approach, this is for the best.
I know this blog appears to be attacking my roots. Well, I guess it is, but not the mission of exposing the propaganda, but the MEANS we used. It seemed reasonable at first, all's fair in love and war, as they say. But then we lost our way, drifting from exposing "Loose Change" and it's distortions, that now even the creator's admit, to attacking any 911 truther for any reason whatsoever.
This comes as news to me; I guess the shrink was right when he said I have a split personality disorder. ;)
Actually, of course, this is exactly the same as the fake Nico Haupt blog; somebody's impersonating me for their own idiotic purposes.
A bunch of the Deniers have fallen for this gag, including Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet.
Update: We got mentioned on Alex Jones' show when a caller mentioned this post. Jones went off on a rambling talk about how he didn't want to come to the Phoenix conference but they wheedled him into it, then whined when he cancelled. Jones also claimed that we must be behind the fake blog, that this was some sort of way of getting attention. He also seemed quite depressed, which of course cheered me up to no end.
Update II: Some of the less intelligent Deniers apparently believe that we did this ourselves. Let me point out that I did not post this on 9-11 Blogger, I did not post this on the Loose Change Forum. If you're looking for the people who pulled this stunt, I'd suggest starting with them and find out where they heard about it. For more backup, I'd strongly suggest comparing the "SLC Exposed" blog to the phony "Nico Haupt" blog. Same MO--a fake blog created to apparently apologize for past "sins". Now all you have to do to prove I did it is to come up with some reason why I would have created the fake Nico Haupt blog.
Labels: Fake Blog, Screw Loose Change Exposed
posted by Pat @ 10:31 AM
30 comments
30 Comments:
This the same Paul Joseph Watson who screwed up the London bombings story. More here: http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/alex-jones-is-wrong-on-london-terror.html
"This comes as news to me; I guess the shrink was right when he said I have a split personality disorder. ;)"
Next on Prison Planet: "Debunker Admits Suffering From Mental Illness"
Thx Billy :)
Sounds like the toofers are geting desperate and they can't hide from the lies they post so they try this, the story is just too convenient.
I never had any doubts. Everyone knows the NWO pays much better than those truth turkeys.
How do we know you're the real Pat?
I'm just wondering if Pat is gonna take legal action against this because its against Blogger.com's Terms of Service by impersonating a real person.
I saw someone mention this on the DIGG site.
BG takes aim at Alex Jones
This comment has been removed by the author.
BG i dare you to post that link in the Hoax article comments ;)
Hey Pat, Alex Jones wants you on his show. Preferably today.
Pat,
We'd like you to come on The Alex Jones Show, how's 1pm CST, today 3-14-07. Let me know ASAP.
Thanks,
Kevin Smith
Producer, The Alex Jones Show
kevin@infowars.com
This was posted over at your new blog. ;-)
All you have proven is that you are master liers and also censors of free speech as I see my former comment was deleted. Anyone can lie and make someone believe it and you all have simply proven that you are masters at your deceptive trade. Nice "experiment" as this hoax was characterised on your forum. You have successfully shown your skill in spinning out deceptions...
Now delete this comment as well like a good little fascist.
Retraction:
Sorry - I had posted in the original blogs comments, not this response. I have not been censored. My mistake.
Hahahaha :D
Jay,
I posted the same comment.(At SLCE Blog)
I have no reason to post something here and not there.
@Nicholas: Who's suffering here? Pat seems somewhat amused by the whole thing. He could simply have the impersonator's account and blog removed if he's so inclined.
I have submitted a complaint about SLCE to Blogger; we'll see what happens. Given that the fake Nico blog is still going, I don't have high hopes that it will be "pulled" any time soon.
lol you wish 911coverup
What a sad, pathetic response by the Twoofers. Searching for the truth...when it fits into their worldview. HI-O!
All the toofers do is whine and never back up anything they say with hard facts
Whether it was pat or it was a prankster, the person spoke the damn truth about this blog.
Does it hurt being as stupid as you?
I fell for it myself and I'm smart. First thing, no coffee yet... Shoulda known better.
"Fake, but accurate": the eternal refrain of the clueless.
Just how stupid are these people? Didn't it occur to them to check that the fake blog is based on a different profile than either of Pat's blogs? Wow, with such crack investigative reporting I am just stunned they haven't broken the whole 9/11 thing wide open.
It is still pretty amusing to read in the third person how we are having some sort of dispute. I have been too busy eating Peking duck and slamming down bottles of Tsing Tao.
BTW you can't access the Loose Change Forum from China. At least the commies have some taste.
I fell for it myself and I'm smart.
Uhhh... no.
I bet that you are so frakking stupid, that if I told you that 10,000 men could go through the worlds biggest and busiest office towers tearing everything up, installing tens of thousand of charges, more than a hundred miles of primacord, putting everything back together again, and use a completely untested technology to break the world record for controlled demolition by more than double the previous record three times in a single day without anyone noticing... that you'd probably believe it.
You're just that dumb.
and I'm smart.
Judging by your blogger profile and your blogs, this statement is a lie.
Immitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
TAM:)
So I guy named Jordan did not contact you? And you are not Pat Curley,(not Curtiss, as some have stated) and I was born on March 4th, 1955?
Well, the 101st fighting Keyboardists are effectively endorsed by Centcom. Screwloose change runs the logo. And the Chief's brief is blantently endorsed by 101st right wing keyboardists, and is hosted by the same "James B". \
Hi, xxxx:
I caught your post about the 101st Fighting Keyboardists. Good luck with the project! I’m not sure if you have been to the US Central Command website but we regularly post news, photos, audio and video from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. You (and your fellow bloggers) are welcome to use any materials you find on our site. If you’d like to receive the weekly electronic newsletter and monthly Coalition Bulletin, just ask.
If you could add a link to CENTCOM, it’d be appreciated (I’m trying to spread the word about our site!). I’ve attached the CENTCOM logo, should you want to use it with the link. Thanks!
SPC C. Flowers
CENTCOM Public Affairs
So I guy named Jordan did not contact you? And you are not Pat Curley,(not Curtiss, as some have stated) and I was born on March 4th, 1955?
Huh? Maybe if you structured your sentences like a normal human we could understand what the hell you where saying. Is your keyboard messed up or are you that insane? Where you born in 55?
At ease atheist soldier. Apparently, you are not up to speed. There was another blog started called http://screwloosechangeexposed.blogspot.com/
A person purporting to be "Pat" stated that he and "JamesB" had parted ways. However, this is supposedly a hoax, so i am just asking if this Pat is Pat C*****, and not some other Pat, and if this Pat would be willing to sue the other blogger for theft of identity and the tort of false light? Does that clear it up atheist soldier?
Seeing as how the Pat on this blog has stated about getting SLCE taken down its pretty obvious that this is the real Pat. If you really wanted to know the identity of the Pat at SLCE, I would ask it on that blog. Your sentence structure makes it hard to understand the point your trying to make.
Your messed up phrasing:
So I guy named Jordan did not contact you? And you are not Pat Curley,(not Curtiss, as some have stated) and I was born on March 4th, 1955?
Proper phrasing:
So a guy named Jordan did not contact you? And you are Pat Curley, not Curtiss, as some have stated. Were you born on March 4th, 1955?
Post a Comment
<< Home