Friday, April 13, 2007

Best. Rebuttal. Ever.

Bill Whittle is one of the most amazing writers in the blogosphere, and he turns his awesome powers of logic and critical thinking on the subject of 9-11 and other conspiracy theories.

"This is the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel," she said. This is a statement of such pristine and perfect idiocy that it surely must be emblazoned in stone across the entrance to the Physics Imbecile wing of the Moron Museum of Natural History. But mastery of physics and engineering requires some intelligence, some perseverance and some discipline: none of which are in evidence in this buffoon. Everything is a conspiracy to a mind this far gone. The 15 British sailors kidnapped at sea? All a plan by our evil (but incompetent!) government to get the next war it so desperately needs. “Gulf of Tonkin! Google It, people!” she said on national TV.

And I will, Rosie. I promise. As soon as I finish googling MAD COW DISEASE.


I cannot recommend this post highly enough. Thanks SFC B, Kenny and Mike for pointing this out to me via email.

Labels: , , ,

25 Comments:

At 13 April, 2007 10:44, Blogger CHF said...

"This is the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel"

Makes you wonder how we make stuff out of steel, doesn't it?

 
At 13 April, 2007 11:14, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I usually get the WTC Leprochauns to melt my steel.

TAM:)

 
At 13 April, 2007 11:22, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

They use thermite of course, everyone knows thermite melts steel!

 
At 13 April, 2007 11:39, Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 13 April, 2007 11:40, Blogger Unknown said...

In the link you posted for Bill Whittle, he writes:

Quote

Recently, Rosie O’Donnell said on national television that she believes 9/11 was orchestrated by the US government.

endquote

Rosie has not said this. Bill Whittle is mistaken. If he gets the most fundamental details wrong, it doesn't look too good for his overall argument. Isn't that the point that this blog propounds at every turn?

 
At 13 April, 2007 11:45, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Great point, BG. That is exactly what the talking heads everywhere have tried to assert. She even stated she didn't believe that. Why would he lie about what Rosie said? I just don't understand! ;)

I also like the entire strawman arguement to lump 9/11 into other conspiracies.

 
At 13 April, 2007 12:20, Blogger CHF said...

So WTC7 was a demolition but the government didn't do it?

Hmmmm....

 
At 13 April, 2007 12:21, Blogger CHF said...

Hey did Rosie go to Harvard yet?

 
At 13 April, 2007 12:50, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

So who does Rosie blame? The jews? The Lizard People? Inquiring minds demand to know!

 
At 13 April, 2007 14:03, Blogger Unknown said...

Rosie is taking the Sgt. Joe Friday approach......

 
At 13 April, 2007 14:13, Blogger 911_truthiness said...

...."Rosie has not said this. Bill Whittle is mistaken. If he gets the most fundamental details wrong, it doesn't look too good for his overall argument. Isn't that the point that this blog propounds at every turn?".....

Well this is sort of like when conservatives say Bush never said Sudam was in on 911.

Sure never say it directly but infer it when ever you can. How many times did bush use Sudam or Iraq in the same sentence as 911 or terrorist? Plenty!

Now you have Rosie inferring her questions about 911 and proving an excuse to go to war.

Are you saying Rosie is inferring Islamic terrorist planted bombs in WTC7?

 
At 13 April, 2007 14:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Van Romero revealed as pre-9/11 Directed Energy Panelist
Wild Goose Scammer from the start?
More U.S. Companies also linked to pre-9/11 DirEN Projects
http://www.911researchers.com/node/403#comment-2963

 
At 13 April, 2007 14:27, Blogger 911_truthiness said...

....."I also like the entire strawman arguement to lump 9/11 into other conspiracies."...

No I is to show how stupid and uncritical these people are in their thought process. Much like your own belief in Chemtrails. It shows your inability to discern fact from fiction, Your lack of scientific knowledge. If you had the knowledge you would clearly see how impossible your slow motion basement bomb is, just like how impossible the Chemtrail farce is. Sorry your an idiot, come back when you can think.

And it is fair to analyze the thinking skills of the people who want to give you info. If you can be suckered into believing in a fake moon landing then you are open to all sorts of nonsense.

Now if i were in charge of hiring for a company I would ask people their views on 911 and JFK. It would give one a clear indicator of the persons ability to think with clear rational mind and not a gullible buffoon who will buy anything.

 
At 13 April, 2007 15:47, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

Like a guy coming back from the dead 2000 years ago.

 
At 13 April, 2007 17:58, Blogger shawn said...

Like a guy coming back from the dead 2000 years ago.

What the hell is that for? This isn't a religious discussion.

(Humanist here.)

 
At 14 April, 2007 06:56, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

9/11 Truthy why do you want to call victims who survived and those who suffered terrible injuries from the basement blasts liars?

I really have no idea why you would do that.

What is your motive for doing so?

As far as chemtrail goes I would refer you to chemical and lab tests done on residue from said trails. Tests that show elevated levels of particular chemicals.

Your display of ignorance on the issue is really overwhelming. I would encourge you to read Dr. Edward Teller's, former director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipient, Physicist, and "Father of Hydrogen Bomb" produced a white paper on ways to combat global warming. To sum the paper up for you, he and his peers advocated a 'scattering' of chemicals in the Earth's stratosphere with the most cost effective method being wide-body passenger aircraft at .3 cents per pound. Source:
Global Warming and Ice Ages:
I. Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change
This paper was prepared for submittal to the
22nd International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies
Erice (Sicily), Italy
August 20-23, 1997

To sum it up, I really can't forgive you for spouting BS from someone else who spouts BS that is your best method I suppose.

Now quote to me again who lacks scientific knowledge on the matter of chemtrails? Go read kid, and be vewy vewy quite when calling me out on an issue. Did you hear that slap? ;)

 
At 14 April, 2007 07:09, Blogger CHF said...

9/11 Truthy why do you want to call victims who survived and those who suffered terrible injuries from the basement blasts liars?

You gonna explain the nature of those injuries at some point, Swing?

I've only asked 3 times.

It's almost as if you know the answer is inconsistent with a bomb blast.

 
At 14 April, 2007 07:21, Blogger Alex said...

9/11 Truthy why do you want to call victims who survived and those who suffered terrible injuries from the basement blasts liars?

Because they're either lying, or their statements are being misrepresented by you. I don't care enough to go and figure out which of those is the actual case, and I'm sure everyone else feels the same way. You've lost all credibility, so nobody bothers looking up your idiotic claims any more. Especially when they're so blatantly nonsensical.

As far as chemtrail goes I would refer you to chemical and lab tests done on residue from said trails. Tests that show elevated levels of particular chemicals.

Yes, ofcourse. Now if only we could have the chemical analysis from your blood test...

 
At 14 April, 2007 07:43, Blogger CHF said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 14 April, 2007 07:43, Blogger CHF said...

Swing won't listen to us when it comes to his basement bombs, so maybe he'll listen to one of his own.
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/basementbombs.html

But I doubt it.

 
At 14 April, 2007 08:52, Blogger Unknown said...

Chemtrails is a bigger bunch of BS than than the moon landing conspiricy

 
At 14 April, 2007 19:54, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

What the hell is that for? This isn't a religious discussion.

It's a completely irrational that it's perfectly acceptable to hold.


To sum the paper up for you, he and his peers advocated a 'scattering' of chemicals in the Earth's stratosphere with the most cost effective method being wide-body passenger aircraft at .3 cents per pound.

"Someone once suggested it" is pretty far from "it is happening".

 
At 15 April, 2007 05:18, Blogger 911_truthiness said...

"Now quote to me again who lacks scientific knowledge on the matter of chemtrails? Go read kid, and be vewy vewy quite when calling me out on an issue. Did you hear that slap? ;)"

AH... I got you mad now. Well so what. Whats the matter boy? Burn you on the Slow motion basement bomb" thing? Go cry to your mom and tell her the big bad debunker is picking on you.

See I will always pick on people like you, and I will always point out the holes in your so called logic. And I can do it so easily because I am smarter then you. The fact you believe in something so loopy as chemtrails simple proves that.

Funny how none of the pilots or ground crew notice all that chemicals on the planes. Can you see the pilot now "HOLY SHIT WHAT'S ALL THAT SPRAY COMING OUT OF MY JET?"

Also note that Dr. Edward Teller's ideas is to COMBAT global warming and that pilots would KNOW their jets are spraying chemicals.

See.. I showed you how to think again. Well lesson over for today son, I will catch you next time.

 
At 15 April, 2007 05:56, Blogger 911_truthiness said...

Swing. I see from your blog:

Astrological Sign: Virgo
Zodiac Year: Boar

Favorite Film: JFK

911 Truth, Astrology, JFK Plot, and Chemtrails.

Are there any goofy ideas you DON'T believe in?

 
At 15 April, 2007 16:25, Blogger Civilized Worm said...

He also loves Braveheart and The Patriot. I guess he has a thing for historically inaccurate films.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home