Monday, April 16, 2007

A Defense of Rosie

Nope, I didn't write, it, but Debunking 911 did.

As I mentioned over at JREF, I'm glad somebody wrote this piece even though I disagree with it at least in part. A lot depends on what Rosie does over the next few months.

Labels: ,

8 Comments:

At 16 April, 2007 18:56, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

So, Pat, surely Jimbo has been whining about how I'm hounding him for chickening out here and there.

Why don't you come to his rescue?

It's alright--I don't like him much, either. ;-)

 
At 16 April, 2007 20:00, Blogger Manny said...

Well, their defense boils down to "Rosie is very, very stupid." I agree with that, and believe further that her pronounced case of PEST is magnifying her stupidity. So maybe in that sense she's to be pitied.

But here's the thing. Every single weekday morning she walks into a building filled with alleged professional journalists. She works on a show which, while light on 'hard' journalism, doubtless employs at least a few researchers. And of course because of her undeniable success as a comedian, movie star and talk show host she has millions and millions of dollars at her personal disposal. Politicians up to the level of Senator who disagree with the president on almost every issue of the day would happily return a phone call from her. Hell, prior to her libeling him, Larry Silverstein would probably have returned a call from her. He still might.

She has easier access to people to do research for her and an easier ability to do research on her own than just about anybody on the planet. How much slack are we supposed to cut someone like that? Either BDS is a bit of fun had by Republicans or it is a real, diagnosable disease which appears to require mandatory treatment including, possibly, confinement a la mental patients. I believe it is the former, not the latter, and that so-called "sufferers" of this syndrome should continue to be held accountable for their actions.

 
At 16 April, 2007 21:00, Blogger Unknown said...

I don't want her fired but that doesn't mean I respect her. I have no respect for individuals that willingly give up their rational faculties just so they can hate a little more.

 
At 17 April, 2007 06:22, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

The contradiction of debunks:

"The America I grew up in was an example of freedom to the world. As long as it doesn't affect ones job, we should be able to say anything we want about a major event, (As long as it respects the memories of the people who died on 9/11) without repercussions." From debunking 9/11.

Anyone else see a problem with this?
We should be able to say anything we want as long as it respects memories. LOL! The dumb shit who wrote this then of course doesn't believe we should have the right to say anything we want. No wonder public education gets a bad rap
with this type of intellect in the public domain.

Don't get me wrong I'm not chuckling about memories I'm rolling because of the logic in one simple paragraph. I guess it takes a contradictory nature to be debunker.

 
At 17 April, 2007 08:12, Blogger Unknown said...

SD,

Great Comment!

 
At 17 April, 2007 11:13, Blogger The Reverend Schmitt., FCD. said...

The dumb shit who wrote this then of course doesn't believe we should have the right to say anything we want.

Straw man, he said that you should be able to say what you want 'without repercussions' as long as memories are respected. He does not assert or imply that it is therefore acceptable for the government to restrict your speech in the case that you don't: as the recent Imus brouhaha has shown, repercussions can take a myriad of fashions. There is no contradiction.

 
At 17 April, 2007 11:46, Blogger Der Bruno Stroszek said...

Yeah, Swing, surely that comment can only be arguing in favour of the black helicopters coming down and disappearing anyone who disrespects the dead. Congratulations. Once again, you have uncovered the truth. I eagerly await the moment when, five years later, you get off your lazy arse and do something about it.

 
At 25 April, 2007 15:59, Blogger Jenny Quarx said...

I do not endorse the message that follows. I appologize if anyone is offended or frightened. However it is the example of the sort of thing self appointed debunkers feel is an acceptable way to attack 911activists.

>>>Thursday, April 19, 2007
Jenny Sparks. Wouldn't it be Great?

Wouldn't it be great to wake up with the following news....

Jenny Sparks found dead. Each of her nipples had been bitten off. Her left eyeball had been removed with a pair of tweezers. Two fingers on each hand, along with two toes on each foot had been cut off with scissors. She layed sprawled out on the floor. Her arms nailed to the floor, crucifiction style. Carved into her torso were the word "DIE TWOOFERS" over and over again. The official cause of death was drowning. Her lips had been superglued together and a continuous flow of water was seeped into her nostrils.

Wouldn't it be great?........<<<

You can find the original at



http://killtwoofers.blogspot.com/


Note--to the best of my knowledge not ONE debunk has flagged this blog or complained to Google--the most efficient way to catch the perp, even if it really was me, as they claim.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home