Saturday, February 27, 2010

Agreeing with Our Rebunkers

Over at the inaptly named 9-11 Debunkers blog, we get slapped down a bit for laughing at Steven Jones' speculation that the Haiti quake was created by the New World Order.

Haiti? A false flag? What kind of crazy person would think that?! A drill goes live and a bunch of mass murdering war criminals and celebrity whores beg the public to donate money to support the militarization of an oil rich island. Nothing suspicious there! I haven't seen such a sickening display of vampiric exploitation since Michael Jackson's funeral. And if they could blow up skyscrapers with nanotechnology back in 2001, the idea of them being able to create earthquakes in 2010 isn't much of a stretch. Hell, there's a publicly available US Air Force document that seriously discusses the prospect of teleportation! This is what's out in the open. Imagine the black projects going on in the ultra secret underground laboratories!


Now that's a bunch of crazy talk of course. I assume that the teleportation document is thoroughly speculative, and "Beam me up, Scotty," will not be practical at any point in the near future. Note as well that the "false flag" bit is rather amusing; the false flag for the Haiti earthquake is, well, Mother Nature.

But I do have to agree with them on this point:
...if they could blow up skyscrapers with nanotechnology back in 2001, the idea of them being able to create earthquakes in 2010 isn't much of a stretch.

Yep, both of those seem equally practical. BTW, note that like most "Truth" sites, they don't care for free speech:
I spend far too much time spelling out for people what I have already spelled out hundreds of times. Comments are now closed.

Labels: , ,

111 Comments:

At 27 February, 2010 10:12, Anonymous Lucifer said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 27 February, 2010 10:44, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Well, did raging hemorhoid finally go completely insane?

Pitiful, just pitiful.

 
At 27 February, 2010 11:10, Anonymous New Yorker said...

I think the guys in charge of the HAARP machine need to re-calibrate it a bit. First of all, that 8.8 that struck Chile was waaay more powerful than it should have been. Hawaii is going to get a tsunami, ferchrissakes.

Furthermore, they missed the target, Caracas, by thousands of miles. Heads need to roll for this one.

 
At 27 February, 2010 12:44, Anonymous Marc said...

I'm in my third year of college working towards a marine geology major. To be blunt, we cannot cause earthquakes on the magnatude of Haiti.

This would require knowledge about the movement of the plates that we do not have. It would also require power they don't even have on Star Trek.

Finally, some of the best geological and seismological minds in the world are out here in the Cal and UC system. They work every day to solve the riddles that the tectonic plates present us. There is no such thing as secret knowledge. If HAARP is really doing what the kooks say it does then that scientific theory has also been discovered by other scientists. These things don't happen in a vaccuum. Every major scientific developement from Darwin, the radio, the airplane, and the lightbulb was being developed by mulitpile scientists at the exact same time. As information developes the best minds then apply that new information and the ball moves forward.

Puh-leeez

 
At 27 February, 2010 13:00, Anonymous KDLarsen said...

Oil? What oil? If Haiti had any significant amount of oil, they wouldn't be one of the poorest countries on earth.

 
At 27 February, 2010 13:26, Anonymous paul w said...

Marc said...
"some of the best geological and seismological minds in the world are out here in the Cal and UC system"


Yes, but the most EVIL are at work in the deep underground caverns of the NWO, maybe even in the one they have directly under WTC7 in New York.

(How did you think they got all the explosives inside the building without anyone knowing?)

You're just another sheepie.

It wasn't Nano-thermite on 9-11, that's just a red herring to keep the masses divided, it was nano-termites; specially-bred minute steel-eating termites developed in Area 51 from our Alien controllers.

They got rid of that steel, pretty quick, eh? And, did they do any tests for microscopic, steel-eating termites? No!

They developed HAARP for 'earthquakes', are working on brain implants for all civilians (via nano-chips in 'pharmaceutical' drugs) and, once the sheep are watching 'TV' and getting brain-washed, will use teleportation to bring in all the aliens from the others worlds to finally enslave us all.

And will the 'media' report this?

No!!!!

 
At 27 February, 2010 13:40, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"...working on brain implants for all civilians (via nano-chips in 'pharmaceutical' drugs) and, once the sheep are watching 'TV' and getting brain-washed,"

HAH!

Not ME, baby, I'm READY:

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

 
At 27 February, 2010 15:07, Blogger NoIdentity said...

Oil? What oil? If Haiti had any significant amount of oil, they wouldn't be one of the poorest countries on earth.
It would still be poor but it's elites would have fleets of Mercedes, Lear Jets and Swiss Bank accounts. Not that I'm a cynic or anything.

I once read about a successful teleportation experiment. It involved "teleporting" an electron or some subatomic particle. It really just made one electron disappear and created another identical one in another location. Quantum mechanics are pretty damn cool.
DARPA has looked into all kinds of wacky ideas, that doesn't mean they have a working teleporter. There's speculation, wild speculation, and 9-11 truthers.

 
At 27 February, 2010 15:22, Blogger Triterope said...

Haiti would still be poor but it's elites would have fleets of Mercedes, Lear Jets and Swiss Bank accounts. Not that I'm a cynic or anything.

SEE ALSO: Nigeria.

 
At 27 February, 2010 17:11, Blogger James B. said...

LOL I love how he links to Simon Cowell being involved. And don't even get me started about that bitch Paula Abdul!

 
At 27 February, 2010 22:22, Anonymous Lucifer said...

James, let Jesus fuck you! Let him fuck you! Lick me!

 
At 28 February, 2010 00:41, Blogger thecard51short said...

Hey guys! I went over to Alexa and checked your results with the nutty PrisonPlanet guys that nobody but loonies agree with!

Looks like...ummm...you guys aren't even ranked and Prison Planet and Infowars get only about 5 million more visitors a week then you guys!

Keep it up! Your message is really getting out! hahahahahahahah

 
At 28 February, 2010 00:43, Blogger thecard51short said...

Sorry for the double comment...i just wanted to rush you guys some great news!

You guys are now the 101,899 biggest website in the Philippines!

Way to go!

ahahhaahhahahhahahah

 
At 28 February, 2010 01:48, Anonymous sockpuppet all in your face said...

a few questions that SLC doesn't touch....

1. Can anyone name one single person fired or reprimanded within the U.S. government (FBI, CIA, NORAD, FAA, NSA, or Bush Administration) for the 9/11 attacks.


2. NORAD is responsible for air defense, how many contradictory explanations did NORAD give for their failure to intercept any planes on 9/11?


3. It is an established fact that NORAD is responsible for air defenses and no planes on 9/11 were even intercepted despite the fact this is standard procedure.

 
At 28 February, 2010 02:43, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'1. Can anyone explain single person fired or reprimanded within the U.S. government (FBI, CIA, NORAD, FAA, NSA, or Bush Administration) for the 9/11 attacks.'

Why is this relevant?

'2. NORAD is responsible for air defense, how many contradictory explanations did NORAD give for their failure to intercept any planes on 9/11?'

NORAD also happens to be a bi-national command, with a Canadian Forces 2 Star as its Deputy CINC. If you're implying that NORAD was deliberately stood down on 9/11, then why didn't anyone on the Canuck side of the command notice anything amiss?

'3. It is an established fact that NORAD is responsible for air defenses'

Wrong. NORAD was responsible for 'air sovereignty' missions, involving repelling incursions by foreign aircraft into US air space. It's domestic air defence mandate was expanded after 9/11.

'and no planes on 9/11 were even intercepted despite the fact this is standard procedure.'

The air defence set-up for the entire North-Eastern seaboard consisted of four ANG jets, which were scrambled shortly after the FAA notified NORAD of the hijackings. Interception was not 'standard procedure'. You truthers ought to check your facts before you post:

http://debunk911myths.org/topics/NORAD
http://debunk911myths.org/topics/NORAD_background
http://web.archive.org/web/20030309113608/www.senate.gov/~armed_services/statemnt/2002/March/Eberhart.pdf

'Keep it up! Your message is really getting out! hahahahahahahah'

8 1/2 years on, how much progress has the 'truth movement' made?

 
At 28 February, 2010 02:51, Anonymous sparky76 said...

Who cares about those filthy liars sack, i don`t. They`re so boring and don`t bring anything new to the table, But i do get shits in giggles from smacking them down. It makes no sense to waste my time on them yet i will be here till the end of time. Are you with me?

 
At 28 February, 2010 07:06, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Looks like...ummm...you guys aren't even ranked and Prison Planet and Infowars get only about 5 million more visitors a week then you guys!

Right, because the fact that more people visit Alex Jones' sites than this one means....9/11 was an inside job?

You're going to have to explain your logic to me on this one, pal.

 
At 28 February, 2010 07:12, Anonymous New Yorker said...

OT, but did Roid Rage get banned? He usually can't go more than 3 minutes without some spittle-flecked post here.

 
At 28 February, 2010 07:44, Anonymous Anonymous said...

sackcloth and ashes said...
'1. Can anyone explain single person fired or reprimanded within the U.S. government (FBI, CIA, NORAD, FAA, NSA, or Bush Administration) for the 9/11 attacks.'

Why is this relevant?

why do you think it's not relevant?
mindy kleinberg will answer your question at the end of this reply.



NORAD also happens to be a bi-national command, with a Canadian Forces 2 Star as its Deputy CINC. If you're implying that NORAD was deliberately stood down on 9/11, then why didn't anyone on the Canuck side of the command notice anything amiss?

pick a number, it's easy. do you have trouble debunking basic math? did the FAA tell one story and stick to it? did they tell two stories before they decided on an official version? why do keep dodging questions? oh yea new investigation DER DER NEW DER INVESTIGATION DER would answer i'm sure.

Wrong. NORAD was responsible for 'air sovereignty' missions, involving repelling incursions by foreign aircraft into US air space. It's domestic air defence mandate was expanded after 9/11.

The air defence set-up for the entire North-Eastern seaboard consisted of four ANG jets, which were scrambled shortly after the FAA notified NORAD of the hijackings. Interception was not 'standard procedure'.

'Keep it up! Your message is really getting out! hahahahahahahah'

8 1/2 years on, how much progress has the 'truth movement' made?

since no one around here can debunk shit, as usual. just ask questions like the rest of us, and then ridicule those who think the people hurt by the attacks of 9/11 deserve an actual investigation.

on 9/11 the procedures that were in place were not followed.

“Consider that an aircraft emergency exists ... when: ...There is unexpected loss of radar contact and radio communications with any ...aircraft.” —FAA Order 7110.65M 10-2-5 (6)

“If ... you are in doubt that a situation constitutes an emergency or potential emergency, handle it as though it were an emergency.” —FAA Order 7110.65M 10-1-1-c (7)

look it up: http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/FAAprotocol.htm

i guess i have to answer my own question because you don't think it's relevant

the answer is zero, no one from the CIA,FBI, or NSA, was fired, punished or reprimanded for what happened on 9/11.

i'll ask one more question, but i'll give you the answer so you can debunk it, ok?

how many days was it before someone responsible for the tragic events of 9/11 was promoted?

three, it was three days before richard myers, the military officer in charge of NORAD was promoted.

“It has been said that the intelligence agencies have to be right 100% of the time. And the terrorists only have to get lucky once. This explanation for the devastating attacks of September 11th, simple on its face, is wrong in its value, because the 9-11 terrorists were not just lucky once. They were lucky over and over again. When you have this repeated pattern of broken protocols, broken laws, broken communication, one cannot still call it luck. If at some point, we don’t look to hold the individuals accountable for not doing their jobs, properly, then how can we ever expect for terrorists to not get lucky again?" - mindy kleinberg.

but you're probably still wondering how this question is even relevant, right?

debunkers never touch this, they're too chicken shit. just like they're too chicken shit to bring up kurt haskell and the well dressed man i saw you faggots posting here a few weeks ago.

debunk away bitches.......:)

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...3. It is an established fact that NORAD is responsible for air defenses and no planes on 9/11 were even intercepted despite the fact this is standard procedure."



"...Flight 11 would have been intercepted by fighter jets within 10 minutes of any sign that it may have been hijacked." -- David Ray Grifter, lying his @$$ off in "The New Pearl Harbor".


Payne Stewart’s Learjet 35, registration N47BA, flew across several states before crashing on October 25, 1999. According to the NTSB communication with the aircraft was lost at 9:33 EDT. A test pilot from the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, reached the Learjet at 9:54 CDT--a full 81 minutes after initial communication was lost.

[1] Flight A11 was hijacked at 8:13 EDT and crashed at 8:46 EDT, which is a duration of 33 minutes.

[2] Flight UA175 was hijacked at 8:47 EDT and crashed at 9:03 EDT, which is a duration of 16 minutes.

[3] Flight AA77 was hijacked at 8:56 EDT and crashed at 9:37 EDT, which is a duration of 41 minutes.

[4] Flight UA 93 was hijacked at 9:28 EDT and crashed at 10:03 EDT, which is a duration of 35 minutes.

The fact is that the intercept of Stewart’s Learjet took twice as long as the longest hijack duration on 911.

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And I neglected to mention that Payne Stewart’s Learjet 35 had its transponder turned on, which made tracking the Learjet relatively simple.

On 9/11, the hijackers turned the aircrafts' transponders off.

Now tell us conspiratards, do you think that turning the transponders off may have increased the difficulty of NORAD's mission on that fateful day?

Idiots.

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:41, Blogger Billman said...

And.. just what is it that we "too chicken shit" debunkers afraid of happening?

Half the time, you loser anonymous blowhards come in here all hot and bothered about something you think finally cracks the case wide open for an inside job, and it's something Pat and James have already talked about.. in 2006.. and 2007.. and by 2008 and having dealth with repeat subjects being brought forth by new anonymous douchewads, people just didn't care anymore about what you troofers think.

But seriously, what is it that are we are supposed to be "afraid of" by not responding to your speculative bullshit?

I don't underestand your logic. What do debunkers have to "fear" from your questions?

OH NO! The Barry Jennings testimony! They ruined us all!

OH NO!! THE NORMAN MINTEA TESTIMONY! I'm gonna shit my pants!

The only people "scared" are you troofers. I mean, come on, this is just a BLOG run by two people and you psychos get so uptight about every post they make... this isn't DEBUNKER H.Q. or anything. Its just the the opinions of Pat and James and their followers (as in blog followers, not "sheeple") who comment on them.

I suspect the only real reason it's so popular with you troofers is because its the only forum on the internet that I know of where you can freely spew your drivel and not get banned. So ironically, you simply coming here to rant and rave and burn off your excess estrogen from that sand collected in your vaginas is actually making a simple blog by two guys the number one troofer target to "take out."


Troofers claim to be for rights and free speech, just so long as it's what they want you to say. You guys are worse than Nazis. How many more musuems do you need to shoot up before you come up with a theory that involves Aliens? Or did I miss that one already...

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:45, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'it was three days before richard myers, the military officer in charge of NORAD was promoted.'

Another lie to be addressed. General Myers was CINC NORAD from August 1998-February 2000. But then what are facts to a truther?

You still haven't told us if the Canadians were 'in' on the 'inside job' or not. In fact, you've dodged just about all the points I made. Why am I not surprised?

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:48, Blogger Billman said...

Troofer pussies are "too chicken shit" to ever respond once someone has bitch-slapped their theories with non-retard logic and and actual legitimate source to back up their argument.

They just run away, jack off to themselves in the mirror, come up with something "new" and come back here and claim we can't debunk something that's already been debunked years ago... refuse to respond to it, claim we "can't debunk shit," and then repeat the process.

Why not, Jon Gold does it here all the time. Only he adds the little childish "You're all liars!" Touch before he runs away..

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Which is why the Russians build transponders into their fighter jets, to help NORAD out in event of an invasion.

The Russians wouldn't want NORAD to lose track of their fighters.

Of course, as soon as said Russian fighters cross the border into American territory, they are essentially "lost" in the soup of commercial air traffic and America is completely defenseless.

Scrambling fighter jets in order to intercept such Russian aircraft might take up to five hours, after flying erratically in all different directions without afterburner, inasmuch as they aren't hampered further by exercises involving Russian fighter jets inserted as false radar blips, something that one would expect to "enhance" response.

There only so much NORAD can do, and they should be forgiven for telling lies at least twice, after all leaving the country defenseless is the best way to get promoted these days!

 
At 28 February, 2010 08:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yep. Building a transponder into your fighter jets to help enemy radar track you. It's the decent thing to do.

Flight 77 was being very indecent. Bad flight 77! Bad 757! Bad!

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:01, Anonymous New Yorker said...

I'm confused. Is the "anonymous" above suggesting we were attacked by Russian fighter jets coming across the Artic Ocean on 9/11? Or is he just babbling about nothing like most "truthers" do?

I will tell you one thing: a MiG-29 hitting the WTC probably wouldn't have resulted in the building's collapse.

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:02, Blogger angrysoba said...

Oh yeah? And when are you guys gonna debunk the keymaster, Willie Rodriguez?

[/twoof]

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:08, Blogger angrysoba said...

Has anyone here heard of Lori Price at Citizens for Legitimate Government?

She/They are utterly nuts and have decided that HAARP was resposible for the earthquake off Chile.

The US also invented disease according to the archives. Everything from AIDS to autism to ebola.

And look at its blogroll!

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:15, Blogger Billman said...

Why would we ever track Russian fighter jets? Their ranges are severly limited, and unless they're being launched from a carrier, which we would have detected through SOSUS about 500 miles before it ever got near our coast, I don't think any MiG is gonna fly by itself across the Atlantic, Pacific, or over the Pole without a huge radar target like a tanker that would be needed to fuel the gas guzzler on it's long ass journey here..

Or maybe you meant to say say Russian Bomber? Backfires are nice huge detectable radar targets, that's why they fly low and then swoop up on afterburners when they get in range...

But don't let facts or logic get in the way of your self-righteous ranting, troof-tards.

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:21, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Which is why the Russians build transponders into their fighter jets, to help NORAD out in event of an invasion."

And the Russians would sent fighter jets into US airspace.....why?

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:29, Anonymous sock puppet all in your face said...

when you say you're too chicken shit to touch kurt haskell and well dressed man is because you are, or you would debunk what he says.

as far as richard myers goes: He was the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) during the September 11th, 2001, terror attacks because CJCS Shelton was en route to Europe. However, at the time the Pentagon was attacked, he was on Capitol Hill and not in the Pentagon. It should be noted that he did leave Capitol Hill and spent the remainder of the day in the Pentagon. His office was not damaged during the attack. While in charge of American Air Defenses on September 11, 2001; Myers was not court-marshaled and shot for dereliction of duty, rather he remarkably was promoted to the highest position in the military; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

look it up geniuses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Myers#Commander_and_Chairman

seriously, you kids consider yourselves intellectuals?

first you answer the question with a question about canadians or some moronic shit.

answer: who the fuck cares about canadians, it was an american general who was asleep at the wheel and who should not have been promoted.

another question you probably won't answer, if canada is all up americas shit like you say, why didn't they send jets to help up? obviously something was amiss on 9/11, there's planes being flown into buildings and shit, why didn't the canucks notice it? riddle me that fucktard

you and every apologist like you shit on people like mindy kleinberg and everyone like her who seek answers and want to make sure this never happens again.

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:35, Blogger angrysoba said...

obviously something was amiss on 9/11, there's planes being flown into buildings and shit, why didn't the canucks notice it? riddle me that fucktard



Your "argument":

9/11 couldn't have happened because...like...NORAD!

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:36, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lazarus Long said...
"Anonymous said...
Which is why the Russians build transponders into their fighter jets, to help NORAD out in event of an invasion."

And the Russians would sent fighter jets into US airspace.....why?

oh dumb, dumb, to fight the terrorists, right?

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:44, Anonymous sock puppet all in your face said...

angrysoba said...
obviously something was amiss on 9/11, there's planes being flown into buildings and shit, why didn't the canucks notice it? riddle me that fucktard



Your "argument":

9/11 couldn't have happened because...like...NORAD!

i will use little words to try and help you learn.
i am not asking


"Your "argument":

9/11 couldn't have happened because...like...NORAD!"

my question, that means what i want you to tell me is; why was richard myers promoted?
did he do a good job that day?

if you have a hard time understanding what i asked, please get a grown up to help you read it, ok?

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:46, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"when you say you're too chicken shit to touch kurt haskell and well dressed man is because you are, or you would debunk what he says."

Nobody cares.

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:49, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"my question, that means what(sic) i (sic) want you to tell me is (sic) ; (sic) why was richard myers promoted?"

Because it was his turn.

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:50, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"...who the fuck cares about canadians"

Hockey fans.

Remeber, Bobby Clark was from Flin Flon, Mainitoba.

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:53, Blogger angrysoba said...

why was richard myers promoted?
did he do a good job that day?


I've no idea. Maybe because it wasn't what he did or did not do on the day but maybe what they expected him to do in the future.

When General MacArthur lost the Philippines he was given tea and medals and promoted to Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in the Southwest Pacific Area.

Would you like to explain why that was or do you think it proves the fall of the Phillipines was an inside job?

 
At 28 February, 2010 09:56, Blogger angrysoba said...

Who the fuck put this in the Wikipedia pages?

"While in charge of American Air Defenses on September 11, 2001; Myers was not court-marshaled and shot for dereliction of duty, rather he remarkably was promoted to the highest position in the military; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Myers

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The sock puppet scribbles, "...when you say you're too chicken shit to touch kurt haskell and well dressed man is because you are, or you would debunk what he says."

I'll assume you're concerned with Northwest Airlines Flight 253.

That said, the anti-Semitic wing of the "9/11 truth movement" claims that Farouk Umar AbdulMutallab had "no passport"; thus, he must have had assitance from the omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent Mossad.

This claim is nonsense, and is debunked by the following information provided by saharareporters.com. The photo of Farouk Umar AbdulMutallab passport is included in the article. Have a look for yourself:

Source: saharareporters.com: Farouk Umar AbdulMutallab's passport surfaces: "He was in Lagos for his father's retirement," source confirms.

Additionally, the claim that a "well dressed Indian man" purchased AbdulMutallab's ticket to Detroit is an erroneous account of the events that took place prior to the failed bombing attempt. From the same article we read:

"...Upon arrival in Lagos, he changed that ticket and boarded a flight to Detroit via Amsterdam. Although Nigerian authorities claimed he 'sneaked into Nigeria' on Christmas Eve to board the KLM flight to Amsterdam, Saharareporter sources said Farouk had been around Lagos before and after he went to Ghana, for some reason, to purchase the ticket that he later changed in Lagos. It would appear that Nigerian security officials are covering up privileged people that may have provided material support to Umar as he prepared to depart for the US, although it is conceivable they may have helped him without knowing his mission."

So now we know that he "...he changed that ticket and boarded a flight to Detroit via Amsterdam."

When will the "9/11 truth movement" learn that questions and speculation are not evidence?

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:18, Anonymous sock puppet all in your face said...

the fact of the matter is that in every case where a terror plot was actually thwarted, every single one, it was stopped by ordinary people who said "fuck it, i've had enough!" flight 93, richard reed, the panty bomber, all of them.
i don't think that anyone one in the military did a good job that day, but richard myers does, and his bosses said "great job richard you get a raise and promotion!"

news flash big smart guys, just because you say something is "debunked" doesn't make it not true. i mean you giants of mental prowess couldn't even debunk richard myers promotion.

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

guitar bill, or should i say bull, uh did you read the sentence immediately following the emboldened words? could you please clarify who is the nigerian government is covering up for and why?

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:23, Blogger angrysoba said...

i mean you giants of mental prowess couldn't even debunk richard myers promotion.

Debunk MacArthur's promotion!

And edit out your vandalism of Wikipedia, will you!

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The sock puppet scribbles, "...i mean you giants of mental prowess couldn't even debunk richard myers promotion."

Tell us, Einstein, how does one "debunk richard myers promotion"?

That said, I'd be willing to bet a month's pay that you couldn't pass a formal examination in elementary logic.

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...guitar bill, or should i say bull, uh did you read the sentence immediately following the emboldened words? could you please clarify who is the nigerian government is covering up for and why?"

Yes, I read the article, you idiot.

Obviously you didn't read the article. Had you done so, you'd answer your own question.

Are you honestly trying to tell us that the Nigerian government is conspiring with the Mossad? Are you really that brain dead?

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:40, Anonymous sock puppet all in your face said...

GuitarBill said...
The sock puppet scribbles, "...i mean you giants of mental prowess couldn't even debunk richard myers promotion."

Tell us, Einstein, how does one "debunk richard myers promotion"?

That said, I'd be willing to bet a month's pay that you couldn't pass a formal examination in elementary logic.

your wager has enticed me!!

how may i prove my competency in elementary logic?

how much is the wager for? a months salary you say? gross or net?

or is this more billshit, err bull i mean:)

 
At 28 February, 2010 10:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, sock puppet, when your back's against the wall, CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

Why don't you answer my question: How does one "debunk richard myers promotion"?

Oh, I forgot, "9/11 truth" explodes on contact with logic.

My bad.

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill said...
Anonymous scribbles, "...guitar bill, or should i say bull, uh did you read the sentence immediately following the emboldened words? could you please clarify who is the nigerian government is covering up for and why?"

Yes, I read the article, you idiot.

Obviously you didn't read the article. Had you done so, you'd answer your own question.

Are you honestly trying to tell us that the Nigerian government is conspiring with the Mossad? Are you really that brain dead?

come on debunk this shit just like you debunked that no one was promoted after the coincidental fuck ups on 9/11.

put the bong down you yerk toke'n reefer queef, read the following and get back to me shit bird! we'll take it from there, ok?;)

the transcript from the congressional hearings on jan 27th 2010 on the panty bomber:


REP. THOMPSON: Okay. So — all right. So he has a visa. So what does that do? In the process, does it revoke the visa? Does it —

MR. KENNEDY: We — as I mentioned in my statement, Mr. Chairman, if we unilaterally revoked a visa — and there was a case recently up — we have a request from a law enforcement agency to not revoke the visa. We came across information; we said this is a dangerous person. We were ready to revoke the visa. We then went to the community and said, should we revoke this visa? And one of the members — and we’d be glad to give you that out of — in private — said, please do not revoke this visa. We have eyes on this person. We are following this person who has the visa for the purpose of trying roll up an entire network, not just stop one person. So we will revoke the visa of any individual who is a threat to the United States, but we do take one preliminary step. We ask our law enforcement and intelligence community partners, do you have eyes on this person, and so you want us to let this person proceed under your surveillance so that you may potentially break a larger plot?

REP. THOMPSON: Well, I think that the point that I’m trying to get at is, is this just another box you’re checking, or is that some security value to add in that box, to the list?

MR. KENNEDY: The intelligence and law enforcement community tell us that they believe in certain cases that there’s a higher value of them following this person so they can find his or her co-conspirators and roll up an entire plot against the United States, rather than simply knock out one soldier in that effort.

http://detnews.com/article/20100128/NATION/1280403/Terror-suspect-s-visa-kept-valid-for-larger-probe--hearing-told


“The general outlines of the Northwest bombing attempt and the 9/11 attacks are startlingly similar. One might even say that what is involved is a modus operandi. In both cases, those alleged to have carried out the actions had been the subject of US intelligence investigations and surveillance and had been allowed to enter the country and board flights under conditions that would normally have set off multiple security alarms.
“Both then and now, the government and the media expect the public to accept that all that was involved was mistakes. But why should anyone assume that the failure to act on the extensive intelligence leading to Abdulmutallab involved merely ‘innocent’ mistakes—and not something far more sinister?”

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/feb2010/f253-f03.shtml

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:25, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The World Socialist Website is your source?

The WSWS is not a source of investigative journalism; on the contrary, the WSWS is composed primarily of op-ed columns written by members of the Socialist International. In addition to op-ed columns, the WSWS is infamous for half-baked, anti-American conspiracy theories.

Citing a source of conspiracy theories is not evidence; it's a circle jerk.

Are you honestly suggestion that the US government is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and therefore incapable of making errors?

In which parallel universe do you reside?

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:31, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

Pick a name you fucking asshole loser. It's not that damn hard fucktard!

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The fourth paragraph should read,

"...Are you honestly suggesting that the US government is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and therefore incapable of making errors?"

Sorry. My bad.

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:43, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill said...
That's right, sock puppet, when your back's against the wall, CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

Why don't you answer my question: How does one "debunk richard myers promotion"?

Oh, I forgot, "9/11 truth" explodes on contact with logic.

My bad.
learn how to read you fucking apetard fuck twit.

sackcloth and ashes said...
'it was three days before richard myers, the military officer in charge of NORAD was promoted.'

Another lie to be addressed. General Myers was CINC NORAD from August 1998-February 2000. But then what are facts to a truther?



did you read the wiki on richard myers, did you read this thread at all? this was my reply to sc:

He was the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) during the September 11th, 2001, terror attacks because CJCS Shelton was en route to Europe. However, at the time the Pentagon was attacked, he was on Capitol Hill and not in the Pentagon. It should be noted that he did leave Capitol Hill and spent the remainder of the day in the Pentagon. His office was not damaged during the attack. While in charge of American Air Defenses on September 11, 2001; Myers was not court-marshaled and shot for dereliction of duty, rather he remarkably was promoted to the highest position in the military; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

look it up geniuses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Myers#Commander_and_Chairman


and then some how you wandered in

GuitarBill said...
"der debunkerder promotionder duh howsa you debunka great generals promotionder"?.?!?

and the best answer the to the question that was asked

"why was richard myers promoted?"

is that it was his turn. seriously thats the best you guys came up with so far.

that and some bullshit about generals in world war 2. like 9/11 is ancient history and happened hundreds of years ago and the people who did it can't held responsible because 9/11 happened so long ago or because the military is too incompetent to catch osama.

iq levels through through the roof up in this mother fucker.

so i guess you were talking out your ass about the wager? i'm wondering how much of the other shit you talk comes out your ass too....
seriously, scholars and fucking geniuses the lot of you, true intellectuals

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:49, Anonymous Lucifer said...

GuitarBill, your mother is still here with us. It took her some practice, but she has now mastered the art of quacking like a duck with three demon dicks in her mouth. We have the little diseased cunt crawling around naked on a leash. She keeps violently pissing herself. Imagine that!

Now and then, from between her swollen, herpes infested lips, a faint 'help me' can be discerned. But that we know only after her squealings have been translated by the swine department.

Mirabile dictu, don't you think?

 
At 28 February, 2010 11:52, Anonymous Anonymous said...

GuitarBill said...
The fourth paragraph should read,

"...Are you honestly suggesting that the US government is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and therefore incapable of making errors?"

Sorry. My bad.



it was in the detroit news bill, look it up, you got a lot of "bads" happening, whats up fool? seems like you got lots to be sorry about.....

you can read the article from the detroit news below, i just thought the socialist page was a good read. you can read, right?

anyways when does this debunking i hear so much about start?


http://detnews.com/article/20100128/NATION/1280403/Terror-suspect-s-visa-kept-valid-for-larger-probe--hearing-told

 
At 28 February, 2010 12:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...why was richard myers promoted?"

Frankly, I haven't the slightest idea why he was promoted, and even if I did, that knowledge wouldn't prove or disprove anything.

The fact is that I've already demonstrated for you that the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, took a full 81 minutes to intercept Payne Stewart's Learjet. The Learjet's transponder aided the interception of the wayward aircraft.

In addition,

[1] Flight A11 was hijacked at 8:13 EDT and crashed at 8:46 EDT, which is a duration of 33 minutes.

[2] Flight UA175 was hijacked at 8:47 EDT and crashed at 9:03 EDT, which is a duration of 16 minutes.

[3] Flight AA77 was hijacked at 8:56 EDT and crashed at 9:37 EDT, which is a duration of 41 minutes.

[4] Flight UA 93 was hijacked at 9:28 EDT and crashed at 10:03 EDT, which is a duration of 35 minutes.

Moreover, the transponders were disabled.

Now, given the aforementioned time-line, how can you argue that anyone "failed"? How does the time-line support your "stand down" theory?

Again, your argument assumes that the US government is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent.

 
At 28 February, 2010 12:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...anyways when does this debunking i hear so much about start?"

You've already been debunked, Einstein, you're just too stupid and dishonest to admit it.

 
At 28 February, 2010 12:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous lies, "...it was in the detroit news bill, look it up, you got a lot of 'bads' happening, whats up fool? seems like you got lots to be sorry about....."

This is another common "truther" tactic: Misrepresent your source.

The article you reference, titled Terror suspect's visa kept valid for larger probe, hearing told, does not support the conspiraloon ideas promoted by the so called "9/11 truth movement". On the contrary, the article argues that "...Washington politicians have focused criticism on two key areas: the intelligence community breakdown that led to Abdulmutallab being able to board the plane, and the handling of the suspected terrorist after his apprehension."

The fact is that your entire argument is based on conspiraloon fantasies written by WSWS.

 
At 28 February, 2010 12:47, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'as far as richard myers goes: He was the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) during the September 11th, 2001, terror attacks because CJCS Shelton was en route to Europe.'

OK, but you said he was CINC NORAD at the time.

'However, at the time the Pentagon was attacked, he was on Capitol Hill and not in the Pentagon. It should be noted that he did leave Capitol Hill and spent the remainder of the day in the Pentagon.'

Relevance?

'His office was not damaged during the attack.'

And your point is what precisely?

'While in charge of American Air Defenses on September 11, 2001; Myers was not court-marshaled and shot for dereliction of duty,'

It's spelt 'court-martial', mong. And why exactly should he have been shot for 'dereliction of duty'?

Here's another fun fact for you. The defence budget is approved by Congress. From the end of the Cold War to the aftermath of 9/11 the US Defence budget shrunk because of the peace dividend. NORAD's budget and force structure was a particular victim because - hey, guess what? The USSR doesn't exist anymore, so why do we need an extensive continental air defence system.

You cnuts in the 'truth' movement have goldfish bowl memories, and think that life is like a Tom Clancy novel. The fact that most of you couldn't even run a bath - let alone actually hold any significant position of responsibility - makes your rantings about what military personel should have done on 9/11 even more laughable. FOAD, you O2 thief.

 
At 28 February, 2010 13:59, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"court-marshaled"

Do you mean he was pushed around a courtroom by a baliff?


HAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

 
At 28 February, 2010 14:19, Blogger NoIdentity said...

You're supposed to put other people's block quotes in bold.
But as far as the Russian Jets go, they would have to cross the perimeter of North American airspace where there are much higher concentrations of radar sites. The hijacked flights were already over the interior of the continent when their transponders went off. Also a Mig has a unique radar signature that could presumably be distinguished from the 4,000 commercial jets in our skies at any given time.
It's pretty funny when truthers pretend that they're military experts. Remember when petgoat tried to argue that we let Bin Laden escape on purpose in Afghanistan? I miss him. At least he didn't inflict so much violence upon the English language as this new guy.
And please! As if incompetent people being promoted is evidence of anything other than politics as usual!

 
At 28 February, 2010 15:13, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

As if the evidence that the nutty Sackdiapers is a drunken Pollyanna wasn't already piled up to the ceiling,he steps forward with the ludicrous assertion that the US military was crippled by budget cuts and had no protocol for dealing with planes going off course! Tiger,you need your head examined.The give away with you is that you acknowledge nothing and stay attached to ridiculous fantasies like a pit bull.The fact that you would even attempt to deny the historical fact that the Air Force intercepts domestic flights as part of their mission is proof of this.Col.Bowman crushes you into bits with his testimony, experience and knowledge of the Air Force and NORAD.Robin Hordon puts the lie to your nutty idea that the military just said "ah fuck it,there probably won't be any more hijackings inside the US ever again" and operated without a protocol regarding emergencies in the air. Particularly revealing is your drunken riff that "truthers" don't hold positions of responsibility.I guess it felt fun to say it,hey DogBoy? As a matter of fact,9/11 activism and literature is crowded with high ranking government officials and highly educated professionals illustrating that there's something rotten in Denmark. Of course,they are all lunatics,right?! My man,stay away from your brown friend at least once this week.Well,try to anyway.

 
At 28 February, 2010 15:33, Blogger angrysoba said...

As a matter of fact,9/11 activism and literature is crowded with high ranking government officials and highly educated professionals illustrating that there's something rotten in Denmark.

Niels Harrit's research?

 
At 28 February, 2010 15:43, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Hi Angrystupe,did you hear about Dr.Wilson? Great doctor,if you can't afford the operation he'll touch up the X-rays.Kla-boom!!

 
At 28 February, 2010 15:56, Anonymous Chet Ripley said...

Hey Walt - are you a pussy or just lazy?

Haven't you even attempted to topple the evil government yet? WFT???

"As a matter of fact,9/11 activism and literature is crowded with high ranking government officials and highly educated professionals"

LMMFAO!!! Thanks for the laugh poser.

 
At 28 February, 2010 16:03, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

When you hit the pipe you stumble into your sock drawer and all hell breaks loose.Captain Queeg,you've been outed,you pathetic drag queen.

 
At 28 February, 2010 16:39, Blogger angrysoba said...

Captain Queeg

I think, "Captain Queeg" better describes the array of nuts the Truth movement parade around with. David Ray Griffin is still looking for that key he knows the government made to steal the strawberries.

You Truthers can't just tell old grandpa he's lost his marbles and find him a home but insist on humouring him and indulging his senility.

You evil fuckers!

 
At 28 February, 2010 16:59, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
When you hit the pipe you stumble into your sock drawer and all hell breaks loose.Captain Queeg,you've been outed,you pathetic drag queen."

Can someone translate that into Sane for me?

Thanks.

 
At 28 February, 2010 17:04, Anonymous Steve Maryk said...

How fucked up does ones mind need to be to actually write something like this???

"When you hit the pipe you stumble into your sock drawer and all hell breaks loose.Captain Queeg,you've been outed,you pathetic drag queen."

Are all troofers so sexually repressed that it results in stuff like that?

Back in my Navy days I heard a carrier flight deck was the most dangerous place on earth. Being a sane woman at a troofer's gathering has got to be a close second.

 
At 28 February, 2010 17:11, Blogger NoIdentity said...

As a matter of fact,9/11 activism and literature is crowded with high ranking government officials and highly educated professionals

There are more high ranking government officials involved with The Disclosure Project than with the twoof movement. Keep fantasizing about a turning tide!

 
At 28 February, 2010 18:21, Anonymous New Yorker said...

"court-marshaled"

Just another indication of the level of education among the "truth" movement.

 
At 28 February, 2010 20:26, Anonymous Marc said...

Lemme get this straight...

Meyers should have court-martialed and shot because of 9/11? On what grounds? We don't shoot people who get court-martialed, but when we used to it was for things like treason or desertion during wartime.

NORAD (or the rest of the military for that matter) had never trained for this kind of attack. The sad truth is that the Pentagon does not improvise well at all. That is why they have all kinds of attack plans on the shelf for a variety of scenarios in almost every country on earth. Desert Storm was a 12 year-old battle plan, that we updated and implemented.

NORAD was great at intercepting Soviet BEAR bombers from the 1950s to 1993 when the Cold War fizzed out. The defense draw-down saw NORAD relax from it's hair-trigger days to passive dog-and-pony show. NORAD's main duty became monitoring Russian and Chinese missile tests.

On 9/11/2001, NORAD was running a drill. On 9/11/1981, that drill would have involved dozens of fighter aircraft, tankers, and other resources. Yet in 2001, the USAF just didn't have the money, so that drill was all largely a computer-based wargame.

For NORAD to track an individual aircraft, it needs to begin to track that aircraft from take-off, or the target aircraft needs to be designated by secondary radar/tracking sources. The NORAD radars and computers do not "Talk" to civilian radars and computers. NORAD only talks to NORAD. The reason that NORAD can track that glove that foated out of the Gemini space craft back in the 1960s is because some alert radar-tech who was tracking the capsule marked and labled that blip. If NORAD's computer crashed, all that data would be lost, and while they could still see the blips on their radar screens they would not know which blips were what.

Scapegoating is for retards. Throwing General Meyers in prison for 9/11 would make as much sense as court-martialing the SecNav for the U.S.S. Cole bombing. The Troofers think of themselves as true beacons of liberty yet they can't wait to line people up against a wall and shoot them. Well, everyone except for the Al Qaeda leadership responsible for the attacks.

The FBI's former head of counter-terrorism died at the WTC on 9/11, shouldn't that be enough?

 
At 28 February, 2010 20:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

sc: OK, but you said he was CINC NORAD at the time.

sorry, um, you guys don't read too good around here do ya? what i posted was:
1. Can anyone name one single person fired or reprimanded within the U.S. government (FBI, CIA, NORAD, FAA, NSA, or Bush Administration) for the 9/11 attacks.

AND

how many days was it before someone responsible for the tragic events of 9/11 was promoted?

three, it was three days before richard myers, the military officer in charge of NORAD was promoted.

your response:
Another lie to be addressed. General Myers was CINC NORAD from August 1998-February 2000. But then what are facts to a truther?

You still haven't told us if the Canadians were 'in' on the 'inside job' or not. In fact, you've dodged just about all the points I made. Why am I not surprised?

this was followed by my response with the facts you FAILED to debunk, that richard myers was in charge that day and that he was promoted 3 days later for stopping the terrorists so effectively.
here ya go one more time: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Myers

guitar bill, thanks for admitting you don't know shit, but you really need to learn to read before making wagers and backing out like the cunt you are.

guitar bull, err bill, thanks for admitting you don't know shit.

 
At 28 February, 2010 20:45, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

"sorry, um, you guys don't read too good around here do ya?"

We read far better than you write...

Now um, pick a name fucktard!

 
At 28 February, 2010 21:45, Anonymous paul w said...

"how many days was it before someone responsible for the tragic events of 9/11 was promoted?"

Al Quada was responsible for 9-11.

Ask them.

 
At 01 March, 2010 03:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

paul w said...
"how many days was it before someone responsible for the tragic events of 9/11 was promoted?"

Al Quada was responsible for 9-11.

Ask them.

that’s what i'm talking about, nobody other than osama and his 40 thieves were responsible for 9/11, no one was responsible to defend america, right?
it's not like america was defended by a multi-trillion dollar military force on 9/11, right?
it's not like the military wasn't running at least a dozen hijacking simulations and training scenarios that "helped" the military respond and stop the terrorists, right?

the trouble with the half wit fuck twits who lurk around this site and fail to debunk anything other than the idea that they're capable of coherent thought is that,
for any "debunking" around here to make sense you have to believe that the military is less competent then they way it's portrayed in hots shots part duex.

can't read, can't debunk, what can you fucktards do? oh yea, you can ban peeps that tell funny ass your mama jokes....

 
At 01 March, 2010 06:25, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

"that’s what i'm talking about, nobody other than osama and his 40 thieves were responsible for 9/11, no one was responsible to defend america, right?"

Wrong Blog Asshole - you need to go find a "bitch about the government/hate the US" website

Still having trouble picking a name?

How about "Clueless Asshole"?

Pick a name FUCKTARD!

 
At 01 March, 2010 07:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fucktard Patrol said...
"that’s what i'm talking about, nobody other than osama and his 40 thieves were responsible for 9/11, no one was responsible to defend america, right?"

Wrong Blog Asshole - you need to go find a "bitch about the government/hate the US" website

Still having trouble picking a name?

How about "Clueless Asshole"?

Pick a name FUCKTARD!

fuck a name and fuck you, how about i pick a name when you actually debunk something? hows that?

 
At 01 March, 2010 07:29, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"fuck a name and fuck you, how about i pick a name when you actually debunk something? hows that"

How about this?

I'll give you a lolipop if you actually prove something.

 
At 01 March, 2010 07:39, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lazarus Long said...
"fuck a name and fuck you, how about i pick a name when you actually debunk something? hows that"

How about this?

I'll give you a lolipop if you actually prove something.

in spite of the monumental, and coincidental fuck ups on 9/11 no one was fired, demoted or otherwise reprimanded for stopping zero of the four attacks that day.

can you name one person, just one who was held responsible for dereliction of duty for 9/11?

3 days later richard myers was promoted and given a fat raise.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Myers

it's been proven, undebunkable.
now wheres my lollipop shit bird?
or is this going to be on the same level of guitar bull and his imaginary wagers?

 
At 01 March, 2010 07:42, Anonymous New Yorker said...

that’s what i'm talking about, nobody other than osama and his 40 thieves were responsible for 9/11, no one was responsible to defend america, right?

No, there was a system in place to defend this country's airspace....from Russian strategic bombers armed with cruise missiles. Now I know the typical "truther" has no respect for the abilities of "towel-heads in caves", but the brilliance of the 9/11 attack is it exploited a total weakness in the defense systems.

Just because the panzers went around the Maginot Line in 1940 doesn't mean that the French were in on the blitzkrieg of their own country.

the trouble with the half wit fuck twits who lurk around this site and fail to debunk anything other than the idea that they're capable of coherent thought is that,
for any "debunking" around here to make sense you have to believe that the military is less competent then they way it's portrayed in hots shots part duex.


More incoherent babbling from an ignorant nobody who thinks he's a genius. What's the deal with the "truthers" all thinking they're a lot smarter and more relevant than they actually are?

 
At 01 March, 2010 07:44, Anonymous New Yorker said...

can you name one person, just one who was held responsible for dereliction of duty for 9/11?

3 days later richard myers was promoted and given a fat raise.


I see now. You've mistaken this blog, which deals with 9/11 "truth" conspiracy theories for one that rails against government waste and incompetence. Well, maybe you should start that blog yourself.

 
At 01 March, 2010 07:46, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

Desert Storm was a 12 year-old battle plan, that we updated and implemented.

"we"? "WE"? Did YOU help to "update" and "implement" war plans? Hmm?

How many of you fuckballoons aren't in the Pentagon while writing this shit, huh?

 
At 01 March, 2010 08:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Yorker said...


I see now. You've mistaken this blog, which deals with 9/11 "truth" conspiracy theories for one that rails against government waste and incompetence. Well, maybe you should start that blog yourself.

then debunk the truth, that no one was fired, debunk the truth that richard myers was promoted.

whats the problem, can we not debunk this?

no wonder you sphincter squirts get no hits, you don't actually debunk anything.

not sure what you think debunking is, but it's not thinking of clever insults and avoiding the questions.

 
At 01 March, 2010 08:25, Anonymous New Yorker said...

then debunk the truth, that no one was fired, debunk the truth that richard myers was promoted.

What's there to debunk? Nobody was fired and Richard Myers was promoted. What point are you trying to make?

whats the problem, can we not debunk this?

What is there to debunk? Mt. St. Helens erupted on May 18, 1980. Debunk that. Evan Longoria won the 2008 AL Rookie of the Year. Debunk that.

What point are you trying to make?

no wonder you sphincter squirts get no hits, you don't actually debunk anything.

I don't write for this blog. If you'd check the archives, you'd see that James and Pat covered all the nonsense that gets recycled by the "truth" movement years ago. There's not much left to do but laugh at the loons.

not sure what you think debunking is, but it's not thinking of clever insults and avoiding the questions.

What questions? You've states two banal facts and asked people to debunk them for no apparent reason.

Thomas Jefferson was born in 1743. Debunk that. The capital of Austria is Vienna. Debunk that. Mt. Mitchell in North Carolina is the highest mountain in the eastern US. Debunk that.

 
At 01 March, 2010 08:31, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

I'd love to watch Steve the Mook and the wacky NY,er cruising bars and hitting on women.Turns out the Debunker Cult is an unstoppable gallery of lady killers! Who knew?

 
At 01 March, 2010 08:51, Anonymous Roman Craig said...

Fuck off pussy boy poser...

 
At 01 March, 2010 08:51, Blogger angrysoba said...

Turns out the Debunker Cult is an unstoppable gallery of lady killers! Who knew?

Yo mama!

 
At 01 March, 2010 09:15, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

I don't think you moved to Japan because of your good looks, AngrySoba.

I think you were just gambling on jungle fever to save you from your wank marathons.

 
At 01 March, 2010 09:19, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"can you name one person, just one who was held responsible for dereliction of duty for 9/11?"

Well, according to you fucktard twoooofers™, George W. Bush.


Now, can you prove any part of the 9/11 conspiratoid bullshit?

 
At 01 March, 2010 09:39, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"then debunk the truth, that no one was fired, debunk the truth that richard myers was promoted."

Debunk the truth that nobody gives a flying fuck.

 
At 01 March, 2010 09:49, Blogger angrysoba said...

I don't think you moved to Japan because of your good looks, AngrySoba.


Got a problem with my good looks?

What don't you like about them?

 
At 01 March, 2010 09:50, Blogger angrysoba said...

I don't think you moved to Japan because of your good looks, AngrySoba.

I think you were just gambling on jungle fever to save you from your wank marathons.


In fact, NONE of this makes any sense at all!

 
At 01 March, 2010 11:00, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Part of the problem with debunking is that 'truthers' will come out with a stream of unrelated factoids and made-up shit, and expect us to figure out what goes on in their fucked-up minds.

So here's the challenge for 'sockpuppet all in your face' - you tell us what you think happened on 9/11, why it carries more weight than the 'official story', and base your arguments on something we call 'evidence'.

Crack on. I've given up asking Arseholie (AKA 'A Real Veteran' and countless other unconvincing personas) to do this, so I'll give you a chance to prove that 9/11 was an 'inside job', rather than an Al Qaeda attack.

 
At 01 March, 2010 11:12, Blogger angrysoba said...

Sackcloth and Ashes, you were in the army I believe.

Did the mess hall serve "explosive chips"?

I only ask because over at Craig Murray's is some guy who certainly believes he was once in the navy (and he may well have been) but has become a complete conspiraloon.

Hint: his name's Mark Golding.

 
At 01 March, 2010 12:51, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

In fact, NONE of this makes any sense at all!

You responded to it twice. This is just like hitting in aircraft carrier in battleships!

(Your comments, on the other hand, are like one continuous splash =)

 
At 01 March, 2010 12:58, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Captain Queeg sure is a tough guy,ain't he? It seems he and the addled linking machine Sack and Tonic are drinking from the same jar of moonshine.Look out for these guys and keep sharp objects away from them.Tell your matey,Angrysubpar,that at the Ground Zero Diner they're serving pancakes with exploding chips,it's all the rage!!

 
At 01 March, 2010 14:58, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
Captain Queeg sure is a tough guy,ain't he? It seems he and the addled linking machine Sack and Tonic are drinking from the same jar of moonshine.Look out for these guys and keep sharp objects away from them.Tell your matey,Angrysubpar,that at the Ground Zero Diner they're serving pancakes with exploding chips,it's all the rage!!"

Aw, c'mon, say "Debunker Cult", it's worth a +3!

 
At 01 March, 2010 18:33, Anonymous Marc said...

Yes "WE" updated the plans.

The military represents and defends all Americans, thus the collective "We". If I were talking about what happened at the Kremlin then it would be the collective "They" because I am not Russian.

We [the United States] invaded Panama. We [The United States]invaded Iraq. We [the United States] landed men on the moon.

I...took an English class, so that I...don't look stupid when I...write.

Get it?

 
At 01 March, 2010 19:13, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

I...took an English class, so that I...don't look stupid when I...write.

Get it?


No....

Apparently, .....YOU.... should ask for a refund. =P

 
At 01 March, 2010 19:14, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

Debunker cult

 
At 01 March, 2010 21:44, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't believe so many people are wasting so much time posting so much nonsense.

 
At 02 March, 2010 07:05, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Glenn Maxey said..."


I said....

You're still not man enough to lick the sand from my sons combat boots, cocksucker.

 
At 02 March, 2010 07:48, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

How can I ever have freedom without your son dying for it? He should die. That way I can be free.

Die, son of Lazarus. Die for my freedom! You'll get a burial with the limbers and caissons!

Schweet!

 
At 02 March, 2010 08:02, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Tell your matey,Angrysubpar,that at the Ground Zero Diner they're serving pancakes with exploding chips,it's all the rage!!'

I know this is a common question to ask of Walt's rantings, but WTF is this supposed to mean?

'Sackcloth and Ashes, you were in the army I believe.'

British, not US.

'Did the mess hall serve "explosive chips"?'

No, but the curries could have some unforeseen side-effects.

Oh, BTW Glenn Maxey, I understand you used to post here as .Roid Rage'. I just want to remind you that you were the author of this comment below, on this very thread:

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27396589&postID=3692567070416680804

'Oh and by the way, the ADL are just a bunch of zionist kikes who should be gassed.

25 February, 2010 09:47'

I believe you were in the process of denying that your 'movement' was full of neo-Nazis.

 
At 02 March, 2010 09:13, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

I believe you were in the process of denying that your 'movement' was full of neo-Nazis.

I never did any such thing, you kike. We are all neo-Nazis and we come here on this blog this visit our neo-Nazi brothers.

Hi Pat! Hi James! Why won't you wave back? Are you embarrassed? Torture is A-OKAY, remember! WMD-debacle? Just an innocent mistake!

High five for the Arian Brotherhood! Burn that cross!

 
At 02 March, 2010 11:47, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Time out for a tip of the hat to SackofMarbles' line about the curry in the British Army.That's witty.Finally!!

 
At 02 March, 2010 15:58, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'I never did any such thing, you kike. We are all neo-Nazis and we come here on this blog this visit our neo-Nazi brothers.'

This is truly deranged, Glenn, even by truther standards. You make Arseholie look well-adjusted and normal, which is saying something.

The process of lobotomising the mentally ill is usually barbaric and utterly inhumane, but in your case it is necessary.

 
At 02 March, 2010 18:43, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"The process of lobotomising the mentally ill is usually barbaric and utterly inhumane, but in your case it is necessary."

AS an added bonus, he's already been castrated.

 
At 03 March, 2010 17:22, Anonymous Glenn Maxey said...

The process of lobotomising the mentally ill is usually barbaric and utterly inhumane, but in your case it is necessary.

Indeed! After the procedure, I'll finally be able to converse with you on your level! No more intellectual mismatch!

High five!

 
At 04 March, 2010 04:12, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Indeed! After the procedure, I'll finally be able to converse with you on your level! No more intellectual mismatch!'

Says the scumbag who called me a 'kike'.

'High five!'

No, low life. That's what you are, Glenn, and that's how you'll remain.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home