Tuesday, March 16, 2010

We Are Change Stalks Major NWO Operative



It's a tough job, but Luke and his buddies are up to it. One Truther details his qualifications to "spread the truth" to her:

I have been in love with Jennifer Love Hewitt since I was a teenager. I even once made a movie about her called "I Love Jennifer Love Hewitt" this is absolutely serious. Ever since I saw her on Party of Five I've wanted to marry her. I encountered her in a coffee shop once in Hollywood California and was unable to work up the courage to approach her. I have also been a 9/11 advocate for quite some time. I would like to offer myself up to spread the truth to her because my knowledge of her....

Labels: , ,

28 Comments:

At 16 March, 2010 11:03, Blogger amandarmerry said...

"Truth" is certianly better than any fiction...

Yeah, I'm sure you have a good shot at it, Luke.

 
At 16 March, 2010 11:10, Anonymous Sam said...

Anyone drop a line to her publicist?

 
At 16 March, 2010 13:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is just plain weird and creepy , even by troofer standards .

 
At 16 March, 2010 14:00, Anonymous New Yorker said...

That is just plain weird and creepy , even by troofer standards.

Seriously. I hope she's got a serious security contingent to protect her from lunatics like this.

 
At 16 March, 2010 14:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

These things never end well.

 
At 16 March, 2010 14:32, Blogger BG said...

Latest video from Pilots for Truth presents analysis behind saying:

1) WTC crash planes weren't going as fast as claimed ( > 400 knots )

or

(my contention)

2) planes weren't normal 767 commercial jets

 
At 16 March, 2010 14:32, Blogger Dan K. Stanley said...

OT: Another truther "press conference" scheduled in Austin Texas. Some of the speakers include Alex Jones, Bob Bowman, and some guy from Seguin TX who claims to be a member of AE911TRUTH named Ron Avery.

Link to San Antonio WAC meet-up here: http://www.meetup.com/WeAreChangeSanAntonio/calendar/12751980/?from=list&offset=0

Dont have the time to make it but its slated to be an all day event if anyone living in Austin wants to get footage of millions of infowarriors that are sure to be there, lol.

 
At 16 March, 2010 14:34, Blogger BG said...

Link to copied vid here:

http://blip.tv/file/3353975

 
At 16 March, 2010 15:00, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Heh Dan - down there in Austin did you ever run into the hottie blonde tight truther chick with that radio show? I'd almost go truther for her.

 
At 16 March, 2010 15:43, Blogger amandarmerry said...

Latest video from Pilots for Truth presents analysis behind saying:

1) WTC crash planes weren't going as fast as claimed ( > 400 knots )

or

(my contention)

2) planes weren't normal 767 commercial jets


#1 proves inside job.. how? They still crashed into a building...

#2 proves inside job... how? they still crashed into a building.. they still had the same victims' DNA aboard, they were still the same planes used by those airlines. Perhaps you're suggesting they labled them wrong? How does THAT prove an inside job?

 
At 16 March, 2010 15:43, Blogger James B. said...

I will offer to truth squad Megan Fox...

 
At 16 March, 2010 17:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good looking women have always been shit-magnets.

 
At 16 March, 2010 17:28, Blogger Triterope said...

Ever since I saw her on Party of Five I've wanted to marry her. I encountered her in a coffee shop once in Hollywood California

It's like the Borat movie come to life.

 
At 16 March, 2010 18:22, Blogger BG said...

Not proving anything here.

Just asking questions, establishing arguments for discussion.

Here's a slo' motion vid. of the "Not UA 175" with bomber projectile exit of WTC 2. (Also included is the low resolution video evidence of a "bird" which Webfairy called a "whatzit" which are in evidence around the WTC airspace.)

http://billgiltner.blip.tv/file/2219678/

Another view of the building piercing bomber.

2nd Link:
ltner.blip.tv/file/2197600/

 
At 16 March, 2010 19:07, Blogger Triterope said...

BG, this thread is about Jennifer Love Hewitt. I don't think anyone is interested in a change of subject.

 
At 16 March, 2010 19:33, Blogger BG said...

What kind of mind thinks discussing JLH is on topic?

 
At 16 March, 2010 19:59, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"BG said...
Latest video from Pilots for Truth presents analysis behind saying:

1) WTC crash planes weren't going as fast as claimed ( > 400 knots )

or

(my contention)

2) planes weren't normal 767 commercial jets"

See my web site where I prove that BG is a short-bus window licking retard.

 
At 16 March, 2010 20:05, Blogger Triterope said...

What kind of mind thinks discussing JLH is on topic?

A heterosexual one.

 
At 16 March, 2010 20:08, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"BG said...
Not proving anything here.

Just asking questions, establishing arguments for discussion."

Riiigggghhhhtttttt.

Just asking questions.

Right.

"Here's a slo' motion vid. of the "Not UA 175" with bomber projectile exit of WTC 2."

And that proves that 767 hit the WTC tower.

What's your point?


"(Also included is the low resolution video evidence of a "bird" which Webfairy called a "whatzit" which are in evidence around the WTC airspace.)"

I do believe that that is what's called a "bird".

"Another view of the building piercing bomber."

It wasn't a "bomber", it was a commercial jetliner hijacked by islamofascist thugs and flown into the tower. A "bomber" is a military aircraft, that was a 767.

So my assesment was right.

 
At 16 March, 2010 20:09, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Now back to the important stuff.

I'd do her.

 
At 16 March, 2010 22:49, Blogger Dan K. Stanley said...

Patrick from Cincinnati said...
"Heh Dan - down there in Austin did you ever run into the hottie blonde tight truther chick with that radio show? I'd almost go truther for her."

Srry, not familiar with her but I'm actually in San Antonio, so we can only catch a few stations from Austin. Seen a couple hottie truth chicks here but nothin will debonerfy like chicks spouting truth.......except maybe chicks dropping the "N-Bomb".

 
At 17 March, 2010 01:23, Anonymous John E. Smoke said...

I have also been a 9/11 advocate for quite some time.

So he's admitting to be an Islamist Terrorist or at least an Islamist Terrorist sympathiser? Fascinating.

Time to hire a few more body guards Miss Hewitt. These people are dangerous.

 
At 17 March, 2010 02:35, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'BG said...
Not proving anything here.'

'Not proving anything' is what truthers have been doing since 12th September 2001.

Back on topic, I hope Ms Love Hewitt has a good security detail, preferably armed.

 
At 17 March, 2010 03:20, Blogger truth hurts said...

Did anyone notice this WAC member?
Michael Night, from the Foundation of Law and Government.

:o)

 
At 17 March, 2010 03:50, Blogger Triterope said...

Back on topic, I hope Ms Love Hewitt has a good security detail, preferably armed.

I'm not worried. I'm sure that an actress with her, uh... aesthetic qualities has good security, and a lot of experience in dealing with crazy male fans.

 
At 17 March, 2010 05:35, Anonymous Fucktard Patrol said...

truth hurts said...
"Did anyone notice this WAC member?
Michael Night, from the Foundation of Law and Government."


Yes, he's the guy who got bannedfrom match.com and is using WAC as a dating service:


4 weeks agoMichael Knight posted a greeting for Missy
"Hi Missy welcome to NY 911 Truth Activist Group Unite! I am new to the group also, I am looking for a CHANGE also, I deserately want to be an agent of change, not only for me, but for everyone, I feel what is happening is wrong, and we all need to voice our opinion; there is several activities going on here in New York with the 911 Truth maybe we can do it together? This Saturday they are going to be at Ground Zero at the Path Station, would you like to come with me, I'd love to see you there!"

 
At 17 March, 2010 22:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ms Hewitt should look into getting a Tazer and some pepper spray.

I see that unemployed pilot RB is looking for attention again.

 
At 03 May, 2010 14:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"John E. Smoke said...

I have also been a 9/11 advocate for quite some time.

So he's admitting to be an Islamist Terrorist or at least an Islamist Terrorist sympathiser? Fascinating."

That is not a syllogism. A 9/11 advocate does not equal being a terrorist or terrorist sympathizer. Your logic sucks.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home