Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Sander Hicks Starts Truther Party

Well, these guys never pretended to be more than one-issue dolts, so it's hardly surprising.

We are talking about starting what will soon become a major political force: something optimistic, smart, and savvy.

We will win elections. We will change the world.


Yeah, that's what all third parties say. Few of them ever win more than a local council seat. But:

I’m not talking about starting a “third party” or anything marginal like that. I’m talking about starting something that has great appeal, great politics, smart marketing, empowering culture, and a winning strategy.


Yeah, he's not starting a third party; he's starting an eighth or ninth party.

Labels:

82 Comments:

At 26 May, 2010 10:23, Blogger Adam said...

Maybe this will help segregate the crazies from the mainstream political parties. The fewer denies that vote in GOP and Dem primaries, the better.

 
At 26 May, 2010 11:27, Anonymous Bikerman said...

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

I'll be SHOCKED if they get over .01% of the vote in any election they manage to get their name in. ... On second thought, I'll be SHOCKED if they even get their dumb "truth" party name in any election, even for a county supervisor/city council type local election.

Self-important narcissistic morons.

 
At 26 May, 2010 11:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Sander Hicks wrote, "...I’m not talking about starting a 'third party' or anything marginal like that. I’m talking about starting something that has great appeal, great politics, smart marketing, empowering culture, and a winning strategy."

As I recall, the primary goal of a marketing specialist is to convince consumers to purchase products and services that they don't need.

Thus, I'm certain that Sander Hicks' "something" will require all the "marketing" his cohorts can muster.

%^)

 
At 26 May, 2010 11:47, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

With your marketing expertise, you should work the Israeli ministry of defense, Sideshow Bill. ;-)

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:11, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Call the the Losertarians.

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:12, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"... you should work the Israeli ministry of defense"

Ah, the sweet sweet stench of anti-semitism from a twooooofer™.

Quelle surprise!

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous lies, "...With your marketing expertise, you should work the Israeli ministry of defense, Sideshow Bill. ;-)"

Really? No kidding?

I guess that explains why I exposed you as a bald-faced liar again (See post number 145). Right Pinocchio?.

Now, go lick your wounds, Pinocchio.

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:37, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Hey Bill, a more efficient way of linking to a comment is this way..... Just a tip! =)

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:38, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Ah, the sweet sweet stench of anti-semitism from a twooooofer™.

Quelle surprise!


Ha ha, a zionist neocon calling everybody an anti-semite! What a surprise!

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:54, Blogger hauptcouture2009 said...

Rethink "Terrorist Countries 2010" : Germany and Switzerland at the top with Kazachstan ;http://ff.im/kOG5Q

 
At 26 May, 2010 12:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

We will win elections. We will change the world.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

In other news, Sander Hicks described his first homosexual encounter to a group of retirees Wednesday.

 
At 26 May, 2010 13:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...Hey Bill, a more efficient way of linking to a comment is this way..... Just a tip! =)"

Yeah, and I caught you lying again, scumbag.

Do you kiss your mother with those lying lips, junior?

And remember, cretin, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 26 May, 2010 13:33, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Ha ha, wishful thinking, Bill.

 
At 26 May, 2010 13:39, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Ha ha, a zionist neocon calling everybody an anti-semite!"

Guess the truth hurts, huh, fucktard?

Anyway, thanks, dude, that's a nice compliment, coming as it does from a short bus riding, window licking retard.

 
At 26 May, 2010 13:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...With your marketing expertise, you should work the Israeli ministry of defense, Sideshow Bill. ;-)"

What does your comment have to do with Sander Hicks?

Trolling again, Anonymous?

Specifically, you're attempting to end the debate by starting an argument that's unrelated to the topic at hand.

And remember, scumbag, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 26 May, 2010 13:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ha ha, wishful thinking, Bill."

Trolling again, Anonymous?

 
At 26 May, 2010 14:11, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

"Trolling again, Anonymous?"

Uhm Pabaah?

You attack Sander Hicks, and I attack you..don't be such a gutless wimp.

 
At 26 May, 2010 14:13, Blogger b. j. edwards said...

I noticed the spelling error right away.

He meant to write:

"We are talking about starting what will soon become a major political farce:..."

 
At 26 May, 2010 14:26, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...You attack Sander Hicks, and I attack you..don't be such a gutless wimp."

And don't be such an underhanded troll, scumbag.

After all, you could have made your unrelated comment in the previous thread, troll.

Now, let's hear your threadbare excuses for trolling, scat-muncher?

And remember, cornhole, I'm just askin' questions...

 
At 26 May, 2010 14:51, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Nah. Sander Hicks is just a cool guy, and you are a closet snowballing killjoy. :-P

 
At 26 May, 2010 16:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Nah. Sander Hicks is just a cool guy, and you are a closet snowballing killjoy. :-P"

"...killjoy"?!?!?!?!? Not quite, mendacious one.

No, in fact, a more accurate statement would read, "...I'm fed up with your lying, deceit, manipulation and bad behavior in general, Anonymous."

Now, go away and sin no more, cretin.

 
At 26 May, 2010 16:20, Blogger Triterope said...

This is a textbook example of why American third parties never get anywhere.

American third parties are full of people like Sander Hicks: unskilled arrogant dorks who've declared themselves "community leaders" or "activists" or some such thing, and think they're the big fish in the small pond.

But even a small pond has a food chain. And when some of these people inevitably fail to achieve prominent positions in the third party, they splinter off and form their own third party. That way they can be in charge, and make sure that their issue and their ego will get the attention they deserve... until the process repeats again, and their new group splinters into more new groups.

And if there was ever a group destined to splinter, it would be a 9-11 Truth political party. These idiots can't get along or agree on anything when politics and egos aren't a factor. What will happen when they are?

I hope the Truth Party has a national convention someday. For those of us who follow and laugh at the 9-11 Truth Movement, that would be our Woodstock.

 
At 26 May, 2010 18:02, Blogger ConsDemo said...

This is a textbook example of why American third parties never get anywhere.

American third parties are full of people like Sander Hicks: unskilled arrogant dorks who've declared themselves "community leaders" or "activists" or some such thing, and think they're the big fish in the small pond.


There is certainly a fair amount of truth to that statement, but it is also true that the election rules are tilted in favor of the two major parties. Even if they weren't, however, the "TwoofNow" party, or whatever they'd call themselves would bomb.

 
At 26 May, 2010 18:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Lazarus Long wrote, "...Call them the Losertarians."

LOL! Good one, LL.

And their party slogan should be "We Are Deranged" (as opposed to "We Are Change").

%^)

 
At 26 May, 2010 18:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have a question:

Who the hell is Sander Hicks? His name is familiar, but for the life of me I can't remember if he's done anything noteworthy (read: excessively crazy) within the Truth movement, or if he's just a regular Truther who somehow got famous.

 
At 26 May, 2010 23:03, Anonymous paul w said...

"We are talking about starting what will soon become a major political force..."

Yup, it's going to happen soon...any day now...just you wait...oh boy, it's gonna be HUGE!...yeah, any minute now...wow, it's gonna be BIG!...any day now...just you wait..

So, another fail to add to the list of 'it's just around the corner' by the truthers:

1. new evidence of CD,
2. the masses rising
3. new evidence of inside knowledge
4. media anti-truth collapse
5. etc.

 
At 27 May, 2010 00:57, Anonymous KDLarsen said...

Apparently, the former BBC journalist Alan Hart has cracked the case of 9/11:

http://edwardrynearson.wordpress.com/2010/05/25/everything-you-know-about-israel-is-probably-wrong

I love how he's so specific, with his unnamed source from the unnamed civil engineer firm.

 
At 27 May, 2010 02:10, Anonymous stilicho said...

Isn't Sander Hicks that guy who's ripped off everyone he's been in business with? How about 'Bogus Party', 'Hoax Union', or 'Confederacy of Charlatans' as alternate names for his latest stupid idea?

 
At 27 May, 2010 03:22, Blogger Snapple said...

Sander Hicks is an associate of the convicted Dallas car bomber James Hatfield, and the convicted Denver child pornographer and pedophile Delmart Vreeland.

Sander Hicks also tortured and injured a child for fun.

He also wrote on the internet how he attacked someone he claimed was a NAZI and hit him on the head.

He wrote a play that ended with a Black Bloc anarchist (really Sander) about to hang a politician, really Bush.

But I know for a fact that he really gets his rocks off by standing on gradesschoolers, suffocating them, and injuring them.

Sander Hicks also criticizes torture at Abu Ghraib, but he doesn't admit that he is a child-torturer.

 
At 27 May, 2010 04:36, Blogger Triterope said...

it is also true that the election rules are tilted in favor of the two major parties.

Yes, it is. The two major parties also have tremendous advantages in campaign money and name recognition. So yeah, it's not a fair fight, and that makes it difficult for any third party to attract viable candidates. Which leaves them little reason to exist.

 
At 27 May, 2010 08:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Snapple, how about some reliable sources for your libelous drivel?

I mean, I heard it through the grapevine that your mother relentlessly sucks black dick for even the tiniest amount of crack cocaine. After all, since I said it, it's true. Ipse dixit, right? Douche bag.

 
At 27 May, 2010 09:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...Snapple, how about some reliable sources for your libelous drivel?"

That's rich. And especially so when one considers that you don't know the difference between speculation and fact.

Here's a new word for you, shit-for-brains: duplicity.

Oh, and I almost forgot: Go fuck yourself, flake.

 
At 27 May, 2010 10:28, Blogger avicenne said...

"I hope the Truth Party has a national convention someday. For those of us who follow and laugh at the 9-11 Truth Movement, that would be our Woodstock."

That would be the ne plus ultra of nuttery. The zenith, or the nadir, depending on how you look at it. God, please let it happen.

Imagine the reaction Grifter would get, or the box lover. The hilarity would be too great.

Join us! We will change the world!
We have people "with stature, like Daniel Sujata or Rosie O'Donnell." Ed Asner could make a special appearance, wheeled out by Charlie Sheen. There wouldn't be a dry eye in the house.

 
At 27 May, 2010 12:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who the hell is Sander Hicks?

I thought he was a conspiracy-minded comedian who died of cancer in the mid-90s. Maybe I'm thinking of someone else.

 
At 27 May, 2010 12:12, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

avicenne, nothings beats another forked tongued press conference by Shyam Sunder. I hate the circus but for a NIST press conference I'll gladly make an exception.

Once there, it's nothing but giggling mirth, tumbling from one pseudoscientific mirage into another mealy mouthed propaganda epic.

Hey you know what? Let's invite Cass Sunstein's Popular Mechanics disinformation gaggle. More side-slapping two-faced cover up propaganda. Meigs can be Hardy and Sunder can be Oliver. Gross will play the joker. While Wieck grows more wrinkles every year and Roberts grows every more bald and gray, and child abuser Troy Sexton slowly morphs into the knuckle dragging neanderthal his DNA commands him to be, the truth movement blows up like a blip, untouchable and by far surpassing the pseudoskeptic ghouls who are fighting nothing but the ghosts of their own pathological, conformist denialism.

Here's to 2011 and the information liberation that internet provided freedom loving citizens worldwide. Long live Wikileaks. Long live the 9/11 truth coalition. Torture, wiretapping, WMD lies, anthrax, war crimes, terrorist funding, election fraud, assassinations, mainstream media collusion with corporate and CIA interests... You driveling, sniveling, groveling government loyalist cyberbullying turds on a stick are going down bigtime.

Cheers!

 
At 27 May, 2010 12:14, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

"I thought he was a conspiracy-minded comedian who died of cancer in the mid-90s. Maybe I'm thinking of someone else."

Relax Anonymous. It's just a ride. Get off at the next stop anytime.

 
At 27 May, 2010 16:01, Blogger Triterope said...

You driveling, sniveling, groveling government loyalist cyberbullying turds on a stick are going down bigtime.

Yeah, we're going to die of old age while we're waiting for you to get your case together.

 
At 27 May, 2010 16:53, Blogger Snapple said...

Sander stood on two boys' chests with his feet and rocked back and forth.

One boy was badly injured for months. His sternum and clavicle were injured. He was in a lot of pain for months, was disabled, couldn't swim or play, and required expensive medical care.

Sander assaulted him on July 20, 1990. He would rock back and forth suffocating the boys and releasing the pressure.

I know about this first hand. The information about James Hatfield and Delmart Vreeland is public information.

The pedophile Delmart Vreeland went to prison for perhaps 400 years. He made two boys do bad things while he filmed. He was a pedophile and a pornographer. Sander used him as a source for his 9-11 conspiracy theory.

Sander bragged about his attack on the Nazi on the Internet.

His play about hanging a politician with a noose is also on the Internet.

Sander is a lot like those morons who tortured prisoners at Abu Ghraib. He enjoys hurting people.

 
At 27 May, 2010 18:40, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"You driveling, sniveling, groveling government loyalist cyberbullying turds on a stick are going down bigtime."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!

That's funny, a threat from a hollow-chested, Mountain Dew swilling, Cheeto colored fucktard living in Mom's basement.

You poor pathetic mook.

 
At 27 May, 2010 19:36, Anonymous paul w said...

"I hope the Truth Party has a national convention someday. For those of us who follow and laugh at the 9-11 Truth Movement, that would be our Woodstock."

Yup, let it happen, please, let it happen...

 
At 28 May, 2010 07:46, Blogger Triterope said...

I'm going to have to join the anonymous brigade on this one. These are serious accusations, and they demand better proof than "look it up on the internet."

He also wrote on the internet how he attacked someone he claimed was a NAZI and hit him on the head.

Well, I couldn't find it. Link, please?

He wrote a play that ended with a Black Bloc anarchist (really Sander) about to hang a politician, really Bush.

So what? Political allegory and Mary Sue internet fiction are not crimes.

The stuff about Hatfield and Vreeland is easy to verify (though it should be noted that Hatfield has been dead for nine years). So yeah, Sander Hicks has some scummy friends. But that alone doesn't make him a child molestor.

 
At 28 May, 2010 09:22, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

"Yeah, we're going to die of old age while we're waiting for you to get your case together."

Nah, you're gonna die checking your gasoline tank for gas with a match. I want to congratulate you in advance for winning the next Darwin award.

 
At 28 May, 2010 09:26, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Sourcing a child molester doesn't make you a child molester.

Sourcing Hitler (Or Lazarus Long) while researching Nazism doesn't make you a Nazi either.

Vreeland, child molesting filth that he is, knew about 9/11 in advance. He could be the fucking Sith Lord for all I fucking care.

The logic you guys employ stinks to high heaven. Just fucking prove he conned the notary.

 
At 28 May, 2010 10:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Vreeland, child molesting filth that he is, knew about 9/11 in advance. He could be the fucking Sith Lord for all I fucking care."

Yeah, Vreeland "knew about 9/11 in advance."

Kind of like William Cooper "knew about 9/11 in advance." Right?

Source: SLC: Now douche-bag, you know as well as I do that Bill Cooper didn't "predict" anything..

%^)

And you know as well as I do that Vreeland has no credibility. Zip Zilch. Nada.

So I guess that makes you an advocate for child pornographers.

Keep up the good work, cretin.

 
At 28 May, 2010 10:37, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 28 May, 2010 10:48, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Yeah, Vreeland "knew about 9/11 in advance."

Yes.

"Kind of like William Cooper "knew about 9/11 in advance." Right?"

Yes.

So I guess that makes you an advocate for child pornographers.

No. But in your fictitious world of facetious fabrication, anything and everything is possible Bill. Cut back on the LSD.

And you are an actual advocate for child abuse, through your proven, documented and continuous friendship here with Troy Sexton.

But how else can the debunker cult conduct a discussion but to resort to ad hominem instead of fact? I will pay you in kind, sure, but we both know you are incredibly sketchy and decrepit in the fact department Bill.

If ignorance is indeed bliss, Bill, then I envy you.

 
At 28 May, 2010 10:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous, "...Just fucking prove he conned the notary."

Now you're parroting that asshat, Mike Ruppert?

LOL!

The note Vreeland wrote in jail isn't a warning at all--you mook. Tell us, have you ever read Vreeland's alleged "warning", sans the compulsory troofer quote mining™?

That said, it was discovered that during the time Vreeland claimed to be in Moscow uncovering the 9/11 plot, that he was, in fact, jailed in St. Thomas, Ontario, Canada.

Vreeland's Navy records prove that he used false identification to enter the Navy and that he didn't finish basic training. Thus, it's unlikely that he was ONI. Additionally, Vreeland's high school records prove that he didn't finish high school.

The alleged "relentless drug dealer" who "pursued" Vreeland was actually Vreeland's brother in-law.

Moreover, Vreeland has an extensive criminal record. In fact, he has spent most of his adult life in prison. He was wanted in at least six states and Canada.

The truth is that a cursory investigation into Vreeland's claims will reveal that nothing Vreeland ever said on the record could possibly be true.

"...Mr. Vreeland has not produced a single additional piece of evidence that is independent of his own testimony that might allow his assertions and allegations to attain some 'air of reality' to them." -- Canadian Justice LaForme, 5 March 2002.

Finally, I recall reading a post wherein you claim that Vreeland is "missing". That claim is patently false. In fact, Vreeland was arrested in Hampton, Iowa on 20 October 2004. Today, he's serving a 336 year sentence for crimes that include child prostitution, child pornography and fraud. Thus, the idea that Vreeland was eliminated by the perpetrators of 9/11 is proven to be another pile of troofer crap.

Any more 100% fact-free "commentary" for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 10:54, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous bald-faced lies, "Yes...No. But in your fictitious world of facetious fabrication, anything and everything is possible Bill. Cut back on the LSD."

Really? No kidding?

What's this, jizzmop?

"...Supposedly, a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went into Osama bin Laden's hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, and he came out and told everybody within three week Osama bin Laden is gonna attack the United States and Israel..." -- William Cooper

Source: YouTube: Bill Cooper "predicts" 9-11.

From the horse's mouth, jerk.

Any more 100% fact-free commentary for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 11:17, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

From the horse's mouth, jerk.

Duh....! Why are you reading back to me the prediction I familiarized you with in the first place, Bill? Don't take credit for it. Just thank me. He made the prediction based on a source, and this is unsurprising. And I thank *you* for underscoring that Bill Cooper, like Vreeland, predicted 9/11 before it occurred. And I don't give a rat's ass how crazy or criminal they are, prediction is prediction, while the multi-fucking-trillion dollar intelligence apparatus supposedly was too "incompetent" to get it.

Only you could be so gullible Bill. Right up there with Israel's peaceful nuclear reactor.

Cheers, Bill =)

 
At 28 May, 2010 11:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Duh....! Why are you reading back to me the prediction I familiarized you with in the first place, Bill? Don't take credit for it. Just thank me. He made the prediction based on a source, and this is unsurprising."

Liar.

William Cooper didn't predict anything.

Clearly, Cooper's own account confirms that the CNN reporter predicted the attacks, not William Cooper.

"...Supposedly, a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went into Osama bin Laden's hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, and he came out and told everybody within three week Osama bin Laden is gonna attack the United States and Israel..." -- William Cooper

Source: YouTube: Bill Cooper "predicts" 9-11.

Thus, Cooper merely repeated a story he watched on CNN.

Any more 100% fact-free bullshit for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 11:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...And I thank *you* for underscoring that Bill Cooper, like Vreeland, predicted 9/11 before it occurred."

Vreeland didn't predict anything.

And perhaps you can explain why Justice LaForme had this to say about Vreeland?

"...Mr. Vreeland has not produced a single additional piece of evidence that is independent of his own testimony that might allow his assertions and allegations to attain some 'air of reality' to them." -- Canadian Justice LaForme, 5 March 2002.

So why should I believe Vreeland or you, liar?

After all, I'll take the word of the justice over the "word" of a compulsive liar every time.

 
At 28 May, 2010 11:50, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Thus, Cooper merely repeated a story he watched on CNN.

Yes, he cited a source. Next. ;o)

 
At 28 May, 2010 11:54, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

After all, I'll take the word of the justice over the "word" of a compulsive liar every time.

Ha ha ha ha the word of "justice" ha ha ha. You mean "just ice". Bush, Cheney and their gang of despotic thugs are still free men last I checked.

Color me impressed.

 
At 28 May, 2010 11:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous proves he's an idiot, and scribbles, "...Yes, he cited a source. Next. ;o)"

Try a formal course in elementary logic, jizzmop.

If I sit down to watch CNN and listen to a story that includes a prediction by the reporter, and then approach you and pass on the information I learned from CNN, did I make a prediction?

Of course, not. I merely passed on information that I obtained from a third party.

Any more 100% fact-free nonsense for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:04, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Of course, not. I merely passed on information that I obtained from a third party.

Nope, Cooper merely cited a source, and put it into context. It happens all the time.

Here's some "elementary logic" for you: Bin Laden was trumpeting a large scale terrorist attack to a CNN journalist while the entire United States military intelligence apparatus found themselves (A) unable to find him (B) unable to prevent 9/11.

All that despite a litany of warnings from multiple sources. They were playing deaf, Bill.

Incompetence... What a howler!

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous proves again that he's a few cookies short of a full jar, and scribbles, "...Ha ha ha ha the word of 'justice' ha ha ha. You mean 'just ice'. Bush, Cheney and their gang of despotic thugs are still free men last I checked."

Justice LaForme is a Canadian--you 'tard. Thus, he has no jurisdiction in the United States.

The fact remains, that in a court of law, Vreeland has no credibility. Thus, you're citing a convicted child pornographer as a "credible witness".

I think it's clear that your idea of "just us" is a Kangaroo Court.


The 911 "truth" Movement--If We're Ever Arrested, We Sure Hope the Prosecutor Doesn't Use Our Standard's of Evidence.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:09, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Justice LaForme is a Canadian--you 'tard. Thus, he has no jurisdiction in the United States.

I know that you doddering dullard. There is as much "justice" in Canada as there is in the States. That's the whole point, you cajoling clodknocker.

The 911 "truth" Movement--If We're Ever Arrested, We Sure Hope the Prosecutor Doesn't Use Our Standard's [sic] of Evidence.

Ha ha ha, there we go again. I invite you to unleash some of that "elementary logic" on this oft repeated and logically flawed sentence of yours. See it? Of course you don't. You're a blundering, botching bunghole of the first order.

So did you buy your degrees on E-bay?

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous bald-faced lies, "...Nope, Cooper merely cited a source, and put it into context. It happens all the time."

Wrong! Read it again, liar:

"...Supposedly, a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went into Osama bin Laden's hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, and he came out and told everybody within three week Osama bin Laden is gonna attack the United States and Israel..." -- William Cooper

Source: YouTube: Bill Cooper "predicts" 9-11.

Now, you can lie until you're blue in the face, Anonymous, but Cooper's own words prove that you're lying.

Moreover, Cooper didn't add anything to the report. The CNN reporter made the prediction of the attack, and Cooper merely relayed that information to his audience. Had added no value or "context" whatsoever.

Any more 100% fact-free nonsense, hair splitting and bald-faced lies for us, jizzmop.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:14, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Moreover, Cooper didn't add anything to the report. The CNN reporter made the prediction of the attack, and Cooper merely relayed that information to his audience. Had added no value or "context" whatsoever.

Another blatant falsehood, by the pimp of 9/11 lies.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...I know that you doddering dullard. There is as much "justice" in Canada as there is in the States. That's the whole point, you cajoling clodknocker."

According to whom? A compulsive liar, who can't make the distinction between speculation and fact?

The fact remains that Vreeland has no credibility, and Cooper didn't predict anything--your hair splitting and nonsense notwithstanding.

Any more 100% fact-free nonsense for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:16, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Let's take that one step further so you understand.

Bin Laden predicted the attacks, the CNN reporter merely repeated what he heard.

See how funny the games are you play ;-)

You're a clown. Throw another pie on your face, clown. You're a perfect sideshow =)

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:17, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

In fact, KSM predicted the attacks, Bin Laden merely repeated what he heard. ;-)

Wow, Bin Laden didn't predict 9/11.

Ha ha ha ha.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous scribbles, "...Another blatant falsehood, by the pimp of 9/11 lies."

Another 100% fact-free non-response from Anonymous the compulsive liar.

Keep up the good work, jizzmop. I'm impressed. NOT.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:20, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

The fact remains that Vreeland has no credibility, and Cooper didn't predict anything--your hair splitting and nonsense notwithstanding.

You don't have to have any "credibility" to have verifiably foreknowledge, you basehead.

Many people with 9/11 foreknowledge are in fact criminals you fucking dickhead.

Heh. Hopeless, hapless, spineless, gutless & clueless. The debunker cult in a nutshell!

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...Bin Laden predicted the attacks, the CNN reporter merely repeated what he heard."

No, bin Laden planned the attacks--you nincompoop.

The CNN reporter made the prediction and Cooper relayed that information to his audience--period.

Thus, Cooper didn't predict anything--your lies to contrary not withstanding.

Thus, you're a liar.

Any more 100% fact-free nonsense for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:23, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Sing a song Bill. Everybody sympathizes with the village idiot.

Besides, we need to experience the hideous to appreciate the beauty of real music. It balances the equation.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous lies, "...You don't have to have any "credibility" to have verifiably [SIC] foreknowledge, you basehead."

Vreeland didn't predict anything. In fact, the note that Vreeland wrote in jail could not have possibly been interpreted as a warning of anything.

Again, read the entire note, not just the parts you cherry pick, jizzmop.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:27, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

No, bin Laden planned the attacks--you nincompoop.

No, KSM allegedly planned the attacks, which is why he is called the "9/11 mastermind" by the OCT-ists. Stick to the story, you two-bit incompetent hack.

The CNN reporter made the prediction and Cooper relayed that information to his audience--period.

No, Cooper cited a source and put it into context. It happens all the time. Except in the crackpipe-induced fantasy world dreamt up by Bill, where up is down, left is right, and lack of 'credibility' causes criminals to become psychic.

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:31, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Have you figured out the fatal logical flaw in your prosecutor pun yet, dim bulb?

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:33, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Bill has gone out to lunch ;-)

Ta-tah now! ;-P

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous prevaricates, "...No, KSM allegedly planned the attacks, which is why he is called the "9/11 mastermind" by the OCT-ists. Stick to the story, you two-bit incompetent hack."

Really? No kidding?

Wrong again, jizzmop.

After initial denial, in 2004 Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

Source: The Washington Post: Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings?

Source: CBC: Bin Laden claims responsibility for 9/11.

Source: The Times of India: Osama claims responsibility for 9/11.

So, what was that you were saying, Pinocchio?

 
At 28 May, 2010 12:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous continues to lie in the face of evidence that proves he's full-of-shit, and scribbles, "...No, Cooper cited a source and put it into context. It happens all the time."

Right! That's why the direct quote I provide from Cooper contradicts your argument.

I guess a direct quote from Cooper has no credibility. Right jizzmop?

"...Supposedly, a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went into Osama bin Laden's hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, and he came out and told everybody within three week Osama bin Laden is gonna attack the United States and Israel..." -- William Cooper

Source: YouTube: Bill Cooper "predicts" 9-11.

Lie until you're blue in the face, Anonymous, but you'll NEVER be able to change Cooper's own words, which I included above. And those of us who are honest still know how to read--your efforts at hair splitting and subterfuge not withstanding.

Any more 100% fact-free nonsense for us, jizzmop?

 
At 28 May, 2010 15:01, Blogger Triterope said...

Vreeland, child molesting filth that he is, knew about 9/11 in advance. He could be the fucking Sith Lord for all I fucking care.

Yeah, it's funny how that works. It's funny that the only people who seem to figure out DURR TEH TRUTH ABOUT 9-11 DURRRRRRRRR are child molesters, or angry teenaged boys, or mental patients, or lifelong conspiracy hobbyists, or people with a book to sell, or aimless Internet trolls.

 
At 28 May, 2010 19:59, Anonymous Anonymous said...

After initial denial, in 2004 Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

HAHAHAHAHAH....you crack me Fretboard fool.

You talking about BlackBeard 2004 or is it GrayBeard 2001? or FatNose 2001 or SkinnyNose 1998? or LightComplexion or DarkComplexion or RightHanded or LeftHanded?

Which one Billbo Baggins you little Hobbit you....?

I mean The Washington God damn Post only Two Days ago reported:

"But that did not stop a CIA video being shot of a fake Osama bin Laden sitting around a camp fire... The video apparently used some of the CIA's "darker skinned" employees ...playing the terror chief's henchmen."
--- SPYTALK CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay
By Jeff Stein, The washington Post, May 25, 2010


I mean you sir are a really a comedian.

 
At 28 May, 2010 20:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anonymous whines, "...I mean you sir are a really a comedian."

And you, jizzmop, are a liar.

I gave you three sources from around the World--the United States, Canada and India--that CONFIRM bin Laden's confession.

Source: The Washington Post: Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings?

Source: CBC: Bin Laden claims responsibility for 9/11.

Source: The Times of India: Osama claims responsibility for 9/11.

And what do you offer in rebuttal?

An article from a blog that's based on--you guessed it--speculation, unsubstantiated assertions and opinion.

Par for the course.

Fuck you, jizzmop. I want FACTS, not speculation, unsubstantiated assertions and opinion. Got it, cretin?

Any more 100% fact-free nonsense for us, jizzmop?

 
At 29 May, 2010 05:00, Anonymous b2b directory said...

The best b2b business search facility for business, products, services, directory, dearch engine optimization company, marketing, advertising, SEO, Yellow Pages

 
At 30 May, 2010 12:14, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Yeah, it's funny how that works. It's funny that the only people who seem to figure out DURR TEH TRUTH ABOUT 9-11 DURRRRRRRRR are child molesters [Troy Sexton], or angry teenaged boys [The "Debunking Director"], or mental patients [Troy Sexton], or lifelong conspiracy hobbyists [Lazarus Long, Glenn Beck], or people with a book to sell [Popular Mechanics, Matt Taibbi], or aimless Internet trolls. [Triterope]

 
At 30 May, 2010 16:35, Blogger Triterope said...

Not bad. Good job making the response fit my comment. But you can't use the same person twice in a post like that. It makes it look like that's all you've got. And some of your pairings don't really fit. But you're improving.

 
At 31 May, 2010 15:41, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

Sideshow Bill blathers:
"And what do you offer in rebuttal?"

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mastermind of the 9/11 plot, at the time of his capture in 2003

That's what I have to offer "in rebuttal", you two-bit, brain damaged, epically delusional axe grinding supermoron.

 
At 31 May, 2010 15:43, Anonymous Anonymous #2 said...

By the way, have you figured out the fatal flaw in your "prosecutor pun" yet, epic supermoron?

You're the fucking ueberchampion of FAIL.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home