Thursday, December 15, 2011

Flight 93 Boarding Passes

Earlier we did a post on the boarding pass for Flight 93 hijacker Ziad Jarrah, now MikeW from 911Myths has obtained copies for the other hijackers and the passengers.  Reading through their names, although an important part of history, was rather unsettling.  Even more disturbing is the fact that there are people who think they never existed, never boarded the plane, or are living on a tropical island somewhere.

63 Comments:

At 16 December, 2011 08:43, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"...and if purported copies of boarding passes don't lead you to believe there's nothing to be investigated, or that no one should be held accountable, then nothing will!"
-Pat and James, inquisitive researchers

Feel free to "debunk" something, guys. Anything. We'll wait.

 
At 16 December, 2011 09:25, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Feel free to "debunk" something, guys. Anything. We'll wait.

I take it Cowardly is a No-Passengers bloke, in addition to No-Plane and No-Phone-Calls.

 
At 16 December, 2011 10:49, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

You 'take it' a LOT more ways than that, testicles.

Keep trying to read for comprehension, son. You'll get it some day.

 
At 16 December, 2011 11:05, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

You 'take it' a LOT more ways than that, testicles.

There are multiple ways? I guess you're the expert.

Keep trying to read for comprehension, son. You'll get it some day.

When you said that no plane hit the Pentagon, that's not what you meant? OK. What did you mean?

 
At 16 December, 2011 11:13, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Oh, lying about what I said. I see what you did there. How clever. great 'debunking', son. Hugh would be prouder of you than he ever was of Pat. Keep up the 'work'.


NEXT!

 
At 16 December, 2011 11:18, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Oh, lying about what I said.

What you said is a fact. If facts make you uncomfortable, perhaps you should spend less time on 9/11 debunking sites.

Let me guess -- global warming is a lie too, right? How about evolution? Surely, even Pat Cowardly isn't that bonkers.

 
At 16 December, 2011 11:30, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"What you said is a fact." -Testicles

"Assertions aren't evidence" -Pat Credulity

Now Testicles is rushing to the front of the line to be exposed as a liar, because he can't stand not getting enough attention.

Hugh's spirit is swelling with pride.

 
At 16 December, 2011 11:38, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

"What you said is a fact." -Testicles

You claimed that no plane hit the Pentagon. I can understand your embarrassment at saying it, but arguing about the fact of having said it makes you look foolish.

Besides, what's the big deal? Evolution denial is a much sicker derangement than any no-plane theory.

 
At 16 December, 2011 12:05, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Only the best "debunking" at SLC, folks. Read it and fear!!

-Pat and James

 
At 16 December, 2011 12:23, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Only the best "debunking" at SLC, folks. Read it and fear!!

Translation: "I can't refute a single word of this, and it's making me nervous. I'm going to laugh it off."

It's all right, laddie. I'll let you run away now. Keep those iron microspheres in your thoughts. One day you'll be skilled enough to blog on the level of John Paul George Ringo Michael Talboo or some other deep thinker.

 
At 16 December, 2011 19:10, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"...and if purported copies of boarding passes don't lead you to believe there's nothing to be investigated, or that no one should be held accountable, then nothing will!"
-Pat and James, inquisitive researchers

Feel free to "debunk" something, guys. Anything. We'll wait."....


How about we hold you accountable? Face it, some self-centered, inbread, retard exactly like you made it possible for 19 hijhackers to live, attend flight school, and board four seperate airliners.
Some asshole with the same sanctimonious ineptitude saw only what they wanted to see, and not what was really there.

You shit your bed, dumbass, now sleep in it.

 
At 17 December, 2011 14:08, Blogger premium-login.com said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 17 December, 2011 14:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Die spammer!

 
At 18 December, 2011 09:37, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"self-centered, inbread, retard..." -
-Peccary Fruitless

Inbread? Does that require baking?

Are you sure you're not Pat Obesity's sock puppet, accidentally referring to food with every post?

 
At 18 December, 2011 09:45, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Try to stay on topic, Fatty GutlessShill, or I'll squash your head like a grape...with your own pendulous bitchteats, or my own. Either way, asshole.
-Scat Hurling

 
At 18 December, 2011 09:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yo Cowardly,

I just proved that fly ash-based concrete was used extensively to construct the WTC towers.

Say goodbye to your iron-rich microspheres theory, 'tard.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Since you have no life, and your reason for living just went up in smoke, I expect that any moment now you'll hang yourself by the neck in your filthy, one-room shack.

Try not to leave too much of a mess. M'kay, ArseHoolgan?

Bon Appetit!

 
At 18 December, 2011 09:55, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Are you sure you're not Pat Obesity's sock puppet, accidentally referring to food with every post?

Obesity isn't safe ground for Truthers. Talboo's woman looks pretty hefty, and Burnan's sister has to be a good 16 stone.

Are you ready to discuss no-planes and microspheres again?

 
At 18 December, 2011 09:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Don't forget Jon "Never met a Big Mac I didn't Love" Gold.

Doesn't Cowardly shave Jon's back?

 
At 18 December, 2011 10:19, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Doesn't Cowardly shave Jon's back?

I know Cosmos does. Where do you think he gets the material for that beard?

I doubt Cowardly is Cosmos though. Cosmos has this laid-back, unfocused demeanor; Cowardly has a deranged fixation on about four topics. It's too much weed vs. too much crack.

 
At 18 December, 2011 10:24, Blogger GuitarBill said...

As Billman pointed out, Cowardly is Arhoolie. You can search the SLC archive and find a plethora of his nonsense.

 
At 18 December, 2011 14:43, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Pat Curley's sock puppets doing research again. Yikes...

Whatever you say, Mr. "iron is rust from concrete...no really!"

 
At 18 December, 2011 15:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still trying to pass off iron-rich microspheres as "elemental iron," douche nozzle?

The article from ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD from 31 October 1968, states that the contractor used "a mixture of high-early strength [Portland] cement, water and fly ash. The required 3,000 psi concrete was usually obtained in 72 hours."

Doh!

FACT: The aforementioned quote makes it clear that fly ash-based concrete was used to construct the WTC towers.

Fly ash, in case you're wondering, is composed of iron-rich microspheres.

Here's a photomicrograph made with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM): Fly ash particles at 2,000 x magnification.

Photographic source: Wikipedia: Fly ash iron-rich spheres.

And where did you get the idea that the iron-rich microspheres found at Ground Zero are "elemental iron"?

You'll be interested to know that your hero, Steven E. Jones, says you're full-of-shit--and I quote:

"...Oxygen is a major component of almost all the iron-aluminum spheres in the WTC dust I have studied--often the PRINCIPAL component." -- Steven E. Jones.

And then there's the RJ Lee Report, which also refutes your theory--and I quote:

"...Considering the high temperatures reached during the destruction of the WTC, the following three types of combustion products would be expected to be present in WTC Dust. These products are:

"• Iron-rich spheres from iron-bearing building components or contents."
-- RJ Lee Report, Page 16.

So what were you saying, Mr. Elemental Iron in the Dust?

 
At 18 December, 2011 15:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 18 December, 2011 15:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Oh, and I almost forgot to mention, ArseHooligan: How do you explain all the Silicon (Si) that Steven E. Jones' EDX spectra shows in the iron-rich microspheres?

FACT: Si is definitely NOT an ingredient of commercial thermite, thermate or "nanothermite."

One thing is for certain: I won't hold my breath waiting for your explanation.

And, whatever you do, don't look at the gaping hole in your argument. M'kay, ArseHooligan?

 
At 18 December, 2011 23:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGale, your ENR only discusses the slurry walls. There is no evidence that fly ash was used in the tower floors.

Your quote from Dr. Jones would seem to say OXYGEN is the primary component of the dust. Not iron. You're not very smart, are you?


The Si is explained by the sol-gel matrix in which the aluminum and iron oxide nanoparticles were embedded. You're not very smart, are you?
Why would you expect covert nanothermite experts to limit themselves to commercial products?

 
At 19 December, 2011 01:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker brays, "...Your quote from Dr. Jones would seem to say OXYGEN is the primary component of the dust. Not iron. You're not very smart, are you?"

That's my point--you cretin. You're not very smart, are you?

But, then again, since you're an illiterate, you probably missed the part where I wrote, "...And where did you get the idea that the iron-rich microspheres found at Ground Zero are "elemental iron"?"

Do you suffer from Attention Deficit Disorder? You're not very smart, are you?

The goat fucker brays, "...The Si is explained by the sol-gel matrix in which the aluminum and iron oxide nanoparticles [SIC] were embedded. You're not very smart, are you?"

There's no evidence for "nanothermite."

You're jumping to conclusions without the benefit of evidence. You're not very smart, are you?

Fly ash includes substantial amounts of silicon dioxide (SiO2), both amorphous and crystalline. You're not very smart, are you?

And why does Jones' EDX spectra for his dust samples look exactly like fly ash spectra? Oh, that's right! You can't read EDX spectra. You're not very smart, are you?

The goat fucker brays, "...Why would you expect covert nanothermite experts to limit themselves to commercial products?"

Another huge leap of logic garnished with babbling about mythical nanothermite elves. You're not very smart, are you?

FAIL.

 
At 19 December, 2011 09:18, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

Just throw something that contains math and science at Brian. It'll confuse him plus I like laughing at his sad attempts to say that Dr. Sunder "agrees" with him when it's clear that he doesn't.

 
At 19 December, 2011 09:50, Blogger snug.bug said...

So once again UtterFail is demonstrating his hypocrisy in citing a conspiracy website as a source.

UtterFail, the red/gray chips examined by Dr. Harrit and Dr. Jones are evidence for nanothermite. If you believe they are paint, it is your responsibility to demonstrate that.

And now you claim fly ash contains much silicon dioxide, but before you said "Yes, let's pretend that fly ash isn't composed of iron-rich microspheres." 12/14, 23:49 in the Lawyers thread.

TAW, I never said Dr. Sunder agrees with me--though it's likely that he does since I avoid theories and stick to irrefutable facts. You live in a comic-book world.

 
At 19 December, 2011 09:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I didn't cite a "conspiracy website" as a source. The source is an email exchange between Steven Jones and Frank Greening. Can you tell the difference between an email exchange and a "conspiracy website"? You're not very smart, are you?

Trying to pass off "iron-rich" as elemental iron, goat fucker? You're not very smart, are you?

And no one is impressed by, or gives as damn, about your deliberate misinterpretation of my words, gay boi. After all, you're not very smart, not to mention a compulsive liar and an illiterate.

FAIL.

 
At 19 December, 2011 10:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So, goat fucker, why don't you give up the futile attempts to assassinate my character and respond to the substance of my argument.

Oh, that's right! You can't do that because you're a compulsive liar, science illiterate and glue sniffing college dropout with an IQ of 70.

My bad.

"...Oxygen is a major component of almost all the iron-aluminum spheres in the WTC dust I have studied--often the PRINCIPAL component." -- Steven E. Jones.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Now, go for it, goat fucker. Try to pass off iron-rich microspheres as "elemental iron."

You're a LIAR--and Steven E. Jones' own EDX spectra TOTALLY CONTRADICTS YOUR IDIOTIC LIES AND BS.

Face it, you're full-of-shit up to your eyebrows, goat fucker.

FAIL.

 
At 19 December, 2011 10:27, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

TAW, I never said Dr. Sunder agrees with me--though it's likely that he does since I avoid theories and stick to irrefutable facts.

Dr. Sunder has stated in the press alot of times that it was the exterior panels that came down in 9 and 11 seconds for both Towers. Never once did he mention the NOVA interview.

Fact: Dr. Sunder was talking about the exterior panels.

Fact: NOVA is a media outlet where they talk about Bigfoot and other mythical beasts.

You live in a comic-book world.

I sure do, I'm like you. I have x-ray vision so I can see through those dust clouds, I have lasers coming out of my eyes so I can melt steel. I have the ability to leap a building in a single bound, defying gravity.

Yup, that's the comic book world you're in?

 
At 19 December, 2011 10:32, Blogger Ian said...

TAW, I never said Dr. Sunder agrees with me--though it's likely that he does since I avoid theories and stick to irrefutable facts. You live in a comic-book world.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Dr. Sunder doesn't agree with you, Brian. He's a serious scientist. You're a failed janitor who believes in magic thermite elves.

 
At 19 December, 2011 23:42, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, you are failing toi distinguish between direct evidence and hearsay. When you cite a conspiracy site's report on what Dr. Jones said, you are citing that conspiracy site's hearsay report.


TAW, your mistaken belief that Dr. Sunder was talking about panels is a favorite theme of WAQo. He never said anything about panels. He said Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

 
At 20 December, 2011 00:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker brays, "...you are failing toi [SIC] distinguish between direct evidence and hearsay. When you cite a conspiracy site's report on what Dr. Jones said, you are citing that conspiracy site's hearsay report."

Good job, spelling bee champ.

Goat fucker, you are arguably the most prolific bullshit artist and hypocrite I've ever encountered.

What's this, goat fucker?

"...The evidence of thermite was the presence of molten iron, the molten metal pouring out of WTC2 shortly before it came down, the sulfidation attacks on the Appendix C steel, the presence of exothermic mixtures of aluminum and iron in the dust, the presence of iron microspheres in the dust, and the symmetry and speed and totality of collapse." -- The Goat Fucker, 25 March 2011 10:08, from Pat's thread titled "Joshua Blakeny: Israel Did It (Maybe)"

No, you would NEVER try to pass off iron-rich microspheres as elemental iron, while you try to tout the bullshit "thermite" demolition theory, would you, goat fucker?

And you're not a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist, either. Right, goat fucker?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

So much for that putrid pile of goat fucker effluent. Let's move on, shall we?

So, if I intend to quote Steven E. Jones, who is largely ignored by the real scientific community, where should I go to find his verbiage? The ACSE's website? Or are my choices limited to websites that are exclusively endorsed by a sex predator, compulsive liar, science illiterate and college dropout who wears women's underwear?

FUCK YOU, HYPOCRITE!

So, what's up, goat fucker? You wouldn't throw you're fellow "truthers" under the bus, would you?

Of course you would, right goat fucker?

Once again, you FAIL, goat fucker.

 
At 20 December, 2011 01:25, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, you are the one who tried to assert the principle that one could not cite a source if one disputed the source's conclusion. Now, on pragmatic grounds, you are abandoning the principle. You are a hypocrite.

Your babbling about Si peaks and elemental iron makes no sense. You don't know whereof you speak.

 
At 20 December, 2011 01:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker brays, "...you are the one who tried to assert the principle that one could not cite a source if one disputed the source's conclusion."

I'm not citing Jones' conclusions--you fucking idiot. I'm citing his data.

Too bad that you're such an idiot that you don't know the difference between data and a conclusion.

FAIL.

The goat fucker dissembles, "...Your babbling about Si peaks and elemental iron makes no sense. You don't know whereof you speak."

More 100% fact-free bullshit, goat fucker?

You're trying to bury your latest humiliating defeat in dumbspam.

So what's new, felcher?

FAIL.

 
At 20 December, 2011 05:56, Blogger Ian said...

TAW, your mistaken belief that Dr. Sunder was talking about panels is a favorite theme of WAQo. He never said anything about panels. He said Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

False.

UtterFail, you are the one who tried to assert the principle that one could not cite a source if one disputed the source's conclusion. Now, on pragmatic grounds, you are abandoning the principle. You are a hypocrite.

Squeal squeal squeal!

 
At 20 December, 2011 11:08, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

TAW, your mistaken belief that Dr. Sunder was talking about panels is a favorite theme of WAQo. He never said anything about panels. He said Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

So what? People have seen the evidence on the NIST report, WAQ probably had the same thinking I did when I read about those exterior panels coming down from bother Towers at 9 and 11 seconds.

He "never" said anything about the panels you say? Well I've never seen him talk about the whole entire buildings coming down in 9 and 11 seconds in his NIST report. You're just using Dr. Sunder as a scapegoat for your own ignorance and stupidity. Hiding behind a famous person like a scared little boy that you truely are. How pathetic!

 
At 21 December, 2011 00:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGale, you have previously attacked me, claiming I can not cite evidence put forth in reports that put forth conclusions with which I do not agree.

Now you are permitting yourself to cite evidence from such reports, citing pragmatic factors and claiming that not citing the concolusion is a factor. Thanks for demonstrating your hypocrisy.

If you want to talk about Si peaks, you're going to have to specify what paper you're talking about.

Ian, Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

 
At 21 December, 2011 01:50, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker brays, "...you have previously attacked me, claiming I can not cite evidence put forth in reports that put forth conclusions with which I do not agree."

Still working on the difference between a conclusion and data, Goat fucker?

FAIL.

The goat fucker brays, "...Now you are permitting yourself to cite evidence from such reports, citing pragmatic factors and claiming that not citing the concolusion [SIC] is a factor. Thanks for demonstrating your hypocrisy."

You have it backwards, goat fucker. And, of course, you deliberately have it backwards.

I'm not disputing his data, I'm disputing his conclusion.

Data, in case you're wondering, has nothing to do with a conclusion. It's possible to have perfectly good data and arrive at an erroneous conclusion.

Proof?

You constantly take good data and arrive at idiotic conclusions.

Once again, you FAIL, goat fucker.

 
At 21 December, 2011 06:17, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

Stop lying, Brian.

 
At 21 December, 2011 10:06, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGale, you have tried to deny me the use of data from reports that have conclusions with which I disagree. For yourself you allow access to such data with the explanation "I'm not disputing his data, I'm disputing his conclusion." For me you allow no such exemption.

Your belief that data has nothing to do with a conclusion suggests who you find yourself unemployable today.

Ian, Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

 
At 21 December, 2011 10:09, Blogger Ian said...

ButtGale, you have tried to deny me the use of data from reports that have conclusions with which I disagree. For yourself you allow access to such data with the explanation "I'm not disputing his data, I'm disputing his conclusion." For me you allow no such exemption.

No, he's just not letting you draw wildly inaccurate conclusions from said data. You can't say that iron microspheres prove magic thermite.

Ian, Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

Brian, I've told you many times that re-posting the same lying spam doesn't make it more true. If you want the widows' questions answered, you're going to have to find something else to post.

 
At 21 December, 2011 10:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker dissembles, "...you have tried to deny me the use of data from reports that have conclusions with which I disagree."

False.

You never present data to back your argument. YOU CHERRY PICK THE CONCLUSIONS.

FAIL.

 
At 21 December, 2011 10:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker lies, "...Your belief that data has nothing to do with a conclusion suggests who you find yourself unemployable today."

False.

Again, idiot, it's entirely possible to have perfectly good data and reach erroneous conclusions.

Examples include Jones' "nanothermite" paper, and everything you've written to this blog.

I'm not employed for one reason and one reason only: I'm an employer. You're inability to distinguish between the employed and an employer explains why you're so confused about the events of 11 September 2001.

And don't forget, goat fucker, unlike you, my checks don't bounce.

 
At 21 December, 2011 12:25, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

Ian, Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts.

NOVA isn't a forensic company. They're not NIST quality.

But anyways since Dr. Sunder repeatedly stated in the NIST report and all other reports that it was the exterior panels that fell.

 
At 21 December, 2011 14:54, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I'm not drawing any inaccurate conclusions. I am trying to establish facts. For instance, that there was good evidence for molten steel. ButtGale refuses to accept evidence from official reports and tries to declare the figures from reports to be non-canonical texts.

I never said that iron microspheres prove thermite, and certainly not magic thermite. I never heard of magic thermite.

Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts. Anybody can read the transcript at NOVA and see that you're lying.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/tech/debunking-9-11-bomb-theories.html

ButtGale, the reason I rarely put much time into my posts here any more is because when I did, you and Ian would fire up the snow machine and bury it under lie-spam and dumb-spam. You two clowns have thus greatly degraded the quality of this forum--such that you have driven most of the intelligent posters away, and even most of the half-brights like DK and JR.


TAW, Dr. Sunder told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. Dr. Sunder said that, not NOVA. Dr. Sunder never said anything about panels. The FAQ tried to pass the "essentially in free fall" issue as panels, but this made no sense and was contradicted by Dr. Sunder's statement on NOVA a few days later.

 
At 21 December, 2011 15:22, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I'm not drawing any inaccurate conclusions. I am trying to establish facts.

No you're not, you're deluding yourself into believing what you want to believe.

For instance, that there was good evidence for molten steel.

See what I mean?

I never said that iron microspheres prove thermite, and certainly not magic thermite. I never heard of magic thermite.

That's good, because there is no evidence of thermite, and certainly iron microspheres don't suggest thermite.

Also, you're the one attributing magical properties to thermite. The sane people here understand there are limits to what thermite can do, and that the WTC were not destroyed by thermite.

Dr. Sunder didn't say anything about panels. He told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. You are making up your facts. Anybody can read the transcript at NOVA and see that you're lying.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/tech/debunking-9-11-bomb-theories.html


False.

ButtGale, the reason I rarely put much time into my posts here any more is because when I did, you and Ian would fire up the snow machine and bury it under lie-spam and dumb-spam.

My, such squealing! Poor Brian has been pwn3d repeatedly by me and GuitarBill and is reduced to this.

Good luck getting a new investigation, Brian! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!

TAW, Dr. Sunder told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. Dr. Sunder said that, not NOVA. Dr. Sunder never said anything about panels. The FAQ tried to pass the "essentially in free fall" issue as panels, but this made no sense and was contradicted by Dr. Sunder's statement on NOVA a few days later.

Stop lying, Brian.

 
At 21 December, 2011 17:02, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you lie and lie and lie and lie.

 
At 21 December, 2011 17:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Prodo Faggins squeals, "...the reason I rarely put much time into my posts here any more is because when I did, you and Ian would fire up the snow machine and bury it under lie-spam and dumb-spam."

That's right, goat fucker, blame us for your failure to substantiate your idiotic propaganda, revisionist history and lies.

FAIL.

 
At 21 December, 2011 20:34, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you lie and lie and lie and lie.

False.

 
At 22 December, 2011 00:26, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGale, I blame you for your dumb-spam and lie-spam and data-spam. That's why I no longer put effort into my posts here. Also, because the mods keep closing the threads and won't put my responses in.

Ian, you lie and lie and lie.

 
At 22 December, 2011 01:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Prodo Faggins whines, "...I blame you for your dumb-spam and lie-spam and data-spam."

That's right, goat fucker, always accuse your opponent of the crimes you commit. Good little neo-Fascist liar.

FAIL.

Prodo Faggins dissembles, "...That's why I no longer put effort into my posts here."

Revisionist history, I presume? That's strange, because I don't recall the mythical days when you allegedly substantiated your 100% fact-free propaganda.

Can you show us a few examples?

You can't?

Then may I suggest that you STFU.

FAIL.

Prodo Faggins whines, "...Also, because the mods keep closing the threads and won't put my responses in."

Squeal, squeal, squeal.

FAIL.

 
At 22 December, 2011 06:09, Blogger Ian said...

ButtGale, I blame you for your dumb-spam and lie-spam and data-spam. That's why I no longer put effort into my posts here. Also, because the mods keep closing the threads and won't put my responses in.

Poor Brian. He's running away squealing and crying because GuitarBill has pwn3d him again.

Ian, you lie and lie and lie.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Hey Brian, have the widows had their questions answered yet?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!

 
At 22 December, 2011 11:47, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, you know you're safe in demanding substantiation because you know that substantiation was destroyed when SLC switched to blogger from haloscan.

You and Ian habitually buried my well-sourced and thoughtful posts under a foot of lies and data-dumps, and I quit wasting my time.

Now I note that the mods seem to have a pattern of allowing all threads to be closed by a series of attacks on me, and they will not post my response.

 
At 22 December, 2011 12:08, Blogger Ian said...

UtterFail, you know you're safe in demanding substantiation because you know that substantiation was destroyed when SLC switched to blogger from haloscan.

Squeal squeal squeal!

You and Ian habitually buried my well-sourced and thoughtful posts under a foot of lies and data-dumps, and I quit wasting my time.

Which ones were these? "Meatball on a fork"? "Smoldering carpets"? "Pyroclastic flows"?

Brian, you've never done anything but post the kind of nonsense we'd expect from a delusional failed janitor. You certainly do continue to "waste your time", given that the truth movement is dead and none of your delusional goals will ever be achieved.

Now I note that the mods seem to have a pattern of allowing all threads to be closed by a series of attacks on me, and they will not post my response.

Hold on, we can fix that.

 
At 22 December, 2011 12:09, Blogger Ian said...

Here's the last thing I wrote in the other thread:

Everyone knows Brian Good is an unemployed janitor living on disability with his parents in Palo Alto, CA. He used to be an important member of AE911 Truth, but was expelled from the group for stalking Carol Brouillet. He spends his days posting tons of spam all over the internet as "petgoat", "punxsutawneybarney", "contrivance", "truebeleaguer", "truetruther", "watson", and a hundred other names. Wikipedia banned him for vandalizing the pages of the 2008 Chinese Olympic women's gymnastics team.

Then Mike gave plenty of examples of you spamming the internet under different names, including the ones above.

Care to respond?

 
At 22 December, 2011 12:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker dissembles, "..you know you're safe in demanding substantiation because you know that substantiation was destroyed when SLC switched to blogger from haloscan."

This pile of crap is the equivalent of "the dog ate my homework."

It didn't fly for you in grade school, goat fucker, and it won't fly at SLC.

FAIL.

The fact is that you don't substantiate your argument because you have nothing. ZIP. ZILCH. NADA. ZERO.

In addition, you steadfastly refuse to cite "credible" sources because we've caught you lying and quote mining so many times now that you don't DARE substantiate your idiotic argument.

FAIL.

 
At 22 December, 2011 13:27, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

TAW, Dr. Sunder told NOVA that Tower 2 fell in 9 seconds and Tower 1 fell in 11 seconds. Dr. Sunder said that, not NOVA. Dr. Sunder never said anything about panels. The FAQ tried to pass the "essentially in free fall" issue as panels, but this made no sense and was contradicted by Dr. Sunder's statement on NOVA a few days later.


I bet you don't have a story that corraborates with the NOVA interview, do you Brian?

In order for the NOVA interview to be true, you need another interview that confirms it.

Without it you've got nothing angry little man.

 
At 22 December, 2011 14:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

TAW, Dr. Sunder is on tape at NOVA. He said what he said.

Ian, at least 2/3 of your statement is a lie for which you have no evidence whatsoever.

 
At 22 December, 2011 18:57, Blogger Ian said...

TAW, Dr. Sunder is on tape at NOVA. He said what he said.

False.

Ian, at least 2/3 of your statement is a lie for which you have no evidence whatsoever.

False. Everything I said has been confirmed by multiple sources. You, a deranged liar, are in no position to challenge it.

 
At 22 December, 2011 19:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you lie and lie. Anyone can google ....Sunder NOVA.... and see that you lie. Your "multiple sources" are bigots like Dr. Kevin Barrett and lying con-artists, and idiots like you.

 
At 22 December, 2011 19:49, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you lie and lie. Anyone can google ....Sunder NOVA.... and see that you lie. Your "multiple sources" are bigots like Dr. Kevin Barrett and lying con-artists, and idiots like you.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Brian, my sources are impeccable. They've made it clear that you're a liar and lunatic who was expelled from the truth movement. Now you have a vendetta against them, so you spend every waking hour spamming the internet with hundreds of IDs in a futile attempt to make said sources look bad.

And everyone has googled "Sunder NOVA". I have too. That's how we know everything you say about him is false.

Sorry, Brian, but I win again. You remain a failed janitor who will never get the widows questions answered. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home