Monday, November 19, 2012

Hillary Goes Truther!

No, not really. It's a plot development in September Morn, the Truther film featuring Ed Asner, Woody Harrelson and Martin Sheen, which has yet again run into difficulties:

Due to contractual differences - Fleur Des Lis Film Studios will not be producing my feature film screenplay “September Morn” as they announced on October 16th.

To drum up interest, Howard Cohen is making the screenplay available for free download here. Basically, the story is that Hillary holds a hearing in her office, where Truthers like David Ray Griffin and the idiot Neils Harrit present their evidence (cellphones don't work in planes, the hole at the Pentagon is too small, tons of nanothermite were used in the towers and Flight 93 was shot down). Hillary is obviously impressed and at the end of the film a newscaster announces that the President (presumably Obama) has authorized a new investigation of 9-11.

I'm thinking Woody would be perfect as Hillary.

Update: Sunjata with September Mourn:

It is with DEEP sadness and great disappointment that I announce #SeptemberMorn has fallen to pieces. If the film ever gets made, it will be no time soon. Internal conflicts above my pay-grade have resulted in the indefinite derailing of the project. It's been Sabotaged. #911 #911Truth.
 Sabotaged?  Does that mean it was an inside job?

33 Comments:

At 19 November, 2012 17:10, Blogger Ian said...

Why do they present their evidence to the Secretary of State? Wouldn't Eric Holder be a more logical choice?

Oh wait, I just suggested the truther behave according to the rules of logic.

 
At 19 November, 2012 18:19, Blogger The Locke said...

If Truthers held to logic there would be no Truthers.

 
At 19 November, 2012 20:34, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

...and the Vince Foster's ghost materializes and reveals that JFK and Marilyn Monroe master-minded 9/11 from their secret island retreat. JFK is now half-man, half transforming robot. Marilyn is a vampire.

Sorry, just trying to jazz up the script...

 
At 19 November, 2012 23:13, Blogger snug.bug said...

You would. Being somewhat bored with mere facts.

 
At 19 November, 2012 23:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Oh look! Another thread for Brian Good to hijack and use as a vehicle to flog his homosexual obsession for William Rodriguez.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 20 November, 2012 04:45, Blogger Ian said...

You would. Being somewhat bored with mere facts.

We actually enjoy pointing out various facts to you, like the fact that you failed out of San Jose State, the fact that you're an unemployed janitor, the fact that you've been banned from AE911Truth for stalking Carol Brouillet, etc. etc.

 
At 20 November, 2012 05:19, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

Yup...all the typical mental drooling we have come to know and love from "the truth" The snowball begins at p. 21 with Grifters "official conspiracy theory" equivocation fallacy. Definitely a film for the not too bright.

 
At 20 November, 2012 15:20, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Remember when Pat said that the wings of flight 77 were 'sheared off' and 'consumed in a fireball'? Funny how he never provided a shred of evidence for his assertion, nor did anyone else.

What was the source for this claim of yours, Patrick?

Are you just going to clam up with embarrassment again?

 
At 20 November, 2012 15:32, Blogger Pat said...

Oh, so you're a Pentagon no-planer idiot?

 
At 20 November, 2012 15:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

No, Cowardly is merely a world-class, general purpose idiot.

Make sure to lock up your children and livestock if he decides to visit your neighborhood.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 20 November, 2012 16:35, Blogger James B. said...

Geez, that is bad writing even by truther standards.

 
At 20 November, 2012 17:07, Blogger James B. said...

"Gage claps his hands ten times. Everyone in the room is
startled.
MR. GAGE (CONT’D)
I can't even clap my hands ten
times in a second - can you Dr.
Sunder? "

LOL Sofia is back!

 
At 20 November, 2012 19:50, Blogger Pat said...

Oh, yeah, James, that got a horselaugh from me, too!

 
At 20 November, 2012 19:59, Blogger Ian said...

Oh, so you're a Pentagon no-planer idiot?

Brian Good should be here shortly to stalk him about his no plane idiocy.

 
At 21 November, 2012 06:10, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

Damn...they should rename this movie to Klunkity Klunk

 
At 21 November, 2012 07:38, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"Oh, so you're a Pentagon no-planer idiot?" -Pat Curley

Where did I say that? Nice try at dodging, though, you sad, fat old man. I'm sure GrandmasDress was fooled.

Try again: what is the source for your claim, other than your imagination? I thought you called yourself a "debunker"? Help him out, James. He's getting desperate.



 
At 21 November, 2012 09:53, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Remember when Pat said that the wings of flight 77 were 'sheared off' and 'consumed in a fireball'?

Pat never said that.

Try your hand at fantasy fiction or something. Evidence-based scientific research is beyond your grasp.

 
At 21 November, 2012 12:56, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Why did you shut your fat face again, Pat? If I were a "debunker", I'd cite my sources with confidence, but you're acting like a liar and coward again.

Just answer the question or retract your claim. It's quite easy, unless you're content being a portly pretendebunker who likes to shit on people's graves by lying about 9/11. Is that what you are, Pat?

 
At 21 November, 2012 12:57, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Better turn on Comment Moderation so you can dodge more questions, fat man.

 
At 21 November, 2012 14:33, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Just answer the question or retract your claim.

Pat never made the claim you attribute to him. There's nothing for him to retract.

Quickly now, respond with funny names and vaguely homosexual Anglicisms.

 
At 22 November, 2012 01:49, Blogger Pat said...

Yeah, I googled "consumed in a fireball" and this site and all I found was Pat Cowardly's brain. And man, did that stink!

 
At 22 November, 2012 04:18, Blogger Jennie Pulliam said...

straight talk promo codes
I really enjoy while I read your blogs and articles.

 
At 22 November, 2012 07:05, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

Must be sad Cosmo that even in fiction the "truth" can only conjure nonsensical ramblings from pseudo-experts.

 
At 22 November, 2012 22:46, Blogger Ashley Garrick said...

Interesting, just a little more interested with the comments made.. :D
_________________________
Ashley | 12BET

 
At 24 November, 2012 16:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

Gosh, GMS, do you fallaciously overgeneralize much?

 
At 25 November, 2012 08:34, Blogger Ian said...

Well, I see Brian has been released from the mental hospital and is back to denying that the truth "movement" is a tiny cult of liars and lunatics.

 
At 25 November, 2012 09:49, Blogger snug.bug said...

It thinks it's funny.

 
At 25 November, 2012 09:51, Blogger snug.bug said...

Also, where's Wizzie LiedRugAs? Still conducting his triumphal tour of South America? Is it true that he promised to pay for the college education of Pablo Ortiz's orphans because he stole their daddy's hero story?

 
At 25 November, 2012 11:33, Blogger Ian said...

It thinks it's funny.

It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.

Also, where's Wizzie LiedRugAs?

Why should any of us care. You're the only one with a pathetic homosexual obsession with the man, remember?

Still conducting his triumphal tour of South America? Is it true that he promised to pay for the college education of Pablo Ortiz's orphans because he stole their daddy's hero story?

Poor Brian. He's hysterical because the brave hero Willie Rodriguez is not interested in a homosexual relationship with a mentally ill unemployed janitor who believes in invisible widows with "questions".

 
At 25 November, 2012 12:23, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

Gosh, GMS, do you fallaciously overgeneralize much?

How so? It's in the script. Brian, please stop using hte the word "fallacy". You prove time & time again you don't know what the word even means.

 
At 25 November, 2012 16:43, Blogger snug.bug said...

It's in the script that the truth can only conjure nonsensical ramblings from pseudo-experts?

Where in the script is that? You seem to be unable to distinguish between what's in the script and what's in your interpretation of the script.

What's fallacious about your generalization is that you suppose that what you consider nonsensical ramblings in some guy's movie script somehow supports on inference that it represents a larger truth.

 
At 25 November, 2012 19:48, Blogger Ian said...

Brian, he already told you to stop using "fallacy" since you don't understand what it means. And yet you're still making a fool out of yourself by using it again.

It's like your inability to understand what the word "widow" means.

 
At 25 November, 2012 20:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

False generalizations are logical fallacies, Ian.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home