Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Box Boy's Biggest Deal Ever!

If the Truthers think we insult their intelligence (and we do!) check out Gage's latest offer.

AE911truth must grow and change in order to create and handle the realities of the forthcoming critical mass of public awareness.
That’s why we are inviting you to play a key role by becoming a valued Member of AE911Truth today.
 He's created a dozen different levels of membership; from the Student Level at $30 a year to the Diamond Circle of Torchbearers at a whopping $50,000 per annum.  In return, he's giving out lots of goodies, like a Tee shirt, a coffee mug, and a signed copy of one of his posters.  At the higher levels, you also get Plaques of Appreciation, and the privilege of picking up the phone and dialing Richard, or one of the board members.  Such a deal!

I particularly like the neato graphic that Gage included to demonstrate the "tipping point":

You can tell this is a serious organization dedicated to the lives we lost on 9-11.




216 Comments:

At 11 December, 2012 17:12, Blogger The Locke said...

It's like the 700 Club for Truthers!

 
At 11 December, 2012 17:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer, The True Believer

Yep, 9/11 troof is nothing more than a racket designed to sell trinkets and lies to the gullible.

Richard Gage -- racketeer for 9/11 troof.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 11 December, 2012 18:40, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

Note to AE9/11 Troof:

If the Bigfoot Research guys can do it without paid memberships, so can you.

Be like the Bigfoot guys,this way you will be at least as credible.

Your welcome.

 
At 11 December, 2012 19:11, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

I particularly like the neato graphic that Gage included to demonstrate the "tipping point":

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the source of that graphic is a blog about making money online. AE911Truth's failure to properly attribute the image is probably just an oversight.

 
At 11 December, 2012 22:36, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 11 December, 2012 23:13, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh I get it! SLC is reinventing itself as a fashion blog!

RGT, have you considered the fact that as a non-profit corporation AE911Truth is in the business of selling information and ideas but not making money?

So why shouldn't they draw their inspiration from online entrepreneurs?

 
At 11 December, 2012 23:41, Blogger Pat said...

Bill, that's one of my top ten books of all time.

RGT, Gage did a presentation to an MLM group, where the whole Phase I package, which cost about $6000 IIRC, was basically designed to help you sell more Phase I packages to others. Looks like Gage learned that lesson well.

 
At 12 December, 2012 04:20, Blogger navneet bansal said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12 December, 2012 07:38, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

"Bill, that's one of my top ten books of all time."

and the rest are comic books, written for children.

Are you ever going to get around to debunking anything, fat man?

Ever?

 
At 12 December, 2012 09:56, Blogger snug.bug said...

These guys seem to be clueless about the fact that social entrepreneurs who sell ideas for no profit use some of the same effective business techniques as commercial entrepreneurs who sell goods and services for a profit.

 
At 12 December, 2012 10:16, Blogger Mike Rosefierce said...

Gage didn't use my suggestions

$50/yr Bronze Brigade of Bullshit Buyers
$100/yr Copper Coterie of Crackpots
$250/yr Silver Syndicate of Suckers
$500/yr Gold Gaggle of Gullibles
$1000/yr Platinum Posse of Paranoids
$2500/yr Sapphire Society of Saps
$5000/yr Ruby Regiment of Reality Rejecters
$10K/yr Diamond Drove of Dupes
$50K/yr Feldspar Fellowship of Fruitcakes
$100K/yr Lapis Lazuli Legion of Lunatics

 
At 12 December, 2012 10:31, Blogger snug.bug said...

So MR, I take it that you're satisfied with half an investigation that admits that it can't fulfil its #1 objective, and leaves unexplained the ten essential mysteries of the towers' demise?

Why are you satisfied with that?

Because you are not curious about the mysteries?

Because you are happy with the answers you have and you don't want to lose them?

Because you think the Bushcists did the right thing in furthering an agenda of military domination of the world and police-state powers at home?

What rational reason is there to object to addressing the unanswered questions and producing complete, honest, and believable reports?

What rational reason is there to object to undertaking new computer models to explain the collapses, which NIST admitted they could not explain?

 
At 12 December, 2012 11:54, Blogger Mike Rosefierce said...

Answers:
(1-5) Dishonest premise. (6) Anyone who disagrees with or thinks they can improve upon NIST report is free to present their findings in a scholarly journal or conference. (7) Don't worry, more advanced models will be run someday. Then you'll have more confirmation as to whether your mass-homicidal elevator mechanics and demonic cleanup crews are real or just paranoid imaginings caused by your taking too much acid in the '60s. I know where to place my bet. (8) Get a job and move out of your mother's apartment. (OK, you didn't really have a question #8, but you should heed the answer anyway)

 
At 12 December, 2012 11:54, Blogger Mike Rosefierce said...

Speaking of donations, can I pay Google to come up with an "Ignore User" feature for its Blogger service?

 
At 12 December, 2012 12:14, Blogger snug.bug said...

What's dishonest about the premise in question 1?

What's dishonest about the premise in question 2?

What's dishonest about the premise in question 3?

What's dishonest about the premise in question 4?

What's dishonest about the premise in question 5?

Does a question that elicits a "no" answer have to be dishonest?

Where do you get the idea that anyone is free to present his or her findings in scholarly journals and conferences? Do you really believe that?

If more advanced models will be run someday, then why not run some now?

Where do you get the idea that I have mass-homicidal elevator mechanics?

Why don't you just stick to the facts instead of indulging in ridiculous fantasies about journal access, and straw man arguments?
Why not retain a little dignity and the illusion of objectivity?

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So Brian, in grade school, were you held back a grade, or three?

Just asking, retard.

And yes, you did lie about homicidal elevator mechanics. I guess we can senility to your wonderful personal qualities, too.

A senile compulsive liar, what a charming combination.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So goat fucker why did you lie about your homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy theory?

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Brian "snug.bug" Good, 27 December 2010

Any more bald-faced lies for us, felcher?

So are you senile or a compulsive liar?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Oh, by the way, goat fucker, be sure to tell us that you're not a conspiracy theorist. Okay, liar?

Fucking retard.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:31, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:33, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGoo, if you would try to curb your logorrheic tic you might have a better chance of making sense. I don't know how a supposedly grown person can fail to understand that if I tell you what Dr. Jones says, that does not mean that I share his views. I just reported what he said. I could just as logically claim that you believe in homicidal elevator mechanics because you report what I said. I never accused the elevator mechanics of any crime.

Of course there is the issue that they ran away from a burning building knowing that people were trapped in elevator cars secured with interlock devices they had themselves installed that made it very difficult to escape from those cars without the benefit of their specialized knowledge. And they will have to live with that for the rest of their lives.

But I never said they were homicidal, though I suppose the term "depraved indifference" might turn up in some people's thoughts.


 
At 12 December, 2012 13:33, Blogger Len said...

Actually top level membership in $100,000/year for which you get a plaque, mug, poster, some DVDs and some self help courses. By contrast the top level of membership at NYC's PBS station is $ 1,500/year

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Lying Brian Good lies, "... if I tell you what Dr. Jones says, that does not mean that I share his views."

Yeah, you don't agree with Dr. Jones conspiracy theory. That explains why you began your post with the words, "Ian, the fact is that...[blah][blah][blah]."

Yeah, you don't agree with Jones, but his theory is a "fact."

Fuck off -- you double-talking bullshitter.

I've heard more coherent things from a schizophrenic with Tourette's.

Once again, you FAIL -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 13:45, Blogger Mike Rosefierce said...

snug.bug said...
[more endless, pointless questions aimed at keeping afloat the most absurdly unworkable conspiracy theory ever conceived...]

Sorry petgoat, but I'm not going to further contribute to your blatant thread hijack.

There are sites that allow you to start threads on any topic you please. This isn't one of them.

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

The fact is blah blah blah and Dr. Jones says. Your inability to parse the logic in simple declarative sentences goes a long way to explain why your IT career went to Pakistan.

So MR, you dodge all the questions by declaring them dishonest--except for two that you answer with lies.

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You're the one who claims Jones' theory is a "fact," liar.

Anyone can read you bullshit and determine that you're a liar.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Brian "snug.bug" Good, 27 December 2010

So goat fucker, why do you insist on proving that the smartest thing ever to come out of your mouth was a penis?

It's scary to think that people like you are allowed to breed. I guess it's a blessing for the human race that you're a homosexual.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:15, Blogger snug.bug said...

When did I ever claim a theory was a fact? Learn to read. All those claims are facts. The last one was the fact that Dr. Jones has suggested what he suggested.

If you knew how to think you wouldn't be so confused about 9/11.

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:20, Blogger Mike Rosefierce said...

snug.bug said...
So MR, you dodge all the questions

What I'm "dodging" is conversation with a barking pseudoscientific lunatic, which you have repeatedly demonstrated yourself to be.

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

And where did you get your degree in psychology, Dr. Rosefierce? When did I demonstrate myself to be a lunatic?

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...When did I ever claim a theory was a fact?"

You claimed Jones' theory is a fact when you used the word "fact" -- you microcephalic cretin.

Shit for brains whines, "...When did I demonstrate myself to be a lunatic? "

You demonstrate your lunacy every time your liver-spotted hands touch your semen-encrusted keyboard, gay boi.

You're so daft that you act as though your lunacy is a virtue.

Now go back to 911flogger and hijack their threads, asshole. Oh, that's right! You're banned from 911flogger. Cretin.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:49, Blogger snug.bug said...

It's a fact that Dr. Jones suggests, you big, fat, saggy manboob. Jeez! You were home-skooled by wolves, weren't you.

Speaking of 911blogger, where's your hero, Old Jiggle-Cheeks? And how come you (with your claimed degree in applied mathematics) can't figure out that if less than 1% of the 15,000 office workers under the impact zone died, then Willie's claims that he saved hundreds are a bald-faced lie?

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:50, Blogger snug.bug said...

I bet you know everything there is to know about squirrels and chipmunks and voles, right?

 
At 12 December, 2012 14:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Anyone can read your bullshit and see that I'm telling the truth.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Brian "snug.bug" Good, 27 December 2010

In fact, ANYONE CAN CLICK ON THE HYPERLINK I PROVIDE AND SEE THAT SPENT AND ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR HOMICIDAL ELEVATOR MECHANIC CONSPIRACY THEORY.

No, you're not a conspiracy theorist -- which explains why you spent the entire thread defending your loony theory.

Once again, you FAIL -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

Any reasonable person who looks can see that I don't have an elevator mechanic conspiracy theory and that you are a liar.

I said the elevator operations provided cover for possible nefarious agents working in the 15 miles of elevator shafts during the 9 months the renovations were going on. That is a fact. It's a fact that I said that, and it's a fact that the ops provided cover.

I don't know why you have such trouble distinguishing fact from theory, but when you do it's nop wonder you're so confused about 9/11.

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:07, Blogger snug.bug said...

NOP wonder! I made a funny! That's my new name for UtterFail, the NOP wonder of Silicon Gutter.

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:15, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

GoiterBile intentionally misrepresents what is said in several different reports, further proving how feeble his and Pat's "debunking" really is.

Pat knows this, and can't do anything about it. What a sad life. Good thing he has those comic books...

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

No, you're not a conspiracy theorist, THAT'S WHY YOU SPENT THE ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR INSANE CONSPIRACY THEORY.

And this also explains why you give your 100% fact-free conspiracy theories advance billing as "fact."

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Brian "snug.bug" Good, 27 December 2010

Does your mommy -- you know, the enabler who has mollycoddled you all your miserable life -- know that you're a compulsive liar?

Once again, you FAIL -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:25, Blogger snug.bug said...

I don't have a conspiracy theory, NOP Wonder. You do, however--unless you believe 9/11 was perpetrated by a lone nut.

Is it only I that you attack as a liar when my conditional thinking is too subtle for you, or do you accuse others of lying too--for instance, the clerk who wants to know if you want fries with that?

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

No, you don't have a conspiracy theory, which explains why you spent an entire thread defending your idiotic conspiracy theory.

You can lie until you're blue in the face, gay boi, BUT THE HYPERLINK I PROVIDE BRINGS THE LIE TO YOUR NONSENSE.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Brian "snug.bug" Good, 27 December 2010

So why did spend the ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY? Why did you give your conspiracy theory advance billing as "fact"?

You lie first, last and always.

Should we expect less from a sex predator? Probably not.

Once again, you FAIL -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

I can't answer when you ask me why I did something I didn't do. I'm sorry you find this frustrating. Maybe you should save up for a new X-Box and leave the thinking to the grown-ups.

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's not an answer, scumbag, it's an evasion.

ANYONE WHO CLICKS ON THE LINK CAN SEE THAT YOU SPENT THE ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR HOMICIDAL ELEVATOR MECHANIC CONSPIRACY THEORY.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Brian "snug.bug" Good, 27 December 2010

You can lie until you're blue in the face, faggot, but the link I provide brings the lie to your nonsense. For example, from the same thread we find the following:

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died. " -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

You can run, goat fucker, but you can't hide.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Now answer the questions, liar:

So why did YOU spend the ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY? Why did you give your conspiracy theory advance billing as "fact"?

Once again, you FAIL, -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 15:56, Blogger snug.bug said...

I didn't defend a conspiracy theory, ButtGale. Do you think your gaseous emissions improve with repetition?

 
At 12 December, 2012 16:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Right, goat fucker! That's why the direct quotes I provide above prove you're a liar.

From the same thread we find the following:

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 December 2010.

No, you didn't spend the ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR HOMICIDAL ELEVATOR MECHANIC THEORY, THAT'S WHY I CAN DREDGE UP DIRECT QUOTE AFTER DIRECT QUOTE THAT PROVES YOU'RE A GODDAMNED LIAR.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Once again, you FAIL, asshole.


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 16:07, Blogger snug.bug said...

It is not a conspiracy theory to note that someone's behavior is peculiar, ButtGoo. You seem to confuse the gathering of information with a conspiracy theory--probably because you only go looking for information when you've got a point you want to try to support.

You're only making a fool of yourself Mr. NOP Wonder of Silicon Gutter.

 
At 12 December, 2012 16:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Go for it, goat fucker, lie while the evidence stares you straight in your ferret face:

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

Shall I dredge up more evidence that proves you're a liar and an insane conspiracy theorist?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Now answer the questions, liar:

So why did YOU spend the ENTIRE THREAD DEFENDING YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY? Why did you give your conspiracy theory advance billing as "fact"?


Once again, you FAIL, asshole.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 12 December, 2012 16:44, Blogger snug.bug said...

Your belief that what I said was lies is out of the realm of reality UtterFool. I knew that Ian was going to drag you all down to his level if you tolerated his lies. You think you can make something true just by saying it. You've lost your marbles.

 
At 12 December, 2012 16:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Direct quotes aren't "lies" -- you insane cock smoker.

You're so depraved that you'll continue to lie while the evidence states you straight in your ferret face. In fact, you're so insane that you don't know when you're making a fool of yourself.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

Your lies and smears are as transparent as the air between your ears.

Would YOU care to provide proof to support your theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

You're a disgrace to humanity -- a shit-eating maggot.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 13 December, 2012 00:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

I don't consider it a smear to point out the fact that 80 elevator mechanics who knew people were trapped in their elevators in a burning building ran away instead of helping the people get out.

 
At 13 December, 2012 00:23, Blogger Pat said...

Actually top level membership in $100,000/year for which you get a plaque, mug, poster, some DVDs and some self help courses

No, Len, that's a one-time donation of 100 Gs; even Gage isn't delusional enough to think that someone will do that more than once.

 
At 13 December, 2012 06:33, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Whoa Pat! You corrected someone else's falsehood AND did some research! Too bad it wasn't related to any of the siginificant questions that you usually ignore like a quivering coward, but I guess we can't expect too much from pretendebunkers like you.

 
At 13 December, 2012 09:55, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 13 December, 2012 10:48, Blogger snug.bug said...


Still, they have some great fashion and grooming tips, and GutterBall's illuminating homosexual lexicon--why, he's got words I never heard of for stuff I never thought of!--and of course RGT's dogged research into images.

 
At 13 December, 2012 12:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

And what's with this "Box Boy" thing? Do those who ridicule Mr. Gage's demonstration really think that his use of vernacular materials to illustrate physical principles negates the physical principles he is demonstrating?

 
At 13 December, 2012 13:18, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

Especially when Chris Mohr breaks a little stick to demonstrate 81 columns failing in WTC7, and pretendebunkers feign total agreement with him.

As pathetic as Pat wearing his Superman jeggings.

 
At 13 December, 2012 14:22, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"RGT, have you considered the fact that as a non-profit corporation AE911Truth is in the business of selling information and ideas but not making money?"

It's worthless information. This makes it a scam.

 
At 13 December, 2012 14:35, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

" objective, and leaves unexplained the ten essential mysteries of the towers' demise?"

There aren't 10 mysteries. There are just ten lies foisted by shit-eating baboons with a cowardly political agenda.


"Because you are not curious about the mysteries?"

Why has nobody in AE9/11 Truth addressed the mystery of the tens of thousands of urinal cakes in the towers and WTC7 that vanished? Why are they curious about that? It might point to a clue to prove their CD theory....

...or maybe like the other mysteries they aren't that important to the big picture.

"Because you are happy with the answers you have and you don't want to lose them?"

The facts of 9/11 haven't changed in 11 years.

"Because you think the Bushcists did the right thing in furthering an agenda of military domination of the world and police-state powers at home?"

What Bush/Obama did after 9/11/2001 is a separate issue.

"What rational reason is there to object to addressing the unanswered questions and producing complete, honest, and believable reports?"

All of the official reports are believable. The only people who don't think so are brain damaged, molest children, murder family members while on a meth high, shoot Congress reps, and sexually harass female radio talk-show hosts. Why the fuck would anybody care what drek like this thinks about anything?

"What rational reason is there to object to undertaking new computer models to explain the collapses, which NIST admitted they could not explain?"

Nobody's objecting to this. It is still a free country. You, Brian, can pay MIT right now to construct a simulation, and run it. You - Brian - can pay Sandia Labs to construct a new computer model of the WTC, and then recreate the attacks, fires, and whatever else you want. You - Brian - can hire private detectives in NYC, Washington, and elsewhere to dig up and answer all of your questions.

You have been free to do this since 9/12/2001.

What is taking you so long?

 
At 13 December, 2012 15:47, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Especially when Chris Mohr breaks a little stick to demonstrate 81 columns failing in WTC7, and pretendebunkers feign total agreement with him.

Mohr's stick is valid to illustrate possibility. Gage's boxes are invalid to illustrate impossibility. Same with Shaddock's eggs.

Rick Shaddock, incidentally, takes a little too much money from the Federal government to be trusted as a 9/11 Truth activist.

 
At 13 December, 2012 17:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

Where do you get the idea that Gage's boxes illustrate impossibility?

 
At 13 December, 2012 17:47, Blogger snug.bug said...

MGF, I commented earlier on
ButtGoiter's mental deterioration, which I attributed in part to the corrosion of his mind by his tolerance for Ian's fatuous lies.

I'm seeing mental deterioration amongst a lot of depukers lately. Whassamatter, dude? The drugs don't work like they usedta?

 
At 13 December, 2012 18:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

RGT, that's a pretty crude dichotomy--possibility/impossibility.

So you're saying that Mohr's stick demo is only to show that stuff can break?

And where did you get the idea that Gage's demo is meant to show that stuff can't break?

And isn't PC right to lampoon the hypocrites who mount a straw man criticism of Gage because cardboard boxes are not a valid model of the WTC, but apply a lesser standard of precision (stuff breaks) to Mohr's demo?



 
At 13 December, 2012 18:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

How does you getting your ass handed to you as a result of your smears and innuendo equal my "mental deterioration"?

Think before you write -- you delusional liar. Do you even read the things that come out of your semen-encrusted keyboard?

Why do you act as though your stupidity is a virtue?


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 13 December, 2012 18:33, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

RGT, that's a pretty crude dichotomy--possibility/impossibility.

Try could-have / should-have. Mohr says "the Towers could have behaved like this stick"; Gage says "the Towers should have behaved like this box". You're correct, it's a simple dichotomy, but it does tend to sail over Truther heads.

 
At 13 December, 2012 18:54, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh my! In ButtGoiter's 'RhoidRage he can't tell that when he thinks he's handing my butt to me, in fact he's handing his butt to me. (No thanks!)

Does Mohr really go to the trouble to do a physical demo of what could have happened? That seems like a poor rhetorical strategy.

Where does Gage say the towers should have behaved like the box?

 
At 13 December, 2012 19:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's hilarious coming from a con man who doesn't have a shred of evidence to support his idiotic conspiracy theories. All you have are lies, logical fallacies, innuendo and smears. Do you honestly think your replies are the product of "intelligence" rather than mendacity?

Do you always lie, even at the risk of looking ridiculous?

And remember, cretin, if you aspire to be a smart-ass, it's a good idea to be smart. Otherwise you're just an ass.


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 13 December, 2012 19:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 13 December, 2012 19:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

ButtGoiter, your "flipping" (accusing me of what you do) is noted. It's a tactic right out of the BushBot playbook.

BTW, how's your hero, Old Jiggle-Cheeks, doing? And how come you (with your claimed degree in applied mathematics) can't figure out that if less than 1% of the 15,000 office workers under the impact zone died, then Willie's claims that he saved hundreds are a bald-faced lie?

How does it feel to be fooled by a lying janitor?

 
At 13 December, 2012 19:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Accusing your opponent of the crimes you commit is your tactic, liar.

For example, when do you plan to answer the question I asked you up-thread?

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

Now lie, obfuscate and engage in misdirection tactics, liar.


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 13 December, 2012 20:02, Blogger snug.bug said...

Gosh, GoiterButt, I shouldn't have to tell you that your question would not be legally permissible in a court of law, because it assumes facts not in evidence.

How does it feel to be gulled by a lying janitor, fool?

 
At 13 December, 2012 20:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

False.

The evidence is spread up and down this thread, liar. E.g.,

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 Decemberber 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

As anyone can see, the quotes I provide prove you're a conspiracy theorist. They also prove that you offer no evidence against the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics. Your entire argument is based on innuendo and smear.

Innuendo n.pl. an indirect or subtle reference, esp one made maliciously or indicating criticism or disapproval; insinuation; defamation.

Smear v. tr. To stain or attempt to destroy the reputation of; vilify.

Now answer the question, degenerate.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 13 December, 2012 20:42, Blogger snug.bug said...

Where's the conspiracy, GoiterButt? Nothing but fact there.

You seem to confuse quantity with substance. Not too smart. How does it feel to be gulled by a janitor, fool?

 
At 13 December, 2012 20:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Half-truths, innuendo and smears are not "facts," cretin.

You proposed a conspiracy theory which isn't premised on a single "fact." You have defended your idiotic homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy theory on several occasions, often hijacking an entire thread in the process, while relying on innuendo and smear as a substitute for real evidence. For example, the following quote isn't "fact," it's innuendo:

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

The remainder of your idiotic argument is just as threadbare and useless.

Now answer the question, degenerate.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

Once again, you FAIL -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 13 December, 2012 22:31, Blogger snug.bug said...

I presented nothing but facts, and no theories, and no innuendo.

You are delusional.

 
At 13 December, 2012 23:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Citing an insane sex predator as an authority isn't particularly convincing.

As usual, I cite direct quotes, while you lie, obfuscate, and cite yourself as an authority.

FAIL

You're delusional.

Care to substantiate your bullshit, liar?

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 Decemberber 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now answer the question, degenerate.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 08:45, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, your utter snow job only shows that you lie. Your verbosity disguises from lazy readers (such as SLC habituatees) the fact that those quotes do not say what you claim they say.

Then you add a glaze of ButtGale attitude to create an impression that you've got a serious point.

You're a liar GutterBall.

 
At 14 December, 2012 09:02, Blogger snug.bug said...

I have never put forth a conspiracy theory of homicidal elevator mechanics. GoiterButt's completely invented claim that I have seems to be calculated to try to discredit the facts that I have put forth:

The WTC towers had 15 miles of elevator shafts that gave convenient access in privacy to most of the core columns of the buildings.

The 9-month elevator renovations project made tenants comfortable with hearing construction noises going in in there.

The project provided cover for moving tons of construction material into and throughout the buildings.

There was plenty of opportunity to install concealed explosive and/or incendiary charges on or inside the hollow box columns from the elevator shafts.

The peculiar behaviour of the elevator mechanics could be explained by supposing that they had sensed peculiar activities going on in the shafts separate from their own operations whether they were evidenced by strange lights, odd noises, or signs (such as drill shavings or fireproofing patches) of work they did not do.

These are facts, not theories.

 
At 14 December, 2012 09:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...I have never put forth a conspiracy theory of homicidal elevator mechanics."

Really? No kidding? The links and the quotes I provide up-thread say otherwise, liar. For example,

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Again, we can see that your idiotic theory is nothing but innuendo and smear.

Shit for brains lies, "...The project provided cover for moving tons of construction material into and throughout the buildings."

For a lying asshole who claims to "never put forth a conspiracy theory of homicidal elevator mechanics," you're sure going out of your way to defend your homicidal elevator mechanic theory.

Do you always talk out of both sides of your mealy mouth, bullshitter?

Once again, you FAIL, liar.

Now answer the question, degenerate.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 09:56, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFool continues to make his straw dolls dance.

I didn't say anything about a thin coating of thermite. You are obviously so emotionally involved that you can't even read competently. Why is that?

Why can't you discuss the facts like a reasonable person? Why do have to leap to stupid conclusions? What is wrong with you?

 
At 14 December, 2012 10:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...I didn't say anything about a thin coating of thermite."

False. What's this, liar?

"...Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

You repeated a conspiracy theory, which makes YOU a conspiracy theorist. Not only did you parrot a conspiracy theory, YOU SPENT SEVERAL THREADS DEFENDING THAT CONSPIRACY THEORY.

Thus, anyone can see that you're a liar who talks out of both sides of his filthy, lying mouth. Did your mother, Janice the Enabler, teach you to lie with abandon, or did you inherit this wonderful personal quality from your so-called "father"?

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Now answer the question, worm.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 10:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

Incendiary materials could also have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying fireproofing.

Does your quote-mining have a point, other than to hijack the thread with your stinking ButtGale?

I never said that a thin layer of thermite could cut structural steel. However, Jonathan Cole has cut a substantial I-beam with jist two pounds of sulfur-enhanced thermite, as shown in this five-minute video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXlC2TlNgEU&list=UUCU5Ac7Vd7cqPk074nnKSTw&index=3

 
At 14 December, 2012 10:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...I never said that a thin layer of thermite could cut structural steel."

Another bald-faced lie, bullshitter? What's this, liar?

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

So what was the point of painting "incendiary coatings" on the structural steel if not to cut that same structural steel?

Talk out of both sides of your mouth much, bullshitter?

FAIL

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Now answer the question, worm.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 11:34, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 14 December, 2012 11:38, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, your quote-mining ignores the context of the discussion. I was debunking Ian's absurd "magic thermite elves" construct by pointing out that ordinary human elevator mechanics could potentially be fooled into spraying incendiaries they thought were ordinary building materials. I never said that incendiary paint could cut structural steel.

The point of applying incendiary coatings to the steel would obviously be to heat the steel. Any more questions? You can't possibly be as dumb as you pretend to be. You're just making a fool of yourself.

What truthers failed to cut a pipe with 40 pounds of thermite? Where, when? New Mexico Tech explosive experts failed to cut a column with 180 pounds of thermite, but obviously that was because they were paid to fail--as can be seen in the five-minute video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXlC2TlNgEU

 
At 14 December, 2012 11:40, Blogger snug.bug said...

You remind me of one of those bad guys in the Road Warrior movie, prancing around with your buttcheeks hanging out of your leather harness, beating your chest and shouting about what a tough guy you are.

 
At 14 December, 2012 11:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...your quote-mining ignores the context of the discussion. I was debunking Ian's absurd "magic thermite elves" construct by pointing out that ordinary human elevator mechanics could potentially be fooled into spraying incendiaries they thought were ordinary building materials."

You weren't "debunking" anything, liar. Ian's "'magic thermite elves' construct" is not Ian's theory -- you lying scum bag. It's a phrase he uses to mock your idiotic conspiracy drivel.

Nor have you EVER claimed the "incendiary coating" was intended to "heat the steel."

Here's what you wrote, liar:

"...There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers." -- -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

Obviously, you pulled that lie out of your ass in order to avoid answering my questions, liar. And you won't answer my questions because to do so will expose you as a deranged liar.

See? You're a liar who lies first, last and always. Same shit. different day.

Shit for brains lies, "...The point of applying incendiary coatings to the steel would obviously be to heat the steel."

Another bald-faced lie!

Then why did the troofers try and FAIL to cut a pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite if the goal of painting the structural steel was only to "heat the steel"?

Contradict yourself much, liar?

FAIL

So STONEWALL AGAIN, ASSHOLE. ANYTHING BUT "DEBATE" IN GOOD FAITH. RIGHT, YOU NEO-FASCIST LIAR?

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Now answer the question, worm.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 12:11, Blogger snug.bug said...

"Magic Thermite Elves" is Ian's construct, as is "Modified Attack Baboons". I debunked them. I'm sorry that's not clear to you, but it's not my fault.

I shouldn't have to claim that the purpose of an "incendiary coating" would be to "heat the steel" but sometimes I forget that I'm dealing with sub-normal intelligences here.

Please support your claim that truthers failed to cut a pipe with 40 pounds of thermite. Your repetition of unsupported claims makes you look dishonest or stupid or both.

Your silly question does not meet legal standards for permissibility in a court of law because it assumes facts not in evidence. I already explained that to you. You refuse to learn.

 
At 14 December, 2012 12:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 14 December, 2012 12:14, Blogger snug.bug said...

Also, you never answered about how does it feel to be conned by a janitor. I would think that if you had the education you claim, it would feel really really shitty--but maybe like the tough guy in Road Warrior you think that being reamed deeper and wider and for more hours just shows how tough you are?

 
At 14 December, 2012 12:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "..."Magic Thermite Elves" is Ian's construct, as is "Modified Attack Baboons". I debunked them. I'm sorry that's not clear to you, but it's not my fault."

False. Ian doesn't engage you in a serious manner. He considers you a joke, and therefore, he MOCKS YOU AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY. For example,

"...False. You've given thermite properties which it does not have, so it must be magic at work." -- Ian, 27 December 2010.

There was nothing to "debunk." He was mocking you, jackass. Thus, we can see, once again, that you're a liar.

FAIL

Shit for brains lies, "...I shouldn't have to claim that the purpose of an "incendiary coating" would be to "heat the steel" but sometimes I forget that I'm dealing with sub-normal intelligences here."

I gave you a direct quote from your own drivel. You used the word "explosive," liar.

So tell us, how would a thin coat of thermite damage or weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel? The answer is simple: It can't damage or weaken SS. That's like trying to tell me that you can cut structural steel with a sparkler -- you pseudo-science spewing cretin.

FAIL

Shit for brains lies, "...Please support your claim that truthers failed to cut a pipe with 40 pounds of thermite."

Lying again, jackass? Or trying to change the subject by throwing up another red herring as flack?

It was called "Truth Burn," liar.

If 40 pounds of thermite isn't going to take down something made of 10" by 10" hollow metal tubing, I dare say you're homicidal elevator mechanics and "incendiary coating" theory is pile of crap.

Any more lies for us, jackass?

The remainder of your argument is a pile of blowhard bullshit and doesn't deserve a response.

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Now answer the question, worm.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

FAIL

 
At 14 December, 2012 12:55, Blogger snug.bug said...

I've debunked Ian's STOOOOPID mockery, showing it has nothing to do with reality. I'm sorry you're not bright enough to see that.

I used the word "explosives" in the phrase "explosive or incendiary devices" and distinguished them from incendiaries and from coatings. Do you have a point other than to try to give the false impression that you have one?

I never said a thin coat of thermite could cut structural steel.

You're beating up a phantom doll of your own creation. And you never answered about how does it feel to be conned by a janitor.






 
At 14 December, 2012 13:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains whines, "...I've debunked Ian's STOOOOPID mockery, showing it has nothing to do with reality. I'm sorry you're not bright enough to see that."

Oh, I see. Now Ian's words are mockery, just as I said. You can't "debunk" mockery -- you 'tard. There's nothing to "debunk" -- you idiot.

Mockery n. pl. An absurd misrepresentation or imitation of something.

There never was anything to "debunk," liar. I'm sorry the definition of words are so elusive for a cretin of your ilk, but your argument simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny, cretin.

See? You're a liar who can't be trusted to tell the truth.

FAIL

So why did you lie about "Truth Burn"? You know damned well that 40 lbs. of thermite FAILED to cut 10" hollow tubes.

So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

And you didn't answer my questions, liar.

So tell us, how would a thin coat of thermite damage or weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel? Are you trying to tell us that the equivalent of a sparkler can cut structural steel? Heating the steel with such a small amount of thermite won't do you any good. So what's the point of your idiotic argument, cretin?

As always, you're talking out of both sides of your mealy mouth.

Conflicted much, liar?

FAIL

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Now answer the question, worm.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 13:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

I can debunk mockery, showing it to be a sham based on false assumptions and lies.

You, since you don't know the difference between bunk and debunking, can't debunk anything.

I never said a thin coating of thermite damaged or weakened structural steel, and I already told you the point of my argument--it was to debunk Ian's ludicrous "Magic Thermite Elves" construct. Playing dumb is what you're best at.

Jonathan Cole cut a substantial I-beam with 2 pounds of thermite.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXlC2TlNgEU


 
At 14 December, 2012 14:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...I can debunk mockery, showing it to be a sham based on false assumptions and lies...You, since you don't know the difference between bunk and debunking, can't debunk anything."

You didn't "debunk" anything. As the quotes I provide PROVE, you're a conspiracy theorist. Conspiracy theorists aren't "debunkers" -- you pervert. Conspiracy theorists are advocates for their 100% fact-free, delusional belief system.

See? You're a liar who can't be trusted to tell the truth.

FAIL

Shit for brains lies, "...I never said a thin coating of thermite damaged or weakened structural steel, and I already told you the point of my argument--it was to debunk Ian's ludicrous "Magic Thermite Elves" construct. Playing dumb is what you're best at."

You haven't proven that you "debunked" anything, liar. Citing a compulsive liar, such as yourself, as an authority isn't proof of anything.

You were advocating your homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy theory as the quotes I provide up thread prove beyond a doubt. You didn't "debunk" anything.

Again, we can see that you're a liar who cites himself as an authority while you steadfastly refuse to substantiate your idiotic and thoroughly dishonest argument.

FAIL

Shit for brains lies, "...Jonathan Cole cut a substantial I-beam with 2 pounds of thermite."

Your idiotic Jonathon Cole video doesn't explain why you lied about the outcome of "Truth Burn." You know damned well that "Truth Burn" was a resounding FAILURE. The thermite was unable to cut the 10" pipes.

So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

FAIL.

So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Now answer the question, worm.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 14:20, Blogger snug.bug said...

Utterfail, your inability to distinguish fact from theory goes a long way to explain why you are so confused about 9/11 and so frustrated in your attempts to communicate.

Your inability to distinguish square tubing from pipe is another cause of your communications frustration.

Your inability to process a simple declarative "I did not say bla bla bla" is another cause of your communications frustration.

I'm sorry about your cognitive incompetence but it's not my fault.

 
At 14 December, 2012 14:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I didn't fail anything, liar. All you've managed to do is cite yourself, a proven compulsive liar, as an authority. Your alleged "simple declarative" doesn't prove a goddamned thing.

You're not a "debunker," you're a conspiracy theorist. And you've hijacked at least two threads in order to defend your idiotic homicidal elevator mechanic theory.

You can lie and obfuscate until you're blue in the face, asshole, but the fact remains that the quotes I provide support my argument and bring the lie to your never-ending stream of lies and distortions.

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Continued...

 
At 14 December, 2012 14:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

 
At 14 December, 2012 14:46, Blogger snug.bug said...

You continue to repeat the same stoooopid lie in claiming that I have a homicidal elevator mechanic theory. Your interpretation of the quotes is incompetent, as anyone can see. It's surely no secret to you that you have poor reading comprehension--I doubt any of your educators ever misled you about that--so for you to post here as if you have normal cognitive functioning is very dishonest.

I didn't lie about Truth Burn. You asked about cutting pipe. Square tubing is not pipe.

 
At 14 December, 2012 14:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

Go play with your guitar, NOP Wonder. Maybe if you work some of the flab off those sausage fingers you might be able to halfway play the thing.

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...You continue to repeat the same stoooopid lie in claiming that I have a homicidal elevator mechanic theory."

No, you continue to repeat the same lies, asshole. The quotes I provide up-thread prove beyond a doubt that you hijacked at least two threads in order to advocate your homicidal elevator mechanic theory.

AGAIN -- YOU FUCKING RETARD -- DIRECT QUOTES AREN'T LIES.


FAIL

Shit for brains lies, "...I didn't lie about Truth Burn. You asked about cutting pipe. Square tubing is not pipe"

Whether the pipe is square or round is wholly IRRELEVANT. You said--and I quote: "...Please support your claim that truthers failed to cut a pipe with 40 pounds of thermite. Your repetition of unsupported claims makes you look dishonest or stupid or both."

And I did support my claim with the link to the Truth Burn" blog.

You lied and tossed out flack when you asked my to "support [my] claim." After all, YOU KNOW GODDAMNED WELL THAT "TRUTH BURN" WAS A RESOUNDING FAILURE -- YOU DEGENERATE LIAR.

You'll do anything to dance around my questions because you know that your entire argument is based on lies, smears and innuendo.

FAIL

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:45, Blogger snug.bug said...

I don't have a homicidal elevator mechanic theory, UtterFool. That's a figment of your blighted imagination.

Square tubing is not pipe, fool. I didn't lie about anything. Lay off the red bull--it's not good for your mental health.

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:45, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, and how does it feel to be conned by a janitor, genius?

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still spamming the thread with lies and 100% fact-free bullshit, liar?

You didn't "debunk" anything, nor did you manage to "con" anyone. All you managed to do is make yourself look like an ass.

Why is it that you can never substantiate your assertions by any other method than citing yourself as an authority?

After all, you have no "authority," because you're a proven compulsive liar.

Now deny the existence of the direct quotes which prove you're a liar, liar.

Continued..

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:54, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Continued...

 
At 14 December, 2012 15:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 16:04, Blogger snug.bug said...

If I'm not an authority on my own statements, then who is? Certainly not you.

You'd better check and see if the syphilis you denied you had back in the 70s has entered the tertiary stage.

 
At 14 December, 2012 16:32, Blogger GuitarBill said...

No, you're not an authority on your own statements, because you're a proven compulsive liar and charlatan with no intellectual integrity whatsoever. Your statements support my argument and prove you're lying. They also prove your entire argument is premised on lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FACT: You hijacked two threads in order to defend your idiotic homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy theory. Thus, you are a conspiracy theorist.

FACT: You have NEVER PROVEN that alleged "incendiary coatings" can cut or significantly weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel. This is pure pseudo-science, smear and innuendo.

FACT: You have NEVER established a solid connection between the presence of the elevator mechanics on 9/11 "and a lot of civilians [who] died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." This is pure smear and innuendo.

FACT: You contradict yourself when you claim "there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11," and then in the next breath claim--and I quote: "If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day." So which is it, liar? Were the elevator mechanics on the WTC site on 9/11 or not? You can't have it both ways, liar.

FACT: You have never proven that the elevator mechanics left the WTC. They may have been ordered to leave the site BY RESCUE personnel. In any case, all we have is your word, and the word of a proven compulsive liar is worthless.

FACT: Your claim, which reads -- and I quote: "...Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating" is not an established "fact," it's speculation unsupported by evidence. Thus, this claim is pure smear and innuendo.

Thus, your argument is exposed as a pile of unsupported, contradictory crap, which is premised on lies, distortions, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL.

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 16:40, Blogger snug.bug said...

Are you done dancing your straw butterflies around?

I have connected the elevator mechanics to the civilians who died in the elevators. Read the USA Today article, idiot!

There's no contradiction at all, liar. The elevator mechanics were there at the WTC, and then they left so they were absent at the WTC. You are a simple-minded boob.

USA Today says they left the WTC.

If you deny that charges can be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating, you'll have to prove it can't be done. Common sense says it can.

Your demands for proof are silly when NIST doesn't prove its case.

Oh, and how does it feel to be conned by the lying janitor, Willie Fraudriguez, genius? You two jowly fat-asses are two peas in a pod.



 
At 14 December, 2012 16:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...USA Today says they left the WTC."

Which proves absolutely nothing. Assuming the USA Today article says what you claim (and it likely doesn't), you have never established that the elevator mechanics left under mysterious circumstances -- which, in any case, proves nothing -- nor have you proven that they weren't ordered to evacuate the site by rescue personnel (e.g., FDNY). All you have is speculation. Thus, your argument is based on smear tactics and innuendo.

Shit for brains lies, "...If you deny that charges can be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating, you'll have to prove it can't be done. Common sense says it can."

It's not incumbent on me to prove your idiotic conspiracy theories, that burden rests on your shoulders and your shoulders alone, cretin. I'm not denying charges can be concealed -- you illiterate cretin -- I'm saying YOU HAVEN'T PROVEN ANYTHING WAS CONCEALED. Thus, once again, your argument is based on smear tactics and innuendo.

Shit for brains lies, "...Your demands for proof are silly when NIST doesn't prove its case."

No one cares if a failed janitor, sex predator and compulsive liar believes the NIST Report or not. Your beliefs are irrelevant. If you believe the NIST Report is in error, the burden of proof, once again, rests entirely on your shoulders. And so far, you've utterly failed to prove your conspiracy theory or prove the NIST Report is in error. After all, smear tactics, distortions, lies and innuendo aren't proof of anything other than your bottomless dishonesty.

FAIL

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

Look at you stamping your silly little pig feet, your jowls and your butt-cheeks shaking with rage!

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yawn.

Would you care to respond to anything I've written, or would you prefer to squeal like a recalcitrant child and spam the blog with your impotent, whining nonsense?

FAIL.

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:11, Blogger snug.bug said...

You're so silly! It must be humiliating to recognize that you were gulled by a con artist who was a janitor! How can you face yourself in the mirror? Or don't you? Did you quit shaving?

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

I responded to the drivel you wrote, and you only repeated it and augmented it.

You're not interested in truth, just in quote-mining so you can try to play "gotcha" cause I've kicked your ass so pulpy that my boot gets stuck in the goo.

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You couldn't "gull" your way out of a wet paper bag, lightweight. And the only "ass" you managed to kick is your own. We know this because you refuse to respond to my comment at time stamp 14 December, 2012 16:56? On the other hand, you are a con artist. A shitty, incompetent con artist, but a con artist nonetheless.

Let's try again, ass face.

Shit for brains lies, "...USA Today says they left the WTC."

Which proves absolutely nothing. Assuming the USA Today article says what you claim (and it likely doesn't), you have never established that the elevator mechanics left under mysterious circumstances -- which, in any case, proves nothing -- nor have you proven that they weren't ordered to evacuate the site by rescue personnel (e.g., FDNY). All you have is speculation. Thus, your argument is based on smear tactics and innuendo.

Shit for brains lies, "...If you deny that charges can be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating, you'll have to prove it can't be done. Common sense says it can."

It's not incumbent on me to prove your idiotic conspiracy theories, that burden rests on your shoulders and your shoulders alone, cretin. I'm not denying charges can be concealed -- you illiterate cretin -- I'm saying YOU HAVEN'T PROVEN ANYTHING WAS CONCEALED. Thus, once again, your argument is based on smear tactics and innuendo.

Shit for brains lies, "...Your demands for proof are silly when NIST doesn't prove its case."

No one cares if a failed janitor, sex predator and compulsive liar believes the NIST Report or not. Your beliefs are irrelevant. If you believe the NIST Report is in error, the burden of proof, once again, rests entirely on your shoulders. And so far, you've utterly failed to prove your conspiracy theory or prove the NIST Report is in error. After all, smear tactics, distortions, lies and innuendo aren't proof of anything other than your bottomless dishonesty.

FAIL

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So where's your proof that incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Up your unwashed ass, I assume?

Where's your proof that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Up your unwashed ass, I assume?

Go for it, clown. And this time, try to present something other than smears and innuendo.

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 17:35, Blogger snug.bug said...

I didn't lie about Truth Burn. Some fool claimed that truthers had been unable to cut 10" pipe with thermite. I never heard of anyone trying to cut 10" pipe with thermite, so I asked when that happened. Why would I think of Truth Burn? They didn't have any 10" pipe.

Your demands for proof are silly when NIST doesn't prove their case.

Your intellect is defective, child. This can't be a secret to you.

 
At 14 December, 2012 18:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...I didn't lie about Truth Burn. Some fool claimed that truthers had been unable to cut 10" pipe with thermite...[blah][blah][blah]."

Whether the pipe is square or round is wholly IRRELEVANT. You said--and I quote: "Please support your claim that truthers failed to cut a pipe with 40 pounds of thermite. Your repetition of unsupported claims makes you look dishonest or stupid or both."

And I did support my claim with the link to the "Truth Burn" blog.

You lied and tossed out flack when you asked me to "support [my] claim." After all, YOU KNOW GODDAMNED WELL THAT "TRUTH BURN" WAS A RESOUNDING FAILURE -- YOU DEGENERATE LIAR.

So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

FAIL.

Shit for brains lies, "...Your demands for proof are silly when NIST doesn't prove their case."

That's right, goat fucker, when your back is against the wall, CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

No one cares if a college dropout, sex predator and unemployed janitor believes the NIST Report or not. Your idiotic opinion is less than worthless, nor is it relevant.

So, I'll ask you again -- you STONEWALLING LIAR:

Where's your proof that incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's your proof that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

FACT: You don't have a shred of evidence to support your argument. All you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

And lies, smear tactics and innuendo aren't evidence, it's DECEIT.

Once again, you FAIL, -- you neo-facsist worm.

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 18:16, Blogger snug.bug said...

Square steel tubing is not pipe, Asshole. You said I was lying simply because I could not identify the incident to which you were incompetently referring.

You're a lying fool, and your demands for proof of something that hasn't even been properly investigated yet are dishonest and silly.

 
At 14 December, 2012 18:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...Square steel tubing is not pipe, Asshole. You said I was lying simply because I could not identify the incident to which you were incompetently referring."

Lying again, asshole? You LIED ABOUT "TRUTH BURN." You tried to pretend that the event NEVER OCCURRED and demanded that I present evidence for an event that YOU know damned well occurred. You are well aware that "Truth Burn" was a resounding failure, asshole.

SO WHY DID YOU LIE ABOUT "TRUTH BURN"?

Shit for brains lies, "...You're a lying fool, and your demands for proof of something that hasn't even been properly investigated yet are dishonest and silly."

You have never proven the NIST Report is in error. All you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

Now answer the goddamned questions, asshole liar:

Where's your proof that incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's your proof that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

YOU WON'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS BECAUSE YOU KNOW DAMNED WELL THAT ALL YOU HAVE ARE SMEAR TACTICS, LIES AND INNUENDO.

Once again, you FAIL, asshole.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 18:31, Blogger snug.bug said...

I did not recognize the event from your inept description of it. I didn't try to pretend anything. You, with your repeated prolix-spam that nobody's going to read, is the one who pretends.

There is no such thing as square pipe, fool.

Your ignorance about practical things goes a long way to explain how you got gulled by a lying janitor, UtterFool.

 
At 14 December, 2012 18:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I didn't say there was a square pipe, you lying jackass. And whether the steel is square or round makes NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER. The experiment FAILED -- you lying jackass. YOU KNOW GODDAMNED WELL THAT "TRUTH BURN" FAILED. Thus, you were lying and throwing out flack in order to MISDIRECT THE "DEBATE."

Now answer the goddamned questions, asshole liar:

Where's your proof that incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's your proof that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Now answer the questions -- you depraved, STONEWALLING WORM:

Question: So why did you lie about "Truth Burn," liar?

Question: So tell us -- you pseudo-science spewing liar -- how does a thin coat of thermite manage to cut structural steel? After all, the "truthers" tried to cut a hollow pipe with 40 lbs. of thermite AND FAILED TO CUT THE PIPE.

Question: Would YOU care to provide proof to support your homicidal elevator mechanic theory as opposed to your CONSTANT STREAM OF 100% FACT-FREE INNUENDO AND OUTRIGHT SMEARS?

YOU WON'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS BECAUSE YOU KNOW DAMNED WELL THAT ALL YOU HAVE ARE SMEAR TACTICS, LIES AND INNUENDO.

Once again, you FAIL, asshole.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 19:08, Blogger snug.bug said...

10" square tubing is not pipe, fool.

You just lie and lie and lie in a futile attempt to look like you're right about something.

 
At 14 December, 2012 19:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 14 December, 2012 19:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 14 December, 2012 19:18, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions.

Where's your proof that incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's your proof that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Where's your proof to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel?

NOW STOP CHANGING THE SUBJECT AND ANSWER THE GODDAMNED QUESTIONS!

YOU WON'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS BECAUSE YOU KNOW DAMNED WELL THAT ALL YOU HAVE ARE SMEAR TACTICS, LIES AND INNUENDO -- YOU WORTHLESS, LYING CRETIN.

Once again, you FAIL -- you neo-fascist liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 14 December, 2012 20:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yo goat fucker! I don't see any evidence to support your assertions, ass. Why is that, liar?

All I hear are

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

See? You have nothing but lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 08:33, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 15 December, 2012 08:34, Blogger snug.bug said...

Friday night, and GoiterButt is sitting by the computer waiting for somebody to post something. Business is slow for your Wayne Newton tribute act, eh?

The USA Today articles (two of them) incriminate the elevator mechanics.

I didn't lie about anything. You lie enough for ten posters.

When the government does not provide proof that they're right, you have no business demanding proof that they're wrong. Why are you afraid of having thorough, honest, complete investigations?

 
At 15 December, 2012 10:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...The USA Today articles (two of them) incriminate the elevator mechanics."

Bullshit.

All you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo. And all you can do is cite yourself as an authority.

FAIL

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 11:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Now answer the questions, liar:-

Where's your proof that incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's your proof that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Where's your proof to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel?

You won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 11:21, Blogger snug.bug said...

Your willful blindness is noted. A curious person might simply google ... Elevator 9/11 USA Today ... but it's impossible to wake up a man who is pretending to be asleep.

When NIST does not prove its case, your continued demands for proofs from me are not justified. Why don't you ask NIST for proof, Mr. Differing Standards?

I never said incendiary coatings could cut structural steel columns.

Your obsessive and repetitive and compulsive lying is becoming quite tiresome.

 
At 15 December, 2012 12:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I can "google" [SIC] just fine, idiot. I can also see that you're STONEWALLING because you're completely unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel?

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 12:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

What I can't support is the stoooopid straw man arguments you dishonestly attribute to me.

I can support my arguments just fine. I don't make them if I can't support them. Where I run into trouble is that you guys lack the intellectual acuity to distinguish between asserting that the elevator shafts provided access to the hollow core columns of the building (that's a fact) and asserting that homicidal elevator mechanics blew up the twin towers (that's YOUR fantasy, not mine).

For you to repeat the same stoooopid questions that I've already answered as if I hadn't is dishonest--and it makes you look dumb, and it shows the desperate lengths to which you must go to pretend you have an argument.

 
At 15 December, 2012 12:25, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Making empty accusations like "straw man" without providing evidence to support your assertion isn't "debate," asshole, it's DECEIT.

Obviously you're STONEWALLING because you're completely unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics?

Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers?

Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel?

It's becoming increasingly clear that you don't a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 12:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

They're not my assertions. They're your inventions. Your demands that I support your inventions are absurd and dishonest.

You're just trying to spray your ButtGale all over the place because you're pissed at me that I've made such a complete fool out of you time and time and time again.

Also, your support of the blatant con artist Willie Rodriguez has totally humiliated you.

You're operating in total meltdown mode, and discrediting your cause and yourself.

 
At 15 December, 2012 12:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still lying, asshole? Making an empty accusation based on obvious lies like "[t]hey're your inventions," without providing evidence to support your assertion, isn't "debate," it's DECEIT.

As anyone can see, you're STONEWALLING because you're completely unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 12:54, Blogger snug.bug said...

You just continue to spam the same nonsensical wallpaper over and over in a desperate attempt to pretend you have a point.

And if you do so long enough, Ian will come by and claim that you have humiliated me and that I believe in invisible widows and attack baboons--and you will feel vindicated.

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:05, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The quotes and the links to your verbaige, which I reproduced up-thread for everyone to read, prove that you're lying. As the links prove, you hijacked at least two threads with your idiotic homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy theory. As the quotes I provide prove, you also defended your homicidal elevator mechanic theory.

I'll happily post your comments again in order to prove you're lying, if you'd like.

Your continued refusal to answer legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now lie to me again, asshole.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:13, Blogger snug.bug said...

My alleged verbiage that you (allegedly) quoted does not say anything about a homicidal elevator mechanic theory, GutterBall.

You just continue to spam the same nonsensical wallpaper over and over in a desperate attempt to pretend you have a point.

And if you do so long enough, Ian will come by and claim that you have humiliated me and that I believe in invisible widows and attack baboons--and you will feel vindicated.

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:19, Blogger snug.bug said...

When you have to rely on the likes of Ian for support for your irrational assertions, you're in deep, deep kimchee, NOP Wonder of Silicon Gutter.

How come you (with your claimed degree in applied mathematics) couldn't figure out that if less than 1% of the 15,000 office workers under the impact zone died, then Willie's claims that he saved hundreds are a bald-faced lie?

I can't answer when you ask me why I did something I didn't do. I'm sorry you find this frustrating. Maybe you should save up for a new X-Box and leave the thinking to the grown-ups. Do you imagine that your gaseous emissions improve with repetition?




 
At 15 December, 2012 13:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Lying and STONEWALLING again, asshole? As anyone with an IQ in excess of the temperature of warm spit can see, the questions I posed follow naturally from your verbiage, which I reproduced up-thread. That we decided to label your idiotic theory "homicidal elevator mechanic theory" is IRRELEVANT. You proposed and defended the theory on at least TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS. As the links I provide prove beyond a doubt, you hijacked at least two threads in order to defend your idiotic conspiracy theory. To claim otherwise is a bald-faced lie.

Your deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:30, Blogger snug.bug said...

I never proposed that the elevator mechanics deliberately blew up the WTC, UtterFool.

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Read it again, moron: That we decided to label your idiotic theory "homicidal elevator mechanic theory" is IRRELEVANT. You proposed and defended the theory on at least TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS. As the links I provide prove beyond a doubt, you hijacked at least two threads in order to defend your idiotic conspiracy theory. To claim otherwise is a bald-faced lie.

You can lie until you're blue in the face, liar, but the links and the verbiage I provide up-thread proves BEYOND A DOUBT that my questions are PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 15 December, 2012 13:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now lie again, asshole.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 14:27, Blogger snug.bug said...

You keep plastering on the same bullshit wallpaper, UtterFool.

 
At 15 December, 2012 15:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Lying again, bullshitter? You didn't propose your homicidal elevator mechanic theory in order to debunk anything.

The 8th post to the thread was made by Ian--and I quote:

"...But what about magic thermite elves? So far, only Steven Jones has taken a stab at explaining that, and he failed miserably." -- Ian, 27 December 2010.

Your reply (post number 10) to Ian follows:

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010

As anyone can see, you weren't attempting to "debunk" anything. You were responding with your compulsory provocative off-topic non sequitur, which you CONSTANTLY use to hijack EVERY thread posted to SLC.

Thus, your a liar.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 15:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

You keep posting the same nonsense again and again and again--like some crackhead college kid submitting the same failing paper again and again and again in the delusional belief that somebody's just not getting it.

 
At 15 December, 2012 15:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And you keep STONEWALLING AND LYING.

Do you honestly think you fool anyone other than yourself, felcher? Well, if nothing else, you've done a wonderful job of exposing your depravity and intellectual dishonesty.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 15 December, 2012 15:56, Blogger Ian said...

It's good to see that Brian is still squealing hysterically because he's been duped by a fraud and con artist like Richard Gage.

Cheer up, Brian, You're not the first pathetic fool to be swindled by someone like Gage, and you won't be the last. In the future, just be more vigilant about the kinds of people you put your trust in.

 
At 15 December, 2012 15:57, Blogger Ian said...

You keep posting the same nonsense again and again and again--like some crackhead college kid submitting the same failing paper again and again and again in the delusional belief that somebody's just not getting it.

This is hilarious coming from the guy who has been babbling about invisible widows with "questions" for almost 4 years on this blog, in spite of all the ridicule he receives here for it.

 
At 15 December, 2012 16:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

GoiterButt, your questions are not legally permissible in a court of law because they assume facts not in evidence.

Here's a hint should you ever decide to go back and complete your AA degree: your papers will get better grades if your quotes support your points.

 
At 15 December, 2012 17:36, Blogger Ian said...

I see Brian has not responded to my points. That's typical, since I humiliated him. Willie Rodriguez and Craig Ranke humiliated Brian too, which is why he ran away squealing and crying from both.

 
At 15 December, 2012 17:38, Blogger snug.bug said...

You're a liar, Ian. Craig and Willie are liars, and GoiterButt is a liar.

 
At 15 December, 2012 20:27, Blogger Ian said...

You're a liar, Ian. Craig and Willie are liars, and GoiterButt is a liar.

Poor Brian. He's hysterical because he knows that there will never be a new investigation, the widows will never have their questions answered, and "meatball on a fork" will never be published in a journal.

Brian is also hysterical because he knows that Willie Rodriguez is a hero, while Brian Good is a mentally ill unemployed janitor who wears women's underwear and has the worst haircut this side of Donald Trump.

Brian is also hysterical because I've humiliated him on a daily basis for the last 4 years, reminding him that while he's a burnt-out failure who lives with his parents at age 60, I'm smart and successful and have accomplished much more than he ever could, even though I'm half his age.

 
At 15 December, 2012 20:32, Blogger Ian said...

Let's also not forget that Brian himself told us that there are no widows, which just demonstrates his depraved irrationality.

Also, Brian was banned from 9/11 Truth, because the truth movement is not interested in failed janitors who wear women's underwear. They want serious researchers and acclaimed academics like Jim Fetzer, Bill Deagle, and Kevin Barrett.

 
At 15 December, 2012 23:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So, goat fucker, I see you still can't support your idiotic homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy theory with anything other than lies, smears and innuendo. Why is that, liar?

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 15 December, 2012 23:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Continued...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now lie to us again, scumbag!


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 00:54, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Does anyone else see the absurdity of "debate" with Brian "drag queen for 9/11 troof" Good? It's like something out of a Monty Python movie.

E.g.,

GOAT FUCKER: Come on then.

GUITARBILL: What?

GOAT FUCKER: Have at you!

GUITARBILL: You are indeed stupid, goat fucker, but the fight is mine.

GOAT FUCKER: Oh, had enough, eh?

GUITARBILL: Look--you stupid bastard--you've got no arms left.

GOAT FUCKER: Yes I have.

GUITARBILL: Look!

GOAT FUCKER: Just a flesh wound.

GUITARBILL: Look, stop that.

GOAT FUCKER: Chicken! Chicken!

GUITARBILL: Look, I'll have your leg. Right!

[Whop! Off with the goat fucker's leg]

GOAT FUCKER: Right, I'll do you for that!

GUITARBILL: You'll what?

GOAT FUCKER: Come 'ere!

GUITARBILL: What are you going to do, bleed on me?

GOAT FUCKER: I'm invincible!

GUITARBILL: You're a loony.

GOAT FUCKER: The Goat Fucker always triumphs! Have at you! Come on then.

[whop]

[GUITARBILL chops the GOAT FUCKER's other leg off]

GOAT FUCKER: All right; we'll call it a draw.

GUITARBILL: Come, Patsy.

GOAT FUCKER: Oh, oh, I see, running away, 'eh?...You yellow bastards! Come back here and take what's coming to you...I'll bite your legs off!

**********

Absurd!

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 09:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

It's kind of a tribute, actually, that Ian would sacrifice his Saturday Night in NYC to libel someone he doesn't even know. Ian, can you prove even one of the claims you made about me?

I didn't run away from Wizzie Liedrugas. Here I am. Here he is not. Years ago I challenged him to a debate and he didn't have the guts. Then just to try to show me up he challenged me to one--while he employed a human shield and the "moderators" of the debate demonstrated that they were as much out to get the human shield as they were to get me. That was unacceptable. I tried to find a neutral venue, and Wizzie would not lift a finger to help. I have debated Wizzie (I call him Wizzie because he Wizzes on the graves of dead heroes whose glory he stole) right here and I have kicked his fat jiggly ass into a pulp. His story is a lie. He can't deny it, and he doesn't evwen try.



UtterFail, your continued irrational demands are making you look not just stupid, but obsessed.

 
At 16 December, 2012 09:42, Blogger Ian said...

It's kind of a tribute, actually, that Ian would sacrifice his Saturday Night in NYC to libel someone he doesn't even know. Ian, can you prove even one of the claims you made about me?

Who says I sacrificed my Saturday night? You live in a fantasy world.

And yes, I can prove the claims.

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2012/11/is-truther-becoming-ultimate-insult.html

Look at your comment on November 8th at 7:18. You said "there are no widows", which just demonstrates your depraved irrationality.

I didn't run away from Wizzie Liedrugas. Here I am. Here he is not. Years ago I challenged him to a debate and he didn't have the guts. Then just to try to show me up he challenged me to one--while he employed a human shield and the "moderators" of the debate demonstrated that they were as much out to get the human shield as they were to get me. That was unacceptable. I tried to find a neutral venue, and Wizzie would not lift a finger to help. I have debated Wizzie (I call him Wizzie because he Wizzes on the graves of dead heroes whose glory he stole) right here and I have kicked his fat jiggly ass into a pulp. His story is a lie. He can't deny it, and he doesn't evwen try.

False.

 
At 16 December, 2012 09:53, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you're a liar. I didn't say there are no widows. You, however, expressed great glee about their continued frustration in their quest for answers.

You can't prove your libelous claims.

Where's old Jiggle-cheeks, anyway? Still hiding out in South America?

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian "lying homosexual for 9/.11 troof" Good lies, "...You can't prove your libelous claims."

Project much, cocksucker?

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL



**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:24, Blogger snug.bug said...

Far from legitimate, your questions are not permissible in a court of law because they assume facts not in evidence.

All you can do is spam the same dishonest questions.

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:27, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, and how does it feel to be scammed by a janitor, GoiterButt?

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

All you managed to prove is that you'll continue to lie when the evidence against you stares you straight in the face. That's why I refer to you as a depraved degenerate.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now lie to us again, degenerate.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:41, Blogger snug.bug said...

Look at UtterFail--see his buttcheeks and his jowls jiggle as he stamps his little feet in rage!

Most of his questions are dishonestly framed and unanswerable, and the ones that are not I have already answered, but he's blinder by the blood squirting out his eyeballs, so he can't read. All he can do is cut and paste the same spambulous crap.

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

There's no rage on my part, asshole. I'm just hitting you with the truth and proving to everyone that you'll lie even when the truth stares you straight in your ferret face.

In fact, you're the one who's simmering in a homosexual rage. That's why you lord over the SLC comment section while you continue to lie and STONEWALL.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now lie to us again, felcher.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 10:59, Blogger snug.bug said...

I can't lie to you again because I didn't lie in the first place.

You seem to have some problems with basic logic. Have you considered taking a junior college course? It would improve your life, and then maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood (and just plain wrong)so much.

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still lying while the evidence stares you straight in the face, liar?

I have a college education, and I can prove it. You, on the other hand, are an Internet blowhard who knows nothing about physical science. That's why you never heard of ΔT or The Ideal Gas Law until I introduced to concepts to you, Mr. bugus "scientific reputation." Watching a couple of YouTube videos about "9/11 conspiracy" doesn't qualify anyone as a fully qualified scientist or engineer -- you cretin. Face it, you're an Internet blowhard.

You're nothing but a blowhard and a compulsive liar.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, lie to us again while the evidence against you stares you straight in your ferret face, liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:21, Blogger snug.bug said...

You sure don't act like you have a college education, UtterFool. Educated people normally try to avoid making reckless and foolish claims (unless they're mentally ill, which appears to be the case for you). Your belief that there's some mystery to a trivial concept like ΔT betrays a lukewarm intelligence. You only fool those who want to be fooled.

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:23, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you're a liar. I didn't say there are no widows. You, however, expressed great glee about their continued frustration in their quest for answers.

False. It's right there in the like provided. You said "there are no widows".

You can't prove your libelous claims.

False.

Where's old Jiggle-cheeks, anyway? Still hiding out in South America?

Nobody cares about your homosexual obsession with 9/11 hero Willie Rodriguez.

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:27, Blogger GuitarBill said...

More of your impotent lies and bullshit, liar?

You don't know fuck all about how a person with a college education will behave. And the only person who makes "reckless and foolish claims" can be found between your chair and your keyboard, liar.

You're a compulsive liar who will continue to lie while the evidence stares you straight in your ferret face.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:29, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, tell us more about "reckless and foolish claims," liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 11:30, Blogger snug.bug said...

Lyin' Ian, you think you're funny when you take quotes out of context. What I said was:

"You guys let Ian speak for you, squealing 'Look at that bunch of silly mini-nukers and Jew-haters! There are no questions! There are no widows! Brian dresses funny! I have a Master's Degree! I'm clever as clever!'"

Learn to read, child.

 
At 16 December, 2012 12:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still STONEWALLING AND LYING, GAY BOI?

Should we expect less from a brain-dead college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert? Probably not.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 12:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, tell us more about "reckless and foolish claims," liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 12:22, Blogger snug.bug said...

UtterFail, what is your evidence for the libelous claims that I am a college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert?

Let's see your proof. Or admit that you lied.

 
At 16 December, 2012 12:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, and how does it feel to be scammed by the con artist, Willie Rodriguez?

 
At 16 December, 2012 12:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Shit for brains lies, "...what is your evidence for the libelous claims that I am a college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert?

Trying to shift the burden of proof with another red herring, cretin? Well, it won't work, jackass.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 12:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, tell us more about "reckless and foolish claims," you lying, cheesy electric donkey bottom biter.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!


 
At 16 December, 2012 13:07, Blogger snug.bug said...

IOW you have no evidence to support your libelous claims that I am a college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert.

Hiding behind your fake internet name, you feel free to lie about people you don't even know.

Poor NOP Wonder, the UtterFail never-was of Silicon Gutter.

 
At 16 December, 2012 13:08, Blogger snug.bug said...



Oh, and how does it feel to be scammed by a janitor, GoiterButt?

 
At 16 December, 2012 13:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Another red herring, which you use to shift the burden of proof, jackass?

Your attempts to change the subject are as transparent as the air between your ears, jackass.

Besides, you've already proven that you're a college dropout. So there's no need to respond to your red herring or beat a dead horse.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 13:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, tell us more about "reckless and foolish claims," you lying, cheesy electric donkey bottom biter.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 13:51, Blogger snug.bug said...

You have very subjective ideas of proof, ButtGirl of Silicon Gutter.
You're a joke.

You blast the place with spam to try to hide the fact that you can't support your claims, and to try to fool the lazy slow readers who will suppose that if you print enough characters that you must be supporting your points.

 
At 16 December, 2012 14:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

My claims are supported, liar. And the quotes and links I provide prove I'm telling the truth. You, on the other hand, are such a depraved liar that you'll continue to lie even while the evidence against you stares you straight in your ferret face.

See? You're a liar and a degenerate.

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 14:05, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, tell us more about "reckless and foolish claims," you lying, cheesy electric donkey bottom biter.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!


 
At 16 December, 2012 14:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 16 December, 2012 14:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

Your claims are not only unsupported, most of them are contrary to reality. Your droopy unsupported ButtGirl cheeks are jiggling around your knees, liar.

 
At 16 December, 2012 15:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still spamming the thread with lies, fuck face?

As usual, I supply direct links and citations, which prove I'm telling the truth, and you cite yourself as an authority while you lie with abandon.

FAIL

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL


**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 15:16, Blogger snug.bug said...

You're lying, ButtGirl. You don't provide direct links and citations
to support your libelous claims that I am a college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert.

I used to provide links here, but since you and Ian would only spam them away there was no point in it.

 
At 16 December, 2012 15:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The goat fucker lies, "...You don't provide direct links and citations to support your libelous claims that I am a college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert."

What's this, liar?

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

You're college dropout because you're a proven idiot.

You're a failed janitor by your own admission.

Carol Brouillet proved you're a sex pervert -- and you've been kicked out of the so-called 9/11 "truth" movement as a result of your perversion. Hell, even the liars and crazies who make up the "truth" movement refuse to associate with a proven sex predator.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 16 December, 2012 16:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 16 December, 2012 17:10, Blogger snug.bug said...

Those are not links supporting your libelous claims that I am a college dropout, failed janitor and sex pervert, ButtGirl. You have provided no such links, though you claimed you had. You can't remember your lies from one post to the next.

Those links also do not support your ridiculous claims that I have a "homicidal elevator mechanic theory".

Your link to your own lying google site would not be evidence admissible in a court of law, and hardly constitutes Carol Brouillet proving I'm a sex pervert. You seem to confuse your own baseless authority with Carol's. Your mind is going, ButtGirl. I warned you that Ian's influence would be dire. Look at yourself, propping up your delusions with more delusions. You're pathetic.

 
At 16 December, 2012 17:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Stop trying to change the subject, asshole. You're college dropout because you're a proven idiot. You're a failed janitor by your own admission. Carol Brouillet proved you're a sex pervert.

The 9/11 "truth" movement, moreover, kicked you out of the movement and banned you from practically every troofer website and blog on the Internet once Carol exposed your degeneracy. Additionally, we watched as Snowcrash complained to Cosmos about your sex predation. Cosmos believed our version of the story and banned your sorry ass from TroofAction.

FAIL

Face it, liar, you don't have a shred of evidence to support your lies, smears and innuendo.

Your continued reliance on deceitful non-replies to my perfectly legitimate questions makes it clear to everyone that you're STONEWALLING because you're simply unable to support your lies, smears and innuendo with facts. So when do you plan to provide evidence to support your 100% fact-free homicidal elevator mechanic conspiracy nonsense?

Now stop changing the subject and answer the goddamned questions, liar.

[1] Where's the evidence that you allege incriminates the elevator mechanics in the collapse of the WTC towers?

[2] Where's the evidence to show that explosives and incendiaries were planted inside the WTC towers by the alleged homicidal elevator mechanics?

[3] Where's the sourced scientific evidence to show that an alleged "incendiary coating" can cut or sufficiently weaken 50, 70 or 100 ksi structural steel and initiate progressive collapse of the structure?

As anyone who's paying attention can see, you don't have a scintilla of evidence to support your idiotic conspiracy propaganda.

Again you won't answer the questions because all you have are lies, smear tactics and innuendo.

FAIL

 
At 16 December, 2012 17:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Ian, the fact is that a six-month elevator renovations project in the WTC provided cover for anyone who wanted access to 15 miles of elevator shafts. There was ample opportunity to place explosive or incendiary devices in or around the core columns of the towers. Dr. Jones has suggested that incendiary coatings could have been placed by workers who thought they were spraying ordinary paint." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...You know why the elevator guys don't talk about 9/11? Because there were 70 elevator mechanics at the WTC on 9/11, and a lot of civilians died trapped in the elevators, and not one of those 70 mechanics died." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 September 2010.

"...If you would bother to go to historycommons and search on ACE elevator, you will find a USA Today article that comments on the mysterious absence of the elevator mechanics on that day. I believe it even comments that elevator mechanics have a culture of engaging in rescue operations, so their behavior was quite peculiar." -- Lying Brian Good, 20 December 2010

"...15 miles of elevator shafts are a little bit more difficult to police than the hoistways in a ten-story building." -- Lying Brian Good, 27 December 2010.

"...An article in Elevator World magazine tells all about the 9-month elevator renovations project...Articles in USAToday also tell about it, and go on to say that 80 elevator mechanics on the site at the WTC violated industry norms of helping in rescue operations when they left the site. They would have known that interlock devices they installed on the elevator doors would have made it very difficult or impossible for people trapped in the cars to escape without expert help." -- Lying Brian Good, 8 September 2011

"...The core columns of the WTC were hollow box columns, and most of them could be accessed from the elevator shafts. In the 6 months before 9/11 the largest elevator renovation project in history went on there. Charges could easily be concealed inside the hollow core columns, or disguised as electrical conduit, or applied as a spray-on coating." -- Lying Brian Good, 29 November 2010

Now, tell us more about "reckless and foolish claims," you lying, cheesy electric donkey bottom biter.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home