Friday, April 19, 2013

Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect #2: 9-11 Truther

Well, I wish I could say this was a surprise, but we've seen it so often now that it's become somewhat routine:

A cached profile photo that matches his picture, and tweets from other users he's interacted with suggest that this is the twitter account of 19-year-old Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev, the fugitive suspect #2 in the Boston Marathon bombings: @J_tsar. The account is listed under the name "Jahar," which is what classmates called him because his full name was hard to pronounce.
 Here's his 9-11 Truth Tweet:
 Idk why it's hard for many of you to accept that 9/11 was an inside job, I mean I guess f*ck the facts y'all are some real
 Kind of makes the previously revealed fact that he obtained his US citizenship ten days later, on September 11, 2012 a little more ironic.

 Update: And the Willie Nelson theory checks out as well:

The younger Boston Marathon bombing suspect seemed more interested in blunts than bombs while in college in Massachusetts, his classmate told POLITICO on Friday.
“He didn’t seem like a dangerous person at all,” said Chris Barry, a sophomore at UMass-Dartmouth, who became friends with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev — now a bombing suspect — on their first day of school. “He was a pothead, a normal pothead. I couldn’t even imagine him being mad at someone, let alone hurting someone.”
 Update II: Like mother, like son:
Kilzer also claims that the mother's beliefs increasingly made her uncomfortable, which partially led to her ceasing to visit Tsarnaeva in 2012:
"She started quoting conspiracy theories, telling me that she thought 9-11 was purposefully created by the American government to make America hate muslims. “It’s real,” she said, “My son knows all about it. You can read on the internet.” I have to say I felt kind of scared and vulnerable when she said this, as I am distinctly American, and was lying practically naked in her living room."
 And the aunt:

An aunt of the men suspected of carrying out Monday’s bombing of the Boston Marathon on Friday said that she had a hunch that the FBI may have staged a photo of her nephews at the scene of the crime, and she also had doubts about the official story behind the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
Speaking to reporters at her home in Toronto, Maret Tsarnaeva told reporters that she had contacted the FBI after seeing photos and video that the agency released of 19-year-old Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev and 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev because she strongly believed that they could not have committed the crime.
 Hat Tip: Puppycow at JREF.

Labels:

61 Comments:

At 19 April, 2013 21:09, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

Doh!

 
At 19 April, 2013 21:43, Blogger James B. said...

I guess his mom is too.

http://alyssalindley.tumblr.com/post/48368749553/ive-met-the-boston-bombers

 
At 19 April, 2013 22:01, Blogger Jon Gold said...

http://911truthnews.com/911-truth-has-always-been-non-violent/

 
At 19 April, 2013 23:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Jon "May I have another Big Mac" Gold claims the troof movement has always been non-violent.

Bullshit -- you fucking liar!

What's this fat boy?

E,g.,

[1] Sean Fitzgerald, who stabbed his father, Dr. Edward Fitzgerald, to death while his mom slept in the same bed;

[2] Curtiss Maynard, who murdered his wife, Melissa Meza, 34, before killing himself;

[3] James W. Von Brunn, who murdered Holocaust Museum security guard Stephen Tyrone Johns, 39;

[4] Kurt Sonnenfeld, who allegedly murdered his wife, Nancy Sonnenfeld, 36. Today, Sonnenfeld is a fugitive who lives in Argentina. He is wanted for murder by the Denver police and the FBI;

[5] Richard Poplawski, a rabid 9/11 troofer and devoted Alex Jones fan who killed three Pittsburgh, PA cops;

[6] Jared Loughner, who murdered six people in an Arizona shooting spree;

[7] John Patrick Bedell, the Pentagon shooter, who was killed after wounding two police officers;

[7] Byron Williams, who instigated a shootout with the California Highway Patrol but failed to kill anyone.

and [8] Philip Marshall who murdered his two teenaged children and his dog in cold blood before he turned the weapon on himself.

Counting the bombing in Boston, that's a total of 17 Americans who've perished at the hands of 9/11 "truthers".

Any more lies for us -- you grossly obese degenerate?

Fuck you, liar.

**********

Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 20 April, 2013 01:35, Blogger Pat said...

Jon, great to hear you have some spare moments from the Cindy Sheehan bike ride for peace, or whatever it's called. How are you finding riding across the country?

 
At 20 April, 2013 09:07, Blogger Jon Gold said...

GuitarBill... can you show me anywhere on any prominent 9/11 Truth statement where violence is called for? No? That's what I thought.

 
At 20 April, 2013 09:16, Blogger Pat Cowardly said...

More impotent bunk from Pat Curley, propagandist and pseudoskeptic. RUN from those questions you can't answer, Patty! RUN from presenting the sources for your "explanations"!

Run faster online than you've EVER been able to run in real life.
Go!

 
At 20 April, 2013 09:46, Blogger James B. said...

I don't think we have ever said that the truther movement has called for violence. In fact I have several times said that their activity level is so low they act as if they don't really believe their own claims. Most truthers can't even get past posting a few youtube videos. Lets face it, they are too lazy and stupid to lead a violent revolution.

The phenomenon that is happening, however, is that in the giant Venn diagram that is life truthers and crazy violent paranoid psychotic people who believe in fringe theories share a lot of the same space.

 
At 20 April, 2013 10:53, Blogger Ian said...

The phenomenon that is happening, however, is that in the giant Venn diagram that is life truthers and crazy violent paranoid psychotic people who believe in fringe theories share a lot of the same space.

Not to mention that in order to be a truther, or to be the kind of person who bombs the Boston Marathon, you have to be a weirdo who doesn't fit in with normal people.

I mean, look at who ends up in the truth movement: losers with no job, or no friends, or no romantic relationships (or in Brian Good's case, all of the above).

 
At 20 April, 2013 18:19, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

http://911truthnews.com/911-truth-has-always-been-non-violent/

What a load of crap. The homicide offender rate for the general male population is 11.3 per 100,000. Among 9/11 Truthers, it's now 52.9 per 100,000.

9/11 Truthers are violent, stupid people. The numbers prove it.

 
At 21 April, 2013 01:44, Blogger Jay said...

I was just wondering what Richard Gage would be thinking right now, to see the same idiots that believe the 9/11 conspiracy crap, believe all the shitty conspiracies that have come out after the bombing in Boston. And that one of the suspects believes in a 9/11 inside job.

 
At 21 April, 2013 16:56, Blogger TruthersrAlwaysWrong said...

When in doubt of 1 of their own killing innocent people with guns or bombs the Twoofers secretly and covertly cover up any kind of relationship with the known felons and distance themselves from them to make it look like the person was a lone assassin.

Kind of ironic wouldn't you say? They say we cover up things and lie and then they don't believe in the lone assassins.

What do you have to say for yourselves?

 
At 22 April, 2013 06:39, Blogger Len said...

"can you show me anywhere on any prominent 9/11 Truth statement where violence is called for"

Let's see Fetzer and Barett for starters.

 
At 22 April, 2013 08:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

Thanks for proving the point, Len. Both Barrett and Fetzer have effectively been ejected from the truth movement.

 
At 22 April, 2013 10:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"snug.bug" (aka, Brian Good) lies, "...Both Barrett and Fetzer have effectively been ejected from the truth movement."

Says SLC's resident lying homosexual degenerate who was kicked out of the 9/11 "truth" movement because he's a lying homosexual sex stalker.

Cretin.

**********

Brian Good's (aka, "snug.bug) Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).

9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!

 
At 22 April, 2013 12:17, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"Thanks for proving the point, Len. Both Barrett and Fetzer have effectively been ejected from the truth movement."

No, shit pools, the troofers have simply masses into their sad little turd islands with Bwian floating all by himself.

 
At 22 April, 2013 13:22, Blogger snug.bug said...

Poor MGF and GutterBall--they have a great need to feel superior, and the only way they can maintain their illusions is to invent lies about others.

Of course, being superior is not that difficult. One need only be informed, be honest, be truthful. But that's too much work for these clowns.

 
At 22 April, 2013 14:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 22 April, 2013 15:35, Blogger Ian said...

Hey, Brian's been released from jail and can post dumbspam about magic thermite elves again.

Welcome back, Brian!

 
At 22 April, 2013 15:36, Blogger Ian said...

Just think, there are 300 questions asked by the widows, and only 27 of them were answered, but rather than work to get the remaining 273 questions answered, Brian would rather just spam this blog with 3rd-grade name-calling of M. Gregory Ferris and GuitarBill. It's sad, really.

 
At 22 April, 2013 19:21, Blogger snug.bug said...

Stupid liars like ButtGoo get so careless that they claim knowledge of things they can not possibly know. BWA-HA-HA!

And where's ButtGoo's buddy, El Mentira Cerdo?

 
At 22 April, 2013 19:53, Blogger Petgoat said...

Actually, I was banned from Truthaction when Cosmos learned that I'm a sex predator. In fact, it's common knowledge that I tried to sexually harass a fellow troofer who happens to also be a married woman. I guess my twisted bisexual fantasies about a menage a trois involving myself, Carol Brouillet and William Rodriguez turned Carol's stomach. That's when Carol informed her husband about my sexual advances. Needless to say, her husband threatened to rip my head off and shit down my neck if I ever spoke to his wife again.

Yes, I'm a twisted fuck.

After all, I look at a man's hairy ass and think to myself, "you know I'd like to fuck that."

Yep, I'm twisted fuck.

Worship me! I'm a sex degenerate and a compulsive liar!

 
At 22 April, 2013 20:26, Blogger Ian said...

I see Brian no longer wants to talk about 9/11. He's finally accepted that 9/11 truth is dead.

 
At 23 April, 2013 00:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

1886 architects and engineers.

 
At 23 April, 2013 00:34, Blogger Petgoat said...

Translation from homosexual LieSpeak:

1886 frauds and charlatans.

 
At 23 April, 2013 04:09, Blogger Ian said...

1886 architects and engineers.

Tiny crackpot fringe.

 
At 23 April, 2013 04:11, Blogger Ian said...

BTW, Brian's behavior since returning here is really bizarre (more so than normal, I mean). My guess is the judge ordered him back on medication after this latest brush with the law, and now Brian's acting all giddy as a side effect of the psychiatric drugs he's on.

 
At 23 April, 2013 07:51, Blogger snug.bug said...

So on Planet Liananity, 6 AIA Fellows, 40 PhD engineers, and 10 Stanford engineers are crackpots because they know things Lian doesn't know, understand things Lian doesn't understand, have investigated things Lian hasn't investigated, and conclude things Lian doesn't conclude.

 
At 23 April, 2013 07:57, Blogger snug.bug said...

Donde esta la mentira porcina?

 
At 23 April, 2013 12:06, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"So on Planet Liananity, 6 AIA Fellows, 40 PhD engineers, and 10 Stanford engineers are crackpots because they know things Lian doesn't know, understand things Lian doesn't understand, have investigated things Lian hasn't investigated, and conclude things Lian doesn't conclude."

And yet not one of them has bothered to investigate 9/11 on their own. All of these prestigious men and women think something is wrong yet cannot organize to perform their own work?

Why?

Because they suck.

 
At 23 April, 2013 15:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 23 April, 2013 16:10, Blogger snug.bug said...

How do you know none of them has investigated 9/11 on their own? When you claim knowledge you can not possibly have, you only demonstrate your intellectual incompetence.

 
At 23 April, 2013 17:05, Blogger Ian said...

So on Planet Liananity, 6 AIA Fellows, 40 PhD engineers, and 10 Stanford engineers are crackpots because they know things Lian doesn't know, understand things Lian doesn't understand, have investigated things Lian hasn't investigated, and conclude things Lian doesn't conclude.

And yet none of them bother to make a case for 9/11 truth. The only one who does that is a mentally ill unemployed janitor who wears women's underwear. Strange, isn't it.

How do you know none of them has investigated 9/11 on their own? When you claim knowledge you can not possibly have, you only demonstrate your intellectual incompetence.

Please link to the journal papers that these alleged "truthers" have submitted, arguing the case for 9/11 truth.

 
At 23 April, 2013 17:05, Blogger Ian said...

And I'd like to remind Brian that there are 273 unanswered questions from the widows that he does not care about, and will not take the time to get answered. He'd rather just spam this blog.

 
At 23 April, 2013 17:19, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you lie. Many of the experts made the case for 9/11 Truth in the DVD "9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out".

You move the goal posts from "investigation" to "journal pages".

I push for answers to the widows' questions almost every day. When you clowns claim knowledge of things you can not possibly know, you only show yourselves for fools.

 
At 24 April, 2013 04:57, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you lie. Many of the experts made the case for 9/11 Truth in the DVD "9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out".

Thanks for proving my point. There has been no challenge in the scientific community to the consensus on 9/11, but hey, there are DVDs! They can be yours for only $19.99! Act now!

You move the goal posts from "investigation" to "journal pages".

There's been no investigation either.

I push for answers to the widows' questions almost every day.

False. All you do "every day" is post homosexual stalker spam about Willie Rodriguez at this blog (the one place where you haven't been banned for being a liar and a lunatic).

When you clowns claim knowledge of things you can not possibly know, you only show yourselves for fools.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Poor Brian, I've humiliated him again by reminding him that 9/11 truth is dead, and that he's an unemployed janitor who lives with his parents and was banned from the truth movement.

 
At 24 April, 2013 04:59, Blogger Ian said...

Brian Good trägt Damenunterwäsche!

 
At 24 April, 2013 07:46, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian ist ein Lügner.

 
At 24 April, 2013 07:56, Blogger snug.bug said...

There has been no challenge in the scientific community to the consensus on 9/11

What makes you think there's a consensus on 9/11? Since 40 of architects and engineers for truth are PhD engineers, their opinions that the investigations are inadequate can hardly been seen as a lack of challenge.

There has been no challenge to the 1886 architects and engineers calling for new investigations. For you to claim that 1886 architects and engineers making a challenge is no challenge, and then argue that the lack of challenge to the architects and engineers is only proof that their assertions are silly, that shows you to be employing different standards.

You can watch the DVD free online.

How do you know the engineers have not investigated the issues? How do you think they arrived at their opinions that the official investigations were inadequate?


You have no idea what I do every day, Lian, and for you to pretend to knowledge you can not possibly have only shows you for a fool.

 
At 24 April, 2013 17:11, Blogger Ian said...

Ian ist ein Lügner.

quietschen, quietschen, quietschen!

 
At 24 April, 2013 17:17, Blogger Ian said...

What makes you think there's a consensus on 9/11?

The fact that only liars and lunatics have challenged the official reports suggests a consensus.

Since 40 of architects and engineers for truth are PhD engineers, their opinions that the investigations are inadequate can hardly been seen as a lack of challenge.

So provide us with the papers they've submitted that challenge the consensus.

There has been no challenge to the 1886 architects and engineers calling for new investigations.

That's because nobody cares about them. If 9/11 truth were something that a large number of people believed, like creationism, you'd likely see rebuttals of it from reputable scientists. Since it's a tiny crackpot cult, nobody bothers to refute it.

You can watch the DVD free online.

Nobody cares.

How do you know the engineers have not investigated the issues? How do you think they arrived at their opinions that the official investigations were inadequate?

Please provide their papers that outline their opinions that the official investigations were inadequate.

You have no idea what I do every day, Lian, and for you to pretend to knowledge you can not possibly have only shows you for a fool.

My, such squealing!

 
At 24 April, 2013 17:18, Blogger Ian said...

So to sum up, there are no scientific challenges to the consensus on 9/11. There's just the hysterical squealing of a failed janitor and liar who lives with his parents and has a hideous homeless mullet.

Thanks for proving my point, Brian. 9/11 truth is dead.

 
At 24 April, 2013 18:44, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Since 40 of architects and engineers for truth are PhD engineers,

Only one or two of the PhD's are in relevant fields. The rest are irrelevant: electrical, mechanical, chemical, landscaping, regional planning.

 
At 24 April, 2013 19:27, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ali Mojahid, Dr., PhD, P.E, S.I,
S.I. is a Special Inspector in Florida. A structural engineer.

Ali M. Oskoorvouchi
PhD in Civil Engineering (Geotechnical),
California licensed Civil and Geotechnical Engineer.

James R. Carr, PhD, P.E.(geological engineering) licensed Geological Engineer 1987 (exp 2008)
The Geological Engineering degree applies physics, chemistry, meteorology, hydrology, biology, geology and engineering science to understanding the Earth.

Jeffrey Hoffman, PhD, M.S., B.S., P.E. (Mechanical Engineer)
20 years of experience in the areas of mechanical design and combustion.

Nick A. Kolev, P.E. Transportation Engineer, PhD-Civil, Material Sce
Expertise in modem laboratory analysis of building materials (DTA, X-Ray, Infra Red Spectroscopy, Crystal-Optic Microscopy)

I have witnessed a lab. mechanical destruction of hundreds of steel and reinforced concrete samples.

Richard C. Cabot, Ph.D., P.E.
PhD EE, MS Mechanics
Masters in Mechanics, the physics of moving bodies

Robert Regl, PhD Engineer
Lic: MS, UT retired
BS and MS in Civil Engineering and a PhD in Engineering Mechanics. I have worked as a structural analyst in the offshore oil industry and as a viscoelastic materials expert working on the redesign of the Solid Rocket Boosters following the Challenger disaster. I have also been on the engineering faculties of the University of Illinois (1967-1970) and Mississippi State University (1970-1980).

Robert Lund Sogge, PhD, PE Civil Engineer
Lic: AZ Civil 10296, CA C 26042

Robert M. Bowman, Dr., Lt. Col., USAF, ret; Engineering Manager
PhD, Aeronautics & Nuclear Eng, Caltech

Alvin M. Bloom, Engineering Consultant
BS, MS, PhD Aerospace Engineering

Aexander Tzetzo, PhD Aerospace Engineering

I have over ten years of Industry experience in the field of Structural Dynamics.

David Gregg, PhD, Chemical Engineer

Edwin L. Force, PhD, Retired
PhD, Chemical Engineering, UC Berkeley

That's for starters. Now while you're explaining why chemical engineering, civil engineering, materials science, aeronautical engineering, geotechnical engineering, structural engineering, mechanical engineering are irrelevant to the Ground Zero incident, I can finish the list later.

I used to think you were about the only honest poster in the forum (aside from me). It's plain that you've caught the Ian disease and the MGF disease. You lie carelessly and you make up your facts.

 
At 24 April, 2013 20:08, Blogger Ian said...

I see Brian is trying to bury my posts in dumbspam. He knows that none of these alleged "truthers" have published anything questioning the consensus on 9/11.

The only person questioning the consensus on 9/11 is Brian, and he's a mentally ill unemployed janitor, so his views can be dismissed out of hand.

 
At 24 April, 2013 20:11, Blogger Ian said...

I used to think you were about the only honest poster in the forum (aside from me).

Brian, you're not honest. You're a pathetic liar. You lie when you claim you're not petgoat. You lie when you claim you weren't banned from the truth movement for stalking Carol Brouillet. You lie when you say you didn't run away squealing and crying from debate challenges from Rodriguez and Ranke.

At least you were telling the truth when you said that you failed out of San Jose State.

 
At 24 April, 2013 20:13, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Now while you're explaining why chemical engineering, civil engineering, materials science, aeronautical engineering, geotechnical engineering, structural engineering, mechanical engineering are irrelevant to the Ground Zero incident,

Most of what you list is irrelevant by definition. Aeronautical? Geotechnical? You bought beer tonight, I can tell.

 
At 24 April, 2013 20:19, Blogger snug.bug said...

Lian, if you took all the lies out of your posts there'd be nothing left.

RGT, so you think the engineers who design airplanes and who study the effects of earthquakes on buildings don't understand structures?

 
At 24 April, 2013 20:29, Blogger snug.bug said...


Egor Trilisky, Scientist
PhD Chemical Engineering
Seattle, WA

Henry W. Tieleman, PhD Civil Engineering
I have been involved in low-speed aerodynamics specialized in the analysis of wind load on low-rise structures.

Joel S. Hirschhorn Ph.D. Materials Engineering

John Edward Anderson, Ph.D. Astronautics, M.I.T.

Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Minnesota for 23 years, at Boston University for 8 years.


 
At 24 April, 2013 20:43, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

RGT, so you think the engineers who design airplanes and who study the effects of earthquakes on buildings don't understand structures?

Their education, and therefore their expertise, are irrelevant to fire-induced building collapses.

 
At 24 April, 2013 21:02, Blogger snug.bug said...

Can you name anyone who is has a PhD in fire-induced building collapses?

 
At 24 April, 2013 21:09, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

Can you name anyone who is has a PhD in fire-induced building collapses?

Now you're just being silly. Finish that one and go to bed.

 
At 24 April, 2013 21:33, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 24 April, 2013 21:35, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 24 April, 2013 22:06, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, so you claim that the experience and training of our PhDs is irrelevant when you can't name anyone who has relevant experience and training.

Like Lian, you employ differing standards for your evidence than you impose on our evidence--and you change the subject to me when I show that your claims were absurd about the qualifications of the PhD Engineers for Truth.



John Shinn PhD, Chemical Engineer

John Silva Ph.D., Engineering Science, UC San Diego

Jonathan Rivin PhD, Engineering, North Carolina State U

Larry Erickson PhD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Retired NASA engineer (33 years). Performed research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter.

Mark Allen PhD, Engineering, U. of Pennsylvania

Matthew E. H. Petering
PhD, Engineering, University of Michigan

Saleh M. Sbenaty, PhD Engineering
Taught physics, statics, dynamics, eng. fundamentals, and other engineering courses.

Timothy Joseph Ellison Ph.D. Physics [I.U.]; B.S. Eng [U of ND]

Dario Sosa, Engineer, PhD, University of Las Palmas de G.C.

Dr. Robert T. Mote PhD, Structural Engineer
+20 years experience in structural design. Special interest in dynamic and explosion behaviour of structural elements and foundations.

Ibrahim R. Soudy, PhD,PE,SE,PEng.
License #: C 66076, S 4876 CA, C&S 39805 WA, C& S 74895PE OR
28 years of combined academic and practical experience in the design and evaluation of bridges, buildings, offshore, marine and materials handling structures. The topics of his graduate research work are in Earthquake Engineering, Structural Dynamics, and Soil-Structure Interaction. He worked on projects in the U.S., Canada, South America, Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia including Design-Build-Finance-Operate projects. He has lectured at UBC on bridge seismic design. Dr. Soudy is a registered Professional Engineer and Structural Engineer in the states of California, Washington, Oregon, Guma, and British Columbia.

Ivan Nemec,PhD
Ass. Prof 2002,
co-author of several books, today teaching nonlinear mechanics.

Jim Evans, Dr - CEng (mechanical engineering)
PhD in structural mechanics (wire rope fatigue)

Kaelig Triballier, PhD Physics/Energetics/Aerothermochemist

Salam Al-Bizri, BSCE, PhD in Const. Mang.



 
At 25 April, 2013 04:49, Blogger Ian said...

Boy, Brian just keeps posting more and more hysterical spam to try to cover up the fact that there are no scientific challenges to the consensus on 9/11.

 
At 25 April, 2013 08:08, Blogger snug.bug said...

To Lian, a list of the PhD engineers with qualifications directly applicable to analysis of the Ground Zero incident is "hysterical spam".

Who are you trying to fool, Lian? 8-year-olds? You don't fool anyone else.

 
At 25 April, 2013 15:36, Blogger Ian said...

To Lian, a list of the PhD engineers with qualifications directly applicable to analysis of the Ground Zero incident is "hysterical spam".

Who are you trying to fool, Lian? 8-year-olds? You don't fool anyone else.


Brian, I've asked you many times: please present the papers that these scientists have submitted that challenge the consensus on 9/11.

So far I don't see any papers. I just see the hysterical spam of a mentally ill unemployed janitor.

 
At 25 April, 2013 16:06, Blogger snug.bug said...

More lying Lyinanity from Lian.

 
At 25 April, 2013 20:09, Blogger Ian said...

Thanks for proving my point. There are no scientific challenges to the scientific consensus on 9/11.

There's just your hysterical squealing because I've defeated you yet again.

 
At 26 April, 2013 09:04, Blogger snug.bug said...

Your belief that there is a scientific consensus about 9/11 is absurd. You can't provide any evidence for that. Your belief that there are no scientific challenges to the official version of events is also absurd.

You defeat only yourself.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home