One Way to Handle the Nutters
With the recent bombings in Boston, it doesn't take a genius to predict that the conspiracy nutters are going to be all over it, with Alex Jones leading the pack. This guy decided to preempt them by registering http://bostonmarathonconspiracy.com/ before they could. Unfortunately, they can still come up with millions of other ways to spread their inanity.
posted by James B. @ 6:43 PM
14 comments
14 Comments:
"Unfortunately, they can still come up with millions of other ways to spread their inanity." -Lames
In other words, the "nutters" haven't been "handled" at all, and your whole premise is unsupported by your "research". Just more filler that never debunks anything. What a shock!
If you learned to write, it would be a little less obvious that you and Pat are full of shit.
@Pat Cowardly
The problem here isnt ones need to learn to write, the problem is ones need to develop better reading comprehension skills.
The title of the article is stated ONE Way to Handle Nutters, with emphasis on one. The word one is defined as being a single unit or thing or being one in particular. When this article was written the op proclaimed that this was ONE of many ways to "handle nutters" that is why he wrote at the end of the article
"Unfortunately, they can still come up with millions of other ways to spread their inanity."
Do you understand now? Do people have to walk you thru every topic like this? This was a simple topic and you totally fail to understand what was stated not sure if you misinterpreted on purpose or you just couldnt comprehend the statements.
So if we had to choose between which one it was you almost have to admit that you are the one thats full of shit or either you are just dumb. Which one is it?
Now James is dodging the question and allowing baroderp to answer--poorly-- for him.
You're ignoring the word HANDLE in your pathetic attempt come to his rescue, Barge-ass69. If they'd been 'handled', then they wouldn't be able to come up with millions of ways to spread their inanity.
Maybe you haven't noticed the long-standing pattern of James and Pat mumbling and stumbling through their 'debunking', never citing any sources, and failing to make any case at all. Or maybe you're just a sad sock puppet. Good luck with that.
This comment has been removed by the author.
baroger619 wrote, "...Do you understand now? Do people have to walk you thru every topic like this? This was a simple topic and you totally fail to understand what was stated not sure if you misinterpreted on purpose or you just couldn't comprehend the statements."
In case you haven't noticed, every comment written by Ali the Arab Child Molester (aka "Pat Cowardly"/"Arhoolie" the anti-Semite) is a straw man argument. And yes, he deliberately misinterprets your argument. Like "snug.bug" (aka Brian Good, sex predator), he's intellectually dishonest to the core.
Should we expect less from an Arab pedophile with a low double-digit IQ? Probably not.
And yes, Ali the Arab Cild Molester does, in fact, foam at the mouth when you ignore him.
LOL!
**********
Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
You're ignoring the word HANDLE in your pathetic attempt come to his rescue
Oh look, another autodidact arguing word definitions. Let's take him seriously.
Would it be wonderful if the Bombings were the result of conspiratists?
@Pat Cowardly
Your view of the world is very short sighted and it shows in your post. James has no say so of what I type nor does he employ me to answer questions. It seems staring at that computer monitor, obsessing about this blog, and your infatuation with Pat has made your view of how people operate and socialize distorted.
Cowardly, handle is a word that I am ignoring in favor of the context of the WHOLE sentence. You are ignoring the whole sentence and like people who illogically cherry pick and quote out of context, one can usually attribute poor reading comprehension skills, the same poor comprehension you are so elegantly displaying in this thread.
But after all this typing I have been thinking, you in a small way are right. ALL truthers havent been handled, but some have, as its hard to get a grip on the insane and the illogical beings that display this "truth" banter so well w/o being a doctor who can prescribe medication. After you blast them with facts they find some other thing to quibble about that has no relevance to the whole topic. I thought it was just with 9/11 but it seems to be every day standard practice for you nutters to do this.
This blog destroyed Loose Change where the hell have you been? I wasnt aware that James and Pat were 9/11 truthers!! Stumbling and bumbling never citing any sources, and failing to make any case at all, that is a definite truther trait. What case have you made cowardly? Where are you at in your court proceedings to get the "evidence" reviewed? And these guys apparently have made a case because you obsess over this blog like the arm-chair warrior that you are instead of taking action because you obviously feel this blog is more of a threat to the truth movement than anything else.
Thats why you are here cowardly to argue with anonymous internet bunkers instead of taking action and putting your neck on the line. You are afraid, simply put.
@ GuitarBill
Like all truthers it doesnt surprise me that he tries builds his case on logical fallacies.
Straw man and misinterpreting arguments, where would the TM be w/o these two dishonest tactics.
Thanks for the advice, I should have known that one who stalks others over the internet should be ignored because attention is all they are seeking but its so tempting to address the stupidity displayed by these irrational beings.
"James has no say so of what I type nor does he employ me to answer questions." baroderp
Never said he did. Try to comprehend.
"ALL truthers havent been handled, but some have..."
By the purchase of a single website? Care to back up your claim?
"This blog destroyed Loose Change"
Source? Proof? anything?
"to argue with anonymous internet bunkers"
Oops, your Freudian slit is showing.
You sure used a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. You aren't very good at this, are you? Guess you're in good company...
You sure 'handled' me, boy *chuckle*. Now hurry up and write a few more paragraphs of nonsense for James. He needs you right now, so put on your big boy pants.
You sure 'handled' me, boy *chuckle*.
Pat and James are smarter than you. They've defeated you. Accept it.
Speaking of defeat, I wonder how old GutterBall's Wayne Newton Tribute Act is doing.
Speaking of defeat, I wonder how old GutterBall's Wayne Newton Tribute Act is doing.
Just think, there are 300 questions asked by the widows, and only 27 of them were answered, but rather than work to get the remaining 273 questions answered, Brian would rather just spam this blog with nonsense about Wayne Newton tribute bands. It's sad, really.
Post a Comment
<< Home