Who Was Really Behind 9-11?
Abby Scott looked into it and discovered to her horror and dismay, that it was none other than... Abby Scott!
posted by Pat @ 6:26 PM
6 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Monday, June 12, 2006
Previous Posts
- More Nuts
- Burn Baby Burn
- The Great Debate
- A Bold Speaker of Truth To Power
- The Scientific Approach
- The Incendiary Planes Theory
- Loose Change In Real Life
- Google Notes Loose Change Searches
- If You Are a CIA Shill Please Raise Your Hand
- The "No Todd Beamer" Theory
View My Stats
Allies:
6 Comments:
... bitch.
Hey, I'm not saying anything.
I'm just asking questions.
Thanks, guys!
Glad to send some of our silly traffic your way, Abby, and loved the whole story. :)
Why would we find it interesting? It's just more of the same paranoia-induced fiction that we've debunked here numerous times. There isn't one single original argument either in the article, or in the comments.
It all makes sense now!
Wait, no it doesn't!
People who believe 9/11 was "perpetrated to give probable cause" to invade Iraq are just nuts in general. It drives me crazy that people can be this nearsighted.
We had probable cause without 9/11; 9/11 just gave us motivation and increased urgency. The probable cause was simple and concrete: Saddam was required (by the fucking UN) to admit inspectors unconditionally. He flatly denied them, for years. He was given 2 or 3 final-chances, and still flatly denied them. That was probable cause enough, regardless of WMD's (which we SAW when we were there in the early '90s, so we had reasonable suspicion -- it's why there even existed a UN mandate!!) Come on, people...
Post a Comment
<< Home