Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Morgan Reyolds Booted from Spine

It's tempting to cheer them:

I am sorry that it has come to this, but when I recently saw the video clip of your FOX TV interview, I hit the roof. I believe it was precipitous of you to go public with an unproven theory regarding video fakery. In doing so, you created a situation that has set the whole movement back.

Indeed, even if I HAD undoubted proof that the plane videos were faked, I would keep such information to myself, knowing that it is a) largely irrelevant to the overall picture that the hijackings were stage-managed, and b) making a hard sell 100 tmes harder.

The association of your name with SPINE must now come to an end simply because of the enormous loss of credibility we will suffer every time a visitor who is familar with your position sees your name on our website. Should you reconsider your position and make it public, I will reconsider mine. This is not a scientific position, but a management decision.


But this is still SPINE, which thinks the "Zionists" were behind 9-11:

Question 6. Are you saying the Jews are behind 911?

Answer: Certainly not. Although Israel is ostensibly a Jewish state, its actions in the middle east are in direct conflict with Jewish Law, ethics and morality. The European (Khazarite) Jews may be described as double victims, suffering not only from centuries of persecution after the fall of Muslim Spain, but from the deceptive practices adopted by the Zionist planners responsible for Israel. Myths such as “a land without people for a people without land” (both questionable propositions) misled thousands of settlers in the Jewish proto-state, followed by millions later.

20 Comments:

At 09 January, 2007 16:20, Blogger shawn said...

Our friend coverup doesn't seem to understand which is more of a threat, the Jew or the Islamist.

I'm sure there's French spies in our country, Germans, too. Perhaps a couple of Brits sprinkled in. But since none of them are trying to blow us up I don't see the trouble.

 
At 09 January, 2007 16:40, Blogger Alex said...

The Brits have one of the oldest spy networks in the world. You can bet your ass they have more than just "a couple" in the US.

There's a new theory for ya. Maybe the Brits blew up the WTC in response to all the "bad teeth" jokes that Americans keep throwing at 'em.

 
At 09 January, 2007 17:10, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

number of friends invited to my party...100

number of enemies who want to kill me invited...ZERO!!!!!!!

TAM

 
At 09 January, 2007 18:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Number of israeli spies inside the US aprehended by the FBI leading up to 9/11: around 120


Actually, only a few of them were spies, a lot of the others seemed to be an intelligence gathering group posing as 'art students' connected to the ectasy trade.

The spies seemed to be spying on the 9/11 hijackers, 4 of them were the infamous dancing Israelis (posing as arabs) who most definitely knew in advance of the attacks (Mossad has a policy of not sharing any foreknowledge with anybody outside it's intelligence agency, read Victor Ostrovsky's work if you'd like to know more). They worked for a moving company called 'Urban Moving Company', which later (after 9/11) turned out to be a Mossad front. The spies and the 'art students' were arrested for visa violations and most of them got deported back to Israel.

 
At 09 January, 2007 18:41, Blogger Cl1mh4224rd said...

"Indeed, even if I HAD undoubted proof that the plane videos were faked, I would keep such information to myself. . ."

It's funny... They openly admit that they would use the very same tactics they accuse the U.S. government of using.

We've already seen untold numbers of mined quotes and outright lies spew forth from their movement, and now one of their own admits that he would withhold evidence.

 
At 09 January, 2007 19:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I really think the following movie and website needs to be debunked. We need to get on this!

The movie "9/11: Press for Truth" should be debunked.

View the trailer for the movie at the following website:

( Running Time: 2 min. 13 sec.)

http://www.911pressfortruth.com/

Watch the entire film at Google Video:

( Running Time: 1 hr. 24 min. 21 sec. )

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5589099104255077250&q=9%2F11%3A+Press+for+Truth

The Complete 9/11 Timeline at the Center for Cooperative Research website needs to be debunked as well:

Complete 9/11 Timeline:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Patriots Question 9/11 website needs to be dubunked as well:

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com

LET'S GET ON IT!

 
At 09 January, 2007 20:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

/11 Press for Truth is based on emotion, not facts. The mere fact that they talk about WTC7 but don't talk about the fire fighters like Chief Daniel Nigro really turned me off on that 'film'

It brings nothing to the table.



True.

 
At 10 January, 2007 07:00, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Pat I went to the link and the website. I could not confirm your statement that SPINE thinks Zionists were behind 9/11. Am I missing something at the website or are you trying to link SPINE with anti-semtism to discredit their work, or are you lying outright?

 
At 10 January, 2007 07:01, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Reyolds is a joke a real nutbar. No planes?? Give me a break. Disinfo at its best!

 
At 10 January, 2007 08:48, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Geez CHF tell me how you really feel instead of presenting any meanigful contribution to the post. And you guys slam BG for spamming but your so ADHD you can't even stay on the dam topic.

Know-nothing morons eh?

Every lie that is presented on this website that I have had the opportunity to attack I've done so successfully. From the bouncing ground theory at Shanksville to the 'weren't no explosives' at WTC complex.

What do you provide? Personal attacks that amount to proving you ..well that you know nothing!

And what exactly does Douchebag Dylan offer? Why douchebag comments! Proving he knows even less than you CHF! Amazing isn't it. Tard of a feather stick togther I suppose.

 
At 10 January, 2007 09:02, Blogger Alex said...

Every lie that is presented on this website that I have had the opportunity to attack I've done so successfully.

Funny thing is, every loon that's come to these forums has made the exact same statement. It didn't represented reality when they said it, and you're certainly not doing any better.

 
At 10 January, 2007 09:47, Blogger Pat said...

Swing, they don't think the Jews did it they think the Zionists did it; that's pretty obvious from their faq. Otherwise, why would they even bring it up?

 
At 10 January, 2007 10:06, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Pat, again where do they say they think Zionists pulled off 9/11? Perhaps it is your assumption that they do.

From Their FAQ:
Question 6. Are you saying the Jews are behind 911?

Answer: Certainly not. Although Israel is ostensibly a Jewish state, its actions in the middle east are in direct conflict with Jewish Law, ethics and morality. The European (Khazarite) Jews may be described as double victims, suffering not only from centuries of persecution after the fall of Muslim Spain, but from the deceptive practices adopted by the Zionist planners responsible for Israel. Myths such as “a land without people for a people without land” (both questionable propositions) misled thousands of settlers in the Jewish proto-state, followed by millions later.

As a general rule, zionist organizations in the west have only one tool with which to counter revelations of the myth-building exercise. Whoever makes such claims is labeled an “anti-semite,” a peculiarly ironic charge under the circumstances.


Well I can read a bit about the historical analysis of Zionism in Europe and the Middle East and Zionist organizations and how they handle critiques, but no where do I read, Zionists did 9/11.

Again where are you getting your information or am I missing something in the FAQ?

 
At 10 January, 2007 10:10, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Alex Go back through the posts and show me where YOU proved me wrong on anything.

I await your blank post.

 
At 10 January, 2007 10:28, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

Pat, is that why you put "Zionists" in quotes? To let your readers know that is your interpretation of the facts that aren't there? Or to let your readers know that is your assumption? Or is it to mislead your readers regarding SPINE as a whole?

 
At 10 January, 2007 11:11, Blogger Alex said...

See, just because you fail to acknowledge that you're wrong, doesn't mean you haven't been proven to be wrong. You're just like my uncle - the guy still believes the moon landing was faked, and no matter how much evidence he's shown to the contrary, he keeps insisting he's right. Neither of you will EVER admit to being wrong, but it doesn't matter - you're still an idiot, and you're definitely wrong. Your unwillingness to admit a fact which is obvious to everyone else only proves that you're extremely stubborn as well as being an idiot.

 
At 10 January, 2007 11:24, Blogger Unknown said...

Great catch Alex, he probably does not believe we landed on the moon either. Too bad he never backs up anything with anything but opinion, conjecture and spec

 
At 10 January, 2007 13:14, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Swing:

to the 'weren't no explosives' at WTC complex.

I missed that one. Please, for me, show me where you proved there were explosives used to bring down the WTCs, or were you merely trying to prove that somewhere in those 110 storey buildings, there were explosive chemicals or apparatus. Either way, I'd like to see the PROOF, that we could not refute here.

TAM:)

 
At 10 January, 2007 13:17, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

As for "Press for Truth", as mentioned by the "CT dumbass in Debunkers clothing", I feel it has some good points, but the reason that is true, is that it in no way mentions any crackpot MIHOP theories, and even its insinuations of LIHOP are sparse and well hidden behind the emotions of the victims and their families (very crafty but vile in my opinion of the filmakers to do this...but typical).

TAM

 
At 10 January, 2007 13:22, Blogger FatOllie said...

Although the writer (Dewdney?) of FAQ answer #6 does not explicitly blame "Zionists" for the 911 attacks, it was clearly the writer's intent to lead the reader to infer that the "Zionists" were responible. If the writer is in fact Dewdney, circumspection is wise, considering Canadian law.

For a more explicit "blame the Zionists" attitude at the 911 Physics site see: The Mossad is a leading candidate for architect of the 9/11 attacks. where the author calls the Mossad the "terrorist agency" of Zionism.

Dewdney (who appears to be responsible for the 911 physics flakes and their site) is a sad case among the denial crowd. He's written a couple interesting, though dumbed down, books about BS artists and their techniques and is, apparently, a smart and insightful mathemetician/computer scientist. I just wish he would read one of his own books.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home