Monday, January 18, 2010

Let's Go See Cheney's House



Gripping drama here. Oh, no, wait a minute, it's just a couple of minutes of Cindy Sheehan and Jon Gold traipsing along a road.

67 Comments:

At 18 January, 2010 11:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So that crackerbox Fontainebleau is all that treason buys you?

 
At 18 January, 2010 11:32, Blogger Triterope said...

Cough cough Frisby v. Schultz cough cough.

 
At 18 January, 2010 11:38, Blogger Pat said...

While trooferism gets you the deluxe suite in Mom's basement.

 
At 18 January, 2010 11:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So you find cut-rate treachery more admirable than patriotic sacrifice?

 
At 18 January, 2010 11:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmm, Cindy, according to the news reports, was there to protest UAVs. Seems ol' Jon Gold doesn't like living American servicemen much.

 
At 18 January, 2010 12:03, Anonymous New Yorker said...

So you find cut-rate treachery more admirable than patriotic sacrifice?

What? What fucking sacrifice have these two losers ever made?

 
At 18 January, 2010 12:12, Blogger Walter said...

I have some pity for Sheehan, a woman completely out of her depth intellectually since she was taken up by the truthers (not that she wasn't out of her depth as an anti-war activist). For Gold, however, I have nothing but contempt.

For Gold and other truthers, this meaningless “action” merely serves the purpose of reinforcing their belief system and getting a lame You Tube video.

If Gold really had the courage of his beliefs, he would have attempted to haul himself over Cheney’s fence and gotten his fat ass tasered and beaten by those cops and SS agents.

Now that would have been some real entertainment!
-

 
At 18 January, 2010 12:19, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

I saw that bimbo talking this up on Russia Today, so I expected a fun video. But I didn't expect Jon Gold and that crazy Philly housewife!

Damn, to have Jon Gold as one of her few friends, Cindy Sheehan has sunk to new lows.

 
At 18 January, 2010 12:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually Cindy is a good conversationalist, fun to be with, and has a lot of friends.

What would be served by Jon Gold getting beat up? Cheney probably wasn't even there!

 
At 18 January, 2010 13:06, Blogger Walter said...

What would be served by Jon Gold getting beat up? Cheney probably wasn't even there!

A good laugh? ;-)
-

 
At 18 January, 2010 13:06, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

"Actually Cindy is a good conversationalist, fun to be with, and has a lot of friends."

You mean, people who are using her, like Hugo Chavez and Jon Gold.

 
At 18 January, 2010 15:17, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

Are Jon and Cindy a couple now?

Walter said..."I have some pity for Sheehan"

An admirable thought, but I lose sympathy once they engage in vicious slander.

 
At 18 January, 2010 15:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heh. Xkcd weighs in on troofers.

-manny

 
At 18 January, 2010 15:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well crap. That's pretty useless without the link, isn't it?
http://xkcd.com/690/

-also manny

 
At 18 January, 2010 15:28, Anonymous zendingo said...

happy MLK Jr day, i just love the sentiment. one guy lies our country into a war, one woman loses her son in said war. the slc pov? fuck her, what? what fucking sacrifice has she ever made? god bless america, home of the free and land of the brave.

 
At 18 January, 2010 15:47, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

what fucking sacrifice has she ever made? god bless america, home of the free and land of the brave.

Her sacrifice is admirable, but that doesn't mean she can engage in slander and not be criticized. You twoofers accuse others of committing mass murder on not a shred of credible evidence and then get bent out of shape when someone criticizes you for it. You really need to grow up buddy.

 
At 18 January, 2010 15:48, Anonymous New Yorker said...

one woman loses her son in said war

Yes, it's a very honorable thing she does, using her son's sacrifice to piss on his grave and slander the country he fought for, ranting against Jews, and cuddling with a man who has all but extinguished democracy in Venezuela.

I hate Dick Cheney. He's not responsible for 9/11. Cindy Sheehan can rot in hell.

 
At 18 January, 2010 16:28, Blogger Triterope said...

Cindy Sheehan is the living embodiment of the old George Carlin parody news story "A man has barricaded himself inside his house, however he is not armed and no one is paying any attention to him."

Her 15 minutes of occasional relevance ended in 2007. Now she's just another fringe loony, hanging around other fringe loonies, staging pointless and incompetent actions that are not at all about societal change and entirely about saying "Me! Me! Look at Me! I'm picketing Dick Cheney's house! I'm sooooooooo edgy! I'm a freedom fighter! Wooooooo! Send money! They're going to arrest me any minute now! Really! I swear! Wooooooo!"

 
At 18 January, 2010 16:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seriously... does Russia Today seek out all our nut-job dissidents? We have sane dissidents too but they don't seem too interested in them.

 
At 18 January, 2010 16:45, Anonymous Marc said...

Sheehan attended an anti-war ralley where a US Serviceman was hung in effigy. Then a year later her own son was killed in action. She cheered when the mock soldier was hung, so how outraged could she have been when her son came home in a flag-draped coffin.

Then she made her name by camping out in front of the President's ranch in Crawford, and demanding an audience with him. This in spite of the fact that she actually met with the President, face-to-face and even hugged the guy (yes, the evil Booosh met with thousands of families of the war's KIA privately. No cameras, just the families and him). Cindy had her chance to give the President what for, other mothers and fathers have done this, but Cindy jacked her chance. So she wanted a do-over.

Boohoo.

 
At 18 January, 2010 17:16, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Btw people could you remind me - was her son forced by the draft board to join the armed forces? Was he compelled by some judge or some mischievous recruiter? Or did he sign up voluntarily LIKE EVERYONE ELSE?

 
At 18 January, 2010 17:23, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Marc - I hadn't heard that about her actions before her son was killed - I'm looking for info. but can't find any - do you have a convenient link?

 
At 18 January, 2010 17:46, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Her 15 minutes of occasional relevance ended in 2007."

Actually, after the Presidential election.

Then the reactionary left dropped her, because she couldn't be used to beat up on President Bush anymore.

 
At 19 January, 2010 00:15, Blogger Pat said...

The sad thing is that her son, Casey, was an Eagle Scout, altar boy, and hero. A fine young man who was a credit to his country.

 
At 19 January, 2010 02:54, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'one woman loses her son in said war'

So did Rose Gentle (whose son, Gordon, was killed while serving with the British Army in Basra). Anyone who wants to see how a mother can grieve for a lost son, and campaign with dignity might want to check her example out.

 
At 19 January, 2010 04:41, Anonymous troyfromwv said...

Sheehan's only family family has shunned that ogorous looking thing.

 
At 19 January, 2010 08:22, Anonymous Pat Cowardly said...

"Ogorous", Troy? Not only are you illiterate, but LOOK WHO'S TALKING, you disgusting, misshapen, malcontent piece of racist, child-abusing shit.

 
At 19 January, 2010 08:40, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

"New Yorker" sure is a dim bulb,eh? In a thread pockmarked with insane woofing,this one tops them all:"...using her son's grave to piss on his grave and slander the country he fought for....".And then,of course,being as desperate and hapless as always,he trots out the "Jew hater" garbage.And,can someone inform the glib goofball that Hugo Chavez has won three elections over the last ten years,or so.

 
At 19 January, 2010 08:52, Anonymous New Yorker said...

"Ogorous", Troy? Not only are you illiterate, but LOOK WHO'S TALKING, you disgusting, misshapen, malcontent piece of racist, child-abusing shit.

Wow, this convinces me that 9/11 was an inside job. Great argument!

As for Spacebar Guy's idiocy, I'll just quote mother Sheehan herself:

"Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the army to protect America, not Israel."

Nope, nothing suggesting sinister Jews conspiring in that quote!

And yes, Hugo Chavez has won elections. So has Dmitry Medvedev. So has Hamid Karzai. So has Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. That doesn't make their countries democracies.

Here, try reading something that isn't a conspiracy site:

http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/fiw10/FIW_2010_Tables_and_Graphs.pdf

Note the countries with asterisks next to them. Those are electoral democracies. Every country in the Americas is an electoral democracy save two: Cuba and Venezuela.

 
At 19 January, 2010 09:30, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
"New Yorker" sure is a dim bulb,eh? In a thread pockmarked with insane woofing,this one tops them all:"...using her son's grave to piss on his grave and slander the country he fought for...."."


So what's wrong with that, Krazee? It is an EXACT description of that piece of shit's treason against America.

And you're supporting the piece of shit.

Makes one think.

 
At 19 January, 2010 09:51, Anonymous Pat Cowardly said...

"Wow, this convinces me that 9/11 was an inside job. Great argument!"

Nice try, Dorker. You lost the argument years ago, and haven't been trying since. You're a coward who flees from facts on here every day, and pretends he can 'debunk' things. I command you to continue to demonstrate this, on this and future threads. Of course you'll do exactly as I say.

 
At 19 January, 2010 10:09, Anonymous Roman Craig said...

Nice try, Dorker. You lost the argument years ago, and haven't been trying since. You're a coward who flees from facts on here every day, and pretends he can 'debunk' things. I command you to continue to demonstrate this, on this and future threads. Of course you'll do exactly as I say.

Says the poser pussy who pretended to be in the military.

Dick Cheney owns you Walt! That's sure got to suck.

 
At 19 January, 2010 10:11, Anonymous New Yorker said...

You lost the argument years ago, and haven't been trying since.

Um, what argument? If I've lost it, have you tried bringing it into court?

(Funny how this question never gets answered by the "truthers"....)

You're a coward who flees from facts on here every day, and pretends he can 'debunk' things.

False. I've never seen the "truth" movement present any facts here.

I command you to continue to demonstrate this, on this and future threads. Of course you'll do exactly as I say.

Nobody cares.

 
At 19 January, 2010 10:11, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'You lost the argument years ago, and haven't been trying since.'

Which is why President Sheehan has recently asked Congress to authorise the trial for crimes against humanity of former President George W. Bush, former Vice-President Dick Cheney, and a host of other former administration officials, with Senator Griffin and Representative Barrett leading the case for the prosecution ...

Oh dear.

'I command you to continue to demonstrate this ...'

Wow. Walt now thinks he's Darth Vader.

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:04, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

The Debunker Cult:they type,therefore they are! Only the increasingly unhinged "New Yorker" would twist Sheehan's quote into anti-Semitism.And you've pitched another winner onto the bonfire Bozo:"...Hamid Karzai was elected".Hoist on your own leotard there,dumbass! Anything coherent on Shaffer? Yet? At all? And then there's the ludicrous PornBoy. Yea,it's slander to criticize your government.You looked it up,right? Sir Bonehead,you have revealed yourself for what you are:a screeching fool!

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:11, Anonymous Troy Fellates Horses said...

"I command you to continue to demonstrate this, on this and future threads. Of course you'll do exactly as I say."

"Nobody cares."

Bingo! You're doing great, Yorker! Now flee from explaining how 7's 83 columns resisted, then lost all resistance, then started resisting again during the collapse. Were they just going flaccid, like Pat's 'debunking', or anything posted by Sword of Twoof?
I command ALL of you to flee in silent cowardice, or post something that doesn't even come close to an explanation, and pretend it's funny. Go!

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:25, Anonymous Shat Curley said...

I command ALL truthers to continue to post semi-literate screeds on this site in order to pwn the debunkers here because that's how we're going to win the war against the NWO!

The more times you demonstrate your appalling lack of knowledge of physics or engineering, the better!

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:27, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Now flee from explaining how 7's 83 columns resisted, then lost all resistance, then started resisting again during the collapse.

Controlled demolition in multiple stages.

Rats guys, the "truthers" have finally beaten us. What now?

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:40, Anonymous Pat Sewerly said...

"Rats guys, the "truthers" have finally beaten us. "

True, but it happened years ago. Now we just come here to laugh at your idiotic posts.

"The more times you demonstrate your appalling lack of knowledge of physics or engineering, the better!"

More appalling is that you flee from addressing any of those subjects WRT 9/11, otherwise you'd have posted your explanation years ago, Shat. At least your handle is appropriate, though.

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:44, Anonymous New Yorker said...

True, but it happened years ago. Now we just come here to laugh at your idiotic posts.

Funny, I would have guessed that if you had proof of the government murdering 3,000 of its own citizens, you'd want to do something about it since the perpetrators are still free. Instead, you're posting on the relatively obscure site of people you beat "years ago".

Hmm, where's that quote again?

"The great virtue of a fake conspiracy is that it calls on you to do nothing." - George Monbiot

 
At 19 January, 2010 11:57, Anonymous New Yorker said...

It's amusing how, when I listed people who won fraudulent elections, the only one Spacebar Guy chooses to dwell on is Karzai.

What about all the protests in the streets in Iran over the last 6 months? That election wasn't fraudulent, Spacebar Guy? Are those people in the streets of Qom (!!!) zionist collaborators?

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:10, Blogger Triterope said...

True, but it happened years ago. Now we just come here to laugh at your idiotic posts.

So you laugh at us on a blog while the world continues to believe what we believe, and the perpetrators of the greatest conspiracy in modern history get off scot free? Okay then.

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:14, Anonymous Mark Roberts, Coward. said...

"Funny, I would have guessed..."

Guessing is all you do, New Yorker. And don't worry about Monbiot and his silly rantings: just because you and he can't multi-task doesn't mean no one else can. We can track down the perps AND call you and your friends out as obvious fools. It's quite easy, actually.

So give us your detailed analysis of the collapse of WTC 7, New Yorker. How did NIST explain the gravitational acceleration that Shyam Sunder said was impossible? We're all waiting for the physics lesson you keep promising to give us. Otherwise, keep pissing on yourself while telling other people it's raining. It's fun to watch.

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:20, Anonymous New Yorker said...

And don't worry about Monbiot and his silly rantings: just because you and he can't multi-task doesn't mean no one else can.

Yes, I'm sure a renowned journalist is incapable of such things, especially compared to such a brave dissident as yourself.

We can track down the perps AND call you and your friends out as obvious fools. It's quite easy, actually.

I'm sure you can. I'm sure you're doing ALL you can to catch those responsible.

So give us your detailed analysis of the collapse of WTC 7, New Yorker. How did NIST explain the gravitational acceleration that Shyam Sunder said was impossible? We're all waiting for the physics lesson you keep promising to give us. Otherwise, keep pissing on yourself while telling other people it's raining. It's fun to watch.

I've told you already, it was blown up by controlled demolition on the orders of Dick Cheney. Now go find him, my valiant dissident! Bravely capture those who murdered in cold blood! Become a hero unlike anyone before in history!

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:39, Anonymous Mark "Fool" Roberts said...

"I've told you already, it was blown up by controlled demolition on the orders of Dick Cheney." -New Foreskin

Do you have proof of this, or are you simply being an idiot again?

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:44, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Do you have proof of this, or are you simply being an idiot again?

Of course I have proof! The problem is that I can't send it to you here because my identity would be compromised and I could get captured sent to a black site by the CIA for aiding and abetting the enemy. Why do you think I haven't created an identity on this blog?

We'll have to find another way to communicate if you want the information. It also won't come cheap. I mean, I'm not going to risk my life if I'm not going to get paid off like the FDNY did.

 
At 19 January, 2010 12:56, Anonymous New Yorker said...

I'd also like to mention that the reason that WTC 7 had to be destroyed was that Salomon Smith Barney had documents showing how the Bilderberg Group had shorted the stock of Enron and Wordlcom in order to illegally profit from the fraud those companies were perpetrating.

Now, the normal scenario is to shred the documents, but the shredder broke that day, so they had to go with the emergency backup plan: wire the building for demolition, and then fly two jetliners into the Twin Towers across the street in order to have them collapse and set WTC 7 on fire (conveniently burning all the papers that needed to be shredded), and then when the all-clear signal was given, detonate the charges.

I'm finally having a crisis of conscience, so I'm spilling the beans in spite of the grave danger it's putting me in. You have to be brave sometimes.

 
At 19 January, 2010 13:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NY's role-playing is a healthy development. Notice how more lucid he is when putting forth a narrative he tells himself is just a satire than he is in his debunking mode.

 
At 19 January, 2010 14:03, Anonymous New Yorker said...

NY's role-playing is a healthy development.

Fantasy stories are fun to create. Some people take it too far, however. I mean, you've got grown men dressing like Darth Vader or Klingons, and you've got grown men who believe Richard Gage.

Maybe you'd be better off writing Star Trek novels, Petgoat? At least then you'd have more fans than Willie Rodriguez does.

Notice how more lucid he is when putting forth a narrative he tells himself is just a satire than he is in his debunking mode.

Seek professional help, Petgoat. Then get to work on your Star Trek novel. Who knows, you might actually earn enough money to move out of your parents' basement!

 
At 19 January, 2010 14:27, Anonymous Chet Ripley said...

"Who knows, you might actually earn enough money to move out of your parents' basement!"

First things first - a patch kit for his blow up doll takes priority.

 
At 19 January, 2010 14:50, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'We can track down the perps AND call you and your friends out as obvious fools. It's quite easy, actually.'

You haven't exactly had much joy over the past 8 1/2 years ...

 
At 19 January, 2010 16:18, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

'We can track down the perps."

When's the trial?

 
At 19 January, 2010 16:54, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about grown men who paint themselves like The Joker and carry megaphones with which to harass armed police officers?

 
At 20 January, 2010 07:30, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

"...with which to harass armed police officers"! Nobody whines like the Debunker Cult.Jeepers,Guys.Do you all have Thomas Jefferson dartboards too?

 
At 20 January, 2010 09:58, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"the Debunker Cult"

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

 
At 20 January, 2010 12:53, Blogger pomeroo said...

Jee-sus, conspiracy liars are stupid!

Not one of these morons has so much as glanced at the NIST reports, but they keep right on babbling. Watch them vanish:

TELL US, DUNCES, WHY NO PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS HAVE APPEARED ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD POINTING OUT NIST'S ERRORS OF SCIENCE.

Speak up--we can't hear you.

 
At 20 January, 2010 13:20, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Poor,poor pitiful all in caps Pom Pom Girl,the real question is:where are the all the papers debunking the Jones/Harritt study? Oh yea,Sackdoily and Billman took care of that one!! My bad!

 
At 20 January, 2010 14:50, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
Poor,poor pitiful all in caps Pom Pom Girl,the real question is:where are the all the papers debunking the Jones/Harritt study? Oh yea,Sackdoily and Billman took care of that one!! My bad!"

Can someone translate these moronic babblings into Sane, please?

 
At 20 January, 2010 17:27, Blogger Triterope said...

where are the all the papers debunking the Jones/Harritt study?

As soon as they submit it to peer review, they'll get one.

 
At 21 January, 2010 10:31, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'where are the all the papers debunking the Jones/Harritt study?'

I don't even think that anyone in the academic scientific community has even bothered to read it. They seem to have better things to do with their time.

 
At 21 January, 2010 10:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think you're right. They can argue "the liberal media would report on it if there were anything to it" even though deep down they know the notion that the corporate media are liberal is absurd. Still it makes a good excuse.

 
At 21 January, 2010 11:38, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"....deep down they know the notion that the corporate media are liberal is absurd."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!

Cut it out, I'm getting a stich from laughing.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!

 
At 21 January, 2010 15:16, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not going to argue the myth of the "lieberal media" with an ideologue.

 
At 21 January, 2010 16:27, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

PornBoy must be the illegitimate son of Tom DeLay.I mean,if you're going to be a white trash Bozo you may as well go all the way!

 
At 22 January, 2010 08:29, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
PornBoy must be the illegitimate son of Tom DeLay."

assholio is talking to the voices in his head again.

 
At 25 January, 2010 16:35, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

I guess Shyte and Billman are working on their review of the Jones/Harritt paper.And those are exploding paint chips,by the way.

 
At 25 January, 2010 20:48, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well don't expect me to read Shyte and Mallbin's "paper" until it's published in Science magazine.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home