Wednesday, July 28, 2010

A Truther History of Debates

Over two years ago Mark Roberts from the JREF Forum debated ae911 founder Richard Gage, an event which despite their bravado did not merit a mention in any truther source I could find. Now it finally is brought up in this history of 9/11 conspiracy debates on the ae911 website.



Roberts could barely contain his hostility towards Gage, accusing him of lying several times and impugning his motives. The ill will Roberts brings to the discussion is evident in many of his online posts where he goes by the name of “Gravy.” One such post on a James Randi Educational Forum refers to “Gage and his gang of lazy, lying, despicable creeps,” which indicates that he doesn’t just disagree with his opposition; he despises them.


The article also points out that, unwittingly I presume, that despite Gage's constant claim to be a scientist and not a conspiracy theorist, he stills buys into all the long ago debunked truther kool aid.

Shermer opened saying he thought the government’s official inquiries did a fairly good job and argued that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda said they did it and intended to do it again. Gage, uncharacteristically took the bait this time and countered that the photograph did not look at all like bin Laden and that Bin Laden claimed that he it was not responsible.


Nevermind that this was long ago shown to be an issue of the conversion of the video between PAL and NTSC.

And believe it or not, Gage does a David Ray Griffin and insists the hijackers are still alive.

Coiro asked about the possibility of the planes having been remotely controlled. Gage said it was possible but beyond the scope of AE911Truth. He mentioned the named suspects who turned up alive after being accused of murder and suicide. On this point Shermer revealed a dismissive approach to what Gage was saying. Shermer said Americans easily confuse Middle Eastern names and that those people were all dead. “That claim has been looked into. None of those people have been interviewed,” Shermer said.

BBC, however, carried a story that said an accused hijacker, Waleed Al Shehri, was protesting the accusation in Morocco and has talked with journalists.


The BBC, however, also carried a story in which they corrected their earlier inaccurate one.

Labels:

168 Comments:

At 28 July, 2010 07:30, Anonymous Portly's Alleged Hunger said...

Here's Pat doing his best to sound REALLY stupid, and succeeding only in telling us that his mind is on junkfood again:

"Yeah it’s it’s kind of an oddball movement you know I mean, uh as I as I put it one time you know I mean uh.. uh suppose you had a bunch of people and- and- and- one group of people like chocolate ice cream and 1 group of people like uh vanilla ice cream and 1 group of people like strawberry ice cream, well, you know I mean the only way to get ‘em together is to call yourselves the ice cream movement." -Pat Cowardly

"Like any movement there is diversity" -JamesB

so which is it, boys? 'Like any movement', or 'oddball' like Curley's Ice Cream fantasy? Make up your alleged minds! You know, I mean...

 
At 28 July, 2010 07:41, Anonymous TROYFROMWV said...

kook

 
At 28 July, 2010 08:01, Anonymous Troy the Tubby Tranny said...

Count on Troy the cellblock bitch for an intelligent answer every time, huh, Pat?

You're a mental colossus, Troy. People take you seriously. Really.

"Looks like Troy is vindicated" -GuitarBile

"Troy is my buddy from West Virginia"
-Pat Cowardly.

 
At 28 July, 2010 08:57, Anonymous troyfromwv said...

Paranoid kook

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:05, Anonymous Pat's Buddies are Smart said...

"Paranoid kook"
-TroyTheYeastVagina

Don't trip over all those syllables, genius.

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:08, Anonymous troy said...

kook

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:25, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"One such post on a James Randi Educational Forum refers to “Gage and his gang of lazy, lying, despicable creeps,” which indicates that he doesn’t just disagree with his opposition; he despises them."

Sounds like a really, really smart man.

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:28, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"so which is it, boys? 'Like any movement', or 'oddball' like Curley's Ice Cream fantasy? Make up your alleged minds! You know, I mean..."


The fantasy of teleological narrative is comparable with the linguistic construction of disinterested observation, but your tortured obsession with the relationship between the fantasy of teleological narrative and the linguistic construction of disinterested observation is fortuitous.

Every mixed attitude aligns the illogical incident.

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:42, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

More proof that Paddy and the other idiot get paid per thread.Jeepers,Boyos,why don't you just take out a full page ad that says:"We are haters,slanderers and nutjobs...and proud of it"!

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:42, Anonymous Pat Loves to Lie to You said...

Pat Curley: the melted iron could 'easly' have come from cutting torches during the clean-up...

BillyGoatBile: RJ Lee are truthers; It was the pumice and fly ash. "Fire alone cannot account for 10,000 tons of sphere." (whatever that means) and no, I can't point to a source that states this. It's all speculation

RJ Lee Report: (after actually testing the evidence) the spheres came from iron that melted during the WTC Event.

What's the cohesive narrative, dolts? Make up your alleged minds!

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:52, Blogger Billman said...

You do realize James posted this, not Pat, right dumbass?

 
At 28 July, 2010 09:57, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What's the matter, Brian? Are you still smarting from the ass kicking you took yesterday? Apparently, you're so punch drunk that all you can do is misrepresent my argument. Should we expect less from a pathological liar with the reading comprehension skills of a second grader? Probably not.

Do yourself a favor and ask your physician for Thorazine.

 
At 28 July, 2010 10:28, Anonymous James Fears the Facts said...

"You do realize James posted this, not Pat, right dumbass?" -Shillman

Yes, and JamesB also said that 9/11 caused 'the destruction of half of lower Manhattan'. You probably believe him, too. What's your source, James?

"...will you please come over and fuck my sister?" -Bileman

 
At 28 July, 2010 10:33, Anonymous Too Hungry to Think said...

"I'm not apprehensiveness (SIC), I think we all know what happened today (SIC)...you know, I mean..." -Pat Cowardly.

mmmmmm.... Ice Cream.......

 
At 28 July, 2010 11:10, Anonymous troyfromwestva said...

bat-crap crazy

 
At 28 July, 2010 11:13, Anonymous troyfromwv said...

Nathan Moulton seems to have moved on from Inside Jobby Job Twoof. He appears to have found a new hobby which is beat-boxin or sumpin.

It's a "war" in your feeble mind you can't win.

Be like Nathan. Conceed you've wasted years of your life and try a new hobby... or at least go outside and wake up the sheeple.

 
At 28 July, 2010 11:21, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

so which is it, boys? 'Like any movement', or 'oddball' like Curley's Ice Cream fantasy? Make up your alleged minds! You know, I mean...

Those aren't mutually exclusive. David Ray Griffin shits like any person, but he's also an oddball.

 
At 28 July, 2010 11:36, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Mark Fuckin' Lane.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!!!!!

 
At 28 July, 2010 12:14, Anonymous Pat's Idiotic Speeches said...

"Conceed (SIC) you've wasted years..."

Troy the Tranny slouches up and belches forth nonsense and spelling errors. Again. Almost too easy to mock.

Work a little harder, TrollInPat'sVagina. You know, I mean...mmmmmmm...ice cream....

 
At 28 July, 2010 12:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Oh my goodness. The ass kicking you took yesterday has you in lather, doesn't it, psychopath?

Poor baby, cry me a river.

%^)

 
At 28 July, 2010 12:54, Anonymous Pat's PumIce Cream said...

Poor GB...Still looking for someone take his frantic hand-waving seriously. Kind of like a drowning victim.

At least he can cite himself as a scientific source, though. Maybe Pat and James can learn from that kind of scholarly attitude. You know, I mean...

 
At 28 July, 2010 13:04, Blogger Billman said...

TrollInPat'sVagina... that was actually a pretty clever nickname there. Heh. Sorry. It made me laugh.

 
At 28 July, 2010 13:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...TrollInPat'sVagina."

Billman,

Brian's jealous because he's never seen or been inside a vagina. And that includes birth. After all, Brian Good is an asshole baby.

%^)

 
At 28 July, 2010 13:26, Anonymous troyfromwv said...

I guess when the real World laughs at you all the time you finally give up, you go inside, turn on the computer, and make the equivalent of fart jokes on this blog.

You're a kook.

 
At 28 July, 2010 13:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Poor GB...Still looking for someone take his frantic hand-waving seriously. Kind of like a drowning victim."

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, delusional one.

Keep working on it, and someday you'll encounter something called reality

(Don't hold your breath, folks)

The psychopath whines, "...At least he can cite himself as a scientific source, though. Maybe Pat and James can learn from that kind of scholarly attitude. You know, I mean..."

Allow me to clue you in, scat muncher.

Now, pay attention, okay oatmeal-for-brains, because this might be a little complicated for an unemployed former janitor.

Eight years in academia prepared me for something you can only dream of--now, pay attention: I learned to think for myself.

Try it sometime (or...maybe not).

%^)

 
At 28 July, 2010 13:46, Anonymous GB's Brains on Pumice said...

"America can kiss my ass"
Troy Sexton--Scholar, gentleman, and public intellectual (to GB).

"I learned to think for myself, but only after I spent 8 years in academia" -GB

Congratulations. I know graduating the 8th grade can be tough.
In the future, though, you won't be able to cite yourself as a scholarly resource. You'll have to refer to the work of real scientists, son. High School and college can be rough like that.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Clearly, the intrepid Brian Good doesn't know the definition of the word academia.

"...Academia, Acadème, or the Academy are collective terms for the community of students and scholars engaged in higher education and research."

Source: Wikipedia: Academia.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: If you don't know the meaning of a word--you retard--don't use it.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:07, Anonymous 30 Days in the Clink said...

"Looks like Troy is vindicated" -BillyGoatBile

"Troy is my buddy from West Virginia" -Pat Cowardly

"Fuck America" -Troy Sexton

"America can kiss my ass..."
-Troy Sexton, Hero and Idol to Pat, James, and G-Bile.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:09, Anonymous GB idolizes Troyfromwv said...

GB: '...blah blah blah education and research.'

Hmmm...better go back to school and learn how to source your silly claims. Maybe another 8 years will do it...maybe not.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian, here's another word to look up (because it describes you so well): acephalic

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Hmmm...better go back to school and learn how to source your silly claims. Maybe another 8 years will do it...maybe not."

It's not my fault that you refuse to read the hyperlinks I provide for you. That's your responsibility, cretin.

From Dr. Hare's Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R):

[8] Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Yup, as per the classic definition of psychopathy.

Good work, fruit loop.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:37, Anonymous Scholars say "jizzmop" said...

What's the over/under on when GB will appeal to his own authority again?
Any action on this? What? No one cares about GB and his nonsense? Wow, that's harsh...

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:41, Anonymous A.V.Express said...

Was the stupid "Git's" implosion filmed and televised,because I missed it.Anything on youtube.com yet? Keep me posted.Best,Arhoolie

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Everyone's familiar with the old adage, You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

Here's a new one for you, Brian.

You can lead a troofer to academia, but you can't make him think.

%^)

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:45, Anonymous Goatboy The Clever said...

"Here's a new one for you, Brian.

You can lead a troofer to academia, but you can't make him think."
-GuitPlagiarizer

a "new" one, huh? I'm sure you find it very original, but your idol Ray Comfort may disagree. Is that what you learned in Academia? To copying others' work and pass it off as your own? I guess if you can't cite yourself, plagiarize someone else to sound clever...

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:46, Anonymous Pat Wishes U would go said...

Plagiarism, self-citation, and "Jizzmop" is all you have, GB.

Go play with Troy the Vindicated.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The pathological liar scribbles, "...a "new" one, huh? I'm sure you find it very original, but your idol Ray Comfort may disagree. Is that what you learned in Academia? To copying others' work and pass it off as your own? I guess if you can't cite yourself, plagiarize someone else to sound clever..."

I didn't plagiarize anyone, and here's the proof:

Source: Google: Proof that you're desperate, Brian.

No results found for "You can lead a troofer to academia, but you can't make him think."

Let's try another search, shall we?

"You can lead a idiot to academia, but you can't make him think."

Google: More proof that you're a liar, Brian.

No results found for "You can lead a idiot to academia, but you can't make him think."

Poor Brian, you just can't get a break, can you?

Poor desperate troofer, cry me a river.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:53, Anonymous Everyone Reading This said...

"I guess if you can't cite yourself, plagiarize someone else to sound clever..."

Oh SNAP, that must have hurt.

 
At 28 July, 2010 14:54, Anonymous Pat the Referee said...

You've lost badly, GB. Time to re-string your life.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Still patting yourself on the back without justification, psychopath?

As I said before, Brian Good is a lying invertebrate who can cross his ankle's behind his earlobes.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So Brian, take a break from your hectic masturbation schedule and explain to us how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Go for it, 'tard. After all, I'm always looking for a laugh.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:10, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Oh, I suppose you need a source for Jones claim, right Pinocchio?

Steven Jones wrote, "...Scaling to the 110-story WTC towers, roughly 1300 lbs [590 kg] of explosives per tower would suffice."

Source: journalof911studies.com: Why did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:12, Anonymous GuitarBruised and Beat said...

"...the thesis--"controlled demolition of building 7 and 'free fall acceleration'"--is Box Boy's, and Box Boy's alone."

I don't suppose you have a source for this insanely ridiculous and stupid claim? I mean, besides your obese ass, where the other claims come from/

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:13, Anonymous no one cares, GB said...

"will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere." GuitarBloviation

That's a pretty big sphere, billy. where did you find it?

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's right, Brian, when your back's against the wall, CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

So enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

Go for it, Mr. Junior College drop out.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...That's a pretty big sphere, billy. where did you find it?"

I didn't "find it", Jones pulled it out of your @$$.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:21, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian, are you still working on the meaning of the word of?

I guess it all depends on how you define "of".

"...I didn't have sexual relations with that iron-rich sphere." -- Brian Good

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:36, Anonymous GuiturdBalls The Oafish said...

More cleverness and originality from Pat's favorite comedian: GuiTurdBoil the rape fantasist.

Would it kill you to stay on topic, TurdBalls? People are trying to have an honest debate here.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:40, Anonymous GB Debunked by Pat? said...

"The iron microspheres reported in the RJ Lee report could easily have been caused by the steelworkers using acetylene torches on the steel during the rescue operation."
-Pat Cowardly

GoatBile: Pat never cited a source for this, and couldn't produce any type of mechanism for how it was possible. Yet it contradicts your statements completely. Is he wrong, or is he just a new source, like you? Would someone make up their alleged mind?

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:42, Anonymous Facts are Flexible 2 U said...

Is he wrong, or is he just a new source, like you? Would someone make up their alleged mind? -I.M. Brilliant

"Like any movement there is diversity" -JamesB

oooh. I see. Thanks, JamesBitch!

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Would it kill you to stay on topic, TurdBalls? People are trying to have an honest debate here."

Actually, Onan, you pulled the thread off topic here.

(That would be the first post to the thread, by the way).

Apparently, you're suffering from Alzheimer's disease in addition to psychopathy.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath whines, "...Yet it contradicts your statements completely. Is he wrong, or is he just a new source, like you? Would someone make up their alleged mind?"

I don't know, Onan.

Ask someone who cares.

So enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:50, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

My goodness, brian is getting desperate, isn't it?

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Pat and James,

I didn't ask you to ban this clown, Brian Good, without cause.

I think it's clear that Brian Good intends to trash every thread with off-topic nonsense.

It's your blog; however, I wouldn't put up with this BS for a microsecond.

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:53, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LL wrote, "...My goodness, brian is getting desperate, isn't it?"

I think I've driven janitor boy stark raving mad.

What a pity.

%^)

 
At 28 July, 2010 15:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another full day of work for
Guitard Bill. Where does he find the time?

 
At 28 July, 2010 16:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath whines, "...Another full day of work for
Guitard Bill. Where does he find the time?"


That's easy to answer: I multitask and I'm massively parallel (that's a computer science thing, you wouldn't understand).

Have you ever heard of a browser tab?

Try it sometime, Onan.

Have you ever heard of a database, Onan?

Never mind, your head is likely to explode...

 
At 28 July, 2010 16:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thats it, you multi-task.
Yeah, yeah,Thats the ticket!!
Guy, if youre anything like the homos over at the JREF. I know your full of shit. They complain about saving a few bucks by going to TAM.
I`m thinking people with money wouldnt worry about an extra 2 dollars per drink. What you say?

 
At 28 July, 2010 16:10, Blogger 胡維倫 said...

大肚能容,了卻人間多少事,滿腔歡喜,笑開天下古今愁。..................................................

 
At 28 July, 2010 16:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Don't ask me. After all, I don't frequent JREF.

So enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

 
At 28 July, 2010 16:34, Anonymous Marc said...

The RJ Lee report backs up none of your claims, Brian, not a single one.

You are an idiot.

 
At 28 July, 2010 17:16, Blogger Triterope said...

TrollInPat'sVagina... that was actually a pretty clever nickname there. Heh. Sorry. It made me laugh.

I'm with you on that one. Of course, they followed it up with 29 un-clever nicknames. These people never know when to stop.

 
At 28 July, 2010 17:26, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"These people never know when to stop."

Which is why assholio is always buying new keyboards.

 
At 28 July, 2010 19:25, Anonymous Amoron said...

Why are all of us troofers complete idiots?

 
At 28 July, 2010 22:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeez, if people didn't think all truthers were idiots before they read this fuckin' guy's comments, they sure would after.

 
At 29 July, 2010 01:44, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why were 5 Mossad agents celebrating the attacks?

makker

 
At 29 July, 2010 03:02, Anonymous slingblade said...

GuitarBill said...
Clearly, the intrepid Brian Good doesn't know the definition of the word academia.

"...Academia, Acadème, or the Academy are collective terms for the community of students and scholars engaged in higher education and research."

Source: Wikipedia: Academia.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: If you don't know the meaning of a word--you retard--don't use it.

come on now, that's never stopped any of you jackholes from providing the world with verifiable proof of your idiocy every time you "debunk"

 
At 29 July, 2010 03:27, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Why were 5 Mossad agents celebrating the attacks?

makker"

They didn't.

 
At 29 July, 2010 04:30, Anonymous the real chief james said...

Lazarus Long said...
"Anonymous said...
Why were 5 Mossad agents celebrating the attacks?

makker"

They didn't.

sure they did, and thats how proper debunking is done

 
At 29 July, 2010 05:51, Anonymous GuitarPumiceVolcano said...

"Pat and James,
I didn't ask you to ban this clown, Brian Good, without cause...I wouldn't put up with this BS..."
-GoatBile

Even the wambulance couldn't handle how much of a pussy GB is, so they kicked him to the curb. The least they could do is come to a full stop first...

 
At 29 July, 2010 05:58, Anonymous Just another day at SLC said...

Typical "debate" with GuiturdBloviation:

Rational Poster: The RJ Lee report clearly states that the melted iron in the WTC dust came from the WTC event.

GB (giddy): PROVE THAT PUMICE DOESN'T COME FROM VOLCANOES!!!

RP: Just read the RJ Lee report. They worked with the dust.

GB (shooting spittle): TELL ME THAT INCINERATORS DON'T PRODUCE IRON!!!

RP: It's all there, tough guy.

GB (frothing now): PROVE THAT STEVEN JONES IS CORRECT WITH HIS CLAIM, AND PRETEND I DIDN'T JUST CHANGE THE SUBJECT, JIZZMOP PSYCHOPATH!!!!!! I'M ACCUSING YOU OF CHANGING THE SUBJECT!!!! GO PLAY IN THE FREEWAY!!!! FREEWAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! WAAAAAAH!!!!


Pat, James, David Shyte and Shillman: Wow, great work, GluttonBile. You really handed him his ass. Group Hug!

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian, you're a fucking idiot.

Is misrepresenting my argument all you have, psychopath?

Pathetic.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pat and James,

I didn't ask you to ban this clown, Brian Good, without cause.

I think it's clear that Brian Good intends to trash every thread with off-topic nonsense.

It's your blog; however, I wouldn't put up with this BS for a microsecond.


First off, blogger commenting moderation doesn't offer this function for ip's, last I checked. It could be different now, but hey, you and facts have always had a troublesome "relationship", haven't they, Billy Boy. When will you make up your alleged mind about the ATM paper? Will you at least try to settle on a single discernable lie to handwave it?

Wait, are you still claiming, as you foolishly did, that the SEM equipment Farrer used is unable to detect oxygen? I didn't hear an apology for that foolhardy lie yet. I remember you being smacked down hard on that one, despite all your embarrassing chutzpah. Nor for the lie that Jones didn't find elemental aluminum, but aluminum oxide. They didn't, but who cares, in the land of Bill, falsehoods flow like the Mississippi River.

At this point, you're a fully automated crap machine, aren't you. Let's see some more of your bovine excrement, Billy Boy. Where's that paper you promised to publish and/or finance? Are you really that much of a loser?

Second, did somebody call the Wambulance yet?

Not only are you a compulsive liar, who broadly overestimates his own skill set, you're an attention whore and an outright pussy.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:29, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian,

Go fuck yourself.

And when you're done, liar, enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Now, get to work, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:30, Anonymous Twat Squirrely the Cunt said...

"...you're an attention whore and an outright pussy."

OUCH...And that wasn't even my post. Looks like Bill's patently obvious whining and distracting tactics are clear to everyone now.

Time to go back to playing in the volcano, BillyGoatBile, before you humiliate yourself again.
('but I'm a SCIENTIST!!')

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:31, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath whines, "...Not only are you a compulsive liar, who broadly overestimates his own skill set, you're an attention whore and an outright pussy."

Projecting again, Brian?

Projection. is a big word, Brian, look it up, Okay numb nuts?

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here we go again, Brian Good is holding another sock puppet fest.

Pick a handle and stick to it, fucktard.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:33, Anonymous Pat Poet, Dumbonker said...

"enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass."

Cut/Paste Cut/Paste, spam spam spam,
Curley's lackey is a sham,
Posts his shit and makes no case,
Then whines and cries and wastes this space.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And remember, Brian, as long as Jones' iron-rich spheres contain K, Si and Ca, they are not the byproduct of a thermitic reaction. (see page 19 of Jones' paper, figure 16).

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian,

Enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Now, get to work, psychopath.

Go for it, because I'll rip you to shreds.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't care about the numbers you pull out of your cornhole, Billy Boy. As you know, your track record SUCKS. You haven't published your paper. The onus probandi is on YOU. Now get to work. Do the math. I'm sure the "pay-for-play" publishers at Bentham will be thrilled with your "calculations". You promised Bill. Don't renege on that promise. Ta-tah!

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here's your source, dingbat, now claim that Jones never made such a claim.

Go for it, liar.

Steven Jones wrote, "...Scaling to the 110-story WTC towers, roughly 1300 lbs [590 kg] of explosives per tower would suffice."

Source: journalof911studies.com: Why did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:39, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I've answered all your questions, and all you have is evasion and changing the subject.

Now, answer the questions, psychopath.

Enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Now, get to work, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

In fact, I've asked you to answer dozens of questions, and what is your response?

*crickets*

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wait, did you just post FIVE reactions in desperation, asking all kinds of questions, STILL operating under the delusion that any of us care? Quod erat demonstrandum, you are an attention whore. And you're clearly desperate. MEK cleaned chips, Billy Boy. After that, none of the elements you name as mutually exclusive with the (nano)thermite discovered show up above background noise levels.

But hey. Bill and facts. Facts and Bill. A long saga of disappointment and disillusionment. Have fun. I came back and saw shit's still the same. All talk and no juice. If anybody's going to debunk the paper, it's not going to be you. Sorry.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:42, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You're worthless, Brian.

Now, answer my questions, or I'm relegating you to ridicule pile.

You're a joke--a charlatan.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's not an answer, gay boy.

Now, answer the questions, psychopath.

Enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Now, get to work, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Defend your man, Jones, or fuck off, sod.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:47, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And when you're done, explain the K, Si and Ca in Jones sample?

Get to work, charlatan.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:48, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In fact, I've asked you to answer dozens of questions, and what is your response?

Partially or mostly consumed nanothermite chips found in WTC dust. Chips are ignited by Mark Basile, and notices that NEW iron-rich microspheres are formed ON THE SPOT. Ergo: thermitic reaction occurred. Do you get this simple deductive logic, Billy Boy? No you don't.

Why don't you just get down to it? Either you lie, or Basile, Jones, Harrit and Keogh lie. It's that simple. Ridiculous "questions" composed with fabricated numbers notwithstanding. (Hint: if there is any merit to your argument, and there isn't, that would only mean there are also microspheres of different origin in the dust, who don't show the XEDS peaks that DO associate with nanothermite, quelle surprise)

Yawn Bill. Double yawn. Triple yawn.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:52, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"And when you're done, explain the K, Si and Ca in Jones sample?"

Another signature Billy Boy tactic: pretend your question wasn't answered. It's fortunate I don't accept that 9/11 was a big lie merely because of your extreme lack of credibility Billy Boy, because if that were the only criterion, you'd be our very best PR asset.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:55, Blogger Troy said...

kook

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's not an answer, gay boy.

And pretending that you answered my question and posting un-sourced lies doesn't cut it, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyways, debating a pathological liar is a fool's errand. That much is clear. I only commented specifically to point out how shamelessly you resort to lies, or simply advertise your extreme ignorance and blinding hatred, by straight up LYING again, this time about the capabilities of modern SEM equipment. This could go on in perpetuity. I'm not going to beat a dead horse Bill. Enjoy your little "debunker" gaggle. What a bunch of pseudoskeptic, ideologically driven losers.

 
At 29 July, 2010 07:58, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Partially or mostly consumed nanothermite chips found in WTC dust."

LOL!

That's rich.

Now, answer the questions, psychopath.

Enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Now, get to work, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Anyways, debating a pathological liar is a fool's errand."

Projecting again, Brian?

Projection, is a big word, Brian, look it up, Okay numb nuts?

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So, when will you explain the K, Si and Ca in Jones sample?

Get to work, charlatan.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh you want a source? I'll give you a source:

"The abundant iron-rich spheres are of particular interest in this study; none were observed in these particular chips prior to DSC-heating."

ATM paper, pg. 19.

Explain it please? Either this is a lie or it means a thermitic reaction occurred. Which is it Bill?

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Since the fires cannot produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere, the remaining sphere had to come from somewhere else.

Where did the remaining spheres come from, gay boy?

Hurry, change the subject, gay boy.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Now, answer the questions, psychopath."

They were. [answered]. Typical Billy Boy strategy: pretend your question wasn't answered.

I'm going to allow you ONE attempt to answer MY question. If you don't, we are done. How's that Billy Boy? =)

Because that is the one question you can never answer. And you know it. Peace out, you bum.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Trying to hold Jones fraudulent paper up as "evidence" again, fool?

The paper was not properly peer reviewed. Jones submitted his paper to biased troofers--Harrit, Legge, Ryan, Farrer, etc.--and fraudulently referred to this as silliness as a "peer review process." Put simply, this is not a "peer review process", it's a circle jerk.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:06, Anonymous Arhoolie Destroys the "Git" said...

Wait,is yet another crazy fellow from the Debunker Cult whining and moaning about banning people from this site? And was it the maniacal and wacky Gitfiddler? Is it just another pesky coincidence that everytime a cultist has his ass handed to him he flashes the "ban card"? Jeepers,guy,get your head examined before you strangle your wife and daughters.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...They were. [answered]."

More bald-faced lies, gay boy?

Links please. (He can't provide links, because he's lying again)

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:08, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's not an answer, gay boy.

You're a fraud and a liar.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:11, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath whines, "...Wait,is yet another crazy fellow from the Debunker Cult whining and moaning about banning people from this site? And was it the maniacal and wacky Gitfiddler?"

I've already proven that you're a thread hijacking troll. Look at the first post to this thread. That's all the proof I need.

Now, answer my questions, fraud.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see. As predicted, you can't answer the question, and you start nattering about how you never trusted the paper in the first place. Isn't that correct, Billy Boy?

WELL THEN DON'T DEBATE IT YOU AIRPORT TOILET TOE TAPPING IMBECILE.

We are done. LOL. CYA!

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Since the fires cannot produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere, the remaining sphere had to come from somewhere else.

Where did the remaining spheres come from, gay boy?

Hurry, change the subject, gay boy.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's not an answer, fraud. And I don't see any links to back your claim, gay boy.

And that's proof positive that you're a liar.

So, when will you explain the K, Si and Ca in Jones sample?

Get to work, charlatan.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Brian's answer?

*crickets*

You're a fraud.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...I see. As predicted, you can't answer the question, and you start nattering about how you never trusted the paper in the first place. Isn't that correct, Billy Boy?"

Oh, I see. You can make all the demands you like, but when I ask questions, all I get are...

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

Hypocrite.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yo Brian,

Are you still working on the definition of the word academia, Mr. Junior College dropout?

Don't you have a toilet bowl to scrub, Mr. unemployed janitor.

Oh, that's right, your brain is already washed.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:26, Anonymous Arhoolie "Solitary" Vanunu said...

The only thing you've proven is that you're a certifiable lunatic,a real chickenshit and constantly just plain insanely wrong,jackoff.Lay off the nose candy,Goober.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:26, Anonymous BildoGuitarlatan said...

Stop the madness already, BillyBot. You're bleeding all over this thread, and Pat is trying to have a rational discussion here:

"...you know I mean uh.. uh suppose you had a bunch of people and- and- and- one group of people like chocolate ice cream and 1 group of people like uh vanilla ice cream and 1 group of people like strawberry ice cream, well, you know I mean..." -Pat the Coward

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...The abundant iron-rich spheres are of particular interest in this study; none were observed in these particular chips prior to DSC-heating."

Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001.

Moreover, no one can reproduce Jones' results. And I noticed that your Mark Basile nonsense is--gasp--un-sourced.

You'd lie to your live-in mother if you thought you could derive some advantage from the lie.

Pathetic.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, '...Stop the madness already, BillyBot. You're bleeding all over this thread, and Pat is trying to have a rational discussion here:"

According to whom? A pathological liar?

So, when will you cease the evasion and answer my questions, gay boy?

And I'm waiting for the sources to back your unsubstantiated claims, fraud.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I'm waiting for the sources, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Is that all you have? Un-sourced nonsense, bald-faced lies, STONEWALLING tactics and evasion?

And you call this "debate"?

Pathetic.

You're a troll--pure and simple.

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

There you have it, folks. When I challenge Brian Good to produce a source, what do I get?

You know the answer.

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

 
At 29 July, 2010 08:51, Anonymous Billy's Guitar Smashed said...

"Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001."
Source?

BillyGuitarlatan is doing the bumble and stumble all night long. Go Billy Go!

And there are now at least 3 "Brians" that the boy is shadow-boxing, and I don't think any of them are actually Brian Good. Poor Billy.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:02, Blogger GuitarBill said...

That's not an answer, Brian.

Conclusion: Its internet day at Agnews State Hospital.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:05, Blogger GuitarBill said...

So, when will you explain the K, Si and Ca in Jones sample?

Would you care to enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Squirm, Brian, squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

FACT: You can lie about the RJ Lee Report until you're blue in the face, but you can't produce one word from the report that supports your propaganda.

So, where's your "evidence", psychopath?

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:17, Anonymous GBilly the Whining Bitch said...

GB: "Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001."

Rational Poster: Source?

GB (spitting up): THAT'S NOT AN ANSWER!! YOU LOSE!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAH!! I WANT TO TALK ABOUT JONES!!!!

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:29, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Show me where "nanothermite" has been demonstrated cutting structural steel?

"Nanothermite" isn't even remotely suitable for the task.

To suggest that "nanothermite" is suitable to topple skyscrapers, is absurd.

Source: llnl.gov: Explosive aerogels.

Read the paper, because it proves that "nanothermites" heat content is so small as to be unsuitable for the task of "controlled demolition".

Burning through 70 ksi steel columns? You're out of your mind.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:36, Anonymous Billy BumbleBitch said...

GB: "Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001."

Rational Poster: "Source?"

GB:""Nanothermite" isn't even remotely suitable for the task."

Clearly you were caught in a lie again, and now you've been exposed, again. How mortifying for you...

Again.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Read the paper, and stop babbling, jackass.

(Too many big words for you, Junior College dropout?)

Simpson wrote, "...Energetic materials are made in two ways. The first is by physically mixing solid oxidizers and fuels, a process that, in its basics, has remained virtually unchanged for centuries. Such a process results in a composite energetic material such as black powder. The second process involves creating a monomolecular energetic material, such as TNT, in which each molecule contains an oxidizing component and a fuel component. For the composites, the total energy can be much greater than that of monomolecular materials. However, the rate at which this energy is released is relatively slow when compared to the release rate of monomolecular materials."

Source: llnl.gov: Explosive aerogels.

Keep reading the sentence highlighted in bold font until you get it through your head, troofer swine.

Thus, the best use of "nanothermite" is where minuscule, precise application of extreme heat (an exothermic reaction) is valuable--melting thin thermocouple wires, separation reactions, and the like.

Thus, "nanothermite" is unsuitable for "controlled demolition".

Now, fuck off, charlatan.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Clearly you were caught in a lie again, and now you've been exposed, again. How mortifying for you..."

Where did you prove that I lied?

Making shit up again, psychopath?

Read the paper, fraud, because I just handed your to head to you on a silver platter.

Source: llnl.gov: Explosive aerogels.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:50, Anonymous Gawking at Trainwrecks said...

"Now, fuck off, charlatan." -Billy BumbleBitch

Translation: Yes, I did lie, and now I'm humiliated. I sure have my pants pulled down a lot, especially for someone who calls people 'gay boy'. Pat taught me all about gay jokes.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:56, Blogger GuitarBill said...

You didn't have time to read the paper, cretin. As usual, you refuse to so much as read the evidence I present.

Well, you're going to read thee paper, scumbag.

So why are scientists pursuing the development of nanocomposite materials?

Answer: Safety.

Controlled demolition is NOT an intended use of nanocomposite, nor are nanocomposites suitable for "controlled demolition".

"...In addition, these `nanocomposite' materials can be easier and much safer to make than those made with traditional methods."

Source: llnl.gov: Explosive aerogels.

Squirm, Brian, squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:57, Blogger Billman said...

Holy Fuck. Are these morons STILL going on about "nano-thermite" blowing up the WTC?! SERIOUSLY?!

How many different people have to prove you wrong? GuitarBill, Mark Roberts, The fucking MythBusters on the Discovery Channel, The National Geographic Channel, about 7 billion YouTube videos of troof idiots attempting and UTTERLY FAILING to cut through anything using thermite...

Yet you ridiculous ignorant fucking retards STILL have nothing better to do than come in here and outright lie to GuitarBill when he bitch slaps your ass... all because what, a loser like Richard Gage who built a building with some steel in it says he believes thermite was used to blow up the WTC? Oh and because he has several other "Architechs and Engineers" with degrees in "swimming pool manufacturing" and "air conditioning repair" that makes him legitimate against all the people with degrees in NanonTechnology and Explosives who say that you're full of shit?

If Gage had any kind of education in nanothermite technology or explosive, then he might have some slight credibility (but he'd still be wrong), but no. He doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about, and neither does "Jesus visited America!" Dr. Jones. You guys are literally clinically retarded to put any faith in these idiots...

Official Story for the win.

 
At 29 July, 2010 09:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath offers lies as evidence, and squeals, "...Yes, I did lie."

That's not proof, scumbag. As usual, I offer rock solid evidence, and you lie like a rug. You're a psychopath, and you belong in Agnews State Hospital.

Now, read the paper, charlatan.

Source: llnl.gov: Explosive aerogels.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:12, Blogger Billman said...

Here's the troof movement in a nutshell:

Dylan Avery: smug, arrogant, petulant, pompous douche, and the biggest fucking whiner who ever existed.

Jason Bermas: arrogant, loud mouthed, retarded douche, who's more of an asshole then anyone else with one exception...

Alex Jones: fat, loud mouthed retarded douche, who screams like a little bitch for the cops the second anyone disagrees with him yelling about how those same cops are corrupt.

Jon Gold: fat, pompous, arrogant douche, who uses his mastery of emotional propaganda to dedicate every one his arrests for "asshattery" to the family members.

Richard Gage: seems to be nice in person, but put him in front of a camera and he becomes a loud "gotta talk over everyone" pompus, arrogant, lying douche... his wife left him over 9/11 truth.

Stephen Jones: just screams religious nutbar douche with his looks, and is on a political mission to prove thermite was in the towers with outright lies.

Jesse Ventura: a former Skynet T-800 terminator who has deteriorated in Doc Brown less attractive brother with down syndrome...douche.

Noone cares, crybabies.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Billman wrote, "...Holy Fuck. Are these morons STILL going on about "nano-thermite" blowing up the WTC?! SERIOUSLY?!"

Billman,

When I refer to Brain Good as a psychopath, it's not hyperbole.

Notice that he exhibits all the symptoms laid out in Dr Hare's PCL-R Factor 1 checklist.

Aggressive narcissism

1. Glibness/superficial charm
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3. Pathological lying
4. Cunning/manipulative
5. Lack of remorse or guilt
6. Emotionally shallow
7. Callous/lack of empathy
8. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Socially deviant lifestyle

1. Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
2. Parasitic lifestyle
3. Poor behavioral control
4. Promiscuous sexual behavior
5. Lack of realistic, long-term goals
6. Impulsiveness
7. Irresponsibility

I rest my case.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:15, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Nice work, Billman. I like your list and the descriptions found therein.

Bravo!

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:20, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Here's an addition to the description of Jason Bermas.

"...Jason Bermas: insane, arrogant, loud mouthed, retarded douche, who's more of an asshole then anyone else with one exception..."

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:23, Blogger Billman said...

Oh, I know Brian is crazy. He must live in his parent's basement because he's on house arrest for all the psycho stalking bullshit he's done. That's the only logical conclusion. Are we gonna believe Brian's "official story" about how awesome he is? No, I'd rather believe wild speculation and call him a girl.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:25, Blogger Billman said...

My list isn't entirely complete, because I left out people like the embezzler Luke Rude-Cow-skier and that teenage douche who sued his principal over school photos. Wow, that kid must get a lot of pussy for being an arrogant fuckwad.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Billman wrote, "...Jon Gold: fat, pompous, arrogant douche, who uses his mastery of emotional propaganda to dedicate every one his arrests for 'asshattery' to the family members."

Nice description of that fat ass-hat.

The only change I would make (and it's a minor change, at best) is to substitute demagoguery for emotional propaganda.

Nice work, Bill.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:39, Anonymous 2 Past Due Bills, 1 Cup said...

This isn't going away, BumbleBitch. Just answer the question:

GB: "Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001."

Rational Poster: "Source?"

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Pretending I didn't prove that "nanothermite" was only in the development stage as late as 2005?

Go back and search the blog. It's there, punk.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:46, Anonymous Shat Cuntly said...

"Nice work, Bill." -Guitarlatan

Yeah, that's "work"...

How's that source coming, BillyBitch?

You know I mean...

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:46, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Gawking at Trainwrecks said...
"Now, fuck off, charlatan." -Billy BumbleBitch

Translation: Yes, I did lie, and now I'm humiliated. I sure have my pants pulled down a lot, especially for someone who calls people 'gay boy'. Pat taught me all about gay jokes."

That's not an answer.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:49, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" 2 Past Due Bills, 1 Cup said...
This isn't going away, BumbleBitch. Just answer the question:

GB: "Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001."

Rational Poster: "Source?""

That's not an answer.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:50, Blogger Billman said...

GB, Brian Good actually produced something in on our debates several months back that was from circa the mid 90's which showed that things with similar concepts to nanothermite were bing THOUGHT of. So I give him kudos for that. But as for actually specifically saying "nano thermite" or "nano structured super thermite", that document did not. All he can argue is that the idea for things that LED to the idea for nanothermite existed before 2001. But the actual substance still doesn't exist. Still in the development stage.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...This isn't going away, BumbleBitch. Just answer the question:...GB: "Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001...Rational Poster:..."Source?""

Right here, douchebag.

Source: SLC: Processing and Ignition Characteristics of Aluminum–Bismuth Trioxide Nanothermite System..

From my post, we find the following:

"...During the past few years, significant progress has been made in the development of new nanoenergetic materials consisting of mixtures of metal and oxidizer nanopowders."

Source: JoPP: Processing and Ignition Characteristics of Aluminum–Bismuth Trioxide Nanothermite System.

Put that in your pipe and smoke, psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 10:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...How's that source coming, BillyBitch?"

Right here, bitch.


You have the right to be my bitch.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Notice that shitface won't touch this post with a ten foot pole.

You're a fraud, liar and an incompetent fool, Brian.

Now, go play in the freeway, charlatan.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:16, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And notice who I was "debating" when I produced the Processing and Ignition Characteristics of Aluminum–Bismuth Trioxide Nanothermite System paper.

Why it was Brian Good.

Selective memory, or a pathological liar?

Bite me--you son-of-a-bitch.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yo Brian,

Your mother eats Alpo.


You have the right to be my bitch.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:22, Blogger Billman said...

It'd be nice if one could reasonably expect a troofer to ever read a link.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:26, Anonymous BumbleBitch Blinded said...

""...During the past few years, significant progress has been made in the development of new nanoenergetic materials consisting of mixtures of metal and oxidizer nanopowders." "

Your source doesn't say what you said it did. Why is that?

Was Pat lying about the torches, or was he debunking your sorry ass? Which is it?

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:28, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Troofers have an deep seated aversion to all evidence that contradicts their propaganda; thus, they won't click on the hyperlink, let alone read it.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath continues to lie and scribbles, "...Your source doesn't say what you said it did. Why is that?"

That's right, Brian, lie and lie ad nauseum.

Fuck you, liar.

Your word isn't worth the ASCII characters you waste to post it.

 
At 29 July, 2010 11:38, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Prove it, Brian. Your opinion is NOT evidence.

I double dare you.

Go for it, Pinocchio.

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath continues to lie and scribbles, "...Your source doesn't say what you said it did. Why is that?"

I'm waiting patiently, Brian. Where's your proof that I'm lying, psychopath?

For those who want to verify that I'm telling the truth, download the pdf file and do the following: [1] point your Adobe Reader application at the pdf file; [2] click on "File" and then select "Save as Text"; [3] open the text file with your "Notepad" application; [4] click on "edit" and then select "Find" [5] search on the keyword "development".

Here's the pdf file.

Source: JoPP: Processing and Ignition Characteristics of Aluminum–Bismuth Trioxide Nanothermite System.

Report back to us and tell us, who's telling the truth, me or the psychopath?

Come on, Brian, I'm waiting for your "proof" that I'm lying--you pathetic psychopath.

So what does Brian offer as "proof"? You guess it...

*crickets*

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:22, Blogger GuitarBill said...

It's right there, Brian, immediately after the following entry:

DOI: 10.2514/1.24915

Come on, psychopath, lie to us again, cretin.

So what's Brian's response? You guessed it...

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

 
At 30 July, 2010 00:48, Anonymous chakka said...

“Secret information isn’t always the brass ring in our profession,” then CIA-director General Michael Hayden told a conference in 2008. “In fact, there’s a real satisfaction in solving a problem or answering a tough question with information that someone was dumb enough to leave out in the open.”

 
At 30 July, 2010 02:54, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Why were 5 Mossad agents celebrating the attacks?

maKKKer'

If in doubt, repeat the same lie ad nauseam:

http://www.911myths.com/html/dancing_israelis.html

And if dancing and celebrating about 9/11 are proof of foreknowledge and guilt, then that puts Saddam Hussein and the Palestinians in the frame. But they weren't responsible, any more than DA JOOOOOOOOOOS!:

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/09/12/mideast.reaction/index.html
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/20/cnn.statement/

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey GuitarBill, what does your wife think of your obsession with Brian Good?

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The catamite capon asks, "...Hey GuitarBill, what does your wife think of your obsession with Brian Good?"

I don't know, Brian, what does your live-in mommy think of your homosexual infatuation with Willie Rodriguiz--you homogenic hair fairy?

 
At 30 July, 2010 15:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous, Billy Boy doesn't actually have a "wife", he just dangles his droopy dimple around in the pigsty, his favorite hangout to hook up with "hotties" who are into him.

 
At 30 July, 2010 16:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The portly pederast and power anus porker prevaricates, "...Anonymous, Billy Boy doesn't actually have a "wife", he just dangles his droopy dimple around in the pigsty, his favorite hangout to hook up with "hotties" who are into him."

Care to diagram that sentence--you anal advocate?

 
At 02 August, 2010 12:39, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

After getting kicked around their own home field like cans of dog food,,what else can the insane Debunker Cult do but trot out the "Jew hater" garbage? You've been decimated,Boyos,and the game is over.Now,you're relegated to slandering the workers and residents down there,who are sick and dying from a toxic stew that even surpasses your own output! How does the Trite'n Dopey Fuck sleep at night? I guess no one he knows lives down there or worked down there after the disaster.

 
At 03 August, 2010 06:32, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Hey Walt, got any more good stories to tell us about that happy family of yours?

 
At 03 August, 2010 11:45, Anonymous Sackpuppy's Arhoolie said...

Poor,poor pitiful Sackdoily.

 
At 04 August, 2010 10:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Another 100% fact-free non-response, ArseHooligan?

Pathetic.

Go play in the freeway, ArseHooligan.

 
At 04 August, 2010 10:19, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

It is ABSOLUTELY a fact that Sackdoily is a pitiful,poor soul.

 
At 04 August, 2010 11:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

As opposed to what, ArseHooligan? A pea-brained, babbling scat muncher?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home