Thursday, January 21, 2010

No Payday for Payday

List of performers at Treason in America Conference today:


List yesterday:

Labels:

63 Comments:

At 21 January, 2010 08:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pat, why don't you "debunk" what Coleen and Anthony are about? Oh, that's right... you can't.

 
At 21 January, 2010 09:16, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Pat, why don't you "debunk" what Coleen and Anthony are about? Oh, that's right... you can't.

Heh, I love it how irritated the "truthers" get whenever their "movement" gets embarrassed (which is pretty frequently).

I'd like to think my 5 seconds of searching Myspace for Payday Monsanto had something to do with this.

 
At 21 January, 2010 10:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Truthers do monitor this site. Maybe Payday had not been vetted because he was recommended by somebody. I've noticed that the bad guys tend to stick together and recommend each other. You get a bullshit cabal (Rodriguez, Barrett, Ranke, Balsamo) with Barrett at the middle.

 
At 21 January, 2010 10:33, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'Pat, why don't you "debunk" what Coleen and Anthony are about?'

We've done it repeatedly on numerous threads. You just can't admit that you've been owned.

On topic, we have our own equivalent of Payday Monsanto in the UK. He's called Lowkey, and he's also a failure.

 
At 21 January, 2010 13:03, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

"I'd like to think my 5 seconds of searching Myspace for Payday Monsanto had something to do with this."

Kudos!

 
At 21 January, 2010 13:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does this mean we can't sick the SPLC and ADL on them anymore?

 
At 21 January, 2010 13:37, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Without Payday's Nazi graphics, I'm not sure there's enough transparency to put pressure on the convention center, so I don't see the point. Of course, we all know that at least half of them are anti-Semitic nutjobs, but like Alex Jones, they've learned to not come out and say it. Payday's sin was his graphic admission.

 
At 21 January, 2010 15:52, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Uh oh! The biggest politician ever is now flirting with truthnieness. His reasoning?
'If they can make Avatar, they can make anything,' the former prime minister told a press conference here yesterday after delivering his speech at the General Conference for the Support of Al-Quds to aid the Palestinians.
I really hope he was joking.
http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Malaysia/Story/A1Story20100121-193339.html

 
At 21 January, 2010 16:29, Anonymous Bikerman said...

Jack-asses.

 
At 21 January, 2010 17:02, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

REPOST:

Great Cthulu, it just keeps on getting better and better:

Teh Twoooofer's™ favorite marxist thug regime called out the go ol' USA with proof positive:

"Hugo Chavez Mouthpiece Says U.S. Hit Haiti With 'Earthquake Weapon'"

"The United States apparently possesses an "earthquake weapon" that set off the catastrophic quake in Haiti and killed 200,000 innocents. Don't believe it's true? Just ask Hugo Chavez.

Citing an alleged report from Russia's Northern Fleet, the Venezuelan strongman's state mouthpiece ViVe TV shot out a press release saying the 7.0 magnitude Haiti quake was caused by a U.S. test of an experimental shockwave system that can also create "weather anomalies to cause floods, droughts and hurricanes.""

Modern science.

Is there anything it can't do?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583588,00.html

 
At 21 January, 2010 17:17, Blogger Triterope said...

'If they can make Avatar, they can make anything'

Pffft. If anything, it's harder to make convincing computer models, because audiences are so accustomed to seeing it in movies. CGI that was top-shelf just a few years ago now looks stilted and obvious. Terminator 2: Judgment Day comes to mind. (It's still an awesome movie, though.)

 
At 21 January, 2010 17:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pwnt.

But hey what happened at luke's court date yesterday? Bet be lost since he didn't crow about a win on wearelame website yet.

 
At 22 January, 2010 05:24, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Introducing Low-Key:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcoc9Ny1BD4&feature=PlayList&p=32FA33BD1884BF67&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=1

 
At 22 January, 2010 08:37, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

I really hope he was joking.

Mahathir came out of the closet as a twoofer a few years ago. All this proves is he is still an America-hating asshole.

 
At 22 January, 2010 09:43, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Truther girl says
Haiti Quake, HAARP and the NWO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_ZEPZPtEI0&feature=related

 
At 22 January, 2010 09:54, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shyam Sunder said anything with structural elements beneath it would not experience free-fall acceleration, but the NIST report stated that there was free-fall acceleration for over 2 seconds, or 100+ feet, during the collapse of Building 7. They say it was caused by the failure of 1 out of 83 columns, but they never explained how this was possible. Neither have you. Why is that?

 
At 22 January, 2010 10:17, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Shyam Sunder said anything with structural elements beneath it would not experience free-fall acceleration, but the NIST report stated that there was free-fall acceleration for over 2 seconds, or 100+ feet, during the collapse of Building 7. They say it was caused by the failure of 1 out of 83 columns, but they never explained how this was possible. Neither have you. Why is that?"

Because you're a moron and wouldn't understand the explanation.

 
At 22 January, 2010 10:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Try me, Lazarus. Seriously.

 
At 22 January, 2010 10:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone?

 
At 22 January, 2010 10:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

anyone?

 
At 22 January, 2010 11:28, Anonymous New Yorker said...

It's already been explained.

 
At 22 January, 2010 11:37, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Well you see Anonymous due to fire parts of the internal floors collapsed, you know when you see the penthouse fall inward, (the part truthers never show you). This left much of the top and north wall of building 7 unsupported. This allowed them to fall quite quickly as shown by the video truthers will show you, the 6 second or so collapse of the north wall.

Now add that to the time it took the internal structure to collapse you have a total collapse time of over 13 seconds. In keeping from a stickily gravity driven event. and clearly demonstrated by videos of the ENTIRE event.

Now the fact you are so mentally challenge as to NOT understand something rather simple is rather telling, but not surprising given the level of competence of your average truther. These questions of yours will always rattle around in you pea size brain, but will mean nothing to us who are educated and more analytically endowed.

Basically just run along little boy and don't think about it, it's something you are not equipped for.

 
At 22 January, 2010 11:40, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Now instead of asking stupid question explain how what Shyam Sunder said demonstrates a controlled demolition?

 
At 22 January, 2010 12:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Kyte, if the north wall of WTC7 was unsupported, why didn't it fold up like a wet paper bag as the NIST computer models predicted? How can you have 600 foot columns with no lateral support and they don't buckle? Want to explain that, Your Excellency?

 
At 22 January, 2010 12:35, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"you are so mentally challenge..."
"In keeping from a stickily gravity driven event..." "around in you pea size brain..."

Funny how geniuses like you butcher the English language, and then call strangers 'mentally challenge'.
You also clearly misunderstood the question, and failed to answer it in any way: the full duration of the collapse is immaterial. I'm referring to the period of free-fall, confirmed by NIST, which means all potential energy is being converted to motion. Do you understand what this means, and why Sunder would have said it's impossible, or is it time for someone else to help you out?

 
At 22 January, 2010 12:51, Anonymous New Yorker said...

It's already been explained.

 
At 22 January, 2010 13:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Yorker, could you show me where it has been explained, or are you just lying to yourself and others?

 
At 22 January, 2010 13:20, Anonymous New Yorker said...

New Yorker, could you show me where it has been explained, or are you just lying to yourself and others?

I'm not lying. It's been explained.

 
At 22 January, 2010 13:25, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

See.

Did I say he wouldn't understand it or did I say he wouldn't understand it?

Frikkin' moron with laser beams on his head.

 
At 22 January, 2010 13:29, Anonymous Anonymous said...

New Yorker, you're just spamming now.

Laz, what exactly did I not understand? Can you point to it?

If none of you can provide an explanation, why would you think it's been explained?
Is rational discourse even possible on this forum?

 
At 22 January, 2010 13:39, Anonymous Bikerman said...

"rational discourse" is a concept that is impossible for troofers to understand you blithering moron.

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc082108.html

 
At 22 January, 2010 14:01, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Laz, what exactly did I not understand? Can you point to it?"\


Everything, boron.

Everything.

 
At 22 January, 2010 14:02, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Is rational discourse even possible on this forum?"

Not with you, you retarded marmoset.

 
At 22 January, 2010 14:03, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

And boron, you never answered the question I asked earlier.

When you were a child playing in the sandbox, did the cat try to cover you up?

 
At 22 January, 2010 14:07, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Biker: Since you posted the link, can you point to where NIST explains how the failure of 1 column caused all elements to descend at once, with no resistance at all?

You too, Lazarus. You can both show me just how 'rational' your discourse is.

 
At 22 January, 2010 14:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Retarded marmoset? That's clever. Now how about some real analysis? What's keeping you?

 
At 22 January, 2010 15:09, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Retarded marmoset? That's clever. Now how about some real analysis? What's keeping you?

Nobody cares, Petgoat.

 
At 22 January, 2010 15:12, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

911 troof movement = continuing fail

 
At 22 January, 2010 15:22, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Anonymous said...
Retarded marmoset? That's clever. Now how about some real analysis? What's keeping you?"

You're a retarded marmoset.

You wouldn't understand.

 
At 22 January, 2010 15:34, Anonymous Anonymous said...

clever, not original.

I pretty quickly found the term "retarded marmoset" in a 10/04 post:

http://www.nhbgear.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=v9mj1hlpd2dstfv47lebmq58f5&action=search2

 
At 22 January, 2010 15:41, Anonymous New Yorker said...

So after a brief appearance by other "truthers", it appears we're back to the usual pair of Brian and Spacebar Guy, is that right?

Brian, considering all the sockpuppets you have out there on the internet, it's weird that you haven't created a new one here. Just go with Snug.bug.

 
At 22 January, 2010 15:45, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Also, Brian, can you start calling us "girls" again? That was always worth a laugh.

 
At 22 January, 2010 16:03, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Funny how geniuses like you butcher the English language,

Yes Brian, as a writer I suck, I sometime type you instead of your, But science was my thing and maybe that is why I understand it so much better than you. Although the fact you are by all standards a guy who can't grasp even the simplest of physics may have something to do with it.

Yes Brian I am smarter than you and so I am not a truther. You will always be that idiot who at 55 can't hold a simple janitorial job. You should feel inferior because everyone except maybe spacebar guy is better that you. It's all part of being a truther, cause and effect.

So now thy your hardest and explain in your own simpleton way exactly why the statement by Shyam Sunder demonstrates a controlled demolition? No more stupid question and insight about my typing skills. Prove you are not the idiots you present so well.

Here I will help you out.... A controlled demolition would not necessarily cause the free fall of parts of the building. You do understand that.

 
At 22 January, 2010 16:20, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"If none of you can provide an explanation, why would you think it's been explained?"

Brian time to put up or shut up.

Why is it YOU can not find an explanation or understand the one all others seem to grasp, barring that give a clear logical explanation exactly why the statement by Shyam Sunder even remotely implies a controlled demolition.

The fact YOU don't know does not make building 7 a controlled demolition.

You are like a petulant child asking "Daddy Why?" when told he is wrong. And given the thing you have said I suspect a child is not far from your intelligence level.

"Explain to me Daddy"
"Why Daddy?"

STOP BEING THE FOOL.

 
At 23 January, 2010 16:09, Anonymous paul w said...

Brian, here's a comment you made on the Aussie truther site, 9110z:

"After way too many years on this stuff, I would be extremely grateful if some knowledgeable engineer would pat my silly little head and show me where I'm wrong so I can move on in my life. I have emailed a couple thousand college professors and I've never seen any indication that they can."

There were many 'knowledgeable engineers' involved in the NIST reports.

Accept the reality, and move on.

Also, you sent a "couple of thousand emails", Brian?

Please, seek professional help.

 
At 23 January, 2010 18:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Kyte, I didn't say anything about Shyam Sunder in this thread. That was some other anonymous.

Thanks for using the word "demonstrates" instead of "proves". Extra points for nuance! Of course it's still rather blunt.

How about "suggests"?

Did NIST ever do an energetic analysis quantifying the energy necessary to pulverize the concrete and dismember and crush the steel bix columns? I didn't think so.

 
At 23 January, 2010 18:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Kyte, I didn't say anything about Shyam Sunder in this thread. That was some other anonymous.

Thanks for using the word "demonstrates" instead of "proves". Extra points for nuance! Of course it's still rather blunt.

How about "suggests"?

Did NIST ever do an energetic analysis quantifying the energy necessary to pulverize the concrete and dismember and crush the steel box columns? If they did, I don't think they published it.

Unfortunately, NIST's behavior in tossing its empirical studies of the truss-sag theory suggest that they tossed a lot of studies counterindicating their theories.

 
At 23 January, 2010 18:46, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this the conference thats going to be in Pennsylvania in March? I think I'm going to try to go to it as its only about an hour and a half from me. I keep seeing these things in Vancouver and Toronto and New Zealand. Its nice to have something local.
-Emory

 
At 23 January, 2010 21:14, Anonymous New Yorker said...

"After way too many years on this stuff, I would be extremely grateful if some knowledgeable engineer would pat my silly little head and show me where I'm wrong so I can move on in my life. I have emailed a couple thousand college professors and I've never seen any indication that they can."

It's because nobody cares about your insane beliefs, Brian. Professors are busy people who don't have time to respond to lunatics. I've explained this to you many times.

Also, you sent a "couple of thousand emails", Brian?

Please, seek professional help.


What paul w. said.

 
At 24 January, 2010 21:20, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Poo-day for Payday

 
At 25 January, 2010 00:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Poo-pay for Payday

 
At 25 January, 2010 10:00, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

"...the six second collapse of the front wall" HaHaHaHaHaHa...is Shyte at the moldy crack again? Hey Shyte,after saving up for your bus ride to Pennsylvania to have your ass handed to you by "truthers",why don't you take advantage of the Medicaid program and have your head examined.

 
At 26 January, 2010 10:15, Blogger Triterope said...

Mr. Kyte, I didn't say anything about Shyam Sunder in this thread. That was some other anonymous.

Then pick a fucking name, and you won't have that problem anymore.

 
At 26 January, 2010 11:21, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

"..the six second collapse of the front wall".Sure,Chief,it's so obvious,just look at the video.HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa R.I.P. Whining Dogs of the Lunatic Debunker Cult+Nico Haupt.

 
At 26 January, 2010 13:31, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Whining Dogs of the Lunatic Debunker Cult"

Lather.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Get sucked down into a the black hole of truther insanity.

 
At 27 January, 2010 09:51, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

And then Shyte referred to the "six second collapse of the front wall".HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa! Funny how cheap tents fold in a light wind,ain't it!

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:06, Blogger dgdgdf said...

http://www.bootboots.com
http://www.salelouboutin.com
http://www.buylouboutin.com
http://www.bestlouisvuitton.com
http://www.sale-mbt.com
http://www.discount-christianlouboutin.com
Velours Scrunch Boots Miss Clichy 140 boots Robot 120 ankle boots Black Suede/ Leather Lace Up Ankle boots Tina Suede Black Platform Boots Circus Cutout Suede Ankle Boots

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:06, Blogger dgdgdf said...

Deva 120 suede fringed Boots Sigourney Metallc Ankle Boots Miss Dark Brown Miss Suede Black Arielle A Talon ankle Boots Ariella Clou Silver Studded Boots Alta Arielle A Talon Python Short Boots Robot 120 ankle boots Gold babel shoe boots Brown Trottinette 140 ankle boots Brown Trottinette 140 ankle boots Mouse suede Forever Tina boots Purple fringed suede C'est Moi boots Black C'est Moi boots Pink Charme 100 suede ankle boots Leopard suede boots Christian Louboutin Tuba Tall Boot Fifre Suede Ankle Boot black lace ankle boots

 
At 27 January, 2010 18:07, Blogger dgdgdf said...

Black Lace-Up Boots black fold-over boots black leather knee-high boots peep-toe bootie Christian Louboutin Astraqueen shoe boots platform lace-up bootie Christian Louboutin Suede Black Ankle boots supra fifre 120 thigh-high boots Christian Louboutin Alta Ariella Talon Leopard Boots Christian Louboutin OTK PlatformAfrica grey suede Boot Christian Louboutin Alta Ariella Talon Leopard Ankle Boots Christian Louboutin black leather ankle boots Christian Louboutin dark red leather ankle boots Manolo Blahnik Something Blue Satin Pump

 
At 28 January, 2010 16:14, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

R.I.P.,Whining,Running Dogs of the Debunker Cult.May it serve you well.

 
At 28 January, 2010 16:25, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

And then Shyte referred to the "six second collapse of the front wall".I mean,that one is beyond priceless! Boy,when a liberal Democrat from Abandoned Buildings,Michigan folds his tent he folds it with a bang,not a whimper!!

 
At 30 January, 2010 09:17, Blogger Billman said...

I'm sorry... what?

 
At 30 January, 2010 09:55, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

In case you missed it Bilbo,the liberal Democrat from Tommy Hearns' neck of the woods took another look at #7 falling neatly into a pile and claimed he could break it down like a madcap Nazi scientist.He saw the North face of the building "collapsing" in six seconds.No word on what he saw the West face of the bulding doing, or any other side for that matter! Oh well,we knew that boy was going to crash mightily at some point,so.......The Debunker Cult:"We make it up as we go along and DAMN THE TORPEDOES,FULL SPEED AHEAD!!!"

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home