Thursday, July 29, 2010

Greatest. Thread. Evah!

Over at Above Top Secret, a commenter proposes banning all posters who have some form of mental illness. And suddenly we learn that there are more nuts over there than in a Sam's Club jar of Skippy. It starts with this comment:

People with mental illnesses have a lot more to contribute to society than so called 'normal' people.


More? Come on! I can see arguing that they have something to contribute, sure. As is pointed out in that post, some famous and talented people in history have had mental problems. But they are the exception, not the rule. And it continues:

I have many times OPENLY disclosed my legal mental state AKA Legally Insane on ATS and BTS and Mutter [when it existed] and Chat... people often are shocked by my extreme ideas and are not past posting "Are You Crazy???"


Here's an interesting thought for you...I have openly stated that I hear voices 24/7 somewhere in the thread that is first linked in my signature...in fact, I think I have been targeted for over a decade now.

Should I be banned?


And that one is posted by a moderater over there!

99 Comments:

At 29 July, 2010 12:17, Anonymous Fisting Physics with Pat said...

A caller once asked Pat Curley exactly how large pieces of the WTC embedded themselves into the side of the Deutsche Bank building. Let's pick it up from there...

Caller:...one of the core columns a 30 foot piece ---

Curley:It wasn’t a core column it was an exterior column

Caller: Right

Curley: Although it may be it may be some of the core columns because the core columns did remain standing for a couple of seconds uhh I believe, ugluhh...one of the towers was like about 60 stories the core column was still standing for about 3 or 4 seconds and then you can see it drop off to the side uuhhhh… so… [SIC]

Caller: You're not answering my question.
(and the audience found that shocking)

So Pat: could you explain exactly how it MAY have been the core columns sticking out of the Deutsche bank because core columns were left standing after the collapse? How exactly does that work in the real world? Can things be hurled outward and still be standing in your world? Give us some math on that, tiger.

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:41, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Trolling again, scumbag Brian Good?

Pat, when I refer to Brain Good as a psychopath, it's not hyperbole.

Notice that Brian Good exhibits all the symptoms laid out in Dr Hare's PCL-R Factor 1 checklist.

Aggressive narcissism

[1] Glibness/superficial charm
[2] Grandiose sense of self-worth
[3] Pathological lying
[4] Cunning/manipulative
[5] Lack of remorse or guilt
[6] Emotionally shallow
[7] Callous/lack of empathy
[8] Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Socially deviant lifestyle

[1] Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
[2] Parasitic lifestyle
[3] Poor behavioral control
[4] Promiscuous sexual behavior
[5] Lack of realistic, long-term goals
[6] Impulsiveness
[7] Irresponsibility

Source: Hare Psychopathy Checklist .

I rest my case.

Now, ban the SOB, Pat.

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:41, Anonymous Pat Won't Defend This? said...

Or do you have no basis nor explanation of this ridiculously absurd assessment? C'mon Pat, defend YOUR OWN WORDS.

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:43, Anonymous BillyBitch Whines again said...

Maybe Guitarlatan BumbleBitch would care to explain Pat's advanced knowledge of physics, when he's finished taking up space with ad-homs?

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Yo Brian,

Your live-in mommy eats Alpo.

Tell us, Brian, did you ever get over your homosexual obsession with Willie Rodgruiz?

Do you still stalk Carol Brouillet--you evil nutcase?

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:46, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The lying psychopath dissembles, "...Maybe Guitarlatan BumbleBitch would care to explain Pat's advanced knowledge of physics, when he's finished taking up space with ad-homs?"

Hypocrite!

Come on, Brian, take a moment and share a can of alpo with your live-in mommy. Or are you too busy trolling SLC--you evil nut bar.

 
At 29 July, 2010 12:58, Anonymous Arhoolie V. said...

So,how did that beam get stuck in the building across the street? If you were there to see it (after the event),it was embedded pretty deeply into the American Express Building.Quickly the "Git" goes on a Google.com binge and comes up.....with the boomerang theory! What the hell,give it a twirl,Pom Pom Git!

 
At 29 July, 2010 13:14, Anonymous Pat is bewildered by Pat said...

GB: "Bullshit. "nanothemite" wasn't even in the development phase in 2001."

Rational Poster: "Source?""

GB: "Now, fuck off, charlatan."
"You're a fraud, liar and an incompetent fool, Brian."
"Fuck you, liar."
"I double dare you."

...and yet, a simple search would yield that LLNL was already conducting experiments in 1999... Poor, pathetic broken guitar...

 
At 29 July, 2010 13:17, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Try something called physics--you moron.

What's the use? You couldn't think to save your worthless hide.

 
At 29 July, 2010 13:25, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath continues to tell the same lies over-and-over again, "...and yet, a simple search would yield that LLNL was already conducting experiments in 1999... Poor, pathetic broken guitar..."

%^)

"...conducting experiments"?

Thanks for proving my point, stalker boi.

Why no source, liar?

Here's the truth.

"...During the past few years, significant progress has been made in the development of new nanoenergetic materials consisting of mixtures of metal and oxidizer nanopowders."

Source: JoPP: Processing and Ignition Characteristics of Aluminum–Bismuth Trioxide Nanothermite System.

In fact, I DEBUNKED your lies in the previous thread, but you're sick--a pathological liar--so you can't stop lying.

Right here--you evil, lying psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 13:33, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And you didn't answer my questions--you demented degenerate.

Tell us, Brian, did you ever get over your homosexual obsession with Willie Rodgruiz?

Do you still stalk Carol Brouillet--you evil nutcase?

Source: Are Homosexuals Psychopaths?.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
At 29 July, 2010 13:37, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"So Pat: could you explain exactly how it MAY have been the core columns sticking out of the Deutsche bank because core columns were left standing after the collapse?"

My goodness, you are truly ginourmously idiotically stupid, aren't you?

Did you even fucking READ what you just cut n' pasted?

I guess not.

 
At 29 July, 2010 13:49, Blogger Pat said...

The American Express building or the Deutsche Bank Building? Both had columns sticking out of them, but they are not the same building. And the core columns (often referred to as the "Spire") remained standing for only a few seconds, then toppled over. Depending on which way they toppled they could easily have hit either building or even both; the Spire was at least 50-60 stories high.

Glad to clear that up for you.

 
At 29 July, 2010 14:01, Anonymous Pat Clears up Nothing said...

"Depending on which way they toppled they could easily have hit either building or even both; the Spire was at least 50-60 stories high."
-Pat's Phuzzy Physics

Kind of like torches 'could easily' have put thousands of tons of melted iron in the dust, huh? That may be good enough for you, Pat, but honest research requires corroboration and a working theory of how those columns stabbed into the sides of the buildings. You're just throwing shit around again.

 
At 29 July, 2010 14:05, Blogger Pat said...

Now a freaking janitor is an expert in physics?

 
At 29 July, 2010 14:07, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Pat, but honest research requires corroboration and a working theory of how those columns stabbed into the sides of the buildings. You're just throwing shit around again."

Tell us, what does a psychopath who dropped out of Junior College know about "honesty" or "research"?

How do you manage to keep a straight face while typing such rubbish--you demented fruit loop?

 
At 29 July, 2010 14:09, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Pat wrote, "...Now a freaking janitor is an expert in physics?"

Brian Good's an expert at Jonesian pseudo-physics.

You know, the kind of physics that violates the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

 
At 29 July, 2010 14:13, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Steven Jones wrote, "...Scaling to the 110-story WTC towers, roughly 1300 lbs [590 kg] of explosives per tower would suffice."

Source: journalof911studies.com: Why did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?

Brian, enlighten us and explain how 3,900 lbs. of "nanothermite" (Jones theory) will produce 10,000 tons of iron-rich sphere.

And don't forget to violate the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of mass.

Squirm, Brian, squirm--you lying weasel.

 
At 29 July, 2010 14:35, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Kind of like torches 'could easily' have put thousands of tons of melted iron in the dust, huh? That may be good enough for you, Pat, but honest research requires...[blah][blah][blah]."

There he goes again. Why do you persist in telling the same tired, stale, thoroughly DEBUNKED lies, Brian?

Source: SLC: Does the obvious always evade you, retard?.

The answer is obvious: You're a psychopath.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath whines, "...Can things be hurled outward and still be standing in your world? Give us some math on that, tiger."

Yup, Brian Good brings new meaning to Mark Robert's observation: "...Gage and his gang of lazy, lying, despicable creeps."

You make me want to puke--you demented piece of filth.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:29, Anonymous Pat's Physics Phyzzles said...

"You make me want to puke--you demented piece of filth." -GutHurler

That's nice.

"Now a freaking janitor is an expert in physics?" Pat Wiggly

Hilarious, Pat, except just after that exchange, when he asks you how the steel got there in the fist place, this happened:

Pat Curley: "As you push something down, something must give, things move out to the side in order to allow that thing to keep going down."

What a pearl of phyzix, Pat, but today they were 'toppling', and it was the 'American Express building or the Deutsche Bank Building?'. Back then it was just the D.Bank, and things were being moved 'out to the side'.

In either case, I'm sure you think they 'could easily' spear themselves into those buildings, just like the torches 'could easily' account for 5+% of the WTC dust.

Clearly it's not just 'make up your alleged mind', it's 'do you have any idea what the you're talking about?'.

Can you give me any idea how you were ever associated with the term 'debunking'? You seem to have no clue about much of anything. You know? I mean...

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:33, Anonymous Pat's Law Degree said...

OOOOPS! I forgot Pat's Maxim of Jurisprudence:

If a person's story changes, even more than once, they're MORE trustworthy, especially if it's 'caught and corrected'. Then it becomes 'the mistake OR the lie'.

By that logic, I guess there's nothing squirrely about Pat Curley, who lies not just singly, but plurr'ly.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:34, Anonymous Pat's School Teacher said...

Plur'lly, of course.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:36, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...What a pearl of phyzix."

That's right--you "lazy, lying, despicable creep"--pretend that I never DEBUNKED your bilge and propaganda--you schmuck.

Source: SLC: Does the obvious always evade you, retard?.

Brian, isn't that your mother calling you to dinner? "...Yum, Alpo! Thanks ma!"

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:39, Anonymous Billy Is A Gas said...

"...Yum, Alpo! Thanks ma!"
-GuitarResearchesTheFacts

You've clearly been working on your material. It just gets better.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:40, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Face it, fudge-packer the despicable, you lost another "debate".

Brian, your live-in mommy's calling you to dinner. "...Yum, Alpo! Thanks ma!"

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:41, Anonymous Remember This GutBall said...

"As you push something down, something must give, things move out to the side in order to allow that thing to keep going down."

-Pat Curley

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:45, Anonymous Pat's Inquisitive Mind said...

It may have been core columns toppling and spearing themselves into the building, since they WERE standing up, or maybe getting pushed down. Golly, whatever it was, I'm SURE it wasn't anything suspicious. SURE of it.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:48, Anonymous Brian Good's School Teacher said...

"Brian Good--you toffee-nosed sod--get your hands out of Johnny's shorts, or I'm sending you to the principal."

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:50, Anonymous Goodnight, Patrick said...

"Brian Good--you toffee-nosed sod--get your hands out of Johnny's shorts, or I'm sending you to the principal."

More gay jokes from Pat and his friends. Here's a tip: when you use someone's ACTUAL WORDS to show they're a fraud and a liar, it's a lot funnier.

 
At 29 July, 2010 15:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

What's the matter, Mr. Sock Puppet, you don't like it when your tactics are used against you?

Hypocrite!

Brian, your live-in mommy's calling you to dinner. "...Yum, Alpo! Thanks ma!"

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:00, Anonymous Bill's Inspiring Creativity said...

Stay on topic, GuiltyShill. You're derailing the whole thread.

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:04, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Wrong again, My Alzheimer's disease, you derailed the thread from the first post.

Don't you have a teenage boy to bugger, Brian?

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:05, Anonymous Pat Wants To Know said...

"Don't you have a teenage boy to bugger, Brian?"

Why do you say things like that so often?

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

I don't know, Brian, did you ever get over your homosexual obsession with Willie Rodgruiz?

Source: truthjihad: 9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked.

Don't you love troofer cat fights?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:16, Anonymous G String Chasing Air said...

"Maybe Guitarlatan BumbleBitch would care to explain Pat's advanced knowledge of physics, when he's finished taking up space with ad-homs?" -The Mirror at your Face


"Your live-in mommy eats Alpo."

"...did you ever get over your homosexual obsession with Willie Rodgruiz? (SIC)"

"Do you still stalk Carol Brouillet--you evil nutcase?"

I guess G-String wasn't ready to talk about the physics. Was he ever? How many Brians is that, guys?

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:20, Anonymous Pat's Admirable Bravery said...

"If I ever meet David Ray Griffin, I'm going to have a tough time restraining myself from punching him in the face."-Pat Cowardly

Or maybe he'll topple while still standing, but still spear himself into the next building. Either way works for you, right big man?

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:22, Anonymous GutBoy is Robin said...

"I hope your life insurance policy is up to date." -GutBile

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Holy Quaint Threats!! Golly!

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Q: Who is Brian Good?

"A: A sexually-frustrated wacko who, in his late 50s, still lives in his parents' basement in Palo Alto.

"B. A bisexual stalker who targets famous 9/11 activists of both the female and male persuasions.

"C. A coward who spends 18 hours a day hiding behind a keyboard and cyber-stalking the targets of his obsessions under a long list of pseudonyms, but is afraid to debate them live or on the radio.

"D. All of the above."


Answer: All of the above.


Continued...

ROTFLMAO!


"...Friday, July 31, 2009

"Slandered by Sex-Stalker 'Brian Good' and Op-Ed News Editor

"'Brian Good' is probably the most hilariously dubious character in the whole 9/11 truth movement. Truth and justice activist Carol Brouillet reports that Brian volunteered to do the grunt work for her group, then started sexually stalking and harassing her. She should have had him charged, convicted, and imprisoned. Instead, she very firmly showed him the door.

"'Brian' then volunteered for Richard Gage's AE911truth.org and disrupted that group.

"Meanwhile 'Brian' has been stalking and harassing William Rodriguez and myself, repeatedly vandalizing our Wikipedia entries until he was finally banned from Wikipedia. For some reason 'Brian' claims to blame me for the popularity of William Rodriguez, who was famous long before anyone had ever heard of me.

"What might explain such bizarre compulsive behavior? 'Brian' is reportedly obsessed with sick sexual fantasies about leading 9/11 truthers -- the kind of stuff he repeatedly inflicted on a very unwilling and utterly disgusted Carol Brouillet until she told him to get lost or she would call the police. William Rodriguez and I, like Carol, apparently suffer the misfortune of playing a role in 'Brian''s fantasy life. This is, of course, assuming that 'Brian' is what he appears to be -- a lunatic sex criminal -- rather than a paid provocateur pretending to be a lunatic sex criminal."


Source: truthjihad: 9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked.

Don't you love troofer cat fights?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:35, Anonymous Objectivity said...

Spamming at shadows,
Grasping at straws,
Gutboy is desparate,
And it sticks in his craw.

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:39, Anonymous Debunking Community said...

Was it torches or pumice again? C'mon guys, figure it out, so we know what to say.

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:41, Anonymous Pat's too hungry to post said...

"Yeah it’s it’s kind of an oddball movement you know I mean, uh as I as I put it one time you know I mean uh.. uh suppose you had a bunch of people and- and- and- one group of people like chocolate ice cream and 1 group of people like uh vanilla ice cream and 1 group of people like strawberry ice cream, well, you know I mean the only way to get ‘em together is to call yourselves the ice cream movement." -Pat Cowardly

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Up the airy mountain,
"Down the rushy glen,
"We daren't go a-hunting,
"For fear of little men..."
-- William Allingham

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:44, Anonymous Is that Crickets I hear? said...

If I were Pat, I'd sure defend my words and demonstrate my physics prowess, instead of fleeing like a coward after being exposed.

Glad I could clear that up for you. you know? I mean...

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:49, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...[E]xposed"?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Stop it, junior college dropout, you're killing me.

ROTFLMAO!

Sorry poofter, but I'm not familiar with Jonesian pseudo physics. You on the other hand...

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:51, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The psychopath dissembles, "...Was it torches or pumice again? C'mon guys, figure it out, so we know what to say."

Another demonstration of your third grade reading comprehension skills, Mr. Psychopath?

Pathetic.

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:51, Anonymous Pat Sees Brian All Over said...

"The column failed over 8 floors"
-Punt Desperately

"So did Pat Curley."
-Critical Thinkers

 
At 29 July, 2010 16:59, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Pat Sees Brian All Over..."

Belch!

Source: Buckling of the lower exterior columns--Floors 7 through 14.

What were you saying, Brian--you coffee-nosed sod?

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:03, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Correction.

What were you saying, Brian--you toffee-nosed sod?

My apology to "coffee-nosed sods".

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:09, Anonymous ArhoolieV. said...

Wait just a cotton pickin' second there soldiers.Did the ridiculous Pat Curley actually say that the impaled beams (most notably the American Express lightning bolt)could have come from the core columns which lingered upright before shotting staright down into the foundation? Are you fucking nuts,or just plain stupid,Jethro?

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:09, Anonymous ArhoolieV. said...

Ok,so it's:shooting straight.

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:12, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Hold it! Is The ArseHooligan, fugitive from justice, a structural engineer?

Well, he's been known to pitch a tent or two.

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:46, Blogger Triterope said...

Uh... anybody wanna talk about the ATS post? Because there's some comedy gold over there:

I don't see any way to separate mental illness from ATS. This site caters to people with delusions of grandeur and paranoid tendencies.

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:51, Blogger Triterope said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 29 July, 2010 17:58, Blogger Billman said...

Wow. I hope none of these guys have children, because I'd seriously be concerned for their safety living with such dangerously retarded people. Wow.

The spire couldn't have toppled over, I guess, so the only thing it could have been is exploding thermite that shot steel columns into buildings, is that right, dumbfucks?

I would totally believe you if you could produce any evidence that thermite can shoot a steel beam like that,

And also explain why it could not possibly be that immense weight and pressure from a collapsing building caused it.

Oh and, why can't you fucktards get it through your heads that the discussion is not that there's a contradiction between "pumice OR torches" causing the microspheres...

Its that your fucktard religion of troof claims that microsphere scan ONLY come from thermite, when mere mortal commenters here have completely debunked that wild speculatory theory with two different scenarios using actual evidence and links that you can only refute by attacking the commenter and blatantly lying and ignoring the leak.

Such stupid, paranoid, whiney, loser, pompous assholes. I don't even give a fuck about not using ad-homs against you retards anymore, because you're just too arrogantly stupid and ridiculously fucking pathetic and so damn thick headed and angry over being proven wrong, that its just pointless to do anything other than point and laugh at your fucking hilarious stupidity....

Oh, and I'm sure the battle for 9/11 truth, and consolation for all the family members will be won by naming GuitarBill, GutterBall... yep, retarded whimiscal names are the secret to getting respected in the scientific community! Published in a respectable journal be damned, calling everyone at SLC a "git" is that way to prove thermite can do the impossible!

Though, TrollInPat'sVagina was a good one...

 
At 29 July, 2010 18:00, Blogger Triterope said...

You know Pat... I don't want to tell you how to run your blog, but... if I'd posted something as relevant and hilarious as that ATS thread, and the first response was "could you explain how the core columns sticking out of the Deutsche bank building were left standing after the collapse", I'd be pretty fuckin' pissed.

Have you noticed every goddamn thread on here is the same stupid shit no matter what the original topic was?

Personally, I think there are some ideas of value in that ATS thread that SLC can use. Namely, this.

 
At 29 July, 2010 18:45, Blogger GuitarBill said...

MemoryShock wrote, "...Here's an interesting thought for you...I have openly stated that I hear voices 24/7 somewhere in the thread that is first linked in my signature...in fact, I think I have been targeted for over a decade now.

"Should I be banned?"


Hilarious! You can't make this stuff up.

Treatment: Go to infowars and purchase a shiny new tin-foil hat--yeah, that's the ticket.

 
At 29 July, 2010 19:21, Blogger Billman said...

Don't ban Brian Good, or Arhoolie, or any of the other fucktards that post their off-topic hate filled drivel. Because then it becomes personal. I don't think there's anything to ever take personally from a post (despite what Dylan Avery and Jon Gold would claim otherwise). We come here to have fun and poke each other til someone explodes. Rarely, do we have a coherent debate, but I wouldn't rule out that its not possible. Even Arhoolie has the rare occasion of speaking like a normal human being. And yeah, the arrogant stupidity gets annoying.. but they shouldn't be banned for exercising their right to make themselves look like an asshole.

I believe, with the exception of Brian Good who really radiates dangerous psycho stalker tendencies (and possibly Boris as well) that most of the dumbasses that post as troofers would probably be decent people to talk to in person.

Although, the possibility that they are all insane convicted murderers posting from the warden's internet connection at the same mental hospital has occured to me...

 
At 29 July, 2010 20:01, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

brian the psychopath seems to be getting more and more desperate.

'Smatter, brian, is your psychopath playbook not working here?

The sane people here recognize you for what you are: a crazy, pitiful mook.

 
At 29 July, 2010 22:07, Anonymous custom logo designs said...

Your blog is pretty good and impressed me a lot. This article along with the images is quite in-depth and gives a good overview of the topic.

logo design | business logo designs | company logo design | corporate logo designs

 
At 29 July, 2010 22:20, Blogger orphia_nay said...

I love it when a debunker posts evidence that conspiracy nuts are insane, and then conspiracy nuts go on to exactly prove that in their replies!

 
At 30 July, 2010 02:14, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Brian Good dies, and comes face to face with the Almighty. Brian says 'Lord, I've got a question for you. Ever since September 11th 2001 I've been obsessed with finding out the truth about 9/11. My entire life after that event was devoted to uncovering the real conspirators responsible for the attacks. So please tell me Lord. Who did it?'

God replies - 'It was Osama bin Laden, although the plan was Khalid Sheikh Mohamed's. Osama had established a global network of likeminded Salafi Islamists, bent on evicting the infidels from the Arab world and reestablishing the caliphate. From 1996, this network was based in Afghanistan, and it claimed its first terrorist attacks (as Al Qaeda) in 1998, when it also declared war on the USA.

In the spring of 1999 AQ trained 19 young Arabs (15 Saudis, 1 Egyptian, 1 Lebanese, 2 from the UAE) to hijack four domestic US flights, and then use them as suicide aircraft. KSM had the idea, Osama funded it, and the US intelligence services failed to pick up signs of an imminent attack. And that's how 9/11 happened'.

A stunned Brian walks away from God in silence, thinking 'This conspiracy is bigger than I thought ...'

 
At 30 July, 2010 02:15, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Don't ban Arseholie. I enjoy reading his oh-so-convincing stories about his wonderful life, particularly the details about his family, which does exist ... really.

 
At 30 July, 2010 07:23, Blogger Triterope said...

I have openly stated that I hear voices 24/7... In fact, I think I have been targeted for over a decade now.

With these conspiracy people, it's hard to tell what's actual mental illness and what's just being a douchebag. I think the above post is a little of both.

You have to be pretty damn full of yourself to think you're so important that the government has to "target" you. But you also have to be pretty damn thick not to figure out that if they haven't liquidated you after ten years, they're probably not going to tomorrow.

Is that mental illness, though? I don't think so. Anyone sane enough to know they're crazy isn't that crazy. Truly ill people have no idea there's anything wrong with them.

Of all the things Did John Patrick Bedell and Sean Fitzgerald and James von Brunn wrote on the Internet, did they ever once say "I think I might be crazy"? No, they didn't.

And since the people on that thread are all so eager to list their conditions, I question the whole lot of them.

 
At 30 July, 2010 11:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Say slipshod and crashes, would "God" (Who doesn't exist, just like Allah and YHWH) also include in that little narrative the fact that Ali Mohamed, Al Qaeda's tactical trainer, worked for the FBI, the CIA and Special Forces? How would "God" justify torturing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to extract a "confession"?

Why don't you and your "God" fuck off, sacknut?

Lastly, I have a little question for Pat. Are you aware that the "spire" consisted of core columns? How could parts of the "spire" have impaled the sides of the Deutsche Bank building if the photos clearly show it was impaled by an exterior panel?

None of this proves "controlled demolition", I'm just trying to keep your lies straight. A cult leader must be convincing.

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The stupidest conspiracy theory of all: an omnipotent, omniscient entity conspired with two of his self-sculpted creations, named "Adam" and "Eve" to create the human race, so that they may pay for their "sins" until the "apocalypse".

What a bunch of "God"awful nutjobs: Christians, Muslims and Jews. Any "debunker" here prepared to admit he/she believes this utterly mental gobbledegook?

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about the Climate Change conspiracy theory? The Iranian nuke conspiracy theory? Any takers? These are some examples of conspiracy theories which are "allowed" by you extremist fruit loops aren't they. Can you say "double standard"?

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:13, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bible Study - Sackcloth and Ashes

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The rump ranger rodent prattles, "...What a bunch of 'God' awful nutjobs: Christians, Muslims and Jews. Any 'debunker' here prepared to admit he/she believes this utterly mental gobbledegook?"

No, I can't say that I endorse superstitious nonsense--you tail gunning torch.

However, I find your statement rather amusing--and especially so when one considers the conspiranoid kookery you endorse.

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:22, Blogger avicenne said...

That ATS site is madness. Somebody asks in a recent post, "Did Guy Ritchie know of 9/11?", and includes a screenshot from Snatch where apparently one can see "11 9" somewhere in the background.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread598232/pg1

In other breaking news apparently the NWO plans to "wipe out 30 million people in Gulf States, Central & South America."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread593211/pg1

This is the world where "pull it" is all the evidence you need.

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:23, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The grindle packing goober smoocher prattles, "...How about the Climate Change conspiracy theory? The Iranian nuke conspiracy theory? Any takers?"

No, I can't say that I endorse that crap either--you up hill gardening waste hole wanderer.

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:27, Anonymous Karl said...

Pat, do you have any idea how many Americans are stricken with mental illness? How many of them do you think take absolutely no stock in conspiracy theories?

As one of those Americans, I'm offended as hell by your asshole assessment of how much our opinions matter. I have talent. I am a happy, social healthy person. I wouldn't be where I am today if I hadn't been helped by someone close to me. You are only making things worse.

Off-base, misinformed comments like yours just make the paranoid and insane more despondent, and by extension, more paranoid and insane. It's almost certain that the person hearing voices 24/7 was driven into conspiracism by the paranoia that is already a part of him. But pidgeonholing him like you do is not fair.

Extreme cases of paranoia, in which someone is told to kill themselves, hurt others etc. are not the rule (but not the exception either). Many of those people just know from experience that the effects of antipsychotics are worse than the alternative.

I used to read this blog all the time because I thought you were a real voice of reason. I eventually realized that you believe in some pretty despicable shit. Then it became once a week, then once a month. I think this is my last visit. Your blog is stale, 911 Truth is dead, just fucking give it up already.

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:30, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The fruitcake fu fulminates, "...Say slipshod and crashes, would 'God' (Who doesn't exist, just like Allah and YHWH) also include in that little narrative the fact that Ali Mohamed, Al Qaeda's tactical trainer, worked for the FBI, the CIA and Special Forces?"

There you go again, giving your lies advanced billing as "fact".

All this proves--you coolie coddling cornholer--is that you'll believe anything as long as it conforms to your head-up-your-ass opinion.

 
At 30 July, 2010 12:40, Blogger Triterope said...

I'm offended as hell by your asshole assessment of how much our opinions matter.

Huh? I don't think that's what Pat's saying at all.

 
At 30 July, 2010 13:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I used to read this blog all the time because I thought you were a real voice of reason. I eventually realized that you believe in some pretty despicable shit. Then it became once a week, then once a month. I think this is my last visit. Your blog is stale, 911 Truth is dead, just fucking give it up already.

Your mentally ill fans (probably numbering in the thousands) believe 9/11 truth is dead, Pat. Therefore, it is alive. </end of "debunker" logic>

Simple, isn't it, the world of the debunker cult.

 
At 30 July, 2010 13:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Say GB, you vile puke, you teetering, see sawing, toad licking catamite. What's on the menu for today? I can't wait to see more of your dodgy, clownesque denialist antics. Serve us up some more of that blundering bovine blubber you try to pass off as "science". Tell us again about SEM equipment and oxygen detection. That was real schoolboy howler right there, pig snout. Extra extra! GitBile and the traveling circus of bloopering blimps is in town.

 
At 30 July, 2010 14:16, Anonymous Karl said...

"As is pointed out in that post, some famous and talented people in history have had mental problems. But they are the exception, not the rule."

Did I miss something here?

By the way, Anonymous Guy Who Responded After Me, don't twist my words to validate your worthless beliefs.

 
At 30 July, 2010 14:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey loony tune. Listen to Pat. You are not famous, yet still crazy. Thus, you have no contribution to society. Remember, Pat's word is gospel.

Got any statistics on the number of fellow loons that visit this blog? I know the most prominent ones that comment on here play guitar and inspire their nicknames from biblical references. Yet another named himself after an author who wrote about a character fucking his mother after traveling through time-space. Yet another was arrested multiple times (and jailed) for charges ranging from child abuse to racism to stalking. And lived in his mom's basement.

Something is amiss with this blog's "expertise" on "normal" ;-)

 
At 30 July, 2010 14:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excuse me, not the author, the kooky bellicose nutbar named himself after the actual character

 
At 30 July, 2010 16:00, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The degenerate derrière deviate prattles, "...Say GB, you vile puke, you teetering, see sawing, toad licking catamite."

I'm too old to be a "catamite"--you fanny infatuated faux femme illiterate.

"...Serve us up some more of that blundering bovine blubber you try to pass off as 'science'."

I've already done so, and you utterly failed to prove me wrong--you caboose cake boy.

"...Tell us again about SEM equipment and oxygen detection. That was real schoolboy howler right there, pig snout."

Too stupid for words, aren't you, aunt flow? And if you'd ever taken the time to read W. C. McCrone's The Particle Atlas (1973) you'd know why I'm right, and why you're full-of-shit--you three legged camp bitch.

 
At 30 July, 2010 16:18, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know that you toady, two-faced, pathologically lying poop tank. You claimed, however, that Steven Jones et al. couldn't measure oxygen in their samples. Your verbatim lying words:

"Steven Jones employed EDX to determine the composition of the "dust samples". It is well known that oxygen doesn't show up in EDX because oxygen emits very low energy X-rays--that is, ~0.4 keV or less.

The bottom line: oxygen is not reliably measured by EDX, which explains why none of the "dust samples" show oxygen peaks (but that doesn't mean that oxygen isn't abundant in the sample)."


As seen above, you claimed oxygen "doesn't show up" in XEDS or can't be "reliably measured".

You were lying. You should have consulted the paper to see what kind of equipment was used, and you should have checked your pathetic lies:

"An FEI XL30-SFEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used (...) The microscope was also equipped with an EDAX X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry (XEDS) system."

Source: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

"This instrument includes an EDAX Phoenix EDS system and a TexSEM Laboratories EBSD system. The EDS (energy dispersive xray spectroscopy) system can be used for elemental analyses and is capable of detecting carbon, nitrogen and oxygen."

Source:
FEI XL30-SFEG Scanning Electron Microscope

Let's have a look at your "psychopath checklist" again, shall we?

Aggressive narcissism

[1] Glibness/superficial charm

Check.

[2] Grandiose sense of self-worth

Check.

[3] Pathological lying

Check.

[4] Cunning/manipulative

Check.

[5] Lack of remorse or guilt

Double check.

[6] Emotionally shallow

Check.

[7] Callous/lack of empathy

Check.

[8] Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Quadruple check.

Now fuck off.

 
At 30 July, 2010 16:18, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know that you toady, two-faced, pathologically lying poop tank. You claimed, however, that Steven Jones et al. couldn't measure oxygen in their samples. Your verbatim lying words:

"Steven Jones employed EDX to determine the composition of the "dust samples". It is well known that oxygen doesn't show up in EDX because oxygen emits very low energy X-rays--that is, ~0.4 keV or less.

The bottom line: oxygen is not reliably measured by EDX, which explains why none of the "dust samples" show oxygen peaks (but that doesn't mean that oxygen isn't abundant in the sample)."


As seen above, you claimed oxygen "doesn't show up" in XEDS or can't be "reliably measured".

You were lying. You should have consulted the paper to see what kind of equipment was used, and you should have checked your pathetic lies:

"An FEI XL30-SFEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used (...) The microscope was also equipped with an EDAX X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry (XEDS) system."

Source: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

"This instrument includes an EDAX Phoenix EDS system and a TexSEM Laboratories EBSD system. The EDS (energy dispersive xray spectroscopy) system can be used for elemental analyses and is capable of detecting carbon, nitrogen and oxygen."

Source:
FEI XL30-SFEG Scanning Electron Microscope

Let's have a look at your "psychopath checklist" again, shall we?

Aggressive narcissism

[1] Glibness/superficial charm

Check.

[2] Grandiose sense of self-worth

Check.

[3] Pathological lying

Check.

[4] Cunning/manipulative

Check.

[5] Lack of remorse or guilt

Double check.

[6] Emotionally shallow

Check.

[7] Callous/lack of empathy

Check.

[8] Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Quadruple check.

Now fuck off.

 
At 30 July, 2010 16:22, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know that you toady, two-faced, pathologically lying poop tank. You claimed, however, that Steven Jones et al. couldn't measure oxygen in their samples. Your verbatim lying words:

"Steven Jones employed EDX to determine the composition of the "dust samples". It is well known that oxygen doesn't show up in EDX because oxygen emits very low energy X-rays--that is, ~0.4 keV or less.

The bottom line: oxygen is not reliably measured by EDX, which explains why none of the "dust samples" show oxygen peaks (but that doesn't mean that oxygen isn't abundant in the sample)."


Source: GuitarBill

As seen above, you claimed oxygen "doesn't show up" in XEDS or can't be "reliably measured".

You were lying. You should have consulted the paper to see what kind of equipment was used, and you should have checked your pathetic lies:

"An FEI XL30-SFEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used (...) The microscope was also equipped with an EDAX X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry (XEDS) system."

Source: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

"This instrument includes an EDAX Phoenix EDS system and a TexSEM Laboratories EBSD system. The EDS (energy dispersive xray spectroscopy) system can be used for elemental analyses and is capable of detecting carbon, nitrogen and oxygen."

Source:
FEI XL30-SFEG Scanning Electron Microscope

No need to address the other lies, the people reading this know they just have to read the damn paper.

Now, let's have a look at your "psychopath checklist" again, shall we?

Aggressive narcissism

[1] Glibness/superficial charm

Check.

[2] Grandiose sense of self-worth

Check.

[3] Pathological lying

Check.

[4] Cunning/manipulative

Check.

[5] Lack of remorse or guilt

Double check.

[6] Emotionally shallow

Check.

[7] Callous/lack of empathy

Check.

[8] Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Quadruple check.

Now fuck off.

 
At 30 July, 2010 16:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There. Posted it three times. By accident, but perhaps three times is what it takes to get it through your thick head.

 
At 30 July, 2010 18:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

The rectum robber prevaricates, "This instrument includes an EDAX Phoenix EDS system and a TexSEM Laboratories EBSD system. The EDS (energy dispersive xray spectroscopy) system can be used for elemental analyses and is capable of detecting carbon, nitrogen and oxygen."

I don't give a damn how many times you post drivel; you're still wrong.

Only one problem, detecting oxygen and nitrogen is not the same as accurately detecting oxygen and nitrogen.

And you still can't read, Brian.

Here's what I wrote,

"...Steven Jones employed EDX to determine the composition of the "dust samples". It is well known that oxygen doesn't show up in EDX because oxygen emits very low energy X-rays--that is, ~0.4 keV or less."

Keep reading it, queer bait, until you get it through your thick skull.

Now, read MrCrone's book, The Particle Atlas (first edition 1973, and it's updated periodically), and notice that the lightest element reported in any sample listed (using EDX, by the way) is Na with a low energy X-ray at 1.04 keV.

Now, how did Jones accurately measure oxygen with its characteristic low energy X-rays of ~0.4 keV or less?

Answer: He didn't--period.

Check and mate

Thus, you lose again--you science illiterate, retard.

 
At 30 July, 2010 18:19, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Come on, Brian, cough up another spitball of lies--you low-life, science illiterate psychopath.

 
At 30 July, 2010 19:01, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Let the record show that from this day forward, Brian Good, will be known by the odious "title" Rectum Robber the Reprehensible.

"...Make it so, number one."

 
At 30 July, 2010 19:01, Anonymous Arhoolie Vanunu said...

It's apparent that Cracked Pot and Crashes believes that government reports are holy.Hey Dogboy,if nothing is better than God and apple pie is better than nothing,is noting better than God?

 
At 30 July, 2010 19:52, Blogger GuitarBill said...

And what's that I hear emanating from the troofer camp?

You guessed it...

*crickets*

*crickets*

*crickets*

Got to go, it's Friday, so I'm off to my regular Friday night gig. I will return later this evening.

%^)

Until then, enjoy your plate of crow, Brian Good (aka, Rectum Robber the Reprehensible).

 
At 31 July, 2010 05:02, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

Some truthers just don't understand jokes, even though their movement is full of them.

'the fact that Ali Mohamed, Al Qaeda's tactical trainer, worked for the FBI, the CIA and Special Forces?'

Oh right. So one man trained all of AQ. Pull the other one.

How would "God" justify torturing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to extract a "confession"?

Never mind the fact that he admitted responsibility in an interview with an al-Jazeera journalist, months before his arrest:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/mar/04/alqaida.terrorism

Try harder next time, fucknuts.

'It's apparent that Cracked Pot and Crashes believes that government reports are holy.'

Says the only moron on this planet who actually believed the Iranians when they called Rigi a CIA agent.

 
At 31 July, 2010 14:16, Anonymous Anonymous said...

He admitted it if the journalist, an admitted liar, can be believed.

 
At 31 July, 2010 17:33, Blogger Triterope said...

I know the most prominent ones that comment on here play guitar and inspire their nicknames from biblical references. Yet another named himself after an author who wrote about a character fucking his mother after traveling through time-space. Yet another was arrested multiple times (and jailed) for charges ranging from child abuse to racism to stalking. And lived in his mom's basement.

What am I, chopped liver?

 
At 31 July, 2010 18:52, Anonymous Marc said...

How about the Climate Change conspiracy theory? The Iranian nuke conspiracy theory? Any takers? These are some examples of conspiracy theories which are "allowed" by you extremist fruit loops aren't they. Can you say "double standard"?

...

Climate Change conspiracy theory? There is a debate about the causes of climate change, and a seperate debate about the possible effects of that change, but there is no large conspiracy.

The Iranian Nuke Conspiracy was started and maintained by...the Iranians. It is similar to the Iraqi WMD conspiracy that was started and pertetuated by Saddam Huessein. He's the one who said that he had them, and the Iraqi Army even bought new Chinese chemical warfare suits and masks in advance of the invasion to protect themselves when the American forces were gassed.


Neither conspiracy was hatched by some cyber-stalking loon who lives in his mommy's basement in Palo Alto.

 
At 02 August, 2010 03:57, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'He admitted it if the journalist, an admitted liar, can be believed.'

He's not an admitted liar, Brian, that's a figment of your imagination. And I can't help noticing that no AQ spokesman has denounced this supposed fabrication.

 
At 03 August, 2010 10:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

He's an admitted liar. He lied about the date that the interview took place--sackcloth has admitted this and justified it. You clowns let each other lie for each other.

 
At 04 August, 2010 10:06, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Another 100% fact-free non-response, Brian?

Pathetic.

Go honk a cock--you neon-carrying nellie.

 
At 04 August, 2010 23:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yosri Foudra lied about the date he did the interview.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=150885&mesg_id=150885

 
At 06 August, 2010 08:44, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Yosri Foudra lied about the date he did the interview."

Democratic Underground is not a reliable source of information--unless, of course, you define reliable information as misinformation.

Furthermore, the OP substantiated his allegations with information provided by conspiracy websites.

And we all know that citing conspiracy websites is not evidence--it's a circle jerk.

Conclusion: Another epic failure for the idiotic 9/11 troofers.

 
At 07 September, 2010 23:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

The source isn't democraticunderground. The source is globalresearch.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=KUP20070315&articleId=5087

FT wrote: Financial Times states: “Analysts cited the crude editing of [Fouda’s interview] tapes and the timing of the broadcasts as reasons to be suspicious about their authenticity. Dia Rashwan, an expert on Islamist movements at the Al-Ahram Centre for Strategic Studies in Cairo, said: ‘I have very serious doubts [about the authenticity of this tape]. It could have been a script written by the FBI.’”

Drummond, 11 Sept 2002

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home