Alex Jones Loses it on the BBC
For an all Alex Jones nuttiness weekend, Alex is on the BBC with David Aaronovitch, author of Voodoo Histories. For the entertaining part you can just skip to the last couple of minutes.
posted by James B. @ 5:00 PM
95 comments
95 Comments:
I'm generally skeptical that twoofers are mostly in it for the money, I think paranoia and anti-Americanism are for bigger motivators.
However, Jones is certainly one twoofer is making a ton of dough while enjoying the benefits of living in the country he slanders every day.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-10/alex-jones-sells-gold-on-sirius-with-bombing-conspiracies.html
The BBC video is absolutely hilarious. Heck, if I was a conspiratoid, I'd think they paid Jones to make an ass out of himself!
Why pay him when he does it for free?
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, never masturbate while I read SLC's comments section.
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, never masturbate while I read SLC's comments section.
I, horse's ass etrardinare, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, neer masturbate whil I red SLC's coments section.
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Bran "meatball on a fork" God, neve mastubate while I read SLC's comment secion.
I, horse' as extrardinare, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, nevr mastrbte whle I red SLC's cmmnts section.
I, hore's as extrdnair, Brian "matbal on a frk" Goo, neve maturbte we I read SLC's commnts seion.
I, hore's as extire, Bran "metall n a fk" Goo, nvr astrbte wle I red SC's cots sexon.
I'm blind!
Do you have a point?
That you're crazy? Is that ever NOT the point around here?
Petgoat's nonsense shows that I'm crazy? Petgoat's nonsense shows that GutterBall is crazy, obsessed, and not very bright. He keeps tripping himself up by waddling out of character.
That you're crazy? Is that ever NOT the point around here?
Billman, what makes you think I'm crazy?
"Ian, 'meatball on a fork' is so obvious to anyone who understands the 1st law of thermodynamics and Newton's third law that there's no need to publish it anywhere."
"What exactly is idiotic about rake-on-rake and meatball-on-a-fork modelings? Do you perhaps have some cognitive defects in the area of analogies? Don't worry, lots of people with subnormal intelligence do."
"UtterFail, meatball-on-a-fork actually quite aptly addresses the divergent weight-to-resistance ratios between the core and the outer floors. But I can't expect a graphical illiterate like you to understand that."
I see, you don't have evidence that explosives planted inside hollow core columns, that bulged out the column walls to weaken them but did not rupture the walls, would transmit sound to the outside. Thanks for proving that your ridicule of the concept of "silent explosives" is without any factual basis.
I'm not crazy. I'm a scientist, an engineer, a software engineer, a maintenance engineer, a domestic engineer, a physician, a dentist, the principle of Gunn high school, a fire scientist, a metallurgist, a criminologist, a humanist, a communist, a socialist, a capitalist, a pastry chef, a hairdresser, an insurance agent, a goldsmith, a wordsmith, a coprophagiac, meteorologist, a hypnotist, an acupuncturist, a geologist, a mathematician, a philosopher, a philologist, a musician, an artist, a corporate lawyer, a tax lawyer, an accountant, the coroner, the medical examiner, a judicial scholar, an attorney and the mayor of Woodside, CA.
Additionally I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be Petgoat. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not! And, as my avatar indicates, the point is on the top of my bat guano-filled head.
Ian, what makes you think I'm a liar?
Youse gurls lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.
Somebody's got too much time on his hands and a very silly sense of priorities.
Brian, you still haven't told us if you've followed Wesley Willis' advice and cut that hideous homeless mullet of yours.
Laurie Van Auken wants you to cut your mullet, and you won't. Why do you take pleasure in the widows' pain? What's wrong with you?
"It thinks it's funny."
There, you don't even have to respond with your standard humiliated answer. I did it for you.
Remember back in the old days, when you posted as "Brian Good" and I posted as "New Yorker", and you used to babble about smoldering carpets and nomadic fies, and I used to mock you for it, and you'd start squealing?
Yeah, you don't do that much anymore. You barely even babble about invisible widows with "questions" these days.
Sometimes, I think your heart just isn't in 9/11 truth anymore, Brian.
I never babbled about smoldering carpets and nomadic fires, Lyin Ian. You don't know what I do.
This forum isn't worth much anymore. The serious posters left years ago, leaving only small beer like you and GutterBall and MGF.
Remember back in the old days, when you posted as "Brian Good" and I posted as "New Yorker", and you used to babble about smoldering carpets and nomadic fies, and I used to mock you for it, and you'd start squealing?
Ian, I never babbled about smoldering carpets and nomadic fires. You don't know what I do.
Ian, for more about smoldering carpets read the Weidlinger report.
You can read in the Weidlinger Report about the smoldering carpets. They claim that dust knocked down by the impact damped the fires. You don't know the difference between your opinions and facts. If that doesn't cause problems for you in the job world, it's only because you stick to jobs where the difference doesn't matter.
So what makes you think I'm a liar?
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
Youse gurls lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.
Somebody's got too much time on his hands and a very silly sense of priorities.
Brian Good is a fag
I never babbled about smoldering carpets and nomadic fires, Lyin Ian.
False.
This forum isn't worth much anymore. The serious posters left years ago, leaving only small beer like you and GutterBall and MGF.
Well, the truth movement is dead, so why would most people bother with a blog dedicated to 9/11 truth? Pat and James admit to having very little to write about.
You're the only one left who hasn't figured out that 9/11 truth is dead, so I'm here to humiliate you on a daily basis until you do figure it out. Nobody makes you post here.
Somebody's got too much time on his hands and a very silly sense of priorities.
Yes, Brian, you do have too much time on your hands, since you have no job, no friends, no family, no normal hobbies, so of course you do nothing but post spam on this blog.
And your priorities are very silly: posting spam about magic thermite elves for 5-6 people who you don't know and who do nothing but ridicule you mercilessly.
Anyway, Brian, you still haven't told us if you've followed Wesley Willis' advice and cut that hideous homeless mullet of yours.
Laurie Van Auken wants you to cut your mullet, and you won't. Why do you take pleasure in the widows' pain? What's wrong with you?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Somebody's got too much time on his hands and a very silly sense of priorities.
Ian, for more about smoldering carpets read the Weidlinger report.
Man, what a classic thread. Brian babbles insanely about elevator repairmen and spray-on thermite and widows with questions. Back in late 2010 and early 2011, he was still fighting the good fight. Now, he's deflated and can barely muster the will to post even a sentence or two of squealspam.
Somebody's got too much time on his hands and a very silly sense of priorities.
See what I mean?
I understand, Brian. After 4.5 years of constant ridicule and humiliation and with the truth movement dead, you're burnt out. Maybe it's time to check yourself into a psychiatric hospital like I've suggested so many times before?
Maybe it's time to stop thinking your lies have any value at all?
Maybe it's time to stop thinking your lies have any value at all?
Yup, Brian is utterly deflated. I guess even for someone as delusional and stupid as him, 4.5 years of constant humiliation is demoralizing. It's just more evidence that we've defeated him.
C'mon, Brian, if you want to prove to us girls that you're still undefeated, start babbling incoherently about spray-on thermite and widows and pyroclastic flows and invisible silent explosives and the devious elevator repairmen again.
Ian, you don't have the power to humiliate me.
Why would I want to babble incoherently? If you babble incoherently that it would be impossible to plant explosives or incendiaries in the towers unobserved I would tell you quite coherently that it would be easy to plant them in the towers' 15 miles of elevator shafts.
If you babble incoherently that the widows have no questions, I would tell you quite coherently that their 300 questions got only 27 answers.
If you babble incoherently that I am homosexually infatuated with the saggy manboob Willie Rodriguez, I will tell you quite coherently that since I have exposed him as a fraudulent con artist I have little need to talk about him.
If you babble incoherently that all the questions about 9/11 have been answered by the official reports, I will tell you quite coherently about the 115 omissions and distortions in the 9/11 Commission report and the ten essential mysteries left out of the NIST report.
If you babble incoherently that Condi Rice deserves our respect, I will tell you quite coherently that she lied under oath to the faces of the 9/11 widows, and that her buddy Phil Zelikow ran interference for her to protect her in the 9/11 Commission report and was rewarded with a job as special counsel to the Sec'y of State when Condi became Sec'y of State.
But you don't talk about anything of substance. You just babble about haircuts and underwear and magic and elves and San Jose State. You're a waste of time.
C'mon, Brian, if you want to prove to us girls that you're still undefeated, start babbling incoherently about spray-on thermite and widows and pyroclastic flows and invisible silent explosives and the devious elevator repairmen again.
Ian, what makes you think that I babble about spray-on thermite and widows and pyroclastic flows and invisible silent explosives and the devious elevator repairmen?
MR, explosives planted inside the hollow core columns that bulged but did not breach the core columns would have brought little noise to the outside world. Explosions taking place when the collapse was already underway would not have been noticed.
There's nothing wrong with CD charges that don't cut the columns. Bulging them would be sufficient to weaken them.
I didn't say all the floors. I said several floors. Explosives could be planted in the elevator shafts on many floors easily. Hidden inside the hollow core columns it would be difficult to detect.
Hiding explosives inside the hollow box columns is not unfeasible. Most of the box columns were accessible from the elevator shafts.
What makes you think spray-on thermite would be a thin coating? What's to prevent repeated coating? Fireproofing is sprayed on too, you know, inches thick. And incendiaries and/or explosives could be pumped inside hollow core columns through a 3/8" hole in any quantitity desired.
So what makes you think I'm a liar?
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
Youse gurls lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.
Do you have a point?
C'mon, Brian, if you want to prove to us girls that you're still undefeated, start babbling incoherently about spray-on thermite and widows and pyroclastic flows and invisible silent explosives and the devious elevator repairmen again.
Ian, what makes you think that I babble, lie and cite crackpots about pyroclastic flows?
Ian, I have told you many times that a British Professor of Geophysics and the Columbia geologists have used "pyroclastic" to describe the WTC clouds. Actually Gage says "pyroclastic-like" but you're as poorly equipped to handle nuance as you are to handle fact.
DU, Dr. Herbert Huppert, Professor of Theoretical Geophysics and Director of the Institute of Theoretical Geophysics at the University of Cambridge, wrote: "Aside from natural events, a very tragic example of a pyroclastic flow is what happened on the 11th of September, 2001."
So what makes you think I'm a crackpot?
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
Youse gurls lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.
C'mon, Brian, if you want to prove to us girls that you're still undefeated, start babbling incoherently about spray-on thermite and widows and pyroclastic flows and invisible silent explosives and the devious elevator repairmen again.
Ian, what makes you think that I babble about devious invisible elevator repairmen?
I'm not aware of any invisible elevator mechanics. I suppose you think the motorman on the subway is invisible when you can't see him?
Ian, you see the motorman if you're looking for him at the right time and the right place. Same with elevator mechanics. They're not invisible. UtterFail, there's no reason I should waste my time on your 7th grade algebra tests because I can't pass a test in 7th grade algebra.
WAQo, when's the last time you looked in an elevator shaft? How would you expect Security to check 15 miles of elevator shafts in the towers?
I bet you never even looked for explosives in the elevator shaft of the tallest building in Cambria County.
So Ian, what makes you think I"m a liar?
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
Youse gurls lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ian, Jew told me that Jew didn't have a girlfriend, but July to me Julyer!!!!!!!!!!!
Pass the taco, Tito.
Would you mind clarifying your point? You seem to have a lot of resentment against me. Is that because you've humiliated yourself, as so many others humiliate themselves in discussion with me?
C'mon, Brian, if you want to prove to us girls that you're still undefeated, start babbling incoherently about spray-on thermite and widows and pyroclastic flows and invisible silent explosives and the devious elevator repairmen again.
Ian, what makes you think that I babble about devious invisible elevator repairmen?
WAQo, you don't seem to notice that you contradict yourself. You claim that somebody would have noticed the installation of explosives in the 15 miles of WTC elevator shaft, but you ridicule the notion that you should go check elevator shafts in your county for explosives.
So Ian, what makes you think I"m a liar?
I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
Youse gurls lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.
Ian, Jew told me that Jew didn't have a girlfriend, but July to me Julyer!!!!!!!!!!!
Why do idiots like Brian "meatball on a fork" Good make refried beans?
Have you ever heard of an idiot doing something right the first time?
Is your refusal to clarify your point because you have diminished capacity or because you find it rhetorically inconvenient?
A bunch of gay 9/11 truthers are running down a hill, what's going on?
A prison break!
How do you get 500 9/11 truthers into a phone booth?
Throw food stamps in it!
Jew gurls lie and July and July and July and July and July, Julyer!!!!!!
I, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, Jon Gold and Richard Gage all jump off a cliff to see who will hit the ground first. Who wins?
Society.
What do I, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, pick in the off season?
My nose.
Well you should put your snot in a tissue or something instead of posting it online.
Where's Old Jigglecheeks Willie Rodriguez, anyway? He ran away squealing and crying after I showed that his hero story was a lie. He hasn't been back since. I hope Elvis is okay!
If you babble incoherently that it would be impossible to plant explosives or incendiaries in the towers unobserved I would tell you quite coherently that it would be easy to plant them in the towers' 15 miles of elevator shafts.
Sure. The problem is that there is no evidence that anyone planted explosives or incendiaries in the towers. Just because it's possible doesn't mean it happened.
I would tell you quite coherently that their 300 questions got only 27 answers.
And nobody cares.
I am homosexually infatuated with the saggy manboob Willie Rodriguez
You are.
I will tell you quite coherently about the 115 omissions and distortions in the 9/11 Commission report and the ten essential mysteries left out of the NIST report.
And nobody cares.
If you babble incoherently that Condi Rice deserves our respect
Nobody cares about your racist, misogynist hatred of Condoleeza Rice.
But you don't talk about anything of substance.
Why bother? You just repeated the same nonsense you've repeated 1000 times before and that has been debunked 1000 times before. I'd rather mock you about the fact that you're a failed janitor who has no friends, no job, and a hideous haircut.
You're a waste of time.
And yet you've spent 4.5 years responding to me every time I taunt you. Maybe you should stop posting if I'm a waste of time?
Hey Brian, have the widows had their questions answered yet?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!
I had to drop in and share this:
http://deadspin.com/is-pete-carroll-a-9-11-truther-513149713
Very funny stuff in the comments.
Brian likes attacking women. He's a sexist 4 sure.
And you know this how? 'Cause your Rice Krispies whisper secrets to you when you eat supper?
Brian, my Rice Krispies tell me that there are invisible widows with 273 unanswered questions, and that the speed, symmetry, totality of the collapse, pulverized concrete, and molten steel suggest magic spray-on thermite planted by elves was responsible for destroying the WTC towers.
So now I know where you got your information about 9/11.
Also, I most people eat Rice Krispies for breakfast. Your eating them for dinner is more evidence that you're unemployed and, in addition to not being able to afford a normal haircut, you can't afford normal food either.
Your belief that because your Rice Krispies tell you something therefore my Rice Krispies tell me the same thing is irrational.
Your belief that I eat Rice Krispies for dinner is irrational.
Your belief that I can't afford a haircut or food is irrational.
Also, I most people eat Rice Krispies for breakfast. Your eating them for dinner is more evidence that you're unemployed and, in addition to not being able to afford a normal haircut, you can't afford normal food either.
Of course, I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, eat Rice Krispies for dinner, I'm a deviant.
Brian, my Rice Krispies tell me that there are invisible widows with 273 unanswered questions, and that the speed, symmetry, totality of the collapse, pulverized concrete, and molten steel suggest magic spray-on thermite planted by elves was responsible for destroying the WTC towers...So now I know where you got your information about 9/11.
Ian, what makes you think that I babble like a meth-addled Chihuahua about the speed, symmetry, totality of the collapse?
MGF, what exactly makes the widows' 273 questions bullshit, and when did they admit that they were bullshit? You make stuff up...NIST did not answer the big questions at all. They did not address the essential mysteries of the collapses: Speed, symmetry, totality, squibs, arrested rotation, pulverization of concrete, lateral ejection of multi-ton components, the collapse of the robust lower core under nothing but its own weight, and melted steel.
And what makes you think that I babble about molten steel? I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
Dr. Astaneh never said anything contradicting the fact that melted and molten steel was observed at the site. Its presence has not been explained other than by the thermite theory, and its presence represents one of ten essential mysteries that NIST dodged.
So what makes you think that I babble like a meth-addled Chihuahua about pulverized concrete? Remember, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
James, I'd suggest that you send your posts to me for editing before you embarrass yourself by publishing them. Like WAQo/TAW, you seize on a contradiction that is not a contradiction. On the radio, Mr. Gage was talking about explosives. In the recent article, he's talking about nanothermite--an incendiary. I'll suppose that explosives can pulverize concrete without damaging paper. I'll suppose that nanothermite can not. For Mr. Mohr to demand that nanothermite pulverize the concrete is as dishonest as ButtGale's phony questions about Silicon in dust...The explosives/incendiary dichotomy is another phony contradiction, hilarious though the debunkers may find it. In my shower I use soap AND shampoo. I normally use soap on my body and shampoo on my hair--but sometimes I use soap on my hair, and sometimes I use shampoo on my body. You guys demanding that it must be all explosives or all incendiaries is as willfully dumb as saying "But you said you use shampoo! But you said you use soap! Which is it, soap or shampoo? Get your story straight!"
So Ian, what makes you think I"m a liar?
Besides, I, horse's ass extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
So what makes you think I'm a crackpot?
Youse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
Which one of those comments do you think was "babbling", and what about it made you think it was babbling?
Brian likes attacking women. He's a sexist 4 sure.
TAW, I, assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, do not attack women, I prefer to purchase them from the Supermarket -- barbecued.
And where did you get the idea that I'm sexist?
So how many Brian Good's does it take to screw in a light bulb? None, let the bitch cook in the dark.
How do you turn a fox into an elephant? Marry it.
So what's the difference between oral sex and anal sex? Oral sex makes your day. Anal sex makes her hole weak.
So TAW, what makes you think I'm sexist?
I, assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, couldn't possibly be punxsutawneybarney. They lie. I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!
Youse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
Brian has no clue who I am cause he can't fit the puzzle pieces together. Clearly he's too stupid.
Brian helped out on the film "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out":
http://midpen-media-center.blogspot.com/2012/07/mc-volunteer-brian-hand-worked-on.html
I guess he did stick figure animations and other grade school stuff. LOL
Kevin Barrett e-mail address: kbarrett@merr.com
And William Rodriguez's e-mail: Willrod777@gmail.com
Ask them about Brian and how Brian continues to harass and stalk them.
Hey Brian, have the widows had their questions answered yet?
Ian, what makes you think that I, assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, babble like a three-balled Chihuahua about the widows' questions?
The issue, MGF, is that the widows have 300 questions and got only 27 answers.
Ian, the widows have questions. They gave 300 questions to the 9/11 Commission and they only got 27 answers...You are out of touch with reality.
So the widows' 273 unanswered questions and NIST's 10 unanswered mysteries are "derp". Thanks for making yourself clear. And where is your pet hero, Old Jigglecheeks, whose only redeeming factor from your side of the table is that he claims he rejected the truth movement (when it was the truth movement that rejected him). Your tolerance of his blatant con-artistry only shows your dishonesty or gullibility.
You're a liar, Ian...The questions have not been answered. Neither the 273 questions from the widows nor the Ground Zero questions of symmetry, totality, speed, pulverized concrete or molten metal have been answered...It's YOUR squealing that's going to help get the widows' questions answered, Ian. When curious people come to this forum and they see you sneering at the widows, they will be inspired to help them get answers.
Ian, you lie. You know as well as I that I have dozens of times named the widows who still have questions, and that 273 of the widows' 300 questions have not been answered by the 9/11 Commission.
The widows' unanswered questions are evidence that the US government lied about 9/11, not once but repeatedly. My logic is flawless. So what makes you think that I, assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, babble like a meth-addled Chihuahua about the widows' questions?
And Ian, what makes you think I'm a crackpot? Questions are evidence, Ian, and your tolerance of ButtGale's blatant con-artistry only shows your dishonesty and gullibility.
Jouse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
Which one of those comments do you think was "babbling", and what about it made you think it was babbling?
Any reasomable person would see that the one babbling is you.
Some funny shit going on with Brian. Check it out:
http://digitaljournal.com/article/331530#tab=comments&sc=1599316
Brian Good 10 mins ago flagged as abuse - show comment
#1036
*********, you libeled me when you claimed that I harassed/stalked Carol Brouillett.
You libeled me when you claimed I was a pedophile and a sex stalker.
You libeled me when you claimed that I had committed crimes.
You libeled me when you claimed that I am "a sick individual".
You refuse to back up your libelous claims, and refuse to retract them.
Your posts are abusive.
I have never harassed or stalked William Rodriguez or Kevin Barrett. They have lied in claiming that I stalk them. I have attended their public appearances, I have commented on news articles about them. They are both public figures, both having appeared on TV anytime they got a chance. Pointing out their lies and their bigotry is not harassment, nor is it libel, nor is it stalking.
No truther has ever murdered anyone on behalf of the truth movement. You are lying, Wil. The truth movement does not benefit from murder. Dr. Barrett has advocated violence while pretending to be a truth movement leader. It's important for people to understand that.
When I asked you to point to the language in the Code that dealt with my alleged "crimes" you couldn't do it. Your false claims are libelous. Please provide me with the name of your legal counsel.
Brian has no clue who I am cause he can't fit the puzzle pieces together. Clearly he's too stupid.
On the contrary, TAW, I, assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, have solved many puzzles, for children ages 4 to 7, and I didn't need one clue.
Brian helped out on the film "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out":
I, assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, also helped make the 1959 American epic historical drama film, Ben-Hur. It's a fact that I was William Wyler, Charlton Heston, Stephen Boyd, Jack Hawkins, and Hugh Griffith's fluff.
So TAW, what makes you think I'm a liar?
Jouse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
The pathetic thing is that these clowns think they're clever.
The pathetic thing is that these clowns think they're clever.
Brian, you shouldn't say thagt about yourself.
Another pathetic thing is that you think I did.
Getting your ass whooped around every where aren't ya Brian?
You still are a clueless bastard to who I really am.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Making_false_statements
Making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) is the common name for the United States federal crime laid out in Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which generally prohibits making false or fraudulent statements, or concealing information....
You make false statements about people everyday Brian. You are a criminal.
Says the lying liar with his lying lies.
What false statements do you think I make, fool?
You made false statements on here and every where else online. You and you alone made those false statements and you're guilty for doing it.
What's the matter Brian? Can't agree with the laws you disobey?
If Brian cares to press the issue of his false statements about everyone and lying to people then I might have to direct his full attention to this:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
Is Brian willing enough to cross the line as far as the law goes? Will he continue to pursue his false statements in front of a Supreme Court Judge by undermining Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code without evidence to prove his innocence? Will he save himself the trouble of getting a fine and sent to prison for 5 years and drop everything he's currently doing in order not to go to prison?
And Brian thought I was stupid. Tsk Tsk
I see Brian spent another lonely Friday night posting spam about magic thermite elves. Too bad he has no friends, otherwise he could have done something fun on a Friday night.
I see that Lyin Ian sees things that are not there. No surprise.
TAW, I'm glad that the internet has expanded your intellectual horizons. I hope you can ask a nice policeman and find your way to the library, and maybe after a few months there you can find your way to your local junior college in the fall.
I'm hoping that I can convince Kevin, Willie and Carol into suing your ass for false statements, harassment and stalking.
I hope they do so you can spend your time in prison and make you stay off the internet. And if you do go to prison I hope they tell you not to use another computer for the remainder of your life.
Rotsa Ruck, Boxa Rox.
I see Brian doesn't even want to discuss 9/11 anymore. Now, it's nothing but dumbspam directed at people here. Meanwhile, the widows still don't have a single one of their 273 unanswered questions addressed.
Pathetic.
Brian knows he's guilty of breaking Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
He knows that he's giving false statements about people.
He knows that his ass is in the frying pan.
Brian on Amazon? OMG Nooooooooooooooo! LOL!
http://www.amazon.com/review/R2UJB4W20HOBVP
1 of 8 people found this review helpful.
Also, all of 7 people reviewed the book at all.
So Brian is posting dumbspam on Amazon about a book nobody read. And he's getting downdinged for it, because Brian can never post anywhere without pissing everyone off.
Brian, maybe you should try reviewing Justin Bieber albums. Your obnoxiousness might serve a better purpose there.
I remember that email exchange I had with Carol Brouillet. I finally found it again.
Here it is:
Sadly, Brian used to be a friend. I ended the friendship when it was apparent to me that he would have liked to harmed my marriage. We have a difference of worldviews and we disagree on many issues and interpretations of reality. I try to avoid him whenever possible and do not answer his emails. He might not have perceived his actions towards me as "harassment" and he didn't assault me physically, but I didn't want or appreciation his attentions or his attacks on other people in the Truth Movement, or his suggestions/interpretations of my emotions/behavior, etc.
In his defense, I will say that last September 11th (2009), when I organized a rally/march, two booths at the Power to the Peaceful Festival (which drew 70,000 people), and my organization, the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance held two Film Festivals, and I was invited to speak on Satyagraha that evening at the Gandhi Statue (Satyagraha started on 9/11/1906 with Gandhi in South Africa opposed to the racist laws there), I actually phoned Brian the day before to ask for his help in transporting an awning, signs, literature, stuff for our booths to the Festival and back. He kindly pitched in and helped, and did not "harass me" at all.
I do think he tries to be honest, but I'm afraid like the rest of humanity he has his own blind spots and misinterpretations of reality. I do agree with him 100% that the official 9/11 story as sold by Zelikow and the Commission are false and have been used to attack our rights, and launch wars, and construct a global police state. I can't imagine why anyone who looks into the facts would defend the official position. However there is not unanimity amongst the Truth Movement on what really did happen or on all the dozens of facets of 9/11.
But I do hate arguing all the time- so I don't want to debate you or Brian- so please do not use this letter as a weapon against him and indirectly against me- because if you throw parts of it out of context at him, then I will be subject to more "email harassment"- since the guy apparently lives on his computer.
Carol Brouillet
Funny how Brian thinks he didn't harass her nor tried to wreck her marriage. But the evidence shows otherwise.
And if I'm a liar then that makes Carol a liar, right Brian?
Ian, it was important to post reviews of Barrett's books (as little read as they were) because he was passing himself off as a thinker, as a truth movement leader, and as an expert on the "War on Terror" on the basis of being a published author. So it was important for people who might tend to be impressed by the fact that he had written books to know something about the nature of those books.
I'm getting downdinged because few people other than Barrett's fans have ever read his books, and people who have not read his book are unlikely to feel strongly enough about the reviews to rate the reviews.
Wil, the text you cite does not claim that I tried to wreck Carol's marriage.
I never tried to wreck Carol's marriage. I thought her stable marriage was very important to her status as an activist and a candidate.
And as a mother of three.
18 U.S.C. § 1001
Nah, that's only for proceedings under Federal jurisdiction. States have similar laws for state matters. Lying on the Internet is not only legal, it's normal.
Frankly Brian,
I don't think your attacks on me, Kevin Barrett, and William Rodriguez have anything to do with Kevin Barrett or William Rodriguez or anything rational. The attacks have to do with Brian Good and Carol Brouillet and are completely emotional. You have a crush on me and erroneously hold delusions about me. You are being irrationally jealous of Kevin and William. You cannot accept the fact that I am happily married and refuse to allow you to TRY to cause trouble between my husband and I. Because of your delusions, I cannot ever feel "safe" in your presence alone, and would rather not see you again, but you are so desperate for attention that you are doing extremely negative, destructive things- attacking me and respected members of the 9/11 Truth Movement to force me to pay attention to you.
Please stop attacking Kevin, William and I. Do something useful- attack the people who did 9/11, not the people who are putting so much effort into exposing the lies and stopping them. Leave me alone- stop the email attacks on me and others. I think it probably harms your reputation more than mine, although it is horrifically embarrassing to me to think that at one time I thought of you as a friend. Now I only see you as a threat to me, my family, the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance and the 9/11 Truth Movement. I have zero confidence in your judgement and rationality.
Carol Brouillet
Pot calling kettle black Brian.
1 of 8 people found this review helpful.
Yes, I assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, voted for myself because I find my reviews very helpful, as would any dedicated narcissist.
Also, all of 7 people reviewed the book at all.
Ian, I assclown extraordinaire, Brian "meatball on a fork" Good, said "autofellation"! Ron Jeremy eat your heart out! Neeeener, neeeeeener, neeeeener!
So Brian is posting dumbspam on Amazon about a book nobody read. And he's getting downdinged for it, because Brian can never post anywhere without pissing everyone off.
But I was "engaging in symbolic autofellation"!
Brian, maybe you should try reviewing Justin Bieber albums. Your obnoxiousness might serve a better purpose there.
Can I interest Justin " in symbolic autofellation"?
So Ian, what makes you think that I'm a sex predator?
Jouse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
RGT, defamatory lies are libel, and that is a crime.
I am quite safe in calling William Rodriguez a con artist and Kevin Barrett a bigot, because I can prove that those statements are not lies.
There is also the issue that in the USA defamatory remarks about public figures are generally protected. Rodriguez and Barrett are public figures, having sought out TV appearances and radio and on-stage appearances, and put up youtube videos about themselves on the internet.
I have never sought to be a public figure.
I'm getting in touch with Willie so he can sue Brian for false statements, harassment and stalking.
Nah, that's only for proceedings under Federal jurisdiction. States have similar laws for state matters. Lying on the Internet is not only legal, it's normal.
RGT, I have never sought to be a public figure...except when I'm stalking and flashing little old ladies in Golden Gate Park.
So what makes you think that I'm a sex predator? Symbolic autofellation, anyone?
Jouse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
TAW, if Willie could sue me he would have done so a long time ago. I didn't make any false statements, I didn't harass anyone, and I didn't stalk anyone.
I'm getting in touch with Willie so he can sue Brian for false statements, harassment and stalking.
TAW, if Willie could sue me he would have learned symbolic autofellation a long time ago. I didn't make any false statements, I symbolically autofellate. I didn't harass anyone, I symbolically autofellate. And I didn't stalk anyone, I symbolically autofellate.
Symbolic autofellation, anyone?
So what makes you think that I'm a sex predator?
Jouse gurls ly and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, and July and July and July and July and July and July and July, JULYERS!!!!!!!!!!
I'm not the one who published myself on a book cover holding a giant microphone in front of my face.
Brian, what would you do if I looked up your criminal record and displayed it out on SLC for the world to see?
Would you deny everything on your criminal record or would you claim that the State Police and Government officials of Palo Alto, CA falsified your records?
Brian claims that bandsaws where secretly placed inside all 3 WTC's.
That's the most idiotic and thoughtless theory I've ever heard in my life.
Read this hilarious shit that came from Brian, it's a riot:
Brian Good Dec 8, 2012 flagged as abuse - show comment
#633
What exactly is far-fetched about the hypothesis? Which of its elements do you dispute?
1. Incendiaries can heat steel
2. heated steel is weaker than cool steel
3. explosives can be planted and detonated inside hollow box columns
4. a mere 9 pounds of RDX is sufficient to cut the columns, according to NIST
5. a much smaller charge would be sufficient to bulge heat-weakened column walls out
6. the sound of explosives detonated inside hollow box columns which bend the box column walls but do not break the walls will be largely contained inside the hollow box columns
9 lbs of explosives? Now that's some funny shit. Brian thinks 9 lbs can damage a HOLLOW column made of 2" steel.
TAW, you're only showing your ignorance. Where do you get your information that column 79 was made of 2" steel?
NIST said 9 pounds of RDX could take out xcolumn 79.
Oh, so which of the six propositions do you dispute and why?
NIST said 9 pounds of RDX could take out xcolumn 79.
Show me the source from NIST themselves saying such a thing and not a Twoofer website.
I Challenge you to provide the info from NIST.
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/upload/WTC7RevisedTechnicalBriefing_111908.pdf
Other Possible Hypotheses: Role of Blast Events
Scenarios of a hypothetical blast event that could have occurred in WTC 7 on September 11, 2001, were assessed, including blast location, size, and timing.
Phase I: Identify hypothetical blast scenarios to initiate structural collapse.
A scenario with the minimum amount of required explosive (9 pounds of linear shape charge of RDX) was identified, which was appropriate for the columns on the east side of the building.
The recommended column preparation for use of this shape charge required at least 30 minutes (cutting and placing).
Additional preparation time was required to clear the column for cutting, such as removing walls or other coverings that might have restricted access to bare steel at a column section.
A scenario/hypotheses is not evidence of any type of explosives used inside WTC7.
You lost Captain Oblivious.
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/upload/WTC7RevisedTechnicalBriefing_111908.pdf
Role of Hypothetical Blast Events (3)
Hypothetical blast events did not cause the collapse of WTC 7. NIST concluded that blast events did not occur and found no evidence of any blast events.
The minimum explosive charge (lower bound) required to fail a critical column (i.e., Column 79) would have:
produced a pressure wave that would have broken windows on the north and east faces of the building near Column 79.
resulted in a sound level of 130 to 140 decibels (a sound level consistent with a gunshot blast, standing next to a jet plane engine, and more than 10 times louder than being in front of speakers at a rock concert), at least half a mile away.
generated a sound that would be reflected and channeled with minimum attenuation down urban streets with hard building exteriors.
Although such a blast could be heard a mile away, there were no witness reports of such a loud noise, nor was such a noise heard on audio tracks of video tapes that recorded the WTC 7.
Butt hurt yet Captain Oblivious?
Role of Hypothetical Blast Events (4)
Prior to preparing a column for intentional demolition, walls and/or column enclosures and SFRM would have to be removed and replaced without being detected.
Preparing the column includes steps such as cutting sections with torches (which produces noxious and odorous fumes), and careful placement of charges and an initiation device.
A much larger charge would be required to fail the column without prior preparation, including cutting; the resulting sound level and extent of window breakage would be much greater.
Intentional demolition usually prepares most, if not all, interior columns in a building with explosive charges, not just one column.
It is unlikely that explosive charges would have been applied to just one column (that being the critical column) or that such activity could have taken place without being detected.
Observations for WTC 7 do not match the typical sequence of events for a controlled demolition.
Video evidence clearly supports a sequence of failures (initiation, vertical progression, horizontal progression, and global collapse) based on a single point of initiation.
The observed collapse sequence is inconsistent with a typical controlled demolition where charges are placed in multiple locations across the building and detonated in rapid succession.
Another factiod rubbed in your ugly face Captain Oblivious.
Post a Comment
<< Home